6.
Summary Statement
Competency Element
PE1 KNOWLEDGE AND SKILL BASE
PE1.1 Comprehensive, theory-based
understanding of the underpinning
natural and physical sciences and the
engineering fundamentals applicable to
the engineering discipline
PE1.2 Conceptual understanding of the
mathematics, numerical analysis,
statistics and computer and
information sciences which underpin
the engineering discipline
PE1.3 In-depth understanding of
specialist bodies of knowledge within
the engineering discipline
Hettiarachchige Malaka Gunasekara
Paragraph number in the
A brief summary of how you have
career episode(s) where
applied the element
the element is addressed
I gained my initial theory based 1.3.3, 1.3.5, 1.3.6
knowledge and developed my analytical 2.3.11, 3.3.14
skills from University of Moratuwa where
I obtained my bachelor’s degree in
Electrical Engineering.
Load current calculations in varying
voltage systems required clear
understanding of the engineering
fundamentals of direct current.
Understanding of vector diagrams was
required to make decision on
interchanging phases on a zig-zag
transformer.
I designed the backup protection scheme
for capacitor banks. The theory of
grading the protection functions were
applied during this exercise.
I manually calculated the battery sizing 1.3.11, 2.3.12, 3.3.13
chart as per IEEE-1115-2000 standard. It
was a recursive calculation method. I was
able to understand the concept of the
calculation by reading the standard. I
arrived at the same answer as the
software.
Mapping between RTD sensor
information, 4-20mA signals and
absolute values require numerical
analysis. This was required during
programming of transducers and SCADA
components.
Integrating IED’s into IEC61850 SCADA
required conceptual understanding of
computer and information science. I was
able to master the connectivity concept
when adding the capacitor bank IED’s
into the local SCADA system.
In the capacitor bank project I 2.3.10, 1.3.18, 1.3.20,
programmed the GE F650 relays entirely. 1.3.22
It gave me a thorough and deep
understanding into relay programming
and IEC 61850 communication protocol.
By commissioning battery banks I
Page 44 | 50

PE1.4 Discernment of knowledge
development and research directions
within the engineering discipline
PE1.5 Knowledge of contextual factors
impacting the engineering discipline
PE1.6 Understanding of the scope,
principles, norms, accountabilities and
bounds of contemporary engineering
practice in the specific discipline
Hettiarachchige Malaka Gunasekara
educated myself with the do’s and don’ts
of batteries. My in depth understanding
saved time and effort by commissioning
the battery banks in the shortest possible
and immediate acceptance by end client.
After the successful completion of the 2.3.6
CE2 I had a better understanding of
capacitor bank systems. I also saw many
points that could improve further from
my own system. So I developed a
document to simplify the control scheme
which can be used for future projects. It
was very much useful in a future project
and was much praised by the
management.
In CE3 I directly contacted suppliers for
purchasing of high voltage equipment. I 3.3.1, 3.3.15, 2.4.2
was required to have a knowledge of
procurement activities to make
beneficial decision for the company. I got
familiar with purchase orders, letter of
credits, bank guarantees and shipping
documents.
Labour management crucial part in CE3.
Instead recruiting skilled workers I
outsourced it to a labour supplier
company. For certain defined tasks like
cable pulling I made work contracts
instead of daily wages.
A satisfied client usually makes the tasks
easy for a contractor. Therefore in CE2 I
tried to manage the demanding client by
slightly extending beyond my scope of
work. It proved to be successful when
the client immediately accepted the
facility with minimum defect
notifications.
In CE3 I was full time at site during 3.3.6, 3.3.7, 2.3.11,
critical work. Work during interruptions 1.3.8
and work which required high level of
safety supervision was critical as per the
norms of the power engineering
industry. I was accountable for the
technical tasks and I understood that
accountability couldn’t be transferred.
In CE2 I graded backup protection
according to the accepted practice in CEB
Page 45 | 50

