IET Power Electronics

Research Article

Receiving-coil structure reducing stray AC ISSN 1755-4535

Received on 9th May 2018
Revised 10th May 2019
resistance for resonant coupling wireless Accepted on 17th May 2019
E-First on 11th July 2019
power transfer doi: 10.1049/iet-pel.2018.5358
www.ietdl.org

Kazuhiro Umetani1 , Toru Honjo1, Takahiro Koyama1, Masataka Ishihara1, Eiji Hiraki1
1Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, 3-1-1 Tsushima-naka, Kita-ku, Okayama, Japan
E-mail: umetani@okayama-u.ac.jp

Abstract: Resonant inductive coupling wireless power transfer is widely known to be a possible convenient power supply
method for the small mobile apparatus. However, the limited receiving-coil size tends to lower the efficiency and limit the output
power owing to the small mutual inductance and comparatively large stray alternating current (AC) resistance of the receiving-
coil. This study mitigates this issue by proposing a novel receiving-coil structure. This proposed structure comprises a coil and a
drum core with a thin axis. The coil is wound on the axis to form a single winding layer. The proposed structure can reduce stray
AC resistance by suppressing the proximity effect and reducing the wire length without deteriorating the mutual inductance
significantly. Therefore, better efficiency and larger output power can be achieved. Simulations and experiments were performed
to verify the proposed structure. Consequently, both simulations and experiments supported the reduction in AC resistance
compared to the conventional structure. Furthermore, the experiment revealed improvements by the proposed structure in both
efficiency and output power. These results support the effectiveness of the proposed structure for wireless power transfer to
small mobile apparatus.

