This document discusses the challenges of achieving enthusiastic consent in a culture with problematic views around gender, sexuality, and consent. It notes that consent requires a clear "yes" rather than the absence of a "no", but many are taught that silence or coercion can constitute consent. The author argues that subcultures also often mirror these problematic dominant cultural values, and advocates for respecting boundaries and communicating openly to establish genuine consent.
Original Description:
Original Title
Professor Calamity, Alan Moore, Luna Celeste & others - A Steampunk's Guide to Sex-133
This document discusses the challenges of achieving enthusiastic consent in a culture with problematic views around gender, sexuality, and consent. It notes that consent requires a clear "yes" rather than the absence of a "no", but many are taught that silence or coercion can constitute consent. The author argues that subcultures also often mirror these problematic dominant cultural values, and advocates for respecting boundaries and communicating openly to establish genuine consent.
This document discusses the challenges of achieving enthusiastic consent in a culture with problematic views around gender, sexuality, and consent. It notes that consent requires a clear "yes" rather than the absence of a "no", but many are taught that silence or coercion can constitute consent. The author argues that subcultures also often mirror these problematic dominant cultural values, and advocates for respecting boundaries and communicating openly to establish genuine consent.
As the adage goes: “Consent is the presence of a ‘yes,’
not the absence of a ‘no.’” In a culture rife with gendered dou- ble-standards, shaming of certain types of bodies or desires, a de-emphasis on healthy communication, and some highly- problematic ideas with regards to sexual entitlement over other people’s bodies (particularly the bodies of those not identified as “male”), it’s no wonder why conveying a genuine, emphatic “yes” or “no” can be particularly trying! We are taught, implic- itly or explicitly, that silence constitutes consent (it doesn’t), and that badgering, begging, or threatening an “okay” out of the objects of our desire is “good enough” consent (it isn’t). Unfortunately, the subcultures we create, refine, feel drawn to, or take refuge in often mirror many of these absurd val- ues of the dominant culture. In the practice of good consent, we endeavour to better respect one another’s boundaries, to . 127 .