Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/271573227
CITATIONS READS
62 4,437
6 authors, including:
Philip Zelazo
University of Minnesota Twin Cities
215 PUBLICATIONS 25,410 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Kristen Lyons on 29 June 2015.
ESSAY
Abstract Research with adults suggests that contemplative practices such as meditation and
yoga impart a variety of benefits, from improved attention to reduced stress. Increasingly, these
practices are being adapted for use with children and introduced into childhood education in
order to foster the development of key self-regulation skills required for academic achievement
and emotional well-being. This article reviews empirical evidence that supports the introduc-
tion of contemplative practices into childhood education. Directions for future research are
discussed.
S. L. Shapiro (*)
Santa Clara University, 500 El Camino Real, Santa Clara, CA 95003, USA
e-mail: slshapiro@scu.edu
R. C. Miller : B. Butler
Integrative Restoration Institute, San Rafael, CA, USA
C. Vieten
Institute of Noetic Sciences and California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, CA,
USA
2 Educ Psychol Rev (2015) 27:1–30
Although contemplative practices have historically been associated with spiritual or religious
traditions, the practices themselves are not inherently religious. Contemplative practices can be
introduced in a secular fashion, as is typically the case in clinical or educational contexts (e.g.,
Baer 2003; Burke 2010; Kabat-Zinn 2003). These practices at their core involve regulation of
attention. In addition, these practices often focus on cultivation of prosocial attitudes and
Educ Psychol Rev (2015) 27:1–30 3
behavior, such as compassion, empathy, and respect for others, and as such, they reflect a
system of values and have moral implications.
The word contemplate is derived from the Latin contemplationem (“the act of looking at”)
or contemplari (“to gaze attentively, to observe”). Contemplative practices involve paying
attention in a purposeful and sustained way to internal experiences (e.g., one’s thoughts,
sensations, or breath) or external perceptions (e.g., the sound of a bell, an image, or other
people). For example, common techniques involve focusing on one’s breathing as an anchor to
the present moment or attending to the thoughts and perceptions that come to mind in one’s
stream of consciousness. Regulation of attention is core to contemplative practice, but beyond
simply attention regulation, there is also an intention to infuse the attention with attitudes of
openness, acceptance, and interest (Shapiro et al. 2006).
Contemplation is often practiced in the context of formal sitting, standing, or walking
meditations. However, one may also practice contemplation by focusing on a specific object,
spending time in silence or in nature, and engaging in art or other activities. The contemplative
component of contemplative practice can therefore be understood as intentional and structured
means of investigating and relating to one’s experiences.
The practice aspect of contemplative practice entails, by definition, repeatedly engaging in
contemplation. Repetition of mental and physical activity alters neurocircuitry, strengthening
the synaptic connections that are used and reducing the strength of less frequently used
connections (Stiles 2008). As a result, mental training (including contemplative practice)
may increase the ease of engaging in the practiced behavior while decreasing the prepotency
of nonpracticed behaviors that have the potential to interfere with that behavior (Slagter et al.
2011).
From the perspective of developmental neuroscience, age-appropriate contemplative exer-
cises may be conceptualized as a neural training regime—targeting core self-regulatory skills
that are important for problem-solving success in the classroom and in daily life and helping to
create the neural networks that support those fundamental skills (Zelazo and Lyons 2012). A
key feature of many contemplative exercises is that they encourage sustained reflection on
one’s subjective experiences. Exercising the neural circuitry involved in reflection would be
expected to increase the efficiency of that circuitry and produce a corresponding increase in the
likelihood and ease with which children engage in reflection prior to acting. For these reasons,
repeated practice in observing with open acceptance moment-to-moment experiences may
reduce the tendency to respond automatically, impulsively, and reactively (e.g., with emotional
responses or impulsive thoughts or actions). Likewise, repeated practice sustaining attention
for longer and longer periods should increase the efficiency of the neural circuits involved in
sustained attention, leading to an increase in the duration of time that a child can maintain
focus before becoming distracted.
Children’s lessons in all of these programs typically include a variety of short formal
meditation exercises interspersed with activities designed to foster self-reflection (e.g., reflec-
tion on one’s breathing, sensations, emotions, or thoughts) and observation of one’s surround-
ings (e.g., awareness of others and awareness of stimuli in the environment). These lessons are
typically led by instructors who themselves have an ongoing contemplative practice.
Compared with adult exercises, contemplative practices for children are usually much briefer.
For example, sitting meditation activities may last only a few minutes for young children,
compared with 45 min or an hour for adults (Saltzman and Goldin 2008).
Props may also be used to scaffold young children’s attention. For example, to help children
focus on their breathing, preschoolers may be asked to lie on the floor with a stuffed animal on
their abdomens, and observe it rise and fall with their breathing (Kaiser-Greenland 2010).
Alternatively, children may be invited to take deep full breaths that allow their entire ribcage to
expand and contract in all directions while holding a Hoberman sphere that also expands and
contracts, and synchronizing its movements with each of their breaths (Miller et al. 2011).
Another example involves training attention through listening: children are invited to listen to
the sound of a bell fade until they can no longer hear it.
Activities may also be illustrated through the use of narratives and/or concrete metaphors.
For example, in the iRest for Kids program (Miller et al. 2011), children are first read the story
The Princess and the Pea. Next, they are invited to lie down with or without eyes closed while
a cold pea is placed in the palm of their hand. Then they are asked questions to probe their
sensory awareness (e.g., “I wonder if you can you be as sensitive as the princess? As I place
the pea in your hand what do you notice? Is it warm or cold… heavy or light?). The use of
props, narratives, and concrete metaphors may help children attend to internal sensations,
thoughts, or feelings that may otherwise be too abstract or fleeting for them to notice.
Indeed, children (and adults) often find it difficult to reflect consciously on what James
called the “stream of consciousness” (Flavell et al. 1995, 2000). However, emerging findings
suggest that children may be able to monitor more concrete or salient subjective experiences,
such as sensory perceptions (Lyons and Ghetti 2010). Many contemplative activities for
children capitalize on this, directing children’s attention towards their somatosensory percep-
tions. For example, children might practice mindful eating, purposefully and intentionally
paying attention to all aspects of the experience of eating a raisin—its color, texture, temper-
ature, and taste (Kaiser-Greenland 2010). Such activities may provide children with an avenue
into monitoring more abstract cognitive experiences, such as emotions or thoughts. For
example, after attending to the perceptual features of the food one eats, children are asked to
notice the “colors,” “texture,” or “temperature” of their emotions (Miller et al. 2011).