1 Introduction
The recent progress in consumer electronics has resulted in small
mobile electric apparatus such as mobile phones [1, 2] and capsule
endoscopy [3–7]. On account of the limited size of these apparatus,
their internal battery tends to exhibit insufficient electric capacity,
thus resulting in the need for frequent power charging from outside
the apparatus. However, the cable connection for the power supply
to these apparatus may deteriorate mobility.
Resonant inductive coupling–wireless coupling transfer (RIC–
WPT) [1–16] is a promising method to overcome this issue. The
RIC–WPT technique can supply electric power without a cable
connection to the external power source.
Fig. 1 illustrates a typical RIC–WPT system. The system
comprises a transmitting resonator and a receiving resonator, each
comprising a coil and a resonating capacitor. The transmitting and
receiving coils are coupled magnetically through a vacant space.
These resonators are designed to exhibit the same resonant
frequency such that the resonance in the transmitting resonator can
trigger the resonance in the receiving resonator.
However, the RIC–WPT to a small mobile apparatus tends to
demonstrate low efficiency and small output power owing to the
limited size of the receiving-coil [3–7]. Consequently, a large
alternating current (AC) current is required in the transmitting coil
to generate sufficient magnetic flux linkage with the receiving-coil,
thus causing a significant heat generation in the transmitting coil.
Fig. 1  Resonant inductive coupling wireless power transfer system
IET Power Electron., 2019, Vol. 12 Iss. 9, pp. 2338-2344
© The Institution of Engineering and Technology 2019
Hence, the practical RIC–WPT system for small mobile apparatus
must be improved for better efficiency and output power.
As reported in the literature [7–9], the maximum efficiency of
the RIC–WPT system is determined by the figure-of-merit F,
which is defined as
F = k2QTQR, (1)
where k is the magnetic coupling coefficient, QT and QR are the
quality factor of the transmitting and receiving resonators,
respectively, defined as follows:
1 LT 1 LR
QT = , QR = , (2)
rT CT rR CR
r is the stray AC resistance of the coil, L is the self-inductance of
the coil, and C is the resonating capacitance. Subscripts T and R
correspond to the transmitting and receiving resonators,
respectively (the power load is not included in rR).
Substituting (2) into (1) yields
k2 LT LR 1 M2
F= = , (3)
rTrR CT CR rT LTCT LRCR rR
where M is the mutual inductance between the transmitting and
receiving coils.
The figure-of-merit F contains parameters relevant to both the
transmitting and receiving resonators. However, focusing on the
receiving-coil, we can extract a factor of the receiving-coil to
achieve a larger F. Since LRCR is typically determined by the
specification provided for the resonance frequency, the receiving-
coil with a larger M2/rR achieves a larger F, i.e. better efficiency.
Similarly, M2/rR determines the maximum output power of the
RIC–WPT system, as discussed in [16]. Therefore, increasing
M2/rR is essential for improving both the efficiency and output
power.
To increase this factor, a number of designs have been
developed to increase M [4, 5, 10–12]. Two approaches are
typically utilised in the receiving-coil design: one is to wind the
2338
Fig. 2  Conventional and proposed receiving coil structures
(a) Conventional structure,
(b) Proposed structure
Fig. 3  Schematic illustration of flux lines in conventional and proposed receiving coil structures
(a) Conventional structure,
(b) Proposed structure
receiving coils to encompass a large area, and the other is to wind
the receiving-coil on a magnetic core. Particularly, the magnetic
core for the receiving-coil can offer a low reluctance flux path to
collect the magnetic flux from the transmitting coil. Consequently,
M can be increased effectively, as is confirmed in this study;
therefore, it is utilised in a number of preceding studies [4, 5, 13].
However, these two approaches generally increase rR. The
former tends to involve a long wire length, thus increasing rR. The
latter may increase the eddy current [14, 16–18] in the winding in
many cases because many magnetic structures with the magnetic
core can cause an intense local magnetic field near the winding, as
discussed in Section 2. Therefore, further improving M2/rR may
involve reducing rR.
Reducing rR has been performed by using special wires such as
the Litz wire and magnetoplated wire [18, 19]. However, this
approach may be inconvenient for applications produced in a small
scale because they are typically custom made. An alternative
approach may be improving the magnetic structure because the
ferrite core is supplied commercially in various shapes, although
this approach is rarely investigated for RIC–WPT systems.
A magnetic structure that can reduce rR using a solid copper
