0% found this document useful (0 votes)
121 views1 page

Peer Evaluation Form for Group Projects

The document provides a peer evaluation form for students to assess each other's contributions to a group project. The form includes spaces for the student's name, role, and a 5-point rating scale for various criteria such as participation, willingness to discuss ideas, enthusiasm, leadership, and familiarity with material. Students and a class representative will complete evaluations and provide a total score for each peer.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
121 views1 page

Peer Evaluation Form for Group Projects

The document provides a peer evaluation form for students to assess each other's contributions to a group project. The form includes spaces for the student's name, role, and a 5-point rating scale for various criteria such as participation, willingness to discuss ideas, enthusiasm, leadership, and familiarity with material. Students and a class representative will complete evaluations and provide a total score for each peer.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

PEER EVALUATION

PEER EVALUATION
Student’s Name:
Role: Student’s Name:
Role:
Please try to be as honest and fair as possible in
your assessment. Please try to be as honest and fair as possible in
5 = Excellent work: was crucial component to your assessment.
group’s success 5 = Excellent work: was crucial component to
4 = Very strong work; contributed significantly to group’s success
group 4 = Very strong work; contributed significantly to
3 = Sufficient effort; contributed adequately to group
group 3 = Sufficient effort; contributed adequately to
2 = Insufficient effort; met minimal standards of group
group 2 = Insufficient effort; met minimal standards of
1 = Little or weak effort; was detrimental to group
group 1 = Little or weak effort; was detrimental to
group

PEER Evaluation (Name of evaluator:


____________________________) PEER Evaluation (Name of evaluator:
____________________________)
_____ Participation in developing ideas and
planning project _____ Participation in developing ideas and
_____Willingness to discuss the ideas of others planning project
_____ Interest and enthusiasm in project _____Willingness to discuss the ideas of others
_____Participation in leading/facilitating _____ Interest and enthusiasm in project
discussion _____Participation in leading/facilitating
_____Ease and familiarity with discussion discussion
material _____Ease and familiarity with discussion
material
Total:
Total:

MAYOR/Class Representative Evaluation


MAYOR/Class Representative Evaluation
_____Participation in developing ideas and
planning project _____Participation in developing ideas and
_____Willingness to discuss the ideas of others planning project
_____Interest and enthusiasm in project _____Willingness to discuss the ideas of others
_____Participation in leading/facilitating _____ Interest and enthusiasm in project
discussion _____Participation in leading/facilitating
_____Ease and familiarity with discussion discussion
material _____Ease and familiarity with discussion
material
Total:
Total:

Signature of the Mayor or Class Representative


Signature of the Mayor or Class Representative
______________
______________

You might also like