Traditionally, curricula for young children have been designed mainly to promote rudimentary
academic skills, such as literacy and math. Newer approaches to pedagogy have recognized the
importance of more fundamental self-regulation skills, including social and emotional skills
(e.g., Bierman et al. 2008) and executive function (Diamond and Lee 2011). Self-regulation
skills make it possible for children to adapt to new challenges and solve problems—both
within the classroom and outside of it. For example, to learn effectively in a classroom setting,
children need to be able to sit still, pay attention, follow rules, and avoid disruptive behavior
(e.g., McClelland et al. 2007). In the course of contemplative activities, children practice many
of these key self-regulation skills, repeatedly and in ways designed to encourage skill building
(e.g., by paying attention for longer and longer periods of time). Exercising these skills may be
Table 1 Contemplative practice programs in childhood education
Program Age groups A brief description of the A brief description of Who leads the Targeted outcomes (what Any published research
targeted program and the how the program is curriculum; are special are the goals of the findings or previously
(years or contemplative implemented (is it a teachers needed or is program?) reported effects
grades) background it is rooted in curriculum to be special training needed
implemented in a set for teachers to implement
order? Suggested it?
activities to be integrated
into the classroom, etc.)
Educ Psychol Rev (2015) 27:1–30
iRest for Kids® Pre-K to Integrative restoration The iRest curriculum is Schoolteachers can iRest aim to support the Preliminary research
(http://www.irest. 12th (iRest) is a 10-step designed to be receive specialized healthy growth of the indicates that iRest is
us/irestforkids) grade contemplative practice, delivered to either training in how to whole child through helpful in alleviating
which utilizes hands individuals or groups; integrate iRest the development of symptoms of PTSD,
on developmentally implemented either as components into emotional and insomnia, anxiety,
appropriate activities an “on the go” everyday classroom cognitive intelligence chronic pain,
designed to teach kids program integrated activities. Certified and an internalized depression, and
skills aligned with their into everyday iRest Teachers® are locus of control, chemical dependency
level of emotional and classroom activities, or trained to deliver the through structured in adolescents and
cognitive develop- as a discrete program iRest program as an activities that adults. iRest trained
ment. iRest assists kids that can be taught in after- or during-school encourage divergent teachers are delivering
in experiencing a sense daily, weekly, or even specialized program thinking, and iRest to active duty
of mastery when en- monthly segments emotional and military and combat
countering challenging cognitive flexibility. veterans, chronic pain
situations and an inner iRest tries to enhance a sufferers, the homeless,
sense of ease and well- child’s ability to sense the incarcerated, health
being that pervades their interior and care givers, youth,
their everyday life external world through kids, and other special
awareness of their interest groups.
physical body Research literature and
sensations thereby posters on iRest can be
promoting self- found at www.irest.us/
awareness, control, programs/irest-
mastery, esteem, regu- research-and-
lation, the capacity to programs/
respond rather than
5
6
Table 1 (continued)
Program Age groups A brief description of the A brief description of Who leads the Targeted outcomes (what Any published research
targeted program and the how the program is curriculum; are special are the goals of the findings or previously
(years or contemplative implemented (is it a teachers needed or is program?) reported effects
grades) background it is rooted in curriculum to be special training needed
implemented in a set for teachers to implement
order? Suggested it?
activities to be integrated
into the classroom, etc.)
Program Age groups A brief description of the A brief description of Who leads the Targeted outcomes (what Any published research
targeted program and the how the program is curriculum; are special are the goals of the findings or previously
(years or contemplative implemented (is it a teachers needed or is program?) reported effects
grades) background it is rooted in curriculum to be special training needed
implemented in a set for teachers to implement
order? Suggested it?
activities to be integrated
into the classroom, etc.)
Educ Psychol Rev (2015) 27:1–30
Program Age groups A brief description of the A brief description of Who leads the Targeted outcomes (what Any published research
targeted program and the how the program is curriculum; are special are the goals of the findings or previously
(years or contemplative implemented (is it a teachers needed or is program?) reported effects
grades) background it is rooted in curriculum to be special training needed
implemented in a set for teachers to implement
order? Suggested it?
activities to be integrated
into the classroom, etc.)
Program Age groups A brief description of the A brief description of Who leads the Targeted outcomes (what Any published research
targeted program and the how the program is curriculum; are special are the goals of the findings or previously
(years or contemplative implemented (is it a teachers needed or is program?) reported effects
grades) background it is rooted in curriculum to be special training needed
implemented in a set for teachers to implement
order? Suggested it?
activities to be integrated
into the classroom, etc.)
Educ Psychol Rev (2015) 27:1–30
Program Age groups A brief description of the A brief description of Who leads the Targeted outcomes (what Any published research
targeted program and the how the program is curriculum; are special are the goals of the findings or previously
(years or contemplative implemented (is it a teachers needed or is program?) reported effects
grades) background it is rooted in curriculum to be special training needed
implemented in a set for teachers to implement
order? Suggested it?
activities to be integrated
into the classroom, etc.)
Program Age groups A brief description of the A brief description of Who leads the Targeted outcomes (what Any published research
targeted program and the how the program is curriculum; are special are the goals of the findings or previously
(years or contemplative implemented (is it a teachers needed or is program?) reported effects
grades) background it is rooted in curriculum to be special training needed
implemented in a set for teachers to implement
order? Suggested it?
activities to be integrated
into the classroom, etc.)
Educ Psychol Rev (2015) 27:1–30
colleagues. The school sessions and with what is, and esteem and sleep quality.
MBSR-T program is varying time periods. kindness toward self Of clinical significance,
meant to be a program Specific practices and others. Teens often the MBSR group
to use with adolescents include body scan, benefit from activities showed a higher per-
(vs. the traditional walking meditation, that focus on noticing centage of diagnostic
MBSR program, de- sitting meditation, and awareness of self- improvement over the 5-
signed for use with sitting meditation with other judgments, month study period and
adults); formal prac- heartfulness, yoga, worries, things out of significant increases in
tices are shorter in du- mindful stopping, one’s control, and pain global assessment of
ration to accommodate mindful homework/test and suffering. Many functioning scores rela-
the attention span of taking. Additional em- mental health difficul- tive to controls, as rated
adolescents and lan- phasis on mindful ties arise from these by condition-naive clini-
guage, references and qualities of living, in- aforementioned cians (Biegel et al.
stories that are relevant formal practice and thoughts 2009). MBSR-T treated
to them are used. developing an aware- adolescents have shown
Stressed Teens teaches ness of one’s thoughts increases in Mindful At-
mindfulness skills and tention Awareness
provides tools for those Scale—Adolescent
in their pre-teen years (MAAS–A) scores and
through latter adoles- were significantly relat-
cence. Stressed Teens ed to beneficial changes
takes a mind–body ap- in numerous mental
proach and focuses on health indicators. Other
the whole person. As active research projects
teens often have diffi- include collaboration
culty with their social with: Georgetown
11
12
Table 1 (continued)
Program Age groups A brief description of the A brief description of Who leads the Targeted outcomes (what Any published research
targeted program and the how the program is curriculum; are special are the goals of the findings or previously
(years or contemplative implemented (is it a teachers needed or is program?) reported effects
grades) background it is rooted in curriculum to be special training needed
implemented in a set for teachers to implement
order? Suggested it?
activities to be integrated
into the classroom, etc.)
Program Age groups A brief description of the A brief description of Who leads the Targeted outcomes (what Any published research
targeted program and the how the program is curriculum; are special are the goals of the findings or previously
(years or contemplative implemented (is it a teachers needed or is program?) reported effects
grades) background it is rooted in curriculum to be special training needed
implemented in a set for teachers to implement
order? Suggested it?
activities to be integrated
into the classroom, etc.)
