EN BANC

 
IN THE MATTER OF THE BREWING A.M. No. 09-5-2-SC
CONTROVERSIES IN THE ELECTION
IN THE INTEGRATED BAR OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
x--------------------------------------------------x
ATTYS. MARCIAL M. MAGSINO, A.C. No. 8292
MANUEL M. MARAMBA and
NASSER MAROHOMSALIC,
Complainants,
Present:
 
CORONA, C.J.,
CARPIO,
CARPIO MORALES,
*
VELASCO, JR.,
NACHURA,
LEONARDO-DE CASTRO,
- v e r s u s - BRION,*
PERALTA,
BERSAMIN,
DEL CASTILLO,
ABAD,
VILLARAMA, JR.,
PEREZ,
MENDOZA and
SERENO, JJ.
 
ATTYS. ROGELIO A. VINLUAN,
ABELARDO C. ESTRADA, BONIFACIO
T. BARANDON, JR., EVERGISTO S.
ESCALON and RAYMUND JORGE A.
MERCADO,
Respondents.
Promulgated:
 
December 14, 2010
 
 
 
 
 
x- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
 
RESOLUTION
CORONA, C.J.:
 
 This resolves the above matter involving the leadership controversy at the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP)
and the administrative case that was filed against some of the high-ranking officers of the IBP on account thereof.
 
I. Antecedents
 
The Court in an En Banc Resolution dated June 2, 2009 created a Special (Investigating) Committee [1] to look into
the brewing controversies in the IBP elections, specifically in the elections of Vice-President for the Greater Manila
Region and Executive Vice-President of the IBP itself xxx and any other election controversy involving other chapters of
the IBP, if any, that includes as well the election of the Governors for Western Mindanao and Western Visayas.
Consequently, the Special Committee called the IBP officers involved to a preliminary conference on June 10,
2009. With respect thereto, Atty. Rogelio A. Vinluan then submitted a Preliminary Conference Brief on the same day.
During the conference it was determined that the investigation would focus on the following issues or controversies:
 
1. What is the correct interpretation of Section 31, Article V of the IBP By-Laws which provides:
 
SEC. 31. Membership. The membership (of Delegates) shall consist of all the
Chapter Presidents and, in the case of Chapters entitled to more than one Delegate each,
the Vice-Presidents of the Chapters and such additional Delegates as the Chapters are
entitled to. Unless the Vice-President is already a Delegate, he shall be an alternate
Delegate. Additional Delegates and alternates shall in proper cases be elected by the
Board of Officers of the Chapter. Members of the Board of Governors who are not
Delegates shall be members ex officio of the House, without the right to vote.
 
2. Who was validly elected Governor for the Greater Manila Region?
 
3. Who was validly elected Governor for Western Visayas Region?
 
4. Who was validly elected Governor for Western Mindanao Region?
 
5. Who was validly elected IBP Executive Vice President for the next term?
 
6. What is the liability, if any, of respondent Atty. Rogelio A. Vinluan under the administrative complaint
for grave professional misconduct, violation of attorneys oath, and acts inimical to the IBP filed against
him by Attys. Marcial Magsino, Manuel Maramba and Nasser Marohomsalic?
 
 
Meanwhile, a Supplemental Complaint dated June 11, 2009 was received from Attys. Magsino, Maramba and
Marohomsalic regarding the earlier complaint that they filed last May 21, 2009 against Atty. Vinluan.
 
As such, then IBP President Feliciano M. Bautista and then Executive Vice President (EVP) Vinluan agreed to
submit their respective position papers on the above issues and controversies. Also, Atty. Vinluan was required to file his
answer to the administrative complaint against him.
 
A Position Paper dated June 15, 2009 was then received from Atty. Vinluan. Attys. Elpidio G. Soriano, III and Erwin M.
Fortunato also filed their Position Papers both dated June 15, 2009. It appears that an earlier Position Paper also dated
June 15, 2009 was submitted by Atty. Benjamin B. Lanto.
 
 For their part, Attys. Bautista, Maramba and Magsino filed their Position Paper dated June 16, 2009. Incidentally,
in a Manifestation likewise dated June 16, 2009 Attys. Bautista, Maramba and Marcial M. Magsino submitted the same
paper but already bearing the signature of Atty. Bautista.
Atty. Nasser A. Marohomsalic submitted his Position Paper dated June 17, 2009. The Special Committee, in the course of
its investigation, further received a letter dated June 22, 2009 from Atty. Alex L. Macalawi, President of the IBP Lanao
del Sur Chapter.
 
As to the administrative case filed against him, Atty. Vinluan, as respondent, filed his Comment dated June 15, 2009. In
turn, Attys. Magsino, Maramba and Marohomsalic, as complainants, submitted their Reply dated June 23, 2009.
The Special Committee then submitted a Report and Recommendation dated July 9, 2009 the dispositive portion of which
read as follows:
 
A. That to avoid further controversy regarding its proper interpretation and
implementation, Sec. 31, Article V, of the By-Laws should be amended as follows (suggested
amendments are in bold print):
 
SEC. 31. Membership. The membership of the House of Delegates shall consist of all
the Chapter Presidents and in the case of Chapters entitled to mo(r)e than on(e) Delegate each,
the Vice President of the Chapters and such additional Delegates as the Chapters are entitled
to. Unless the Vice President is already (a) delegate, he shall be an alternate
Delegate. Additional Delegates and their respective alternates shall be elected from, and
by, the Board of Officers of the Chapter. If the Delegate chosen is incapacitated, or
disqualified, or resigns, or refuses to serve, and there are enough members of the Board
to be elected as Delegates, then the Board of Officers shall elect the additional delegates
and alternates from the general membership of the Chapter, and his corresponding
alternate shall take his place.
 
B. That to avoid any ambiguity as to how the President shall preside and vote in
meetings of the House of Delegates, paragraph (g), Sec. 33, Article V of the By-Laws should be
amended as follows:
 
(g) In all meetings and deliberations of the House, whether in annual or special
convention, the President shall preside, or the Executive Vice President, if the President is
absent or incapacitated, but neither of them shall vote except to break a tie.
 
C. Similarly, Sec. 42, Article VI of the By-Laws, on meetings of the Board of Governors,
should be amended to read as follows:
 
Sec. 42. Meetings. The Board shall meet regularly once a month, on such date and
such time and place as it shall designate. Special meetings may be called by the President, and
shall be called by him upon the written request of five (5) members of the Board. The President
shall not vote except to break a tie in the voting. When for any reason, the President
cannot preside on account of his absence, incapacity, or refusal to call a meeting, the
Executive Vice President shall preside, there being a quorum to transact business, but
he may not vote except to break a tie.
 
D. That Sec. 43, Article VI of the By-Laws, on the procedure for approving a resolution
by the Board of Governors without a meeting, should be amended by adding the following
 exception thereto so that the procedure may not be abused in connection with any election in
the IBP:
 
This provision shall not apply when the Board shall hold an election
or hear and decide an election protest.
 
