Process Capability

Analysis for Variability

Reduction of Kecap Ikan
Kecap
Cap
Cap “CipCup” Filling
CipCup
Process
 Project Management Infographics

Analysis Data Experimental design Result

The product’s net weight Identify the potential Evaluation of the filling
specification established causes of the excess process was carried out
is 199 ± 1ml. filling. Once these through comparison
comprehends the causes are identified, an result between before
weights of the bottle experimental design and after experiment
has to be carried out
 1. Analysis Data

A. Checksheet B. Normality C. Capability Analysis D. Control Chart

Collect data in Analysis as Normality Process Capability Control Chart

checksheet Test. Analysis Analysis
 A. Checksheet
CHECKSHEET FILLING KECAP IKAN CAP "CIPCUP"
tanggal Filling (ml) tanggal Filling (ml) tanggal Filling (ml) tanggal Filling (ml)
jam jam jam jam
produksi 198-200 produksi 198-200 produksi 198-200 produksi 198-200
03:29 201,57 03:29 200,08 03:29 200,08 03:29 199,01
201,63 199,16 200,12 200,04
04:33 201,39 04:33 201,27 04:33 200,21 04:33 199,85
201,00 200,33 200,63 200,34
05:27 200,62 05:27 199,96 05:27 199,18 05:27 200,19
201,64 200,80 199,90 200,15
06:38 199,81 06:38 199,81 06:38 200,21 06:38 200,75
200,04 200,25 200,34 198,82
07:27 200,33 07:27 200,92 07:27 200,49 07:27 201,38
201,49 200,42 200,03 200,20
08:33 200,74 08:33 200,87 08:33 200,32 08:33 200,15
200,35 200,54 198,69 200,17
09:30 198,86 09:30 200,35 09:30 199,96 09:30 200,20

Checksheet 10:33
200,16
201,30 10:33
199,30
200,77 10:33
200,11
200,08 10:33
199,49
199,75
199,52 199,67 200,02 199,78
25-Mar-22 26-Mar-22 27-Mar-22 28-Mar-22
12:36 199,90 12:36 199,85 12:36 198,98 12:36 200,05
Daily sample was 13:27
200,17
13:27
199,40
13:27
199,03
13:27
200,30
199,85 199,90 199,64 200,11
gathered every hour 199,55 199,87 200,53 200,13

and the result of 14:34 199,91

200,44
14:34 200,80
199,59
14:34 200,24
199,77
14:34 199,81
200,58
weighing was 15:35 199,53 15:35 200,80 15:35 199,66 15:35 199,82
200,89 200,44 199,87 200,45
registered in a 16:30 200,00 16:30 199,96 16:30 199,81 16:30 199,76

checksheet. 18:37
200,55
200,34 18:37
199,76
200,65 18:37
199,63
199,66 18:37
200,77
199,68
200,13 200,77 199,33 199,65
19:28 200,02 19:28 199,69 19:28 199,29 19:28 199,51
199,67 200,97 199,44 199,94
20:30 200,76 20:30 198,86 20:30 199,32 20:30 200,88
200,38 200,70 199,78 200,20
 B. Normality

Normality
Normality test was
used to determine if
filling process data
set is well-modeled
by a normal
distribution.

Since the data fitted to the red line that

represents the normal distribution.
 C. Capability Analysis

Capability Analysis

Process capability
analysis is defined as
the engineering study
to estimate the
process capability.
 C. Capability Analysis

Conclusion from CP result

According to the potential process capability index value observed in this

result (Cp =0.62), the process is not suitable for the task. Therefore it is
imperative to make serious modifications in order to reach a satisfactory
quality. On the other hand, since this value is greater than the one obtained
Capability Analysis for the real process capability index (Cpk = -0.07), it could be recognized
that the process is not centered, which means that the filling process mean
Process capability is found far away from the center of the specifications, and there exist a
analysis is defined as strong possibility to produce units greater to the volume that goes over the
the engineering study upper specification limits.
to estimate the
process capability.
 D. Control Chart

