Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Adopted from:
1)https://www.ecasd.us/getattachment/Northstar-Middle-School/Staff/Rob-Beese/1-1-2-
Introduction_to_Engineering-mg4-(2).ppt
2) https://asankhaya.github.io/ppt/CraftingaSuccessfulEngineeringCareer.ppt
What is Science?
What is Technology?
What is Engineering?
What is Mathematics?
What is STEM?
Scientists Technologists
Investigate our Apply science and
natural world math to designs
STEM
Working together
to solve problems
based on societal
needs and wants
Mathematicians Engineers
Use numbers and symbols Create our
to solve problems designed world
Science vs. Technology
• Scientists investigate our natural world
• Engineers help create the human-designed
world
• Technology (or technologies) denotes the
products and processes created by an
engineer and often used by a scientist
(the “stuff” or “things” we use)
Needs and Wants…
PHYSICAL
PHYSICAL BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGICAL
NEEDS:
NEEDS: NEEDS: NEEDS:
• Basic shelter • Water • Family
• Basic clothing • Food • Friends
• Can you think • Can you think • Can you think of
of more? of more? more?
Needs and Wants…
Engineering uses
scientific, technological, and
mathematical knowledge to
solve practical problems.
Engineers Do Many Things
• Invent – Develop a new product, system, or
process that has never existed before
• Innovate – Improve an existing technological
product, system, or method
Invent
Design Build
Analyze
Orchestrate
Create
Conceive
Improve Evaluate
Engineers Work to Solve Many Kinds
of Problems
• An electrical engineer may design a
GPS system for your vehicle.
• A pharmaceutical/chemical engineer
may find a cure for disease.
• A computer engineer may build a
computer the size of your watch.
• A mechanical engineer may create a
robot to discover water on a planet.
• An agricultural engineer may evaluate the effects
of global warming on food production.
1. Introduction
Most engineering courses involve problem solving, and solving problems requires the
development of several types of knowledge and skills. From course to course, the kinds of
problems that are solved and the specific knowledge and skills required can be very different.
But across a wide range of courses we can define categories of knowledge and skills that are
required for solving most problems. By referring to these categories while teaching, studying and
practicing, we can develop a framework for learning. This framework provides a location and a
structure for storing important knowledge, making it easier to recall.
1. Concepts are the fundamental ideas, laws, principles, theories, hypotheses and models
that form the basis for most of what we understand and do as engineers. By themselves,
they are often not sufficient to solve problems, but they are required to formulate
problems, develop solutions and interpret results.
2. Compass is a guide, or a set of suggested steps, for solving a certain class of problems. It
is not usually a detailed process because the nature of each problem is unique and
requires some creativity in the application of the relevant concepts. A Compass connects
all of the other C’s for a given problem type.
3. Computations include the mathematical skills required to solve a problem (e.g., algebra,
calculus, vector operations) and to present data (e.g., significant digits, units). These are
often thought of as “turn the crank” sorts of operations, but a rich set of tools and a deep
understanding of them is necessary to be a good problem solver.
4. Communication takes many forms, but its purpose is always to tell a story. In the context
of problem solving, communication skills are needed to define the problem, justify the
assumptions, describe the detailed solution steps and interpret the results. Key features
include overall organization and structure, step-wise clarity and flow, diagrams, drawings
and plots.
5. Consistency is instrumental in the development of good problem solving habits, skills and
communication. This refers to, for example, the repeated use of reliable step-by-step
procedures, convenient sign conventions and coordinate systems, meaningful notations
and more. Solving similar problems a different way every time is sometimes possible, but
it’s not very effective in practice or in the early stages of learning.
6. Checks are strategies and methods to validate the accuracy of solutions. The most
relevant approaches to use depend on the type of problem being solved. Examples
include repeating (double-checking) computations, confirming that a final solution
satisfies the boundary conditions, verifying that conservation laws are satisfied and so on.
Note that these are not steps for engineering problem solving. Rather, they are the main
components or ingredients that are required to solve problems. In most problems, many of the
Seven C’s will play a role, though perhaps not all of them at once.
In addition to providing a framework for organizing new knowledge and skills, the structure and
vocabulary of the Seven C’s can be used to identify specific areas of learning strength and
weakness. A general statement such as, “I am not good at solving this type of problem” might be
replaced with a more precise “I don’t understand why this term is zero for this problem”
(Concept) or “I don’t know how to use this information to calculate the temperature” (Compass)
or “I seem to get the wrong sign whenever I take a cross-product” (Computation) and so on.
Then, additional instruction and practice can be targeted where it will help the most.
This sort of diagnosis is aided by listing, for example, the relevant Concepts, Compass steps or
Computations involved in the problem at hand. An inability to do so indicates a lack of
knowledge, understanding or skill related to those items that should be on the list.
When practicing problem solving, identifying the role played by each of the C’s helps to
reinforce both the distinctions and the connections among them. This simple act helps learners to
better appreciate the broad set of skills and knowledge needed to be a good engineer, which in
turn seems to motivate and guide more purposeful study. Further, this reflective activity
increases both understanding and retention.
The Seven C’s were introduced to students in several Mechanics of Materials classes during a
recent multi-year study on assessment methods [1]. Though they were not a formal part of the
study itself, it was observed that the C’s played a key role in student success. (The only C not
emphasized in these classes was Collaboration, though it could have been.) By introducing these
learning categories early and referring to them often, they gradually became part of the
vocabulary both in the class and in office hours. The remarkable improvement of student
performance in the study [1] is largely attributed to the motivation of students to study
differently due to the modified assessment approach. Nevertheless, based on observations and
discussions with students, it is believed that using the structure of the Seven C’s played a role in
helping these motivated students to achieve the desired level of problem solving proficiency.
The objective of the current paper is to describe the Seven C’s and the roles that they play in
problem solving. Suggestions for how to use these learning categories are provided for both
instructors and students.
Concepts
Of all the Seven C’s, this is the one we emphasize the most when teaching. We believe, mostly
because it’s true, that gaining a deep understanding of key concepts is the most important thing
our students can do.
Concepts are the fundamental ideas, laws, principles, theories, hypotheses and models that form
the basis for most of what we understand and do as engineers. They are required to formulate
problems, develop solutions and interpret results.
Concepts are the bricks and the beams used to construct solutions. But how many of our
incoming students could build a decent structure given only a pile of bricks and beams?
To build a structure, they would also need:
In other words, they would need some form of all the Seven C’s to successfully build a structure.
The same is true for solving interesting engineering problems. We should not expect students to
be able to solve these problems based solely on our amazing lectures that cover a few main
concepts. This provides only bricks and beams.
The typical classroom lecture as well as the typical textbook chapter consists mostly of an
introduction to new concepts and the formulation of key equations. Then, based on this
information, homework problems are assigned and examinations are given that require students
to solve problems.
In other words, we tend to teach concepts and then test process.
The homework and test problems are intended to give students practice and test their ability in
applying the new concepts. But much of what they need for successful practice and success on
exams is missing.
