You are on page 1of 23

R epublic of the P hilippines

Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of City Schools
MANILA

PERFO RMANCE IMPRO VEMENT O F STUDENTS AT RISK O F DRO PPING O UT (SARDO )


THRO UGH INTERG RATIVE ASSESSMENT INTERVENTIO N PRO G RAM

DIVINA BATIN
Researcher

G ENE T. PANG ILINAN


Principal

RAMO N MAG SAYSAY HIG H SCHOO L

May 2023

MA NILA EDUCA TIO N CENTER, Arroceros Forest Park


G at Antonio J. Villegas St., Erm ita, Manila, 1000
☎ 8527-2315 • 8527-5184 • 8527 -5180
www.depedm anila.net
sdo.m anila@deped.gov.ph
R epublic of the P hilippines
Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of City Schools
MANILA

ABSTRACT

On the process of en suring that no learner will be left behind, ‘Integrative


Assessm ent Intervention Program ’ was developed as one of the ‘Alternative D elivery
Mode’ (ADM) innovations to address cases of students dropping out from schools. ADMs
are innovations geared to m ake the school system an all -encom passing and flexible space
for all learners, especially for those who are at risk of dropping out. This paper carried out
the facilitation of the Integrative Assessm ent Intervention Pro gram acros s 8 subjects with
focus on students identified at risk of dropping out and to a scertain the im provem ent of
their academ ic perform ance before and after the 'Integrative Assessm ent Intervention
Program '. The study revealed that the academ ic perform ance of th e students at risk has
significantly im proved with the application ‘Integrative Assessm ent Intervention Pro gra m ’ at
a fair level. It was believed that using such intervention program s will serve as fe asible
assessm ent tool that is bound to be optim ized in the teaching and learning process and
the gains that can be obtained from the facilitation of these instructional opportunities are
expected to positively im pact the academ ic perform ance of learners.

Keywords: School Dropout, Intervention Pro gram s, Teaching Style

MA NILA EDUCA TIO N CENTER, Arroceros Forest Park


G at Antonio J. Villegas St., Erm ita, Manila, 1000
☎ 8527-2315 • 8527-5184 • 8527 -5180
www.depedm anila.net
sdo.m anila@deped.gov.ph
R epublic of the P hilippines
Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of City Schools
MANILA

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The researcher would like to give due acknowledgement to a number of individuals who
have shown their support on the conduct and completion of this paper.

To my adviser, Mr. ________________, thank you for the untiring mentorship and guidance
on the formation and implementation of this research,

To my fellow school teachers, much appreciation goes out for sharing your knowledge and
resources, and full cooperation.

To our School Principal, Mr. _____________, my sincerest gratitude for your utmost support
and words of encouragement towards the overall conduct of this study.

MA NILA EDUCA TIO N CENTER, Arroceros Forest Park


G at Antonio J. Villegas St., Erm ita, Manila, 1000
☎ 8527-2315 • 8527-5184 • 8527 -5180
www.depedm anila.net
sdo.m anila@deped.gov.ph
R epublic of the P hilippines
Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of City Schools
MANILA

I. CONTEXT AND RATIONALE

The current emergency health crisis across the globe brought about by the Covid -19

pandemic has greatly affected the world’s economies and the educational sector was no exemption.

The national government and the educational sector have worked collectively in initiating measures

to ensure uninterrupted delivery of educational programs and instruction amidst the pandemic to

guarantee that no learner will be left behind and in adherence to the Education for All (EFA)

initiative of the Department of Education.

To ensure that no learner will be left behind, ‘Integrative Assessment Intervention Program’

was developed as one of the ‘Alternative D elivery Mode’ (ADM) innovations to address cases of

students dropping out from schools. ADMs are innovations geared to make the school system an

all-encompassing and flexible space for all learners, especially for those who are at risk of dropping

out, residing in far-flung areas, students in overfilled learning spaces, or having difficulty coping with

school activities and curricular requirements (Sharma et al., 2019).

