Regionalism: Definition and Examples

 
Regionalism is the development of political, economic, or social systems based on
loyalty to a distinct geographic region with a largely ideologically and culturally
homogeneous population. Regionalism often leads to formally agreed to
arrangements between groups of countries intended to express a common sense
of identity while achieving common goals and improving quality of life. 

Key Takeaways: Regionalism

 Regionalism is the development of political and economic systems based on

loyalty to distinct geographic regions.
 Regionalism often results in formal political or economic arrangements
between groups of countries intended to achieve common goals. 
 Regionalism flourished after the end of the Cold War and the global
dominance of the two superpowers. 
 Economic regionalism results in formal multinational agreements intended
to enable the free flow of goods and services between countries.

Old and New Regionalism

Attempts to establish such regionalist initiatives began in the 1950s. Sometimes

called the period of “old regionalism,” these early initiatives largely failed, with
the exception of the establishment of the European Community in 1957. Today’s
period of “new regionalism” began after the end of the Cold War, the fall of the
Berlin Wall, and the dissolution of the Soviet Union ushered in a period of
increasing global economic integration. This economic optimism resulting from
these developments led to regional organizations that were more open to
participating in multinational trade than those that had formed in the era of old
regionalism. 

After the Cold War, the new political and economic world order was no longer
dominated by competition between two superpowers—the U.S. and the Soviet
Union—but by the existence of multiple powers. In the period of new regionalism,
multi-state agreements were increasingly shaped by non-economic factors such
as environmental and social policy as well as policy to encourage transparency
and accountability in governance. Several scholars have concluded that while new
regionalism was affected by globalization, globalization was similarly shaped by
regionalism. In many cases, the impacts of regionalism have furthered, changed,
or reversed the effects of both globalization and transnationalism. 

Since the failure of the World Trade Organization’s 2001 Doha round of
negotiations, regionalist trade agreements have flourished. The underlying theory
behind regionalism holds that as a region grows more economically integrated, it
will inevitably become more fully politically integrated as well. Established in
1992, the European Union (EU) is an example of a multinational politically and
economically integrated entity that evolved after 40 years of economic
integration within Europe. The EU’s predecessor, the European Community, had
been a purely economic arrangement.

Regional vs. Regionalist 

Regional political parties may or may not be regionalist parties. A regional political
party is any political party, which no matter its objectives and platform may be,
seeks to capture power at the state or regional level while not aspiring to control
the national government. For example, the Aam Aadmi Party (Common Man's
Party) in India is a regional party that has controlled the state government of
Delhi since 2015. In contrast, “regionalist” parties are subsets of regional parties
that strive specifically to gain greater political autonomy or independence within
their regions. 

When, as they often do, regional or their regionalist sub-parties fail to garner
enough public support to win legislative seats or otherwise become politically
powerful, they may seek to become part of a coalition government—a type of
government in which political parties cooperate to form or attempt to form a new
government. Recent prominent examples include Lega Nord (North League), a
regionalist political party in the Piedmont region of Italy, the Sinn Féin party’s
participation in the Northern Ireland Executive since 1999, and the New Flemish
Alliance's participation in the Federal Government of Belgium since 2014. 

Not all regional of regionalist parties seek greater autonomy or federalism—a

system of government under which two levels of government exercise a range of
control over the same geographic area. Examples include most provincial and
territorial parties in Canada, most parties in Northern Ireland, and most of the
nearly 2,700 registered political parties in India. In most cases, these parties seek
to advance the causes of special interests such as environmental protection,
religious freedom, reproductive rights, and government reform.  

Regionalism and Related Concepts 

While regionalism, autonomism, secessionism, nationalism, and sectionalism are

interrelated concepts, they often have different and sometimes opposite
meanings.

Autonomism 

Autonomy is the state of not being under the control of another. Autonomism, as
a political doctrine, supports the acquisition or preservation of the political
autonomy of a nation, region, or group of people. In Canada, for example, the
Quebec autonomism movement is a political belief that the province of Quebec
should seek to gain more political autonomy, without seeking to secede from the
Canadian federation. The Union Nationale was a conservative and nationalist
party that that identified with Quebec autonomism. 

While full autonomy applies to an independent state, some autonomous regions

can have a degree of self-governance greater than that of the rest of the country.
For example, in the USA and Canada, many indigenous people’s nations have
autonomy from both the federal and state governments within their reserved
territories. Sales in indigenous people’s reservations are not subject to the state
or provincial sales tax, and state laws on gambling do not apply on such
reservations. 

Secessionism

Secession occurs when a country, state, or region declare their independence

from the ruling government. Significant examples of secession include the United
States from Great Britain in 1776, the former Soviet republics from the Soviet
Union in 1991, Ireland from the United Kingdom in 1921, and the southern
states of the United States leaving the Union in 1861. States sometimes use the
threat of secession as a means of achieving more limited goals. It is, therefore, a
process that begins when a group officially announces its secession—the U.S.
Declaration of Independence, for example. 
Most countries treat secession as a criminal act that warrants retaliation using
military force. As a result, secession can affect international relationships as well
as the civil peace and national security of the country from which a group
secedes. In rare instances, a government may voluntarily agree to recognize a
seceding state’s independence, especially when other countries support the
secession. However, most countries jealously protect their sovereignty and
consider the involuntary loss of land and wealth unthinkable. 

The laws of most countries punish those who secede or attempt to secede. While
the United States has no specific laws on secession, Chapter 15 of the U.S.
Code identifies treason, rebellion, or insurrection, seditious conspiracy, and
advocating for the overthrow of the government as felonies punishable by several
years in prison and substantial fines. 

