You are on page 1of 204

A. R.

BORDON

OTHER PUBLICATIONS BY
A. R. BORDON

FICTION
¾¾Event!
¾¾Fireball
¾¾The Sangreal Coding
¾¾Remembrances of my father

NONFICTION
¾¾Ultimate thought
¾¾The Link
¾¾The coming longevitality of the Earth COBE
biomind
¾¾Biogeosystemics I: The Sonobioelectronic and
Sonobioelectrogravitic Nature of Life on Earth

2
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

BRIEFING BOOK

3
A. R. BORDON

IDIOMATERIAL UNUM-UNIVERSE SERIES

MARCH 2009
Biogeosystemics: I. The Sonobioelectronic and
Sonobioelectrogravitic Nature of Life on Earth And Why Pilot-wave
Subquantum Mechanics and Information Is Not Enough.
A. R. Bordon, D. H. Hasler, J. A. Sanchez, F. M. Maye, and R. B. Solingen

APRIL 2009
Biogeosystemics: II. Life on Earth by interspecies biocommunicative
interaction and COBEs’ interface as an aspect of the Over-
Function/Tautologic Refractivity phenomenon.
A. R. Bordon

2st edition, MAY 2004; Edited JULY 2009


Idiomaterial Universe 1: The UNUM as Monoidal Category of Objects
and Morphisms as Continuum Multileveled Manifold – A Work in
Progress of the Needed Mathematics and Problems Ahead
A. R. Bordon

JULY 2006
Idiomaterial Universe 1: The UNUM as a Natural System
A. R. Bordon and E. M. Wienz

AUGUST 2009
Idiomaterial Universe 2: The UNUM as Form-Design Continuum in
the Inner UNUM’s Condensate Region. – A Monograph
A. R. Bordon, J. A. Sanchez, F. M. Maye, E. M. Wienz, J. J. Jones, R. B.
Solingen and J. T. Traveler

SEPTEMBER 2009
How the Life Physics Group – California Came About
A. R. Bordon and E. M. Wienz

OCTOBER 2009
Thing Out of No-Thing: Light Encoding of Object Matrices and
Manifest Production Observership in the Idiomaterial UNUM – A
Technical Monograph
A. R. Bordon and D. H. Hasler

4
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

SOMETHING
FROM NO THING
Light Encoding of Object Matrices
In an Idiomaterial UNUM Universe

A. R. BORDON
Co-founder & Managing Scientist
Life Physics Group - California
arbordon@lifephysicsgroup.org

LULU.COM

5
A. R. BORDON

Copyright © by A. R. BORDON
Cover Copyright © 2010 by Carlos Riveros Palacios.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, or stored in


a database or retrieval system, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without
the prior written permission of the author and the publisher. Requests for such
permission should be submitted in writing and addressed to the author at
arbordon@lifephysicsgroup.org.

First U.S. Edition: October 2010


PUBLISHED BY:
Lulu Enterprises, Inc.
3131 RDU Center Drive Suite 210
Morrisville, NC 27560 United States of America
www.lulu.com
ISBN: 978-0-557-69182-1

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data


Bordon, A. R.
Something from No Thing / by A. R. Bordon
ISBN: 978-0-557-69182-1
1. Life physics. 2. Living matrix. 3. LEOM. 4. Human biomind.
I. Title: Something From No Thing.
II. Title.

Acknowledgements
The author wishes to thank fellow writers and colleagues for the unqualified
support and readings of early and later versions of this book, especially J. T.
Traveler, R. B. Solingen, J. O Hill, Lewis Sorient, F. M. Maye, Bill
O’Connor, J. J. Jones, J. A. Sanchez, E. M. Wienz, and all of the Research
Fellows at COIAST, in particular D.H. Hasler, with whom I coauthored a
technical monograph on which this book is based.

NOTICE CONCERNING THE CONTENTS OF THIS BOOK

This publication is designed to provide general information about discoveries


in thegeneral area of life physics generated and developed by the group of
which the author is a member. It includes information gathered by the author
and associates from the Life Physics Group – California, and from the
research of others about specific aspects of what is now emerging as a physics
of life and subquantum physics. At no time, and in no way, was classified
information sought and/or used in the writing of this book. All protection
protocols concerning the preservation of classified information in the interest
of the national security of the United States of America and of other countries
were respected in the course of the preparation and writing of this book.

6
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

CONTENTS
PREFACE

1
HOW WE DISCOVERED THE UNUM AND THE IDIOMATERIAL
NATURE OF THE UNIVERSE

2
LIFE AND MATTER IN AN IDIOMATERIAL UNUM

3
INFORMATION AND SONOBIOELECTRONIC ENERGY FROM A
SONOBIOELECTROGRAVITIC SOURCE

4
STRUCTURE & FUNCTION: THE PHYSICS AND BIOPHYSICS OF
THE SONOBIOELECTRONIC AND SONOBIOELECTROGRAVITIC
NATURE OF LIVING TISSUE AND MATTER ON EARTH