Educ Psychol Rev (2015) 27:1–30
mindfulness and readiness of the program to help them resiliency, impulse on an urban, low
mindfulness-based students. Lessons implement the control, stress reduc- income, middle-school
stress reduction. The focus on emotions, practices in the tion, and mindfulness student population
program takes a whole intentions, personal classroom skills indicated a significant
person focus to help goals, resiliency, and effect for the treat-
students manage the problem-solving skills. ment group in the
challenges of school, Lessons can be used ability to shift, 1 of 8
family, work, and with typical and atypi- domains scored in a
community in a cal populations (e.g., test of cognitive and
healthy and balanced children with autism or behavioral regulation.
way in special education Treatment scores
programs). The activi- showed a positive
ties in the lessons in- trend in improvement
clude discussion of se- of the overall scores
lected mind–body on the Metacognition
health and wellness Index and Global
topics, practicing Executive Composite
mindfulness skills, of the Behavior Rat-
breathing exercises, ing Inventory of Ex-
and mindful move- ecutive Function
ments (BRIEF). Both stud-
ies are internal pro-
jects not yet peer-
reviewed
13
14
Table 1 (continued)
Program Age groups A brief description of the A brief description of Who leads the Targeted outcomes (what Any published research
targeted program and the how the program is curriculum; are special are the goals of the findings or previously
(years or contemplative implemented (is it a teachers needed or is program?) reported effects
grades) background it is rooted in curriculum to be special training needed
implemented in a set for teachers to implement
order? Suggested it?
activities to be integrated
into the classroom, etc.)
Yoga 4 Classrooms® Elementary Yoga 4 Classrooms® is a Teachers and students are Y4C is taught by trained The goal of Y4C is to Yoga 4 Classrooms has
(Y4C) (http://www. school tool designed to led in 30 min, in- instructors. Y4C create peaceful, partnered with a
yoga4classrooms.com) facilitate students’ classroom Y4C® ses- requires that instructors learning-ready, pro- University of
physical, mental, sions, once per week be trained via training ductive classroom en- Massachusetts-Lowell
emotional, social, and for 10 weeks. Y4C® intensives (2–3 days). vironment. The pro- Department of Exer-
personal growth. features 67 yoga and Eligibility for the gram works to improve cise Physiology re-
Grounded in evidence- mindfulness-based ac- training typically students’ focus and search team to conduct
based classroom peda- tivities, divided into 6 requires 200 h. adult readiness to learn, a research study to de-
gogies, developmental categories: Let’s yoga certification while positively termine the effects of a
science, cross-sectional Breathe, At Your Desk, transforming the classroom yoga and
research in cognitive Stand Strong, Loosen school culture. Y4C is mindfulness program
affective neuroscience, Up, Imagination Vaca- designed to help stu- on academic perfor-
tenets of positive psy- tion, and Be Well. Ac- dents ease anxiety, im- mance, mood and be-
chology and secular tivities include illus- prove listening skills, havior, attention/focus,
contemplative prac- trated instructions, dis- improve posture, and stress, and immune
tices, Y4C’s mission is cussion points, confidence function. After Y4C
to transform educa- subactivities, and edu- completion, reported
tional environments cational tie-ins. Y4C® improvements includ-
through yoga-based includes yoga postures, ed attention span, abil-
wellness training and movements, breath ex- ity to stay on task,
support ercises, visualizations, focus/ability to con-
mindfulness activities, centrate, respect for
creative movement, self/others, ability to
and community- adjust attitude, ability
building games to deal with stress/
anxiety, and emotional
Educ Psychol Rev (2015) 27:1–30
Table 1 (continued)
Program Age groups A brief description of the A brief description of Who leads the Targeted outcomes (what Any published research
targeted program and the how the program is curriculum; are special are the goals of the findings or previously
(years or contemplative implemented (is it a teachers needed or is program?) reported effects
grades) background it is rooted in curriculum to be special training needed
implemented in a set for teachers to implement
order? Suggested it?
activities to be integrated
into the classroom, etc.)
Educ Psychol Rev (2015) 27:1–30
well-being (Coulumbe
et al. 2011)
Inner Resilience Program K–8th grade The Inner Resilience IRP emphasizes The Building Resilience Students develop social, IRP has served over 5,000
(IRP) (http://www. and Program’s mission is to mindfulness training in from the Inside Out emotional and inner school staff, 2,000
innerresilience- teachers cultivate the inner lives educators and course involves a 10-h life skills such as parents and over
tidescenter.org) and staff of students, teachers, administrative staff to training and follow-up calming themselves 10,000 students since
at all and schools by create an optimal staff development when upset, relaxing 2002. In a randomized
levels integrating social and environment for the visits to each individu- their bodies and minds, trial, teachers in the
emotional learning school as a whole. al classroom of the and enhancing their treatment group
(SEL) with contempla- Building Resilience teachers trained. IRP attention skills. experienced reduced
tive practice. The from the Inside Out is also includes weekend Intended outcomes are stress levels, increased
Building Resilience based on the book residential retreats for include increased self- levels of attention and
from the Inside Out Building Emotional school staff, profes- awareness, relaxation, mindfulness, and
curriculum uses mind- Intelligence: sional development improved concentra- greater perceived
fulness as its core Techniques to workshops, individual tion stress coping, and relational trust with
teaching. Self- Cultivate Inner stress reduction ses- improved communica- their colleagues. Third-
regulation, care for Strength in Children sions, and parent tion between adults grade students of treat-
others, and attention (Lantieri 2008). Tech- workshops at school and children, and im- ment teachers per-
skills are taught with niques including pro- sites proved classroom ceived that they had
the aim of creating an gressive muscle relax- management and more autonomy and
optimal classroom en- ation and mindfulness classroom climate influence in their clas-
vironment practices and exercises. ses at the end of the
The curriculum in- school year, as well as
cludes a CD of guided lower frustration levels
practices for use in the (Metis Associates
classroom 2011)
15
16
Table 1 (continued)
Program Age groups A brief description of the A brief description of Who leads the Targeted outcomes (what Any published research
targeted program and the how the program is curriculum; are special are the goals of the findings or previously
(years or contemplative implemented (is it a teachers needed or is program?) reported effects
grades) background it is rooted in curriculum to be special training needed
implemented in a set for teachers to implement
order? Suggested it?
activities to be integrated
into the classroom, etc.)