The Department of Education (DepEd) devised the term ‘Student -At-Risk of Dropping Out’ or

commonly known as SARDO, which pertains to a student who is likely to become drop out from

school. The Integrative Assessment Intervention Program is carried out through a collaborative

effort and active engagement between and among teachers, students, and parents. Thorough

assessment related to cognitive, affective, and psychomotor aspects of students can be provided

comprehensively through different perspectives, namely cognitive assessment by teachers, affective

assessment by students (self-assessment), and psychomotor assessment by parents. The results of

this integrated assessment are accrued into the final grade of students’ report.

MA NILA EDUCA TIO N CENTER, Arroceros Forest Park


G at Antonio J. Villegas St., Erm ita, Manila, 1000
☎ 8527-2315 • 8527-5184 • 8527 -5180
www.depedm anila.net
sdo.m anila@deped.gov.ph
R epublic of the P hilippines
Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of City Schools
MANILA

In the light of the foregoing discussion, the researcher was prompted to undertake a study

pertinent to the performance improvement of Students at risk of Dropping Out (SARDO) through the

use of Integrative Assessment (F2F) Intervention Program among Grade 10 students at Ramon

Magsaysay High School.

This study is relevant as it seeks to ascertain the level of improvement of students' academic

performance with the application of Integrative Assessment (F2F) Intervention Program . More data

is necessary to allow school administrators, parents, and stakeholders to understand if the use of

intervention program provides parity of learning in classroom instruction and to carry on in

formulating practical educational plans that will ensure the attainment of acceptable level of

students' academic performance.

The findings and reflections of this study will be significant to the fol lowing:

School Teachers . This study will furnish school teachers relevant information on Integrative

Assessment (F2F) Intervention Program . It will provide salient points of information on their teaching

methods and challenges encountered in classroom instruction and assessment of learners.

Students. Findings of this study will help students reflect on their preparedness to adapt

with the intervention programs being used in the teaching and learning process. to help them

achieve improved academic performanc e.

School Adm inistrators . This study will provide school administrators key insights as to the

implementation of Integrative Assessment (F2F) Intervention Program . Findings of the study will

serve as a focal point in strengthening educational plans and de vising additional schemes to ensure

MA NILA EDUCA TIO N CENTER, Arroceros Forest Park


G at Antonio J. Villegas St., Erm ita, Manila, 1000
☎ 8527-2315 • 8527-5184 • 8527 -5180
www.depedm anila.net
sdo.m anila@deped.gov.ph
R epublic of the P hilippines
Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of City Schools
MANILA

that such intervention programs remain relevant in the process of assessing and improving

students' academic performance.

II. RESEARCH QUESTIONS

The main thrust of this study is to explore the performance improvement of Students at Risk

of Dropping Out (SARDO) through the use of Integrative Assessment (F2F) Intervention Program

among Grade 10 students at Ramon Magsaysay High School.

1. Is there an increase in the performance of the students in reference to their obtained test results

after the Integrative Assessment Intervention Program?

2. What improvements can be instituted to improve the Integrative Assessment Intervention

Program?

III. SCOPE AND LIMITATION

This study encompassed the academic performance of students ide ntified at risk of dropping

out (SARDO). Central to the scope is the application of Integrative Assessment Intervention

Program.

The study is lim ited to grade 10 students and 7 school teachers of Ramon Magsaysay High

School.

MA NILA EDUCA TIO N CENTER, Arroceros Forest Park


G at Antonio J. Villegas St., Erm ita, Manila, 1000
☎ 8527-2315 • 8527-5184 • 8527 -5180
www.depedm anila.net
sdo.m anila@deped.gov.ph
R epublic of the P hilippines
Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of City Schools
MANILA

IV. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

A. Sam pling/Sources of Data

The present study will be conducted at Ramon Magsaysay High School. It is a Department

of Education (DepEd)- recognized educational institution offering Basic Education programs.

The respondents of the study will be comprised of school teachers and students. The

teacher-respondents will include seven (7) school teachers. The student -respondents will be

purposively selected across the 7 sections of Grade 10 with a total of 54 Students at Risk of

Dropping Out (SARDO). The latter refer to students who will obtain failing grades during the first and

second quarters of the academic year.

B. Data Collection

Gathering Procedure

The study will make use of Integrative Assessment material provided by the ADM, which will

be utilized for the eight (8) subjects which include Filipino, English, Mathematics, Science, Araling

Panlipunan, ESP, THE/ TLE, and MAPEH (i.e., Music, Arts, Physical Education, Health).

