The document discusses differences in post-school qualifications obtained by males and females in Australia in 1999. It shows that a higher percentage of males obtained skilled vocational qualifications and degrees/certificates compared to females. For undergraduate diplomas, males obtained around 40% while females reached 70%. There were also moderate differences between males and females for bachelor's degrees and postgraduate diplomas/master's degrees. The document also discusses the debate around restrictions on creative artists' freedom of expression and opinions on both sides of the issue. It concludes that both restricting content and having no restrictions have merits, so determining what information to allow in a community requires considering positives and negatives from both perspectives.
The document discusses differences in post-school qualifications obtained by males and females in Australia in 1999. It shows that a higher percentage of males obtained skilled vocational qualifications and degrees/certificates compared to females. For undergraduate diplomas, males obtained around 40% while females reached 70%. There were also moderate differences between males and females for bachelor's degrees and postgraduate diplomas/master's degrees. The document also discusses the debate around restrictions on creative artists' freedom of expression and opinions on both sides of the issue. It concludes that both restricting content and having no restrictions have merits, so determining what information to allow in a community requires considering positives and negatives from both perspectives.
The document discusses differences in post-school qualifications obtained by males and females in Australia in 1999. It shows that a higher percentage of males obtained skilled vocational qualifications and degrees/certificates compared to females. For undergraduate diplomas, males obtained around 40% while females reached 70%. There were also moderate differences between males and females for bachelor's degrees and postgraduate diplomas/master's degrees. The document also discusses the debate around restrictions on creative artists' freedom of expression and opinions on both sides of the issue. It concludes that both restricting content and having no restrictions have merits, so determining what information to allow in a community requires considering positives and negatives from both perspectives.
The chart below illustrates the different levels of post-school
qualifications in Australia according to gender and the different percentage of men and women who held them in 1999 in 5 types of diploma. During this year, the ratio of man who got degree or certificate was rising higher than woman. The qualification in skilled vocational was the highest percentage achieved diploma by males. This was far higher than the proportion of woman which just only get around 10 percent. In sharp contrast, The undergraduate diploma of males in this year hit the low point which just be displayed near 40 percent and It can be seen from the graph that there was a significant differences between the rate of woman and man in this area. Instead of remaining steadily under man percentage, woman had some markedly changes in this stage and reached peak at 70 percent. As is shown, The ratio in bachelor’s degree in both genders are slightly different. And the last, Postgraduate diploma and master’s degree showed moderate proportion between males and females. TASK 2
Naturally, The birds have a pair of wings to fly to get their
freedom and their praxis. It just like a creative artist who want to follow their desire and the dream to get their own space or ideas. But, One thing that makes bird can not fully as the same as the artist is the restriction. Some people said that creative artist should always be given freedom to express their frontwise in whatever tools of media that they wish and there should no government forbidden rules ( In words, pictures, music or film) on what they do. In contrasty, some local communities decline this perception. In my opinion I partly agree with 2 comments .
First, if a creator do not have any chance to express or
propagate with the community, they will become bored and think that they are useless and their career path was a wrong decision. Moreover, Putting a rhymester in a sizeable room which surround by laws or strictly rules not only will not help the internet society becomes more cleaner but it also brings detrimental desire to other people. On the other hand, if the was no restriction, the creator might have more chance to bring their product, their inspiration to more and more people. But From my point of view, the perception about creation and law should be empaled by society. For instance, back to few years ago, there was no countless rule like today about what should be appeared on the internet and influencer could publish any kind of video on Youtube. This was one of the main causes which make bad content was speared out and predominated.
In conclusion, I think both ideas have their right explicate. But
to decide which information can be brought to our community, the ban have to be taken to consideration and weighing up both sides positive and negative to fit the society ambience