TABEL 1.

DISTRIBUSI FREKUENSI PEKERJAAN IBU

Frequencies
Statistics

Pekerjaan Ibu
N Valid 150
Missin
0
g

Pekerjaan Ibu

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Ibu Rumah
Tangga/Tidak 147 98,0 98,0 98,0
Kerja
Pegawai
1 ,7 ,7 98,7
Negeri Sipil
Swasta/
2 1,3 1,3 100,0
Wiraswasta
Total 150 100,0 100,0

Berdasarkan hasil penelitian terhadap pekerjaan ibu, responden ya

Frequencies
Statistics

Pendidikan Ibu
N Valid 150
Missin
0
g
 Pendidikan Ibu

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid SD 79 52,7 52,7 52,7
SMP 51 34,0 34,0 86,7
SMA 18 12,0 12,0 98,7
Perguruan
2 1,3 1,3 100,0
Tinggi
Total 150 100,0 100,0

Frequencies
Statistics

Jarak Rumah Ke Posyandu

N Valid 150
Missin
0
g

Jarak Rumah Ke Posyandu

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid < 500
94 62,7 62,7 62,7
Meter
>= 500
56 37,3 37,3 100,0
Meter
 Total 150 100,0 100,0

Frequencies
Statistics

Kunjungan Ke Posyandu
N Valid 150
Missin
0
g

Kunjungan Ke Posyandu

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid >= 6
83 55,3 55,3 55,3
kali/tahun
4-6
51 34,0 34,0 89,3
kali/tahun
<= 3
16 10,7 10,7 100,0
kali/tahun
Total 150 100,0 100,0
Frequencies
Statistics

Jenis Kelamin Balita

N Valid 150
Missin
0
g

Jenis Kelamin Balita

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Laki-Laki 79 52,7 52,7 52,7
Perempu
71 47,3 47,3 100,0
an
Total 150 100,0 100,0
Frequencies
Statistics

Status Gizi
N Valid 150
Missin
0
g

Status Gizi

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Kurus 13 8,7 8,7 8,7
Normal 137 91,3 91,3 100,0
Total 150 100,0 100,0
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Pekerjaan Ibu * Kunjungan
Ke Posyandu 150 100,0% 0 ,0% 150 100,0%
Pekerjaan Ibu * Status
Gizi 150 100,0% 0 ,0% 150 100,0%

Pekerjaan Ibu * Kunjungan Ke Posyandu

Crosstab

Kunjungan Ke Posyandu
>= 6 <= 3
kali/tahun 4-6 kali/tahun kali/tahun Total
Pekerjaan Ibu Ibu Rumah Count 81 51 15 147
Tangga/Tidak Kerja % within Pekerjaan
55,1% 34,7% 10,2% 100,0%
Ibu
Pegawai Negeri Count 1 0 0 1
Sipil % within Pekerjaan
100,0% ,0% ,0% 100,0%
Ibu
Swasta/Wiraswasta Count 1 0 1 2
% within Pekerjaan
50,0% ,0% 50,0% 100,0%
Ibu
Total Count 83 51 16 150
% within Pekerjaan
55,3% 34,0% 10,7% 100,0%
Ibu

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4,450(a) 4 ,349
Likelihood Ratio 4,123 4 ,390
Linear-by-Linear
,371 1 ,542
Association
N of Valid Cases
150
a 6 cells (66,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,11.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,170 ,349
N of Valid Cases 150
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
Pekerjaan Ibu * Status Gizi
Crosstab

Status Gizi
Kurus Normal Total
Pekerjaan Ibu Ibu Rumah Count 13 134 147
Tangga/Tidak Kerja % within Pekerjaan
8,8% 91,2% 100,0%
Ibu
Pegawai Negeri Count 0 1 1
Sipil % within Pekerjaan
,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Ibu
Swasta/Wiraswasta Count 0 2 2
% within Pekerjaan
,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Ibu
Total Count 13 137 150
% within Pekerjaan
8,7% 91,3% 100,0%
Ibu

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square ,290(a) 2 ,865
Likelihood Ratio ,550 2 ,760
Linear-by-Linear
,267 1 ,606
Association
N of Valid Cases
150
a 4 cells (66,7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,09.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,044 ,865
N of Valid Cases 150
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

Crosstabs
 Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Jarak Rumah Ke
Posyandu * Kunjungan 150 100,0% 0 ,0% 150 100,0%
Ke Posyandu
Jarak Rumah Ke
Posyandu * Status Gizi 150 100,0% 0 ,0% 150 100,0%

Jarak Rumah Ke Posyandu * Kunjungan Ke Posyandu

Crosstab

Kunjungan Ke Posyandu
>= 6 <= 3
kali/tahun 4-6 kali/tahun kali/tahun Total
Jarak Rumah Ke < 500 Meter Count 55 32 7 94
Posyandu % within Jarak
Rumah Ke 58,5% 34,0% 7,4% 100,0%
Posyandu
>= 500 Meter Count 28 19 9 56
% within Jarak
Rumah Ke 50,0% 33,9% 16,1% 100,0%
Posyandu
Total Count 83 51 16 150
% within Jarak
Rumah Ke 55,3% 34,0% 10,7% 100,0%
Posyandu

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig.
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2,907(a) 2 ,234
Likelihood Ratio 2,814 2 ,245
Linear-by-Linear
2,223 1 ,136
Association
N of Valid Cases
150
a 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5,97.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,138 ,234
N of Valid Cases 150
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
Jarak Rumah Ke Posyandu * Status Gizi
Crosstab
 Status Gizi
Kurus Normal Total
Jarak Rumah Ke < 500 Meter Count 9 85 94
Posyandu % within Jarak
Rumah Ke 9,6% 90,4% 100,0%
Posyandu
>= 500 Meter Count 4 52 56
% within Jarak
Rumah Ke 7,1% 92,9% 100,0%
Posyandu
Total Count 13 137 150
% within Jarak
Rumah Ke 8,7% 91,3% 100,0%
Posyandu

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,042 ,609
N of Valid Cases 150
a Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.