Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ASSIGNMENT 1
CASE STUDY ANALYSIS (20%)
All your work must be done in English, typewritten in Arial (11 font), 1.5 spacing and
must be in numbering system. The use of diagrams and example photos, graphics or
infographics to explain the contents or process are highly recommended.
Upon completing, please use the Cover page given. Please merge all your work in a
singular PDF file, as follows :
For example, you are in class 4X, and one of your group members is Muhammad
Alham Sufian bin Muhammad Alfian Suparman, then please save your PDF file as
1
CASE STUDY
You are required to find your own case study regarding Traditional Procurement. Your
case study can be either of public sector projects, or private sector projects, done in
Malaysia after the year 2000.
Based on your case study, you are to analyse and explain in your report the differences
between the Traditional Procurement and Public-Private Partnership (PPP), practiced
in Malaysia after the year 2000. Your report must contain the following matters :
2
ASSESSMENT RUBRICS
1) Introduction = 5 marks
a. Exemplary – 5 : Insightful introduced and overview the topic, related to case
studies
b. Excellent – 4 : Insightful introduced and overview the topic
c. Good – 3 : Clear introduced and overview the topic
d. Average – 2 : Introduction is introduced and somewhat discussed.
e. Poor –1 : Introduction is introduced and somewhat is irrelevant.
f. Very poor – 0 : No introduction.
3) Conclusion = 5 marks
a. Exemplary – 5 : Conclusion is presented outstandingly clear, related to
case studies, and demonstrated the ability to related to the whole work to
course outcome
b. Excellent – 4: Conclusion is presented clearly, and demonstrated the ability
to relate to the introduction part of the work
c. Good – 3 : Conclusion is presented clearly
d. Average – 2: Conclusion is moderately presented.
e. Poor – 1: Conclusion is irrelevant.
f. Very poor – 0: No conclusion is presented
4) Organisation (5 marks)
a. Exemplary – 5: Observation results are presented outstandingly clear,
effective and logically. Very smooth flow of ideas and expression.
b. Excellent – 4 : Observation results are presented clearly and logically.
c. Good – 3 : Observation results presented clearly
d. Average – 2: Average organization. There is moderate attempt to present
the observation results clearly, effectively and logically.
e. Poor – 1: Poor organization on observation results.
f. Very poor – 0: No appropriate organisation were made
3
5) References = 5 marks
a. Exemplary – 5 : more than 10 references from various sources and
references is presented with APA citation format, and cross referred to the
whole Work.
b. Excellent – 4 : 6-10 references is presented with APA citation format, and
cross referred to the whole Work.
c. Good – 3 : 4-5 references is presented with APA citation format, and not
all are cross referred to the whole Work
d. Average - 2 : 1-3 references is presented with APA citation format, and not
all are cross referred to the whole Work
e. Poor – 1 : references is presented with poor format, and not all are cross
referred
f. Very poor: 0 – No references is presented.