CHAPTER -IV

DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

1) Gender:

Table 4.1

NO.OF
Gende RESPONDENT PERCENTAG
S.NO r S E
1 Male 41 82
Femal
2 e 9 18
3 Total 50 100

Figure 4.1

Chart Title
NO.OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

82 18 100

41 9 50

Male Female Total

1 2 3

INTERPRETTION ;

The above diagram describes that 82% of the respondents are male and 18% of the
respondents are female
 2. Marital status:
Table 4.2

NO.OF
marital RESPONDENT PERCENTAG
S.NO status S E
1 married 38 76
2 unmarried 12 24
3 Total 50 100

Figure 4.2

Chart Title
NO.OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

100

76

50
38
24
12

married unmarried Total

1 2 3

INTERPRETTION ;

The above diagram describes that 76% of the respondents are married and 24% of the
respondents are unmarried.
 3. nature of employees:
Table 4.3

NO.OF
RESPONDENT PERCENTAG
S.NO employees S E
1 permanent 17 34
2 temporary 33 66
3 Total 50 100

Figure 4.3

Chart Title
NO.OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

100
66
34

33 50
17

permanent
1 temporary
2 Total
3

INTERPRETTION ;

The above diagram describes that 64% of the respondents are temporary and 34% of
the respondents are permanent .
 4. Age :

Table 4.4

NO.OF
RESPONDENT PERCENTAG
S.NO Age S E
1 above 25 15 30
2 26 -35 14 28
3 35-45 12 24
4 above 46 9 18
5 total 50 100

Figure 4.4

Chart Title
NO.OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

100

30 28 24 50
18
15 14 12 9
above 25 26 -35 35-45 above 46 total
1 2 3 4 5

INTERPRETION;

The above diagram describes that 30% of the respondents age was 25below
and 28% of the respondents age 26-35 years. 24% of the respondents 35-45
years. 18% of the respondents age 46 above.
 5. Qualification :

Table 4.5

NO.OF
qualificatio RESPONDEN PERCENTAG
S.NO n TS E
1 below 10th 24 48
2 10th -12th 19 38
3 UG 3 6
4 PG 2 4
5 Diploma 2 4
6 total 50 100

Figure 4.5

Chart Title
NO.OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

48 38 6 4 4 100

24 19 3 2 2 50

below 10th 10th -12th UG PG Diploma total

1 2 3 4 5 6

INTERPRETION;
 The above diagram describes that 48% of the respondents was below 10th and
38% of the respondents was 10th -12th. 6% of the respondents was UG. 4% of
the respondents was PG. and 4% of the respondents was diploma.

6.expreience :

Table 4.6

NO.OF
RESPONDENT PERCENTAG
S.NO experience S E
1 below 5- years 22 44
2 6-10 years 11 22
3 11-12 years 9 18
4 above 21years 8 16
5 total 50 100

Figure 4.6

Chart Title
NO.OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

100

44
22 18 50
22 16
11 9 8
below 5- years 6-10 years 11-12 years above 21years total
1 2 3 4 5

INTERPRETION;
 The above diagram describes that 44% of the respondents was below 5 years
experience and 22% of the respondents was 6-10 years experience. 18% of the
respondents was11-12 years experience. and 16% of the respondents was above
21 years experience.

7. income:

Table 4.7

NO.OF
RESPONDENT PERCENTAG
S.NO income S E
1 below 10000 27 54
10000 to
2 20000 13 26
3 20000-30000 7 14
4 above 30000 3 6
5 total 50 100

Figure 4.7

Chart Title
NO.OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

100

54
26 50
27 13 14
7 6
3
below 10000 10000 to 20000-30000 above 30000 total
20000
1 2 3 4 5
INTERPRETION;

The above diagram describes that 54% of the respondents was below 10000 in
monthly income and 26% of the respondents was 10000-20000 in monthly
income. 14% of the respondents was 20000-30000 in monthly income. and 6%
of the respondents was above 30000 in month income.

