Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/367463692
CITATIONS READS
0 76
5 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Development and application of a low cost mechanical lifter for safe handling of agricultural products View project
Development of Reliability Rating Test Standards for High Efficiency Large tractor View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Mohammod Ali on 27 January 2023.
REVIEW ARTICLE
Department of Smart Agricultural Systems, Graduate School, Chungnam National University, Daejeon
1
Abstract
Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) are broadly used in smart agriculture especially in plant
factories because of energy efficiency and variable spectrum characteristics. LEDs can
promote plant growth and photomorphogenesis that improves plant yield and quality in the
control environment. The objectives of this paper were to review the advantages of LEDs on
phototrophic plants, different light detection systems, and intelligent control systems of LED
illumination on plants inside plant factories. The typical LEDs supplement light devices and
intelligent control systems that are regulated by various control models. The narrowband
LEDs with the simplest combination of wavelengths can optimize light and promote
photosynthesis. Blue light is advantageous for chloroplast improvement and can increase
the amount of chlorophyll in algal cells. Red light is the best light source to keep short-lived
plants from blooming and sometimes helps plants bloom in dark times when distant red light
can counter the effects of red light. The review demonstrated that fuzzy logic control systems
are more reliable compared to other intelligent control methods such as intelligent machine
OPEN ACCESS vision, wireless intelligent control systems, and PID control. The future development direction
and application prospects of LEDs with intelligent control are addressed for ensuring the
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12972/pastj.20220001
quality and productivity of cultivating plans inside the plant factories.
Received: December 24, 2021
Revised: March 20, 2022
Keywords: LED, Intelligent control, Homogeneity, Light intensity, Fuzzy logic.
Accepted: March 30, 2022
Copyright: © 2022 Korean Society of
Precision Agrculture
Introduction
This is an Open Access article
distributed under the terms of
theCreativeCommonsAttributionNon-Commercial
License (http: //creativecommons.org/licenses/by- The plant factory is a facility that helps producers to grow plants by artificially managing the environment
nc/4.0/)whichpermitsunrestrictednon-commercial
(e.g., light, temperature, humidity, carbon dioxide concentration, and culture solution) which is shown in
use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited. Fig. 1 ( Saya et al., 2018). This allows gardeners to produce high-quality veggies all year. Plant factories can
grow vegetables two to four times faster than traditional outdoor farming by managing the indoor environment. Furthermore, because
many cultivation shelves (a multi-shelf system) are used, bulk vegetable production in a limited space is made easier. The role of plant
factories is illustrated in Fig. 2 (Kozai, 2016).
Light is controlled appropriately to maintain the optimal environment for photosynthesis, trigger improved productivity, improved
stability, improved safety, improved functionality (Poulson and Thai, 2015). LED light illumination is one of the most important
parameters for crop production. LEDs have the potential to be used as both supplemental and sole-source lighting in glasshouses and
plant factory systems, where plants are cultivated indoors under controlled climatic conditions (Bayat et al., 2018). LEDs provide a
number of advantages, including linear photon output, durability, and a long operational lifespan, as well as the potential to be built
into enormous arrays that produce high Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR) for plant growth and development. LED modules
also produce less heat than older lighting systems like High-Pressure Sodium, Halide, and Fluorescent tubes (Kozai, 2016). Such an
arrangement will assist agriculture to get rid of assets and environmental limitations and ensure sustainable agricultural development.
It is quite difficult to produce crops firmly due to environmental changes (UN, 2014). Consequently, expectable and consistent yields
are difficult to achieve (Newcombe et al., 1979; Rosenzweig et al., 1992). Because of the different bottlenecks like drought, salinity,
flood, etc. in agriculture; plant factory is getting popular for crop production day by day (Islam et al., 2021).
The system practices a high-precision environment to adapt to the indoor climate, reduce lighting, temperature, and proportion, and
integrate intelligent control, contemporary industry, biotechnology, nutrition solutions, agriculture, and technology of information to
achieve high precision implementation. Control of environmental aspects so that plant growth is hardly limited by outward natural
situations (Lambin et al., 2011; Newcombe et al., 1979). The aim of the industrial plant production system is to provide high-quality
horticultural products with high quality and cleanliness.
