Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Motion For Consolidation
Motion For Consolidation
1. That these three (3) cases involve the same complainant, the same
respondent and the same set of facts and circumstances;
EMERSON A. TURINGAN
Provincial Prosecutor
Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Second Judicial Region
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
3. That these two (2) cases involve the same complainant, the same
respondent and the same set of facts and circumstances;
EMERSON A. TURINGAN
Provincial Prosecutor
Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Second Judicial Region
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
-versus-
-versus-
5. That these two (2) cases involve the same complainant, the same
respondent and the same set of facts and circumstances;
ORVILLE F. IBARRA
OIC, Provincial Prosecutor/ Prosecutor I
as per Office Order No .1 s. 2019
Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Second Judicial Region
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
-versus-
-versus-
7. That these two (2) cases involve the same complainant, the same
respondent and the same set of facts and circumstances;
ORVILLE F. IBARRA
OIC, Provincial Prosecutor/ Prosecutor I
as per Office Order No .1 s. 2019
Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Second Judicial Region
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
9. That these three (3) cases involve the same complainant, the same
respondent and the same set of facts and circumstances;
EMERSON A. TURINGAN
Provincial Prosecutor
Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Second Judicial Region
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
-versus-
11.That these two (2) cases involve the same complainant, the same
respondent and the same set of facts and circumstances;
EMERSON A. TURINGAN
Provincial Prosecutor
Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Second Judicial Region
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
-versus-
-versus-
-versus-
13.That these three (3) cases involve the same complainant and the same set
of facts and circumstances;
EMERSON A. TURINGAN
Provincial Prosecutor
Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Second Judicial Region
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
-versus-
-versus-
15.That these two (2) cases involve the same complainant, the same
respondent and the same set of facts and circumstances;
EMERSON A. TURINGAN
Provincial Prosecutor
Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Second Judicial Region
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
-versus-
-versus-
17.That these two (2) cases involve the same complainant, the same
respondent and the same set of facts and circumstances;
EMERSON A. TURINGAN
Provincial Prosecutor
Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Second Judicial Region
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
-versus-
-versus-
19.That these two (2) cases involve the same complainant, the same
respondent and the same set of facts and circumstances;
EMERSON A. TURINGAN
Provincial Prosecutor
Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Second Judicial Region
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
-versus-
-versus-
21.That these two (2) cases involve the same complainant, the same
respondents and the same set of facts and circumstances;
EMERSON A. TURINGAN
Provincial Prosecutor
Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Second Judicial Region
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
-versus-
-versus-
23.That these two (2) cases involve the same complainant, the same
respondent and the same set of facts and circumstances;
WENDELL M. BAUTISTA
OIC, Provincial Prosecutor/ Prosecutor I
as per Office Order No. 14 s. 2018
Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Second Judicial Region
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
-versus-
25.That these two (2) cases involve the same accused, the same
complainants and the same set of facts and circumstances;
EMERSON A. TURINGAN
Provincial Prosecutor
Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Second Judicial Region
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
-versus-
27.That these two (2) cases involve the same accused, the same complainant
and the same set of facts and circumstances;
EMERSON A. TURINGAN
Provincial Prosecutor
Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Second Judicial Region
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
-versus-
29.That these three (3) cases involve the same accused and the same set of
facts and circumstances;
EMERSON A. TURINGAN
Provincial Prosecutor
Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Second Judicial Region
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
31.That these two (2) cases involve the same accused, the same complainant
and the same set of facts and circumstances;
EMERSON A. TURINGAN
Provincial Prosecutor
Republic of the Philippines
Second Judicial Region
MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT OF BAYOMBONG
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
CARLITO J. OBRA
Accused.
x- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x
33.That these three (3) cases involve the same accused, the same
complainant and the same set of facts and circumstances;
EMERSON A. TURINGAN
Provincial Prosecutor
Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Second Judicial Region
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
35.That these three (3) cases involve the same accused, the same
complainant and the same set of facts and circumstances;
EMERSON A. TURINGAN
Provincial Prosecutor
Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Second Judicial Region
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
37.That these three (3) cases involve the same accused, the same
complainant and the same set of facts and circumstances;
EMERSON A. TURINGAN
Provincial Prosecutor
Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Second Judicial Region
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
-versus-
39.That these four (4) cases involve the same accused and the same modus
operandi.
EMERSON A. TURINGAN
Provincial Prosecutor
Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Second Judicial Region
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
-versus-
40.That these four (4) cases involve the same accused and the same modus
operandi.
EMERSON A. TURINGAN
Provincial Prosecutor
Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Second Judicial Region
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
41.That these three (3) cases involve the same accused, the same
complainant and the same set of facts and circumstances;
EMERSON A. TURINGAN
Provincial Prosecutor
Republic of the Philippines
Second Judicial Region
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE JUDGE
-versus-
JOFFREY SARMIENTO,
JOSEPH CALAYCAY and
ANALYN VALLEJOS,
Accused.
x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x
43.That these three (3) cases involve the same accused, the same private
complainant and the same set of facts and circumstances;
EMERSON A. TURINGAN
Provincial Prosecutor
Republic of the Philippines
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
Second Judicial Region
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya
-versus-
-versus-
1. That these two (2) cases involve the same respondent and the same set of
facts and circumstances;
EMERSON A. TURINGAN
Provincial Prosecutor