8. how many paid employees (full time or part time) work for your
organization.
Table 4.8

NO.OF
RESPONDENT PERCENTAG
S.NO employees S E
1 01 to 10 19 38
2 11 to 30 12 24
3 31- 60 11 22
4 61-100 5 10
5 100+ 3 6
6 total 50 100

Figure 4.8

Chart Title
NO.OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

100

38
24
22 50
19
12 10
11 6
5
3
01 to 10
1 11 to 30
2 31- 60
3 61-100
4 100+
5 total
6
INTERPRETION;

The above diagram describes that 38% of the respondents was 01-10
employees and 24% of the respondents was 11-30 employees. 22% of the
respondents was31-60 in employees. and 10% of the respondents was 61-100
in employees.6% of the respondents was 100+ in employee.

9. where is your organization :

Table 4.9

NO . OF
ORGANIZATI RESPONDE PERCENTA
s.no ON NT GE
1 RURAL 35 70
2 URBAN 15 30
3 TOTAL 50 100

FIGURE 4.9

Chart Title
NO . OF RESPONDENT PERCENTAGE

100
70

30
35
50
15

RURAL
1 URBAN
2 TOTAL
3

INTERPRETTION ;
 The above diagram describes that 70% of the respondents are Rural of
organization and 30% of the respondents are urban of organization.

10. what best describes your roe at the organization:

Table 4.10

NO .OF
RESPONDENT PERCENTAG
S. NO ORGANIZATION S E
1 Executive director 14 28
2 director 14 28
3 human resources 12 24
4 operation 6 12
5 other 4 8
6 total 50 100

Figure 4.10

Chart Title
S. NO ORGANIZATION
NO .OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

12 8
28 28 24 100

4
6 0
14 12 50
14 0 5
0 4
0
1 0
2 3 0
6
1 2 3 4 5 6
INTERPRETION;

The above diagram describes that 28% of the respondents was Executive director
and 28% of the respondents was director. 24% of the respondents was human
resources. and 12% of the respondents was operation. 8% of the respondents was
other organizations.

11. how many years has your organization been in operation:

Table 4.11

operatio percentag
s.no n no.of respondents e
1 0 to 2 15 30
2 2 to 4 13 26
3 4 to 6 12 24
4 6 to 8 6 12
5 10+ 4 8
6 total 50 100

Figure 4.11

Chart Title
no.of respondents percentage

100

30
26
24 50
15 12
13
12 8
6
4
0 to 2
1 2 to 4
2 4 to 6
3 6 to 8
4 10+
5 total
6
INTERPRETION;

The above diagram describes that 30% of the respondents was 0-2 in the operation
and 26% of the respondents was2-4 in the operation. 24% of the respondents was4-6
in the operation. and 12% of the respondents was 6-8 in the operation. 8% of the
respondents was 10+ in the operation.

12. what is the annual operating budget of your organization

Table 4.12

no. of
responden percentag
s.no annual operation ts e
1 500,000 or less 16 32
2 500,000-1000000 14 28
1000000-
3 5000000 10 20
more then
4 5000000 10 20
5 total 50 100

Figure 4.12

Chart Title
160
140
120
100
80
Axis Title
60
40
20
0
500,000 or 500,000- 1000000- more then total
less 1000000 5000000 5000000
1 2 3 4 5
INTERPRETION;

The above diagram describes that 32% of the respondents was 500,000 or less
and 28% of the respondents was 500,000-1000000 in the operation. 20% of the
respondents was 1000000-5000000 in the operation. and 20% of the respondents was
more then 5000000 in the operation.

13. what is the your organization type :

Table 4.13

NO.OF
RESPONDENT PERCENTAG
S.NO ORGANIZATION TYPE S E
1 For - profit 22 44
2 non - profit 18 36
3 effective altruism organization 10 20
4 animal charity 6 12
5 other 4 8
6 total 50 100

Figure 4.13

Chart Title
NO.OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
100
44 36
22 18 20 12
10 6 8 50
4
For - profit

effective altrusium organizati

non - profit

animal charity
-

total
other
ion

1 2 3 4 5 6

INTERPRETION;
The above diagram describes that 44% of the respondents was for – profit other
organization type. and 36% of the respondents was non- profit other organization type.
20% of the respondents was effective altruism other organization type. and 12% of
the respondents was animal charity in the organization type.. 8% of the respondents was
other organization type.

