You are on page 1of 12

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.

Sci (2021) 10(01): 497-508

International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences


ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 10 Number 01 (2021)
Journal homepage: http://www.ijcmas.com

Original Research Article https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2021.1001.061

Design, Development and Evaluation of Manual Vegetable Transplanter

Kanakam Yaswanth Kumar*, V. Narendra Reddy, S. C. Moses,


R. N. Aalam and Sandeep Singh

Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, Vaugh Institute of Agricultural


Engineering and Technology (VIAET), Sam Higgin bottom University of Agriculture, Sciences
and Technology, (SHUATS) Prayagraj, (Uttar Pradesh), India
*Corresponding author

ABSTRACT

The present study was carried out during the year 2020 to design, development and
evaluation of manual vegetable transplanter on two different types of vegetable crops i.e.,
tomato and chilli. The manual vegetable transplanter consists of different components like
frame, wheels, supporting rod, furrow covering device, seedling stand, seedling delivery
Keywords tube, hopper, jaw opening pedal, handle and jaw mouth. The seedling delivery tube
Manual Vegetable penetrates into the soil by applying little force while holding with handle, seedling is
Transplanter, dropped into seedling delivery tube then the jaw is opened by pressing the pedal. The work
Vegetable crops demonstrates the application of engineering techniques to reduce the labour efforts and
time required for transplanting. The results obtained from the trial tests concluded that
Article Info transplanter functioned properly. The effective field capacity was 0.0057 ha/h for tomato
and effective field capacity for chilli is 0.0029 ha/h. Field efficiency was found to be 95%
Accepted: for tomato and 96.66% for chilli. The time to transplant a hectare by manual vegetable
07 December 2020 transplanter comes out to be 46.28 man-h/ha for tomato and 61.72 man-h/ha for chilli. The
Available Online: time and labour requirement to transplant a hectare by conventional method comes out to
10 January 2021 be 160 man-h/ha for tomato and chilli. Results revealed that the average saving of 66.25%
of time and labour over conventional method. The cost of operation for transplanting
tomato and chilli by manual vegetable transplanter were found to be 2168.51 Rs/ha and
2891.3 Rs/ha respectively and the cost of operation for transplanting tomato and chilli by
conventional method were found to be 5000 Rs/ha respectively. The cost of operation was
reduced with the developed prototype and saving in cost of operation was found to be
56.62% for tomato and 42.17% for chilli over conventional method.

Introduction self-employment to families who are engaged


in different aspects: crop-cultivation,
Vegetables play an important role in human harvesting, transporting, preparation for the
nutrition and vegetable production is market and selling for about 175 types of
essentially a small-farm venture that benefits vegetables. According to Horticultural
thousands of families in urban and rural areas. Statistics at a Glance-2020, total vegetable
Growing vegetables in the country, offers production in India in the year 2018-2019 was