5
MPO–BIOGEOSYSTEMICS OF VACUUM-PLENUM INFORMATION
SUBQUANTUM BIOINFORMATION DYNAMICS

6
VACUUM-ENERGETIC ENCODING OF MATTER MATRICES: THE
PHYSICS & BIOPHYSICS OF THING OUT OF NO-THING ON
PURPOSE

7
VACUUM-ENERGETIC ENCODING OF MATTER MATRICES: THINGS
OUT OF NO-THING ON PURPOSE

8
DOING THE DEED: THE PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC LEOM
ALGORITHM

9
ABOUT LEARNING TO DO LEOM

10
NOTES

11
REFERENCES

12
ADDITIONAL REFERENCES

7
A. R. BORDON

PREFACE

MUCH OF THE EXPERIMENTAL WORK on which


this book is based was done by research fellows of the LPG-C.
D.H. Hasler, one of these research fellows, contributed important
conceptual frameworks to the work, and is recognized here for
his contributions.
If you got this book expecting to get a simple know-how on
how to make light encoding of object matrices possible in your
life, this book would, had you asked “what time is it?,” answer
the question not only what time it is (at the end, of course) but
also tell you how the clock works from which time is given, its
mechanisms and quirks. But you have not asked for the time; you
want to know how to perform light encoding of the matrix of the
object you’d like to create – something much more complex. To
do so, it is important that you understand what you are
attempting to do, what you are getting yourself into, and what are
your options in enhancing the probabilities you will be able to
light encode a thing you wish to see in your hand.
This book is written from two points of view. One addresses
the phenomena associated with object light encoding in a manner
suitable for an intelligent, informed, curious reader. The other
one is more technical, addressing the science and mathematics
which describe the idiomaterial universe/UNUM in which we
know now we exist. Some chapters, and some parts of other
chapters are going to switch back and forth between these two
viewpoints. It is necessary, and inevitable, to have to do so in
order to grasp and understand the ideas and science contained in
this book.
I hope the approach taken serves you well, whether you are
the curious, intelligent reader I expect you are to have purchased
this book to read, or a person trained in science, also curious
about the phenomena described here. Regardless, strap yourself
to your seat. An interesting ride is about to begin.

8
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

1
HOW WE DISCOVERED THE UNUM AND
THE IDIOMATERIAL NATURE OF
THE UNIVERSE

A SCIENTIFIC COOPERATIVE set up in the late 1980s


as a group of scientists and engineers then working in academia,
private and corporate research centers, and corporate
environments, the Life Physics Group - California was initially a
group that met weekly for lunches or dinners away from work.
At the beginning, concerns were the theoretical shortcomings of
relativity. This group grew over a couple years because it had
turned into a kind of oasis particularly for members from
academia and corporate settings. By 1989, there were a fair
number of people joining in on discussions and “thought
experiments.” In early 1990, the group formally became a
confidential coalition of loosely configured members from
academia and corporate science. The descriptor adopted was
“cooperative” because, early on it was recognized and accepted
that for everyone to continue coming to dinners and lunches and
pass all of the flutters (lie detector tests) and other interviews
concerning the security or secrecy of the work performed where
they worked, no program, issue, or project from work would be
mentioned in the skunk sessions of the budding group –
especially those which were covered by nondisclosure and other
security-related agreements. And membership identities would
have to be kept off the books and hidden by pen names – a
practice that continues today due to the inhospitable environment
that both academia and corporate science settings continue to
represent to members still bound by legal and subculture ties to
their place of work.
From the outset, it is also quite important to clearly state that
LPG-C is not associated with any U.S. government agency, does
not receive contracts from or in any way maintain formal or
informal relationships or working agreements with any part of

9
A. R. BORDON

govorgs. LPG-C is an NGO (nongovernmental organization) and


has been from its very inception.
By late 1990, early 1991, an informal agreement between the
dozen or so members was reached to turn the group into a
scientific cooperative, organized around specific research
activities. One of the members facilitated the finding of a
funding source from a family trust, which provided for monies to
pay for a group assistant-researcher-secretary-typist-person
Friday, and a computer. For approximately the next ten years or
so, the group concerned itself with theoretical and some applied
research of some anomalies and anomalous behavior, as defined
by the Standard Model. In 1991, some other events also
transpired that helped change the complexion of the group’s
purposes and objectives over the next decade and even today. By
then, the logical and theoretical flaws in General and Special
Relativity were obvious to the members of the group. David
Bohm was a rising star with most members, and his
interpretation of quantum mechanics – especially his notion of a
pilot wave – was getting closer attention.
This led to a closer look at the subquantum. By then,
Kozyrev’s theory was available to the group, and his causal
mechanics was a new groove on an old problem. One fine day, a
member of the group brought the work of a relatively obscure
French physiologist by the name of Antoine Priore, whose
research had been thoroughly and completely suppressed by the
French Academy of Sciences since the early 1960s. The Priore
effect became an object of intense theoretical scrutiny. An
emerging theoretical picture painted the subquantum, Kozyrev’s
time theory and Priore’s treatment effect onto the same canvass.
This, without a doubt, created some excitement in the group.
This excitement would increase exponentially when the small
engineering subgroup announced that they had come up with a
“paper” prototype of an apparatus that could conceivably
stabilize a remote viewer’s performance framework, far beyond
what the Russians were then doing.

10
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

1.1 From Remote Viewing (American- and Russian-style) to


Extension Neurosensing

We were aware that their study of biophysical fields around


remote viewers led Russian scientists into mapping out the
biophysical field phenomena that underlay RV. They found that
the biophysical field expanded in a flare out pattern when the
remote viewer was placed into a theta state. At the Schumann
resonance point of the Earth's natural frequency (7.8 Hz), the
human biophysical field seems to merge with its energetic
ambient environment and vanish for a split second. When it
came back into manifestation, it was many times larger than
normal. While in RV, the biophysical field seemed to grow
smaller, as if part of it was at the place being remotely viewed.
On more familiar grounds, they discovered that RV was just a
symptom or effect of Out of Body Experience (OOBE) caused
by biophysical translocation.
In simpler language, the biophysical body extended to the
distant location, interfaced or added information onto itself, then
returned to the physical body to transfer this information to the
brain. With Kirlian type scanners, the Russians found that RV
was a biophysical phenomenon. If the biophysical fields could be
controlled, not only RV was possible, but the telepathic
knockout, the ability to render the person you were remotely
viewing unconscious by psychic means would be possible.
Russian scientists also discovered that hypnosis could be
examined by its effect on the biophysical energy body, which
could be detected using Kirlian photoscanners and video
infrared-ultraviolet range scanners. They found that when a
paranormal warfare expert remotely viewed another person, there
was a change in the biophysical energy field of the remote
viewer and the person being psychically spied upon.1 Pulsed,
extremely low frequency (ELF) fields had been found to put
people into a trance. Russian scientists found that if the viewer
could mimic this ELF oscillation in his or her biophysical body,
then place this field over another person, the person would fall
unconscious.