Mindfulness in Schools Ages14– The Mindfulness in The in-classroom pro- MiSP offers training to The core aims of the In a study of adolescent
Project (MiSP) (http:// 18 years Schools Project gram of the MiSP cur- people who have program are: to raise boys, intervention and
mindfulnessinschools. (MiSP) is a nonprofit riculum is a 9-week completed at least 1 awareness of control groups (N=
org/) organization whose course that teaches MBCT or MBSR mindfulness, to 155) were compared
aim is to encourage, MBSR/MBCT program, and have an experience greater on measures of
support, and research methods in a manner established well-being, e.g., feel mindfulness, resilience
the teaching of secular appropriate for adoles- mindfulness practice. happier, calmer, and and psychological
mindfulness in cents. The program The teacher training more fulfilled, to prac- well-being. While dif-
schools. It works in teaches breathing includes teaching tice a toolkit for man- ferences between
collaboration with the mindfulness, mindful materials and ongoing aging stress and anxi- groups were not sig-
Oxford Mindfulness eating, mindful move- support ety, to work with diffi- nificant, within the
Centre and the Well- ment, body scan, cult mental states such mindfulness group
being Institute of mindfulness of thought as ruminative or anx- there was a significant
Cambridge University and sound, minutes of ious thought and low positive association
silence, and mindful moods, and to support between the amount of
texting better concentration individual practice
and focus outside the classroom
and improvement in
psychological well-
being and mindfulness.
Improvements in well-
being were related to
personality variables
(agreeableness and
emotional stability).
The majority of
Educ Psychol Rev (2015) 27:1–30
Table 1 (continued)
Program Age groups A brief description of the A brief description of Who leads the Targeted outcomes (what Any published research
targeted program and the how the program is curriculum; are special are the goals of the findings or previously
(years or contemplative implemented (is it a teachers needed or is program?) reported effects
grades) background it is rooted in curriculum to be special training needed
implemented in a set for teachers to implement
order? Suggested it?
activities to be integrated
into the classroom, etc.)
Educ Psychol Rev (2015) 27:1–30
Program Age groups A brief description of the A brief description of Who leads the Targeted outcomes (what Any published research
targeted program and the how the program is curriculum; are special are the goals of the findings or previously
(years or contemplative implemented (is it a teachers needed or is program?) reported effects
grades) background it is rooted in curriculum to be special training needed
implemented in a set for teachers to implement
order? Suggested it?
activities to be integrated
into the classroom, etc.)
Program Age groups A brief description of the A brief description of Who leads the Targeted outcomes (what Any published research
targeted program and the how the program is curriculum; are special are the goals of the findings or previously
(years or contemplative implemented (is it a teachers needed or is program?) reported effects
grades) background it is rooted in curriculum to be special training needed
implemented in a set for teachers to implement
order? Suggested it?
activities to be integrated
into the classroom, etc.)
Educ Psychol Rev (2015) 27:1–30
Program Age groups A brief description of the A brief description of Who leads the Targeted outcomes (what Any published research
targeted program and the how the program is curriculum; are special are the goals of the findings or previously
(years or contemplative implemented (is it a teachers needed or is program?) reported effects
grades) background it is rooted in curriculum to be special training needed
implemented in a set for teachers to implement
order? Suggested it?
activities to be integrated
into the classroom, etc.)
expected to promote the development of executive function, emotion regulation, and perspec-
tive taking. These, in turn, might be expected to improve functioning in a wide variety of
contexts, including the classroom.
Executive Function
Executive function refers to those influences on self-regulation that are top–down, effortful,
and consciously controlled. Zelazo and colleagues (e.g., Zelazo 2004; Zelazo et al. 2003) have
argued that the development of reflection—the iterative reprocessing of information prior to
responding—is a fundamental function of prefrontal cortex that underlies the development of
particular executive function skills, such as cognitive flexibility, inhibitory control, and
working memory. Age-appropriate contemplative practices may be particularly useful in
scaffolding the development of executive function because these activities often require
children to turn their attention inward, and engage in sustained, self-reflection on their own
subjective experiences, exercising prefrontal cortical networks and driving their development.
For example, during a mindful smelling game, children may be asked to smell different scents,
notice how each scent smells, and reflect on any memories that each scent evokes (Miller et al.
2011). Practicing reflecting on one’s sensations and one’s thoughts in the contexts of such
games may enhance children’s ability to reflect more deeply on their thoughts in more
cognitively or emotionally demanding contexts, better positioning them to engage a range of
executive function skills.
A growing body of research with adults and older children indicates that executive function
may be improved through contemplative training. Long-term meditation experience is corre-
lated with enhanced attentional control (e.g., Jha et al. 2007; Slagter et al. 2009), and short-
term mindfulness-meditation training has been found to improve performance on a variety of
executive function measures in adults (Chambers et al. 2008; Heeren et al. 2009; Tang et al.
2007; Zeidan et al. 2010; Zylowska et al. 2008).
Research specifically related to children indicates that mindfulness meditation, a form of
contemplative practice which emphasizes intentionally attending to one’s moment-to-moment
experiences, improves executive function in school-age populations. In child and adolescent
psychiatric outpatients, for example, weekly group mindfulness-training sessions have been
found to reduce attention problems (Boegels et al. 2008; Semple et al. 2010; Van der Oord
et al. 2012). In community samples, bimonthly mindfulness-training activities (implemented
over the course of the school year) have been found to improve second and third graders’
ability to sustain their attention (Napoli et al. 2005). Such activities may be especially
beneficial for children with limited executive control skills (Flook et al. 2010).
Consistent with these findings, Johnson et al. (2012) found that a brief mindfulness-training
curriculum (administered in small groups in bi-weekly sessions over the course of 5 weeks)
improved preschool children’s performance on a Flanker task (Rueda et al. 2005), a widely
used measure of selective attention and inhibitory control.
Emotion Regulation
Emotion regulation involves managing the emotions that arise automatically in the context of
important events (Gross 2002; Rubin et al. 1995), including processes that monitor and control
which emotions are experienced when, and how they are expressed (Cole et al. 2004). Emotion
regulation skills are associated with important aspects of social development in young
children, including social competence during peer interactions, and empathy (Eisenberg
et al. 2002; Ramani et al. 2010). In addition, emotion regulation is needed to maintain attention
22 Educ Psychol Rev (2015) 27:1–30
and motivation in the face of emotional ups and downs (e.g., excitement over an upcoming
event or anger at a classmate over a dispute during recess). Problems with emotion regulation
are associated with poor mental health, as indexed by clinical levels of problem behaviors
(Bierman and Welsh 1997; see also Blair et al. 2004). Emotion regulation has also been linked
to academic achievement (Raver 2004).
A growing body of research with adults, adolescents, and children indicates that emotion
regulation improves as a result of contemplative practice (Davidson 2010; Ortner et al. 2007). For
example, in a randomized design, 7 weeks of mindfulness training attenuated the interfering effect
of negative stimuli on a simple cognitive task (with corresponding reductions in skin conductance
responses to those stimuli), as compared with an active control group trained in relaxation
meditation (Ortner et al. 2007). In adults with social anxiety disorder, an 8-week course on
mindfulness-based stress reduction training (MBSR) was found to produce reductions in self-
reported social anxiety, depression, and rumination. These changes are accompanied by changes in
neural activation that are indicative of more efficient emotion regulation (Goldin and Gross 2010).
Research with children indicates that mindfulness training reduces anxiety in a range of
populations, including adolescent outpatients with psychiatric disorders (Biegel et al. 2009),
inner city children (Semple et al. 2010), and typically developing first, second, and third
graders (Napoli et al. 2005). Mindfulness practice also appears to reduce depressive symptoms
in children and adolescents (Biegel et al. 2009; Liehr and Diaz 2010; Mendelson et al. 2010),
including rumination and intrusive thoughts (Mendelson et al. 2010).