E. That the provision for the strict implementation of the rotation rule among the Chapters in the
Regions for the election of the Governor for the regions, (as ordered by this Honorable Court in
Bar Matter No. 586, May 14, 1991) should be incorporated in Sec. 39, Article VI of the By-Laws,
as follows:
 
Sec. 39. Nomination and election of the Governors. At least one (1) month before the
national convention the delegates from each region shall elect the Governor for their
region, who shall be chosen by rotation which is mandatory and shall be strictly
implemented among the Chapters in the region. When a Chapter waives its turn in the
rotation order, its place shall redound to the next Chapter in the line. Nevertheless, the
former may reclaim its right to the Governorship at any time before the rotation is
completed; otherwise, it will have to wait for its turn in the next round, in the same place
that it had in the round completed.
 
F. That in view of the fact that the IBP no longer elects its President, because the Executive
Vice President automatically succeeds the President at the end of his term, Sec. 47, Article VII
of the By-Laws should be amended by deleting the provision for the election of the President.
Moreover, for the strict implementation of the rotation rule, the Committee recommends that
there should be a sanction for its violation, thus:
 
Sec. 47. National Officers. The Integrated Bar of the Philippines shall have a
President, an Executive Vice President, and nine (9) regional Governors. The
Executive Vice President shall be elected on a strict rotation basis by the
Board of Governors from among themselves, by the vote of at least five (5)
Governors. The Governors shall be ex officio Vice President for their respective
regions. There shall also be a Secretary and Treasurer of the Board of
Governors.
 
The violation of the rotation rule in any election shall be penalized by
annulment of the election and disqualification of the offender from election
or appointment to any office in the IBP.
 
G. That Atty. Manuel M. Maramba should be declared the duly elected Governor of the Greater
Manila Region for the 2009-2011 term.
 
H. That Atty. Erwin Fortunato of the Romblon Chapter should be declared the duly elected
Governor of the Western Visayas Region for the 2009-2011 term.
 
I. That a special election should be held in the Western Mindanao Region, within fifteen (15)
days from notice, to elect the Governor of that region for the 2009-2011 term. In accordance
with the rotation rule, only the six (6) Chapters in the region that have not yet been elected to
the Board of Governors, namely: Zamboanga Sibugay, Zamboanga del Norte, Za(m)boanga del
 Sur, Lanao del Norte, Misamis Occidental, and Maguindanao-Cotabato City, shall participate in
the election.
 
J. That, thereafter, a special election should also be held by the Board of Governors to elect the
Executive Vice President for the 2009-2011 term with strict observance of the rotation rule.
Inasmuch as for the past nine (9) terms, i.e., since the 1991-1993 term, the nominees of the
Western Visayas and Eastern Mindanao Regions have not yet been elected Executive Vice
President of the IBP, the special election shall choose only between the nominees of these two
(2) regions who shall become the Executive Vice President for the 2009-2011 term, in
accordance with the strict rotation rule.
 
K. That the high-handed and divisive tactics of Atty. Rogelio A. Vinluan and his group of
Governors, Abelardo Estrada, Bonifacio Barandon, Jr., Evergisto Escalon, and Raymund
Mercado, which disrupted the peaceful and orderly flow of business in the IBP, caused chaos in
the National Office, bitter disagreements, and ill-feelings, and almost disintegrated the
Integrated Bar, constituted grave professional misconduct which should be appropriately
sanctioned to discourage its repetition in the future.
II. Findings of the Special Committee
 
In its Report and Recommendation dated July 9, 2009, the Special Committee disclosed when it was discussing the Board
of Officers of each chapter that:
 
The government of a Chapter is vested in its Board of Officers composed of nine (9) officers,
namely: the President, Vice-President, Secretary, Treasurer, and five (5) Directors who shall be
elected by the members of the Chapter at the biennial meeting on the last Saturday of February,
and shall hold office for a term of two (2) years from the first day of April following their election
and until their successors shall have been duly chosen and qualified. For the 2009-2011 term,
the election of Chapter officers was held on February 28, 2009.
 
In 1983 up to 1995, the Quezon City Chapter elected the usual nine (9) officers to its Board of
Officers and they were all delegates to the House of Delegates. Beginning with the 1997-1999
term, when it added a Public Relations Officer (P.R.O.) and Auditor to its Board of Officers, the
number of delegates allotted to the Chapter was also increased to eleven (11) like the
membership in its Board of Officers, pursuant to a reapportionment of delegates by the Board of
Governors under Sec. 30, Art. V of the By-Laws.
 
Up to the 2007-2009 term, all the officers of the QC Chapter were also the Chapters delegates
to the House of Delegates. Atty. Victoria Loanzon who has been an officer of the Chapter in
various capacities since 2003, like her fellow officers in the Board, automatically became a
delegate since 2003 up to this time.
 
For the 2009-2011 term, the Board of Officers of the IBP-QC Chapter that assumed office on
April 1, 2009, is composed of six (6) officers and (5) directors, namely:
 
President - - - - - - - - - - Tranquil Salvador III
Vice President - - - - - - Jonas Cabochan
Secretary - - - - - - - - - - Christian Fernandez
Treasurer - - - - - - - - - - Victoria Loanzon
Auditor - - - - - - - - - - - Ginger Anne Castillo
 P.R.O. - - - - - - - - - - - - Ernesto Tabujara III
Director - - - - - - - - - - - Annalou Nachura
Director - - - - - - - - - - - Melody Sampaga
Director - - - - - - - - - - - Francois Rivera
Director - - - - - - - - - - - Joseph Cerezo
Director - - - - - - - - - - - Marita Iris Laqui
 
It is important to be an officer of ones Chapter and a delegate to the House of Delegates,
because a delegate gets to elect the Governor for the Region (which must rotate among the
Chapters in the region). The Governor of the Region becomes a member of the Board of
Governors, and gets to elect, or be elected, as the next IBP Executive Vice President who
automatically becomes President for the next succeeding term (which must also rotate among
the Regions).[2]
 
 
The Special Committee then pointed out that with respect to the IBP Board of Governors this consists of nine (9)
Governors from the nine (9) Regions. One (1) Governor for each Region shall be elected by the members of the House of
Delegates from that region only. The Governors, the President and the Executive Vice-President shall hold office for a
term of two (2) years from July 1 immediately following their election, up to June 30 of their second year in office and
until their successors shall have been duly chosen and qualified. It was further added by the Committee that:
 
At least one (1) month before the national convention, the delegates from each Region shall
elect the Governor for their region. The IBP By-Laws provide that starting in 1993-1995, the
principle on rotation shall be strictly implemented so that all prior elections for Governor in
the region shall be reckoned with or considered in determining who should be Governor to be
selected from the different chapters to represent the region in the Board of Governors. Hence,
the governorship of the region shall rotate among the chapters in the region.
The Governors-elect shall, by a vote of at least five (5), choose an Executive Vice-President, x x
x either from among themselves or from other members of the Integrated Bar. The Executive
Vice-President shall automatically become President for the next succeeding term. The
Presidency shall rotate among the nine (9) Regions.[3]
 
 
According to the Committee, the rotation of the position of Governor of a region among the Chapters was
ordered by the Supreme Court in its Resolution dated May 14, 1991 in Bar Matter No. 586 (Clarification Re:
Bar Matter No. 491, Atty. Romulo T. Capulong petitioner). With respect thereto, it was revealed that:
 
Pursuant to the principle of rotation, the governorship of a region shall rotate once in as many
terms as the number of chapters there are in the region, to give every chapter a chance to
represent the region in the Board of Governors. Thus, in a region composed of 5 chapters, each
chapter is entitled to the governorship once in every 5 terms, or once every ten (10) years, since
a term is two (2) years.
 
