Peer-assessment Podcast Rubric
Your name: Fernanda Reyes
Name of podcast 1: Santeria
Excellent
4 points
Topic Topic is relevant and
focuses on a specific
problem or a very defined
aspect. It’s based on or
related to the content of
the course.
Introduction Relevant information.
Establishes a clear purpose
or main idea engaging the
listener immediately.
Content Creativity and original
content enhance the
purpose of the podcast in
an innovative way. The
purpose/main idea is
illustrated by points or
examples. Accurate
information and concepts
are presented.
Delivery Well-rehearsed, smooth
delivery in a
conversational/monologue
style.
Good
3 points
Topic is relevant. Some
aspects are defined.
Based on or related to the
content of the course.
Describes the topic and
engages the audience as
the introduction proceeds.
Somehow the main
idea/purpose is illustrated.
Accurate information is
provided.
Seems rehearsed, smooth
delivery.
Needs improvement Low performance/ Points
2 points Incomplete
1-0 points
Topic is very general, Topic is vague and/or 4
covers only well-known not related to the
aspects. It’s somehow content of the course.
related to the content of
the course
Somewhat engaging and Does not include an 4
provides a vague introduction or the
purpose. purpose is vague and
unclear.
Some information is Information is 4
inaccurate. Mostly inaccurate. Just
personal opinions. personal opinions.
Appears unrehearsed Delivery is hesitant and 3
with uneven delivery. choppy and sounds like
the presenter(s) is/are
reading.
 Expression Highly effective
and style enunciation, the
presenter's speech is clear
and intelligible.
Enunciation, expression,
and pacing are effective
throughout the podcast.
Enunciation, expression, Enunciation of spoken 4
or rhythm are sometimes word is distant and
distracting during the muddled and/or not
podcast. clear.
TOTAL 19

Write your review here:

*What do you think about this project?  *Was it easy to listen to? Why or why not? *Was it informative/analytic? Why or why not?
*How does the topic relate to the class? *Did you learn something new? What? *Did you enjoy the content? Why?

This podcast was easy to listen to me, the words and the audio was clear and understandable, and they talk with expression easy to understand, I
think the topic they choose was informative and original. Most of the things they talk about I didn´t know so hearing about it was a good
experience to listen and learn. I think this topic is relevant to the class because they talk about Santeria, and we talk about the stereotypes of
some of the religions and see how most of the Africans had to change their religion so badly. This podcast was great I enjoy listening to it and
learning more about the topic.

Name of podcast 2: Experience in China

Excellent Good Needs improvement Low performance/ Points

4 points
Topic Topic is relevant and
focuses on a specific
problem or a very defined
3 points
Topic is relevant. Some
aspects are defined.
Based on or related to the
2 points Incomplete
1-0 points
Topic is very general, Topic is vague and/or 4
covers only well-known not related to the
aspects. It’s somehow content of the course.
 aspect. It’s based on or
related to the content of
the course.
Introduction Relevant information.
Establishes a clear purpose
or main idea engaging the
listener immediately.
Content Creativity and original
content enhance the
purpose of the podcast in
an innovative way. The
purpose/main idea is
illustrated by points or
examples. Accurate
information and concepts
are presented.
Delivery Well-rehearsed, smooth
delivery in a
conversational/monologue
style.
Expression Highly effective
and style enunciation, the
presenter's speech is clear
and intelligible.
Write your review here:
*What do you think about this project?  *Was it easy to listen to? Why or why not? *Was it informative/analytic? Why or why not?
content of the course.
Describes the topic and
engages the audience as
the introduction proceeds.
Somehow the main
idea/purpose is illustrated.
Accurate information is
provided.
Seems rehearsed, smooth
delivery.
Enunciation, expression,
and pacing are effective
throughout the podcast.
related to the content of
the course
Somewhat engaging and Does not include an 3
provides a vague introduction or the
purpose. purpose is vague and
unclear.
Some information is Information is 4
inaccurate. Mostly inaccurate. Just
personal opinions. personal opinions.
Appears unrehearsed Delivery is hesitant and 4
with uneven delivery. choppy and sounds like
the presenter(s) is/are
reading.
Enunciation, expression, Enunciation of spoken 3
or rhythm are sometimes word is distant and
distracting during the muddled and/or not
podcast. clear.
TOTAL 18
*How does the topic relate to the class? *Did you learn something new? What? *Did you enjoy the content? Why?

I enjoy listening to this podcast because my whole life I wanted to travel to China and see the differences between cultures, I think that she
mentioned the insect here in Mexico we eat chapulines but there eat a lot of them, and differences and it was disgusting for me because I hate
insects. This is more like a personal experience than informative, but I like to listen to those experiences she went through.

Name of podcast 3: The United States proposal to consider the Mexican cartels as terrorist
groups.

Excellent Good Needs improvement Low performance/ Points

4 points
Topic Topic is relevant and
focuses on a specific
problem or a very defined
aspect. It’s based on or
related to the content of
the course.
Introduction Relevant information.
Establishes a clear purpose
or main idea engaging the
listener immediately.
Content Creativity and original
content enhance the
purpose of the podcast in
an innovative way. The
purpose/main idea is
illustrated by points or
examples. Accurate
3 points
Topic is relevant. Some
aspects are defined.
Based on or related to the
content of the course.
Describes the topic and
engages the audience as
the introduction proceeds.
Somehow the main
idea/purpose is illustrated.
Accurate information is
provided.
2 points Incomplete
1-0 points
Topic is very general, Topic is vague and/or 4
covers only well-known not related to the
aspects. It’s somehow content of the course.
related to the content of
the course
Somewhat engaging and Does not include an 4
provides a vague introduction or the
purpose. purpose is vague and
unclear.
Some information is Information is 3
inaccurate. Mostly inaccurate. Just
personal opinions. personal opinions.
 information and concepts
are presented.
Delivery Well-rehearsed, smooth
delivery in a
conversational/monologue
style.
Expression Highly effective
and style enunciation, the
presenter's speech is clear
and intelligible.
Seems rehearsed, smooth Appears unrehearsed Delivery is hesitant and 4
delivery. with uneven delivery. choppy and sounds like
the presenter(s) is/are
reading.
Enunciation, expression, Enunciation, expression, Enunciation of spoken 4
and pacing are effective or rhythm are sometimes word is distant and
throughout the podcast. distracting during the muddled and/or not
podcast. clear.
TOTAL 19

Write your review here:

*What do you think about this project?  *Was it easy to listen to? Why or why not? *Was it informative/analytic? Why or why not?
*How does the topic relate to the class? *Did you learn something new? What? *Did you enjoy the content? Why?

This podcast was interesting to hear, this topic is important to talk about it most people ignore it, and I think is sad that things like
that happen in our county and the government is part of them. Is interesting how they propose the Mexican cartel as a terrorist. This
podcast was easy to hear and understand and once I finished listening, I keep thinking about this topic.