Question: | Chegg.

com

Show transcribed dataShow transcribed data

Expert Answer

Setp 1

The main objective of the reaction is to suggest the mechanism difference that is observed when
rate of reduction is seven order of magnitude slower than the reduction of its conjugate base.
[Cr(NH3)5(OH)2] 3 +

Explanation:

Conjugate base is formed when a proton is removed from an an acid.

Setp 2

The rate of reduction of by Cr[ll] is seven times slower because of the difference in the reaction
mechanism.[Cr(NH3)5(OH2)] 3 +

The has an extra ligand that can form additional bonds to a second metal. The reaction proceed
via inner sphere mechanism whereas the does not possess any ligand that are capable of bridging
in the way like . The rate of the complex with bridging ligand has polarisabilty more. The
polarisability of is much higher than , thus the rate of reduction differ for the two.
[Cr(NH3)5(OH)] 2 +

The has an extra ligand that can form additional bonds to a second metal. The reaction proceed
via inner sphere mechanism whereas the does not possess any ligand that are capable of bridging
in the way like . The rate of the complex with bridging ligand has polarisabilty more. The
polarisability of is much higher than , thus the rate of reduction differ for the two.
[Cr(NH3)5(OH2)] 3 +

The has an extra ligand that can form additional bonds to a second metal. The reaction proceed
via inner sphere mechanism whereas the does not possess any ligand that are capable of bridging
in the way like . The rate of the complex with bridging ligand has polarisabilty more. The
polarisability of is much higher than , thus the rate of reduction differ for the two.
[Cr(NH3)5(OH)] 2 +

The has an extra ligand that can form additional bonds to a second metal. The reaction proceed
via inner sphere mechanism whereas the does not possess any ligand that are capable of bridging
in the way like . The rate of the complex with bridging ligand has polarisabilty more. The
polarisability of is much higher than , thus the rate of reduction differ for the two. OH −

The has an extra ligand that can form additional bonds to a second metal. The reaction proceed
via inner sphere mechanism whereas the does not possess any ligand that are capable of bridging
in the way like . The rate of the complex with bridging ligand has polarisabilty more. The
polarisability of is much higher than , thus the rate of reduction differ for the two. H2O

Explanation:

The easily polarisable ligands like , can easily undergo electron transfer and thus has rate of
readuction seven times slower than .

finalAnswer
Thus, the Charge , bridging ligand and more polarisability are the reasons for the higher rate of
reduction in OH −

Thus, the Charge , bridging ligand and more polarisability are the reasons for the higher rate of
reduction in [Cr(NH3)5(OH)] 2 +