Nationalism

Nationalism is a fervent, often obsessive belief that one’s home country is

superior to all other countries. Like autonomy, nationalism aims to ensure the
country’s right to govern itself and to insulate itself from the effects of
international influences. However, when taken to its extremes, nationalism often
gives rise to the popular belief that the superiority of one’s country gives it the
right to dominate other countries, often by the use of military force. During the
19th and early 20th centuries, for example, nationalism was used to
justify imperialism and colonialism across Europe, Asia, and Africa. This sense of
superiority differentiates nationalism from patriotism. While patriotism is
similarly characterized by pride in one’s country and a willingness to defend it,
nationalism extends pride to arrogance and a desire for the use of military
aggression toward other countries and cultures. 

Nationalistic fervor can also lead nations into periods of isolationism. In the late
1930s, for example, popularly supported isolationism in reaction to the horrors of
World War I played a significant role in preventing the United States from
becoming involved in World War II until the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. 

Arising largely as a response to 20th and 21st-century global financial crises,

economic nationalism refers to policies intended to protect a country’s economy
from competition in the global marketplace. Economic nationalism opposes
globalization in favor of the perceived safety of protectionism—the economic
policy of restricting imports from other countries through excessive tariffs on
imported goods, import quotas, and other government regulations. Economic
nationalists also oppose immigration based on the belief that immigrants “steal”
jobs from native citizens. 

Sectionalism

As opposed to the multinational aspect of regionalism, sectionalism is an

extreme, potentially dangerous, devotion to the social, political, and economic
interests of a region over those of the country as a whole. Far above and beyond
simple local pride, sectionalism springs from more deeply held cultural, economic,
or political differences that can if gone unchecked can evolve into secessionism. In
this context, sectionalism is considered the opposite of nationalism. Examples of
sectionalism can be found in several countries, such as the United Kingdom and
Scotland, where various sectionalist-secessionist political parties have existed
since the early 1920s.

Sectionalism has created tensions between several small regions throughout

American history. However, it was the competing views of the institution of
enslavement held by citizens of the Southern and Northern states that ultimately
led to the American Civil War. 

Economic Regionalism 

In contrast to traditional nationalism, economic regionalism describes formal

multinational agreements intended to enable the free flow of goods and services
between countries and to coordinate foreign economic policies in the same
geographic region. Economic regionalism can be viewed as a conscious effort to
manage the opportunities and constraints created by the dramatic increase in
multinational trade arrangements since the end of World War II and especially
since the end of the Cold War.  Examples of economic regionalism include free-
trade agreements, bilateral trade agreements, common markets, and economic
unions. 

In the decades following World War II, several regional economic integration
arrangements were established in Europe, including the European Free Trade
Association in 1960 and the European Community in 1957, which reorganized into
the European Union in 1993. The number and success of such agreements
flourished after the tension of the Cold War had faded. For example, the North
American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and the Association of Southeast Asian
Nations (ASEAN) free-trade area depended on geographic proximity, as well as
relatively homogenous political structures—particularly democracy—and shared
cultural traditions.

Types of economic regionalism can be classified by their levels of integration.

Free-trade areas such as the European Free Trade Association (EFTA), which
eliminates or greatly reduces customs duties between its members, are the most
basic expression of economic regionalism. Custom unions, such as the European
Union (EU), display a higher degree of integration by imposing a common tariff on
nonmember nations. Common markets like the European Economic Area (EEA)
add to these arrangements by allowing the free movement of capital and labor
between member countries. Monetary unions, such as the European Monetary
System, which operated from 1979 to 1999, requires a high degree of political
integration between member nations, strives for total economic integration
through the use of a common currency, a common economic policy, and the
elimination of all tariff and non-tariff trade barriers. 

“Tight” economic regionalism features a high level of institutional integration

achieved through shared rules, and decision-making processes designed to limit
the autonomy of individual member countries. Today’s European Union is
considered an example of tight economic regionalism, having evolved from a free-
trade area to a customs union, a common market, and finally to an economic and
currency union. In contrast, “loose” economic regionalism lacks such formal and
binding institutional arrangements, relying instead on informal consultative
mechanisms and consensus-building. NAFTA, as a full-blown free-trade area that
falls short of being an economic union, falls in a loosely defined category between
tight and loose economic regionalism.

Regional economic arrangements may also be classified according to how they

treat nonmember countries. “Open” arrangements impose no trade limitations,
exclusions, or discrimination against nonmember nations. Unconditional most-
favored-nation status, in compliance with the General Agreement on Tariffs and
Trade (GATT), is a typical feature of open regionalism. In contrast, “closed” forms
of regional economic arrangements impose protectionist measures to limit
nonmembers’ access to the markets of member countries. 
Historically, open regionalism has resulted in global trade liberalization, while
closed regionalism had led to trade wars and sometimes to military conflict. Open
regionalism, however, faces the challenge of balancing or “harmonizing” the
different economic policies of many countries. Since the last decades of the 20th
century, the trend has been toward the further development of institutions that
fostered open and tight economic regionalism.

While economics and politics are similar and complement one another in several
ways, in the context of economic and political regionalism, it is important to note
that they are two contrasting concepts. Economic regionalism strives to create
expanded trade and economic opportunities through cooperation between
countries in the same geographical region. In contrast to the notion of building
new concepts, political regionalism aims to create a union of countries intent on
protecting or strengthening already established shared values.