/l

I
( (c

AC's CHECKLIST IN DESIGN EVALlJATION REPORT

Project Title _
__

Project Reference No: ST _________

Name of AC:

Name of PE assisting AC:

Highest Qualification Total years of

Name of engineers assisting AC
Name of Universitv design experience

I
'
L__ ------�---·--�- - - - - - --
- --- - - --·-�------·--·--- �--------- - -·- ------�----------- ___L_ J
---�···-----------------�--
I

PART 1\_:- OV"F:RA I J, OFSJ(;N RKVIFW TASKS

For the design check on the building or stmctures in this submission, I confirm that I have
evaluated, analyzed and reviewed the foundation and stmctural design with a view to
determining their stmctural adequacy. Besides other tasks, I have specifically performed the
following tasks and have found that the building or structures designed are stmcturally
adequate and safe:-

(I) Codes Of Practice

-used appropriate codes for the design check

(U) Design Loadings

-checked that loadings used in design are appropriate and adequate

-used appropriate load combinations to check the design

(III)

-used appropriate engineering information and models in the analysis

-ascertained the design assumptions and limitations of the computer programs used
which preferably should be different from that used by the design QP

(IV) Stability & Robustness

BEV/A3 Page l of 12
!Ver 3.0_Dec_20l4j
 -detennined the stability and robustness of the structural system, including

considerations for lateral loads. lateral ties, bracings and lateral transfer of loads

(V) All Key Structural Elements

-analysed and checked the design of all key structural elements and the foundation

svstem

(VI) Stmctural Drawings

-checked that the detailings m drawings of all key stmctural elements are adequate

and consistent with the intentions in design calculations

(VH) Other 1\sperts in De-.ign

-detennined the adequacy of other aspects of design which are peculiar to the building

to be constructed or affected by the building works and which are essential to the

structural integrity of the building

Part B:- FOUNDATION & STRliCTURI\.L ELEMENTS

For the following foundation and structural elements or structures, besides other engineering
considerations made by me, I have specifically carried out all the tasks as described in the
table below and confinned that their designs are structurally adequate and safe:-

BEV/A3 Page 2 of 12
[Ver 3.0_Dec_20l41
 (I) Foundation

Please tick one: Applicable Not Applicable

1
!
Foundation Specific Design Tasks Carried Out Applicable (� ) I
NotL\pplicable (�)_
l 1

I
\---------�-------------- - - - ·---�----- ----

• Appropriate values of dead. live , \\ ind and notional loads

have been used
i
---- -- .... I
• Column loads have been appropriately computed
....
17�,.,....,..,...1...,..,.: _...
_I_' UUllUi:tllUU

loads • Effects of\vind and notional loads on the building or

structure have been checked

• Comparison of the loading computat1on by the QP &

A...C has been carried out

•
--jI
Piles have been designed for skin f:rictwn and end

I
bearing capacities

• Piles have been designed for lateral loads and bending

moment
I
• Pile JOints have been designed for I

iI
Piles
• Piles have been designed for uplift

• Socketings nave been designed for piles with short I

penetration depths

• Piles have been designed for negative skin friction

• Appropnate allowable bearing capacitv of sml has been

assumed in design

• Appropriate modulus of sub-grade reaction of the soil

has been assumed m design

Raft
• Appropriate model used for structural analysis of the raft I
-:
• The raft has been designed to resist punching shear from
columns
1
I
..

I
• The building or structure has been designed to cater for
prnb:>.ble differential and total settlement
I

DLV/_r-\.J
nr-,;:r/4.""'

Pag� 3 of 12
[Ver 3.0_Dec_2014]
 (II) Building i Structural Systems

(a) Building of less than 30 Storeys

Please tick one: Applicable Not Applicable

Appiicabie (-.J) i
Items Specific Design Tasks Carried Out
Not Applicable (X)

(i) / Designed for 'vind loads

- +� 1
·· · " · - ---··-

i
Des1gned tor notwnal loads

(iii)
Stability system has been identified and evaluated to be adequate
and robust
..
I
i
Designed corewalls and columns to resist latera! loads due to wind I
and notional loads in both directions

(v) Provided adequate internal and peripheral ties at floor levels

Destgned for �.:apacities to resi:,t base o-vertuinin� woment ai!d

(vi)
base shear

(vii) Designed for building sway (p-delta diect)

T"\T"'""'{1']4'"';
LJLV/r\..J
Page 4 of 12
fVer 3.0_Dec_2014]
(b) Building of 30 Storeys or bighe1·

Please iick one Applicable Not Apphcable

Applicable ( '</) I
Specific Design Tasks Carried Out Not Applicable (X)

[ Designed for wind loads i

-I
I

( Destgned for notional loads

·· ·I

: Stabilitv svstem has been identtfied and evaluated to be adequate

I and robust
.I
I
Designed corewalls and columns to resist lateral loads due to wind I
and notional loads in both directions

Provided adequate internal and peripheral ties at floor levels

Designed for capacities to resist base overturning moment and

base shear

I
·

Designed for building sway (p-delta etTect) I

Designed to hmit overall lateral deflection of building

-I I
I

- - --- ..... ···j

(ix) Designed to limit inter-storey drift of building I
!