The record of the National IBP Secretariat shows that during the past five (5) terms, from 1999
up to 2009, the GMR (Greater Manila Region) governorship was occupied by the five (5)
chapters of the region as follows:
 
1999-2001 ----- Jose P. Icaonapo ------------ Manila III
2001-2003 ----- Santos V. Catubay, Jr. ---- QuezonCity
 2003-2005 ----- Rosario Setias-Reyes ------ Manila II
2005-2007 ----- Alicia A. Risos-Vidal ------ Manila I
2007-2009 ----- Marcial M. Magsino ------- Manila IV
 
In the next round, which starts with the 2009-2011 term, the same order of rotation should be
followed by the five (5) chapters, i.e., Manila III shall begin the round, to be followed by Quezon
City for 2011-2013 term, Manila for the 2013-2015 term, Manila I for the 2015-2017 term, and
Manila IV for the 2017-2019 term.
 
In the Western Visayas Region which is composed of ten (10) chapters, each chapter is entitled
to represent the governorship of the region once every ten (10) terms. The first chapter to
occupy the governorship, must wait for the nine (9) other chapters to serve their respective
terms, before it may have its turn again as Governor of the region.
 
The same rule applies to the Western Mindanao Region which is composed of twelve (12)
chapters.
 
On April 25, 2009, the election of Governors for the nine (9) IBP regions proceeded as
scheduled, presided over by their respective outgoing Governor.[4]
 
 
It was then cited by the Special Committee that Sec. 47, Art. VII of the By-Laws, as amended by Bar Matter 491, Oct. 6,
1989, provides that the Executive Vice President shall be chosen by the Board of Governors from among the nine (9)
regional governors. The Executive Vice President shall automatically become President for the next succeeding term. The
Presidency shall rotate among the nine Regions. Further, the Committee averred that:
 
The list of national presidents furnished the Special Committee by the IBP National Secretariat,
shows that the governors of the following regions were President of the IBP during the past nine
(9) terms (1991-2009):
 
Numeriano Tanopo, Jr. (Pangasinan) --- Central Luzon --- 1991-1993
Mervin G. Encanto (Quezon City) ------ Manila ------------ 1993-1995
Raul R. Angangco (Makati) -------------- Southern Luzon - 1995-1997
Jose Aguila Grapilon (Biliran) ----------- Eastern Visayas 1997-1999
Arthur D. Lim (Zambasulta) ------------- Western Mindanao-1999-2001
Teofilo S. Pilando, Jr. (Kalinga-Apayao)-Northern Luzon 2001-2003
Jose Anselmo I. Cadiz (Camarines Sur) Bicolandia -------- 2003-2005
Jose Anselmo I. Cadiz (Camarines Sur) Bicolandia ----2005-Aug 2006
Jose Vicente B. Salazar (Albay) ---------- Bicolandia --- Aug. 2006-2007
Feliciano M. Bautista (Pangasinan) ------ Central Luzon ---- 2007-2009
Only the governors of the Western Visayas and Eastern Mindanao regions have not yet had
their turn as Executive Vice President cum next IBP President, while Central Luzon and
Bicolandia have had two (2) terms already.
 
Therefore, either the governor of the Western Visayas Region, or the governor of the Eastern
Mindanao Region should be elected as Executive Vice-President for the 2009-2011 term. The
one who is not chosen for this term, shall have his turn in the next (2011-2013) term.
Afterwards, another rotation shall commence with Greater Manila in the lead, followed by
 Southern Luzon, Eastern Visayas, Western Mindanao, Northern Luzon, Bicolandia, Central
Luzon, and either Western Visayas or Eastern Mindanao at the end of the round.[5]
The Committee then disclosed that the controversies involved herein and should be resolved are the following: (I) the
dispute concerning additional delegates of the QC Chapter to the House of Delegates; (II) the election of the Governor for
the Greater Manila Region (GMR); (III) the election of Governor for the Western Visayas Region; (IV) the election of
Governor for the Western Mindanao Region; (V) the resolution of the election protests; (VI) the election of the IBP
Executive Vice President for the 2009-2011 term; and, (VII) the administrative complaint against EVP Rogelio Vinluan.
 
In addressing the above controversies, the Committee arrived at the following findings and conclusions:
I. The silence of Sec. 31, Art. V of the IBP By-Laws on who may be elected as additional
delegates and alternates by the remaining members of the Board of Officers of the
Chapter when the Chapter is entitled to more than two (2) delegates to the House of Delegates,
is the root cause of the conflicting resolutions of the Bautista and Vinluan factions on the proper
interpretation of the aforementioned provision of the By-Laws.
 
According to the Resolution No. XVIII-2009 dated April 17, 2009 of the Bautista Group, the
additional delegate/s shall be elected by the Board of Officers of the Chapter only from among
the remaining duly elected officers and members of the Board, in consideration of their mandate
from the general membership.
 
According to the Resolution No. XVIII-2009 (Special-23 April 2009) of the Vinluan Group, the
election of the additional delegate/s for the Chapters entitled to more than two (2) delegates
shall be elected by the Board of Officers of the Chapter from among the general membership
who are in good standing to include the remaining duly elected officers and members of the
Board.
 
The Committee finds the qualification introduced by Resolution No. XVIII-2009 that the
additional delegate/s and alternates must be elected from among the remaining officers
of the Chapter to be consistent with the precedent set by Section 31 itself in
appointing members of the Board of Officers, namely, (a) the president of the Chapter as the
delegate, and the vice president as the alternate, or second, delegate to the House of
Delegates, when the Chapter is entitled to two (2) delegates. There is a manifest intention in
Sec. 31, Art. V of the By-Laws to reserve membership in the House of Delegates (which is the
deliberative body of the IBP) for the elected officers of the Chapter since they have already
received the mandate of the general membership of the Chapter.
 
For the past four (4) terms (2003-2011), Atty. Loanzon has been an officer and delegate of the
QC Chapter to the House of Delegates, until the Vinluan Group introduced its own interpretation
of the aforementioned provision of the By-Laws and elected non-officers of the Chapter as
delegates to the House of Delegates in lieu of herself and Atty. Laqui.
 
We find the Vinluan Groups interpretation of Sec. 31, Art. V, of the By-Laws in Resolution No.
XVIII-2009 (Special 23 April 2009) to be in error and devoid of rational and historical bases.
 
II. Attys. Victoria Loanzon and Marite Laqui were properly recognized as delegates of the
QC Chapter by the Presiding Officer, GMR Governor Marcial Magsino, during the election on
April 25, 2009 of the Governor for the Greater Manila Region, in accordance with the guideline
in Resolution No. XVIII-2009.
 
The argument of the QC-Chapter President Tranquil Salvador, that Attys. Loanzon and Laqui
were not delegates because they were not elected by the QC-Board of Officers, is not well
taken.
 
Sec. 31, Art. V of the By-Laws provides that:
Additional Delegates and alternates shall in proper cases be elected by the
Board of Officers of the Chapter.
 
The QC Chapter is not a proper case for the election of additional delegates by the Board of
Officers because the Chapter is entitled to the same number of delegates (11) to the House, as
the number of officers in its Board of Officers. Its officers are ipso facto the Chapters delegates
to the House. There is no need for the Board of Officers to conduct an election.
 