PE2 ENGINEERING APPLICATION ABILITY
PE2.1 Application of established
engineering methods to complex
engineering problem solving
PE2.2 Fluent application of engineering
techniques, tools and resources
PE2.3 Application of systematic
engineering synthesis and design
processes
Hettiarachchige Malaka Gunasekara
and within the bounds of protection
principles.
Developing load cycle for non-
continuous loads require understanding
of the operations of a grid substation.
Further all calculations were carried out
as per the industry accepted
international standards.
Developing the control panel including 2.3.10, 3.3.9, 3.3.10,
its logic and schematics in CE2. 1.3.21, 1.3.23
Solving the AVR parallel issue and VT
placement issue in CE3.
Simulating earth faults and generating
other alarms to test the DC system in
CE1.
I used Megger insulation resistance 3.3.7, 2.3.12, 2.3.11,
tester, Omicron CPC100, Megger 2.3.10
TM1800 and Ponovo CT analyser for
testing of high voltage equipment.
I used omicron IED scout to test
IEC61850 signals and mimic SCADA
systems.
I used Omicron CMC 256 for relay
testing.
I used Enervista software to program GE
relays and export .iec files for SCADA
communication.
In CE2 the schematic designs followed
standard GE panel schematics as much as 2.3.8, 1.3.2, 3.3.2,
possible. The principles of DC distribution 3.3.3, 3.3.4
remained unchanged. The schematics
were developed systematically
maintaining the flow of standard GE
panel design concepts intact.
The DC system design report was created
with each step clearly mentioned for
better understanding of the client in CE1.
In CE3 the SLD, Layouts and sections
were designed and submitted in an
orderly manner to client for a smoother
design approval.
Page 46 | 50

PE2.4 Application of systematic
approaches to the conduct and
management of engineering projects
PE3 PROFESSIONAL AND PERSONAL ATTRIBUTES
I considered safety as the number one
priority in all tasks. I always ensured that
proper earthing tools were available at
site.
PE3.1 Ethical conduct and professional
accountability
PE3.2 Effective oral and written
communication in professional and lay
domains
Hettiarachchige Malaka Gunasekara
3.4.1, 1.3.15, 3.2.4,
In CE3 I developed responsibility
matrices to commissioning engineers and
technical officers. Further I submitted a
weekly schedule to the client and
followed up on my staff to stay on target.
In CE1 I prepared formats for battery cell
readings. This helped the electricians to
take the correct readings of the battery
cells in an efficient manner.
I prepared a project schedule for myself
in CE3 and kept track of progress. I also
prepared a major equipment list to keep
track of procurement activities. This
helped me to get the material delivered
on time.
3.3.4, 3.3.6, 3.4.2,
3.4.3, 1.4.3, 2.4.2
I communicated with the client
personnel and demonstrated full
accountability for my staff.
I never delivered substandard products
or handed over faulty systems
deliberately.
I took the work load into my shoulders
during instances where project was
bound to get delayed. By doing so I was
able to finish the projects on time.
2.4.3, 3.2.4, 1.3.2,
Communication with overseas suppliers 1.3.14
by e mail and skype calls were required
extensively when designing the new
panels in CE2.
Communication with skilled and
unskilled workers at site was required to
motivate them in CE3.
Technical letters and design report
submissions to client were very clear and
descriptive. It ensured easy
understanding by client and faster
approval.
Page 47 | 50

PE3.3 Creative innovative and proactive
demeanour
PE3.4 Professional use and
management of information
PE3.5 Orderly management of self, and
professional conduct
PE3.6 Effective team membership and
team leadership
Hettiarachchige Malaka Gunasekara
Negotiating with DC charger
manufacturer to activate extra features
in CE1.
Solving the VT placement issue in CE3. 3.3.2, 2.3.8, 1.4.4
Ordering material based on their timely
requirement at site made the project run
smoothly and finished 2 months ahead.
Designing of a new control panel for
capacitor bank control with minimal cost.
Refreshed the batteries before carrying
out the capacity check discharge for
client in CE1.
I used Microsoft project to prepare my 3.4.1, 3.3.3
schedule. I used predecessors and
successors to link the tasks and thereby
planned the tasks very efficiently in CE3.
I maintained a proper file and folder
structure in the common file server to
store the drawings and calculation files
of the project in soft form. This was very
convenient when preparing the as built
drawings in CE3.
I never shared drawings between
manufacturers and maintained
professionalism. I always honoured
intellectual property rights. I did not
misuse price sensitive information which
I had access.
I organized myself before trying to 3.3.7, 1.4.2, 2.3.13
organize others. I made plans for myself
and followed up on my work output. I
also delegated tasks to my subordinates
and gave them deadlines. However I
never exposed my subordinate’s short
comings to the top management as the
accountability of work completion was
always with me.
I always maintained the highest level of
integrity with suppliers. I always referred
contract agreements and adhered to it.
In CE2 the same system was erected in 3 2.3.9, 3.1.2
substations. I had one technical officer in
each substation. I lead the first site with
Page 48 | 50
 all technical officers so they get
accustomed to this new system. Later
they communicated with each other and
was able to erect the panels and cables
with less support from me. I always
praised them for their positive output
and warned them when being
unproductive.

In CE3 I had site meetings to clarify

unclear technical points. I always
reminded the importance of finishing on
time. At every milestone a special dinner
was arranged to boost up the morale of
the engineers and electricians with the
consent of the project manager.

Hettiarachchige Malaka Gunasekara Page 49 | 50