You are on page 1of 7

RESEARCH QUESTION

↳ must be testable


must be specific

must be achievable

HYPOTHESIS

must be testable

a prediction of how IV actects DV

MINIMISING BIAS

large sample and average

use random generator

BIOETHICS
consequence for number stakeholders
=

greatest good greatest of

duty / rule =
they are responsible regardless of the impact ≈
just because it has
good consequence can't just do it
"

virtues =
action justified because it is the right thing to do personal values )


define and
explain positive negative

define explain benefit and harm

CONTROLS

negative control =
what happens if independent variable isn't /
changed , applied ( same as experimental without IV )

correlation doesn't prove causation
=
acts as demonstrates effect of IV on DV
a
comparison

positive control =
the group that shows us what a positive result altected
by IV should look like


gives the expected result

VARIABLES

extraneous variable ( uncontrolled) ≈
a variable dilterent in control and experimental group

REPLICATION

increases reliability

if only done once , no conclusion can be drawn
SELECTIVE BREEDING
BIOLOGICAL


reduced genetic variation

ETHICAL

SOCIAL


animals can be specifically targeted to not cause harm ( no horns on )
cows

POLITICAL

ECONOMIC

↳•
new varieties to sell =
more to sell

LEGAL

GMOs
BIOLOGICAL

↳ to
genes may enter weed crops reducing ability get rid of them

reduced herbicide use if plant gains resistance

ETHICAL


is it
right to interfere with nature ?
Lb

SOCIAL


allergic in individuals
might cause reactions


increase amount of food countries stops hunger
crop yield increasing in
developing
=

POLITICAL

ECONOMIC


expensive can in countries them?
developing afford
=
more people

LEGAL
CRISPR
BIOLOGICAL

↳ " "
off target cuts could lead to adverse actects other
on
genes

can create increase in crop yield
ETHICAL


unnatural ( against beliefs / moral views)
its
religious

SOCIAL

48


is a more cost ectective procedure than other medical treatments

POLITICAL

ECONOMIC

LEGAL

LB

DNA PROFILING
BIOLOGICAL

ETHICAL


privacy rights and is data secure

SOCIAL


psychological implications
48

POLITICAL

ECONOMIC

LEGAL


innocent
linking people to crimes


BACTERIAL TRANSFORMATION ( INSULIN)
BIOLOGICAL


risk
creating a dangerous pathogen

ETHICAL

43

SOCIAL

48

POLITICAL

ECONOMIC

LEGAL

VACCINATION
BIOLOGICAL

ETHICAL

48

SOCIAL


recipients have emotional distress
may

POLITICAL

ECONOMIC

LEGAL


IN GENERA:L
BIOLOGICAL


genetic diversity
reduction in increased
the ≈
susceptibility

could pass on DNA to other not modified crops

ETHICAL


data / privacy rights not secure


unnatural

SOCIAL


psychological implications due to stress


more cost effective

POLITICAL


whos responsible for controlling it


crossing borders do both need to consent

ECONOMIC

LEGAL


innocent individual linked to a crime


is there a law that restricts

You might also like