Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sailboat Reflection
Sailboat Reflection
Sailboat Reflection:
similarities and differences. In groups of four, we were tasked with making seven
leading, and controlling - that we learned to use. My group was comprised of Aurora,
Gabriel, Matthew, and myself. We assigned Gabriel as our manager; his role consisted
of assigning tasks and providing knowledge on the steps needed to complete the task.
In the planning stage, my group took a unique approach. Instead of Googling the
steps of making a paper sailboat, we brainstormed ideas. We decided that all our
sailboats should look the same in order to maintain the same level of quality between
every sailboat. Gabriel came up with the time-efficient and simple idea of making a
keep the flagpole in place, and a paper sail. This idea then came to life, as Gabriel gave
us a little tutorial on how it was going to look, and this first boat became our group’s
our manager. One flaw in our planning stage was that we did not design our sailboat
with a hypothetical buyer or market in mind, and therefore did not know how to market
it. Rather, we focused on remaking the exact same sailboat with the same colour,
shape, and materials seven times. Overall, while our planning stage did have a flaw, I
think it was successful because we achieved everything we had aimed for when
The organising stage was crucial in our group’s success. Gabriel made a
prototype of sorts -a first draft- for us to use as a guide. This gave the group a sense of
direction, saved time, and provided us with clear instructions. Gabriel did not assign
roles, we decided as a collective to individually make our own boats. As I stated earlier,
the materials we used were straws, tape, play dough, and paper, as well as scissors.
Once we began making boats, Gabriel saw us struggling to attach the sails, and made
himself in charge of making the sails, leaving the rest of us to continue making the
boats. I believe this decision was key to our success in making seven boats in time.
presence. A good leader encourages their team with words of affirmation, shares a
long-term vision/goal, and defines aims and objectives. Gabriel’s approach to not be
overbearing and provide a silent but watchful presence, available to us if we had any
questions, was helpful but did not demonstrate many of the key aspects of being a
vocal, and provide positive commentary for the group. He was slightly reserved and did
not provide enthusiasm. Gabriel was a helpful manager, but he was not a leader as we
learned it in class. Regardless, I enjoyed collaborating with him and found his presence
helpful.
During the controlling stage, our team measured performance by ensuring the
production of 7 functional sailboats that were able to stand upright within the 15 minutes
given. Although we did finish our sailboats in time, we did not have time to consolidate
or discuss the necessary improvements for our group’s future success. Corrective
Sara Ibrahim
action was taken one time, when Gabriel instructed me that in order to make a better
base, I needed to lay the straws flat on the table and then tape them..Corrective action
was not taken in any other regard, but with more time our boats could have been
improved in a few ways. For example, we would be able to test if the boats could float
and/or remain standing in the face of wind. We also would have been able to compare
our individual boats to the prototype in more detail, rather than just a quick glance. I
Working with Gabriel, Aurora, and Matthew to construct seven sailboats was a
positive experience; I learned how the functions of management are connected. In order
for a quality product to be produced, every function must be completed properly. For
example, without our planning stage, we would have spent much too long gathering
which materials to use and organising tasks among one another in the organising stage,
which would have eventually led to our group not finishing in time. Every function is a
My group’s main weakness was our inability to complete the final stage of management
- the controlling stage. This negatively affected the quality of our boats because we
were not able to test them, which would have been very troublesome if the boats were
expected to float. That said, my group had a key strength all teams need, a positive and
while it lacked in certain areas, was enjoyable to be a part of and given the opportunity, I