The researcher will undertake the following steps in the gathering of data needed f or the

study:

1. Preparation and approval of a permission letter to conduct the action research

subject to approval of the School Principal of the locale of the study.

2. Scrutiny and validation of the ‘Integrative Assessment’ material that will be used to

assess students.

3. Checking and consolidation of outputs and/or activities submitted by students.

4. Administration of the assessment instrument to the students in a face -to-face set up.

MA NILA EDUCA TIO N CENTER, Arroceros Forest Park


G at Antonio J. Villegas St., Erm ita, Manila, 1000
☎ 8527-2315 • 8527-5184 • 8527 -5180
www.depedm anila.net
sdo.m anila@deped.gov.ph
R epublic of the P hilippines
Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of City Schools
MANILA

5. Retrieval of the assessment instruments from the students following a designate d

timeline. After retrieval of research instruments, interpretation and analysis of data

obtained followed.

Statistical Treatment of Data

The data were treated and reported through tabular presentation and the quantitative

method that was utilized in analyzing the data was the frequency and percentage distribution.

C. Ethical Issues

The researcher ensured the respondents' right to self -determination, anonymity and

confidentiality. This study was conducted in accordance to the Data Privacy Act. For this re ason, the

respondents was given complete information on the nature of the study through a written informed

consent which was distributed along with the questionnaire. The data collected from the

respondents were kept confidential. The names of the particip ants was not recorded, whatsoever

and whatever data that were rendered.

MA NILA EDUCA TIO N CENTER, Arroceros Forest Park


G at Antonio J. Villegas St., Erm ita, Manila, 1000
☎ 8527-2315 • 8527-5184 • 8527 -5180
www.depedm anila.net
sdo.m anila@deped.gov.ph
R epublic of the P hilippines
Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of City Schools
MANILA

DISCUSSIO N OF FINDING S/RESULTS AND RECO MMENDATIO NS

V. Results and Discussions

Table 1

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Students' Performance

in Filipino subject

Before IA After IA
Range
F % F %
70-71 3 8% 0 0%
72-73 13 35% 0 0%
74-75 13 35% 16 43%
76-77 6 16% 19 51%
78-79 1 3% 1 3%
80 and above 1 3% 1 3%
TOTAL 37 100% 37 100%

Table 1 presents the frequency and percentage distribution o f students' performance in

Filipino before and after the administration of integrative assessment intervention program (IAIP).

It can de deduced from Table 1 that before the integrative assessment, majority or 70% of

the 37 students identified at risk of dropping out has an obtained average of between 72 -73 and 74-

75 during the 1st and 2nd grading period. Three or 8% of the students falling in the lowest average

range of 70-71. After the conduct of the integrative assessment, 19 representing 51% of the

students obtained an average range of 76 -77. None of the students obtained average range

between 70-71 and 72-73, respectively. These figures implied that the application of integrative

assessment has improved the academic performance of students identified a t risk of dropping out in

Filipino subject.

MA NILA EDUCA TIO N CENTER, Arroceros Forest Park


G at Antonio J. Villegas St., Erm ita, Manila, 1000
☎ 8527-2315 • 8527-5184 • 8527 -5180
www.depedm anila.net
sdo.m anila@deped.gov.ph
R epublic of the P hilippines
Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of City Schools
MANILA

Table 2

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Students' Performance

in English Subject

Before IA After IA
Range
F % F %
70-71 12 29% 0 0%
72-73 13 32% 0 0%
74-75 12 29% 23 56%
76-77 2 5% 14 34%
78-79 2 5% 4 10%
80 and above 0 0% 0 0%
TOTAL 41 100% 41 100%

Table 2 presents the frequency and percentage distribution of students' performance in

English before and after the conduct of integrative assessment intervention program (IAIP).

As shown in Table 2, before the integrative assessment, 13 representing 32% of the 41

students identified at risk of dropping out has an obtained average of between 72 -73 during the 1st

and 2nd grading period. Twelve or 29% of the students falling in the lowest average range between

70-71. After the conduct of the integrative assessment, majority or 56% of the students obtained an

average range between 74 -75. None of the students obtained average range between 70 -71 and

72-73, respectively. It can be inferred from these figures that the application of integrative

assessment has enhanced the academic performance of students identified at risk of dropping out

in English subject.