Control Chart
Control charts
focuses the attention
towards the special
causes of variation
when they appear
and reflect the
variation magnitude
due to common
causes.
 D. Control Chart

Conclusion from control chart result

Picture shows the control chart for March 2022, where the filling process
Control Chart mean was above 200,12 ml. In this picture observed that 9 points in a row
on same side of center line, reason why it is assumed that the process is
Control charts
not under statistical control.
focuses the attention
towards the special
causes of variation
when they appear
and reflect the
variation magnitude
due to common
causes.
 2. Experimental Design

A. Fishbone B. Make a design

Experimental design
has to be carried out
A fishbone diagram is
to adequate the
a visual way to look
process to the
at cause and effect.
company filling
specifications.
 A. Fishbone

Measurement Mercury Material Personnel

Calibration, RM Quality, Operators,

Scales Bottle size Training

Kecap Ikan
Fishbone Net Weight

A fishbone diagram is Air

a visualization tool Nozzles,
Temperature, Weighing
Filling speed
for categorizing the Humidity
potential causes of a
problem. Environment Saturn Method Machines
 A. Fishbone

Conclusion from fishbone

The potential causes that can have an effect on the net weight of
kecap are identified in picture. These potential factors
were generated by brainstorming and then they were organized in a
Fishbone cause-and-effect diagram.
From the figure above and taking into account the prior knowledge of the
A fishbone diagram is filling process, the problems identified during process capability
a visualization tool analysis are attributed to three factors:
for categorizing the X1: Bottle Size (Sizes 1, 2 and 3)
potential causes of a X2: Filling velocity (5 bpm 10 bpm to 15 bpm)
problem. X3: Process Temperature (75°C, 82.5°C and 90°C)
 B. Make a Design

Experimental Design

Three levels were selected to each cause identified to test which of

these are vital. The methodology that is used to identify the factors that
have an effect on response variable is known as design of experiments.

Make a design Experiment Bottle Size Filling Velocity Process Temp

Filling (ml)
Filling 1 Filling 2 Filling 3
1 1 5 75 199,16 199,38 198,90
2 2 10 82,5 199,98 200,21 200,11
3 3 15 90 202,71 202,22 202,44
4 1 5 82,5 199,05 198,67 199,37
5 2 10 90 200,92 201,00 201,06
6 3 15 75 200,25 200,07 200,27
7 1 5 90 199,76 199,96 199,84
8 2 10 75 199,69 199,56 199,96
9 3 15 82,5 200,68 200,95 201,02

*Result of experiment
 B. Make a Design

Result of Experiment

Make a design

An analysis of variance was carried out to determine the effect

that each factor has on the response variable. The results demonstrated
that bottle size and process temperature are the
most important variation causes in the kecap filling process.
Therefore, these factors were used to optimize the process.
 B. Make a Design

Result of Experiment
The results show that the largest effects coincide precisely with the
significant factors distinguished. Both significant factors have a positive
effect on the dependent variable. The size of bottle have a effect to filling
process due to weight range of size 1 until 3 high enough. Therefore, it is
recomended to use size 1 which size 1 have the smallest weight. Also, it
was observed that the higher the process temperature, the higher process
Make a design variability. Therefore, it is recommended to work at a process temperature
of 75°C. This temperature is essential for tight packaging and it removes the
Oxygen (O2) present in the bottle.

Size Velocity Temperature

1 5 75

*New design specification

 3. Result

Checksheet

Normal Process is not

Distribution under control
The process
meets the
specifications
Cp > 1,33
 3. Result

Before After

CP= 0,62 CP = 1,71

RESULT
Comparison
before and after
experiment
 THANKS

Yefta Kristiyan
CREDITS: This presentation template was created by Slidesgo, including
icons by Flaticon, infographics & images by Freepik