Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COURSE SYLLABUS
I. GENERAL PRINCIPLES
a. Policy Reforms under R.A. 10863
b. Tariff
c. Kinds of Tariff
d. Customs Duties
e. Free Zones
f. Purpose of imposition
Cases:
Garcia vs. Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 101273
Nestle Philippines vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 134114
Cases:
Boac vs. People, G.R. No. 180597
Agriex Co. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs, G.R. No. 158150
Commissioner of Customs vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. Nos. 111202-05
Commissioner of Customs vs. Hypermix Feeds Corporation, G.R. No. 179579
Hon. Executive Secretary vs. Southwing Heavy Industries, Inc., G.R. No. 164171
III. GOODS
a. Concept of Goods for Customs Duty
b. Kinds of Goods
Cases
Commissioner of Customs vs. Capistrano, G.R. No. L-11075
Bastida vs. Commissioner of Customs, G.R. No. L-24011
b. Specific Duty
B. Special Duties
a. Anti-Dumping Duty
b. Countervailing Duty
c. Marking Duty
d. Discriminatory Duty
e. Safeguard Duty
f.
Cases:
Nestle Philippines vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 134114
CIR vs. Pilipinas Shell Petroleum, G.R. No. 188497
V. FLEXIBLE CLAUSE
a. Basis
b. Requisites for the Exercise of Power
c. Exceptions
d. Effectivity of Order issued by the President
e. Preferential Tariff
f. Tariff Barrier
Cases:
Feeder International Line vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 94262
Papa vs. Mago, G.R. No. L-27360
Chevron PHL, Inc. vs. Commissioner of Customs, G.R. No. 178759
e. Keeping of records
X. TAX REMEDIES
I. Tax Remedies of the Government:
A. Administrative Remedies
1. Compulsory Acquisition
2. Reduction of Customs duties and compromise
3. Alert orders
Effect of issuance of alert orders
Action after examination
Basic considerations on alert orders
What may be considered as derogatory information
4. Seizure and Forfeiture
Property subject to seizure and forfeiture
Jurisdiction
Reasons for exclusive jurisdiction upon the Collector of Customs
Nature of forfeiture proceedings
When forfeiture can be effected
Requisites for customs forfeiture
Forfeiture of common carrier
Prima Facie presumption of knowledge by the owner of the common carrier
Burden of proof in seizure and forfeiture proceedings
5. Distraint of personal property
Procedure for distraint
Constructive distraint of personal property
How constructive distraint of personal property can be effected
6. Levy of Real Property
Procedure for Levy
B. Judicial Remedies
Cases:
Commissioner of Customs vs. Pascual, 138 SCRA 581
Gako vs. Commissioner of Customs 344, SCRA 178
Republic vs. Court of First Instance of Manila, G.R. No. 43747
Rigor vs. Rosales, G.R. No. L-33756
Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority vs. Rodriguez, G.R. No. 160270
Jao vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 104604
Republic vs. Sandiganbayam, G.R. No. 152154
Transglobe Internation Inc., vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 126634
Almeda, Sr., et. al. vs. Perez, et. al., G.R. No. L-18428
Commissioner of Customs vs. Court of Tax Appeals, G.R. No. L-31733
People vs. Desiderio, G.R. No. L-20805
Farolan, Jr. vs. Court of Tax Appeals, G.R. No. 42204
Republic vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 139050
Alemanya International Trading Corp. vs. Commissioner of Customs, CTA Case No.
4389
II. Tax Remedies of the Taxpayer
A. Administrative Remedies
1. Protest
When protest may arise
When protest may be made
Protest exclusive remedy in protestable case
Amount protested may or may not be paid at the time of protest
Form and scope of protest
Decision in protest
Decision adverse to the government
2. Refund (Abatement or drawback)
Abatement
Claim for abatement
Refund
Grant of refund
Denial of refund
Claim for refund
Instances when abatement or refund is allowed
When abatement and refund is allowed
Drawback
B. Judicial Remedies
1. Appeal
2. Filing of criminal action against erring customs officials
Cases:
Yaokasin vs. Commissioner of Customs, G.R. No. 84111
Transglobe Internation Inc., vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 126634
Pilipinas Shell Corporation vs. Commissioner of Customs, G.R. No. 195876
References:
1. Principles and Remedies in the Customs Modernization and Tariff Act (Atty. Joseph Romano);
2. R.A. 10863 (Customs Modernization and Tariff Act);
3. Cases provided.