MA NILA EDUCA TIO N CENTER, Arroceros Forest Park


G at Antonio J. Villegas St., Erm ita, Manila, 1000
☎ 8527-2315 • 8527-5184 • 8527 -5180
www.depedm anila.net
sdo.m anila@deped.gov.ph
R epublic of the P hilippines
Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of City Schools
MANILA

Table 3

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Students' Performance in

Mathematics Subject

Before IA After IA
Range
F % F %
70-71 12 27% 0 0%
72-73 18 39% 0 0%
74-75 14 30% 39 85%
76-77 2 4% 4 9%
78-79 0 0% 2 4%
80 and above 0 0% 1 2%
TOTAL 46 100% 46 100%

Table 3 presents the frequency and percentage distribu tion of students' performance in

Mathematics before and after the application of integrative assessment intervention program (IAIP).

Table 3 revealed that before the integrative assessment, majority or 39% of the 46 students

identified at risk of dropping out has an obtained the second lowest average range of 72 -73 during

the 1st and 2nd grading period. Twelve representing 27% of the students falling in the lowest

average range of obtained an average range between 74 -75. After the integrative assessment, 39

representing 85% of the students obtained an average range of 74 -75. None of the students

obtained average range between 70 -71 and 72-73, respectively. These figures implied that the use

of integrative assessment has improved the academic performance of students identified at risk of

dropping out in Mathematics subject.

MA NILA EDUCA TIO N CENTER, Arroceros Forest Park


G at Antonio J. Villegas St., Erm ita, Manila, 1000
☎ 8527-2315 • 8527-5184 • 8527 -5180
www.depedm anila.net
sdo.m anila@deped.gov.ph
R epublic of the P hilippines
Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of City Schools
MANILA

Table 4

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Students' Performance

in Science Subject

Before IA After IA
Range
F % F %
70-71 3 14% 0 0%
72-73 6 27% 0 0%
74-75 11 50% 16 73%
76-77 2 9% 5 23%
78-79 0 0% 1 4%
80 and above 0 0% 0 0%
TOTAL 22 100% 22 100%

Table 4 presents the frequency and percentage distribution of students' performance in

Science before and after the execution of integrative assessment intervention program (IAIP).

Table 4 showed that before the integrative assessment, majority or 50% of the 22 students

identified at risk of dropping out has an obtained average of between 74 -75 during the 1st and 2nd

grading period. Three representing 14% of the students falling in the lowest average range between

70-71. After the conduct of the integrative assessment, 16 representing 73% of the students

obtained an average range between 74 -75. None of the students obtained average range between

70-71 and 72-73, respectively. These figures implied that the application of integrative assessment

has improved the academic performance of students identified at risk of dropping out in Science

subject evident with the huge increase on the number of students who ob tained average range

between 74-75.

MA NILA EDUCA TIO N CENTER, Arroceros Forest Park


G at Antonio J. Villegas St., Erm ita, Manila, 1000
☎ 8527-2315 • 8527-5184 • 8527 -5180
www.depedm anila.net
sdo.m anila@deped.gov.ph
R epublic of the P hilippines
Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of City Schools
MANILA

Table 5

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Students' Performance in

Araling Panlipunan Subject

Before IA After IA
Range
F % F %
70-71 2 6% 0 0%
72-73 9 28% 0 0%
74-75 14 44% 16 50%
76-77 5 16% 10 31%
78-79 2 6% 5 16%
80 and above 0 0% 1 3%
TOTAL 32 100% 32 100%

Table 5 presents the frequency and percentage distribution of students' performance in

Araling Panlipunan before and after the facilitation of integrative assessment intervention program

(IAIP).

As shown in Table 5, before the integrative assessment, majority or 44% of the 32 students

identified at risk of dropping out has an obtained average of between 74 -75 during the 1st and 2nd

grading period. Two or 6% of the students fa lling in the lowest average range between 70 -71. After

the conduct of the integrative assessment, majority or 50% of the students obtained an average

range between 74 -75. None of the students obtained average range between 70 -71 and 72-73,

respectively. It can be inferred from these figures that the application of integrative assessment has

enhanced the academic performance of students identified at risk of dropping out in Araling

Panlipunan subject.

