Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Harold D. Lasswell
The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 37, No.4. (Jan., 1932), pp. 523-538.
Stable URL:
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-9602%28193201%2937%3A4%3C523%3ATTPACO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-T
The American Journal of Sociology is currently published by The University of Chicago Press.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR' s Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you
have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and
you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
http://www.jstor.org/journals/ucpress.html.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or
printed page of such transmission.
JSTOR is an independent not-for-profit organization dedicated to creating and preserving a digital archive of
scholarly journals. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
http://www.jstor.org/
Sat Nov 11 18:07:542006
THE AMERICAN
JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY
VOLUME XXXVII JANUARY 1932 NUMBER 4
ABSTRACT
Psychoanalysis makes three divisions of the personality: the id-including biological
needs; the superego-the socially acquired inhibitions; and the ego-the testing of
reality. The id may be said to correspond with impulse, the superego with conscience,
and the ego with reason. These three divisions function in special ways in person-to-
person relationships, in the r6le and meaning of institutions, and in person-to-occasion
relationships. Selection of personnel as well as responses to "superiors," "leaders,"
"models," can best be understood on the basis of a tripartite personality, which usually
shows the predominance of one aspect. Institutions take their meanings from their
respective appeals: economic, political, scientific, and technological to expediency; re-
ligion and fundamental law to conscience; art and sociability to natural impulse. Per-
son-to-occasion relationships also follow this general pattern. Elections are appeals to
rational considerations; patriotic holidays to conscience; carnivals and various celebra-
tions to natural impulse. The tripartite principle may also be extended to analysis of
policies and practices, doctrines, and myths and legends. It is particularly promising
when applied to the problem of social dynamics.
I
Psychoanalysis divides the personality into three main divisions,
which include biological needs, socially acquired inhibitions, and the
testing of reality. The newborn infant is a biological organism char-
acterized by its nutritive, excretory, and allied necessities, and by
its capacity to be impelled by sexual impulses when certain glands
shall have matured. Very few of the primitive biological needs of
the individual can be directly gratified, owing mainly to the restric-
tions which are imposed by representatives of the particular social
52 3
524 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY
order into which the individual is born. When these restrictions are
no longer dealt with as obstacles in the outer world, but are ob-
served on the basis of acquired modifications of behavior, the in-
dividual has achieved a new and important personality structure,
which is technically known as the "superego." The perceiving of
external relationships, and the modification of impulses in the light
of current reality, are the special functions of the third division of
the personality, the "ego." In the technical language of psycho-
analysis, the original biological needs are the "id," the inhibitions
are the superego, and the reality adaptations occur in the ego.
About the proper connotation is conveyed by speaking of personali-
ty as divisible into the realms of impulse, conscience, and reason,
although some distortion is involved in this usage, inasmuch as the
conscience and the reason are not categorically differl(nt from the
impelling drives of the individual, but rather complications which
arise in the process of elaborating these drives in relation to one
another and to surroundings.
Since social and political processes take place among people,
there can be no major contribution to the understanding of per-
sonality which fails to carry with it certain immediate implications
for the analysis of collective processes. Within the last thirty or
forty years psychology has received a new and powerful impetus
from the study of those major deformations of personality growth
which we speak of as mental diseases. Where this study has been
conducted with full attention to the interconnection between proc-
esses capable of description in physiological terms, and processes
capable of description in psychological or sociological terms, signi-
ficant progress has been made. Investigations that began in the
clinic with some single distortion of personality refine and generalize
their methods and their theories until a comprehensive account of
personality development in both its healthy and its pathological
aspects is the result. In all this Freud is the epochal figure, and it is
to psychoanalysis with its insight into the tripartite structure of
personality that we may recur in search of a promising starting-
point for the reconsideration of politics and society.
If the personality system is divisible into the reaction patterns
assignable to impulse, conscience, and reason, it follows that the
THE TRIPLE-APPEAL PRINCIPLE
culties to his retention than did Miss X. After all, the secretary was
principally a nuisance. But the young man who served as field repre-
sentative was often a serious problem. Everyone agreed that he
possessed exceptionally captivating ways, and that he bound pro-
spective clients to mm by his open-handed, generosity, his never
failing good humor, and his great personal charm. But these very
assets were frequently expended upon dangerous quests which seri-
ously damaged his own reputation and that of his superiors. He was
continually becoming involved in clandestine love affairs with the
wives of his associates-affairs which were not always handled with
that discretion which, in the absence of true abstinence, is the better
part of safety. The tenacity with which Z stood behind the young
man was a matter of continual amazement as well as embarrassment
to the influential members of his organization. His attitude ap-
peared all the more remarkable because the private life of Z was well
known to be exemplary, and in spite of a certain gusty looseness of
language, he had been known to deal severely with men who allowed
sex to interfere with professional obligations. As for Z, himself, he
was never quite at ease in discussing the matter, usually asserting
tartly that he believed the young man had very good stuff in him,
and that it would be a mistake to act too harshly without giving him
a chance to settle down. Every responsible person agreed that the
young man was promising enough, but opinion was practically
unanimous that he had so repeatedly and so shamelessly imposed
upon the tolerance of his superiors that he had forfeited all claims to
special consideration in the future.
In the confidence of the analytical situation, Z said that he was
himself at a loss to understand his own position, since he had much
respect for the judgment of those who criticized the excesses of the
field representative. It was only gradually that the private back-
ground of'Z became sufficiently illuminated in reminiscence to dis-
close the unconscious motivation which accounted for his quite
exceptional loyalty to this young man. Z had gone through many
years in youth during which he had been harried by keen feelings of
his own incapacity, especially in the specific field of sex. An accident
in early childhood had damaged him physically, and his morbid
reveries about himself were not wholly without foundation. A boy-
528 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY
hood companion of Z had played the r6le with girls which Z had
secretly envied. This companion had been carried off early by an
infection, and Z had always felt a sorrowful and protective attach-
ment to his memory. Quite without being conscious of it, Z had read
into his young field representative his own admiration and attach-
ment for his boyhood friend, the emotional power of which is indi-
cated by his long-suffering forbearance. In part, Z secured an in-
direct gratification of his own deeply buried impulse life by virtue
of this identification.