For example, we must also clearly demonstrate and provide a guide (a Compass) for how these
concepts connect to solving problems and interpreting real life situations. These connections are
the key to understanding.
Compass
We want our students to be able to use concepts, not just understand them. These are not
necessarily the same thing, even though the best way to demonstrate understanding of a concept
may be to apply it properly in the solution to a problem. This explains why most examinations
involve problem solving.
Further, the more often we successfully apply a concept the better we understand it, especially
when the applications are sufficiently different. So purposeful practice on a variety of problems
not only increases our ability to use concepts, but also deepens our understanding of them [2,3].
It follows that the best way to help our students understand and use concepts is to teach them
how to apply those concepts to a broad set of problems. A Compass plays a large role in this
critical learning activity.
A Compass is a guide, or a set of suggested steps, for solving a certain class of problems. It is not
usually a detailed process because the nature of each problem is unique and requires some
creativity in the application of the relevant concepts. Even more than relating concepts, a
Compass connects all of the other C’s to a solution process for a given type of problem.
Here is an example Compass for drawing a FBD of a beam, truss or frame structure:
1. Create a new drawing of the structure, representing each member as a line.
2. Represent internal connections as either pinned or welded.
3. Define a global coordinate system (GCS) that is convenient for the current problem.
4. Replace all boundary icon symbols with the reaction forces and moments that these
boundary supports impose on the structure.
5. Draw all external loads.
6. Include all key dimensions, including units.
7. Label all points corresponding to boundaries, joints, load discontinuities and key sections.
The word Compass is appropriate here, because its role is to suggest what direction to go next
rather than which detailed steps to take. The details of each step may depend on the particular
problem, and these are left to the problem solver to determine, though a Compass may
recommend a few options.
Rather than limiting creativity, a Compass facilitates it by reducing the mental load associated
with developing an overall solution process. With practice, the solution steps in a Compass
become habitual. This consistency frees the mind to focus on the unique aspects of a problem
that do require some creativity of thought, or to concentrate on performing accurate
computations.
A Compass also provides structure to a solution process that is naturally reflected in the
communication of each worked solution. This makes solutions easier to read, understand and
check for accuracy. Accuracy checks (solution validation methods) should be included in a
Compass.
Note how Concepts, Computations, Communication, Consistency and Checks are all linked
within a Compass. When Collaboration is an integral part of the solution process, it will also be
part of the Compass.
A Compass eliminates many common questions such as, “Where do I start?” Further, by
emphasizing the order and the role of each step in the solution process, it discourages the
skipping of steps, a common reason many students get stuck when trying to solve problems.
Is there concern that students might become overly dependent on a Compass? In the beginning,
this is an acceptable result because we do want to mold behavior and build healthy habits. But in
the long run, observations of student behavior suggest that a Compass is like training wheels on a
bicycle. They enable you to ride without falling when you first get started, but you shed them
quickly when you gain confidence in your own abilities.
Will students just memorize the steps in a Compass? Hopefully they do initially, until those steps
become instinctual. It is preferable for a student to memorize a process for solving a broad set of
problems than to memorize the particular solution to a few selected problems [1].
A Compass can be developed for most, if not all, types of problems in science, engineering and
math. This is truly a key ingredient for successful practice at becoming a skilled problem solver.
Computations
By the time our students start taking mid-level engineering courses, we often take for granted
that they can perform basic mathematical operations and calculations, understand and properly
use significant digits and convert familiar units of measure to express a solution correctly and
completely. This is a risky assumption.
Though students have been exposed to these topics numerous times in high school and
introductory college courses, often their learning has not been assessed in a way that motivates or
requires the expected level of proficiency [1]. Then, when grading is based on a loose notion of
“correct approach” in subsequent engineering courses, there is essentially no penalty for
computational errors. What motivation is there for students to develop a high level of
computational skill?
Being vaguely familiar with the basic ideas is enough to pass many courses under most modern
grading philosophies, and that is precisely the level of capability in many of our students. This is
not apparent until a different assessment approach is implemented [1].
Even worse, students often believe they know “well enough” how to perform these
computations, so there is no need for a higher level of competency or precision. Their high
grades have convinced them that this is true. The result is that both students and instructors
overestimate students’ abilities to perform computational operations.
It seems there is a diminished appreciation for the value of accuracy, the significance of
significant figures, or the magnitude of units. Yet these are essential parts of the practice and the
culture of engineering, and they must become part of the mindset of engineers.
It should not be necessary here to give examples of engineering disasters caused by erroneous
calculations or incorrect units, but a few can be found in [5,6] just in case. When we repeatedly
overlook our students’ mistakes in these areas, we are telling them it is ok to make these errors.
And they are listening.
Moreover, a lack of mastery in computational skills can be a significant barrier to learning more
advanced topics. As described in [2] (p. 15), “Knowledge is foundational: we won’t have the
structures in place to do deep thinking if we haven’t spent time mastering a body of knowledge
related to that thinking.”
When students have not mastered basic computational skills, they have a more difficult time with
new concepts or complex solution processes that involve those skills. This might be because
their mental energy is spent on how to do the computations instead of higher level thought.
When these computations become habitual, the mind is freed to focus on the relevant concepts
and the unique aspects of the problem at hand.
Improving computational skills is mostly a matter of practice, but this practice will be
meaningful only when there is proper motivation. Ideally, the origin of this motivation would be
a deep appreciation for accuracy. For a small number of students, pointing to previous
engineering disasters caused by numerical errors is sufficient to achieve this. But for most
students, the primary motivating factor is the course grade [1].
We must make computational accuracy a key part of the assessment process and an integral part
of the attitude of engineering students.
Ideally, we could influence the grading styles or expectations in prerequisite courses or even in
high school level courses, where many of these computational skills are taught, but it’s difficult
to change things we don’t control. We do control and we can use assessment to maintain an
expected level of performance for our own science and engineering students.
Raising the bar in this way late in a student’s career is sometimes painful, as it reveals
weaknesses that were carefully hidden for a long time. If we are steadfast, then word of these
expectations may eventually trickle down to those courses that support the core science and
engineering curricula.
This discussion on accuracy would not be complete without the concession that no one is perfect
– we all make mistakes. That is true, of course. But the point of that statement is to remind us we
are human when we do make a mistake. It is not an excuse for making errors regularly and
without concern, which is the way it is often interpreted and practiced.
The expectation is not perfection, but rather the demonstrated ability to achieve correct solutions
and the deep-seated belief that correctness matters.
Communication
When engineers think about communication, we mainly think about writing various types of
reports and making presentations. With a little more thought, we can expand the list to include
writing emails and memos, specifications and codes, operating procedures, proposals and other
documents. There are many forms of graphics communications, including charts, diagrams,
assembly drawings and more. And what about listening, which is at least one-half of
communication?
Every story has a beginning that sets the scene and introduces the main characters and the major
conflicts (problem definition); a middle that explores the main themes through the actions of the
characters (application of concepts via the solution steps and assumptions); and an ending that
brings resolution to the story (final results, including their interpretation and validation).