A proper case for the election of additional delegates and alternates by the Board of Officers
occurs when the number of additional delegates and alternates for the Chapter is less than the
members of the Board of Officers, for, then, the Board of Officers must select, and elect, who
among themselves should be the additional delegate/s and alternates of the Chapter to the
House of Delegates. That has never been the case of the QC Chapter.
 
III. Atty. Manuel Maramba (Manila III Chapter) was validly elected as GMR Governor for
the 2009-2011 term, not only because he outvoted his rival, Atty. Elpidio Soriano (Quezon City
Chapter), but also because under the principle of rotation of the governorship (Bar Matter No.
586, May 14, 1991) since the five (5) chapters of the Greater Manila Region have all
represented the region in the Board of Governors during the past five (5) terms, in the following
order:
 
1999-2001 -------- Manila III -------- Jose P. Icaonapo
2001-2003 -------- Quezon City ----- Santos V. Catubay, Jr.
2003-2005 -------- Manila II ---------- Rosario Setias-Reyes
2005-2007 -------- Manila I ----------- Alicia A. Risos-Vidal
2007-2009 -------- Manila IV --------- Marcial M. Magsino
 
it is now the turn of the representative of the Manila III Chapter to sit again in the Board of
Governors for the next round which begins in the 2009-2011 term. The Manila III representative,
Atty. Manuel M. Maramba, has every right to the position not only because he won the election
with 13 votes in his favor against 12 for Atty. Soriano, but also because his election follows the
rotation rule decreed by the Supreme Court.
 
On the other hand, the election of Atty. Soriano (QC Chapter) in the special election that was
presided over by EVP Vinluan on May 4, 2009, was a nullity on three (3) grounds: First,
because Atty. Soriano already lost the election on April 25, 2009. Second, the special election
conducted by the Vinluan Group on May 4, 2(00)8 was illegal because it was not called nor
presided over by the regional Governor. Third, Atty. Soriano is disqualified to run for GMR
Governor for the 2009-2011 term because his election as such would violate the rotation rule
which the Supreme Court requires to be strictly implemented. Under the rotation rule, the GMR
governorship for the 2009-2011 term belongs to the Manila III Chapter, not to the QC Chapter,
whose turn will come two (2) years later, in 2011-2013 yet.
 
IV. Atty. Erwin Fortunato of the Romblon Chapter was duly elected as Governor for the
Western Visayas Region for the 2009-2011 term, not only because he obtained the highest
number of votes among the three (3) candidates for the position, but also because under the
rotation rule, it is now the turn of the Romblon Chapter to represent the Western Visayas Region
in the IBP Board of Governors.
 
The contention of the protestants, Attys. Cornelio Aldon (Antique Chapter) and Benjamin Ortega
(Negros Occidental Chapter) that the rotation rule in Sections 37 and 39 of the IBP By-Laws is
not mandatory but only directory, betrays their ignorance of the resolution of the Supreme Court
in Bar Matter No. 586 dated May 16, 1991, ruling that the principle on rotation shall be strictly
implemented so that all prior elections for governor in the region shall be reckoned with or
considered in determining who should be the governor to be selected from the different chapters
to represent the region in the Board of Governors.
 
V. Neither Atty. Nasser Marohomsalic nor Atty. Benjamin Lanto is qualified to be elected
Governor of Western Mindanao Region. Sec. 39, Art. VI of the IBP By-Laws provides that:
Starting in 1993-1995, the principle of rotation in the position of governor among the different
chapters to represent the region in the Board of Governors shall be strictly implemented.
 
Under Sec. 37, Art. VI of the By-Laws, the Governor of a region shall be elected by the
members of the House of Delegates from that region only. Since the delegate of a Chapter to
the House of Delegates is the President of the Chapter, not the Board of Officers, the nominee
of the Chapter President, not the nominee of the Board of Officers, is the valid nominee for
Governor of the Region.
 
However, under the rotation rule, it is not the Lanao del Sur Chapter that should represent
the Western Mindanao Region in the Board of Governors for the 2009-2011 term. The
record of the IBP National Secretariat shows that, starting in 1993-1995 when the strict
implementation of the rotation rule began, the 12-chapter Western Mindanao Region has been
represented in the Board of Governors by only six (6) Chapters, as follows:
 
1993-1995 ----- Lanao del Sur ------ Dimnatang T. Saro
1995-1997 ----- Cotabato ------------ George C. Jabido
1997-1999 ----- ZAMBASULTA -- Arthur D. Lim
1999-2001 ----- ZAMBASULTA -- Paulino R. Ersando
2001-2003 ----- North Cotabato --- Little Sarah A. Agdeppa
2003-2005 ----- Sultan Kudarat ---- Carlos L. Valdez, Jr.
2005-2007 ----- SOCSARGEN ----- Rogelio C. Garcia
2007-2009 ----- Sultan Kudarat ---- Carlos L. Valdez, Jr.
 
Therefore, pursuant to the strict rotation, the Lanao del Sur Chapter must wait for the six (6)
other Chapters in the region (Zamboanga Sibugay, Zamboanga del Norte, Zamboanga del Sur,
Lanao del Norte, Misamis Occidental, and Maguindanao-Cotabato City) to have their turn in the
Board of Governors before Lanao del Sur may again represent the Western Mindanao Region
in the Board of Governors.
 
Since both Attys. Nasser Marohomsalic and B(e)njamin Lanto belong to the Lanao del Sur
Chapter, both of them are disqualified to be elected as Governor of the Western Mindanao
Region for the 2009-2011 term. With respect to Atty. Benjamin Lanto, his nomination by the
 Board of Officers was not only invalid, but also lost credibility after three (3), out of the thirteen
(13) signatories to his nomination, resigned from the Board of Officers, and six (6) others signed
authorizations in favor of Atty. Macalawi authorizing him to nominate and elect the Governor for
the Western Mindanao Region. That left only four (4) votes in favor of his nomination for
Governor of the Western Mindanao Region.
 
VI. The elections for the IBP Executive Vice President separately held on May 9, 2009 by
the Bautista and Vinluan Groups were null and void for lack of quorum. The presence of
five (5) Governors-elect is needed to constitute a quorum of the 9-member Board of Governors-
elect who shall elect the Executive Vice President.
 
As previously stated, there were two (2) simultaneous elections for the Executive Vice President
for the 2009-2011 term one was called and presided over by EVP Vinluan in the Board Room of
the IBP National Office, while the other election for the same position was presided over by
outgoing IBP Pres. Bautista in another room of the same building, at the same time, 9:00 A.M.,
on the same date, May 9, 2009.
 
Those present at the meeting of the Vinluan Group were:
 
1. Atty. Elpidio G. Soriano
2. Atty. Benjamin B. Lanto
3. Atty. Amador Tolentino, Jr., Governor-elect for Southern Luzon
4. Atty. Jose V. Cabrera, Governor-elect for Bicolandia
5. Atty. Erwin Fortunato, Governor-elect for Western Visayas
6. Atty. Roland B. Inting, Governor-elect for Eastern Visayas
 
Since both Attys. Soriano and Lanto were not validly elected as Governors respectively of the
Greater Manila Region and the Western Mindanao Region, they were disqualified to sit in the
incoming Board of Governors and participate in the election of the succeeding Executive Vice
President. The remaining four (4) Governors-elect Governors Tolentino, Cabrera, Fortunato,
and Inting, did not constitute a quorum of the Board of Governors to conduct a valid election of
the IBP Executive Vice President. The election of Atty. Elpidio G. Soriano as Executive Vice
President by the Vinluan Group was invalid. Aside from lack of a quorum to conduct the
elections, EVP Vinluan wrongly presided over the election. Thus, Atty. Soriano was not duly
elected as Governor of the Greater Manila Region, hence, he is disqualified to sit in the Board of
Governors.
 
