Professional Documents
Culture Documents
inclusive sport.
It seems logical that by ensuring all are treated equally we can make inclusion
happen in any setting. In sport, if we treat everyone equally then this means we
ensure everyone gets the same resources, same support, same information, same
equipment, same choices, same coaching, same rules, same facilities, same
pathways etc. After all treating everyone the same is fair and this leads to
inclusion, right?
Now, if we consider the social model of inclusion that says the disadvantage a
person faces is attributed the barriers presented by the world around them
(physical, social, cultural etc.) and not from their own intrinsic characteristics (such
as impairment, age, gender, culture etc.). Then the question arises, is pursuing
equality a true solution for achieving inclusion? Perhaps there’s more to it.
This image presents a metaphor. The fence represents a barrier, limitation or
threshold that impacts true inclusion. In this case the goal is everyone being
able to watch the baseball game. The boxes represent the resources and
supports available which could be used to overcome the disadvantage faced.
This illustrates the idea that equality is all about making sure everyone gets treated
the same. In this case everyone gets a single box each; everyone gets the same
resources and supports. That’s equal. Intuitively this seems to be an approach that
leads to fairness or does it? The middle spectator can see the game and is now
included, while (despite receiving equal treatment) the smaller spectator still
cannot see the game and remains excluded. However, they both remain at a
disadvantage to the tallest spectator who has an even better view than before. Is
this fair? Have we achieved true inclusion for everyone? In this situation we are
limited by the availability of boxes (resources and supports) so for inclusion to be
achieved for everyone more resources or supports are required. In real life this is
not always possible and doesn’t guarantee that the disadvantage will be addressed.
Imagine if the fence was built even higher!
In this case the two shortest spectators are given enough boxes to see over the
fence. Now everyone can see the game. This illustrates the idea of equity.
Equity is all about ensuring everyone gets what they need. Is this fair? Have
we achieved true inclusion for everyone? In this case you could argue yes!
But what if there were only two boxes? Or only one box? Could we still allocate
resources in a fair way and address the barriers and achieve inclusion? Equity
relies on having enough resources to go round and assumes they can be shared.
Is this fair, is everyone included and does this address the underlying
disadvantage? Achieving liberation assumes the barriers and thresholds can be
removed completely, however this may or may not be possible in every situation
for everybody.
Image source: Interaction Institute for Social Change | Artist: Angus Maguire.