11
A. R. BORDON

1.2 The telepathic knockout, the mind zapper and the Theta-
Delta Gun

Russians then began training remote viewer to mimic pulsed


ELF by using Kirlian photobiofeedback. In other words, the
trainee got picture feedback of the biophysical body while it was
exposed to this pulsed ELF; then, he or she would attempt to
reproduce this effect. After many months of Kirlian
photobiofeedback training of their own biophysical field,
Russian remote viewers would become enabled to control the
biophysical body used for RV.
There were other devices developed by Russian scientists
with psycho- and bioenergetic uses – one of these is the mind
zapper (Alexander Akimov, former director of the Soviet Center
for Nontraditional Technologies disclosed that Russian research
had discovered a new class of physical fields and particles. Other
Russian scientists also deciphered the effect these fields and
particles exerted on living and non-living organisms and
inanimate objects. Russian psychotronic generators, storage
fountains of torsionic radiation, were found to cause destruction
of the brain's neural network and the biophysical field around the
brain that constitutes our mind and psych.).
A standard RV operation for a Russian paranormal warfare
expert would consist of hooking themselves up to a psychotronic
device called a theta-delta gun, which, by reversing polarity in
the brain, placed the psi-officer in a deep hypnotic-like state
needed for psychotronic warfare. An ELF signal was broadcast
into the brain of the Biocontrol-officer that reproduced the
perfect brain state for RV viewing. A room-sized psychotronic
generator would then pump biophysical energy into the Russian
Biocontrol-officer, boosting that person's biophysical field so it
could overpower any normal person's biophysical field.
ooooo

We took all of this in, and into full consideration of the


phenomenon through a theory of biogeosystemics – the energetic
interaction between a human being, the physical environment,

12
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

the energetic ambient medium, the magnetic medium location,


and the local sonobioelectrogravitic connection to the sub-
quantum. The prototype model took into consideration all of the
demand characteristics learned from the Russian RV model
protocols and the biophysical, bioenergetic, and sonobioelectro-
gravitic requirements for a human being to extend successfully,
consistently, and on demand. The result was an extension
sarcophagus.

We called the combination of enabling human soft


technologies and bioelectronic technologies extension
neurosensing (ENS).

The rest of it, as they say, is history. Albeit, a quiet, conservative


history whose time is coming closer and closer to unveiling. ENS
is a human patrimony, because it can be used in nonweaponized
form and for benevolent, non-threatening and non-lethal
purposes. It has already turned on its head what we normally
would call physics. It even raises the issue of whether physics
should continue to be called physics, given that physicality and
even shared reality is a hologramic experience with broad
subquantum informatic bases. Moreover, what ENS has shown
us is that physical science is actually idiomaterial, and physics is
idiomaterial physics. What ENS has shown us is that there is a
Bohmian implicate order with rules and unique arrangement. The
story of how this knowledge came about can be found on the
FRLP page of www.lifephysicsgroup.org.

1.3 Extension Neurosensing

The technology that has made possible these maddening


advances as literal quantum leaps is one we call extension
neurosensing or simply ENS. It involves a seamless interaction
and interconnection between a human extensor (or ENS
operator), a technology array, enabling processes, and a
multileveled physics (classical, quantum, and subquantum). In
2004, the author wrote two significant contributions to the
understanding of the biophysics of extension neurosensing in the

13
A. R. BORDON

cooperative’s Foundation Reports in Life Physics (1, 15). In (1),


he offered eight tentative conclusions worth revisiting here.
These were based on work done by the small development team,
of which both authors were members, since 2000. The additional
knowledge we have gathered since starting to use ENS is
presented in italics. The original conclusions and the additional
gain (italicized) are:
1. What we have seen in stand-alone and technology-assisted
vector-intentional interface biocommunication initiated by
human ENS extensors is a biological equivalent of a combined
Meissner-antiMeissner effect produced through a range of
cellular capacitance and concomitant biophotonic output. This
range of cellular electrostatic charge levels would be somewhat
of a spectrum yet not well understood (2003-2004), but which
nonetheless evinces more than mere correlation between cellular
capacitance, biophotonic output, and harmonic resonant field
effects unique to complex living matrices. The spectrum would
range from (what at the time we considered to be) normal level
energetic regimes at one end, and over-threshold pumped-phase
energetic regimes at the other. We have since learned what these
levels are, and what must be done to achieve them safely and on
demand.
2. A Meissner effect in a biologically complex system, such
as a human integrated living matrix, appears to be a byproduct of
nonionizing radiant activity, in particular proticity, in the gel-
phase of solgel protoplasmatic transformations in human cells in
a pumped-phase state. At a normal rate of functioning, the gel
phase is normally accompanied by a more normal, chaotic,
plasma-like photonic field we have called Meissner field.
4. When the body’s cells enter a pumped-phase state of
sufficient coherence and stability, the field surrounding the body
(or Meissner field) undergoes a transition resulting in a
biological Meissner-antiMeissner effect. In other words, this is
more than just photonic coherent emission. A biological
Meissner-antiMeissner effect (or MAM) is achieved stably only
when there is sufficient coherence in the Meissner field reaching
maxima (or threshold), such that a resonant harmonic
antiMeissner maxima of equivalent field density appears (usually