497
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2021) 10(01): 497-508

183.17 million tonnes. It is estimated that the well-prepared seedbed, such that they start
per capita fruits and vegetables availability in establishing their roots and survive as a
India is less than 190 to 200 g per day, which separate plant. Seedlings for transplanting
is far below the recommended quantity of 230 purposes are raised on beds in which seeds
g per capita per day (Nandede et al., 2017). are broadcasted or dibbled in lines. According
On other side, growth in the vegetable and to the requirement of the procedure followed
fruit sectors offers considerable opportunities for transplanting of a particular crop or
for increased diversification of agricultural method. Seedling are then uprooted manually
income and nutrition in the future in Indian when they are about 4-10 weeks old and
farming conditions. The estimated demand of transplanted in fields. Transplanting of
vegetables in India by the end of 2020 is 220 seedling is a manual and labour-intensive
million metric tons and this can be achieved operation. Timely transplanting of vegetable
by increasing the area under vegetable crops is essential for higher yields.
cultivation and mechanised operation of
vegetable seedlings cultivation. In the past The farmers need a vegetable transplanter that
one decade, the change in cropping pattern is is simple in design, affordable and suitable for
more towards the horticulture sector and their farming conditions. Considering the
commercial crops. Presently at most of the small and fragmented holdings under
area is covered by hybrid seeds for vegetable vegetable crops and to avoid bending posture
cultivation, seeds are costly but gives higher in manual transplanting, it was considered
yield and quality produce. that manually operated vegetable transplanter
will be suitable for adoption in Indian
The development of Indian agriculture sector conditions.
depends on the development of farm
machinery. There is need of cheap and easily Shaw (1997) developed an automatic
available farm machinery to reduce human transplanting vegetable machine with the
efforts and the product damage. The available transplanting rate of 7000 plants per hour per
vegetable transplanter is expensive for the row unit and tested it in a greenhouse for both
small-scale farmer; therefore, these farmers tomato and pepper seedling into bare ground
use traditional methods of vegetable with plastic mulch and it was found that on a
transplanting. In India most of the farmers regular basis, the machine resulted in 98% of
doing transplanting operation of vegetables good quality seedling from a tray and
with traditional methods, that methods regularly removes all of the seedlings from
include all operation such as making holes in the tray. This machine was designed for 7 to 8
mulching paper, dugout pits on bed and inches total length seedlings and however
transplant seedling in each hole are done some difficulties were observed with plants
manually. This method of transplanting is over 9 to 10 inches in length.
time consuming and need maximum labour
input, sometime there is lack of availability of Vinay Kumar et al., (2018) developed the
labour. The unavailability of labour, cause single row manual vegetable transplanter on
delay in transplanting operation which three different types of vegetable crops i.e.,
directly affects crop production and economic brinjal, chilli and tomato at two different sites
condition of the farmer. and compare it with traditional method of
transplanting. The effective field capacity was
Transplanting is practice which involves the 52.36 per cent superior over conventional
placing of seedlings either on the ridge or method of transplanting. Field efficiency was

498
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2021) 10(01): 497-508

found to be 91.34 and 90.63 per cent with per plant, plant mortality, yield, seedling
vegetable transplanter and conventional missing, and leaf area were found more by
method respectively. Labour requirement and machine transplanting while plant population,
cost of operation were also extremely reduced planting depth were found less by machine
compared to traditional method of transplanting. Time saving, labour saving,
transplanting and results revealed average lower cost of operation was observed in
saving of 52.83 per cent of time and labour machine transplanting as compared to manual
over traditional method. In agriculture, transplanting.
transplanting is one of the important labour-
intensive activity and adoption of the single Manjuath Pai et al., (2016) developed the
row manual vegetable transplanter in the Semi-Automatic Vegetable Planting Machine.
present study increased not only efficiency This planter machine has considerable
but cost of operation was also reduced by potential to greatly increase productivity. The
reducing labour engagement during main task now is to promote this technology
transplanting. and have available to farmers at an affordable
price. The Planter machine can be readily
Arjya et al., (2018) developed the Bullock made from local components in workshops.
Drawn Vegetable Transplanter. The machine By using of this machine, achievement of
was evaluated in the field condition with a flexibility of distance and depth variation for
pair of bullocks using bare root seedlings of different seed plantation is possible.
brinjal and chilli of 10- 12% moisture content.
From the field studies the average depth of Materials and Methods
planting brinjal and chilli was found to be 58-
60 cm. The plant stand and plant mortality The present investigation entitled “Design,
after 21 days of transplanting was found to be Development and Evaluation of Manual
70.78-72.76 % and 21.66- 25.66 % Vegetable Transplanter” was developed in the
respectively. The tray type metering workshop of Sam Higginbottom University of
mechanism maintained a plant to plant Agriculture, Technology and Sciences,
spacing of 525 mm. Draft developed by the Prayagraj, U.P. The chapter deals with
vegetable transplanter was 21 kgf. The field various materials and methods used in the
capacity and field efficiency of the developed experiments under following:
transplanter was 0.052 ha/h and 72.20%
respectively. 1. Experimental setup of manual
vegetable transplanter
Anuj et al., (2018) conducted an experiment 2. Design considerations of manual
to evaluate the performance of semi- vegetable transplanter
automatic vegetable transplanter and compare 3. Performance evaluation of manual
it with the traditional system of manual vegetable transplanter
transplanting. The two-row vegetable
transplanter was evaluated in the field for Experimental setup of manual vegetable
brinjal and chillies and compared with the transplanter
manual transplanting of bare root seedling
and study evaluation of transplanter revealed Keeping in view the design specifications, a
that field capacity of transplanter was 0.09- prototype of manual vegetable transplanter
0.12ha/h with field efficiency of 64 to 75%. was fabricated in the workshop of SHUATS
The average plant height, number of branches using locally available materials (Fig. 1–4;

499
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2021) 10(01): 497-508

Table 1-3). comfort and safety of operators.