In addition to the overall organization and structure of the story, the detailed pieces of
information within each part must be organized and related to one another through a logical flow.
Random bits of information written in arbitrary locations and orientations on a page do not create
a coherent story, even if there are a few crisscrossing arrows drawn between the parts.
Early in their engineering education career, most students try to arrive at the final answer to a
problem as quickly as possible, and with as few steps and written details as possible. It’s as
though they believe only the final answer matters, and the random scribblings leading up to that
result are a waste of time and pencil lead. (Of course, when they don’t arrive at a correct answer
they do expect partial credit for those sparse and haphazard scribblings.)
Equations are commonly written without labels and values are written without units. As a simple
example, a student’s work may take the form:
500 – R + 200 = 0
R = 700
This may be a perfectly good equation for the problem at hand, but it has no context. A few
descriptors help this equation make sense to others who might read the work:
Equilibrium:
0
500 – Rx + 200 = 0
Rx = 700 N
The concept being used here is Equilibrium, so let’s say that. In particular, the sum of all forces
acting in the x-direction must sum to zero, and we will assume that positive forces act toward the
right. Let’s specify those little details, too. Now, the equation: 500 – Rx + 200 = 0 has meaning.
Note that adding a subscript to R implies that the force Rx acts in the x-direction. That’s helpful
information. Further, Rx = 700 is incomplete without units. 700 N (Newtons) is quite different
than 700 kN (kilo-Newtons) or 700 lbs (pounds).
Using a consistent vocabulary of labels, notation and sign conventions helps to make
communications clearer, while reducing the amount of thought given to these matters.
Of course, the above solution still lacks context without a properly drawn free body diagram
(FBD), which is a graphical representation of the equilibrium state and must precede the writing
of any equilibrium equation. After adding a brief problem statement and a FBD, we now have a
complete short story, or perhaps a chapter of a longer story (a multi-part problem).
The above communication thoughts do not come naturally to engineering students. They must be
taught and enforced until they become instinctual. Though painful at first, somewhere along that
process most students begin to realize the importance of clear communication, and their problem
solving process is better for it.
A well-structured solution suggests that a student has developed a knowledge framework for
organizing the pieces of knowledge used in the solution. This is true even if that structure is
mimicked from instructor solutions to similar problems. In fact, this mimicking is often the best
way for students to learn how to establish a solution structure and a line by line format. Ideally,
this structure would follow an established Compass, as described above.
In the study performed in [1], section A of a mechanics course used a traditional style of
assessment and did not emphasize a Compass or Communication conventions, while sections B
and C of the same course used a modified assessment approach that emphasized accuracy and
that was supported by a detailed Compass and consistent Communication protocols during all
problem solving. At the end of the semester, a common final exam was administered across all
three sections, and this exam was graded by the team of three instructors. Not only did sections B
and C demonstrate significantly greater problem solving abilities than section A, but also it was
observed that student solutions in Sections B and C had become very orderly and followed a
logical flow. This made grading easier and made it easy to locate where a student’s thinking was
fuzzy. The instructors believed that the consistent use of the Compass and the suggested
Communication conventions for instructor solutions to practice problems was mimicked by
students trying to organize their own thoughts. It is not known whether clearer communication
aided in problem solving or greater problem solving skills gave rise to clearer communication of
solutions. But after three years of consistent trends, the instructors in the study believe there is
some connection between these two factors.
Consistency
Companies establish processes and best practices to reduce errors, increase efficiency, align
efforts and produce expected results, consistently. These same outcomes should be expected
from our solution procedures, and they are enhanced by using consistent processes and
communications.
Thus, instructors should faithfully follow a Compass as well as a set of Communication rules in
the solution process for every example, homework and exam problem. Skipping a few steps or
using a “short-hand” notation is tempting when in a hurry, and it might even seem justified in
some problems. But students don’t yet understand when it is ok, if indeed it ever is.
Studies have established that good habits are a strong determiner of overall success, while the
opposite result is more common for those with bad habits (e.g., [7]). The current author has
observed similar trends in engineering students and even in practicing engineers – that building
consistent processes and a proper mindset for solving engineering problems leads to greater
success in problem solving. This does not seem surprising, yet we tend not to emphasize this
topic enough in our courses.
Checks
Checks refers to validation of solution results. The letter “v” may rhyme with “c”, but the title of
this paper is the Seven C’s, so we must lead with the word “checks.”
Many students are aware that validation of results is a critical part of the engineering process, but
their knowledge and skills are not yet mature enough to invent ways to check their own results. If
this is something that students are expected to do, then, as with most of the skills discussed
herein, instructors must explicitly describe and illustrate the use of various ways to validate
solutions. These techniques only seem obvious after they have been learned and practiced.
A common misconception among students is that there is no value in obtaining correct answers
on exam questions. This attitude is reinforced by grading models that award generous partial
credit based on a poorly defined concept of “correct approach.” This creates a culture in which
many students no longer feel the need to solve problems completely or correctly [1].
Many students also discount the value of getting correct answers because in the “real world”
someone else will be checking their results. This faulty logic ignores the facts that they may also
be asked to check the work of other engineers, and this checking process assumes that everyone
involved has a deep understanding of the relevant concepts and the detailed solution method for
the problem at hand. Otherwise, fundamental errors may go unnoticed, leading to potential
disaster. No one with only a cursory knowledge of a problem can reliably solve it or check
someone else’s solution.
A deep understanding of concepts and solution processes is unlikely in the absence of a desire to
obtain correct solutions. One of the few ways, if not the only way, to encourage students to strive
for accuracy is to link the course grade to complete and correct solutions [1].
The author and his colleagues implemented an exam grading scheme that requires students to
find their own mistakes and correct them in order to receive any partial credit for an incorrect
solution [1]. Even then, partial credit was only awarded for very minor errors, not for conceptual
misunderstandings, in order to motivate complete and correct solutions.
Locating, classifying and correcting errors on exams can be a very important part of the learning
process. This is referred to as reflection by cognitive scientists [3]. Developing these skills may
lead to higher accuracy as well as higher grades in the future, all while developing an
engineering mindset for checking work and locating mistakes.
Collaboration
Teamwork best practices are relevant to any group activity, including group problem solving.
This means that teamwork skills can be strengthened even within applied mathematics and
engineering science courses.
For example, group practice exams are a great way to cause a small group of students to work
toward a common goal, such as preparing for an upcoming exam. Assigning a small amount of
course credit to this activity will encourage participation. A frequent outcome of group practice
exams is the natural establishment of study groups, another opportunity to practice teamwork
skills.
Students can use the Seven C’s to enhance their learning and practice. Here are a few tips.
Concepts. Before you start solving a practice problem, list the concepts that will be involved in
the solution. Review this list (reflect) after solving the problem and make corrections, as needed.
Compass. If a compass or solution guide is not provided for you, develop one and use it for all
practice problems. Update it when you find limitations or inconsistencies.