14
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

a set) distance away from the index field and emanating physical
body. Achievement of stable Meissner-antiMeissner effect fields
is a matter of calibration of energetic induction leading to
threshold cellular capacitance across all space/time-time/space
regimes of body tissues, and the presence of an enabling
psychophysiology in the biomind of the extensor-neurosensor.
5. The body expels its polychromatic Meissner field as a by-
product to intra-cellular activity and electrostatic level of charge.
The resonant antiMeissner harmonic form expelled or, more
specifically, harmonic-resonated, is coherent, and retains a very
high fidelity to the “original” or “indexing” biophotonic field. As
near as we can tell, it retains its original energetic and informatic
composition and structure as a uniform field. AntiMeissner effect
induction, however, remains more of an art than a science today,
as there are Meissner field individual differences that must first
be calibrated and compensated to make a MAM (Meissner-
antiMeissner) effect sufficiently stable for the antiMeissner
harmonic resonant field to require minimal compensation to
informatically function as if the biomind is occupying it while in
resonance.
6. However, the anti-Meissner effect produces the result that
the body, which cellularly speaking, is in a semiconstant gel-
phase, traps the lower band of the emitted field, retaining around
itself a monochromatic biophotonic field in the 200 nm to 300
nm. This field does not demonstrate any dispersion and remains
an ultraweak low band light skin close to the body surface,
giving off an emission in the pale blue range. This emission (the
Meissner aspect of the Meissner-antiMeissner resonance effect)
is sufficiently stable and can be monitored by emanation strength
and density. This is also a bellwether emission, being a ligand
field expression to the antiMeissner harmonic, and therefore, we
regard this now as a “session system health” indicator of how
the neurosensor, system, and effect formation are functioning
with one degree of freedom.

15
A. R. BORDON

7. The harmonic resonant (antiMeissner) field, once


resonant, becomes a mobile and highly coherent vector, which
can also demonstrate an ability to serve as an extension of
cortical critical functions, including
reasoning, awareness, and
behavioral choice, as if the body
itself were present in the extension
context as actor and observer.
8. This leads us into the
technology path to avatar formation;
the technology for transforming
harmonic resonant fields into
bioelectronic avatar forms is in its
nascent stage. Our emerging
Working Model (and the aspect
models therein) allow for two
approaches to the creation of viable
bioelectronic avatar regimes. One is
the search for avatar-formation
thresholds in pumped-phase states,
such that the antiMeissner field is of such energetic level as to
allow the field to acquire hologramic form in 4-spacetime. The
other is the use of computers, with software capable of creating
thermodynamic-ally viable antiMeissner massifiable fields which
can couple a computer-assisted POV into super position upon the
massified avatar form. Form massification then becomes a matter
of quite manageable modulation of photons into a high-density
hologramic image, which can then manifest in 4-space/time (15,
120, 121).

1.4 Bioconnectivity in spacetime and beyond: Sensing mode


ENS

In this part, we are going to preview with you the bases of


why extension neurosensing works. There is a biophysics of it
and a bioelectronic basis for it. To begin, let’s have a closer look
at the biogeosystemics of the Meissner-antiMeissner (MAM)

16
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

phenomenon – an inductive approach at understanding what


makes it work. Volume 1, Number 1 issue of Foundation
Reports in Life Physics (FRLP), which we present below, will
expand upon our early findings (first and last essays) and the
science behind extension neurosensing (second and third essays).
See its Table of Contents.
The biogeosystemics of MAM involves EM fields – natural
and man-made - and the plenum engineering of coherent and
mobile dense forms of antiMeissner harmonic resonant fields in
4-spacetime. Meissner-antiMeissner fields are actual by-products
of a natural organismic phenomenon that occurs in cells, which
work as plenum engines in parallel and in series to produce
coherent Meissner fields that become a single degree of freedom,
very chaotic field at 90 degrees perpendicular to every square
inch of skin. Under certain circumstances, it will anchor a mobile
field that extends in 4-spacetime and into the templaic (or
quantum-potential) superdomain – as a quantum field at a
subquantum level. In (2) we have previously described Meissner
fields as coherent, naturally occurring energetic emissions of an
ultraweak, sonoluminal polychromatic nature. Naturally
occurring Meissner fields – coherent products of organismic
cellular bioenergetics – simultaneously manifest a bioenergetic
field with nonionizing radiant energies with a broadband
information spectrum, and a resonant-like ligand
interconnectivity with all orchestrated cellular quantum objective
reductions.
This ligand interconnectivity demonstrates characteristics of
nonlocal biocommunication between the issuing living system
and the mobile field by way of a resonant-like or tunneled-tuned
reciprocal connection; gnosive observation seems to indicate that
this tunnel tuning is associated with quantum computation
occurring on spacetime geometries in cytoskeletal microtubules
of the cortical brain, the enteric brain, and in tissue of the
neuromyofascial network. The bioelectronic properties of solgel
transformations at the cellular level of these tissues not only
produce just bioelectromagnetic radiation but also one which
exhibits specific characteristics: perfectly square biwaves (in the
EM and scalar or subPlanckian spectra), whose resonant

