Professional Documents
Culture Documents
We shall now obtain results that are useful in calculating limits of functions. These results
are parallel to the limit theorems established in Section 3.2 for sequences. In fact, in most
cases these results can be proved by using Theorem 4.1.8 and results from Section 3.2.
Alternatively, the results in this section can be proved by using e-d arguments that are very
similar to the ones employed in Section 3.2.
Proof. If L :¼ lim f , then for e ¼ 1, there exists d > 0 such that if 0 < jx cj < d, then
x!c
j f ðxÞ Lj < 1; hence (by Corollary 2.2.4(a)),
j f ðxÞj jLj j f ðxÞ Lj < 1:
Therefore, if x 2 A \ V d ðcÞ; x 6¼ c, then j f ðxÞj jLj þ 1. If c 2
= A, we take M ¼ jLj þ 1,
while if c 2 A we take M :¼ supfj f ðcÞj; jLj þ 1g. It follows that if x 2 A \ V d ðcÞ, then
j f ðxÞj M. This shows that f is bounded on the neighborhood V d ðcÞ of c. Q.E.D.
The next definition is similar to the definition for sums, differences, products, and
quotients of sequences given in Section 3.2.
4.2.3 Definition Let A R and let f and g be functions defined on A to R. We define the
sum f þ g, the difference f g, and the product fg on A to R to be the functions given by
ð f þ gÞðxÞ :¼ f ðxÞ þ gðxÞ; ð f gÞðxÞ :¼ f ðxÞ gðxÞ;
ð f gÞðxÞ :¼ f ðxÞgðxÞ
for all x 2 A. Further, if b 2 R, we define the multiple bf to be the function given by
ðbf ÞðxÞ :¼ bf ðxÞ for all x 2 A :
Finally, if hðxÞ 6¼ 0 for x 2 A, we define the quotient f=h to be the function given by
f f ðxÞ
ðxÞ :¼ for all x 2 A:
h hðxÞ
Proof. One proof of this theorem is exactly similar to that of Theorem 3.2.3. Alterna-
tively, it can be proved by making use of Theorems 3.2.3 and 4.1.8. For example, let (xn) be
any sequence in A such that xn 6¼ c for n 2 N, and c ¼ limðxn Þ. It follows from Theorem
4.1.8 that
limð f ðxn ÞÞ ¼ L; limðgðxn ÞÞ ¼ M:
On the other hand, Definition 4.2.3 implies that
ð f gÞðxn Þ ¼ f ðxn Þgðxn Þ for n 2 N:
Therefore an application of Theorem 3.2.3 yields
limðð f gÞðxn ÞÞ ¼ limð f ðxn Þgðxn ÞÞ
¼ ½limð f ðxn ÞÞ ½limðgðxn ÞÞ ¼ LM:
Consequently, it follows from Theorem 4.1.8 that
lim ð f gÞ ¼ limðð f gÞðxn ÞÞ ¼ LM:
x!c
The other parts of this theorem are proved in a similar manner. We leave the details to
the reader. Q.E.D.
and
L1 L2 Ln ¼ limð f 1 f 2 f n Þ:
In particular, we deduce that if L ¼ lim f and n 2 N, then
x!c
Ln ¼ lim ð f ðxÞÞn :
x!c
4.2.5 Examples (a) Some of the limits that were established in Section 4.1 can be
proved by using Theorem 4.2.4. For example, it follows from this result that since
lim x ¼ c, then lim x2 ¼ c2 , and that if c > 0, then
x!c x!c
1 1 1
lim ¼ ¼ :
x!c x lim x c
x!c
(b) lim x2 þ 1 x3 4 ¼ 20.
x!2
It follows from Theorem 4.2.4 that
lim x þ 1 x 4 ¼
2 3
lim x þ 1 2
lim x 4 3
x!2 x!2 x!2
¼ 5 4 ¼ 20:
x3 4 4
(c) lim ¼ .
x!2 x2 þ 1 5
C04 12/09/2010 14:49:11 Page 113
¼ an cn þ an1 cn1 þ þ a1 c þ a0
¼ pðcÞ:
Hence lim pðxÞ ¼ pðcÞ for any polynomial function p.