(x)

·
·
· +
Columns and walls have been checked for resistance to dynamic
e±Tects due to wind on the building

· ····· · ·· · · ·· ·
I
i
I
(xi) Checked for Requirements for Wind Tunnel Tests

I
(xii)
Checked for long term lateral de±1ection of buildim; under gravitv
1Aorl
l.VUV
� � �
I

Page 5 of 12
fVer 3.0_Dec_2014]
(c) Building with Stntctural Steel Elements

Please tick one. Applicable Not Applicable

Applicable(;}) I
Items Specific Design Tasks Carried Out Not Applicable (X)

Designed for bolted and welded connections of supports and

(i)
member and splice joints
------------ ------ -- --�
Checked for in-plane and out-of-plane stability of frames
I1
----

i
Des1gned fOr brac1ngs and long1tudinal ties for overall stab1lity
I
-j
J
Designed for \vind load on the building/structure

I
Designed for lateral stability and torsional rigidity of structural
( v)
elements and trusses
!
Support conditions assumed in design have been checked agamst
details provided
I
1
Type ofjomt connections provided between members are
conststent with JOint rigidity adopted in the analysts and design i

(d) Building with Precast Concrete Elements

Please tick one: Applicable Not Applicable

Items Applicable( -\f ) I

Specific Design Tasks Carried Out
Not Applicable (X)

-----------+--------�---------------1
J JOmt connections between
A,J I
{�'
\l
precast members <md precast to in-
l
s1tu concrete memb er s have been des1gned for

Loading conditions on precast members during erection or

(ii)
construction stage have been considered

r:: ., Sufficient rigidity in the structural frame has been proYided for to
\)il)
resist lateral loads

(iv) Adequate mternal & peripheral ties have been provided in floors

(v) All interface shear stresses have been checked

(vi) Detailing of precast elements and structural JOints have been

checked

T)"l'""!"7!4,...,
DLV/l""l..J
Page 6 of 12
[Ver 3.0_Dec_2014]
 (e) Building with Prestressed Concrete Structures

Please tick one Applicablt: Not ApplH.:able

Applicable (..J) I
Items Specific Design Tasks Carried Out
Not Applicable (X)

(i)
! Maximum prestress force and prestress losses for prestressed
j elements have been computed according to code requirements II
- f-
·-··- ---
-- I
1
(ii)
i
Stresses for elements have been checked at transfer and service
stages I
i
-+

I
Shear capacny has been designed for in prestressed elements

For transfer beams and long span beams, consideration of stage

(iv)
stressing has been made in des1gn
I
i
{v \
\ ., End block des1gn has been checked

Details of prestressed elements, tendon profile, etc. have been

(vi)
checked

(f) Building with Complex Structural Svstems

Please tick one: Applicable Not Applicable

To contact BCA for

Items Structural Systems consultation('./) I
Not Applicable (X)

(i) : each carrvmg at least 3 floors; or structural svstem with

i ; ;
cantil eve tr nsfer element carrving more th�n 5 floors
I
(ii)
[
--- - · --- - - - - - -- -- ---- -- - - _. -

! Inclined or curved building (offset of floor plate more than 3m

--- - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - -
I
! from the edge of the floor above or below)
I
I
Structures vv·ith unconventional geometry (e.g. dome or arch-
(iii)

Large spa11 structures (with span more than 40m) or large I

(iv) . cantilever span structures (where cantilever span is more than
I
I 8m)

•
[Ver 3.0_Dec_2014]
 (Ill) Specific Structural Elements

Please tick one _'\pplicable U Not Applicable

Locations in
Applicable(" ) I
Structural Building
Specific Design tasks carried out Not Applicable (X)
Elements (specify the
storey levels or
reference grids)

• Effective height has been

computed according to code

:• Bending moment about minor

axis has been designed for

Slender Columns +

,• Additional bending moment due

ro slenderness has bt:en Jestgned
for

• Biaxial bending moment has

been designed for

i Columns
:• Designed for bending moment
i supporting
due to frame action
I transfer beams

! Columns
• Designed for bending moment
! supporting long
due to :frame action
i span beams

i
i Columns • Designed for bending moment
i supporting due to frame action
: caniiiever beams
l

1
i• Designed for horizontal load and '
moment acting on columns due
to arched or pitched roof

Coiumns in a two
--l

J I
• Designed for bending moment at
column frame
the column base
system

I
\
I
I

'
� ' ----- � '
- �--------�_______ _j

I•
r>r-..;r'""'
DCV!fi.J
Page 8 of12
[Ver 3.0_Dec_2014]
 I
I

Locations in
Applicable (v ) I
Structural Building

I
Specific Design tasks carried out �ot Applicable {X)
Elements* I (specify the
I storey levels or ,

! reference grids) �
: !
• Cantilever suppon has been
designed to resist bending
i
moment and shear I
1- �

!
i Cantilever beams • Designed for lateral stability of I
beam
l

1
.. +- -- -
• Designed to meet allowable span !