Currently, maximum crops and herbs are not only sold in huge superstores but also in the foodservice industry. In these industries,
plant factory produced vegetables are free from pesticides, pollutants, and insects which greatly reduces the cost of hygienic processing
(Brandon et al., 2016; Rosenzweig et al., 1992). Therefore, factory plants are considered as an important way to solve problems like the
shortage of new generation workers in the future in view of the shortage of resources and high demand for food. Food self-sufficiency
has been widely praised by countries throughout the world for its usefulness in future space engineering exploration.
Japan, Netherland, and China are the most represented countries in the world whereas Japanese development of artificial light
plant factories is relatively fast and pioneering (Kozai et al., 2006). Although basic science and technology are equivalent, most of the
technologies used in artificial lighting (PFAL) plant factories are different from those used in horticulture and agriculture. Therefore,
new thoughts are needed for PFAL technology, such as uplifting systems, the use of green LEDs, a hydroponic growing system with
limited core mass, year-round production, and the use of natural energy in PFAL.
Plant Factory (PFs) uses Single Source Lighting (SSL) for inside crop production. SSL is a technical factor that limits the
development of the PF industry. Over the past decade, light-emitting diode (LED) technology has advanced to the point of global
commercial adoption (Kozai, 2013). LEDs control the photosynthesis of the granules, controlling the spectral emission of photons that
were not previously present. The history of the use of LEDs in grain production is studied, including research on the role of different
bands in plant response control and the growth of next-generation LED illuminators with improved grain production control functions
with improved quality characteristics (Sezina et al., 1999).
The use of LEDs as lighting devices has become popular because of their energy-efficient properties (Kozai, 2013). However,
LEDs have a relatively small radiation angle compared to other types of lighting devices. This changes the intensity of light obtained
at a particular segment near the LED. Light detectors are designed to convert low light levels into an electric signal of reasonable
amplitude to avoid deterioration of the signal by external noise or pick-up. The photoresistor is a term that is sometimes used to refer to
photoconductive devices. They convert changes in incident light into differences in resistance, with resistance decreasing as the intensity
of light increases. To achieve homogeneity of light intensity, an opaque logic control system model is used to control the LED lighting
in the room (Goto, 2012). This model has several apparatuses: LED lamp, LED driver, light sensor, micro-controller, and differential
RS-485 transceiver. The symbolic reasoning system used lighting error and lighting delta error as input parameters in this model. This
method changes the duty cycle of Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) into an output where the LED cannot control the lighting of the
lamp. Using this model, the system is expected to provide homogeneity in light intensity throughout the room. Finally, the objectives
of this paper were to review the advantages of LEDs on phototrophic plants, different light detection systems, and intelligent intensity
control systems of LED illumination on plants inside plant factories.
However, in the case of several pharmaceutical plants, the consequence of sunlight intensity on the materialization and addition
of medicinal substances is different, some encourage the accretion of medicinal substances, and others constrain the accumulation of
medicinal substances (Gasemzareh et al., 2010). In-plant cultivation, photosynthesis often begins at photosynthetic photon flux density
(PPFD) levels of 20 μm-2 s-1 and occurs individually up to 1,000-1,500 μm-2 s-1. (Kuznetsov and Dmitriev, 2006) The flow range of
photosynthetic photons for which light acts as a signal is much wider. Photoreceptor responses (mainly plant pigments) are classified
into three kinds: very weak binding reactions, weak binding reactions, and strong binding reactions (Kneiss et al., 2008). Some cultivars
have been shown to adapt better to low light situations, while others use high PPFD (Casal et al, 1998).
Currently, it is very difficult to accurately determine the PPFD content to transmit a chlorophyll retrograde signal. Because it relies on
the type of plant we're working with, as well as the growing conditions and the types of reactions it produces (Stutte et al., 2009).