Neither did the meeting of the Bautista Group fare any better, for those present were:
 
1.    Atty. Milagros Fernan-Cayosa, Governor-elect for Northern
Luzon
2. Atty. Ferdinand Y. Miclat, Governor-elect for Central Luzon
3. Atty. Manuel M. Maramba, Governor-elect for Greater Manila
4. Atty. Roan Libarios, Governor-elect for Eastern Mindanao
5. Atty. Nasser Marohomsalic
 
Atty. Marohomsalics election as Governor for Western Mindanao was invalid for violating the
rotation rule. The four (4) remaining governors-elect (Attys. Cayosa, Miclat, Maramba and
Libarios) like those in the Vinluan Group, did not constitute a quorum to conduct the election of
the IBP Executive Vice President for the current term. The election of Governor Roan Libarios
as Executive Vice President by this group was therefore null and void.
 
Besides that flaw in his election, since the Eastern Visayas Region, represented by Governor
Jose Aguila Grapilon of Biliran, had succeeded to the presidency in 1997-1999, its next turn will
come after the eight (8) other regions shall have also served in the presidency. That will be after
sixteen years, or, in 2015-2017 yet.
 
VII. The administrative complaint against EVP Rogelio A. Vinluan and his Group of
Governors (Abelardo Estrada of Northern Luzon, Bonifacio Barandon of Bicolandia,
Evergisto Escalon of Eastern Visayas, and Raymund Mercado of Western Visayas) is
meritorious, for their conduct was fractious and high-handed, causing disunity and acrimonious
disagreements in the IBP.
 
1. The request of the EVP Vinluans Group for a special meeting of the Board of Governors on
April 23, 2009 two (2) days before the scheduled election of the regional Governors on April 25,
2009 when IBP Pres. Bautista was in Zamboanga on IBP business, and the other Governors
had just returned to their respective regions to prepare for the April 25 election of the regional
governors, was unreasonable.
 
The special meeting on April 23, 2009 which he himself presided over, violated Sec. 42, Art. VI
of the By-Laws which provides that it is the President who shall call a special meeting, and it is
also the President who shall preside over the meeting, not Atty. Vinluan (Sec. 50, Art. VII, By-
Laws).
 
The proper recourse for the Vinluan Group, in view of President Bautistas refusal to call a
special meeting as requested by them, is found in Section 43, Art. VI of the By-Laws which
provides that-
 
The Board may take action, without a meeting, by resolution signed by at least
five Governors provided that every member of the Board shall have been
previously apprised of the contents of the resolution.
But the Vinluan Group ignored that procedure. They held a special meeting on April 23,
2009, where they adopted Resolution No. XVIII-2009 (Special-23 April 2009) striking out
as ultra vires the earlier Resolution No. XVIII-2009 passed in the regular monthly meeting of the
Board of Governors on April 17, 2009. That meeting was illegal, hence, the resolution adopted
therein was null and void.
 
2. The second special meeting held by the Vinluan Group on April 30, 2009 wherein they
approved Resolution XVIII-2009 (Special-A-30 April 2009) resolving the election protests in the
GMR, Western Visayas and Western Mindanao governors elections, with complete disregard for
the protestees right to due process, was likewise illegal, hence, the Groups resolution of the
election protests was likewise null and void, and the new election of the GMR Governor which
they set on May 4, 2009 was invalid.
 
3. The Board Resolution which was adopted and faxed to the Governors-elect on May 8, 2009,
by the Vinluan Group, setting the election of the IBP Executive Vice President on May 9, 2009,
at 9:00 A.M.; declaring Pres. Bautista unfit to preside over the election and designating EVP
Vinluan to preside over the election in lieu of Pres. Bautista, was uncalled and unwarranted, and
 caused disunity and disorder in the IBP. It was in effect a coup to unseat Pres. Bautista before
the end of his term, and prematurely install EVP Vinluan as president.
 
The actuations of Atty. Vinluans Group in defying the lawful authority of IBP President Bautista,
due to Atty. Vinluans overweening desire to propel his fraternity brother, Atty. Elpidio G.
Soriano, to the next presidency of the IBP, smacked of politicking, which is strongly condemned
and strictly prohibited by the IBP By-Laws and the Bar Integration Rule.[6]
 
Again, it must be noted that while the pending administrative case against Atty. Vinluan and his co-respondents has not
yet been resolved, Atty. Vinluan was not allowed to assume his position as President of the IBP for 2009-2011. Instead,
the Supreme Court designated retired Supreme Court Associate Justice Santiago Kapunan as Officer-in-Charge of the
IBP.
 
III. Rulings of the Court
The Court completely agrees with the recommendations of the Special Committee with respect to, among others, the
following:
 
1. Declaring Atty. Manuel M. Maramba (Manila III Chapter) as the duly elected Governor of the Greater Manila Region
for the 2009-2011 term[7]; and,
2. Declaring Atty. Erwin M. Fortunato (Romblon Chapter) as the duly elected Governor of the Western Visayas Region
for the 2009-2011 term[8].
 
As far as the Court is concerned, there is no dispute that the election of Atty. Maramba was in order. During the election
held last April 25, 2009 which was duly presided over by then outgoing Greater Manila Region Governor Marcial
Magsino, it was Atty. Maramba who garnered the highest number of votes among the delegates compared to Atty.
Soriano, 13 votes to 12 votes. However, instead of accepting the said defeat graciously, Atty. Soriano then filed an
election protest on April 27, 2009 claiming that the said election was void because there were non-delegates, particularly
Attys. Loanzon and Laqui of the Quezon City Chapter, who were allowed to vote. Consequently, Atty. Soriano got a
favorable ruling from the group of Atty. Vinluan, as EVP, and former Governors Estrada (Northern Luzon), Barandon, Jr.
(Bicolandia), Escalon (Eastern Visayas) and Mercado (Western Visayas) per Resolution No. XVIII-2009 (Special A-30
April 2009). This then resulted in the anomalous election of Atty. Soriano as Governor of the Greater Manila Region last
May 4, 2009.
 
In addressing the said controversy, and as already discussed, the Committee concluded that the Vinluan Groups
interpretation of Sec. 31, Art. V, of the By-Laws in Resolution No. XVIII-2009 (Special-23 April 2009) to be in error and
devoid of rational and historical bases. It was then pointed out that (t)he argument of the QC-Chapter President Tranquil
Salvador, (as well as by Atty. Soriano), that Attys. Loanzon and Laqui were not delegates because they were not elected
by the QC-Board of Officers, is not well taken. Likewise, the Committee considered the situation then involving the
Quezon City Chapter as not a proper case for the election of additional delegates by the Board of Officers because the
Chapter is entitled to the same number of delegates (11) to the House (of Delegates), as the number of officers in its Board
of Officers. Its officers are ipso facto the Chapters delegates to the House. There is no need for the Board of Officers to
conduct an election.
 