wire without deteriorating M is proposed herein. First, the
conventional receiving-coil structure reported in [5, 13] is
presented; it employed the aforementioned two approaches to
improve M. Then, this paper sought for a magnetic structure that
could further reduce rR while maintaining an M as high as that of
the conventional structure. The basic principle of this structure was
originally proposed in a conference paper [16]. However, this
paper includes additional simulation and experimental evidences to
elucidate the validity of each feature of the proposed structure for
improving the efficiency and output power.
2 Proposed receiving-coil structure
Fig. 2 illustrates the proposed and conventional receiving-coil
structures. The conventional structure contains a cylindrical core.
The top and bottom surfaces are designed to encompass the largest
IET Power Electron., 2019, Vol. 12 Iss. 9, pp. 2338-2344
© The Institution of Engineering and Technology 2019
possible area such that the core can collect a large flux from the
transmitting coil.
Meanwhile, the proposed structure is composed of a drum core
with a thin axis and a receiving-coil wound on the axis. The
receiving-coil is wound to form a single winding layer. The top and
bottom surfaces of the core are designed to encompass the largest
possible area, similarly as in the conventional structure, although
the axis has a significantly smaller sectional area than the top and
bottom surfaces. Hence, the proposed structure can occupy the
same volumetric area as the conventional structure. The drum core
is a typical shape of the ferrite core. Therefore, the proposed
structure can be constructed of commercially available ferrite core.
The magnetic core is assumed to exhibit a significantly larger
permeability than air. Hence, the magnetic cores of the proposed
and conventional structures offer a low reluctance flux path for the
flux from the transmitting coil. Since the top and bottom surface
areas of the cores of both the structures are the same, these
structures can collect a similar amount of flux from the
transmitting coil. Furthermore, almost all of the flux passing
through the top and bottom surfaces of the core interlinks with the
receiving-coil. Consequently, these structures can exhibit a similar
mutual inductance M.
However, the AC resistance rR of the receiving-coil can be
small in the proposed structure because
i. The thin axis can reduce the wire length of the receiving-coil;
ii. The winding edges are covered by the top and bottom brims of
the core, thus suppressing the eddy current inside the winding;
iii. The single winding layer can avoid the proximity effect caused
by multiple winding layers, thus further suppressing the eddy
current.
The first reason is apparent. Hence, the second and third reasons
are discussed below.
The second reason is discussed first. In addition to the small
amount of flux interlinking both the transmitting and receiving
coils, a comparatively large flux is generated by the leakage
inductance of the receiving-coil. Particularly, the core increases
2339
this flux owing to its low reluctance. Therefore, this flux primarily
causes a magnetic field near the winding, which generates the eddy
current.
The flux lines of this flux form a closed path interlinking only
with the receiving-coil, as illustrated in Fig. 3. According to the
electromagnetism of the linear media, the curving flux lines
indicate the concentrated magnetic flux density distribution: The
flux density becomes large toward the inner side of the curve [20].
(The flux lines reflecting at the boundary of the materials of
different permeabilities [21] are excluded from the curving flux
lines.) Since the flux lines turn sharply near the winding edge, the
flux density tends to be larger near the edge.
In the conventional structure, the winding edge is primarily
exposed in the air; therefore, the flux lines turn sharply in the air.
Hence, the intense magnetic field occurs near the winding edge
owing to the large flux density and low permeability. As is widely
known, the eddy current is caused by the intense magnetic field at
the winding surface [14, 17–18]. Consequently, the conventional
structure tends to suffer from a large rR caused by the large eddy
current.
Meanwhile, the winding edge is covered more with the
magnetic core in the proposed structure; further, the flux lines turn
primarily inside the core. Therefore, a large flux density was
resulted in a weak magnetic field because of the large permeability,
thus suppressing the eddy current. Consequently, the proposed
structure can improve M2/rR by reducing rR, thus increasing both
efficiency and output power.
The third reason is discussed next. Although the drum core can
suppress the eddy current near the winding edge, the multiple
winding layers are another cause of the eddy current, as reported in
the literature [14, 17–18]. Hence, multiple winding layers increase