The dry weight of lettuce was generally increased when lettuce was kept at 100 µmol µm-2 µs-1 using red LED (660 nm) and blue
LED (450 nm) (Stutte et al., 2009) When the last red LED (640 nm), blue LED (440 nm), and PPFD stayed at 300 μm-2 s-1 (Furuyama
et al., 2014), the anthocyanin, antioxidant potential, and leaf area of lettuce were increased. Table 1 repersented the Some examples of
different PPFD and their effect on plants (Samuolien et al., 2012).
Table 1. Some examples of different PPFD and their effect on plants (Samuolien et al., 2012).
Number Plant PPFD/(µmol·m-2 ·s-1 ) Light source Effect on plants
1 Lettuce LED: 100 Red LEDs (660 nm) • Achieve higher biomass,
LED: 200 Blue LEDs (450 nm)
• Better plant morphology,
LED: 300
2 Mustard, Spinach Total:300 Red LEDs (638 nm) • Shorter production cycle,
and HPS lamp and
3 Red leaf lettuce LED:300 Red LEDs (640 nm) • Increased activities of anti-
4 Baby lettuce LED:210 Blue LEDs (440 nm) oxidative enzymes
HPS:300 Red LEDs (638 nm)
and HPS lamp
Mustard and spinach vitamin C is increased by using a red LED (638 nm) and a high-pressure sodium lamp (HPS) and maintained
at 300 μm-2s-1 PPFD (Artures et al., 2012).
The phenolic, tocopherol, and antioxidant capacities of la lettuce are increased by appending HPS values of 300 μmol m-2 s-1 under
conditions corresponding to hard and fast values of 210 μmol m-2 s-1 (Samuolien et al., 2012).
The most widely used PPFD bands in the field of plant farming are: The first band is 200-250 μmol m-2μs-1, while the second is 500-
800 μmol m-2μs-1. In general, the last value is heavily influenced by the crop's leaf area index (Knight and Mitchell, 1983). The PPFD
is affected by the distance between the factory and the LED. Predicting the PPFD is quite difficult. The PPFD forecasts a significant
reduction in both power plant demand and the cost of electricity. The PPFD level plants used for planting can range from 10 to 210 μ
mol m-2 μs-1, depending on the plant type, density, growing conditions, and optimization criteria chosen. The optimum measures are
chosen based on the unique goal of developing the plant. Leafy vegetables’ superior growing efficiency could be a factor.
Effect of photoperiod
Photoperiodism is the ability of plants to adapt to seasonal changes in their environment by responding to changes in day length.
. In particular, flowering is the most well-studied example of photoperiodism in plants, but additional daylength responses include
bud dormancy and bulb or tuber initiation. (Kopsel, 2006). Long photoperiods encouraged muller breeding, including leaf area, leaf
chlorophyll content, fresh weight, and dry weight. With this in mind, extending the photodiode to 24 hours reduces this effect (Craker et
al., 1983; Warrington and Norton, 1991).
For example, long-term photoperiodic plants such as wheat, spinach, and poplar require 14 hours of sunlight to bloom. Rice, corn
and sorghum are examples of short-range photoperiod plants that require fewer than 10 hours of sunlight to blossom. Photoperiods,
particularly the length of the night, have an important influence on plant development in most systems. Artificial illumination can
assure maximum yield for a particular number of crops. As a result, extending photoperiod length by maximizing and developing
plant biomass has a significant favorable impact on plant growth. When the photoperiod is raised from 16 to 24 hours, total radiation
increases by 50%, and the weight of all types of pine leaf lettuce doubles (Lactuca sativa L.). Plants exposed to continuous radiation are
30-50 percent higher than plants exposed to 16 hours of light for the same total daily radiation dosage (in moles of photons) (Sirtautas et
al., 2011). It should be noted that this outcome is obtained with low levels of PPFD.
In contrast, the effects of photoperiods on plants depend on the individual species and cultivar. In general, PPFDs and photoperiods
affect plant growth and improvement. The photoperiod power plant determines the power plant development in response to the
photoperiod (Berkovich, 2017).