Thus, and as rightly determined by the Committee to which the Court subscribes to, the election of Atty. Soriano (QC
Chapter) in the special election that was presided over by EVP Vinluan on May 4, 2009, was a nullity on three (3)
grounds: First, because Atty. Soriano already lost the election on April 25, 2009. Second, the special election conducted
by the Vinluan Group on May 4, 2(009) was illegal because it was not called nor presided by the regional Governor (Atty.
Magsino). Third, Atty. Soriano is disqualified to run for GMR Governor for the 2009-2011 term because his election as
such would violate the rotation rule which the Supreme Court requires to be strictly implemented. This being so, since he
was not a duly elected Governor of the Greater Manila Region, then Atty. Soriano cannot be voted as well as IBP
Executive Vice President for 2009-2011.
 
With respect to the case of Atty. Fortunato, his election as Governor for the Western Visayas Region was upheld since he
obtained the highest number of votes among the three (3) candidates for the position and also because under the rotation
rule, it is now the turn of the Romblon Chapter to represent the Western Visayas Region in the IBP Board of Governors.
On account thereof, the Court is convinced that the contentions of protestees Attys. Cornelio Aldon (Antique Chapter) and
Benjamin Ortega (Negros Occidental Chapter) cannot prosper. After all, the Court already upheld per its Resolution in
Bar Matter No. 586 dated May 16, 1991 that the rotation rule under Sections 37 and 39 of the IBP By-Laws shall be
strictly implemented so that all prior elections for governor in the region shall be reckoned with or considered in
determining who should be the governor to be selected from the different chapters to represent the region in the Board of
Governors. More so, when the concerned chapter invoked its right thereto as in the case of Atty. Fortunato who came
from the Romblon Chapter which was next in the rotation.
 
To the Court, the election of Atty. Fortunato as Governor last April 25, 2009 is well-settled. He did not only come from
the chapter which is entitled to be elected for the said position, but also got the highest number of votes among the
candidates that included protestees Attys. Aldon and Ortega. As the election was presided over by then outgoing Governor
Raymund Mercado, the Court finds no cogent reason as well to reverse the findings of the Committee insofar as
upholding the election of Atty. Fortunato is concerned. Suffice it to say, the Committee was correct in not finding any
anomaly with respect thereto.
 
On the nullification of the election of Atty. Nasser Marohomsalic as Governor for the Western Mindanao Region,
the Court does not agree with the recommendation of the Committee to hold a special election in the said region [9].
Instead, the Court rules to uphold the election of Atty. Marohomsalic last April 25, 2009 which was presided over by then
outgoing Governor Carlos Valdez, Jr.
 
It must be pointed out that Atty. Marohomsalic was duly nominated by Atty. Alex Macalawi, President of the Lanao del
Sur Chapter, and the official delegate of the said chapter to the House of Delegates for the Western Mindanao Region
during the elections held last April 25, 2009. On the other hand, Atty. Benjamin Lanto was supposedly nominated by the
Board of Officers of the Lanao del Sur Chapter, except Atty. Macalawi, in Resolution No. 002-2009 dated February 28,
2009. However, it appears that, as discovered by the Committee, three (3) signatories of the resolution apparently resigned
as members of the Board of Officers since they are prosecutors who are ineligible for election or appointment to any
position in the Integrated Bar or any Chapter thereof, while (s)ix (6) other signatories of the resolution allegedly recalled
their signatures and they, instead, signed an authorization authorizing the Chapter President, Atty. Macalawi, to select and
vote for the Regional Governor for Western Mindanao. Thus, (t)he withdrawal of nine (9) signatures from the Resolution
No. 002, left only four (4) votes in support of Lantos nomination a puny minority of the 14-member Board of Officers of
the Lanao del Sur Chapter. [10]
 

The attempt of Atty. Vinluan and his group of Governors to nullify the election of Atty. Marohomsalic through
Resolution No. XVIII-2009 (Special A-30 April 2009) was clearly irregular and unjustified. Based on the April 25, 2009
election results, Atty. Marohomsalic won over his rival Atty. Lanto, 6 votes to 5 votes. Consequently, he was duly
proclaimed as the elected Governor of the Western Mindanao Region. On April 27, 2009, Atty. Lanto filed an election
protest, questioning the validity of Atty. Marohomsalics nomination by Atty. Macalawi, President of the IBP Lanao del
Sur Chapter, and claiming that his (Lantos) nomination by the Board of Officers of the Lanao del Sur Chapter was the
valid nomination.
 
Immediately, on April 30, 2009, the group of Atty. Vinluan issued Resolution No. XVIII-2009 proclaiming Atty.
Lanto as the duly elected Governor without affording Atty. Marohomsalic his right to due process. More importantly,
instead of calling for another election like what it did for the Greater Manila Region, the group of Atty. Vinluan
proceeded to instantly declare Atty. Lanto as having been duly elected on the ground that the nomination of the protestee,
Nasser Marohomsalic, was contrary to the will of the Lanao del Sur Chapter expressed through Board Resolution No.
00(2)-2009 of the Board of Officers (of the Lanao del Sur Chapter). [11]
 
As borne out by the records, Atty. Marohomsalic was duly nominated by Atty. Alex Macalawi, President of the
Lanao del Sur Chapter, and the official delegate of the said chapter to the House of Delegates for the Western Mindanao
Region during the elections. On the other hand, Atty. Lanto was supposedly nominated by the Board of Officers of the
same Chapter in a resolution dated February 28, 2009, which was not signed and approved by Atty.
Macalawi.However, and as already pointed out by the Committee, the withdrawal of nine (9) signatures from the
Resolution No. 002, left only four (4) votes in support of Lantos nomination a puny minority of the 14-member Board of
Officers of the Lanao del Sur Chapter.[12]
 
Thus, the Committee, citing Sec. 37, Art. VI of the By-Laws, clearly repudiated and overturned Resolution No.
XVIII-2009 (Special A- 30 April 2009) of Atty. Vinluan and his group of Governors. In its Report, it declared that the
nominee of the Chapter President, not the nominee of the Board of Officers, is the valid nominee for Governor of the
Region,[13] thereby sustaining the position of Atty. Marohomsalic and, in effect, the validity of his nomination by Atty.
Macalawi.
 
Despite the said findings, Atty. Marohomsalic was stripped of his electoral mandate and victory when the
Committee, invoking the strict application of the rotation rule, proceeded to altogether nullify the result of the elections
duly conducted on April 25, 2009. According to the Committee, neither Lanto nor Marohomsalic is qualified to be elected
governor because it was not the turn of Lanao del Sur chapter to represent the Western Mindanao Region in the Board of
Governors for the 2009-2011 term. As declared in the Report --
 
However, under the rotation rule, it is not the Lanao del Sur Chapter that should represent
the Western Mindanao Region in the Board of Governors for the 2009-2011 term. The
record of the IBP National Secretariat shows that, starting in 1993-1995 when the strict
implementation of the rotation rule began, the 12 chapter Western Mindanao Region has been
represented in the Board of Governors only six (6) Chapters, as follows:
 
1993-1995---Lanao del Sur-----Dimnatang T. Saro
1995-1997---Cotatabato---------George C. Jabido
1997-1999---ZAMBASULTAArthur D. Lim
1999-2001---ZAMBASULTA---Paulino R. Ersando
2001-2003---North Cotabato---- Little Sarah A. Agdeppa
2003-2005---Sultan Kudarat-----Carlos L. Valdez, Jr.
2005-2007---SOCSARGEN-----Rogelio C. Garcia
2007-2009---Sultan Kudarat-----Carlos L. Valdez, Jr.
 