17
A. R. BORDON

harmonics do not seem bound by a spacetime manifold,


diminished by distance in 4-spacetime, or attenuated by
geometric boundaries between 4-spacetime and the templaic (or
quantum-potential) superdomain. Thus, it seems that each cell
produces a Stoney-Whittaker-Ziolkowski (SWZ) internal
structuring of its scalar potential as an internal biwave, cohering
with that produced by all cells, and expressing a scalar spectrum
energetics (energy + information) which serves as ligand
biocommunication means between Meissner and antiMeissner
regimes of the effect.
The emitting organism and the mobile antiMeissner resonant
field form a most effective and powerful biocommunication; in
essence, it is safe to say that the broadband requirement for two-
way communication between the antiMeissner resonant-like field
and the emitting living system is powered by a collective of
living plenum engines (i.e., the subquantum plenum cones of
cells of the whole organism) with sufficient but low emitting
power and near instantaneous detection-decoding-decipherment
capabilities to make sense of the information bandwidth’s
content tuned in on return.
We now know that the human organism’s bioelectronic ENS
mode of sensing, when in a mobile dense form POV, is a
holonomic perceptual field in which relative movement and
purposeful behavior reminiscent of action-in-the-world is
possible. With cellular plenum engines in rapid solgel
transformation, a sensing focus appears to cohere. This focus
avails the content of the information bandwidth to the enteric and
cortical brains by means of signal conversions that translate
intercepted signal received by quantum computation in
cytoskeletal microtubules of the enteric, CNS, and
neuromyofascial networks. This translation is conversion of
signal received into signal compatible to fundamental sensorial
algorithms which convert signal content into sensory
information. But which aspects of the enteroneuromyfascial
network performs this translation? We now know of two
confirmed possibilities.
The first is that there may be a perfect fit between tuned
signal and fundamental sensorial algorithms corresponding to

18
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

visual percepts and the decoding-decipherment capabilities of the


neuromyiofascial network to make sense of emotive information.
The second may be that there is a translation that take place
in neuromyofascial network tissue and glia in the ventral-
thoracic regions of the emitting body, and only then is the
translated signal made available to the CNS and cortical brains.
We know today that brain cells in the visual cortex respond not
to waveform interference patterns as they come in, but to their
Fourier transforms to see.
Thus, either incoming signals as interference patterns are
decoded across the entire enteroneuromyofascial network, or the
translation is more localized (e.g., ventral-thoracic enteric
decoding) and only then distributed throughout the network and
the cortex. Then there is the issue of translation: the changes that
occur from one templaic conformation to the other in spacetime
and the corollary issue of signal translation in the spacetime
regimes of a COBE’S body.
There is the problem presented by quantum potential effects
of the controlled transmutation of light and intermediate mass
isotopes in the cellular tissue of the human being emitting the
coherent Meissner-antiMeissner field capable of mobile, vector-
intentional focus. Current work in controlled transmutation of
mass isotopes in growing biological cultures (124, 125) shows
that creation of the rare Mossbauer isotope Fe57 in a growing
biological medium is possible.
The Gamow probability that tunneling quantum processes
themselves would produce nuclear transmutation at room
temperature is very small. However, there are processes capable
of providing short-term interference of the Coulomb barrier of
pair interaction in optimal micropotential hole in size Ro = 6-8 A,
with a structure that is nearly parabolic (125). But regardless of
how Fe57 is transmuted, its presence in solgel cytoskeletal actin
transformations (regulated by calcium) leads us to the
contributions it may make in signal translation.
We have also pointed out in (16) that a genesis-thought-
construct becomes a mirror-potential information cloud prior to
superposition to a 4-dimensional form-potentia (i.e., a fertilized
ovum or any asexually reproduced entity). We referred to the

19
A. R. BORDON

superpositioning as a handshake between templaic


conformations – the mirror potential information cloud on the
scalar or subPlanckian scale, and the life field (or
bioelectromagnetic field) produced to guide the reproducing life
form’s cellular and structural conformation. In 2004, we
presumed this handshake between templaic conformations to be
cause of polychromatic quantum resonant-like and coherent
Meissner fields and what we referred to then (as we still do now)
as the antiMeissner dense form hosting the mobile POV. What,
then, assists the seeming coherent (yet, perhaps, correlational)
bifurcation of a templaic conformation? More specifically, how
does coherent bifurcation of templaic conformations of complex
living systems occur? And how do such coherent bifurcations
result in coherent Meissner fields and coherent antiMeissner
harmonic resonants capable of hosting mobile dense form POVs
capable of operating in 4-spacetime and orthogonal spacetimes?

We hypothesized back in ’04 that this may be due to the


conformations themselves. And these hypotheses turned out to
hold water very well – figuratively speaking. The living tissue of
human beings as complex living systems constitutes long-
continua of superconducting, liquid crystalline cells in solgel
continuous states; this makes for a nonlinear medium, in which
photon and sound waves do not simply superpose (as in
coexisting as if another was not there); instead they modulate one
another, thus multiplying their amplitudes and generating
harmonic frequencies of up to nth orders from a fundamental. In
biological nonlinear living systems, both linear and nonlinear
effects seem to occur within the (photonic and sound) energetics
of the body. Linearly, waves pass through the medium and
through one another as if neither sensed the other’s presence,
although producing vector sums of the amplitudes and phases of
the waves involved at a given location of the body and at the
time it occurs. But in nonlinear effects, the medium is altered by
the passage of sound or light, whose index of refraction suddenly
changes when the energy going through exceeds the medium’s
threshold.

