You are on page 1of 77

Bioburden estimation of reusable

and single use medical devices –


methodology and evaluation

Egil Lingaas
Department of Infection Prevention
Rikshospitalet
Oslo
Norway

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Sterilization is a special process
The effectiveness of the process
can not be fully verified by
subsequent inspection and testing
of the product

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Bioburden
Population of viable microorganisms
on or in product and/or a package

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Origins of bioburden

● raw materials
● manufacturing of components
● assembly process
● manufacturing environment
● assembly/manufacturing aids
● cleaning process
● packaging of finished products

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Use of bioburden determination
● Validation and revalidation of sterilization
processes
● Routine monitoring of:
● raw materials
● components
● packaging
● manufacturing processes
● Assessment of the efficiency of cleaning
processes
● Environmental monitoring

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Sterilization in industry

Bioburden determination common


as part of sterile production

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Sterilization in hospitals
Bioburden determination not common
➨ In validation of sterile production
➨ For routine monitoring

Medical devices
– Multiple use
– Single use

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Microorganisms on surgical instruments
Proportion of instruments (%)

120

100

80
Bef ore w ashing
60 Af ter w ashing I

40 Af ter w ashing II

20

0
< 10 > 10 > 100 > 1000
CFU per instrum ent

Modified from Nyström B. J Hosp Infect 1981;2:363


Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Bioburden on surgical instruments
before sterilzation
Proportion of insttruments (%)

80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0-10 11-100 > 100
Microorganisms per instruments (CFU)

Modified from Rutala WA, et al. AJIC 1998;26:143


Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Bioburden on surgical instruments
after use and after washing
Number of instruments 35
30
After use
25
After washing
20
15
10
5
0
< 10 10-100 100-1000 1000-10000
CFU

Modified from Chu NS, et al. AJIC 1999;27:315


Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Change of bioburden on surgical
instruments during washing
16
Number of instruments

14
12
10 Decrease: 32% Increase: 45%
8
6
4
2
0
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3

Log10 change

Modified from Chu NS, et al. AJIC 1999;27:315


Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Bioburden determination and
sterilization in hospitals

Non-medical devices
– Multiple use
– Single use

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
ISO 11737
Sterilization of health care products
- Microbiological methods
Part 1: Determination of a population of
microorganisms on product

Part 2: Tests of sterility performed in the


validation of a sterilization process

Part 3: Guidance on evaluation and the


determination of bioburden data

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Selection of product

● Representative of the batch


● Whole product, if feasible
● If not: As large a portion as
possible

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Selection of an appropriate method

● Removal of microorganisms
● Culturing
● Enumeration
● Characterization

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
TECHNIQUES FOR REMOVAL
OF MICROORGANISMS
FROM PRODUCT

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Adhesion of microorganisms
to surfaces

● Surface characteristics
● Microorganisms involved
● Origin of contamination
● Presence of other substances

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Removal techniques
● Stomaching
● Ultrasonication
● Shaking (mechanical or manual)
● Vortex mixing
● Flushing
● Blending (disintegration)
● Swabbing

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Stomacher

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Removal techniques
● Stomaching
● Ultrasonication
● Shaking (mechanical or manual)
● Vortex mixing

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Removal techniques
● Stomaching
● Ultrasonication
● Shaking (mechanical or manual)
● Vortex mixing
● Flushing
● Blending (disintegration)
● Swabbing

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Eluents
Diluents
Transport media

No proliferation or inactivation
of microorganisms

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Eluents and diluents

● Sodium chloride 0.25 – 0.9 %


● Ringer
● Buffered peptone water
● Phosphate buffered saline
● Thiosulphate Ringer
● ---------------
● ---------------

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Additives to eluents and diluents

● Surfactant
●Polysorbate (Tween) 80
● Neutralizers for microbicidal and
microbistatic substances

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Release of substances from product

Substances released into suspending fluid


should neither promote nor inhibit
the growth of microorganisms
 bacteriostasis test

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Methods where removal of
microorganisms is not employed

● Contact plating
● Agar overlaying

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Contact plate

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Contact plate

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
-- after incubation

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Medical device ?

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
TRANSFER TO CULTURE
MEDIUM

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Membrane filtration

● Filtration of an eluent
followed by incubation of the filter
on appropriate growth medium
● Plates are incubated

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Membrane filter

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Growth of moulds on filter

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Growth of bacteria on filter

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Membrane filtration

Particularly useful for:


➨ Suspensions with low concentrations
of microorganisms

➨ Suspensions with microbicidal or


microbistatic substances

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Pour plating

● Defined aliquots of suspension mixed


with molten agar medium at 45 oC

● Agar allowed to solidify in the plate

● Plates are incubated

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Spread plating

● An aliquot of defined volume is spread


on the surface of a nutritient medium

● Plates are incubated

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Spiral plating

● A defined volume spread in a spiral track


on a rotating agar plate

● Plates are incubated

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Media and incubation conditions

Several combinations of media and


incubation conditions are usually required
Bacteria
Yeasts and moulds
Anaerobic bacteria

30 - 35 oC
20 - 25 oC
Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
ENUMERATION

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Enumeration procedures

● Detecting small colonies


● Counting and reporting unusual colonies
e.g. spreaders
● Enumerating and reporting crowded plates
● Reporting counts from multiple dilutions

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
CHARACTERIZATION

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Characterization

● staining properties
● cell morphology
● colony morphology
● use of selective culturing
● biochemical or other means of identification
● genetic analysis

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Spore forming bacteria

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Validation of method for
removing microorganisms

● Repetitive recovery

● Inoculating a known number


of microorganisms onto product

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Repetitive recovery

Treatment no. Colonies


1 86
2 6
3 1
4 1
Total 94
Removal by first treatment 80,8%
Correction factor 1,24

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Routine monitoring of bioburden

● Sample size
● Sampling frequency
● Acceptable limits and actions taken
if a limit is exceeded
● Trend analysis

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Bioburden in air/water channel of flexible
endoscopes after disinfection
700

600
Bioburden (CFU)

500

400
Mean:
Median:
300 39 CFU
0 CFU
200
100
0
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27
Endoscope no

Ashurst L, Kjos B, Lingaas E. 2004


Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Evaluation and corrective action

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Does bioburden determination
tell the truth ??
Sampling deficiency?
Adhesion
Biofilm
Incomplete dispersion

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Does bioburden determination
tell the truth ??
Lack of growth ?
Germination of spores
”Dormant” bacteria
Small colony variants
------
Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Raw materials
Cleaning/lubrication/manufacturing liquid
Transport/holding containers
Work surfaces
Personell attire/hygiene practices
Handling/assembly
Packaging materials and procedures
Storage conditions
Characterization of organisms recovered
Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
But what is the relevance?

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Can the problem be solved
simply by adding
another minute
to the sterilization cycle?

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Bioburden, inactivation factor
and sterility assurance level (SAL)
1.000.000

Inactivation required:
Number of organisms

10.000
: 1012 : 10 9 : 106
100

0.01

0.0001

0.000001
SAL 10 -6
Exposure to inactivation process
Sykehushygiene 03/2002
Universitetsklinikk

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
Dead microorganisms can
also create problems
Endotoxin
Proteins
Teichoic acid
---

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas
What is the maximum
allowable number of dead bacteria
on a sterile device?

?
● 0
● 10
● 100
● 1000
● 10000
● 10.0000
● 1.000.000
● 10.000.000
● 100.000.000

Sykehushygiene 05/2004
Universitetsklinikk Egil Lingaas

You might also like