Therefore, pursuant to the strict rotation rule, the Lanao del Sur Chapter must wait for the six (6)
other Chapters in the region (Zamboanga Sibugay, Zamboanga del Norte, Zamboanga del Sur,
Lanao del Norte, Misamis Occidental, and Maguindanao-Cotabato City) to have their turn in the
Board of Governors before Lanao del Sur may again represent the Western Mindanao Region
in the Board of Governors.
 
Since both Attys. Nasser Marohomsalic and Benjamin Lanto belong to the Lanao del Sur
Chapter, both of them are disqualified to be elected as Governor of the Western Mindanao
Region for the 2009-2011 term.
 
 
The ruling of the Committee insofar as it nullified the election of Atty. Marohomsalic as Governor of the Western
Mindanao Region cannot be sustained for not being in full accord with facts and the rules. While the Committee may have
correctly pointed out that under the rotation rule it was not yet the turn of IBP Lanao del Sur Chapter to represent the
region in the Board of Governors for the 2009-2011 term, it does not necessarily follow that the result of the elections
should be altogether nullified on that ground. Evidently, and as determined by the Committee itself, there are instances
when the rotation rule was not followed insofar as the elections in 1999 and 2007 were concerned with respect to the
Western Mindanao Region.
 
In the regular election of April 25, 2009, there is no dispute that the voting delegates of IBP Western Mindanao
Region voted into office Atty. Marohomsalic of Lanao del Sur Chapter as Governor for the 2009-2011 term. During the
said election, his only rival was Atty. Benjamin Lanto who also belongs to the same Lanao del Sur Chapter. A third
candidate, Atty. Escobar from the Sarangani Chapter, was nominated but he declined the nomination.
 
While the Committee points out that six (6) chapters in the region, including Sarangani, are entitled to precedence
over the Lanao del Sur chapter in the order of rotation, the fact remains that  not one of them nominated or fielded a
candidate from their respective ranks during the April 25, 2009 election.Neither did any one of them challenge the
nominations of the Lanao del Sur Chapter based on the order of rotation.
By not fielding a candidate for Governor and by declining the nomination raised in favor of its Chapter President
(Atty. Escobar), the IBP Sarangani Chapter is deemed to have waived its turn in the rotation order. The same can be said
of the remaining chapters. They too are deemed to have waived their turn in the rotation as they opted not to field or
nominate a candidate from among their respective members. Neither did they invoke the rotation rule to challenge the
nominations from the Lanao del Sur Chapter. On the contrary, they fully expressed their concurrence to the cited
nominations, which may be interpreted as a waiver of their right to take their turn to represent the region in the Board of
Governors for the 2009-2011 term.
 
It need not be stressed that, as cited by the Committee itself, there were instances when the Governor of the
Western Mindanao Region came from the same chapter such as ZAMBASULTA (1997-1999 & 1999-2001) and Sultan
Kudarat (2003-2005 & 2007-2009). Thus, Atty. Marohomsalic could not be faulted if the other chapters opted not to field
or nominate their own candidates. Having been validly nominated and duly proclaimed as the duly elected Governor of
Western Mindanao, Atty. Marohomsalic therefore deserves to assume his position during the remainder of the term.
It would have been a different story if another Chapter in the order of rotation fielded its own candidate or
invoked the rotation rule to challenge Atty. Marohomsalics nomination. But the record is bereft of any showing that his
nomination and subsequent election was challenged on that basis. If there was any challenge at all, it merely referred to
his nomination by Atty. Macalawi which the Committee itself has found to be in order. Thus, no compelling reason exists
to disregard the electoral mandate and nullify the will of the voting delegates as expressed through the ballot.
 
The rotation rule is not absolute but subject to waiver as when the chapters in the order of rotation opted not to
field or nominate their own candidates for Governor during the election regularly done for that purpose. If a validly
nominated candidate obtains the highest number of votes in the election conducted, his electoral mandate deserves to be
respected unless obtained through fraud as established by evidence. Such is not the case here.
Suffice it to say, the rotation rule should be applied in harmony with, and not in derogation of, the sovereign will
of the electorate as expressed through the ballot. Thus, Atty. Marohomsalic cannot be divested and deprived of his
electoral mandate and victory. The order of rotation is not a rigid and inflexible rule as to bar its relaxation in exceptional
and compelling circumstances.
 
If only to stress, compared to the case of Atty. Fortunato whose Romblon Chapter invoked the rotation rule, no
chapter in the Western Mindanao Region which was next in the rotation invoked the said rule.
 Now, in its Report, the Committee nullified the elections for the IBP EVP separately and simultaneously
conducted by President Bautista and EVP Vinluan on May 9, 2009 and called for a special election [14] for the same. In the
case of the election conducted by EVP Vinluan, the results were nullified for lack of authority to preside over the election
and for lack quorum, citing the disqualification of Attys. Soriano and Lanto to sit in the incoming Board of
Governors. The finding deserves to be sustained.
 
In the same Report, the Committee also nullified the result of the election for the incoming EVP conducted by
President Bautista. While recognizingPresident Bautistas authority to conduct the election, the Committee
nonetheless nullified the election results for lack of quorum, citing the ineligibility of Atty. Marohomsalic to sit in the
incoming Board of Governors, thereby leaving only four (out of nine) Governors-elect in attendance which did not
constitute a quorum.
 
With the election of Atty. Marohomsalic as Governor of Western Mindanao being deemed valid, then the defect
of lack of quorum that supposedly tainted the election proceedings for EVP separately conducted by IBP President
Bautista may have been cured, five (5) Governors being sufficient to constitute a quorum.
Be that as it may, the recommendation of the Committee to hold a special election for the EVP for the remaining
2009-2011 term deserves to be upheld to heal the divisions in the IBP and promote unity by enabling all the nine (9)
Governors-elect to elect the EVP in a unified meeting called for that purpose. This will enable matters to start on a clean
and correct slate, free from the politicking and the under handed tactics that have characterized the IBP elections for so
long.
 
In the conduct of the unified election of the incoming EVP, the following findings and recommendations of the
Committee shall be adopted:
 
THE ROTATION OF THE
PRESIDENCY AMONG THE REGIONS-
 
Sec. 47, Art. VII of the By-Laws, as amended by Bar Matter 491, Oct. 6, 1989, provides
that the Executive Vice President shall be chosen by the Board of Governors from among the
nine (9) regional governors. The Executive Vice President shall automatically become President
for the next succeeding term. The Presidency shall rotate among the nine Regions.
 
