Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTIONS
From the previous lesson, we learned that allele frequencies of a large population do not
change over time in the absence of evolutionary processes such as natural selection, mutation,
and non-random mating after attaining fixation. If there are observed changes in allele
frequencies, it is usually very close to the expected frequencies. This assumption is generally
based on Hardy–Weinberg Model. Further, we learned also that when each evolutionary
process is operating, allele frequencies may eventually change. For instance, when natural
selection is operating, selection coefficient (s) is measured to obtain the fitness reduction of
phenotypes from a certain environment. In this sense, the larger the s the stronger the action
of natural selection on an allele frequency in the population. The allele with larger s changes
the frequencies faster and would eventually reach fixation earlier.
However, what do you think will happen to allele frequencies in a small population? In a small
population, the realized frequencies will not always be close to the expected frequencies.
Entirely different from the frequencies in a large population. A null model for a small
population that serves as the baseline, counterpart of the Hardy-Weinberg Model, is the
Wright-Fisher model. We will further learn the details below about how frequencies of alleles
will be changing.
ABSTRACTION
Kindly follow this example: The remaining population of Philippine Eagles is only 1000.
Assuming that the breeding population of the male is 300 and the female has 400 individuals,
what is the effective population of the Philippine Eagles?
Questions:
1) Describe the current status of the genetic diversity of the Philippine Eagle, Philippine
Cockatoo, and Philippine Tamaraw.
2) Which of the three species is currently experiencing an extreme population bottleneck?
Why?
CLOSURE
Congratulations!