Contemplative exercises in the classroom may help support the development of emotion
regulation by shaping the neural circuitry underlying both automatic and controlled aspects of
emotion regulation. With regard to the former, contemplative practices emphasize nonreactive
awareness of one’s moment-to-moment experiences—experiencing the world in a nonjudgmental
way. As a result, contemplative practices may promote a more balanced approach to one’s daily
life, so that events are less likely to capture one’s attention and elicit an emotional reaction
automatically. In addition, by promoting the capacity to reflect on one’s current thoughts and
emotions, contemplative practice may also afford children a better ability to use their top–down
control skills to consider the multiple options for responding in a given situation, allowing
children to respond flexibly and adaptively in the face of emotional events. Moreover, increasing
children’s capacity to reflect on their emotional experiences through contemplative practices may
repeatedly engage networks involving prefrontal cortex when an emotion-eliciting event occurs,
strengthening the connections between prefrontal cortex and limbic systems and thereby fortify-
ing the neural circuitry that will support emotion regulation throughout the child’s life.
Several contemplative exercises are aimed at helping children manage their emotions in a
positive way by promoting acceptance and understanding of the nuances of emotions. For
example, in the iRest for Kids program, preschool teachers present children with swatches of
fabric or stones that vary in texture and ask them to select the swatch that best matches how
they feel when they experience a particular emotion (e.g., anger). Next, the teacher asks
children to take turns saying where in their body they feel the emotion (e.g., children may say
that when they feel angry they feel it in their throats). By repeating this exercise with a variety
of emotions (e.g., sad, scared, happy, and angry), children become more acute observers of
their emotions, helping them to notice when particular emotions are being experienced, and to
respond volitionally, rather than reactively.
Perspective Taking
A third target of early contemplative training is perspective taking. We use the term perspective
taking in a broad sense, to refer to variety of metacognitive skills, including self-awareness of
Educ Psychol Rev (2015) 27:1–30 23
one’s own cognitive processes as such, the attribution of mental states to others (i.e., theory of
mind; Wellman and Liu 2004), social perspective taking (i.e., discerning the thoughts and
feelings of others), and flexible shifting between one’s own and others’ perspectives.
Perspective taking in this broad sense is clearly essential for empathy, compassion, and healthy
interpersonal skills.
First, contemplative practices require children to reflect on their own perspectives, as such.
That is, children are provided with practice reflecting on and attending to their own subjective
experiences, as when children are asked to describe their emotional reactions. As children
become increasingly able to reflect on nuances of their ongoing emotions, they may be
challenged to reflect further on their emotions (e.g., “What is the opposite of the emotion
you are currently experiencing? Where do you feel that in your body? What would the texture
of the opposite emotion be?”). They are also asked to switch back and forth between imagining
the original emotion and its opposite, practicing flexible perspective taking (Miller et al. 2011).
Such activities are designed to help children to be more aware of their own subjective
experiences, as such, but they may also have the added benefit of helping children become
aware of what other children may feel in similar situations, which may help cultivate empathy.
Children also learn that other children may not feel the same way they do when they are
experiencing an emotion.
Other contemplative practices focus more directly on social perspective taking. In
the MindUp program, for example, children retell common fairy tale stories from the
perspective of the antagonist (e.g., the wolf in Little Red Riding Hood), thinking
about the feelings that might motivate a character with whom one does not usually
sympathize. By encouraging children to reflect on their own emotions and share them,
and by explicitly addressing alternative perspectives, these practices may be expected
to promote empathy towards self and others, leading to more effective interpersonal
interactions.
Contemplative practices have been found to enhance metacognition in adults (Teasdale
et al. 2002), and practices specifically aimed at encouraging a more decentered perspective on
one’s thoughts and emotions, termed “reperceiving,” have been found to produce a variety of
positive outcomes (Orzech et al. 2009; Teasdale et al. 2002). In a randomized controlled study
with adults (premedical and medical students), for example, Shapiro et al. (1998) found that
compared with a wait-list control group, the meditation group showed increased levels of self-
reported empathy and decreased levels of anxiety and depression. These results held during the
students’ stressful exam period, and the findings were replicated when participants in the wait-
list control group received the meditation intervention. Improvements in empathic concern
have also been observed in counseling students who participated in an 8-week MBSR course,
following a pre-post-test design, compared with a matched control group (Shapiro et al. 2006).
Research on the effects of contemplative practices on perspective taking in children is
limited, however preliminary evidence is encouraging. Johnson et al. (2012), for example,
found that a brief (5-week) course on mindfulness improved preschool children’s theory of
mind understanding (as assessed using Wellman and Liu’s 2004 battery; see also Bierman et al.
2008).
There are several other domains that are potential targets of contemplative exercises in the
classroom. Although it is too soon to draw conclusions concerning the potential benefits of
contemplative exercises in these domains, there are theoretical reasons to expect benefits and
there is some empirical evidence suggesting that these areas warrant further investigation.
24 Educ Psychol Rev (2015) 27:1–30
Self-Compassion
In addition to training concern for others, contemplative activities in the classroom may
enhance positive regard for oneself. Self-compassion entails being kind toward oneself in
instances of pain or failure rather than being harshly self-critical. It also involves keeping one’s
negative experiences in perspective, and recognizing them as part of a larger set of experiences
that also include positive experiences (Neff 2003). Self-compassion has been found to predict
other positive psychological variables including wisdom, personal initiative, curiosity and
exploration, happiness, optimism, positive affect, and psychological health (Neff 2003).
By promoting children’s ability and propensity to notice their experiences without judging
them, and to observe their ongoing thoughts and emotions without reacting to them, early
contemplative exercises may facilitate the development of self-compassion. Kind feelings
towards oneself and others are also a specific target of certain contemplative exercises for
children. For example, in the friendly wishes activity developed by Kaiser-Greenland, children
practice sending kind thoughts towards a stuffed toy, people they care about, and themselves.
Several studies with adults have found that meditation-based interventions significantly
increase self-compassion in health care professionals (Shapiro et al. 2005) and counseling
psychology students (Shapiro et al. 2006), offering promising evidence that early contempla-
tive activities may promote kindness towards oneself as well as others.
Moral Development
Fostering moral maturity is of great psychological, social, and global significance. Meditative
traditions emphasize the importance of moral development, and regard moral maturity as
integral to contemplative practice. Contemplative practices show promise for enhancing ethical
motivation and behavior via several mechanisms. According to Walsh and Shapiro (2006)
these include sensitizing awareness to the costs of unethical acts (such as guilt in oneself and
pain produced in others), reducing problematic motives and emotions (such as greed and
anger), strengthening morality supporting emotions (such as love and compassion), cultivating
altruism, and enhanced identification with others (p. 237).
Preliminary research supports the suggestion that contemplative practice leads to moral
development. For example, among practitioners of Transcendental Meditation (TM), scores
on scales of moral development correlate with duration of practice, with higher scores
correlating with greater practice (Nidich et al. 1983). In college students, mindfulness-based
practice has been found to lead to improvements in ethical decision-making (Shapiro et al.