Different spectral aspects of light can change the hormonal composition of plants and affect hormone transport in both active and
passive ways. In lettuce, the combination of LEDs has been shown to alter photosynthesis, growth, and morphogenesis rates. Unlike
photosynthesis in other plants, sunlight in the yellow-green spectrum enhances the photosynthetic rate of crops greatly, because light
can reach low levels of closed cultivation. (Mizuno et al., 2015). Chlorophyll absorbs less green light than red or blue light, allowing
more green light to reach the leaf's bottom layers. The slope of green light is, therefore, less dramatic than that of blue or red light
(Patushenko et al., 2015).
The extinction coefficients of different wavelengths of light in the leaves depend on the formation of the leaves and the formation
of the leaves depends on the physiological structure of the species and the intensity of light during the formation of the leaves. (Nishio,
2000). It should be emphasized, however, that the crop composition has an impact on the crop, which is dependent on the position of
the radioactive flux in the case of plant peaks, leaf area indicators, and radioactive flux.
Some experiments have shown that when the photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) increases towards the saturation point
of light in the chloroplast, it is noticed that mixed light (red and blue) is perceived in this temporary form gradually decreases. The
effectiveness of white light is very important for the growth of thermal plants, as it is almost inseparable from the green light. It is more
convenient than blue-red light, which penetrates deep into the leaves and absorbs the underlying chloroplasts, which can enhance
photosynthesis, thus sweetening plant growth. It should be noted that this occurs during plant growth under white light and high PPFD
(Patushenko et al., 2015).
The effect of the blue to the red LED ratio on leaf form, plant growth, and antioxidant phenolic buildup in red and green tendril
lettuce cultivars has been evaluated by scientists. Many studies have found that combining red and blue light reduces nitrate
accumulation in lettuce, which is important for lettuce cultivation and growth, as well as producing greater biomass (Terashima et al.,
2009). Because they are the primary source of energy for photosynthetic CO2 absorption, red and blue lights have the greatest impact
on plant growth (Lin et al., 2013). Light quality has a more complicated effect, with inconsistent results. Furthermore, different plant
species have distinct spectrum demands and photosynthetic responses, thus they must be studied and established.
Fig. 4. Different types of the LED lighting system: liftable LED lighting devices (a), China a new mobile light-
filling device (b) cylindrical lighting system (c) (Jyotsna et al, 2017).
A plant factory cultivation system combining down-lighting and up-lighting has been newly proposed, which significantly increases
lettuce yield by reducing the shade of the inner leaf, slowing the aging of the outer leaf, and improving photosynthesis (Jyotsna et al.,
2017). Up-assist lighting amplified the curvature coefficient of the photosynthetic photo response curves, providing the possibility of
culturing solar-type species under relatively low down-illumination with up-assisted lighting.
Fig. 5. The working of a smart LED lighting system with a fuzzy logic controller (Odiyur et al, 2021)
In this model, communication between master and slave is via the recommended standard 485 (RS485) managed by the
communication network (Shafer et al., 2012). The RS485 communication system allows the communication of multiple transceivers
over a bus. This topology allows each slave controller to accept requests from the master controller and continuously transmit data to
the master controller.
The system algorithm running on the master controller is shown in Fig. 7. The master controller continuously receives information
about illuminance from the light sensor array. Each piece of information received is processed separately in a fuzzy logic control
system. This process includes five steps: preprocessing, fuzzing, inference, defuzzification, and post-processing.
The fuzzy logic control system increases the PWM duty cycle when the actual luminance is lower than the expected luminance
(setpoint). This means that the LED’s light is at its brightest when the candle's actual wattage is less than the point. Otherwise, if the
actual second power exceeds the point, the PWM duty cycle will be reduced. This will dim the LED's light.
