Why proxy wars are the new warfare strategy.

 Cost-Effective: Proxy wars are a cost-effective way for nations to pursue their interests
without incurring the direct costs and risks of military action. They can mobilize and support
proxy forces at a fraction of the cost of deploying their own troops.
 Deniability: One of the key advantages of proxy wars is that they allow nations to maintain
deniability. They can deny any direct involvement in the conflict, making it difficult for other
nations to hold them accountable for the actions of their proxy forces.
 Political and Diplomatic Leverage: By supporting proxy forces, nations can exert significant
political and diplomatic leverage over other nations. For example, a nation may use its proxy
forces to shape the outcome of elections, secure access to resources, or exert control over
strategic locations.
 Avoidance of International Law: By relying on proxy forces, nations can avoid the constraints
of international law, such as the Geneva Conventions, which regulate the conduct of
warfare. This allows them to pursue their interests in ways that would otherwise be
prohibited.
 Low Risk: Proxy wars present relatively low risks to the sponsoring nations. If the proxy
forces are defeated, the sponsoring nation can simply withdraw its support, leaving the
proxy forces to bear the consequences of their actions. This allows nations to pursue their
interests with limited risk to their own forces.
 Minimizing Casualties: By relying on proxy forces, nations can reduce the number of
casualties among their own military personnel. This is particularly important for nations with
limited resources or political concerns about the impact of military casualties on public
opinion.

Write debate point outlining the evolution of warfare.

 Technological Advances: Warfare has evolved dramatically over the centuries due to
advancements in technology. From the invention of firearms and tanks to the development
of drones and cyberwarfare, technology has changed the way wars are fought and has
increased the destructive potential of military forces
 Changing Strategic Objectives: The objectives of warfare have changed over time, reflecting
the changing political and economic landscape. For example, in the past, wars were often
fought over territory and resources, while today they are more likely to be fought over
ideology or influence.
 The Role of Non-State Actors: The role of non-state actors in warfare has grown in recent
years, with groups such as terrorists and militias playing a significant role in conflicts around
the world. This has challenged traditional notions of warfare and has forced nations to adapt
their military strategies to address these new threats.
 The Impact of Globalization: The rise of globalization has changed the nature of warfare,
with conflicts increasingly having global implications and affecting multiple countries and
regions. This has made it more difficult for nations to isolate themselves from the
consequences of war and has increased the need for international cooperation in addressing
conflicts.
 The Evolution of Military Doctrine: The development of new military doctrines, such as
asymmetric warfare, has reflected the changing nature of warfare. These doctrines are
designed to address the challenges posed by new forms of conflict and to enhance the
effectiveness of military forces in achieving their objectives.
  The Importance of Intelligence: The role of intelligence in warfare has become increasingly
important, with intelligence gathering and analysis playing a key role in shaping military
strategy and decision-making. The development of new technologies, such as artificial
intelligence, is further transforming the intelligence landscape and shaping the evolution of
warfare.

Why nations use proxy wars instead of engaging in asymmetric warfare.

 Cost: Proxy wars can be a more cost-effective means of pursuing a nation's interests, as the
nation can fund and support proxy forces instead of committing its own military resources.
This can be especially appealing to nations with limited military capabilities or to those
seeking to limit the political and economic consequences of direct military intervention.
 Deniability: Proxy wars allow nations to pursue their objectives without being directly
implicated, providing them with a degree of deniability. This can be important for nations
seeking to avoid political or legal repercussions for their actions
 Access to Local Knowledge and Resources: Proxy forces are often made up of local
individuals with knowledge of the local culture and environment, making them more
effective in pursuing a nation's objectives. This can be especially valuable in conflict zones
where local knowledge and resources are critical to success.
 Avoidance of Direct Confrontation: By using proxy forces, nations can avoid direct
confrontation with their adversaries, reducing the risk of retaliation and escalation. This can
be particularly important in situations where direct military intervention would be highly
risky or where the consequences of failure would be severe.
 Gradual Escalation: Proxy wars allow nations to gradually escalate their involvement in a
conflict, allowing them to test the waters and assess the response of their adversaries before
committing more resources. This can provide nations with a degree of strategic flexibility,
allowing them to adjust their tactics and objectives as the situation evolves.
 Influence and Control: By supporting proxy forces, nations can exert influence and control
over the outcome of a conflict, shaping events to align with their interests. This can be
especially valuable in situations where direct military intervention is not feasible or where
the nation's objectives are more indirect.

Why military technological advancement is much more important than military

personnel.