2012). Taken together, this preliminary research lends support to the potential of teaching
contemplative practices to children as a way to foster moral development and ethical
decision-making.
Finally, by promoting inquisitiveness and fostering children’s curiosity about their experiences,
contemplative exercises may also amplify children’s tendency to use their top–down attention
and self-control skills in the service of exploring their environments in new and creative ways
(both inside and outside of the classroom). For example, contemplative exercises that prompt
children to describe their emotions in terms of color or texture, or to express their thoughts
Educ Psychol Rev (2015) 27:1–30 25
through art, may promote ways of thinking about the world that complement more rational and
analytical ways of knowing (Hart 2004). In addition, research indicates that when information
is processed in a deeper, more reflective fashion, it is more likely to be integrated into one’s
knowledge base and retained (Kapur et al. 1994). By practicing being fully engaged in the
present moment (as opposed to distracted by intrusive thoughts) and by promoting inquisi-
tiveness about one’s moment-to-moment experiences, contemplative exercises may help
children to learn in a more active, reflective fashion, and this type of learning is likely to be
more effective than more passive, rote learning (Marcovitch et al. 2008).
Preliminary research with adolescents and young adults suggests that meditation can
cultivate creativity, lending support to the notion that contemplative activities may cultivate
creativity in children. Cowger and Torrance (1982), for example, studied 24 college under-
graduates who were taught Zen meditation and ten who were taught relaxation. The meditators
attained statistically significant gains in creativity as defined by self-reported heightened
consciousness of problems, perceived change, invention, sensory experience, expression of
emotion/feeling, humor, and fantasy. Improvements in creativity as a result of contemplative
training have also been documented in high school and junior high school students (So and
Orme-Johnson 2001), offering further support for the notion that contemplative exercises in
childhood may foster children’s ability to creatively explore and learn from their environments.
Future Directions
Research in the area of contemplative practice and early childhood education is in its infancy.
Creative and rigorous designs are needed to determine how these practices and interventions
will be of greatest benefit to children. Below, we highlight directions for research that will
benefit investigations of contemplative practices for children.
First, it is important to elucidate the specific effects of different contemplative training
exercises, and how these differ developmentally. For example, concentration practices are
thought to foster sustained attention and concentration, increased clarity, and calmness of
mind. By contrast, mindfulness practices are believed to enhance self-insight, self-regulation,
compassion, and wisdom. Understanding the impact of different kinds of contemplative
practice, will not only provide important knowledge that may be used in applied settings but
also provide insight into basic developmental processes underlying age-related changes in such
fundamental skills as self-regulation.
In doing this work, it will be critical to use assessment tools that are age appropriate,
reliable, and valid. To fully understand the effects of contemplative exercises in the classroom,
future research should employ instruments tapping first-person (subjective), second-person
(e.g., peer, parent, or teacher report), and third-person (e.g., behavioral tasks or observations
and electrophysiological measures) outcomes. These assessments should target a broad scope
of outcomes, including not only self-regulation but also interpersonal relationships, ethical
behavior, and creativity and learning. When possible, outcomes should be assessed a year or
more following interventions, to assess whether interventions have lasting effects on
development.
Research on the efficacy of contemplative interventions must balance experimental rigor
with the fact that (true) contemplative practice requires participant “buy in.” By definition one
cannot engage in contemplative practice without an attitude of openness, curiosity, and
acceptance. Therefore, teachers and students who are skeptical of the benefits of contemplative
practice may not fully benefit from such activities. At the same time, teachers and researchers
who are enthusiastic about the potential benefits of contemplative practices must be equally
26 Educ Psychol Rev (2015) 27:1–30
interested in determining which approaches do NOT yield hypothesized benefits, and adjusting
their curricula and hypotheses accordingly. Randomized controlled designs are the gold
standard in clinical research, and it is essential that research on the benefits of contemplative
training during childhood include active control conditions involving a noncontemplative
program that controls for instructor attention, expectancies regarding outcomes, time commit-
ment, and other elements that provide structural equivalence to the contemplative practice
intervention. Community studies that identify “best practices” for introducing contemplation
into early childhood education classrooms are also necessary, to ensure that such exercises are
implemented in a way that is maximally beneficial.
Finally, future research should investigate the effects of contemplative exercises on teachers
and parents. A growing number of studies have shown that providing teachers with contem-
plative training may yield significant improvements on teachers’ well-being and their class-
room climate, potentially yielding benefits for children, even if children do not directly
participate in such activities. Similarly, engaging parents in contemplative exercises that can
be practiced individually or as a family may also facilitate the development of self-regulation
skills.
Conclusions
Contemplative practices for children are becoming increasingly widespread, and pre-
liminary evidence is encouraging. Preliminary empirical and theoretical evidence
supports the suggestion that introducing contemplative practices into childhood edu-
cation may cultivate healthy patterns of behavior and brain development that are
beneficial to children immediately and throughout their lifetime. Indeed, childhood
may be an especially opportune period to learn contemplative practices because of the
plasticity of relevant brain regions and the potential for cascading consequences of
any salubrious effects, such as a boost in self regulation.
Careful and nuanced consideration of potential pitfalls of introducing contemplative
practices to children must be considered. In addition, determining the most effective
means of cultivating self-regulation is complex. Self-regulation is multifaceted,
encompassing top–down processes (such as selective attention and working memory)
and bottom-up influences that may either impair self-control (e.g., cortisol/stress; e.g.,
Pechtel and Pizzagalli 2010; Sapolsky 1996) or boost it (e.g., dopamine/approach-
oriented emotions such as happiness and curiosity; e.g., Ashby et al. 1999).
Contemplative practices have the potential to address both of these types of process,
training top–down attentional skills while also disrupting the automatic elicitation of
emotional responses (e.g., by stimuli in the environment), resulting in greater calm-
ness and emotional stability (Zelazo and Lyons 2012).
This article represents a beginning step in the conversation exploring the potential
benefits of integrating contemplative practice into childhood education. Our interest is
to establish a foundation upon which further investigations can build, leading to
answers to the questions raised here, as well as to the articulation of new questions.
Future interdisciplinary and multifaceted research investigating the integration of
contemplative practices into early education holds significant potential for children’s
social, emotional, behavioral, and academic well-being, both short and long term.
Ideally, research and practice will inform one another other, developing and refining
contemplative practice interventions that can contribute best to childhood development
and well-being.
Educ Psychol Rev (2015) 27:1–30 27
Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank the Baumann Institute for providing funding for the
preparation of this article.
References
Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, A. U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its
influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106, 529–550.
Baer, R. A. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: a conceptual and empirical review. Clinical
Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 125–143.
Barkley, R. A. (1997). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, self-regulation, and time: toward a more com-
prehensive theory. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 18(4), 271–279.
Biegel, G. M., Brown, K. W., Shapiro, S. L., & Schubert, C. M. (2009). Mindfulness-based stress reduction for
the treatment of adolescent psychiatric outpatients: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and
Clinical Psychology, 77, 855–866.
