You are on page 1of 5

Issuer Acronym Serial No. Rev.

Page

Technip KT India Ltd. ENG PR 011 1 1/5

DESIGN REVIEW

Appendices : Annexure – 1 Checklists

1.0 PURPOSE

1 24/03/09 Revised as per Document Control Procedure VKR SNDS DKM


0 30/04/07 Implemented SNDS DKM DKM
Rev Date DESCRIPTION WRITTEN BY CHECKED BY APPROVED BY
DD/MM/YY (name & sign) (name & sign) (name & sign)

DOCIMENT REVISION
Copies are not Controlled
Issuer Acronym Serial No. Rev. Page

Technip KT India Ltd. ENG PR 011 1 2/5

DESIGN REVIEW

The purpose of this procedure is to define the method of doing design review.

2.0 APPLICATION

This procedure applies to Process and to all engineering disciplines.

This procedure is to be implemented to all the Projects starting from 732.

3.0 DEFINITION
Design Review is compliance of design with contractual requirements and optimisation &
verification of design integrity

4.0 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

TPKTI Quality Manual


TPKTI Quality Procedures
Project Quality Plan
Departmental Quality Plan
Checklists (As per Annexure-1)

5.0 PROCEDURE

5.1 OBJECTIVE
The objectives of design reviews are to ensure:
 The compliance of the design with contractual requirements,
 Verification of design integrity,
 Optimisation of the design to the extent required by project management, including
incorporation of all available experience and feed back from similar or comparable design
situations.
 Compliance to the laid down procedures and guidelines.
Design reviews aim at providing reinforcement to the design activity from a source independent of
the project team, by obtaining assurance that all appropriate measures have been taken in the
design process. Design reviews should confirm that the design can advance from one stage to the
next, e.g. from conceptual to detailed design or from design to fabrication/ construction.

The intent of the Design Review is not to verify the individual calculation & drawings produced by the
Project team but to verify the overall integrity of design to avoid technical & financial risks.

5.2 REVIEWERS
Engineers who are of a level of qualification and experience equivalent to or higher than that of the
project lead discipline engineers carry out the design reviews. The review leaders are independent of
the project execution organization.
The participants in design reviews are:
 Review leader
 Project discipline leader
 Engineers who are involved in the design activity, designated by the discipline leader .
 Section / Department heads
 Project engineering manager / project engineers (on their initiative).

5.3 CONTENT OF DESIGN REVIEW

Copies are not Controlled


Issuer Acronym Serial No. Rev. Page

Technip KT India Ltd. ENG PR 011 1 3/5

DESIGN REVIEW

5.3.1 Schedule of Reviews


Design reviews are planned to take place at the completion of key/ critical design activities
or stages. The review schedule is established early in the design process and formalised in the
discipline quality plan.

Action: Discipline leader/Departmental quality management; to be approved by Section Head.

Input Data and Deliverables


Before the review, the discipline leader provides the review leader with:

 The input data on which the design activity are based (extracts from contract, discipline, design
basis, project basis of design, data sheets, job specifications, etc.),
 The deliverables produced by the project team (drawings, calculations, requisitions, etc.).
It should be noted that:
 The discipline leader should be selective in providing only the essential documentation to the
review leader, i.e. the quantity should be limited to avoid "submerging" the reviewer,
 The review leader should be adequately familiarized with the documents before the review itself,
whose purpose is not to review documentation jointly with the project team but to enable an in-
depth exchange and recording of technical positions.

5.3.2 Check Lists


The review leader, in conjunction with the departmental quality management, prepares a check list,
which runs through the decisional process involved in the design activity. These check lists serve as
a guide or reminder for use by the review leader during the review, and will be attached to the review
report as his confirmation that the key elements of the process have been validated.
Check lists are standardized at the departmental level, but in the context of each project the specific
points of the lists and the relative importance accorded to them will vary. List of the checklist is
attached in annexure I, however the contents of the checklists are to be updated by Section /
Department Heads and to be placed in respective DRBs.

5.3.3 Review
During the review, the review leader interviews the project discipline leader and discipline team
members. Areas examined may typically include:
 Specific context of the project / project management objectives
 Degree of flexibility available at the outset and during the development of the design process
 Translation of contractual requirements into design output
 Exploring of potential areas of optimisation
 Incorporation of feedback from similar / comparable projects
 Impacts of design choices on constructability
 Identification and measurement of areas of technical and financial risk.

The standard duration of a design review is half a day, which of course can vary depending on the
context / subject matter to be covered.

5.4 DESIGN REVIEW REPORT


The results of the review are discussed and agreed upon between the review leader and the project
discipline leader during and at the conclusion of the review. The report consists of:
 Completed check list, prepared and signed by the review leader, the project discipline leader,

Copies are not Controlled


Issuer Acronym Serial No. Rev. Page

Technip KT India Ltd. ENG PR 011 1 4/5

DESIGN REVIEW

and the section head.


● List of points raised in the review, which warrant further investigation and/or follow-up action,
including responsibilities for action and scheduled completion date, with the same signatories as
the check list.

The review report should conclude by stipulating:


"On the condition that the outstanding points listed above are cleared, the present review is
pronounced satisfactory. This stage of the design is consequently validated."

5.5 ACTION PLAN


The review check lists and reports are maintained in the project discipline file/ DDB by the discipline
leader.
As action items are closed out the results are recorded manually in the review report, with date of
close-out, by the discipline leader. The action is verified and signed off by the review leader.
Scanned copy of the same is to be maintained in DDB/ project discipline file.
The Section Head who participated in the review periodically checks the status of actions with the
discipline leader, if required.

6.0 RESPONSIBILITY
Sectional Heads / Discipline Lead Engineers

ANNEXURE - 1

S. No. Document
Process
Copies are not Controlled
Issuer Acronym Serial No. Rev. Page

Technip KT India Ltd. ENG PR 011 1 5/5

DESIGN REVIEW

1. Checklist of PDS for Heat Exchanger


2. Checklist for Heater Simulation
3. Checklist for Heat & Tube Exchanger
Combustion – Heaters
1. Checklist for Heater Structure Design
2. Checklist for Preparation of Heater G.A.D.
3. Checklist for Requisitions (General)
4. Checklist for Self Supporting Stack Design
5. Checklist-interfacings-All
Combustion – Furnace
1. Checklist – Furnace Pressure Part Calculations
2. Checklist – Furnace Self Supporting Stack Design
3. Checklist – Furnace Tube Support Calculations
4. Checklist – Furnace Structure Design
Electrical
1. Area classification check-list
2. Design basis check-list
3. Single line diagram check-list
4. Substation Equpt. Layout – check-list
Civil
1. Critical Documents Check – list Civil – Structural
2. Design Basis check – list – Civil – Structural
3. Design Review Check – list – Civil – Structural
4. Feedback check – list – Civil – Structural
5. Optimisation check – list – Civil – Structural
Piping
1. Technical Quality Review and Measurement – Piping Section
Mechanical
1. Check list for Design / MDS for S & T Heat Exchanger
2. Design for Pressure & Columns
Instrumentation
1. Check – list for Inst. Cable Routing
2. Check – list for Flow Elements
3. Check – list for Control Valves / Shutdown Valves
4. Check – list for Safety Relief Valves
5. Check – list for Analysers

Copies are not Controlled

You might also like