14. are salaries for remote employees determined non- remoted employees:

Table 4.14

no.of
employe responde percenta
s. no es nts ge
1 yes 35 70
2 no 15 30
3 total 50 100

Figure 4.14

Chart Title
no.of respondents percentage

100
70

30
35 50
15

yes
1 no
2 total
3

INTERPRETTION ;
The above diagram describes that 70% of the respondents are yes in the non remote
employees and 30% of the respondents are no in the non remote employees.

15. does your compensation strategy include measures to account for

issues of pay equity :

Table 4.15

no.of
strateg responden percenta
s.no y ts ge
1 yes 30 60
2 no 20 40
3 total 50 100

Figure 4.15

Chart Title
no.of respondents percentage

60 40 100

30 20 50

yes no total
1 2 3
INTERPRETTION ;

The above diagram describes that 60% of the respondents are yes in the strategy
employees and 40% of the respondents are no in the strategy employees

16. has your organization made any recent change in terms of

compensation or do you plan no making change in the near futre;

Table 4.16

no.of
organizati responde percenta
s.no on nts ge
1 yes 40 80
2 no 10 20
3 total 50 100

Figure 4.16

Chart Title
no.of respondents percentage

100
80

40 20 50
10

yes no total
1 2 3
INTERPRETTION ;

The above diagram describes that 80% of the respondents are yes in the organization
and 20% of the respondents are no in the organizations.

17. does employs recognition through given of shopping vouchers praise and trophies
etc ensure employees productivity:

Table 4.17

no.of
voucher responden percenta
s.no s ts ge
1 yes 23 46
someho
2 w 17 34
3 not sure 6 12
4 no 4 8
5 total 50 100

figure 4.17
 Chart Title
no.of respondents percentage

100

46 50
34
23
17
12 8
6 4
yes somehow not sure no total
1 2 3 4 5

INTERPRETTION ;

The above diagram describes that 46% of the respondents was yes in the vouchers. and
34% of the respondents was somehow in the vouchers 12% of the respondents was not
sure in the vouchers. and 8% of the respondents was No in the vouchers.

18. what could be the impact of mixing th financial and non financial reward when compensating
employees.

Table 4.18

no.of
reponden percentag
s.no financial ts e
1 great impact 25 50
normal
2 impact 15 30
3 less impact 10 20
4 total 50 100

Figure 4.18
 Chart Title
no.of repondents percentage

100

50
30 50
20
25 15 10
great impact normal impact less impact total
1 2 3 4

INTERPRETION;

The above diagram describes that 50% of the respondents was great impact of
financial and 30% of the respondents was normal impact of financial. 20% of
the respondents was less impact of financial.

19.career development ;

Table 4.19

no of
developme responden percentag
s.no nt ts e
great
1 extent 25 50
normal
2 extent 15 30
3 little extent 6 12
4 no effect 4 8
5 total 50 100
 Figure 4.19

Chart Title
no of respondents percentage

100

50
30 50
25 15 12 8
6 4
great entent normal extent little extent no effect total
1 2 3 4 5

INTERPRETION;

The above diagram describes that 50% of the respondents was great extent of
development and 30% of the respondents was normal extern of the
development. 12% of the respondents was little extent of the development . 8%
of the respondents was no effect in the development.

20. better working:

Table 4.20

no of
responden percentag
s. no better working ts e
1 strongly agree 20 40
2 agree 15 30
3 disagree 10 20
strongly
4 disagree 5 10
 5 total 50 100

Figure 4.20

Chart Title
no of respondents percentage

100

50
40
30
20 15 20
10 5 10

strongly agree agree disagree strongly total

disagree
1 2 3 4 5

INTERPRETION;

The above diagram describes that 40% of the respondents was strongly agree in
the work and 30% of the respondents was agree in the work. 20% of the
respondents was disagree in the work. 10% of the respondents was strongly
disagree in the work.