MA NILA EDUCA TIO N CENTER, Arroceros Forest Park


G at Antonio J. Villegas St., Erm ita, Manila, 1000
☎ 8527-2315 • 8527-5184 • 8527 -5180
www.depedm anila.net
sdo.m anila@deped.gov.ph
R epublic of the P hilippines
Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of City Schools
MANILA

Table 6

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Studen ts' Performance in

ESP Subject

Before IA After IA
Range
F % F %
70-71 0 0% 0 0%
72-73 7 28% 0 0%
74-75 15 60% 13 52%
76-77 2 8% 10 40%
78-79 1 4% 2 8%
80 and above 0 0% 0 0%
TOTAL 25 100% 25 100%

Table 6 presents the frequency and percentage distribution of students' performance in

Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao (ESP) before and after the administration of integrative assessment

intervention program (IAIP).

It can de deduced from Table 6 that before the integrative assessment, 15 representing 60%

of the 25 students identified at risk of dropping out has an obtained average of between 74 -75

during the 1st and 2nd grading period. Seven or 28% of the students falling in the second lowest

average range of 72 -73. After the conduct of the integrative as sessment, majority or 52% of the

students obtained an average range of 74 -75. None of the students obtained average range

between 70-71 and 72-73, respectively. It can be inferred from these figures that the application of

integrative assessment has improved the academic performance of students identified at risk of

dropping out in Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao (ESP) subject.

MA NILA EDUCA TIO N CENTER, Arroceros Forest Park


G at Antonio J. Villegas St., Erm ita, Manila, 1000
☎ 8527-2315 • 8527-5184 • 8527 -5180
www.depedm anila.net
sdo.m anila@deped.gov.ph
R epublic of the P hilippines
Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of City Schools
MANILA

Table 7

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Students' Performance

in TLE Subject

Before IA After IA
Range
F % F %
70-71 0 0% 0 0%
72-73 7 50% 0 0%
74-75 4 29% 6 43%
76-77 2 14% 5 36%
78-79 0 0% 1 7%
80 and above 1 7% 2 14%
TOTAL 14 100% 14 100%

Table 7 presents the frequency and percentage distribution of students' performance in

Technology & Livelihoo d Economics (TLE) before and after the conduct of integrative assessment

intervention program (IAIP).

Table 7 revealed that before the integrative assessment, majority or 50% of the 14 students

identified at risk of dropping out has obtained the second lo west average range of 72 -73 during the

1st and 2nd grading period. After the conduct of the integrative assessment, 6 representing 43% of

the students obtained an average range between 74 -75. None of the students obtained average

range between 70 -71 and 72-73, respectively. These figures implied that the use of integrative

assessment has improved the academic performance of students identified at risk of dropping out in

Technology & Livelihood Economics (TLE).

MA NILA EDUCA TIO N CENTER, Arroceros Forest Park


G at Antonio J. Villegas St., Erm ita, Manila, 1000
☎ 8527-2315 • 8527-5184 • 8527 -5180
www.depedm anila.net
sdo.m anila@deped.gov.ph
R epublic of the P hilippines
Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of City Schools
MANILA

Table 8

Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Students' Performance

in MAPEH Subject

Before IA After IA
Range
F % F %
70-71 2 8% 0 0%
72-73 4 15% 0 0%
74-75 11 42 % 4 15 %
76-77 7 27% 9 35 %
78-79 1 4% 5 19%
80 and above 1 4% 8 31%
TOTAL 26 100% 26 100%

Table 8 presents the frequency and percentage distribution of students' performance in

Music, Arts, Physical Education, and Health (MAPEH) before and after the application of integrative

assessment intervention program (IAIP).

As shown in Table 8, before the integrative as sessment, 11 representing 42% of the 26

students identified at risk of dropping out has an obtained average of between 74 -75 during the 1st

and 2nd grading period. Two or 8% of the students falling in the lowest average range between 70 -

71. After the condu ct of the integrative assessment, majority or 35% of the students obtained an

average range between 76 -77. None of the students obtained average range between 70 -71 and

72-73, respectively. It can be inferred from these figures that the application of inte grative

assessment has enhanced the academic performance of students identified at risk of dropping out

in MAPEH subject.