Conclusions
In-plant cultivation, LED is combined with artificial intelligence can change the point of light consistent with the evolutionary state
of the plant, with the benefit of saving energy. Blue light is advantageous for chloroplast improvement and can increase the amount
of chlorophyll in algal cells. Red light is the best light source to keep short-lived plants from blooming and sometimes helps plants
bloom in dark times when distant red light can counter the effects of red light. The review demonstrated that fuzzy logic control
systems are more reliable compared to ON-OFF control or PID control. Furthermore, the additional light angle shift has the benefit of
providing enough light for the plant to grow and thrive. The goal of a fuzzy logic control system for controlling the luminous intensity
homogeneity of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) is to overcome the problem of LED luminous intensity heterogeneity caused by small
radiation angles. An array of light sensors in the control system continuously measure the light intensity. The control system changes
the LED lighting based on the measurement results by adjusting the duty cycle of pulse width modulation (PWM). It is possible to
establish light intensity homogeneity in the room using this model of the fuzzy logic control system.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, and Forestry (IPET)
through the Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Convergence Technologies Program for Educating Creative Global Leaders, funded
by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (Project No. 320001-4), Republic of Korea.
References
Arturas BZZ, Samuoliene G, Viršilė A, Brazaitytė A, Duchovskis JJP, Novickovas A. 2012. Effect of
supplementary pre-harvest LED lighting on the antioxidant and nutritional properties of green
vegetables. In XXVIII International Horticultural Congress on Science and Horticulture for People
(IHC2010): International Symposium on 939:85-91.
Ahn, Y D, Bae S, and Kang S J. 2017. Power Controllable LED System with Increased Energy Efficiency
Using Multi-Sensors for Plant Cultivation. Energies 10: 1607.
Bai YW and Ku YT. 2008. Automatic Room Light Intensity Detection and Control Using Microprocessor and
Light Sensor. International Symposium on Consumer Electronics 54: 1 – 4.
Bayat L, Arab M, Aliniaeifard S, Seif M, Lastochkina O, Li T. 2018. Effects of growth under different light
spectra on the subsequent high light tolerance in rose plants. AoB PLANTS 10:052
Berkovich Y. 2017. LED crop illumination inside space greenhouses REACH - Reviews in Human Space
Exploration 6: 11-24.
Brandon M, Kozai T, Yamaguchi T, Takagaki M, Maruo T, and Yamori W. 2016. Next revolution of Agriculture:
A review of innovations in plant factories (3rd ) edited by CRC press. pp. 18.
Casal JJ, Sánchez RA, Botto JF. 1998. Modes of action of phytochromes, Journal of Experimental Botany
49:127-138.
Chen Y. 2019. Venetian Blind Control System Based on Fuzzy Neural Network for Indoor Daylighting, in
Computer and Electrical Engineering, 2009. ICCEE '09. Second International Conference on, 269-273.
Craker L E, Seibert M, and Clifford J T. 1983. Growth and Development of Radish (Raphanus sativus, L .)
Under Selected Light Environments, Annals of Botany 51:59-64.
Darkó É, Heydarizadeh P, Schoefs B and Sabzalian M. 2014. Photosynthesis under artificial light: The shift
in primary and secondary metabolism Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London.
Series B, Biological Sciences 369: 0243.
Dorai M. 2003. The use of supplemental lighting for vegetable crop production: light intensity, crop
response, nutrition, crop management, cultural practices, Canadian Greenhouse Conference.
D'Souza C, Yuk H G, Khoo G H. 2015. Application of Light-Emitting Diodes in Food Production, Postharvest
Preservation, and Microbiological Food Safety and W. Zhou, Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science
and Food Safety 14: 719-740.
Furuyama S, Ishigami Y, Hikosaka S, and Goto E. 2014. Effects of blue/red ratio and light intensity on
photomorphogenesis and photosynthesis of red leaf lettuce, Acta Horticulturae 1037:317- 322.
Ghasemzaeh A, Jaafar H Z, Rahmat A, Wahab P M and Halim M. 2010. Effect of Different Light Intensities
on Total Phenolics and Flavonoids Synthesis and Anti-oxidant Activities in Young Ginger Varieties
(Zingiber officinale Roscoe), International Journal of Molecular Sciences 38: 85-97.