Computations. Practice key skills until you can perform them without much thought. Then you
can focus more on the other aspects of a problem.
Communication. Develop an organized and clear way to communicate all solutions. Include all
details, and don’t skip steps. To assess how clear your work is, ask others to read your solutions
and explain them to you.
Consistency. Develop best practices in your solution processes and communication, and don’t
vary from them. Be boring here and save the creativity for when it is actually useful.
Checks. A method used to check a solution should be different from the original method used.
For example, calculate the components of a moment using the right-hand rule, then check them
with the mathematical version (cross-product approach). Perform calculations on your calculator
in a different order to check your original work. Or type calculations on your calculator using
your right hand, then do it again using your left hand.
Collaboration. Take a leadership role in a club or in your study group. Try to use a few of the
teamwork skills you have learned. Practicing team skills is a great way to improve a few of those
talents that employers are looking for.
4. Conclusions
There are seven key ingredients to problem solving – Concepts, Compass, Computations,
Communication, Consistency, Checks and Collaboration. These categories provide a vocabulary
for discussing solution techniques and a mental framework for better understanding and using
knowledge in problem solving. Recent studies suggest that emphasizing the Seven C’s in a
mechanics class played a role in helping motivated students to significantly improve their
problem solving abilities. While it is common in some classes to place greater emphasis on
Concepts, it is recommended that some emphasis be given to all of the Seven C’s within problem
solving courses.
5. References
[1] Ronald C. Averill, Sara Roccabianca and Geoffrey Recktenwald, “A Multi-Instructor Study
of Assessment Techniques in Engineering Mechanics Courses,” ASEE Annual Conference &
Exposition, Tampa, Florida, June 16-19, 2019.
[2] James M. Lang, Small Teaching: Everyday Lessons from the Science of Teaching, San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2016.
[3] Peter C. Brown, Henry L. Roediger III and Mark A. McDaniel, Make It Stick: The Science
of Successful Learning, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2014.
[4] http://newleafedu.com/resources/
[5] https://cs.fit.edu/~ryan/library/Some_disasters_attributable_to_Numerical_Analysis.pdf
[6] http://mentalfloss.com/article/25845/quick-6-six-unit-conversion-disasters
[7] Tom Corley, Change Your Habits, Change Your Life: Strategies that Transformed 177
Average People into Self-Made Millionaires, North Loop Books, 2016.
Scientific Writing
FENG 102
Assoc.Prof.Dr. Görkem Üçtuğ
Week 3
Why learn scientific writing?
• You will have to write a master thesis
• You may want to write a scientific article
• You will be judged by what you write and
what you present
– Content
– Structure
– Style
Writing is learned by writing
• Practice, practice, practice
• Choose good role models
• Study good examples
• But there are also techniques and rules
to learn
How well you communicate affects the
well-being of others
Reports Conferences
Articles Lectures
Proposals Meetings
Web Pages Posters
specific general
technical technical non-technical
audiences audiences audiences
Scientific writing differs from other kinds of writing
audience
occasion
purpose
[Franklin,
1952]
To inform
To persuade
[Peterson, 1987]
You should begin the writing process by analyzing
your constraints
Who they are
What they know
Audience
Why they will read
How they will read
Format
Formality
Occasion Politics and ethics
Process and deadline
To inform
Purpose To persuade
Three aspects of writing affect the way that
readers assess your documents
Content
Style
Form
Style is the way you communicate the
content to the audience
[Peterson, 1987]
words
wordswords
Illustration wordswordswords
wordswordswordswords
wordswordswords
wordswordswords
wordswordswords
wordswordswords
Structure Language
style
Form embodies the format and mechanics
of the writing
mechanics
format
grammar
typography
usage
layout
punctuation
spelling
We can split the writing process into stages
Middle
Beginning
The organization of a scientific document can be viewed
as a beginning, middle, and ending
Conclusions
Back Matter
Ending
Middle Sections
Middle
Title
Summary
Introduction Beginning
Beginnings prepare readers
for understanding the work
Summary
Technical Informative
Abstract Abstract
Abstract
Descriptive Executive
Abstract Summary
Although several names exist for summaries,
there are essentially two approaches
Topic?
Importance?
Background?
Arrangement?
Introduction
The introduction defines the scope
and limitations of the work
Proposed Study
on Effects of Alcohol
on Life Expectancy
Ten-year study
Three classes of drinkers:
non-drinkers
moderate drinkers
heavy drinkers
Men surveyed
Other effects,
such as exercise,
not considered
limitations
A strong introduction tells readers
why the research is important
Heading
Subheading
Subheading
Heading
Subheading
Subheading
Subheading
Heading
[Sandia, 1985]
Common strategies exist
for the middles of scientific reports
Chronological
[Maizels, 2001]
Spatial
Parallel
Parts
Corel Corporation
Flow
[Sandia, 1985]
Section headings should be descriptive and parallel
Non-Parallel Parallel
Non-Descriptive Descriptive
Introduction Introduction
Background
Marx Generators Past Designs for Particle Beam Fusion
Line Pulse
Beam Generation New Design for Particle Beam Fusion
Transporting Beam Charging Marx Generators
Pellets Forming Line Pulse
Results Generating Particle Beam
Conclusions Transporting Particle Beam
Irradiating Deuterium-Tritium Pellets
Results of New Design
Conclusions and Recommendations
When you divide a section into subsections,
all the pieces should be of the same pie
New
New Design
Design for
for Particle
Particle Beam
Beam Fusion
Fusion
Charging
Charging Marx
Marx Generators
Generators
Generating
Generating Particle
Particle Beam
Beam
Irradiating
Pellets Deuterium-Tritium Pellets
Organization is hidden when headings occur in a
long list without secondary headings
Performance of Performance of
the Solar One Receiver the Solar One Receiver
Introduction Introduction
Steady State Efficiency Receiver’s Efficiency
Average Efficiency Steady State Efficiency
Start-Up Time Average Efficiency
Operation Time Receiver’s Operation Cycle
Operation During Cloud Transients Start-Up Time
Panel Mechanical Supports Operation Time
Tube Leaks Operation During Cloud Transients
Conclusion Receiver’s Mechanical Wear
Panel Mechanical Supports
Tube Leaks
Conclusion
Many journal articles follow a set organization
named IMRaD
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Discussion
Results
In a strong ending, you analyze results
and give a future perspective
Conclusions
Analysis of Results Analyze results from
overall perspective
Future Perspective
Several options:
Make recommendations
Discuss future work
Repeat limitations
Use appendices to supply background
for secondary audiences
Appendix A
Concern About the Greenhouse Effect
Appendix B
Project Stormfury
Glossary
cleaned
exhaust
air
inlet
typography
layout
Each typestyle has its own personality and power
TYPE IS TO READ
Type is to read
48 point posters
36 point
presentation slides
24 point
18 point
titles
14 point
12 point
10 point
text
8 point
footnotes
In your layouts, use white space for association,
emphasis, and hierarchy
space for
headings
space
for
margins
space for
illustrations
Follow the format that is expected or required
for the situation
LITERATURE REVIEW
FENG 102
Week 4
Assoc.Prof.Dr. Görkem Üçtuğ
4
Why write LR?