MA NILA EDUCA TIO N CENTER, Arroceros Forest Park


G at Antonio J. Villegas St., Erm ita, Manila, 1000
☎ 8527-2315 • 8527-5184 • 8527 -5180
www.depedm anila.net
sdo.m anila@deped.gov.ph
R epublic of the P hilippines
Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of City Schools
MANILA

Conclusions and Recom m endations

Utmost importance in exploring ways and means to support learning and development of

students in a continuously evolving educational landscape has been intensifying in the current

sweeping of school curriculum. The process of assessing students academic performance,

particularly those at risk of dropping out, through integrating intervention programs with real-world

practice are central in ensuring that no learner will be left behind .

The findings of this study have had ascertained that the facilitation of 'Integrative

Assessment Intervention Program' among Students At Risk of Dropping Out (SARDO) has

significantly yielded positive results evident with the number of students obtaining a passing grade

and a significant reduction of students falling under the lowest average range. Ergo, the optimization

of 'Integrative Assessment Intervention Program' was believed to be a viable tool towards the

attainment of a desirable level of students' academic performance and is bound to have significant

impact in the overall teaching and learning process.

With the interviews conducted by the researcher, it was found out t hat the school teachers

were provided by the school with a laptop, complete with installed office tools and educational

software which are primarily utilized for instructional purposes and assessment of student learning.

It is desirable to note that virtual and onsite trainings with focus on recent trends in teaching style,

modality and digital literacy be continuously provided by the school to ensure that school teachers

learn first-hand the different innovations in today's educational landscape.

The researcher is certain that this study will encourage more school teach ers to explore the

viability of optimizing assessment programs as intervention in strengthening the process of

MA NILA EDUCA TIO N CENTER, Arroceros Forest Park


G at Antonio J. Villegas St., Erm ita, Manila, 1000
☎ 8527-2315 • 8527-5184 • 8527 -5180
www.depedm anila.net
sdo.m anila@deped.gov.ph
R epublic of the P hilippines
Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of City Schools
MANILA

assessment. This will allow school teachers meticulously monitor students particularly those who

are at risk of failing in academic subjects or dropping out of school. In another note, students will

also be provided with enriched teaching -learning environment with the use of alternative modes of

classroom instruction infused with relevant teaching pedagogies which can significantly impact their

learning experiences.

Recomm endations

Based from the findings and reflections of the study, the following are hereby recommended.

1. The researcher recommends the application of this study to other grade levels to further

validate the findings.

2. It is recommended to continuously provide trainings to schools teachers on breakthroughs

about teaching style, optimization of multimedia resources, and student assessment.

MA NILA EDUCA TIO N CENTER, Arroceros Forest Park


G at Antonio J. Villegas St., Erm ita, Manila, 1000
☎ 8527-2315 • 8527-5184 • 8527 -5180
www.depedm anila.net
sdo.m anila@deped.gov.ph
R epublic of the P hilippines
Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of City Schools
MANILA

REFERENCES

Handoyo, Eko. (2021). Performance of Educational Assessments: Integrated As sessment as an


Assessment Innovation during the Covid -19 Pandemic. Turkish Journal of Computer and
Mathematics Education. 12. 2708 -2718. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i6.5777

Lucero, Nelson, E. (2020). Alternative Delivery Mode (ADM) Program Delivery and Performance
of Students. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.46827/ejoe.v5i2.3388

Sharma, R. C., Kawachi, P., & Bozkurt, A. (2019). Exploring Changing Perspectives in Distance
Education. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 1 -6. Retrieved from
http://asianjde.org/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/285

MA NILA EDUCA TIO N CENTER, Arroceros Forest Park


G at Antonio J. Villegas St., Erm ita, Manila, 1000
☎ 8527-2315 • 8527-5184 • 8527 -5180
www.depedm anila.net
sdo.m anila@deped.gov.ph
R epublic of the P hilippines
Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of City Schools
MANILA

DECLARATIO N O F ANTI-PLAG IARISM AND ABSENCE O F CO NFLICT O F INTEREST

1. I, Divina Batin, understand that plagiarism is the act of taking and using another’s ideas and
works and passing them off as one’s own. This includes explicitly copying the whole work of
another person or that of the undersigned proponents and/or using some parts of their work
without proper acknowledgment and referencing.