The list of national presidents furnished the Special Committee by the IBP National
Secretariat, shows that the governors of the following regions were President of the IBP during
the past nine (9) terms (1991-2009):
 
Numeriano Tanopo, Jr. (Pangasinan)Central Luzon1991-1993
Mervin G. Encanto (Quezon City) Greater Manila 1993-1995
Raul R. Anchangco (Makati)Southern Luzon1995-1997
Jose Aguila Grapilon (Biliran) Eastewrn Visayas 1997-1999
Arthur D. Lim ( Zambasulta)Western Mindanao1999-2001
Teofilo S. Pilando, Jr. (Kalinga Apayao)Northern Luzon2001-2003
Jose Anselmo L. Cadiz (Camarines Sur)Bicolandia2005-Aug. 2006
Jose Vicente B. Salazar (Albay)Bicolandia Aug. 2006-2007
Feliciano M. Bautista (Pangasinan)Central Luzon2007-2009
 
Only the Governors of the Western Visayas and Eastern Mindanao regions have not yet
had their turn as Executive Vice President cum next IBP President, while Central Luzon and
Bicolandia have had two (2) terms already.
  
Therefore, either the governor of the Western Visayas Region, or the governor of the
Eastern Mindanao Region should be elected as Executive Vice President for the 2009-2011
term.
 
 
Accordingly, a special election shall be held by the present nine-man IBP Board of Governors to elect the EVP
for the remainder of the term of 2009-2011, which shall be presided over and conducted by IBP Officer-in-Charge Justice
Santiago Kapunan (Ret.) within seven (7) days from notice.
 
Further, in its report, the Committee declared that the high-handed and divisive tactics of Atty. Rogelio A.
Vinluan and his group of Governors, Abelardo Estrada, Bonifacio Barandon Jr., Evergisto Escalon, and Raymund
Mercado, which disrupted the peaceful and orderly flow of business in the IBP, caused chaos in the National Office, bitter
disagreements, and ill-feelings, and almost disintegrated the Integrated Bar, constituted grave professional misconduct
which should be appropriately sanctioned to discourage its repetition in the future.  [15]
 
The Committee, however, fell short of determining and recommending the appropriate penalty for the grave
professional misconduct found to have been committed by Atty. Vinluan and his group of Governors. Still, with the above
firm and unequivocal findings and declarations of the Committee against Atty. Vinluan and his group that included Attys.
Estrada, Barandon, Jr., Escalon and Mercado as unprofessional members of the IBP Board of Governors (2007-2009
term) they certainly do not deserve to hold such esteemed positions.
 
It has long been held that, as provided for in Rule 1.01, Canon 1 of the Code of Professional Responsibility [16] that
(a) lawyer shall not engage in unlawful, dishonest, immoral or deceitful conduct. Added to this, Rule 7.03, Canon 7
requires that (a) lawyer shall not engage in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law, nor shall he
whether in public or private life, behave in a scandalous manner to the discredit of the legal profession. In the case at bar,
such canons find application.
 
In addition, it was clear to the Committee, and the Court agrees, that (t)he actuations of Atty. Vinluans Group in
defying the lawful authority of IBP President Bautista, due to Atty. Vinluans overweening desire to propel his fraternity
brother, Atty. Elpidio G. Soriano, to the next presidency of the IBP, smacked of politicking, which is strongly condemned
and strictly prohibited by the IBP By-Laws and the Bar Integration Rule. Indeed, said actuations of Atty. Vinluan and his
group of former IBP Governors Estrada, Barandon, Jr., Escalon and Mercado were grossly inimical to the interest of the
IBP and were violative of their solemn oath as lawyers. After all, what they did served only to benefit the apparently
selfish goals of defeated candidate Atty. Elpidio Soriano to be elected as IBP EVP and be the next IBP President for the
2011-2013 term by hook or by crook.
 
Bearing the above in mind, what Attys. Vinluan, Estrada, Barandon, Jr., Escalon and Mercado conspired to do
was truly high-handed and divisive that must not pass unsanctioned. Otherwise, future leaders of the IBP, Governors at
that, might be similarly inclined to do what they did, much to the prejudice of the IBP and its membership. Surely, this
should be addressed without much delay so as to nip-in-the-bud such gross misconduct and unprofessionalism. They all
deserve to suffer the same fate for betraying as well the trust bestowed on them for the high positions that they previously
held.
 
The Resolution of the Court in the case of Re: 1989 Elections of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines[17] already
declared that unethical practices of lawyers during IBP elections cannot but result in the stature of the IBP as an
association of the practitioners of a noble and honored profession being diminished. As held therein, (r)espect for law is
gravely eroded when lawyers themselves, who are supposed to be minions of the law, engage in unlawful practices and
cavalierly brush aside the very rules that the IBP formulated for their observance.  [18] Indeed, the said strong and vigorous
declaration of this Court on the 1989 IBP Election scandal is relevant here.
 

While Atty. Vinluan and his group deserve to be stripped of their positions in the IBP, this can no longer be done
as their terms as Governors already expired, specially on the part of Attys. Estrada, Barandon, Jr., Escalon and Mercado.
However, in the case of Atty. Vinluan, as former EVP of the IBP he would have automatically succeeded to the
presidency for the term 2009-2011 but now should not be allowed to. After all, and considering the findings of the
Committee, he has clearly manifested his unworthiness to hold the said post. On account thereof, Atty. Vinluan is thus
declared unfit to assume the position of IBP President. To the Court, if Atty. Vinluan cannot be fit to become a Governor
and EVP of the IBP then he is not entitled to succeed as its President for the 2009-2011 term.
Also, Atty. Vinluan and his group should no longer be allowed to run as national officers to prevent such similar
irregularity from happening again. Thus, in subsequent elections of the IBP, they are disqualified to run as candidates.
 
On the recommendation of the Committee to amend Sections 31 [19], 33, par. (g) [20], 39[21], 42[22], and 43[23], Article
VI and Section 47[24], Article VII of the IBP By-Laws, the Court finds the same in order. As such, and in order to
immediately effect reforms in the IBP, particularly in the holding of its elections for national officers, the subject
amendments are hereby adopted and approved.
 
WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Court resolves that:
 
1. The elections of Attys. Manuel M. Maramba, Erwin M. Fortunato and Nasser A. Marohomsalic as Governors for the
Greater Manila Region, Western Visayas Region and Western Mindanao Region, respectively, for the term 2009-2011 are
UPHELD;
 
2. A special election to elect the IBP Executive Vice President for the 2009-2011 term is hereby ORDERED to be held
under the supervision of this Court within seven (7) days from receipt of this Resolution with Attys. Maramba, Fortunato
and Marohomsalic being allowed to represent and vote as duly-elected Governors of their respective regions;
 
3. Attys. Rogelio Vinluan, Abelardo Estrada, Bonifacio Barandon, Jr., Evergisto Escalon and Raymund Mercado are all
found GUILTY of grave professional misconduct arising from their actuations in connection with the controversies in the
elections in the IBP last April 25, 2009 and May 9, 2009 and are hereby disqualified to run as national officers of the IBP
in any subsequent election. While their elections as Governors for the term 2007-2009 can no longer be annulled as this
has already expired, Atty. Vinluan is declared unfit to hold the position of IBP Executive Vice President for the 2007-
2009 term and therefore barred from succeeding as IBP President for the 2009-2011 term;
 
4. The proposed amendments to Sections 31, 33, par. (g), 39, 42, and 43, Article VI and Section 47, Article VII of the IBP
By-Laws as contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Special Committee dated July 9, 2009 are hereby
approved and adopted; and
 
5. The designation of retired SC Justice Santiago Kapunan as Officer-in-Charge of the IBP shall continue, unless earlier
revoked by the Court, but not to extend beyond June 30, 2011.
 
SO ORDERED.