Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Cancer Poster Rubric22

    Uploaded by

    spare
    4 views2 pages
    The document outlines criteria for evaluating a cancer group poster on presentation, 3D elements, diagrams, organization of information, research details, information quality, terminology, and submitted questions. A poster would receive a high rating if it was well laid out with clear headings and subheadings visible from 1 meter, included an eye-catching 3D element, had relevant diagrams clearly linked to text, logically organized information in a clear sequence, addressed all subtopics with adequate details, demonstrated accurate understanding of the cancer type, incorporated relevant terminology, and submitted 5 interesting questions that could be answered from the poster.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    2. Cancer Poster Rubric22

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document outlines criteria for evaluating a cancer group poster on presentation, 3D elements, diagrams, organization of information, research details, information quality, terminology, and submitted questions. A poster would receive a high rating if it was well laid out with clear headings and subheadings visible from 1 meter, included an eye-catching 3D element, had relevant diagrams clearly linked to text, logically organized information in a clear sequence, addressed all subtopics with adequate details, demonstrated accurate understanding of the cancer type, incorporated relevant terminology, and submitted 5 interesting questions that could be answered from the poster.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Cancer Poster Rubric22

    Uploaded by

    spare
    The document outlines criteria for evaluating a cancer group poster on presentation, 3D elements, diagrams, organization of information, research details, information quality, terminology, and submitted questions. A poster would receive a high rating if it was well laid out with clear headings and subheadings visible from 1 meter, included an eye-catching 3D element, had relevant diagrams clearly linked to text, logically organized information in a clear sequence, addressed all subtopics with adequate details, demonstrated accurate understanding of the cancer type, incorporated relevant terminology, and submitted 5 interesting questions that could be answered from the poster.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    CANCER GROUP POSTER

    NAMES _________________________ _________________________ __________________________

    TYPE OF CANCER _______________________________

    High Medium Low

    CRITERIA

    Presentation
    An attractive poster that is well An attractive poster that is Poster is poorly set out and lacks
    Poster set out with a clear title and sub- generally well set out. clear headings/sub-headings
    headings visible from 1 metre

    You have included an eye- You have not included an


    3D Element catching 3D element that is well You have included an appropriate appropriate 3D element
    constructed and appropriate 3D element that is well
    constructed
    Diagrams Diagrams are included, most are Diagrams are included. They are Few if any diagrams are
    hand drawn. Diagrams are generally relevant to topic. included.
    relevant to the topic and clearly However, clear links to the text
    linked to text are missing and/or diagrams are
    too small.
    Organisation of Information is logically Information is generally well Information is in parts
    information organised and presented in a organised disorganised
    clearly set out sequence

    Amount of All sub-topics have been well Most sub-topics have been Inadequate number of sub-topics
    research addressed addressed in adequate detail addressed with a lack of detail
    information

    Quality of Information is relevant, accurate Most information is relevant, Information is frequently


    information and demonstrates a clear accurate and demonstrates an irrelevant and/or inaccurate and
    understanding of the particular understanding of the underlying fails to demonstrate an
    disease. ideas understanding of the underlying
    ideas
    Field of words A good number of ‘Field of Some ‘Field of words’ terms Few if any ‘Field of words’ terms
    words’ terms have been have been incorporated and have been incorporated and
    incorporated and highlighted on highlighted on the poster highlighted on the poster
    the poster
    Questions The required number of relevant Five relevant and interesting Questions were not submitted otr
    and interesting questions were questions were submitted that too late
    submitted on time, that could be could be answered from your
    answered from your poster poster, or late submission

    CANCER GROUP POSTER


    NAMES _________________________ _________________________ __________________________
    TYPE OF CANCER _______________________________

    High Medium Low

    CRITERIA

    Presentation
    An attractive poster that is well An attractive poster that is Poster is poorly set out and lacks
    Poster set out with a clear title and sub- generally well set out. clear headings/sub-headings
    headings visible from 1 metre

    You have included an eye- You have not included an


    3D Element catching 3D element that is well You have included an appropriate appropriate 3D element
    constructed and appropriate 3D element that is well
    constructed
    Diagrams Diagrams are included. Diagrams Diagrams are included. They are Few if any diagrams are
    are relevant to the topic and generally relevant to topic. included.
    clearly linked to text However, clear links to the text
    are missing and/or diagrams are
    too small.
    Organisation of Information is logically Information is generally well Information is in parts
    information organised and presented in a organised disorganised
    clearly set out sequence

    Amount of All sub-topics have been well Most sub-topics have been Inadequate number of sub-topics
    research addressed addressed in adequate detail addressed with a lack of detail
    information

    Quality of Information is relevant, accurate Most information is relevant, Information is frequently


    information and demonstrates a clear accurate and demonstrates an irrelevant and/or inaccurate and
    understanding of the particular understanding of the underlying fails to demonstrate an
    disease. ideas understanding of the underlying
    ideas
    Field of words A good number of ‘Field of Some ‘Field of words’ terms Few if any ‘Field of words’ terms
    words’ terms have been have been incorporated and have been incorporated and
    incorporated and highlighted on highlighted on the poster highlighted on the poster
    the poster
    Questions 5 relevant and interesting 4 or less relevant and interesting Questions were not submitted or
    questions were submitted that questions were submitted that too late
    could be answered from your could be answered from your
    poster poster

    You might also like