 Increased Effectiveness: Technological advancements can significantly increase the

effectiveness of military forces, providing them with greater firepower, mobility, and
situational awareness. This can give military personnel a critical advantage in combat,
allowing them to achieve their objectives more quickly and effectively.
 Reduced Casualties: Technological advancements can also reduce the number of casualties
among military personnel, making wars less deadly and reducing the human toll of conflict.
For example, unmanned aerial vehicles and other forms of remote sensing can reduce the
need for soldiers to operate in harm's way, while advanced body armor and medical
technologies can improve survival rates.
 Improved Logistics: Technological advancements can improve the logistics and support
systems that sustain military operations, allowing military personnel to operate more
effectively in the field. This includes advancements in transportation, communication, and
 supply chain management, which can improve the speed, efficiency, and sustainability of
military operations.
 Enhanced Strategic Options: Technological advancements can provide military leaders with
enhanced strategic options, allowing them to pursue a wider range of objectives and to
tailor their tactics to the specific requirements of each situation. This can provide military
personnel with greater flexibility and responsiveness, allowing them to adapt to changing
circumstances and to respond to evolving threats.
 Increased Deterrence: Technological advancements can also increase the deterrent value of
military forces, making it less likely that nations will engage in conflict. This can create a
stabilizing effect and reduce the likelihood of wars, making the world a safer place for
military personnel and civilians alike.
 Cost Savings: Technological advancements can also result in cost savings, reducing the
overall cost of military operations and allowing resources to be redirected to other areas.
This can be especially important for nations with limited budgets, allowing them to maximize
the impact of their military investments.

Why Vietnam war protest stopped the Vietnam war.

 Mobilization of Public Opinion: The protests against the Vietnam War helped to mobilize
public opinion against the conflict, highlighting the human cost of the war and the lack of
progress being made. This helped to create a groundswell of opposition to the war and put
pressure on political leaders to change their stance.
 Raising Awareness: The protests brought the issue of the war to the forefront of public
discourse, raising awareness about the consequences of the conflict and the impact it was
having on soldiers, their families, and the wider population. This helped to shift public
opinion and make the war a more prominent political issue.
 Political Pressure: The protests put political pressure on leaders, both in the United States
and internationally, to reconsider their support for the war. This pressure was exerted
through various channels, including mass demonstrations, lobbying, and media campaigns,
and helped to create a sense of urgency around the need for change.
 Impact on the Military: The protests also had a direct impact on the military, as soldiers and
veterans became involved in the movement and spoke out against the war. This helped to
create a sense of moral and ethical opposition to the conflict and made it more difficult for
leaders to sustain the war effort.
 Economic Costs: The protests brought attention to the economic costs of the war,
highlighting the impact it was having on national budgets and the broader economy. This
helped to create a sense of fiscal responsibility and made it more difficult for leaders to
justify continued support for the conflict.
 Global Momentum: The protests against the Vietnam War helped to create a global
momentum for peace, as anti-war movements developed in other countries and people
around the world began to demand an end to the conflict. This helped to create a sense of
international pressure and made it more difficult for leaders to sustain the war effort.

How Has War Changed Since Vietnam?

 Since Vietnam, the evolution of war weapons has allowed people to conduct war remotely.
Though ground forces still play a role in battle, many pieces of military technology allow war
to be waged from a distance. Some of these top pieces of military technology include:
 Drones
 o Thousands of miles away from battlefields, troops can deploy and pilot combat
drones that fly into combat zones. These drones can be used for reconnaissance,
airstrikes and various other purposes. Some popular models include the General
Atomics Avenger and the Boeing Insitu ScanEagle. The Avenger features an electro-
optical targeting system, internal weapons storage and S-shaped exhaust, making it
a deadly weapon. The ScanEagle is perfect for reconnaissance and surveying the
battlefield.
 Tomahawk Missiles
o First used in Operation Desert Storm in 1991, Tomahawk cruise missiles fly at
subsonic speeds at low altitudes to allow them to attack a wide swath of surface
targets. These missiles are jet engine-powered and utilize GPS receivers for
extremely accurate targeting. The missiles are so advanced that they can be
redirected to different coordinates even after launch.
 Space Weapons
o Developed during the Cold War, space weapons allow countries to shoot a range of
warheads from space to targets on Earth, destroy satellites or space systems in orbit
and disable enemy missiles that might be traveling through space as well. Major
military powers have developed space weapons that can even destroy enemy
satellites.

Proxy Wars Between US and Soviet Union

1. Korea War
2. Cuba
3. Vietnam
4. Congo
5. Angola
6. Afghanistan