Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Modeled effective Classroom observation tool (COT) rating Quality
Education Knowledge applications of content sheet/s
Services and Pedagogy knowledge within and
across curriculum and proof of attendance of colleague/s
teaching areas.
(PPST 1.1.3)
Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic 2. Evaluated with 1. Proof/s of attendance in coaching and Quality
Education colleagues the mentoring sessions/meetings/LAC sessions/
Services effectiveness of teaching FGDs/collegial discussions that highlights the
strategies that promote objective
learner achievement in 2. Minutes/Notes of coaching and mentoring Efficiency
literacy and numeracy. sessions/meetings/LAC sessions/
FGDs/collegial discussions that highlights the Timeliness
(PPST 1.4.3) objective
3. Reflection notes of teachers on the coaching
and mentoring sessions/meetings/LAC
sessions/ FGDs/collegial discussions that
highlights the objective with proof/s of
attendance
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 3. Developed and applied Classroom observation tool (COT) rating Quality
Education effective teaching sheet/s
Services strategies to promote
critical and creative and proof of attendance of colleague/s
thinking, as well as
other higher-order
thinking skills.
(PPST 1.5.3)
Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Worked with Classroom observation tool (COT) rating Quality
Education Environment colleagues to model and sheet/s
Services and Diversity share effective techniques
of Learners in the management of and proof of attendance of colleague/s
classroom structure to
engage learners,
individually or in groups, Efficiency
in meaningful exploration,
discovery and hands-on
activities within a range of
physical learning
environments.
(PPST 2.2.3)
Timeliness
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 5. Exhibited effective and Classroom observation tool (COT) rating Quality
Education constructive behavior sheet/s
Services management skills by
applying positive and and proof of attendance of colleague/s
non-violent discipline to
ensure learning-
focused environments.
(PPST 2.6.3) Efficiency
Timeliness
Basic 6. Worked with Classroom observation tool (COT) rating Quality
Education colleagues to share sheet/s
Services differentiated,
developmentally and proof of attendance of colleague/s
appropriate
opportunities to
address learners’
differences in gender,
needs, strengths, Efficiency
interests and
experiences.
(PPST 3.1.3)
Timeliness
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Developed and applied Classroom observation tool (COT) rating Quality
Education and Planning effective strategies in the sheet/s
Services planning and
management of and proof of attendance of colleague/s
developmentally
sequenced teaching and
learning processes to
meet curriculum Efficiency
requirements and varied
teaching contexts.
(PPST 4.1.3)
Timeliness
8. Reviewed with 1. Performance Monitoring and Coaching Form Quality
colleagues, teacher 2. Minutes of LAC, FGD Session, or other
and learner feedback to collegial discussions, with proof of attendance
plan, facilitate and 3. Approved LAC Plan
enrich teaching
Efficiency
practice.
(PPST 4.4.3) Timeliness
Basic 12. Applied skills in the Any one (1) of the following documents Quality
Education effective highlighting the objective:
Services communication of • Sample of learners’ test reults signed by
learner needs, parents and corresponding evidence of
progress and improvement
achievement to key • Attendance sheet/minutes of parent-teacher
stakeholders, conference
including • Record of dialogue and/or parent-teacher or
teacher conferences and corresponding
parents/guardians.
evidence of improvement
(PPST 5.4.3)
• Anecdotal record communicated to and signed
by the learners and/or parents with
corresponding evidence of improvement
• Sample of accomplished rubrics given for
performance task and corresponding evidence
of improvement
• Sample agreement for learners at risk signed Efficiency
by parents and corresponding evidence of
improvement Timeliness
• Signed report cards of students at risk with
corresponding evidence of improvement
• Accomplished visitation forms signed by the
learners and/or parents
• Proof of communication with wider school-
community stakeholders
• Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
(PPST 7.5.3)
Timeliness
Mid-year Review/Rating
Weight per Mid-year Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Rater (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
KRA Results
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 5. Plus Factor 15. Performed various Any one (1) proof that the master teacher: Quality
Education related works/activities
Services that contribute to the • Served as facilitator / speaker
teaching-learning • Served as demonstration teacher
process. • Served as a member of the technical working
group
• Served as OIC in the absence of the
principal
• Represented the principal in meetings and
conferences
• Observed classes of Teachers I-III
• Assisted the school selection committee in Efficiency
the evaluation of credentials when hiring or
promoting teachers
• Served in a committee
• Served as adviser to co-curricular activities
• Served as coordinator/ chairperson
• Authored/ contributed to a book or journal
• Coached and mentored learners in
competitions
• Mentored pre-service/in-service teachers
• Conducted research within the rating period; Timeliness
• others (please specify)