Alternative Attribute

Cost Distance Dining Menue Fancy

Fast Food Burger 20 3 In 1 star Not very fancy
Mexican 30 2 Patio 2 stars Not fancy
Chinese Buffet 25 7 In 2 stars Neutral
American Bar & Grill 35 4 In 3 stars Neutral
French Bistro 40 13 Patio 4 stars Fancy
Swanky Italian 80 15 Patio 3 stars Very fancy

Redundancy Datas in this matrix don’t have the same value in different attributes, no repetition. No redundancy.

Lexicography Considering the most important attribute of Cost I would pick American Bar & Grill considering the in

Satisficing Criteria= employees can't take clientes to restaurants further than 10miles fom the office.My availabl

Scaling
Cost Distance Dining Menue Fancy
Fast Food Burger 20 3 0 1 1
Mexican 30 2 1 2 2
Chinese Buffet 25 7 0 2 3
American Bar & Grill 35 4 0 3 3
French Bistro 40 13 1 4 4
Swanky Italian 80 15 1 3 5

Normalize
Cost Distance Dining Menue Fancy
Fast Food Burger 1 0.66667 0 0.25 0.2
Mexican 0.67 1 1 0.5 0.4
Chinese Buffet 0.8 0.28571 0 0.5 0.6
American Bar & Grill 0.57 0.5 0 0.75 0.6
French Bistro 0.5 0.15385 1 1 0.8
Swanky Italian 0.25 0.13333 1 0.75 1

Weights 3 2 1 3 1 10
Cost Distance Dining Menue Fancy
Fast Food Burger 1 0.66667 0 0.25 0.2
Mexican 0.67 1 1 0.5 0.4
Chinese Buffet 0.8 0.28571 0 0.5 0.6
American Bar & Grill 0.57 0.5 0 0.75 0.6
French Bistro 0.5 0.15385 1 1 0.8
Swanky Italian 0.25 0.13333 1 0.75 1

Dominance
SumProduct
Fast Food Burger 5.28333
Mexican 6.90000
Chinese Buffet 5.07143
American Bar & Grill 5.56429
French Bistro 6.60769
Swanky Italian 5.26667
o repetition. No redundancy.

Bar & Grill considering the intermidiate cost of the food.

les fom the office.My available options based o the criteria are: fast food burger,mexican,chinese buffet or american bar.

Fancy Scale Dining Scale Menu (Stars)

Very fancy 5 In inside only 0 4
Fancy 4 Patio inside and outside 1 3
Neutral 3 2
Not Fancy 2 1
Not Very Fancy 1
In= 0 less opportunity of entertainment or option of outdoor area
Patio= 1 more opportunity of entertainment and chance of having an indoor area availa

Weights
Cost Cost is 3 because the company tend to to look for the smallest cost possible and also the cost betw
Distance Distance weight is 2 because company employees already have a metric they need to follow in cas
Dining Dining is 1 due to the fact that even with a patio option, the restaurant can offer flexibility for pati
Menue Menue is 3 because whitin the options of restaurantes allowed to take the clients (according to sa
Fancy Fancy is 1 because even if a establishment is not considered fancy it can still have a good service a
 4
3
2
1

aving an indoor area available or similar to indoor (covered area)

ible and also the cost between the restaurants that are most likely to be fit into the company policy(satisficing) is very similar.
they need to follow in case of taking clients out to lunch/dinner as describing in Satisficing, but also importante enough in case some exce
an offer flexibility for patio in or outdoor as seen on the "Dining Scale".
he clients (according to satisficing criteria - company policy) the majority of restaurants on the list offer similar or equal stars for the menu
still have a good service and good food. A very fancy or fancy place will not necessarily please a client but good food it probably will.
ng) is very similar.
nte enough in case some exception is approved to not consider this metric.

ar or equal stars for the menue.

ood food it probably will.