Nguyễn Xuân Dung discusses the debate around how animals should be treated. Some believe animals should have equal rights as humans, while others argue animals are not as intellectually developed as humans. The essay argues that while animals should have their basic needs met, such as food, water and safe treatment, they cannot be considered equal to humans due to lacking human-like intelligence and mental abilities. Therefore, animals can be used for purposes like research or food, but not in an inhumane or aggressive manner.
Nguyễn Xuân Dung discusses the debate around how animals should be treated. Some believe animals should have equal rights as humans, while others argue animals are not as intellectually developed as humans. The essay argues that while animals should have their basic needs met, such as food, water and safe treatment, they cannot be considered equal to humans due to lacking human-like intelligence and mental abilities. Therefore, animals can be used for purposes like research or food, but not in an inhumane or aggressive manner.
Nguyễn Xuân Dung discusses the debate around how animals should be treated. Some believe animals should have equal rights as humans, while others argue animals are not as intellectually developed as humans. The essay argues that while animals should have their basic needs met, such as food, water and safe treatment, they cannot be considered equal to humans due to lacking human-like intelligence and mental abilities. Therefore, animals can be used for purposes like research or food, but not in an inhumane or aggressive manner.
In our modern society, it is commonly thought that animals should not be
exploited and should be treated equally to humans. Other groups believe that since animals are not on the same level as humans, they can be used as pets or as food and for seminars. The following essay will discuss that as animals lack human-like intellectual capacity and mental faculties, they cannot exist on par with humans. On the one hand, a considerable number of people feel that animals had better grant the rights as individuals have. To explain, having a safe place to live and a reliable food source is a minor right of all living things on this planet, including pets and animals. One of the compelling arguments is that using animals for unneeded purposes in businesses like food and fashion should be prohibited. It would be inhumane to exploit other beings through the fashion industry, and meat and animal products can take the place of greenery in the food industry. On the other hand, some people disagree, contending that the public will never be at the same level as animals due to cerebral capacity and cognitive skills. Therefore, it is without a doubt that giving animals their fundamental necessities, such as food, water and safe treatment, is essential. Besides, animals can be employed in study or for food purposes, but not in an aggressive manner. In conclusion, although animals have contributed to the development of science, they should not be exploited since all living entities possess emotional sentiments. I believe that using animals for our own enjoyment must be stopped and we should eliminate the threat of animal exploitation.