20
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

As Mae Wan Ho, back in 1996 (126), argued, living matrices


are energy continua, and they do process information on more
than a biogenetic level. Gariaev et al (109) (in work both in
Russia and Canada) and Nordenström (in work during the 1980s
and 1990s) (127) have confirmed Ho’s views that the living
tissue of complex living systems, like human beings, constitutes
long-continua of superconducting, liquid crystalline cells in
solgel continuous states; this makes for a nonlinear medium, in
which light and sound waves do not simply superpose (i.e.,
coexist as if another was not there); instead they modulate one
another, thus multiplying their amplitudes and generating
harmonic frequencies of up to nth orders from a fundamental.
In biological nonlinear living systems, both linear and
nonlinear effects seem to occur within the (light and sound)
energetics of the body. Linearly, waves pass through the medium
and through one another as if neither sensed the other’s presence,
although producing vector sums of the amplitudes and phases of
the waves involved at a given location of the body and at the
time it occurs. But in nonlinear effects, the medium is altered by
the passage of sound or light, whose index of refraction suddenly
changes when the energy going through exceeds the medium’s
threshold; the cell seems to – overall – act like a parabolic
reflector of every time-reversed photon emitted. So light emitted
by the assembly of tissue of a living human system is a Meissner
field composed of assemblies of photons that are both time-like
(spatially evident) and space-like (time reversed), evident in 4-
spacetime at the edges of the visible light spectrum. Thus, the
light diverging from a cellular source may experience distortions,
with its phase conjugate also experiencing the same distortion
but in the opposite direction, going backward in time.
However, the nonlinear nature of the medium in which this
occurs promotes emission-wide modulation of amplitudes, with
harmonic frequencies. This, in turn, appears to generate a fairly
dense nonlinear spectrum at 90 degrees from all body surfaces.
This is a spectrum of low powered bioelectromagnetic activity,
in which multifrequency photons (and their harmonics) coalesce
into a coherent Meissner field seemingly displaying a biological
Meissner-antiMeissner effect. So a biological Meissner-

21
A. R. BORDON

antiMeissner effect literally represents the presence of a


Meissner field as a fundamental, and antiMeissner fields as
harmonics in a series of fields manifest as spherical harmonics at
very low power, yet detectable if one is looking for them.
Polychromatic as a Meissner field appears to be, it turns out
that when the field’s potential is increased (either by means of a
reduction of body function requirements resulting in an
organismic optimal baseline, through relaxation or meditation, or
through technological means), only a narrow bandwidth of
emitted photons manifest as light is path-reversed (i.e., refracted)
back to the body. This occurs with photons occupying the 200
nm to 300 nm spectrum.
The remainder of the spectrum of multifrequency photons,
however, remains coherent when energized in electrostatic
potential, manifesting a broadband capacity for two-way
communication of bioinformation to the antiMeissner effect field
hosting the mobile POV; this is processed by neurosensors as a
holonomic experience. The dense form (or what we refer to here
as the antiMeissner harmonic resonance) appears to be
maintained by an energetic sustenance at a level beyond a certain
threshold; we now know that the mechanism through which
Meissner field energetic is increased involves cellular
transformation of specific kinds: the microtubules of all cells
become plenum engines by drawing on energetics from the
quantum potential and change to pumped-phase state, and also
the action of cellular centrioles turning on a communication
spectrum of photons from the low infrared to the high ultraviolet
(including all frequencies in the visible range) – but all photons
are time-reverse! This cellular transformations is what we have
found to be key to changing cellular capacitance to over-
threshold, in order to stimulate (i.e., increase) antiMeissner
cellular resonant harmonics. Interestingly, when such over-
threshold levels are achieved, and the capacitance if the first
spherical resonant field reaches a given level, it will then off-
shoot as a spherical energetic “ball.” And it is on this energetic
ball that a neurosensor’s POV may then be superposed as its
kinetic platform, thus also shaping the “ball” into the human life
form’s “corpoconsciousness” form. In other words, the “ball”

22
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

becomes pliant and transformable into whatever shape the


“driver” POV will wish to have. It may sound like scifi, but that
is how it works.

1.5 Extension Neurosensing: Thought experiments and


much more

In the matrix to the right on this page, we offer a 4 x 4 matrix


now commonly used in studies and experiments done by LPG-C
members. Form is a reference to the type of avatar formation
process used by the extension
neurosensor and the presence
or absence of technology
support and assist. Time-like
or space-like is a distinction in
reference to the type of
extension performed in search
for answers to specific
questions.
Research questions in ENS
are referred to heuristics. They
serve as the topical, semantic,
and meaning framework for
the information sought. Briefly, time-like refers to extension in
fractional ratios of space/time. Space-like, on the other hand,
refers to extension to a specific fractional ratios of time-space in
a given ratio of space. At this stage, we are going to greatly
simplify the notions of time/space and space/time for the sake of
understanding. Space in our referent frame is 3-dimensional –
height, length and width. Time is a local effect of the interaction
between subquantum vacuum-plenum in a local space/time
reference frame and all matter in that frame, including all life
forms. In the local time/space fractional ratio of matter-space and
time-subquantum vacuum energetics/ information, time is a
measure of movement and a reference for change in hologramic
experiences of L-RIS (living [mass] relatively independent
subtotality) observers-living masses-oscillating biological
masses. In a given space/time ratio, living forms exist. Each

23
A. R. BORDON

living form appears eminently suited to exist in its referent


frame. It knows and experiences the space/time ratio in which it
exists. A measure of the life form’s evolution and development is
its abilities to evolve into complex oscillating biological entities
(or COBEs) capable and able to become upward causal chain
agents, interconnective overfunctions of unit membership as
waveguides for the entire life form membership, and unit-mass
capacity and ability to perform a species or biokind function
called tautologic refractivity. These are going to be explored at
some length in (11).
Finally, all life forms are supported by a subquantum level
template, which interacts and feeds both energy and information
to an EM range template in the referent space/time of the
biological organism. All biological life forms in the universe
bear this field, and the more complex their life matrices are, the
more complex their Meissner field. All tissue of all life forms is
also quantum-interactive – with each other, with the environment
in which they exist, with the host spheroid’s life bent, and with
each of their mirror-templates. Objective reality, i.e., the reality
construed from sensory data of an ambient domain represented in
4-dimensions, in which other RISs exist, appears to be made
possible by a combination of orchestrated quantum objective
reductions performed by all tissue cells, proprioceptive data fed
to a central nervous system/cortico-enteric interactive quantum
extension data generated by specialized tissue, and the mirror
action between all quanta making up the life form and all quanta
making up the ambient domain, the life bearing spheroid and 4-
spacetime as level of manifestation. These phenomena appear to
keep the life form connected to all and everything in its ambient
domain, and share-distributable to all other forms of its kind and
all other forms on the spheroid.

