You are on page 1of 4

Chapter 1: MEANING AND RELEVANCE OF HISTORY

READINGS IN PHILIPPINE HISTORY (1210)


BSN1B - PROF. Dinah L. Nival - 1st Sem 2022

History collaborating with other disciplines as its


- is the study of the past, the events that auxiliary disciplines.
happened, and the causes of such
events. Archaeologists
- derived from the Greek word historia - Artifacts
– which means “knowledge acquired Linguists
through inquiry or investigation.” - Language
- It has existed for around 2,400 years Scientists
and is as old as Mathematics and - Analyzation of past genetic and DNA
Philosophy.
- Historia (Latin) the account of the Roles of History
past of a person or of a group of - States use it to unite a nation.
people through written documents - A tool to legitimize regimes and forge
and historical evidence. a sense of collective identity through
- Is focused on wars, revolution, and collective memory
other breakthroughs. - To learn from past mistakes
Traditional Historians - To inspire people to keep moving
- Lived with a mantra - “ No forward.
document no history”
Historiography POSITIVISM
- Is the history of history. (How was it - A school of thought that emerged
written? Who wrote it? What was the between the 18th and 19th century.
context of publication? What historical - Requires empirical and observable
method was employed? What sources evidence.
were used?) - Adheres to the mantra “no document,
History - Culture - Literature no history”.
- These three are intertwined with each - Positivist Historians are expected to be
other. objective and impartial in their
- Language is part of culture arguments and conduct of historical
Historical sources research.
- Valid sources are not limited to written POSTCOLONIALISM
documents such as government - A school of thought that emerged in
records, chroniclers’ accounts or the early 20th century.
personal letters. Postcolonial History
- Some pass their history through word - is a reaction and an alternative to the
of mouth. colonial history that colonial powers
created and taught to their subject.
Historical sources which may not be in - It looks at two things in writing history:
written form but were just as valid were 1. to tell the history of their nation that
recognized by historians: will highlight their identity free from
1. Oral traditions in forms of epics and that colonial discourse and
songs knowledge.
2. Artifacts 2. to criticize the methods, effects and
3. Architecture and memory ideas of colonialism.
HISTORY AND HISTORIAN
History became more inclusive and started

1
Chapter 1: MEANING AND RELEVANCE OF HISTORY
READINGS IN PHILIPPINE HISTORY (1210)
BSN1B - PROF. Dinah L. Nival - 1st Sem 2022

Any history that has been taught and If a historian chooses to use an oral
written is always intended for a certain account as hisdata in studying the ethnic
group. history of the Ifugaos in the Cordillera
during the American Occupation, he has to
E.g. validate the claims of his informants by
When the Ilustrados (Jose Rizal, Isabelo comparing and corroborating it with
delos Santos & Pedro Paterno) wrote written sources. Therefore the historian can
history, they intended it for the Spaniards balance biases by relying on evidence that
so that they would realize that Filipinos are back up his claim.
people of their own intellect and culture.
THE ANNALES SCHOOL OF HISTORY
When American historians depicted the - is a school of history born in France
Filipino people as uncivilized in their that challenged the canons of history.
publication, they intended that narrative (common historical subjects related
for their fellow Americans to justify their to conduct of states and monarchs)
colonization of the islands. E.g.,
The history of peasantry
The history of medicine
Historian
The history of environment
- Seek historical evidence and facts
- They advocated that history from
- give meaning to facts and organize
below – that the people and classes
them into a timeline, establish causes
who were not reflected in the history of
and write history.
the society in the grand manner be
- a person of his own influenced by his
provided with space in the records of
own context, environment, ideology,
mankind.
education, and influences.
- Annales scholars married history with
- interpretation of the historical fact is
other disciplines like; Geography,
affected by the historians context and
Anthropology, Archaeology, and
circumstances.
Linguistics.
- subjectivity will inevitably influence the
process
- of his historical research; the
methodology that he will use, the facts
that he shall select and deemed
relevant, his interpretation, and even
the form of his writings.
IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER,
HISTORY IS ALWAYS SUBJECTIVE

Historical methodology
Comprises certain techniques and rules
that historians follow in order to properly
utilize sources and historical evidence in
writing history.