Design considerations
The main components of the vegetable
The following design considerations have transplanter are given below:
been considered in mind while developing the
prototype: Frame

Simple in fabrication with locally available Wheels


materials and easy to use Frame
Able to transplant vegetable seedlings in Seedling tray mounted on the frame
standing posture Supporting rod
Farmer friendly, the safety of the operator Furrow covering device
Able to transplant seedling of different
vegetable crops Planting device
Minimal force requirement for penetration
into the soil surface Seedling delivery tube
Easy to operate both male and female can be Hopper
operated Handle
Jaw opening lever (pedal)
Design of manual equipment depends on Jaw (Opening mouth)
many factors like mode of operation,
anthropometric data of user population, Wheels
material and shape of equipment. Research
has shown that there are anthropometric The wheels are manufactured with 3.5 cm
differences between different populations in width of steel bar with thickness 3 mm. The
almost every part of the human body. diameter of the wheel is 30 cm. Lugs on
wheels to resist sliding action and due to self-
Based on the conceptual view of the manual cleaning property, 2 cm height of lugs was
vegetable transplanter, functional attached to four wheels. The diameter of the
requirement, the anthropometric data of the wheel including lugs was 34 cm.
user populations of Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh
(Ahmed Merza Abood et al., 2015) and taking Frame
into consideration of the specification of
nursery seedlings of different vegetable crops The frame which is suitable to push the total
such as tomato and chilli, the prototype was equipment and balance the total loads in
developed. The specifications of the seedlings equipment. The frame is constructed with L-
taken into consideration for design of shaped bar with thickness of 3 mm and width
prototype. of 3.5 cm. The total length of the frame is 4.3
feet. The frame consists of a handle which
Improved equipment plays an important role helped to hold tight and give maximum
in farm mechanization of a country. support to push equipment.
Compatibility between size and physical
strength of the users, design and dimensions Seedling tray mounted on the frame
of farm tools and equipment is essential to
achieve enhanced performance and efficiency The seedling frame is used to place the
of man-equipment system along with better seedling tray. The height of the seedling

500
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2021) 10(01): 497-508

frame is 52 cm, width of the seedling frame is it was also provided with a hopper so that it is
71 cm. Height of the seedling frame from the easy for seedling to go inside the delivery
ground was 115.5 cm. The seedling frame tube without any interruption and damage to
holds the 4 seedling trays and rotates 3600 by the leaves of the seedlings from the upper
using 45 mm bearings. edge of the feeding pipe of transplanter.

Supporting rod Height of handle of vegetable transplanter


from ground
Seedling frame is mounted on the supporting
square rod, the diameter of the square pipe For manually operated implements, the
was 45 mm and length of the square pipe is 3 handle is one of most important components
feet. One end of the supporting rod is attached with which the operator controls and guides
to frame and another end is attached to the implements properly during field
seedling frame. The seedling delivery operations and the height of the handle of the
mechanism is attached by four bars from the transplanter from the ground should be
supporting rod. designed such that during operation the
operator stands erect as far as possible to
Furrow covering device reduce musculoskeletal discomfort
(Dewangan et al., 2008).
The covering device of manually operated
vegetable transplanter was designed The height of the handle from ground was
adjustable. It was designed to allow for proper determined as 87 cm and made up of MS
covering of the soil over the seedlings in the pipe.
furrows. The length of the furrow covering
device is 22 cm, width is 22 cm and Handle width
adjustable height is 10 cm.
It is used to hold and penetrate the jaw in the
Seedling delivery tube soil bed. For maximum work efficiency, hand
positioning should be such that both hands are
The dimension of seedling plays vital role to close to their neutral position. Thus, handle
decide the diameter of seedling tube, height of width depends on elbow- elbow breadth.
jaw and apex angle. Canopy of seedling is Taking a clearance of 87 cm on each side, the
considered to decide the diameter of seedling recommended handle width was 54 cm. The
delivery tube. The average size of canopy is recommended grip diameter was determined
required to avoid clogging in hollow pipe. as 2.5 cm.
The height of seedling should not me more
than 20 cm and seedling age from 30-40 days Size of jaw mouth
is preferable as the height at this stage ranges
from 10-15 cm (Malunjkar et al., 2014). The size of jaw mouth depends on the
required depth of transplanting of the
For seed delivery tube, polyvinyl chloride different vegetable seedlings.
(PVC) pipe is selected due to its light weight,
easy availability and its cheapness. The The required depth for transplanting is 3 to 5
diameter of tube was selected 7 cm on the cm for the vegetable seedlings therefore, the
basis of dimension of average canopy of size of jaw mouth is taken as 20 cmso that
seedlings which ranged from 21 to 53 mmand jaw could easily penetrate into the soil surface