Goto E. 2012. Plant production in a closed plant factory with artificial lighting, International Society for
Horticultural Science (ISHS), Leuven, Belgium 956: 37-49.
Graamans L, Dobbelsteen A v d, Meinen E, and Stanghellini C. 2017. Plant factories; crop transpiration and
energy balance, Agricultural Systems 153:138-147.
Jyotsna J, Geng Z, Shanqi S, Kanyaratt S, Chihiro K A W, and Wataru Y. 2017. A Combination of Downward
Lighting and Supplemental Upward Lighting Improves Plant Growth in a Closed Plant Factory with
Artificial Lighting, HortScience: a publication of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 52: 831-
835.
Kim SJ, Hahn EJ, Heo JW, and Paek KY. 2004. Effects of LEDs on net photosynthetic rate, growth and leaf
stomata of chrysanthemum plantlets in vitro, Scientia Horticulturae, 101:143-151.
Kneiss J, Shinomura T, Furuya M, and Bolle C. 2008. A Rice Phytochrome A in Arabidopsis: The Role of the
N-terminus under red and far-red light, Molecular Plant, 1(1): 84-102.
Knight S L and Mitchell C A. 1983. Enhancement of lettuce yield by manipulation of light and nitrogen
nutrition, HortScience: a publication of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 108: 750-754.
Kopsel D, Lefsrud M, Augé R and A J. 2006. Biomass Production and Pigment Accumulation in Kale Grown
Under Increasing Photoperiods, HortScience: a publication of the American Society for Horticultural
Science, 41: 58-61
Kozai T. 2016. Plant factory in japan: current situation and perspectives, Chron Hortic, 8:11.
Kozai T. 2013. Resource use efficiency of closed plant production system with artificial light: concept,
estimation and application to plant factory, Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci, 89: 447 - 461.
Kozai T. 2013. Sustainable plant factory: closed plant production systems with artificial light for high
resource use efficiencies and quality produce, Acta Horticulturae, 10: 27-40.
Kozai T, Ohyama K, and Chun C. 2006. Commercialized closed systems with artificial lighting for plant
production, Acta Horticulturae, 711: 61-70.
Lambin E F and Meyfroidt P. 2011. Global land-use change, economic globalization, and the looming land
scarcity, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 108: 3465 -3472.
Lin KH, Huang MY, Huang WD, Hsu MH, Yang ZW, and Yang CM. 2013. The effects of red, blue, and white
light-emitting diodes on the growth, development, and edible quality of hydroponically grown lettuce
(Lactuca sativa L. var. capitata), Scientia Horticulturae, 150: 86 -91.
Li W .2011. Research and Application of the Fuzzy Control Used in the Wireless Illumination Measurement
and Control System of the Greenhouse. Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), 2011. 23 – 25 May
2011. [In Chinese with English Abstract]: IEEE, 1363 – 1367.
Matta S and Mahmud S M. 2010. An Intelligent Light Control System for Power saving. Industrial
Electronics Society (IECON), 10: 3316 – 3321.
Mizuno T, Oka H, Yoshimura F, Ishida K, and Yamashino T. 2015. Insight into the mechanism of end-of-day
far-red light (EODFR)-induced shade avoidance responses in Arabidopsis thaliana, Biosci Biotechnol
Biochem, 12: 87-94.
Newcombe K and Nichols E H. 1979. An integrated ecological approach to agricultural policymaking with
reference to the urban fringe: The case of Hong Kong, Agricultural Systems, 4: 1-27
Nishio J. 2000. Why are higher plants green? Evolution of the higher plant photosynthetic pigment
complement Plant, Cell & Environment, 23: 539-548.
Poulson M E and Thai T. 2015. Effect of high light intensity on photoinhibition, oxyradicals and artemisinin
content in Artemisia annua, Photosynthetica 53: 403-409.