the AC resistance. Particularly, if the wire cross-section exhibits
larger dimensions than the skin depth, the single winding layer will
have less AC resistance than the multiple winding layers [22].
Therefore, the proposed structure has a single winding layer to
reduce rR.
Fig. 4  Geometry and dimensions of simulation models of receiving coil
(a) Coreless structure (M1),
(b) Conventional structure (M2),
(c) Proposed structure (M3),
(d) Drum core with two winding layers (M4)
2340
3 Simulation
A finite-element-method-based magnetic field simulation was
performed to evaluate the basic principles of the proposed
structure. Fig. 4 illustrates the geometry and dimensions of the
simulation models.
In this simulation, the proposed structure (M3) was compared
with three structures: the coreless receiving-coil structure (M1), the
conventional structure with the magnetic core (M2), and the
receiving-coil wound on the drum core that formed two winding
layers of a thick wire (M4). Models M1–M3 have the same wire
thickness, whereas M4 has approximately twice as large wire
thickness to form two winding layers. The wire thickness of all the
models is larger than the skin depth, which was estimated as 0.073 
mm at 800 kHz. All the models have the same top and bottom
surface dimensions and height. Consequently, M3 and M4 have a
slightly smaller number of turns of the receiving-coil than M1 and
M2, because the height of the axis is 20% smaller than the height
of the winding area for M1 and M2.
Hence, this difference in the number of turns may result in a
significant difference in the self-inductance. However, the resonant
capacitor connected in series with the receiving-coil is assumed to
be adjusted such that the inductance–capacitance product of the
receiving resonator, i.e. LRCR of M1–M4 is the same as that of the
transmitting resonator, i.e. LTCT. Under this assumption, the
difference in LR among M1–M4 does not affect the maximum
efficiency and the maximum output power, according to (3) and
[16] (equation (10) in the Appendix).
The magnetic core for M2–M4 was a lossless ferrite core,
whose magnetic flux-field curve (B-H curve) is the same as that of
Hitachi Metals’ ML12D. Hence, the copper loss is the only
contributor to rR.
The magnetic field and flux lines were simulated under an AC
current of 1.0 A peak, 800 kHz in the receiving-coil. A high
operating frequency is preferable in the RIC–WPT system because
this would result in large voltage induction in the receiving-coil.
However, an excessively high frequency deteriorates the magnetic
characteristics of the magnetic core material. The operating
frequency of 800 kHz was determined to be slightly lower in the
logarithmic scale than the upper limit of the frequency that
deteriorated the magnetic characteristics of the magnetic core,
which was ∼2 MHz according to the datasheet [23].
The simulator was JMAG 14.0 (JSOL Corp.) We constructed
the axial symmetric model of the receiving coils M1–M4 at the
centre of the cylindrical simulation model space with the diameter
of 26 mm and the height of 26 mm. Owing to the axial symmetry
of the receiving-coil models and the model space, the 2-
dimensional axial symmetric electromagnetic field analysis was
performed using the magnetic vector potential method. The
boundary of the model space was set at the symmetry boundary
condition, which prohibits the penetration of the magnetic flux.
Fig. 5 shows the simulation results. An intense magnetic field
appeared near the winding edges in M1 and M2. Meanwhile, the
magnetic field was suppressed near the winding edges in M3 and
M4, although the flux lines were found to concentrate inside the
core. These features are consistent with the discussions of the
previous section.
Fig. 6 shows the current density in the wire cross-section of
winding turns at P1–P3 defined in Fig. 5. Regarding M2, a large
current appeared particularly in P1. The current flowed oppositely
between the upper and lower sides of P1, indicating the occurrence
of an eddy current. Therefore, a large eddy current occurred
particularly in the wire near the winding edge. Meanwhile, the
current distributed more homogeneously in M3 and M4 even near
the winding edge. However, compared with M3, the opposite
current flowed in the outer winding layer of M4. This current
distribution is consistently interpreted as the result of the eddy
current caused by the multiple winding layers.
Fig. 7 shows the copper loss per unit length of the winding turns
at P1–P6. The winding turn at P1 was found to generate the largest
copper loss in M2. Therefore, the eddy current at the winding edge
is the primary cause of the AC resistance rR. Meanwhile, the
copper loss was almost equal among P1–P3 in M1, M3, and M4.
IET Power Electron., 2019, Vol. 12 Iss. 9, pp. 2338-2344
© The Institution of Engineering and Technology 2019
Fig. 5  Simulation results of magnetic field and flux lines
(a) M1,
(b) M2,
(c) M3,
(d) M4

