Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Options>Add ins > Go (found below) > Check analysis tool pack > Ok
SAMPLING SIZE
N 10000
n= 384.615385 385
e 0.05
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.15159629200226
R Square 0.02298143574884
Adjusted R Square -0.011912084403
Standard Error 0.65999957083919
Observations 30
ANOVA
df SS MS F
Regression 1 0.28689282 0.28689282 0.65861615
Residual 28 12.1967841 0.43559943
Total 29 12.483677
t-Test
t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances t-test Group 1 vs Group 2
ANNOVA
Compare Groups 1,2,3,4
SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Group 1 30 94.4841532 3.14947177 0.43047162
Group 2 30 92.8621648 3.09540549 0.43464184
Group 3 30 94.4281361 3.14760454 0.40585494
ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F
Between Groups 0.05651389457984 2 0.02825695 0.06669784
Within Groups 36.8580836320479 87 0.42365613
Total 36.9145975266277 89
Compare Year Levels
SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Year 1 10 30.3628941 3.03628941 0.33519465
Year 2 7 13.3572439 1.9081777 0.48650115
Year 3 7 21.1258922 3.01798461 0.2135592
Year 4 6 9.58210588 1.59701765 0.09907977
ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F
Between Groups 12.0873569216596 3 4.02911897 13.5827448
Within Groups 7.71251279726994 26 0.29663511
Total 19.7998697189295 29
Significance F
0.423894514
Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%
1.478184246 3.88676846 1.47818425 3.88676846
-0.229931162 0.53166573 -0.2299312 0.53166573
P-value F crit
0.935525613 3.10129576
P-value F crit
1.588562E-05 2.97515396
Sex Pretest Posttest Year 1 Year 2
1 367% 334% 334% 140%
1 279% 359% 359% 105%
1 296% 395% 395% 213%
1 342% 289% 289% 190%
1 177% 316% 316% 323%
1 307% 352% 352% 160%
1 371% 217% 217% 205%
1 166% 241% 241%
1 318% 246% 246%
1 367% 288% 288%
1 363% 340%
1 347% 305%
1 381% 213%
2 343% 190%
2 387% 323%
2 343% 360%
2 206% 405%
2 264% 254%
2 221% 311%
2 320% 322%
2 287% 374%
2 416% 335%
2 255% 262%
2 416% 256%
2 316% 293%
2 280% 330%
2 259% 281%
2 386% 390%
2 338% 426%
2 331% 439%
2.3
0.20981656
2
1
1.14921262
1.32068966
-1.3817149
0.23660849
3
1
4
69
30
0.42912305
Year 3 Year 4
254% 193%
311% 130%
322% 181%
374% 190%
335% 126%
262% 139%
256%
DATA 1
Mean Scores oer Variable
Sex VAR 1 VAR 2 VAR 3
0-Male 0 169% 100% 187%
1-Female 0 190% 133% 311%
0 198% 233% 117%
0 116% 267% 255%
0 210% 198% 244%
0 160% 228% 146%
0 223% 183% 216%
0 260% 176% 172%
0 186% 205% 94%
0 347% 100% 245%
0 247% 196% 128%
0 290% 162% 248%
0 152% 238% 227%
0 299% 159% 200%
0 197% 285% 194%
0 141% 288% 187%
1 221% 113% 167%
1 196% 142% 190%
1 237% 178% 235%
1 243% 199% 185%
1 212% 111% 240%
1 183% 239% 173%
1 249% 274% 234%
1 221% 244% 279%
1 224% 135% 204%
1 277% 191% 191%
1 186% 244% 168%
1 227% 192% 146%
1 166% 178% 169%
1 186% 239% 178%
DATA 3
Before After
SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Rich 12 38.3907735 3.1992311255 0.53391991
Middle Class 9 14.1562169 1.5729129925 0.13912333
Poor 11 24.9287492 2.2662499233 0.44157334
Very Poor 10 14.6846364 1.4684636407 0.09674609
ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value
Between Groups 20.919064 3 6.9730213436 21.5908452 2.4916E-08
Within Groups 12.2725539 38 0.3229619436
Total 33.1916179 41
DATA 2
APPLY t-test on DATA 3
Before After
Mean 1.97670199 3.14760454
Variance 0.23347805 0.40585494
Observations 30 30
Hypothesized Mean Diffe 0
df 54
t Stat -8.0208025
P(T<=t) one-tail 4.5656E-11
t Critical one-tail 1.67356491
P(T<=t) two-tail 9.1311E-11
t Critical two-tail 2.00487929
ITEM 3
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.4413644
R Square 0.19480253
Adjusted R Square 0.16604548
Standard Error 0.45376409
Observations 30
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 1.39479526 1.3947952599 6.77407849 0.01462326
Residual 28 5.76525167 0.2059018452
Total 29 7.16004693
ITEM 4
APPLY Pearson in Var 1 and Var 3 in DATA 1
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.13799751
R Square 0.01904331
Adjusted R Square -0.0159909
Standard Error 0.50084557
Observations 30
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 0.13635101 0.1363510067 0.54356399 0.46709309
Residual 28 7.02369592 0.2508462828
Total 29 7.16004693
VAR 1 2.21130847
Mean 2.11574527 2.16011677
Variance 0.39624418 0.09972729
Observations 16 13
Hypothesized Mean Diffe 0
df 23
t Stat -0.2463693
P(T<=t) one-tail 0.40379095
t Critical one-tail 1.71387153
P(T<=t) two-tail 0.8075819
t Critical two-tail 2.06865761
ITEM 6
N 137000
e 0.05
n ? 399
DATA 2
Mean Scores when group according to Economic Status
Rich Middle Class Poor Very Poor
381% 140% 217% 181%
343% 105% 241% 143%
387% 213% 246% 187%
343% 193% 288% 143%
206% 130% 340% 106%
264% 181% 305% 164%
221% 190% 213% 121%
320% 126% 190% 120%
287% 139% 190% 187%
416% 126% 116%
255% 139%
416%
DATA 3
Before After
187% 334%
311% 359%
117% 395%
255% 289%
244% 316%
146% 352%
216% 217%
172% 241%
94% 246%
245% 288%
128% 340%
248% 305%
227% 213%
200% 190% DATA 4
194% 323% N 137000
187% 360% e 0.05
167% 405% n ?
190% 254%
235% 311%
185% 322%
240% 374%
173% 335%
234% 262%
279% 256%
204% 293%
191% 330%
168% 281%
146% 390%
169% 426%
178% 439%
Rich
Mean
Standard Err
Median
Mode
Standard Dev
Sample Vari
Kurtosis
Skewness
Range
Minimum
Maximum
Sum
Count
DATA 4
N 137000
e 0.05
n ? 398.835517
Hypothsis
There is no significant difference between Rich, Middle Class, Poor, and very poor acc
F crit
2.85174134
Hypothesis
Hypothesis
gnificance F
Hypothesis
gnificance F
Mean
Standard Error
Median
Mode
Standard Deviation
Sample Variance
Kurtosis
Skewness
Range
Minimum
Maximum
Sum
Count
DATA 4
ccording to economic status
Formulate the Null Hypothesis Indicate Decision Interpret
Formulate the Null Hypothesis Indicate Decision Interpret
Formulate the Null Hypothesis Indicate Decision Interpret
Formulate the Null Hypothesis Indicate Decision Interpret
Formulate the Null Hypothesis Indicate Decision Interpret
DATA 2
Poor Very Poor
N
e 0.05
n ? 0