It would be a mistake to imagine that the history just referred to
is, in principle, exceptional. The details of the picture vary as in-
dividual backgrounds vary, but the main point is clear enough. We
select our personal circles according to the appeal made to the prin-
cipal components, both conscious and unconscious, of our personali-
ties. It may be that within our official r6le as superintendent, direc-
tor, department head, bureau chief, manager, foreman, editor, or
publisher we are principally governed by rational calculations of
efficiency in our choices of personnel, and that our intimates are
chosen from among those who appeal to the life of impulse and con-
science. But the study of actual administrators has shown that this
subordination of discretion to considerations of mere utility is never
fully achieved. Private motives of the kind mentioned not only con-
tinue to operate, but not infrequently predominate, in the choice of
personnel.
Since this highly schematic presentation has referred to marginal
instances, it may be well to stop for a moment to emphasize the
fact that every relationship between persons involves appeals to
every phase of the personality, and that thorough analysis of any
particular case is extremely intricate. Every enduring personal rela-
tion implies a fusion of meanings derived from each of the principal
personality levels, although anyone level frequently does pre-
dominate.
Since the selection of personnel is subject to influences which
modify simple considerations of efficiency, the history of institutions
may be examined from the point of view of assessing the relative
importance of these modifying factors. Do we find that though a
given enterprise required great ruthlessness to succeed, the moral
THE TRIPLE-APPEAL PRINCIPLE
II
The tripartite analysis, which has been applied to p(!rson-to-
person relationships, can be applied with no less cogency to the
study of the meaning of those patterns of social life which are so
firmly rooted that they deserve to be named "institutions." Insti-
tutions, conceived as social objects, likewise appeal to human per-
sonalities as the price of their perpetuation, and their appeal may be
highly specialized to impulse, conscience, or reason. Spranger has
classified the institutionalized achievements of man into economic,
political, religious, social, aesthetic, and scientific. Each one is styl-
ized in innumerable ways from culture to culture, and from epoch to
epoch. To Spranger's sixfold classification we may add a seventh,
which we shall call the "technological," the justification for which
has been extensively dealt with by Fritz Giese.
It is the economic, political, scientific, and technological which
appeals to the reason of man, demanding continuous modification
of ends in terms of the limits imposed by reality. Politics, taken to
mean the art of management, is peculiarly the sphere of expedient
calculation. Demands which at first sight appear irreconcilable short
of violence m~y be harmonized in relation to goal symbols and spe-
cial practices. When the arbitrament of violence is involved, the
same swift calculation of disposable means to sharply defined ends
is implied. The province of economics is that of the articulation of
men and materials for the production of rather tangible objects and
services; science disciplines the imaginative :Bights of man by req-
uisitioning attention to the nature of unfolding reality. Technology
is concerned with the elaboration of means, with scant reference to
general principles of economy in relation to the market.
The inhibitory structure of the personality is appealed to mainly
by religious institutions, which sanction the relinquishment of direct
impulsive gratifications by the young at the behest of their elders.
These denials are powerfully buttressed by appeals of a symbolic
order to the primitive cravings for universal protection and' for
cosmic participation. In so far as law involves the enforcement of
standards concerning which there is practically no dissent within the
community, law is to be classed with the religious institutions.
Those "laws" which enunciate an imperative which depends upon
THE TRIPLE-APPEAL PRINCIPLE 533
bare majorities or pluralities are not in the same category but fall
within the world of the debatable and the shifting balance of power
(politics).
The world of aesthetics makes a strong appeal to the primary
springs of the personality, permitting direct pleasure in the smudg-
ing of liquids and the molding of solids, in undisciplined reverie, and
in the discovery of forms which indirectly gratify the asocial or the
antisocial cravings of the personality. The artistic imagination ad-
mits no duty of external relevance to govern the choice of propor-
tion, design, and color. Limits which are imposed by imperfect ma-
terials or undiscovered manipulative techniques are merely obstruc-
tions, and not, as in the case of science, ruling conditions. The fact
that art may be used to adorn symbols of the superego is a tribute
to the necessity of reinforcing the imperative orders of conscience
by more seductive devices.
Art~ viewed from the standpoint of the established order, always
shows much waywardness, ,that is, many concessions to the primi-
tive natqre of man. Much the same tendency to get out of hand, to
go beyond the conventions, and to neglect solemn obligations is
shown in the world of social intercourse. Institutions are forever
being dissolved in the wayward heat of affections which transcend
them. Intimacies bridge chasms between lawful and lawless, high-
born and low-born, rich and poor, white and black. The convention-
alizations which are imbedded in the superego, and which are ex-
ternally buttressed by proper conduct in formal social situations,
together with institutional ceremonialism and symbolism, give way
under the impulsive pressure of private, intimate ties. "Friendship"
has often been called the enemy of "law," for friendship motivates
exceptions to the rule on behalf of the one who is understood, ad-
mired, and loved.
Our institutional paradigm so far reads: The appeal to expediency
is predominant in economic, political, scientific, and technological
institutions; the appeal to conscience is that of religion and funda-
mental law; the appeal to natural impulse is that of art and socia-
bility. Needless to insist, politics involves appeals to hatreds, om-
nipotence, lusts, and submissive urges; economics includes appeals
to powerful acquisitive, retentive, and potentially expulsive drives;
534 THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY