Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/259636287
CITATIONS READS
17 927
5 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Laser welding of Alunium alloys and Magnesium-rare earth alloys View project
All content following this page was uploaded by ZhuGuo Li on 11 September 2014.
The microstructural evolution of laser-welded 960 MPa grade high strength steel joints and its effect on
softening behavior of heat affected zone (HAZ) were investigated in this paper. The results show that
microstructure of HAZ and fusion zone (FZ) is composed of lath martensite and bainitic ferrite. The
microstructure of mixed grained zone presents strip-like characteristics and small block martensite dis-
tributes along the grain boundary. The grain size near the fusion line is about 25 lm, and the grain size in
the fine grain zone is less than 5 lm. Microhardness of HAZ and FZ is lower than base metal. The soft zone
locates in transitional region between tempering zone and mixed grained zone due to the interaction of the
martensite tempering and the recovery and recrystallization of the rolled microstructure. Microhardness of
soft zone is 310 HV and drops 18% compared to base material. Welding heat input has a remarkable effect
on the width of soft zone and microhardness. The tensile properties of weld joints are closely related to the
softening behavior of HAZ.
Fig. 1 Geometry and dimensions of tensile test specimens used in Fig. 3 The morphology and distribution of typical bainite ferrite in
the present study (in mm) the FZ
Fig. 2 Light micrographs and scanning electron micrographs of welded joint under different zones. (a) Low magnification OM images of wel-
ded joint, (b) microstructures of welded joint observed by OM and SEM
Fig. 5 TEM images of different area of welded joint: (a) BM, (b) HAZ, (c) FZ, and (d) EDS spectrum from the precipitate
Fig. 9 Typical SEM images of tensile fracture surface of welded joints. (a) The edge zone, (b) the central zone
growth of austenite grains in the high peak temperature. microhardness is in BM, and the lowest microhardness occurs in
Figure 5(a)-(c) shows the martensite lath obtained from the transitional region between TZ and MGZ. Compared to that of
TEM observation of different areas of welded joint and second weld metal, high microhardness of BM is contributed to rolling
phase particles morphology of BM. As shown in Fig. 5, deformation and fine lath martensite. The coarse grains of HAZ
martensite lath can be observed clearly, and the widths of and FZ and the recrystallization of rolling microstructures cause
martensite lath in HAZ and FZ are about 100 nm. In BM, microhardness of HAZ and FZ to reduce.
plenty of second phase particles distribute on martensite lath, In the HAZ, there exists a significant microhardness drop
and the particles in HAZ and FZ are not observed. Figure 5(d) called ‘‘soft zone’’ as indicated in Fig. 6(a), in comparison with
shows EDS spectrum analysis from the precipitate. EDS other regions of welded joint. As shown in Fig. 6(a), the
chemical analysis on the particles shows that the particles is microhardness from TZ to MGZ decreases firstly and increases
rich in Ti and Nb, and the constitution of the particles is subsequently and the lowest microhardness locates at the
speculated as (Ti, Nb) (C, N). Most of the fine precipitates in interface between TZ and MGZ. The lowest microhardness
the matrix tend to dissolve due to welding thermal cycles, and value is 310 HV and drops 18% compared to BM. The
lose the action of pinning the austenite grain boundaries during microhardness of TZ is lower than BM due to the tempering of
welding, leading to grain coarsen (Ref 27). martensite. The microhardness decreases as the tempering
temperature and the tempered time increases. The recovery and
recrystallization of martensite occur in MGZ and result in
3.2 Mechanical Properties
microhardness of MGZ increasing. Therefore, the microhardness
3.2.1 Microhardness. Microhardness distribution across of transitional region between TZ to MGZ is lowest. Moreover,
the weld zone was exhibited in Fig. 6. As shown in Fig. 6(a), the the distribution of microstructure in soft zone is unevenly and
microhardness of welded joints is in the order of BM > FZ > small block martensite forms in grain boundary, which further
HAZ. In past works, the maximum microhardness and minimum deteriorates the mechanical properties of the soft zone.
microhardness of high strength steel joints are located in the weld As shown in Fig. 6(b), the microhardness distribution away
metal and HAZ, respectively (Ref 16-19). In the test, the highest 2 mm lower surface of sample is consistent with the upper part.