Literature reviews provide you with a handy
guide to a particular topic. If you have
limited time to conduct research, literature
reviews can give you an overview or act as
a stepping stone.
Literature reviews also provide a solid
background for a research paper's
investigation. Comprehensive knowledge of
the literature of the field is essential to most
research papers.
5
Why write LR?
For professionals, they are useful
reports that keep them up to date
with what is current in the field.
For scholars, the depth and breadth of
the literature review emphasizes the
credibility of the writer in his or her
field
6
Why write LR?
The purpose of a literature review is for you
to take a critical look at the literature (facts
and views) that already exists in the area
you are researching.
A literature review is not a shopping list of
everything that exists, but a critical analysis
that shows an evaluation of the existing
literature and a relationship between the
different works.
It demonstrates the relevance of the
research.
7
Why write LR?
In the context of a research paper on a
thesis, the literature review provides a
background to the study being proposed.
The background may consider one or more
of the following aspects depending on the
research question being posed:
Theoretical background – past, present or future
Industrial practice – previous or contemporary
Methodology and/or research methods
Previous findings
Rationale and/or relevance of the current study
8
Why write LR?
In a broader context Hart (1998) lists the
following purposes of a review:
Distinguishing what has been done from what
needs to be done;
Discovering important variables relevant to the
topic;
Synthesising and gaining a new perspective;
Identifying relationships between ideas and
practice;
Establishing the context of the topic or problem;
9
Why write LR?
Rationalising the significance of the problem;
Enhancing and acquiring the subject
vocabulary;
Understanding the structure of the subject;
Relating ideas and theory to applications;
Identifying methodologies and techniques
that have been used;
Placing the research in a historical context to
show familiarity with state-of-the-art
developments.
10
What should I do before writing the
literature review?
Clarify
If your assignment is not very specific, seek
clarification from your supervisor/lecturer:
Roughly how many sources should you include?
What types of sources (books, journal articles,
websites)?
Should you summarize, synthesize, or critique
your sources by discussing a common theme or
issue?
Should you evaluate your sources?
Should you provide subheadings and other
background information, such as definitions and/
or a history?
11
What should I do before writing the
literature review?
Find models
Look for other literature reviews in your area of
interest or in the discipline and read them to get
a sense of the types of themes you might want
to look for in your own research or ways to
organize your final review. You can simply put
the word "review" in your search engine along
with your other topic terms to find articles of this
type on the Internet or in an electronic database.
The bibliography or reference section of sources
you've already read are also excellent entry
points into your own research.
12
What should I do before writing the
literature review?
Narrow your topic
There are hundreds or even thousands of
articles and books on most areas of
study. The narrower your topic, the easier
it will be to limit the number of sources
you need to read in order to get a good
survey of the material. Your instructor
will probably not expect you to read
everything that's out there on the topic,
but you'll make your job easier if you first
limit your scope.
13
What should I do before writing the
literature review?
Consider whether your sources
are current
Some disciplines require that you use
information that is as current as possible.
In the sciences, for instance, treatments
for medical problems are constantly
changing according to the latest studies.
Information even two years old could be
obsolete.
14
What should I do before writing the
literature review?
Find a focus
A literature review, like a term paper, is
usually organized around ideas, not the
sources themselves as an annotated
bibliography would be organized. This
means that you will not just simply list
your sources and go into detail about
each one of them, one at a time.
15
What should I do before writing the
literature review?
Construct a working thesis
statement
Then use the focus you've found to
construct a thesis statement. Yes!
Literature reviews have thesis statements
as well! However, your thesis statement
will not necessarily argue for a position or
an opinion; rather it will argue for a
particular perspective on the material.
16
What should I do before writing the
literature review?
Consider organization
You've got a focus, and you've narrowed
it down to a thesis statement.
Now what is the most effective way of
presenting the information?
What are the most important topics,
subtopics, etc., that your review needs to
include?
And in what order should you present
them?
17
What should I do before writing the
literature review?
Develop an organization for your review at
both a global and local level:
First, cover the basic categories
Just like most academic papers, literature
reviews also must contain at least three basic
elements: an introduction or background
information section; the body of the review
containing the discussion of sources; and, finally,
a conclusion and/or recommendations section to
end the paper.
18
What should I do before writing the
literature review?
Introduction: Gives a quick idea of the topic
of the literature review, such as the central
theme or organizational pattern.
Body: Contains your discussion of sources
and is organized either chronologically,
thematically, or methodologically (see below
for more information on each).
Conclusions/Recommendations: Discuss
what you have drawn from reviewing
literature so far. Where might the discussion
proceed?
19
What should I do before writing the
literature review?
The introduction should provide the reader with the
scale and structure of your review. It serves as a kind
of map.
The body of the review depends on how you have
organised your key points. Literature reviews at
postgraduate level should be evaluative and not
merely descriptive. For example possible reasons for
similarities or differences between studies are
considered rather than a mere identification of them.
The conclusion of the review needs to sum up the
main findings of your research into the literature. The
findings can be related to the aims of the study you
are proposing to do. The reader is thus provided with a
coherent background to the current study.
20
What should I do before writing the
literature review?
Organizing the body
Once you have the basic categories in place, then you
must consider how you will present the sources
themselves within the body of your paper. Create an
organizational method to focus this section even
further.
To help you come up with an overall organizational
framework for your review, consider the six typical
ways of organizing the sources into a review:
Chronological
By publication
By trend
Thematic
Methodological
Questions for Further Research
21
What should you write?
Layout
Make your literature review have an academic and
professional appearance. Here are some points to
make the look of your report appealing to the reader
White space: leave space between sections,
especially from the abstract. This gives an uncluttered
effect.
Headings/sub-headings: these help to separate
ideas.
Text boxes: you can use these for quotations or
paraphrasing to separate them from the rest of your
text. It is also pleasing to the eye.
22
What should you write?
Graphics: centre your graphics, such as
diagrams or tables, to have space around
them. Try not to bury graphics in your text.
Pagination: you can number pages or
sections or both, but the important thing to
do is to be consistent. The cover page
normally is not numbered. The content page
and abstract page usually have a separate
numbering system to the body of your
literature review.
23
What should you write?
Language focus
Create a balance between direct quotation
(citation) and paraphrasing. Avoid too much
direct quoting. The verb tense chosen depends
on your emphasis:
When you are citing a specific author's findings,
use the past tense: (found, demonstrated);
When you are writing about an accepted fact,
use the present tense: (demonstrates, finds);
and
When you are citing several authors or making a
general statement, use the present perfect
tense: (have shown, have found, little research
has been done).
24
What should you write?
Final checklist
Have I fulfilled the purpose of the literature review?
Is it written at a level appropriate to its audience?
Are its facts correct?
Is all the information included relevant?
Are the layout and presentation easy on the eye?
Is the language clear, concise and academic?