Compared to M1 and M3, M4 demonstrated a slightly larger 4 Experiment

copper loss in the outer winding layer.
Finally, the mutual inductance M and AC resistance rR at 800  An experiment was performed to verify the effectiveness of the
kHz were simulated. For evaluating the mutual inductance, the
transmitting coil was modelled as shown in Fig. 8, based on the
experimental wireless power transfer system that will be shown in
the next section.
Table 1 shows the simulation result. The models with the
magnetic core, i.e. M2–M4, indicated significantly greater mutual
inductances M than that of M1, although M3 and M4 indicated
slightly smaller M than M2 by 22%. This reduction was primarily
caused by the reduced winding turns in M3 and M4.
Regarding the AC resistance, the proposed structure, i.e. M3,
indicated the least rR. The proposed structure reduced rR into 7% of
the conventional structure, i.e. M2. It is noteworthy that the total
wire length of the proposed structure is ∼24% that of the
conventional structure. Therefore, this significant reduction in rR is
not only contributed by the reduction in the wire length but also by
the suppression of the eddy current. Consequently, the proposed
structure increased the factor M2/rR by ∼8.2 times, thus suggesting
the effectiveness of the proposed structure in terms of better
efficiency and larger output power.
IET Power Electron., 2019, Vol. 12 Iss. 9, pp. 2338-2344
© The Institution of Engineering and Technology 2019
proposed structure in terms of efficiency and output power. Fig. 9
shows the photographs of the experimental prototypes of the
receiving-coil structures M1–M4. The geometry and dimensions of
the prototypes are the same as those in Fig. 4. In the experiment, a
resistor was connected in series to the receiving resonator as the
load of the system, similarly as Fig. 1.
The specifications of the experimental receiving resonators are
presented in Table 2. The resonating capacitors were designed to
exhibit the same resonant frequency of 800 kHz. The number of
turns and the wire diameter were set as the same number as that of
the simulation models in the previous section.
The core material employed for the receiving-coil structures
was 7H20 (FDK Corp.) [24]. According to the datasheet, the
operating frequency, i.e. 800 kHz, does not result in a decrease in
the permeability of this material.
In this experiment, a wireless power transfer system, as shown
in Fig. 10, was employed. The transmitting resonator was designed
to exhibit far larger dimensions than the receiving-coil, as shown in
Fig. 10a, for evaluating the wireless power transfer to a small
receiving-coil in a small apparatus. The receiving-coil is placed on
the top of a wooden table. Thereby, the whole system is separated
2341
Fig. 6  Current density in the wire cross-section
(a) M1,
(b) M2,
(c) M3,
(d) M4

Fig. 8  Disposition of transmitting and receiving coils for simulation of

mutual inductance

Table 1 Simulation results of factor M2/rR

M1 M2 M3 M4
LR, μH 20 80 73 74
rR, Ω 1.9 7.5 0.56 1.4
M, nH 13 50 39 39
M2/rR, (nH)2/Ω 88 3.4 × 102 2.8 × 103 1.1 × 103

