You are on page 1of 3

John Erick G. Sta.

Cruz

STRUCTURAL EXAMS:

1. Design Criteria:

f’Ɛ = 20.6 mpa


fy = 414 mpa
Loadings:
DL: Pin/Topping - 1.20 kpa
Ceiling/Utilities - 0.25 kpa
Partition - 0.50 kpa
LL: = 2.0 kpa

3 SLAB THK:
0
0 125 mm
0
B1

B2
3
0
0
B1

7000 7000 7000

B1 Design moment: 401.958 KN.m


Design beams B1 (300 x 500) and B2 (300 x 400) Design shear: 66.993 KN
flexure steel: 17-16mm dia. bottom bars
Check for flexure, shear and deflection. Stirrups: 500 mm O.C.
B2 Design moment: 126.077 KN.m
Assume pin support at columns.
Design shear: 108.066 KN
flexure steel: 6-16mm dia. bottom bars
Stirrups: 180mm O.C.
Note: see notes for solution
1400
1400
1400
2. 1400
2200
1

16
00

16
00 ½ L Strut

14000

Purlins spaced at 1000 mm center to center

Strut located at mid length of bottom chord

Questions:

1. What are the unbraced lengths for top chord 1; bottom chord 3 and web member 2.
Draw the elastic curve (neglect the weight of the structure)

1. P 2.

3.

P W
See sheets for
drawings

What can you say about the shear wall layout below in terms of structural point of view?

Shearwall Plan Shearwall Plan


Figure 1 Figure 2

Figure 1: wall arrangement confines the intersection Figure 2: wall arrangement highlights the
of the horizontal and vertical shear walls wherein the individual contribution of the shear wall on each
shear forces from opposite direction will have a corner since they have no interaction. No shear
twisting effect on this portion, therefore torsional force will be directly transferred from one wall to
effect may need to be considered in this area. If it the other due to openings on edges. Verify weak
can be avoided remove the intersection of the walls, story or any irregularities when needed.
otherwise we can arrange the bars in such a way
that it will act as a column that can withstand shear
from opposite direction and bi-axial loads.

You might also like