Does the abstract summarise the entire review?
Does the introduction adequately introduce the topic?
Is the body organised logically?
Does the conclusion interpret, analyse and evaluate?
Are the recommendations reasonable?
Does the table of contents correspond with the actual contents? Are
page numbers correct?
Have I acknowledged all sources of information through correct
referencing?
Have I checked spelling, grammar and punctuation?
Have I carefully proof-read the final draft?
25
How to review?
The whole process of reviewing
includes:
a. Searching for literature
b. Sorting and prioritising the retrieved
literature
c. Analytical reading of papers
d. Evaluative reading of papers
e. Comparison across studies
f. Organising the content
g. Writing the review
26
How to review?
Comparison across studies
The aim is to extract key points by comparing
and contrasting ACROSS studies, instead of
reading one paper after another.
Key points for a review may concern areas of
similarities and/or differences in:
Research aim(s) or hypotheses
Research design and sampling
Instruments and procedures used
How data were analysed
Results or findings
Interpretations
27
How to review?
Tips on writing
Express one idea in a sentence. Ensure that all your sentences have
Sentences
a subject, verb and object.
Group sentences that express and develop one aspect of your topic.
Paragraphs
Use a new paragraph for another aspect or another topic.
Use words that link paragraphs and which show contrast and
Transition Words development to your argument e.g. ‘hence’, ‘therefore’, ‘but’,
‘thus’, ‘as a result’, ‘in contrast’.
28
How to review?
□ Pitfalls
- Vagueness due to too much or
inappropriate generalisations
- Limited range
- Insufficient information
- Irrelevant material
- Omission of contrasting view
- Omission of recent work
29
Example
Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) are statistical tools that have
been used successfully in modelling difficult tasks such as
speech recognition [15] or biological sequence analysis [16].
Inspired by a similar speech application, Hidden Markov
model (HMM) has also been applied to activity recognition.
The first approach for the human movements based on
HMMs was described in [13]. It distinguished between six
different tennis strokes. This system divided the image into
meshes and counted the number of pixels representing the
person for each mesh. The numbers were composed to a
feature vector that was converted into a discrete label by a
vector quantizer. The labels were classified based on discrete
HMMs. In [8], an HMM is used as a representation of simple
actions which are recognized by computing the probability
that the model produces the visual observation sequence. In
[14] layered HMMs were proposed to model single person
office activities at various time granularities
30
ENGINEERING PROJECTS
Better definition
“A sequence of connected and related activities (requirement engineering, system engineering, implementation,
testing, documentation, controlling, managing…) that must be completed by a specific time, within budget, and
according to specification.”
Project Features
▪ A project has a definite beginning and definite end
▪ The duration of a project is finite
▪ The opportunity or market window is usually temporary, most projects have a limited time
frame in which to produce the product or service
▪ The project team - as a team - seldom outlives the project. Most projects are performed by a
team created for the sole purpose of performing the project
▪ A project occurs step by step to define the product or service, in a so called “progressive
elaboration” process.
The Project Life Cycle
…The Project Life Cycle
The project manager and project team have one shared goal: to carry out the work of the project
for the purpose of meeting the project’s objectives. Every project has a beginning, a middle
period during which activities move the project toward completion, and an ending (either
successful or unsuccessful). A standard project typically has the following four major phases
(each with its own agenda of tasks and issues): initiation, planning, implementation, and closure.
Taken together, these phases represent the path a project takes from the beginning to its end and
are generally referred to as the project “life cycle.”
…The Project Life Cycle
Initiation Phase
During the first of these phases, the initiation phase, the project objective or need is identified;
this can be a business problem or opportunity. An appropriate response to the need is
documented in a business case with recommended solution options. A feasibility study is
conducted to investigate whether each option addresses the project objective and a final
recommended solution is determined. Issues of feasibility (“can we do the project?”) and
justification (“should we do the project?”) are addressed.
Once the recommended solution is approved, a project is initiated to deliver the approved
solution and a project manager is appointed. The major deliverables and the participating work
groups are identified, and the project team begins to take shape. Approval is then sought by the
project manager to move onto the detailed planning phase.
…The Project Life Cycle
Planning Phase
The next phase, the planning phase, is where the project solution is further developed in as much detail as possible and the steps
necessary to meet the project’s objective are planned. In this step, the team identifies all of the work to be done. The project’s
tasks and resource requirements are identified, along with the strategy for producing them. This is also referred to as “scope
management.” A project plan is created outlining the activities, tasks, dependencies, and timeframes. The project manager
coordinates the preparation of a project budget by providing cost estimates for the labour, equipment, and materials costs. The
budget is used to monitor and control cost expenditures during project implementation.
Once the project team has identified the work, prepared the schedule, and estimated the costs, the three fundamental
components of the planning process are complete. This is an excellent time to identify and try to deal with anything that might
pose a threat to the successful completion of the project. This is called risk management. In risk management, “high-threat”
potential problems are identified along with the action that is to be taken on each high-threat potential problem, either to
reduce the probability that the problem will occur or to reduce the impact on the project if it does occur. This is also a good time
to identify all project stakeholders and establish a communication plan describing the information needed and the delivery
method to be used to keep the stakeholders informed.
Finally, you will want to document a quality plan, providing quality targets, assurance, and control measures, along with an
acceptance plan, listing the criteria to be met to gain customer acceptance. At this point, the project would have been planned in
detail and is ready to be executed.
…The Project Life Cycle
Execution (Implementation) Phase
During the third phase, the implementation phase, the project plan is put into motion and the work of the project is
performed. It is important to maintain control and communicate as needed during implementation. Progress is
continuously monitored and appropriate adjustments are made and recorded as variances from the original plan. In
any project, a project manager spends most of the time in this step. During project implementation, people are
carrying out the tasks, and progress information is being reported through regular team meetings. The project
manager uses this information to maintain control over the direction of the project by comparing the progress
reports with the project plan to measure the performance of the project activities and take corrective action as
needed. The first course of action should always be to bring the project back on course (i.e., to return it to the
original plan). If that cannot happen, the team should record variations from the original plan and record and
publish modifications to the plan. Throughout this step, project sponsors and other key stakeholders should be kept
informed of the project’s status according to the agreed-on frequency and format of communication. The plan
should be updated and published on a regular basis.
Status reports should always emphasize the anticipated end point in terms of cost, schedule, and quality of
deliverables. Each project deliverable produced should be reviewed for quality and measured against the
acceptance criteria. Once all of the deliverables have been produced and the customer has accepted the final
solution, the project is ready for closure.
…The Project Life Cycle
Closing Phase
During the final closure, or completion phase, the emphasis is on releasing the final deliverables
to the customer, handing over project documentation to the business, terminating supplier
contracts, releasing project resources, and communicating the closure of the project to all
stakeholders. The last remaining step is to conduct lessons-learned studies to examine what
went well and what didn’t. Through this type of analysis, the wisdom of experience is
transferred back to the project organization, which will help future project teams.
