Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evaluation Of The Centre For Strong Communities Project Proposal By Mekis University
Your Name
Introduction
Ihtawinton, Ontario. This project seeks to build additional public facilities, such as classrooms,
labs and libraries. This report will examine the appropriateness of this project given the local
context of Ihtawinton, its financial sustainability, and its social and environmental
responsibility. The results of this assessment will be used to determine if the Building
Sustainable Communities Fund should accept, reject with follow up, or completely reject this
proposal. Additionally, recommendations for continued action will also be provided based on
these findings.
This project has great potential to have a positive impact on the community of
Ihtawinton, Ontario. The Centre for Strong Communities will likely create some jobs in
construction, engineering and design as well as many additional temporary jobs. According to
the proposal, the proposed construction project is expected to create 5 permanent full-time
equivalent jobs and 100 temporary full-time equivalent jobs in the local economy. This would
create employment and boost to the local economy. Furthermore, the Centre's purpose is to
foster stronger relationships with the community, providing educational resources and training
programs which can have positive benefits on the health and wellbeing of local people.
Additionally, its goal of reducing energy costs can have long-term environmental benefits in
generated by this project will stay in the community, helping it to continue to grow and
3
prosper. The additional services provided by the Centre for Strong Communities project will
benefit both staff and students at Mekis University in a number of ways. For starters, the
Centre will provide educational resources to staff and students that they may not have
otherwise had access to, such as specialized training programs or seminars on various topics
related to their field. Assuming the high quality of education is maintained, the project will be
able to generate talent for the community. Furthermore, it is anticipated that the additional
services provided by this project will benefit both staff and students at the university.
Additionally, this proposed project also aligns with several of the guidelines established by the
Building Sustainable Communities Fund. The Building Sustainable Communities Fund outlines
that projects should focus on building “capacity for social and economic growth”, which this
The proposed construction project appears to be appropriate given the local context of
Ihtawinton, Ontario. The proposal to build the Centre for Strong Communities is a project that
responds to local needs and builds on local assets. The Centre will provide educational
resources, talent creation, job opportunities, and access to specialized training programs, all of
which are in line with the increasing number of students Ihtawinton's and overall higher
enrollment in the university. Additionally, it will work to reduce energy costs through improved
building insulation, an effort which will help families in the area save money in the long run.
Finally, its aim to foster stronger relationships with the community by providing activities and
events can have positive effects on both social cohesion and economic stability. All of these
4
factors combine to make this project a sensible choice for Ihtawinton that could potentially lead
The financial sustainability of the proposal is ideal because the project is supported by
multiple credible sources, including the Mekis University Capital Fund, public, and private
fundraising. The total requested from the Building Sustainable Communities Fund is
Ministry of Economic Development, Job Creation and Trade; $1 million from the City of
Ihtawinton; $1 million in naming rights; and $400,000 in additional private fundraising. This
ensures that there are enough funds to cover all costs associated with construction materials
and labour as well as MERCs (Mandatory Employment Related Costs). Additionally, contingency
funds are available should any unanticipated costs arise during the project. According to the
proposal, the applicants intend to pay for the project without debt financing and intend to
integrate the new facilities to the existing management system so that a significant portion of
the total operating costs will be generated from the enrollments. However, the proposed
budget does not meet the criteria under the third guidelines of Building Sustainable
Communities Fund “Ineligible Expenses”. This is because the budget includes contingency costs
and administrative costs that are ineligible according to the Building Sustainable Communities
Fund.
Additionally, in order to ensure that this project is socially responsible, the applicant has
proposed providing health insurance and pension plans for the employees working on this
5
project which meet the criteria in the first guideline for the Building Sustainable Communities
Fund. This shows that they are taking into account social concerns when planning the project
and have thoughtfully considered how their actions will impact those who are employed by this
project. Finally, the applicant has also outlined a plan for minimizing any negative
environmental impacts that may arise from the construction process. This includes using
sustainable building materials and practices such as recycling and reusing materials whenever
possible. Overall, the proposal meets both the financial sustainability and social/environmental
responsibility criteria set out by Program Guidelines: Building Sustainable Communities Fund. In
doing so it makes a strong case for its ability to create a thriving economic system for
Recommendation
Based on the information provided in this report, it is recommended that the Building
Sustainable Communities Fund reject proposed construction project with follow-up. The
Building Sustainable Communities program should therefore work with the applicant to
improve section 3: Project Costs in order to exclude the ineligible expenses. The project is
otherwise socially responsible, while also having a positive impact on the local economy and
environment. In addition, it meets the other criteria set out by the Building Sustainable
Communities Fund and appears to be appropriate given the community’s current needs and
assets. Therefore, accepting the project after the necessary adjustments would provide an
opportunity for the city to further develop its infrastructure while also creating new jobs. After
approval of funds allocation, the applicant should be instructed to continue with the project
6
and submit a report on the progress of their construction efforts at regular intervals in order to