501
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2021) 10(01): 497-508

up to 5 cm depth. theoretical time taken


Apex angle
Theoretical Field Capacity =
The apex angle (ϴ) is inclined angle formed
by the two edges between the jaw and jaw W = Width of operation (m)
opener, according to Singh (1998). It ranges S = Speed (km/h)
between 36o to 60o for proper penetration of
implement into the soil; therefore, apex angle Actual field capacity was calculated based on
of jaw was taken as 60ofor easy penetration area covered and actual time taken for
without much efforts. The apex angle was covering the area including the time lost in
found by using the angle protractor. turning, rest and talk.

Actual Field Capacity =


Performance evaluation of manual
(ha/h).
vegetable transplanter
Field efficiency
Working principle of the manual vegetable
transplanter Field efficiency was obtained by dividing
actual field capacity by the theoretical field
The main working principle of manual capacity.
vegetable transplanter is pedal operated. This
prototype has simple mechanism; the jaw is Field efficiency = × 100
operated with pedal which is connected by
spring. The prototype in held position with as Refilling time
the jaw penetrate into soil bed, pick up one
seedling and drop into seedling delivery tube, Time taken to refill the seedling tray mounted
then push the pedal downside and the action on the frame of equipment.
of pedal opens the jaw inside the soil, at that
condition seedling is drop into the pit. Now Turning losses
pick up the implement in the same position
(jaw in open position), the outermost soil Time taken to place the equipment from one
from jaw comes towards the root zone of row to another row to planting.
seedling, then the jaw closer covers the
seedling with the soil partially. Then the Labour requirement
furrow closer will covers the seedling with
Skilled labour (man power) required to
soil.
operate the vegetable planter viz., operating
the planter, placing seedling tray, shifting the
Field capacity
machine from one row to another row.
Field efficiency
Refilling time No. of plants per meter length
Turning losses
Labour requirement The total number of plants were recorded per
No. of plants per sq. m meter length with the help of measuring tape.

Field capacity Results and Discussion

Theoretical field capacity was calculated The chapter deals with the results of the study
based on the speed of operation and which has been conducted in two phases. In

502
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2021) 10(01): 497-508

the first phase, a manual vegetable provide comfortable working posture.


transplanter was designed and developed. In The design and fabrication of prototype of
the second phase, the developed prototype manual vegetable transplanter was based on
was evaluated in the field with the different the two main factor.
types of vegetable crops i.e., tomato and
chilliat SHUATS, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh, Specifications of seedling
during November, 2020 to determine its
performance under actual field conditions. On the basis of the canopy (floral spread) of
The results obtained during the course of the seedlings, the diameter of the seedling
these investigations are presented and delivery tube was decided.
discussed under the following sub heads.
On the basis of the height of the seedlings the
Experimental setup of manual vegetable size of the jaw mouth was decided.
transplanter
Design considerations of manual vegetable Performance evaluation of manual
transplanter vegetable transplanter
Performance evaluation of manual vegetable
transplanter Field capacity