…The Project Life Cycle
Monitoring and Control
Monitoring and control are sometimes combined with execution because they often occur at the
same time. As teams execute their project plan, they must constantly monitor their own
progress.
To guarantee delivery of what was promised, teams must monitor tasks to prevent scope creep,
calculate key performance indicators and track variations from allotted cost and time. This
constant vigilance helps keep the project moving ahead smoothly.
What is project management
methodology?
A project management methodology is essentially a set of guiding principles and processes for
managing a project. Your choice of methodology defines how you work and communicate.
Popular project management
methologies: Waterfall
▪ The Waterfall methodology is sequential. It is
also heavily requirements-focused. You need to
have a crystal clear idea of what the project
demands before proceeding further. There is no
scope for correction once the project is
underway.
▪ The Waterfall method is divided into discrete
stages. You start by collecting and analyzing
requirements, designing the solution (and your
approach), implementing the solution and fixing
issues, if any.
▪ Each stage in this process is self-contained;
you wrap up one stage before moving onto
another.
Popular project management
methologies: Agile
▪ In approach and ideology, Agile is the opposite of
the Waterfall method. As the name implies, this
method favors a fast and flexible approach. There is
no top-heavy requirements-gathering. Rather, it is
iterative with small incremental changes that
respond to changing requirements.
▪ Flexibility and freedom: Since there are no fixed
stages or focus on requirements, it gives your
resources much more freedom to experiment and
make incremental changes. This makes it
particularly well-suited for creative projects.
▪ Lower risk: With Agile management, you get
regular feedback from stakeholders and make
changes accordingly. This drastically reduces the
risk of project failure since the stakeholders are
involved at every step.
Project quality management
Quality Planning
▪ Identifying which quality standards are relevant to the project and determining how to satisfy them.
who decides?
who is responsible on?
who controls?
who takes benefits of?
P = Participant
A = Accountable
R = Review required
I = Input required
S = Sign-off Required
What is risk ?
▪ Project risk is an uncertain event or condition, that, if it occurs, has a positive or a negative
effect on a project objective (cost, time, quality).
▪ A risk has a cause and, if it occurs, a consequence.
▪ In risk management, probability and impact (severity) of the risks are considered.
FEASIBILITY STUDY
Excerpt from:Stephane Dion's Clean Air Plan rips off a David Suzuki Foundation report – Steve Janke, Sept. 4,
2008 (Angry in the Great White North blog)
http://stevejanke.com/archives/195299.php
Quick quiz
You have committed plagiarism if you:
Source: http://
www.academicintegrity.uoguelph.ca/
Quick quiz
You have committed plagiarism if you:
Source: http://
www.academicintegrity.uoguelph.ca/
Plagiarism is…
Source: http://
www.academicintegrity.uoguelph.ca/
Plagiarism is…
Source: http://
www.academicintegrity.uoguelph.ca/
Examples
◦ using direct, verbatim quotations*, paraphrased material,
algorithms, formulae, scientific or mathematical
concepts, or ideas without appropriate acknowledgment
in any academic assignment;
◦ submission of a take-home examination, essay, laboratory
report or other assignment written, in whole or in part, by
someone else;
◦ using another’s data or research findings;
◦ buying or selling term papers or assignments;
◦ submitting a computer program developed in whole or in
part by someone else
Source: http://www.academicintegrity.uoguelph.ca/
To avoid plagiarizing…
Yes. Great minds think alike, but even if you did think of the idea
on your own you still need to reference the published source.
Otherwise, readers will accuse you of plagiarism. You can use
this source to support your argument, and you can try to show
how your idea differs from the other author’s, but you still
have to cite the other source.
No. If you come up with an idea on your own, you don’t have to
cite the other source.
Source: http://
www.academicintegrity.uoguelph.ca/
Quick quiz
Yes. Great minds think alike, but even if you did think of
the idea on your own you still need to reference the
published source. Otherwise, readers will accuse you of
plagiarism. You can use this source to support your
argument, and you can try to show how your idea differs
from the other author’s, but you still have to cite the
other source.
Source: http://
www.academicintegrity.uoguelph.ca/
When in doubt… CITE!
Just how often do academics cite?
Particularly in the introduction of
journal articles, you’ll often notice
that authors cite very frequently. In
the example above, the author is
laying out the current state of
research before establishing the
gap which his or her research will
attempt to fill.
Sample journal article
The informational and entertainment capabilities of the Web have
increasingly been recognized,both as an advertising medium (Day, Shyi, &
Wang, 2006) and as part of an integrated marketing communication (IMC)
program (Belch & Belch, 2007). Recent research has uncovered synergies
between TV and Web advertising (Chang & Thorson, 2004), explored the
extent of interactivity in Western versus Eastern corporate Web sites (Cho &
Cheon, 2005),and examined the relationship between interactive functions
and Web site rankings (Tse & Chan, 2004). Although these investigations
have greatly enhanced our understanding of how to effectively utilize the
Web as a marketing communications tool,these studies have focused
primarily on adults (e.g.,Geissler , Zinkhan, & Watson, 2006; Jiang, Jones, &
Javie, 2008; Park, Lennon,& Stoel, 2005). Our understanding of how to
customize this medium to more effectively reach children, in contrast, is
limited. Considering that children influence over $600 billion of annual U.S.
household purchases (Piperato, 2005) and represent a substantial and
rapidly growing segment of Internet users, it is imperative to gain a better
understanding of the factors that influence their ability to navigate Web
sites and process information.
Rose, M., Rose, G., Blodgett, J.G. (2009).The effects of interface design and
age on children's information processing of Web sites. [Electronic version].
Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 26(1): 1–21.
Can you detect plagiarism?
There's a new class of worker out there: Nearly Autonomous, Not in the Office,
doing Business in their Own Time Staff. Or nanobots, for short. Empowered by
their mobile devices and remote access to the corporate network, nanobots
put in long hours, sometimes seven days a week -- just not at their desks.
Different from mobile workers, who usually stay in close contact with
managers, nanobots thrive on their driven natures and on the personal
freedom with which they are entrusted. Found at many levels of an
organization, from sales managers to senior executives, they are self-starting
high achievers who produce strong results with a minimum of supervision.
Allowed to find their own equilibrium between work and private lives, they
tend to put work first.
Pauleen, D. & Harmer, B. (2008, Dec. 15). Away from the desk...always. Wall Street
Journal Digital Network. Retrieved Dec. 22, 2008, from http://online.wsj.com/article/
SB122911032462702387.html
Is this plagiarism? Compare the original to the paraphrase
Original:
There's a new class of worker out there: Nearly Autonomous, Not in the Office, doing Business in
their Own Time Staff. Or nanobots, for short. Empowered by their mobile devices and remote
access to the corporate network, nanobots put in long hours, sometimes seven days a week -- just
not at their desks. Different from mobile workers, who usually stay in close contact with managers,
nanobots thrive on their driven natures and on the personal freedom with which they are entrusted.
Found at many levels of an organization, from sales managers to senior executives, they are self-
starting high achievers who produce strong results with a minimum of supervision. Allowed to find
their own equilibrium between work and private lives, they tend to put work first.