Bierman, K. L., & Welsh, J. A. (1997). Social relationship deficits. In E. J. Mash & G. Lief (Eds.), Assessment of
childhood disorders (3rd edition) (pp. 328–365). New York: Guilford Press.
Bierman, K. L., Domitrovich, C. E., Nix, R. L., Gest, S. D., Welsh, J. A., Greenberg, M. T., Blair, C., Nelson, K.
E., & Gill, S. (2008). Promoting academic and social–emotional school readiness: the head start REDI
program. Child Development, 79, 1802–1817.
Blair, C., & Razza, R. P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to
emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Development, 78, 647–663.
Blair, K. A., Denham, S. A., Kochanoff, A., & Whipple, B. (2004). Playing it cool: temperament, emotion
regulation, and social behavior in preschoolers. Journal of School Psychology, 42, 419–443.
Boegels, S., Hoogstad, B., van Dun, L., de Schutter, S., & Restifo, K. (2008). Mindfulness training for
adolescents with externalizing disorders and their parents. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy,
36(2), 193–209.
Bryck, R. L., & Fisher, P. A. (2012). Training the brain: practical applications of neural plasticity from the
intersection of cognitive neuroscience, developmental psychology, and prevention science. American
Psychologist, 67, 87–100.
Burke, C. A. (2010). Mindfulness-based approaches with children and adolescents: a preliminary review of
current research in an emergent field. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19, 133–144.
Chambers, R., Lo, B. C. Y., & Allen, N. B. (2008). The impact of intensive mindfulness training on attentional
control, cognitive style, and affect. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32, 303–322.
Cole, P. M., Martin, S. E., & Dennis, T. A. (2004). Emotion regulation as a scientific construct: methodological
challenges and directions for child development research. Child Development, 75, 317–333.
Coulumbe, S., Davies, B., Howe, K., Potts, A., Ryan, C. & Day, D.S. (2011). Desired and perceived outcomes
related to an elementary school classroom-based yoga program as a basis for quantitative research studies.
Abstract presented at the International Association of Yoga Therapists, September, 2011, Kripalu Center.
Cowger, E. L., & Torrance, E. P. (1982). Further examination of the qualifying of changes in creative functioning
resulting from meditation (Zazen) training. Creative Child & Adult Quarterly, 7, 211–217.
Davidson, R. J. (2010). Empirical explorations of mindfulness: conceptual and methodological issues. Emotion,
10, 8–11.
Diamond, A., & Lee, K. (2011). Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to
12 years old. Science, 333, 959–964.
Duckworth, A. L., Grant, H., Loew, B., Oettingen, G., & Peter, M. G. (2011). Self-regulation strategies improve
self-discipline in adolescents: benefits of mental contrasting and implementation intentions. Educational
Psychology, 31(1), 17.
Eigsti, I., Zayas, V., Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., Ayduk, O., Dadlani, M. B., & Casey, B. J. (2006). Predicting
cognitive control from preschool to late adolescence and young adulthood. Psychological Science, 17(6),
478–484.
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Guthrie, I. K., & Reiser, M. (2002). The role of emotionality and regulation
in children’s social competence and adjustment. In L. Pulkkinen & A. Caspi (Eds.), Paths to
successful development: personality in the life course (pp. 46–70). New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Flavell, J. H., Green, F. L., & Flavell, E. R. (1995). Young children’s knowledge about thinking. Monographs of
the Society for Research in Child Development, 60, 1–96.
Flavell, J. H., Green, F. L., & Flavell, E. R. (2000). Development of children’s awareness of their own thoughts.
Journal of Cognition and Development, 1, 97–112.
28 Educ Psychol Rev (2015) 27:1–30
Flook, L., Smalley, S. L., Kitil, M. J., Galla, B. M., Kaiser-Greenland, S., Locke, J., Ishijima, E., & Kasari, C.
(2010). Effects of mindful awareness practices on executive functions in elementary school children. Journal
of Applied School Psychology, 26, 70–95.
Goldin, P. R., & Gross, J. J. (2010). Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) on emotion regulation
in social anxiety disorder. Emotion, 10, 83–91.
Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39,
281–291.
Harper, J. C. (2010). Yoga therapy in practice: teaching Yoga in urban elementary schools. International Journal
of Yoga Therapy, 20, 100–110.
Hart, T. (2004). Opening the contemplative mind in the classroom. Journal of Transformative Education, 2, 28–46.
Heeren, A., Van Broeck, N., & Philippot, P. (2009). The effects of mindfulness on executive processes and
autobiographical memory specificity. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47, 403–409.
Hughes, C., & Ensor, R. (2011). Individual differences in growth in executive function across the transition to
school predict externalizing and internalizing behaviors and self-perceived academic success at 6 years of
age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(3), 663–676.
Huppert, F. A., & Johnson, D. M. (2010). A controlled trial of mindfulness training in schools: the importance of
practice for an impact on well-being. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 264–274. doi:10.1080/
17439761003794148.
Huttenlocher, P. R. (2002). Neural plasticity: The effects of environment on the development of the cerebral
cortex. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J., & Shah, P. (2011). Short- and long-term benefits of cognitive training.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(25), 10081.
Jha, A. J., Krompinger, J., & Baime, M. J. (2007). Mindfulness training modifies subsystems of attention.
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 109–119.
Johnson, A. E., Forston, J. L., Gunnar, M. R., & Zelazo, P. D. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of
mindfulness meditation training in preschool children. Submitted.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology:
Science and Practice, 10, 144–156.
Kaiser-Greenland, S. (2010). The mindful child. New York: Free Press.
Kapur, S., Craik, F. I. M., Tulving, E., Wilson, A. A., Houle, S., & Brown, G. M. (1994). Neuroanatomical
correlates of encoding in episodic memory: levels of processing effect. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences of the United States of America, 91, 2008–2111.
Lantieri, L. (2008). Building emotional intelligence: techniques to cultivate inner strength in children. Boulder,
CO: Sounds True.
Liehr, P., & Diaz, N. (2010). A pilot study examining the effect of mindfulness on depression and anxiety for
minority children. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 24, 69–71.
Lyons, K. E., & Ghetti, S. (2010). Metacognitive development in early childhood: new questions about old
assumptions. In A. Efklides & P. Misailidi (Eds.), Trends and prospects in metacognition research (pp. 259–
278). New York: Springer.
Marcovitch, S., Jacques, S., Boseovski, J. J., & Zelazo, P. D. (2008). Self-reflection and the cognitive control of
behavior: implications for learning. Mind Brain and Education, 2, 136–141.
McClelland, M. M., Cameron, C. E., Connor, C. M., Farris, C. L., Jewkes, A. M., & Morrison, F. J. (2007). Links
between behavioral regulation and preschoolers’ literacy, vocabulary, and math skills. Developmental
Psychology, 43, 947–959.
Mendelson, T., Greenberg, M. T., Dariotis, J. K., Gould, L. F., Rhoades, B. L., & Leaf, P. J. (2010). Feasibility
and preliminary outcomes of a school-based mindfulness intervention for urban youth. Journal of Abnormal
Child Psychology, 38(7), 985–994.