24
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

2
LIFE AND MATTER
IN AN IDIOMATERIAL UNUM

LIFE AND MATTER is the stuff of an idiomaterial world in


the Unum. The term world we shall use here is a synonym to the
term space-time. However, mathematically speaking, the term
does not assume that we fix a particular Lorentzian metric tensor
field from the conformal class. For general definitions specifying
space-times and causality, see (1), (2)3 and (3).4 In this
BRIEFING BOOK, we examine what makes LERM and MPO
possible, and by what means can LERM be accomplished on
demand as LEOM. At first, we’ll be technical to establish some
parameters of thought for the technical folks. Bear it with, it
won’t last long. Muddle through it, but don’t avoid it.
We begin this part with a Newtonian world N, that is, a 4-
dimensional affine space equipped with a Newtonian causal
structure. The latter is defined as the family {J+x : x ∈ N} of
closed half-spaces with parallel boundary hyperplanes. An event
x belongs to its future set J+x. The symmetry group S is the 11-
dimensional Galilean group (including scaling). The group S
yields the Euclidean geometry of absolute 3-space.
Next, Minkowski world M0 is defined as 4-dimensional
affine space, but its causal structure {J+x : x ∈ M0}consists of
elliptic convex cones such that J+y is obtained from J+x by
parallel translation z  z + y - x. The symmetry group P is the
11-dimensional Poincare group (included scaling). It was
Hermann Minkowski who insisted on the absolute status of
space-time (instead of that of space). He also raised the question
of transforming the structures involved into less degenerate
ones.2 And then we mention briefly the main aspects of time as
energetic connection between the Unum and our index
space/time. In terms of the latter, its world M consists of the
Einstein space-time E as the underlying conformal manifold. The

25
A. R. BORDON

metric on E is dt2 - ds2, where t is time and ds2 is the Euclidean


on S3 induced by the standard immersion of S3 into R4 . A future
time direction in E is fixed, and a future cone appears in every
tangent space of M. In M one can define future sets in a fashion
similar to the previous cases. This structure gives rise to the
symmetry group M which is now the universal covering of SU(2;
2). It acts globally on M.
The Minkowski world is conformally imbedded into M via
the Cayley transform. The radius R of the space S3 does not
depend on the chosen metric from this conformal class, i.e., the
metric in which it is calculated. In other words, R is a conformal
invariant. It is convenient to use natural units in which R, the
speed of light c, and the Planck constant h are equal to 1.We
denote by Κ the 7-dimensional Einstein isometry group. The
energyH is the generator of time in E. Relative to any point of
observation in M, the Minkowski world M0 is imbedded P-
covariantly, and the relativistic or Minkowski energy calH0 is the
generator of time in M0 relative to the Lorentz frame in M0,
which, at the point of observation, osculates the frame defined by
the space-time splitting in E. This Minkowski energy calH0 is
also the source of energy for both LEOM and MPO, as we will
discuss later in this Briefing Book.
In an index space/time ratio, say, Palo Alto, California (as
anywhere else on Earth), the quantum vacuum (QV) consists of
virtual particles that are created alone (photons) or in massive
particle-antiparticle pairs, both of which are jumping in and out
of existence within the constraints of the Heisenberg uncertainty
principle (∆E∆t ~ ħ); i.e., they appear in free space for short
periods of time (∆t) depending upon their temporal energy
content (∆E) and then disappear. This is what we have elsewhere
(1) labeled the Texas 2-step, because the QV is an everchanging
collection of virtual particles which disappear after their short
lifetimes ∆t to be replaced by new virtual particles that suffer the
same fate, the process continuing ad infinitum. A set of fields is
the fundamental building block out of which the visible universe
is constructed.
For example, the vector potential for the quantized
electromagnetic field can be expressed as

26
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

(1)

where the first sum is over the two polarizations of the field, k =
|k|, V = L3 is the box-normalization volume, ak,s(t) is the photon
annihilation operator, h.c. stands for the Hermitian conjugate of
the first term within the brackets, and ek,s is the unit polarization
vector. This is the quantized vector potential for the EV
component of the QV. The vector potential satisfies certain
periodicity conditions, where the ni can assume any positive or
negative integer or zero. Since the Planck constant ħ is
considered to be a primary constant, the field is a fundamental
one not derivable from some other source, like a collection of
charged particles. We also now know that ħ is not a primary
constant and that there is a far more fundamental reality behind
the quantum fields.
The singular, most important characteristic of the
electromagnetic vacuum (EV) as well as the massive particle
vacuum (MPV), is the so-called zero-point energy that is infinite
because of the unbounded nature of k (|ki| < ∞)in (2) below,

k = (kx, ky, kz) = (2π / L)(nx, ny, nz). (2)

From Equation (1) above, it is also possible to derive the


energetic density of the electromagnetic vacuum (EV), where the
infinite upper limit on the integral is due to the unbounded k in
Equation (2) above.
A charged vacuum (or Planck vacuum, PV) has been
identified as the fount and source of the quantum vacuum, and
the electromagnetic vacuum energy can be derived through

where the infinite upper limit on the integral is because of the


unbounded k in Equation (2). It is also possible to calculate a

27
A. R. BORDON

wavenumber, which cutoff is based on our own and that of


several other independent groups.