2. I hereby attest to the originality of this research proposal and has cited properly all the
references used. I/W e further commit that all deliverables and the final research study
emanating from this proposal shall be of original content. I/W e shall use appropriate citations
in referencing oth er works from various sources. I/W e also hereby attest that this research
has not yet been finished and is not part of the proponent/s’ thesis/dissertation.

3. I understand that violation from this declaration and commitment shall be subject to
consequences and shall be dealt with accordingly by the Department of Education.

DIVINA BATIN
Name and Signature of Lead Proponent
May 2023
Date

Nam e and Signature of Proponent


Click or tap to enter a date.
Date

Nam e and Signature of Proponent


Click or tap to enter a date.
Date

MA NILA EDUCA TIO N CENTER, Arroceros Forest Park


G at Antonio J. Villegas St., Erm ita, Manila, 1000
☎ 8527-2315 • 8527-5184 • 8527 -5180
www.depedm anila.net
sdo.m anila@deped.gov.ph
R epublic of the P hilippines
Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of City Schools
MANILA

DECLARATIO N O F ABSENCE OF CO NFLICT O F INTEREST

1. I, Divina Batin, understand that conflict of interest refers to situations in which


financial or other personal considerations m ay com prom ise m y judgm ent in
evaluating, conducting, or reporting research.

2. I hereby declare that I do not have any personal conflict of interest that m ay arise
from m y application and subm ission of m y research proposal. I understand that m y
research proposal m ay be returned to m e if found ou t that there is conflict of interest
during the initial screening as per DO 16, s. 2017.

3. Further, in case of any form of conflict of intere st (possible or actual) which m ay


inadvertently em erge during the conduct of m y research, I will duly report it to the
research com m ittee for im m ediate action.

4. I understand that I m ay be held accountable by the Departm ent of Education for


any conflict of interest which I have intentionally concealed.

DIVINA BATIN

Nam e and Signature of Lead Proponent


03/01/2023

Date

Nam e and Signature of Proponent


Click or tap to enter a date.

Date

Nam e and Signature of Proponent


Click or tap to enter a date.

Date

MA NILA EDUCA TIO N CENTER, Arroceros Forest Park


G at Antonio J. Villegas St., Erm ita, Manila, 1000
☎ 8527-2315 • 8527-5184 • 8527 -5180
www.depedm anila.net
sdo.m anila@deped.gov.ph
R epublic of the P hilippines
Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of City Schools
MANILA

APPENDICES

a. Application Form

b. Declaration of Anti-Plagiarism

c. Declaration of Absence of Conflict of I nterest

d. Research Instrum ent, if any

e. Curriculum Vitae of Proponent/s

MA NILA EDUCA TIO N CENTER, Arroceros Forest Park


G at Antonio J. Villegas St., Erm ita, Manila, 1000
☎ 8527-2315 • 8527-5184 • 8527 -5180
www.depedm anila.net
sdo.m anila@deped.gov.ph
R epublic of the P hilippines
Department of Education
National Capital Region
Division of City Schools
MANILA

APPENDIX A

1 February 2023

Subject: Letter to the Respondents

Dear Respondent,

A pleasant day to you.

The undersigned is currently workin g on a action research entitled “ PERFO RMANCE


IMPRO VEMENT O F STUDENTS AT RISK O F DRO PPING O UT (SARDO ) THRO UG H INTERG RATIVE
ASSESSMENT INTERVENTIO N PROG RAM ”.

In this connection, I am requesting your participation in this s tudy. Rest assu red that all data
and inform ation will be kept confidential and will be used for the sole purpose of the action
research only.

Thank you.

Respectfully yours,

Divina Batin

School Teacher

MA NILA EDUCA TIO N CENTER, Arroceros Forest Park


G at Antonio J. Villegas St., Erm ita, Manila, 1000
☎ 8527-2315 • 8527-5184 • 8527 -5180
www.depedm anila.net
sdo.m anila@deped.gov.ph

You might also like