Metis Associates (2011). Building inner resilience in teachers and their students: results of the inner resilience
pilot program. Retrieved on 12-3-2012 from http://innerresilience.org/ documents/IRP_Pilot_Program_
Results_AERA2011_updated_6.9.pdf.
Miller, Richard C., Butler, Britta (2011). iRest For Kids. Integrative Restoration Institute, 900 5th Ave., Suite
203, San Rafael, CA 94901. See also: www.irest.us/node/338.
Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., Houts, R., Poulton, R.,
Roberts, B. W., Ross, S., Sears, M. R., Thomson, W. M., & Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-
control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 108(7),
2693–2698.
Napoli, M., Krech, P. R., & Holley, L. C. (2005). Mindfulness training for elementary school students: the
attention academy. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 21, 99–125.
Neff, K. D. (2003). The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2,
223–250.
Educ Psychol Rev (2015) 27:1–30 29
Nidich, S. I., Ryncarz, R. A., Abrams, A. I., Orme-Johnson, D. W., & Wallace, R. K. (1983). Kohlbergian cosmic
perspective responses, EEG coherence, and the TM and TM-Sidhi program. Journal of Moral Education,
12, 166–173.
Nidich, S. M., Shujaa Nidich, R., Rainforth, M., Grant, J., Valosek, L., Chang, W., & Zigler, R. L. (2011).
Academic achievement and transcendental meditation: a study with at-risk urban middle school students.
Education, 131(3), 556–565.
Ortner, C. N. M., Kilner, S. J., & Zelazo, P. D. (2007). Mindfulness meditation and reduced emotional
interference on a cognitive task. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 271–283.
Orzech, K., Shapiro, S. L., & Brown, K. (2009). Intensive mindfulness training-related changes in cognitive and
emotional experience. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(3), 212–222.
Ozonoff, S., Pennington, B. F., & Rogers, S. J. (1991). Executive function deficits in high-functioning autistic
individuals: relationship to theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32(7), 1081–1105.
Pechtel, P., & Pizzagalli, D. (2010). Effects of early life stress on cognitive and affective function: an intergrated
review of human literature. Psychopharmacology, 214, 1–3.
Ramani, G. B., Brownell, C. A., & Campbell, S. B. (2010). Positive and negative peer interaction in 3- and 4-
year-olds in relation to regulation and dysregulation. The Journal of Genetic Psychology: Research and
Theory on Human Development, 171, 218–250.
Raver, C. C. (2004). Placing emotional self-regulation in sociocultural and socioeconomic contexts. Child
Development, 75, 346–353.
Rubin, K. H., Coplan, R. J., Fox, N. A., & Calkins, S. D. (1995). Emotionality, emotion regulation, and
preschoolers’ social adaptation. Development and Psychopathology. Special Issues: Emotions in develop-
mental psychopathology, 7, 49–62.
Rueda, M. R., Rothbart, M. K., McCandliss, B. D., Saccomanno, L., & Posner, M. I. (2005). Training,
maturation, and genetic influences on the development of executive attention. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, 102, 14931–14936.
Saltzman, A., & Goldin, P. (2008). Mindfulness based stress reduction for school-age children. In S. C. Hayes &
L. A. Greco (Eds.), Acceptance and mindfulness interventions for children, adolescents and families (pp.
139–161). Oakland, CA: Context Press/New Harbinger.
Sapolsky, R. M. (1996). Why stress is bad for your brain. Science, 273, 749–750.
Semple, R. J., Lee, J., Rosa, D., & Miller, L. F. (2010). A randomized trial of mindfulness-based cognitive
therapy for children: promoting mindful attention to enhance social–emotional resiliency in children.
Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19, 218–229.
Shapiro, S. L., & Carlson, L. E. (2009). The art and science of mindfulness: integrating mindfulness into
psychology and the helping professions. Washington, D.C.: American Psychology Press.
Shapiro, S. L., Schwartz, G. E., & Bonner, G. (1998). Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on medical
and premedical students. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 581–599.
Shapiro, S. L., Astin, J. A., Bishop, S. R., & Cordova, M. (2005). Mindfulness based stress reduction for health
care professionals: results from a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Stress Management,
12, 164–176.
Shapiro, S. L., Brown, K. W., & Beigel, G. M. (2006). Teaching self-care to caregivers: Effects of mindfulness-
based stress reduction on the mental health of mental health therapists in training. Training and Education in
Professional Psychology, 1, 105–115.
Shapiro, S.L., Jazzeri, H., Golden, P. (2012). Effects of mindfulness training on ethics. Mindfulness, 2-12.
Slagter, H. A., Lutz, A., Greisschar, L. L., Nieuwenhuis, S., & Davidson, R. J. (2009). Theta phase synchrony
and conscious target perception: impact of intensive mental training. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21,
1536–1549.
Slagter, H. A., Davidson, R. J., & Lutz, A. (2011). Mental training as a tool in the neuroscientific study of brain
and cognitive plasticity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 1–12.
So, K., & Orme-Johnson, D. W. (2001). Three randomized experiments on the longitudinal effects of the
transcendental meditation technique on cognition. Intelligence, 29, 419–440.
Stiles, J. (2008). The fundamentals of brain development: integrating nature and nurture. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Teasdale, J. D., Moore, R. G., Hayhurst, H., Pope, M., Williams, S., & Segal, Z. V. (2002). Metacognitive
awareness and prevention of relapse in depression: empirical evidence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Psychology, 70, 275–287.
Van der Oord, S., Bögels, S. M., & Peijnenburg, D. (2012). The effectiveness of mindfulness training for children
with ADHD and mindful parenting for their parents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 21(1), 139–147.
Walsh, R., & Shapiro, S. L. (2006). The meeting of meditative disciplines and western psychology: a mutually
enriching dialogue. The American Psychologist, 61(3), 227–239.
Wellman, H. M., & Liu, D. (2004). Scaling of theory-of-mind tasks. Child Development, 75, 523–541.
30 Educ Psychol Rev (2015) 27:1–30
Wisner, B., Jones, B., & Gwin, D. (2010). School-based meditation practices for adolescents: a resource for
strengthening self-regulation, emotional coping, and self-esteem. Children & Schools, 32, 150–159.
Zeidan, F., Johnson, S. K., Diamond, B. J., David, Z., & Goolkasian, P. (2010). Mindfulness meditation improves
cognition: evidence of brief mental training. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 19,
597–605.
Zelazo, P. D. (2004). The development of conscious control in childhood. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 12–17.
Zelazo, P. D., & Lyons, K. E. (2012). The potential benefits of mindfulness training in early childhood: a
developmental social cognitive neuroscience perspective. Child Development Perspectives, 6, 154–160.
Zelazo, P. D., Muller, U., Frye, D., & Marcovitch, S. (2003). The development of executive function in early
childhood. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 68(3), Serial No. 274.
Zylowska, L., Ackerman, D. L., Yang, M. H., Futrell, J. L., Horton, N. L., Hale, T. S., Pataki, C., & Smalley, S. L.
(2008). Mindfulness meditation training in adults and adolescents with ADHD: a feasibility study. Journal of
Attention Disorders, 11, 737–746.