4.1 AC resistance and mutual inductance

Fig. 7  Copper loss per unit length of winding turn
(a) M1,
(b) M2,
(c) M3,
(d) M4
sufficiently from the ground. For simplifying the construction of
the experimental wireless power transfer system, the transmitting
coil is placed 300 mm above the tabletop, thus resulting in the
distance of 295 mm between the centres of the transmitting and
receiving resonators.
The specifications of the transmitting resonator are presented in
Table 2. The resonating frequency of the transmitting resonator
was also designed at 800 kHz, which is identical to that of the
receiving resonators. Therefore, the difference in LR among the
prototypes barely affects the efficiency and maximum output
power.
First, the factor M2/rR was compared among the prototypes based
on the measurement results of the AC resistance rR and mutual
inductance M. The AC resistance rR was measured using an
impedance analyser (IM7581 manufactured by HIOKI Co., Ltd.).
The mutual inductance between the transmitting and receiving
coils was measured using the experimental wireless power transfer
system. The mutual inductance was determined based on the
measurement of the voltage induction in the receiving-coil when
the load resistor was disconnected from the receiving resonator and
the sinusoidal current of 1.0 Arms, 800 kHz was applied to the
transmitting coil.
Table 3 shows the result. The proposed structure, i.e. M3,
indicated the least rR among the prototypes. Particularly, rR was
reduced significantly compared to the conventional structure, i.e.
M2, indicating the effectiveness of the proposed structure in
suppressing the eddy current at the winding edge using the drum
core. Furthermore, the comparison between M3 and M4 revealed

2342 IET Power Electron., 2019, Vol. 12 Iss. 9, pp. 2338-2344

© The Institution of Engineering and Technology 2019
 Fig. 10  Photographs of experimental wireless power transfer system
(a) Geometry and dimensions of transmitting coil,
(b) Disposition of transmitting and receiving coils

Table 3 Results of factor M2/rR

Fig. 9  Photographs of experimental prototypes of receiving coil structures M1 M2 M3 M4
(a) M1, rR, Ω 2.0 7.6 1.1 2.2
(b) M2,
M, nH 14 54 47 43
(c) M3,
M2/rR, (nH)2/Ω 98 3.9 × 102 2.0 × 103 8.4 × 102
(d) M4

Table 2 Specifications of experimental wireless power

transfer system Table 4 AC resistance caused by iron loss
M1 M2 M3 M4 M1 M2 M3 M4
receiving resonator Ks — — 9.6 × 107 9.6 × 107
wire diameter, mm 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.30 riron, Ω — — 0.40 0.40
number of turns, turns 54 54 43 43
self-inductance, μH 20 82 74 74
capacitance, nF 2.0 0.48 0.53 0.54 Let B be the effective value of the AC flux density of the axis
transmitting resonator generated by the self-inductance LR. Subsequently, B can be
wire diameter, mm 3.0 formulated as
number of turns, turns 10
ϕ LRi
coil diameter, mm inner: 115, outer: 145 B= = , (4)
S SNR
self-inductance, μH 51
capacitance, nF 0.78
where ϕ is the AC flux, S is the cross-sectional area of the axis, i is
the effective value of the AC current, and NR is the number of turns
of the receiving-coil.
that rR was reduced effectively in the proposed structure by
The iron loss per unit volume of the ferrite can be formulated as
avoiding multiple winding layers.
kSB2 according to the Steinmetz equation [25, 26], where kS is the
The mutual inductance of M2–M4 were significantly larger than
that of M1 owing to the magnetic core. Certainly, the proposed coefficient. Hence, if the AC resistance caused by the iron loss is
structure, i.e. M3, reduced the mutual inductance slightly by 13% denoted as riron, riron can be obtained as follows:
compared with the conventional structure, i.e. M2. However, the
proposed structure indicated the largest value of M2/rR among the kSLR2 ℓ 2 kSLR2 ℓ
Piron = kSB2Sℓ = i, ∴ riron = . (5)
prototypes. The proposed structure exhibited an M2/rR that was 4.3 SNR2 SNR2
times as large as the conventional structure.
The experimental result of rR of the proposed structure was where Piron is the iron loss of the axis; ℓ is the height of the core.
twice as large as the simulation result, whereas that of the By determining the coefficient kS from the datasheet [24], riron
conventional structure agreed well with the simulation. This is is estimated, as shown in Table 4. Consequently, riron can explain
attributable to iron loss, which was neglected in the simulation. the difference between the simulation and the experimental results.
The magnetic core of the proposed structure has a thin axis. As shown above, the proposed structure can reduce copper loss.
Therefore, a significantly larger magnetic flux density appears in However, the excessively thin axis generates a significant iron loss.
the axis rather than in the conventional structure, and may cause a Hence, optimising the diameter of the axis may be important to
significant iron loss to increase rR. It is noteworthy that the top and minimise the parasitic AC resistance rR, which is effective for
bottom brims of the drum core have significantly larger cross- maximising M2/rR.
sectional areas for the magnetic flux generated by the self-
inductance than the thin axis. Therefore, the iron loss at the brims 4.2 Efficiency and output power
can be neglected, because the brims have a significantly lower flux
density than the axis. Consequently, the AC resistance caused by Next, the efficiency and output power are compared among the
the iron loss (riron) can be estimated based on the iron loss prototypes. In this experiment, the AC current of the transmitting
estimation of the axis. coil was set at 1.0 Arms. The load resistance was set such that the
system can maximise the efficiency in the evaluations of the