E.g.

2
CHAPTER 1: DISTINCTION OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SOURCES
READINGS IN PHILIPPINE HISTORY (1210)
BSN1B - PROF. Dinah L. Nival - 1st Sem 2022

HISTORICAL SOURCES In writing the book , Agoncillo used primary


Can be classified between primary and sources with his research like:
secondary sources. - Documents of the Katipunan
The classification of sources between - Interview with the veterans of the
these two categories depends on the revolution
historical subject being studied. - Correspondence between and among
Primary sources Katipuneros.
- are those sources produced at the
same time as the event, period, or The classification of sources between the
subject being studied. two categories of sources depends on the
- E.g. Archival documents, artifacts, historical subject being studied.
memorabilia, census, letters, A textbook is usually classified as a
government records. secondary or tertiary source.
If a historian chooses to write the history of
education in the 1980s, he can utilize
If a historian wishes to study the
Commonwealth Constitution Convention textbooks used in the period as primary
of 1935, his primary sources can include : sources.
- Minutes of the Convention If a historian wishes to study the
historiography of the Filipino—American
- Newspaper clippings
War he can use works of different authors
- Philippine Constitution reports of the
U.S. Commissioners on the topic as his primary source.
- Records of the convention
- The draft of the constitution EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL CRITICISM
- Photographs of the event External Criticism
- Eyewitness accounts of convention is the practice of verifying the authenticity
delegates and their memoirs of evidence by examining its physical
Secondary Sources characteristics;consistency with the
- are those sources which were historical characteristic of the time it was
produced by an author who used produced; and the materials used for
primary sources to produce the evidence.(E.g., Ex. The quality of paper, the
material. type of the ink, the language used in the
- are historical sources which studied a material).
certain historical subject. Internal Criticism
E.g. It is the examination of the truthfulness of
On the subject of the Philippine Revolution the evidence. It looks at the content of the
of 1896, students can read Teodoro source and examines the circumstances of
Agoncillo’s Revolt of the Masses: The Story its production.
of Bonifacio and the Katipunan published It looks at the truthfulness and factuality of
originally in 1956. The Philippine Revolution the evidence by looking at the author of
happened in the last years of the the source, its context, the agenda behind
nineteenth century whileAgoncillo its creation, the knowledge which informed
published his work in 1956, which makes it, and its intended purpose.
the book a secondary source.

3
Chapter 1: PHILIPPINE HISTORIOGRAPHY
READINGS IN PHILIPPINE HISTORY (1210)
BSN1B - PROF. Dinah L. Nival - 1st Sem 2022

Why is it important to validate historical


sources?
Validating historical sources is important
because the use of unverified, falsified, and
untruthful historical sources can lead to
equally false conclusions. Without
thorough criticisms of historical evidence,
historical deceptions and lies will be highly
probable.

PHILIPPINE HISTORIOGRAPHY
Ancient Filipinos narrated their history
through communal songs and epics that
they passed orally from a generation to
another. When the Spaniards came, their
chroniclers started recording their
observations through written accounts.

The Spanish colonizers narrated the history


of their colony in a bipartite view. They
saw the age of colonization as a dark
period in history of the islands, until they
brought light through Western thought
and Christianity.

Early nationalist refuted this perspective


and argued the tripartite view. They saw
the pre colonial society as a luminous age
that ended with darkness when the
colonizers captured their freedom.They
Believed that the light would come again
once the colonizers were evicted from
thePhilippines.

Filipino historian Zeus Salazar introduced


the new guiding Philosophy for writing and
teaching history: Pantayong Pananaw (for
us- from us perspective).
This perspective highlights the importance
of facilitating an internal conversation and
discourse among Filipinos about our own
history, using the language that is
understood by everyone.

You might also like