Attached is recap internal review balance transfer styles from Tuntex (15 styles).

Will do review with production team once all receive package this week.

I will send invitation in separate e-mail.

Done save file in Y/MD/Line sheet & person in charge/PES meeting/SS22/transfer style.

Balance review :

S222CSIW308 BR Oct 4

S222CSIW308 BR Oct 4

Will review once review package from Tuntex.

I’m changing subject email for easy follow-up.

Below is recap internal review with product.

Development team, Will do review with production team once all receive package completely.

Done save file in Y/MD/Line sheet & person in charge/ PES meeting/ SS22/ Transfer style.

Dear all,

Please find below status package (sealing, trimcard, stike-off print or pad print from Tuntex) as of today.

As per info to you thru skype before, please invite to join SS22 review transfer style in MD room today
10 AM.

Pak aris : please help to bring the sample during meeting.

Kindly also check style below and advise because style has buttonhole also but not mention interlining in
BOM. Kindly include discrepancy if any.

I added some styles for 2nd batch as below listed In the ytransfer package tracking as attached : bla bla

We got transfer from Tuntex total 23 styles, please review the pattern/measurement discrepancy at
your end.

I received from Anisa only few styles (Training Kids), how about other styles, do you still have
discrepancy or not ?

We will not send the partial discrepancy like this. Please combine from pattern team in 1 chart.
For the BOM / TP : This is part of MD job, we will make discrepancy once get the sample / TC from
Tuntex.

As informed to pattern team before, that any discrepancy should put in 1 file as attached.

Please do not make your own file. Please resend your discrepancy to use this file then MD team will add
if any discrepancy.

Kindly find attach file the discrepancy regarding pattern issue, Please help to check with the original T1.

Will noted, and confirm receive the pattern. We will back to you if have discrepancy for pattern issue.

Allow me to step in :

1. Style S222W139 not belong for AOI

2. Style S2115KJB253, S2225W136, and S2254WMR622 double pattern file : Yes, confirm can use
one of them.
3. Attached balance pattern 5 styles so there is no pending anymore.

After check, have 1 style not in list, style S2225W139 please advise.

Style S1115KJB253, S2225W136, and S22254WMR622 there is a double file, can we use one of them ?

And actually we receive style S2015KYG252 not S221KJB252 so I update list as below on yellow highlight,
balance 5 styles not yet receive.

Attached partial pattern for your reference.

I will share balance pattern and status package (sealing, trimcard) once receive from GTI.

Request pattern update adding style as below follow the question mark for the seasonal size range inter,
Asian, and Japan pattern on green highlight.

Below AD buy ready from tuntex already saved in share folder operation : …

For those not yet buy ready, will share after buy ready date because it’s production transfer.

LO just sent the transfer package request including pattern to Tuntex, expected received whit in this
week.
We are working with LO indo Merchandiser on PTP confirmation to process TP/AD under AOI (..) in
FlexPM as well as. The transfer package (sample, TC pattern) sending date from tuntex. Shall keep you
posted once received all the information.

Based on checking with actual sample for style S2125W970A part 200 stripes & part 610 3D trefoil
artwork mentions white color but looks different each other. When we compare with color standard its
not same exactly.

As per checking with Tuntex, they said CCDA not do any colorway approval for solid color. To makes sure
color followed as per Adidas standard please refer to color standard for white color on this case (refer to
column giving T1 feedback Agustust 23).

For syyle OJF22250322 before we propose 2 size group dimension already, but CCDA feedback want 3
group size.

As per discuss please help to work the grading print logo to make it in 2 size maximum for easy control
in production, KM80 & pattern side. Please provide today before lunch.

Please find pattern nest revision as DA request for below style on attachment above : …..

Please see attached pattern nest for below style and inform to DA to get approval as soon as possible.
So, we can release confirmation sample using approved artwork.

For below case we still wait feedback proposal leg shape and sleeve regarding rib issue. Cos the panel
width changes so will effect on artwork dimension.

During today weekly with LO, Sharon reminder us to ensure for grading print logo should have 2
maximum size only. Please help to review following styles and feedback.

Sorry, base on internal checking with actual sample that receive today, interlining should be use normal
interlining embro backing item 70023519. Update AD already ave in gen file. Can’t move old AD to old
gen file due to open by other PC.

Yes, we sure to use code RCY1035 for interlining laser cut embro (same with style S2225W113). Will do
internal review once receive package completely.
 1. Done send TP thru skype. Make sure to put confidential and save in gen file. Please email to kak
os & team & internal product development team on Aug 19.
2. Start to check stock material to make counter sample (3 pcs basic size) & size set. If no stock
please combine with others (desy/avi/eka) for combine to ask FOC from Tuntex.

Update interlining code bla bla bla for style S212W105 PNO. 100. As my understanding this item code is
use for pocket, collar but for this style, interlining for cover embro process. Are you sure to use this
interlining quality ? just makesure only

Please find attached recap review FW22-P2 comment on August 16. Please help to print out the file PES
& put in pattern documentation for sample room guideline. This is for your information & further follow-
up with leader sewing.

Please find P2 commment in style OJF22250802. P2 sample approved as sealing sample.

Since I have HO meeting with LO so please print-out AD & send email to internal team. Please help to
review P2 comment and provide PES meeting with team today morning.

Once rita download AD and save in gen file, please provide costing to DA within Aug 30 as per below
email.

Please inform that CCDA already release P2 comment following styles :

OJF22250321

OJF22250322

OJF22250802

Balance P2 comment style OJJF22250800 will be release in end of next week (Aug 20). OLKF22250804 .
since Hannah is holiday from August 16 to Sept 3, I am checking with simone and will advise to you once
available.

For below case we still wait feedback proposal leg shape and sleeve regarding cuff rib issue. Coz the
panel width changes so will effect on artwork dimension.

During today weekly with LO, Sharon reminder us to ensure for grading print logo should have 2
maximum size only. Please help to review following style and feedback.
Here is S22 product priority list May 2021. So far there is no changing for AOI. Attached ppt is update
product priority explanation :

1. Only product campaigns and top creators / yeezy are not elevated MDP of 95% per previous
definition, others are standard MDP 92% in 2021.
2. Reebok and adi Golf are communicated offline therefore they are not mentioned in the file.
3. Reebok and adi Golf are defined as “standard” MDP of 92%

The next update of the S22 priority report is scheduled for 8 th June 2021. Please feel free to contact me
for any question.

For style OJF22250800/802/321/322 DA will not add pocket facing in techpack since it has zipper already
as I have mention in below email on June 15. Please make sure our P2 sample have pocket facing
following BOM information.