IET Power Electron., 2019, Vol. 12 Iss. 9, pp. 2338-2344 2343

© The Institution of Engineering and Technology 2019
Table 5 Optimum load resistance employed for experiment
output power evaluation, Ω
efficiency evaluation, Ω
Fig. 11  Evaluation results of output power and efficiency
efficiency and the output power in the evaluation of the output
power. The optimum load resistance was calculated according to
[15] for the efficiency and to [16] for the output power.
Consequently, the load resistance was set as the value shown in
Table 5.
Fig. 11 shows the evaluation results of the frequency
dependencies of the efficiency and output power. The proposed
structure demonstrated both the highest peak efficiency and peak
output power. Hence, the experiment supported the effectiveness of
the proposed structure for better efficiency and larger output power.
5 Conclusions
The RIC–WPT system for a small mobile apparatus suffers from
limited efficiency and output power owing to the size restrictions
of the receiving-coil. For improving the efficiency and output
power, a receiving-coil structure was proposed herein. The
proposed structure could reduce the AC resistance using a solid
copper wire without deteriorating the mutual inductance
significantly. The simulations supported the basic principles of the
proposed structure. In addition, the experiment verified the
improvement in the efficiency and output power, thereby
supporting the effectiveness of the proposed structure for RIC–
WPT to small mobile apparatus.
6 References
[1] Li, Q., Liang, C.Y.: ‘An inductive power transfer system with a high-Q
resonant tank for mobile device charging’, IEEE Trans. Power Electron.,
2015, 30, (11), pp. 6203–6212
[2] Riehl, S.P., Satyamoorthy, A., Akram, H., et al.: ‘Wireless power systems for
mobile devices supporting inductive and resonant operating modes’, IEEE
Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 2015, 63, (3), pp. 780–790
[3] Na, K., Jang, H., Ma, H., et al.: ‘Tracking optimal efficiency of magnetic
resonance wireless power transfer system for biomedical capsule endoscopy’,
IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 2015, 63, (1), pp. 295–304
[4] Badr, M.B., Somogyi-Gsizmazia, R., Delaney, R.K., et al.: ‘Wireless power
transfer for telemetric devices with variable orientation, for small rodent
behavior monitoring’, IEEE Sens. J., 2015, 15, (4), pp. 2144–2156
[5] Theilmann, T.P., Asbeck, M.P.: ‘An analytical model for inductively coupled
implantable biomedical devices with ferrite rods’, IEEE Trans. Biomed.
Circuits Syst., 2009, 3, (1), pp. 43–52
[6] Mao, S., Zhang, J., Song, K., et al.: ‘Wireless power transfer using a field-
enhancing coil and a small-sized receiver with low coupling coefficient’, IET
Power Electron., 2016, 9, (7), pp. 1546–1552
[7] RamRakhyani, K.A., Lazzi, G.: ‘On the design of efficient multi-coil
telemetry system for biomedical implants’, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits
Syst., 2013, 7, (1), pp. 11–23
2344
M1 M2 M3 M4
2.0 7.8 1.3 2.3
2.0 7.7 1.2 2.2
[8] Pinuela, M., Yates, C.D., Lucyszyn, S., et al.: ‘Maximizing DC-to-load
efficiency for inductive power transfer’, IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 2013,
28, (5), pp. 2437–2447
[9] Baker, W.M., Sarpeshkar, R.: ‘Feedback analysis and design of RF power
links for low-power bionic systems’, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst.,
2007, 1, pp. 28–38
[10] Haldi, R., Schenk, K., Nam, I., et al.: ‘Finite-element-simulation assisted
optimized design of an asymmetrical high-power inductive coupler with a
large air gap for EV charging’. Proc. IEEE Energy Conversion Congress
Exposition (ECCE2013), Denver, USA, September 2013, pp. 3635–3642
[11] Li, S., Mi, C.C.: ‘Wireless power transfer for electric vehicle applications’,
IEEE J. Emerging Sel. Top. Power Electron., 2015, 3, (1), pp. 4–17
[12] Mohammad, M., Kwak, S., Choi, S.: ‘Core design for better misalignment
tolerance and high range of wireless power charging for HEV’. Proc. IEEE
Applied Power Electronics Conf. (APEC2016), Long Beach, USA, March
2016, pp. 1748–1755
[13] Itoh, R., Sawahara, Y., Ishizaki, T., et al.: ‘Construction of a secure wireless
power transfer system for robot fish’. Proc. IEEE Wireless Power Transfer
Conf., Boulder, USA, May 2015, pp. 1–4
[14] Cove, R.S., Ordonez, M., Shafiei, N., et al.: ‘Improving wireless power
transfer efficiency using hollow windings with track-width-ratio’, IEEE
Trans. Power Electron., 2016, 31, (9), pp. 6524–6533
[15] Awai, I.: ‘Basic characteristics of ‘magnetic resonance’ wireless power
transfer system excited by a 0 Ohm power source’, IEICE Electron. Express,
2013, 10, (21), p. 20132008
[16] Honjo, T., Koyama, T., Umetani, K., et al.: ‘Novel receiving coil structure for
improving efficiency and power transfer capability of resonant inductive
coupling wireless power transfer’. Proc. Int. Conf. on Electrical Machines and
Systems (ICEMS), Chiba, Japan, November 2016, pp. 1–6
[17] Perry, P.M.: ‘Multiple layer series connected winding design for minimum
losses’, IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst., 1979, PAS-98, (1), pp. 116–123
[18] Shinagawa, H., Suzuki, T., Noda, M., et al.: ‘Theoretical analysis of AC
resistance in coil using magnetoplated wire’, IEEE Trans. Magn., 2009, 45,
(9), pp. 3251–3259
[19] Mizuno, T., Yachi, S., Kamiya, A., et al.: ‘Improvement in efficiency of
wireless power transfer of magnetic resonant coupling using magnetoplated
wire’, IEEE Trans. Magn., 2011, 47, (10), pp. 4445–4448
[20] Umetani, K., Itoh, Y., Yamamoto, M.: ‘A detection method of DC
magnetization utilizing local inhomogeneity of flux distribution in power
transformer core’. Proc. IEEE Energy Conversion Congress Exposition
(ECCE2014), Pittsburgh, USA, September 2014, pp. 3739–3746
[21] Umetani, K.: ‘Improvement of saturation property of iron powder core by flux
homogenizing structure’, IEEJ Trans. Electr. Electron. Eng., 2013, 8, (6), pp.
640–648
[22] Dale, E.M., Sulivan, R.C.: ‘General comparison of power loss in single-layer
and multi-layer windings’. Proc. IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conf.,
Recife, Brazil, June 2005, pp. 582–589
[23] ‘Hitachi Metals Corp., Product guide, Soft ferrites, p.16’. Available at http://
www.hitachi-metals.co.jp/e/products/elec/tel/pdf/hj-b3-d_c.pdf, accessed 16
February 2018
[24] ‘FDK Corp., Material characteristics 7H series’. Available at http://
www.fdk.co.jp/cyber-e/pdf/fe_7h.pdf, accessed 16 February 2018
[25] Ayachit, A., Kazimierczuk, K.M.: ‘Steinmetz equation for gapped magnetic
cores’, IEEE Magn. Lett., 2016, 7, Article ID: 1302704
[26] Van den Bosshe, A., Valchev, C.V.: ‘Inductors and transformers for power
electronics’ (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005, 1st edn.), pp. 118–122
IET Power Electron., 2019, Vol. 12 Iss. 9, pp. 2338-2344
© The Institution of Engineering and Technology 2019