x!c
(g) If p and q are polynomial functions on R and if qðcÞ 6¼ 0, then
pðxÞ pðcÞ
lim ¼ :
x!c qðxÞ qð c Þ
Since q(x) is a polynomial function, it follows from a theorem in algebra that there are
at most
a finite number of real numbers a1 ; . . . ; am [the real zeroes of q(x)] such that q aj ¼ 0 and
such that if x 2= fa1 ; . . . ; am g, then qðxÞ 6¼ 0. Hence, if x 2
= fa1 ; . . . ; am g, we can define
pðxÞ
rðxÞ :¼ :
qðxÞ
C04 12/09/2010 14:49:11 Page 114
If c is not a zero of q(x), then qðcÞ 6¼ 0, and it follows from part (f) that lim qðxÞ ¼ qðcÞ 6¼ 0.
x!c
Therefore we can apply Theorem 4.2.4(b) to conclude that
lim pðxÞ pðcÞ
pðxÞ x!c
lim ¼ ¼ : &
x!c qðxÞ lim qðxÞ qðcÞ
x!c
Proof. Indeed, if L ¼ lim f , then it follows from Theorem 4.1.8 that if (xn) is any
x!c
sequence of real numbers such that c 6¼ xn 2 A for all n 2 N and if the sequence (xn)
converges to c, then the sequence ð f ðxn ÞÞ converges to L. Since a f ðxn Þ b for all
n 2 N, it follows from Theorem 3.2.6 that a L b. Q.E.D.
We now state an analogue of the Squeeze Theorem 3.2.7. We leave its proof to the reader.
Let f ðxÞ :¼ x for x > 0. Since the inequality x < x1=2 1 holds for 0 < x 1
3=2
We cannot use Theorem 4.2.4(b) to evaluate this limit. (Why not?) However, it follows
from the inequality (1) in part (c) that
12 x ðcos x 1Þ=x 0 for x>0
and that
0 ðcos x 1Þ=x 12 x for x < 0:
Now let f ðxÞ :¼ x=2 for x 0 and f ðxÞ :¼ 0 for x < 0, and let hðxÞ :¼ 0 for x 0 and
hðxÞ :¼ x=2 for x < 0. Then we have
f ðxÞ ðcos x 1Þ=x hðxÞ for x 6¼ 0:
Since it is readily seen that lim f ¼ 0 ¼ lim h, it follows from the Squeeze Theorem that
x!0 x!0
lim ðcos x 1Þ=x ¼ 0.
x!0
sin x
(e) lim ¼ 1.
x!0 x
Again we cannot use Theorem 4.2.4(b) to evaluate this limit. However, it will be
proved later (see Theorem 8.4.8) that
x 16 x3 sin x x for x 0
and that
x sin x x 16 x3 for x 0:
Therefore it follows (why?) that
1 16 x2 ðsin xÞ=x 1 for all x 6¼ 0:
But since lim 1 16 x2 ¼ 1 16 lim x2 ¼ 1, we infer from the Squeeze Theorem that
x!0 x!0
lim ðsin xÞ=x ¼ 1.
x!0
There are results that are parallel to Theorems 3.2.9 and 3.2.10; however, we will leave
them as exercises. We conclude this section with a result that is, in some sense, a partial
converse to Theorem 4.2.6.
then there exists a neighborhood Vd(c) of c such that f (x) > 0 [respectively, f (x) < 0] for
all x 2 A \ V d ðcÞ, x 6¼ c.
Proof. Let L :¼ lim f and suppose that L > 0. We take e ¼ 12 L > 0 in Definition 4.1.4, and
x!c
obtain a number d > 0 such that if 0 < jx cj < d and x 2 A, then j f ðxÞ Lj < 12 L.
Therefore (why?) it follows that if x 2 A \ V d ðcÞ, x 6¼ c, then f ðxÞ > 12 L > 0.
If L < 0, a similar argument applies. Q.E.D.