Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ideas and situations. All our internal processes—including our thoughts, words, sights, and
sounds—are reactions to the environment around us. The context in which those stimuli are
presented to us significantly shapes our evaluation of them. Context has the power to change our
views of a particular event. To determine a context, we ask ourselves four questions. The first
question we ask is with whom we are conversing. Second, when does the conversation occur? It
refers to the timing of the conversation. Third, where is the conversation occurring? It refers to
the location of the event. Fourth, what is the subject of our discussion? These four elements
establish the context for action. Context can be divided into three categories: situational context,
A situational context is the physical surroundings that individuals see. The image provided
depicts a fair exam. By looking at the physical environment of the picture, we can see an
examiner instructing all of the animals shown in the image to climb a tree. The animals shown in
the image include an elephant, crow, goldfish, monkey, seal, and penguin. Moreover, all of this
occurs in a forest. So, what do all these elements of the physical environment represent? To
discover, let's apply our background knowledge. Background knowledge is of two types. The
cultural context is one of these. We live in a society and each of us has a unique lifestyle. Culture
relates to our way of life, whereas cultural background knowledge is what we acquire from our
culture. The other type of knowledge is interpersonal. This refers to exchanging information
while having a conversation. With this in mind, we can infer that the scenario depicts a setting
similar to a test. Moving on to the co-textual context refers to the linguistic surroundings. With
the help of all three types of context, I can conclude that the picture refers to our educational
system. To clarify, we can find “ Fair exam” and “same exam " from the co-textual context.” All
people are endowed with certain skills of their own. But our educational system trains us to be
evaluated on a narrow set of criteria. Let's pretend that one student is very skillful in drawing and
math but his other academic subjects skill is not that strong. On the other hand, another student is
very skillful in all academic subjects but can not draw. In this case, the student who is really
skillful in the drawing will be overlooked due to his low performance in his academic subjects.
In comparison, the other student who can not draw but is really good in academic subjects will
be highly praised for his performance. This is one of the remarkable problems of our educational
system. Albert Einstein said, “A fish can not be judged by its ability to climb a tree!” But our
education system continuously judges students based on their academic results, like judging fish
by its ability to climb a tree. To make a fair evaluation, everyone should be judged based on their
unique abilities.