Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Welcome Notes:
WELCOME CRIMINOLOGY STUDENTS
I. INTRODUCTION:
This module introduces the definitions of Criminal Behavior, origin of criminal behavior, human
Intelligence, Criminal Law and Intelligence and the Revised Penal Code of the Philippines. These
include the topics on Criminal Behavior and Intelligence, the Binet Scale of Human Intelligence, the
McNaughton Rule of Criminal law, the Durham Rule and the ALI Substantial Capacity test.
II. OBJECTIVES:
Before you proceed to the main lesson, let’s complete this activity.
Crimsoc 3:Human Behavior and Victimology
https://
www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9tDVJ-VLG0
GREAT!!!
You may now proceed to the main lesson.
LET’S BEGIN!
Based on the preliminary activities, what did you notice about it?
________________________________________________________
CONGRATULATIONS!
CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR
It refers to conduct of an offender that leads to and including the commission of an unlawful act.
It refers to behavior, which is criminal in nature; a behavior which violates the law.
According to Goldoozian, for Human behavior to be considered as a crime, three elements are necessary:
1. Legally, the criminal act should be prohibited by law.
2. Materially, the criminal act should be executed or realized.
3. Spiritually, the criminal act should be accompanied by criminal intention or guilt. These 3 elements
must be present for an act to be labeled as a crime.
HUMAN INTELLIGENCE
mental quality that consists of the abilities to learn from experience, adapt to new
situations,
Stanford–Binet Fifth Edition (SB5) classification[5] understand and
handle abstract
concepts, and
IQ Range ("deviation IQ") IQ Classification use knowledge to
manipulate.
145–160 Very gifted or highly advanced
Moderately impaired or
40–54
delayed
Crimsoc 3:Human Behavior and Victimology
commission and, therefore, criminally responsible for the wrongdoing. The M'Naghten rule is a test for
criminal insanity.
It is a test for criminal insanity. Under the M'Naghten rule, a criminal defendant is not guilty by
reason of insanity if, at the time of the alleged criminal act, the defendant was so deranged that she did not
know the nature or quality of her actions or, if she knew the nature and quality of her actions, she was so
deranged that she did not know that what she was doing was wrong.
You may visit the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8_PhK3UOL8 for the related video.
The Durham Rule or "product test" was adopted by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit in 1954, in the case of Durham v. U.S. (214 F.2d 862), and states that "... an accused is
not criminally responsible if his unlawful act was the product of mental disease or defect". Durham was later
overturned in the case U.S. v. Brawner, 471 F.2d 969 (1972). After the 1970s, U.S. jurisdictions have
tended to not recognize this argument as it places emphasis on "mental disease or defect" and thus on
testimony by psychiatrists and is argued to be somewhat ambiguous.
You may visit the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0b3zhKuOsYE for the related video about
article 12: Circumstances which exempt from criminal liability.