Experimental setup of manual vegetable The average effective field capacity for
transplanter transplanting tomato and chilli with
developed vegetable transplanter was 0.0057
The field evaluation of the manual vegetable ha/h and 0.0029 ha/h. The lower field
transplanter was carried out in the field at capacity in case of chilli was due to higher
SHUATS, Allahabad. plant population per unit area as compared to
tomato. The mean effective field capacity was
Design considerations of manual vegetable 49.12% higher over chilli.
transplanter
Field efficiency
The review of the literature revealed that the
main problem with traditional method of The average field efficiency for transplanting
transplanting was that the farmers have to tomato and chilli with developed vegetable
work with their hands and there was lot of transplanter was 95% and 96.66%,
fatigue involved in it along with the respectively.
occupational health hazards and the posture
adopted during the operation was also not The lowest average field efficiency was found
proper and lead to occupational health in case of tomato with developed transplanter
problems. Transplanting with tradition due to its larger floral spread (Canopy) and
method in strenuous posture also causes the seedlings of the tomato crop were more
severe pain in shoulders, upper back, hands delicate therefore required more caring while
and fingers. transplanting.

The design of the equipment was based on the Higher field efficiency was found in case of
idea that it should relieve farmers from back chilli crop with developed vegetable
pain and eliminate continuous sitting posture transplanter. However, the efficiency can be
by employing standing posture to increases increased with more skillful operators.
the work efficiency, reduce drudgery and
503
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2021) 10(01): 497-508

man-h/ha for tomato and chilli.


Refilling time No. of plants per meter length

The time taken to replace the empty tray with The number of plants planted in the square
the seedling tray. meter area is 4.4 for tomato and 12 for chilli.

Crops R1 (sec) R2 (sec) R3 (sec) Avg (sec) In conclusion the results obtained in the
Tomato 8 10 9 9 present study on the design, development and
Chilli 10 11 9 10 evaluation of manual vegetable transplanter
on different types of vegetable crops i.e.,
The maximum refilling time is 10 sec, tomato and chilli at SHUATS, Allahabad,
minimum is 8 sec and average is 9 sec were Uttar Pradesh during November, 2020 to
observed in the planting of tomato seedlings. determine its performance under actual field
conditions are summarized below:
The maximum refilling time is 11 sec,
minimum is 9sec and average is 10 sec were The present study was carried out in two
observed in the planting of chilli seedlings. phases. In the first phase, a manual vegetable
transplanter was designed and developed in
Turning losses the workshop of SHUATS. In the second
phase, the developed prototype was evaluated
The loss of time during the field operation in the field on vegetable crops tomato and
while working on borders to turn the chilliat SHUATS-Allahabad. The prototype
equipment one row to another row. was design on the basis of conceptual design,
specification of the seedlings and
Crops R1 (sec) R2 (sec) R3 (sec) Avg (sec) anthropometry data of the user’s population
of Allahabad (Ahmed Merza Abood et al.,
Tomato 8 10 12 10
2015). The anthropometric data of farm
Chilli 10 12 11 11
workers of the region were considered
essential for design and development of
The maximum turning loss is 12 sec, manual vegetable transplanter.
minimum is 8 sec and average is 10 sec were
observed in the planting of tomato seedlings. The main working principle of manual
The maximum turning loss is 12 sec, vegetable transplanter was pedal operated.
minimum is 10 sec and average is 11 sec were This prototype has simple mechanism; the
observed in the planting of chilli seedlings. jaw was operated with pedal which was
connected by spring. The prototype in held
Labor requirement position with handle as the jaw penetrate into
soil bed, pickup one seedling and drop into
The time and labor requirement has been seedling delivery tube, then push the pedal
considerably reduced by use of developed downside and the action of pedal opens the
vegetable transplanter and it was seen that the jaw inside the soil, at that condition seedling
average time required to transplant a hectare is drop into the pit. Now pick up the
area by developed vegetable transplanter implement in the same position (jaw in open
found to be 46.28 man-h/ha for tomato and position), the outermost soil from the jaw
61.72 man-h/ha for chilli. The time and labour comes towards the root zone of seedling, then
requirement to transplant a hectare by the jaw closer covers the seedling with the
conventional method comes out to be 160 soil partially. Then the furrow closer will
504
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2021) 10(01): 497-508

covers the seedling with soil.