Rosenzweig C and Liverman D. 1992. Predicted effects of climate change on agriculture: A comparison
of temperate and tropical regions Global Climate Change: Implications, Challenges, and Mitigation
Measures, 5: 342-361.
Samuolien G, Sirtautas R, Brazaitytė A, Viršilė A, and Duchovskis P. 2012. Supplementary red LED lighting
and the changes in phytochemical content of two baby leaf lettuce varieties during three seasons,
Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 10: 701-706.
Saya M, Fujimoto Y, Hayashi Y, Fuchikami H & Hattori T. 2018. Energy cost minimization in plant factories
considering weather factors using additive Bayesian networks, Journal of International Council on
Electrical Engineering, 8:127-134
Seginer I. andIoslovich I. 1999. Optimal spacing and cultivation intensity for an industrialized crop
production system, Agricultural Systems, 3: 143-157.
SeginerI., Albright L, and Ioslovich I. 2006. Improved Strategy for a Constant Daily Light Integral in
Greenhouses, Biosystems Engineering, 93: 69-80.
Shafer M G, Saputra E, Bakar K A, Ramadhani F. 2012. Modeling of Fuzzy Logic Control System for
Controlling Homogeneity of Light Intensity from Light Emitting Diode. Third International Conference
on Intelligent Systems Mode
Stutte G, Edney S, and Skerritt T. 2009. Photo regulation of Bioprotectant Content of Red Leaf Lettuce with
Light-emitting Diodes, HortScience: a publication of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 44:
79-82.
Islam S, Reza M N, Chowdhury M, Chung S O, and Choi I S. 2021. A review on effect of ambient
environment factors and monitoring technology for plant factory, Precision Agriculture Science and
Technology 3(3)
Sugiyama H, Haruyama S and Nakgawa M.2007. Brightness Control Methods for Illumination and
Visible-Light Communication Systems. Third International conference on wireless and Mobile
Communications (ICWMC), 2007.04 – 09 March 2007. Guadeloupe: IEEE, 78 – 83.
Takemia A, Inoue S, Doi M, Kinoshita T, and Shimazaki K. 2005. Phototropins promote plant growth in
response to blue light in low light environments, The Plant Cell 17: 1120-1127.
Terashima I, Fujita T, Inoue T, Chow W S and Oguchi R. 2009. Green light drives leaf photosynthesis more
efficiently than red light in strong white light: revisiting the enigmatic question of why leaves are green,
Plant Cell Physiol, 50: 684-97.
Theoharis O, Eva R, and Carl-Otto O. 2015. Spectral Effects of Artificial Light on Plant Physiology and
Secondary Metabolism: A Review, HortScience horts, 50: 1128-1135.
United Nations World Population Prospects: The 2014 Revision Highlights New York: UN
Wallen D G and Geen G H. 1971. Light quality in relation to growth, photosynthetic rates and carbon
metabolism in two species of marine plankton algae, Marine Biology, 10: 34-43.
Warrington I J and Norton R A. 1991. An Evaluation of Plant Growth and Development under Various Daily
Quantum Integrals. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 116:544-551.
Wu H. 2016. Effect of Different Light Qualities on Growth, Pigment Content, Chlorophyll Fluorescence, and
Antioxidant Enzyme Activity in the Red Alga Pyropia haitanensis (Bangiales, Rhodophyta), Bio-Med
Research International. doi:10.1155/2016/7383918
Yamori W and Shikanai T.2016. Physiological Functions of Cyclic Electron Transport around Photosystem I
in Sustaining Photosynthesis and Plant Growth. Annual Review of Plant Biology 67:81-106.
Yamori W. 2013. Improving photosynthesis to increase food and fuel production by biotechnological
strategies in crops Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Physiology 1:113.
Zhang G, Shen S, Takagaki M, Kozai T, and Yamori W. 2015. Supplemental Upward Lighting from
Underneath to Obtain Higher Marketable Lettuce (Lactuca sativa) Leaf Fresh Weight by Retarding
Senescence of Outer Leaves, Frontiers in Plant Sciences 6:1-9.