Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• Shape
• Constraints
• Applied loads
are usually different from those assumed in nominal structural models (beam, truss, plate,
rings, etc.)
Examples:
• Holes in beams, plates, disks
• Welding
• Keyholes
• Splines, threads
• Shoulders, fillets
• Shrink fits
• ….
It is common to heat the outer component (hub) to expand it beyond the interference and slip it over the
inner component (shaft)
Keys
Splines
key
conical
Approaches:
σ max
Nominal stress and notch factor Kt =
σ nom
Analytical method Numerical method Experimental method
Near notches:
• Nominal stress à calculated neglecting the presence of local overstress (De Saint
Venant)
• Real stress à real distribution of stresses
Real stress
Kσ = Kε = K t
8
< r = rA2 + 2C
= rA2 + 2C
S :
r =0
8 2
=0 <𝜎
> = r⇥ 1 ⇥
For 𝑟 → ∞ > !
r
2𝐶
2⇥
⇥2
= ⇥ 2
=2
0 + r ⇥r
:𝜎" = 0 ⇥2
r = r12
⇥
⇥
1
r ⇥ r⇥
For 𝑟 = 𝑎 𝜎! = 𝑆 𝐴 = 𝑆𝑎#
8 #
> 𝑎 ⇥2
< 𝜎! =r 𝑆=# r2 ⇥ 2 +
Finally, the solution for a plate with hole subject to 𝑟 ⇥2
=# ⇥ 2
internal pressure is: >
: 𝜎 = −S 𝑎 1 ⇥
" r = #
𝑟 r2 ⇥
S
For 𝑟 = 𝑎 𝜎! = 0
y 𝐴
r From the previous equation we obtain: 2𝐶 = − #
𝑎
S
𝜃
S
8 𝐴 𝐴 ⇥2
x >
< 𝜎! =r𝑟 #=− #r 2 ⇥ 2 +
1 ⇥
𝑎 ⇥2 r ⇥r
2a General = 𝐴⇥ 2
solution > 𝐴
:𝜎" = − + 1 ⇥ 1 ⇥2
: r 𝑟 # =𝑎 #r 2 ⇥ r ⇥r⇥
S
S S
y
r B S
A
𝜃
x
2a
2a
S
8 4 2
>
> a a
>
> ⇥r = S 1 + 3 4 4 2 sin 2
>
> r r
<
a4
> ⇥ = S 1 + 3 4 ) sin 2
>
> r
>
> 4 2
> a
: ⇥r = S 1 3 + 2 a
4 2
cos 2
r r
I
y Now, let us consider a plate subject to a
r
remote uniaxial stress S. We can see it as the
A
S !
II S superposition of two load cases.
B x The first one is the axisymmetric problem
previously solved (Case 1) the second one,
2a
instead, is the plate subjected to shear
stresses considering 𝜃 = 0 (Case 3).
0.5 S
0.5 S
0.5 S 0.5 S
+ 0.5 S 0.5 S
0.5 S 0.5 S
0.5 S 0.5 S
S
5
0. S
5
0.
0.5 S
⇡
✓= ✓=0
4
sin(2✓ + ⇡/2) = cos(2✓) cos(2✓ + ⇡/2) = sin(2✓)
Machine Design 2, Lesson 8
Plate with circular hole loaded by tension
Case 4
I
y
r 3
A !" / S
!
S II S !r / S
B x 2.5
2a
2
!"/ S, !r/ S
I-I path 1.5
✓ 2 4
◆
3 a a 1
r = S 2
2 r r4
✓ 2 4
◆
1 a a 0.5
= S 2+ 2 +3 4
2 r r
0
⇥r = 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
r/a
I
y
r 1
A
!" / S
! 0.8
S II S !r / S
B x
0.6
2a
0.4
0.2
!"/ S, !r / S
Ii path 0
−0.2
✓ 2 4
◆
1 a a
r = S 2 5 2 +3 4 −0.4
2 r r
✓ 2 ◆ −0.6
1 a a4
= S 2 3 4 −0.8
2 r r
−1
⇥r = 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
r/a
σ max
Kt =
σ nom
P
σ nom =
(H − d)h
i.e. evaluated over the net section
a
Kt ≅ 1 + 2
ρA
Sectioned femur
Architectural
‘spider’ bracket
2
• Resolution: • The mesh of • The software 1
8 µm/voxel the sample is Abaqus is used 0
Multiaxial
z
obtained by to study the Local stress
Failure
Failure
-1
3-Matic analyses -5
-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5
a,eq
/s -1
(a)
results in vertical
struts Figure 14: a) Equivalent stress amplitude in BCC and FCC
hydrostatic stress, (-) values: a(i),eq with negative hydrosta
Machine Design 2, Lesson 8 specimens: BCC5 tested at F = 1350N , N = 107 cycles, F
FCCL 9 tested at F = 1315N , N = 7.9 ⇥ 106 cycles. b) Eq
Machine Design 2, Lesson 8
Exercise: shaft with shoulder
40 mm
ε3
y
ε2
A
ε1
A
q
x
Using the equation expressing the strain value in each grid of rosette, we derive the 𝜀'' , 𝜀((
and 𝛾'( strain components
Bending Torsion
D/d = 1.25 Kt,b = 2.3 D/d = 1.25 Kt,t = 1.75
r/d = 0.025 r/D = 0.025