Table.1 Seedling parameters of the vegetable crops

Parameters Names of vegetables


Tomato Chilli
Age of seedlings (days) 35 35
Leaf stage (No. of leaves) 4-6 3-5
Floral spread cm (Mean) 5.28 2.13
No of plants/meter length 2.2 3.3
Mean seedling height (cm) 4.85 3.35
Mean seedling diameter (mm) 1.7 1.1
Row to row distance (cm) 60 45
Plant to plant distance (cm) 45 30
Variety of vegetable Heemsona Shimla

Table.2 Specification of manual vegetable transplanter

S. no. Description Dimensions (mm) Material used


1. Seedling delivery tube 600 PVC pipe
2. Hopper diameter 70 PVC pipe
3. Handle height 870 MS pipe
4. Jaw mouth length 200 MS flat
5. Apex angle 60o -

Table.3 Field performance of manual vegetable transplanter

Parameters Transplanter
Tomato Chilli
Theoretical field capacity (ha/h) 0.006 0.003
Effective field capacity (ha/h) 0.0057 0.0029
Field efficiency (%) 95 96.66
Labour requirement (man-h/ha) 46.28 61.72
Cost of operation (Rs/ha) 2168.51 2891.3

505
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2021) 10(01): 497-508

Fig.1 View of developed manual vegetable transplanter

Fig.2 Graphical representation of Field Capacity for tomato and chilli

Fig.3 Graphical representation of Field Efficiency for tomato and chilli

506
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2021) 10(01): 497-508

Fig.4 View of evaluation of manual vegetable transplanter at field

The field evaluation of the manual vegetable automatic vegetable transplanter.


transplanter was carried out in the field at It is very suitable for some plants which need
SHUATS, Allahabad. Field capacity and field plastic film mulching.
efficiency of the developed transplanter was Easy operation.
evaluated in the field. Mean effective field
capacity was found to be 0.0043 ha/hwith Acknowledgment
manual vegetable transplanter respectively.
The effective field capacity was 0.0057 ha/h The author is thankful to Assistant Professor.
for tomato and effective field capacity for Dr. S. C. Moses, Department of Farm
chilli is 0.0029 ha/h. Field efficiency was Machinery and Power Engineering, Vaugh
found to be 95% for tomato and 96.66% for Institute of Agricultural Engineering and
chilli. Technology (VIAET), Sam Higginbottom
University of Agriculture, Sciences and
It can be used for transplanting many Technology, (SHUATS) Allahabad, (Uttar
vegetable crops such as tomato, brinjal, Pradesh).
cabbage, chilli, cucumber etc.
Vegetable seedling transplanter machine References
made transplanting seedling easier,
faster and used less manpower. Anuj Kumar Rai., Ashok Tripathi., Akash
Vegetable seedling transplanter machine Agarwal., Ranjan Kumar Nirla.,
made transplanting seedling easier and Himanshu Raj. and Rohit Kumar
used less manpower. Pandey. 2018. Evaluation and
It is used for small plots and small fields. performance of two row semi-
You can stand straight when seeding, no need automatic vegetable transplanter.
to bend over and save much energy. International Journal of Chemical
There is no damaged to seedling and Studies 4: 125-127.
negligible missing rate compared with Arjya, U.S., Markandeya, M., Sangramkesari,

507
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2021) 10(01): 497-508

S. and Debraj, B. 2018. Development Planting Machine. National


and Evaluation of a Bullock Drawn Conference on Advances in
Vegetable Transplanter. International Mechanical Engineering Science:
Journal of Microbiology and Applied 199-202.
Sciences 7: 1584-1589. Vinay Kumar and Jagvir Dixit. 2018. Design,
Lawrange, N. S. 1997. Automatic Development and Fabrication of a
Transplanter for Vegetables: 262-263. Single Row Manual Vegetable
Manjuath, P., Sandesh, S., Chaitra, K., Transplanter. Indian Journal of Hill
Chaithanya and Sandeep, S. 2016. A Farming 31(1): 177-182.
Study on Semi-Automatic Vegetable

How to cite this article:

Kanakam Yaswanth Kumar, V. Narendra Reddy, S. C. Moses, R. N. Aalam and Sandeep


Singh. 2021. Design, Development and Evaluation of Manual Vegetable Transplanter.
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 10(01): 497-508. doi: https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2021.1001.061

508

You might also like