I
depth ratio

; • Torsional rigtdity of beam has

been checked
----- -- i

I
Designed for lateral restraint of

I
beams
I
-1--
Long span beams !
-- ­

: • Designed for support and

�ember connections
i' - j
I
',
• Designed to meet allowable span
I

depth ratio

• Designed for torsional capacity

----- ---
-- --

;• Designed for shear capacity

I
j
I
. . Designed for all relevant upper I

floor loads on the beam

·-- - - - - -- ------ - i
I
i
• Designed for lateral restraint of lI
beam
-j
Transfer beams

• Transfer Beam supporting !

sloping members designed for

hoth in-phme :=md ont-of-pl<1ne
forces

• Comparison bending moments

and shear forces computation by
QP & AC carried out

-- (' "t,.....
rage:;
T\_-_ --- . "
Vi lk

[Ver 3.0_Dec_2014]
 Locations in
I
Applicable (-v)
Structural Building
Specific Design tasks carried out Not Applicable (X)
Elements* (specify the

1 reference
1 storey levels or
rids)

· • Appropriate rnodel used for

analysis

. . Span/depth ratio of slab has been

checked i
I
i
!
• Adequacy of top and bottom i

reinforcement throughout slab I I

•
panel have been checked
---r---
i
'11
Flat slabs/plates Designed to resist punching

I•
shear from columns and walls

Openmgs m slabs, especmlly

l····· ···· -··· -iI
1

near columns, have been

�esignedJ() r

l I
_

!• Torsional rigidity at slab edges

has been checked
T 1
1

I
• Effects of construction loads
h�����ed
-- -1-
I
t-- j
I
- '--- -- --- - ----- - - ___, ------- ---------

• Destgned tie-back anchorage to

resist _rull-out __ _
_
_ _

J 1
I
_

I
• Designed for lateral stability of
Cantilevered the structure
I
structures with
tie-backs • Designed for the durability of the
tie-backs
I
t
' • Designed for redundancy to I

resist total collapse

I

fVer 3.0_Dec_2014] Page;:; 10 of 12

 (IV) Earth Retaining Structures

Please tick one· Applicable Not Applicable

Items Specific Design tasks carried out

Applicable (.._J
Not Applicable (X)
��- ,

!
•

Geotechnical parameters adopted for design of ERSS are

(i)
consistent with site mvestigation report and published literature
I
.. j
I
Stmcture has been designed to resist overturning , sliding and I
bearing capacity failure I
I
· · · · ···-··· ....... .. ...... ····I

-- _j
(iii) Stmcture has been designed to resist slip circle failure

0..,._,__ _ _.__ _ �·�1"'�-l� -�---- J��:�-�--_j c_ .. -�--- - -- ___ :1 -,- -1

�-,---�-'- -- ..,..-

Jll ULlUlC lld� UCCH ut::�H�HC:U lUi VUCIUU� :")\Jll d.UU \lVQ.lC! l)U�;:;:)�UlC
--�·---- - · �-
I
l
(iv)
acting on it

(v) Adequate surcharge load has been taken into account in design

ERSS checked for global stability, wall embedment. toe-stability,

(vi)
base heave and hydraulic uplift

Opening ( ser�-ice openings in v.;all)� discontinuity i� temper&�,.-

retaining \Valls has been checked for stability

----� - - ------ ---··· .. ----- iI

Comparison of member forces computation for walls. struts. waler
(viii)
and kingposts by QP & AC has been carried out.

Pagellof12
[Ver 3.0_Dec_2014]

•
 Part C: - MA.TOR SHORTCOMINGS DETECTED DURING CHECKING

i Major Mistakes I Design . Changes made by QP Due to My

i�.Sht!�o�in�Deiected During Checking j__
.
_ ___ Checkit_!g_ ___ �----

, I
-------· ·-·--·-·-· ---·-· -- --·-j --- -- --- --- - -------------- --1
I

Part D: - OTHER COMMENTS BY AC

I hereby certified that I have specifically carried out all the tasks for the foundation and
snuctural design as described in the tables above and confinned that their design are
structurally adequate and safe.

Signature & stamp of AC: Date:

BEV/A3 Page 12 of 12
[Ver 3.0_Dec_2014j