Paraphrase #1:
Did you know there’s a new class of worker out there? Nearly Autonomous, Not
in the Office, doing Business in their Own Time Staff—or, more simply, nanobots
(Pauleen and Harmer, 2008). Empowered by their mobile devices and remote
access to the company network, nanobots put in long hours, sometimes seven
days a week -- just not at their desks. Unlike mobile workers, who usually stay
in close contact with managers, “nanobots thrive on their driven natures and on
the personal freedom with which they are entrusted,” (2008, par.2).
Interestingly, they are high achievers who are self-motivated and produce good
results with little supervision. They are found at many levels of an organization,
from sales managers to senior executives. Allowed to find their own balance
between work and personal lives, they usually put work first (2008).
Pauleen, D. & Harmer, B. (2008, Dec. 15). Away from the desk...always. Wall Street
Journal Digital Network. Retrieved Dec. 22, 2008, from http://online.wsj.com/article/
SB122911032462702387.html
Verdict: Plagiarism
Paraphrase #1:
Did you know there’s a new class of worker out there? Nearly Autonomous, Not
in the Office, doing Business in their Own Time Staff—or, more simply, nanobots
(Pauleen and Harmer, 2008). Empowered by their mobile devices and remote
access to the company network, nanobots put in long hours, sometimes seven
days a week -- just not at their desks. Unlike mobile workers, who usually stay
in close contact with managers, “nanobots thrive on their driven natures and on
the personal freedom with which they are entrusted,” (2008, par.2).
Interestingly, they are high achievers who are self-motivated and produce good
results with little supervision, They are found at many levels of an organization,
from sales managers to senior executives. Allowed to find their own balance
between work and personal lives, they usually put work first (2008).
Pauleen, D. & Harmer, B. (2008, Dec. 15). Away from the desk...always. Wall Street Journal Digital
Network. Retrieved Dec. 22, 2008, from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122911032462702387.html
Paraphrasing
Good paraphrases…
Source: http://
www.academicintegrity.uoguelph.ca/
Paraphrasing
Good paraphrases…
Source: Mueller RO and Hancock GR. (2001). Factor Analysis and Latent Structure: Confirmatory
Factor Analysis. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Social and
Behavioral Sciences (pp. 5239-5244). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
Paraphrasing
Good paraphrases…
ORIGINAL
PARAPHRASE
To prevent osteoporosis, experts believe it is important to build
bone mass before adulthood (Johnson et al., 2008).
Johnson, C.S., MeLeod, W., Kennedy, L., and McLeod, K. (2008).Osteoporosis Health Beliefs
Among Younger and Older Men and Women [Electronic version]. Health Education & Behavior
35(5)721-733.
Paraphrasing
Good paraphrases…
DOER of the
action is in the object
position
(PASSIVE)
DOER is the
subject of the
sentence
(ACTIVE)
Good paraphrases also…
Original:
There's a new class of worker out there: Nearly Autonomous, Not in the Office,
doing Business in their Own Time Staff. Or nanobots, for short. Empowered by
their mobile devices and remote access to the corporate network, nanobots put
in long hours, sometimes seven days a week -- just not at their desks. Different
from mobile workers, who usually stay in close contact with managers, nanobots
thrive on their driven natures and on the personal freedom with which they are
entrusted. Found at many levels of an organization, from sales managers to
senior executives, they are self-starting high achievers who produce strong
results with a minimum of supervision. Allowed to find their own equilibrium
between work and private lives, they tend to put work first.
Paraphrase #2:
Mobile devices and corporate networks with remote access have spawned a
new breed of employee at a variety of organizational levels: the “nanobot” or
“Nearly Autonomous, Not in the Office, doing Business in their Own Time”
(Pauleen and Harmer, 2008, para. 1). Pauleen and Harmer describe these
workers as “self-starting high achievers” (para. 2) who work best when
allowed to operate autonomously. Though they work with much less oversight
than typical mobile workers, nanobots are more likely to put work ahead of
personal priorities, tend to work longer than their on-site counterparts and
Pauleen, D. & Harmer, B. (2008, Dec. 15). Away from the desk...always. Wall Street Journal Digital
produce high quality work (2008). Network. Retrieved Dec. 22, 2008, from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122911032462702387.html
Version #2 = Paraphrase
Paraphrase #2:
Mobile devices and corporate networks with remote access have spawned a
new breed of employee at a variety of organizational levels: the “nanobot” or
“Nearly Autonomous, Not in the Office, doing Business in their Own Time”
(Pauleen and Harmer, 2008, para. 1). Pauleen and Harmer describe these
workers as “self-starting high achievers” (para. 2) who work best when
allowed to operate autonomously. Though they work with much less oversight
than typical mobile workers, nanobots are more likely to put work ahead of
personal priorities, tend to work longer than their on-site counterparts and
produce high quality work (2008).
Citation Tips
▪In the following slides, you’ll see
examples of how to cite information in
text. Examples are shown in APA
format.
Cite your sources
Fleisher, C. (2008). Using open source data in developing competitive and marketing
intelligence. European Journal of Marketing, 42(7/8), 852-866. Retrieved December 19,
2008, from ABI/INFORM Global database. (Document ID: 1550179001).
Cite your sources
Fleisher, C. (2008). Using open source data in developing competitive and marketing
intelligence. European Journal of Marketing, 42(7/8), 852-866. Retrieved December 19,
2008, from ABI/INFORM Global database. (Document ID: 1550179001).
Cite your sources
Name the original source in your signal phrase, and cite the source where you
found the information in parentheses:
y = x cot(πx/2a).
Lee, H.J. (2008). Spatial and temporal population genetic structure of five Northeastern Pacific
littorinid gastropod species. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Guelph, 2008).
Lee, H.J. (2008). Spatial and temporal population genetic structure of five Northeastern Pacific
littorinid gastropod species. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Guelph, 2008).
EFFECTIVE PRESENTATION SKILLS
1. Motivation
2. Presentation Process
3. Presentation Techniques
4. Practice
A fear worse than death
● Be passionate
● Prepare
● Practice
As with everything, there’s a process
● Be natural
○Avoid difficult, technical language
○Avoid jargon
○Speak a little slower than normal
● Be obvious
○Do not assume audience understands
implications
○Avoid “inside jokes”
● Be punctual
○Finish on time or before
Vocal variety
● Show enthusiasm
●Speak slowly and clearly
● Project to fill the whole room
● No Ummm’s or ahhhh’s
Pleasant grin
● Visibility
● Movement
● Number of seats
● Seating arrangement
● Distracters
Handouts – only if required
● Distribute handouts:
○At end if possible
○At beginning only if audience needs them during
presentation
○Not during
● Print one-sided, with 2, 3 or 6 to a page
● Staple beforehand
Summary: Your presentation will be
great if you make it:
● Audience centered
● Accomplish your objective
● Fun for the audience
● Fun for you
● Finish within the time frame
How to Practice