2.1. The Unum as a Natural System

Now, I need to present a new paradigm to you, such that


what we found can make sense to you. There will be new terms
and new ways of looking at old things.
In the late 1990s, right after the first extension neurosensor
sarcophagus was prototyped and tested, those of us involved in
neurosensing immediately realized that the medium onto which
we had stumbled upon was not just the universe as science on
Earth thinks of it. We also realized that this Unum (as we
baptized it in name, because of its unique unitary characteristics)
was a natural system in itself, and we were contained in it – we,
meaning, the known universe, what is now referred to as
quantum and subquantum ether, vacuum and plenum, and
aspects of a form-design continuum as unique principal
characteristic of this fascinating Unum. One additional thing
became eminently evident almost immediately. This Unum, we
realized, was, in Earth terms, alive. And yet it was also matter
and essence of thought as we know it. Confounded and
completely mystified by the discovery, we invented a technical
term to denote the state and chief characteristic of this
phenomenon beyond words. We chose the word idiomaterial to
signify these two main qualitative and quantitative attributes.
Pantheistic creationism? No. This was definitely not a doctrine; it
was and is a reality that encompassed us, who for the first time,
were having the unusual and unexpected look at something we
had to invent words to describe and to understand. It demanded
fidelity to what we became at tangent with it (meaning, what we
came to grasp whole). This meant understanding thing on its
terms, not on ours, nor in terms of our mathematics at present.
At first, in 1999 and 2000, we contemplated the discoveries
and developed languaging systems that captured what we
detected, decoded and deciphered as best we could. By 2001 and
2002, we were confronted with the necessity to illustrate

28
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

processes observed gnosively, without using the term object to


describe something much more fluid and fluid-like than any one
thing or object in the human perspective of the world. And all
these fluid-like events that are manifestations in a form-design
continuum must be driven by something.
We were not the only ones who recognized this need. But we
were the only ones in possession of a technological means to
explore Nature on its terms, not limited to interventions upon her
as human instrumentable physics does and theoretical physics
aspires when it frees itself of the limitations of mathematics
when used by contemporaneous human scientific bicameral
consciousness exercising its trade paradigm. Human science
today compounds its suffering of a kind of scientific solipsism by
going to extremes and pretending to do the impossible: by
attempts at elimination of the inconvenient, science (especially
physics) declares that there is no need for an observer in science
at one extreme (tell that to the experimentalists!) and that when
given to admit there is one, the observer must bring objectivity to
the task – both of which are impossible ones. Yet, the observer is
not a mathematical object to be considered in the equations of
physics.
Causality is another issue on which we part company with
standard physics. What, then, drives all those fluid-like events
that are manifestations in a form-design continuum? Another
who recognized the need for “something” that acted as a “driver”
was Phillip Pearle (4), who wrote, “I have made some bets as to
the nature of an eventually satisfactory physical theory. One of
them is that there is such an object, a statevector in a suitable
Hilbert space plus something more. I shall argue that more must
be added because standard quantum theory (SQT) is a theory of
choices without a chooser: more is a chooser” (p. 1). Well said.
But where does it lead us? In a previous essay (5), the author
collaborated with E. M. Wienz, an LPG-C member and
cofounder in an examination of the Unum as a natural system.
On it, we wrote,
To use the term creation begs the question of who or what did
the creating. It also raises the “creationism” specter from the
terms religion and spirituality – terms which are conversation-

29
A. R. BORDON

and discussion-enders in any meeting of professional


physicists. They are looked at as non-sequiturs that raise bad
inferences that do not follow from the premise. Likewise,
raising the issue of causality (upward and downward) is also
one of those terms that will suddenly bring the room into
embarrassing silence, as if someone had passed wind in the
middle of some discussion on an otherwise important subject
(pp-1-2).

Some points of view say that the statevector does not


represent the world but is only a mathematical tool enabling
people to calculate the statistical outcomes of experiments (2),
and that only an ensemble of experiments is represented by the
statevector (3) (4). Could it be possible that quantum theory does
not have any relevance to an individual world, or to an
unobserved world? Some say that a density matrix is the only
proper and logical object to represent the world, and that only
ensembles of worlds can thus be represented. In classical physics
the object is a point in phase space. So far it has been possible to
represent the world at an instant (as on a spacelike hypersurface).
Other possible representations are possible: it might only be
possible on the spacetime volume between two hypersurfaces, or
there might be another time parameter whose specification is
also required. But, let’s go along with Pearle for a moment and
agree that it should contain at least what can be observed to exist
and what can be thereby inferred to exist. This means at the least
all the particles and structures the existence of which physicists
agree upon in general at present; however, it does not include the
more mentioned above, which is thought of as an additional
structure by physicists, and this structure is possible to also be
included in the statevector.
But before launching into ultimate cause, let’s deal with its
existence as the reality of the Unum as well as its conceptual
reality in human experience.

2.2. The Unum: Form-Design Continuum

Science in an idiomaterial physics is to do science in an FDC


(or Form-design Continuum) that extend beyond the universe

30
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

itself. Physics and cosmology end their consideration of natural


phenomena at the fractal boundaries of a seemingly inflationary
universe. Idiomaterial life physics does not; it extends to what
gnosive evidence indicates is an immense source in the form of a
fuzzy boundary which, for the sake of representation, is
conceived of as a broad region of an ovoid, onion-like structure
that behaves like an object but is not, because it is intelligent
energetics throughout and material all over. Yet it is material
only to an observership that is designed and constructed to
interface with media inside the boundary by means of perceptual
apparata (biophysical or instrumented) based upon the very
means by which perception occurs – condensed energy as
matter-fields. In reality, what became FDC and we now
recognize it as UNUM is infinite but with a fuzzy boundary that
covers the structure and is what we have come to use the T-
boundary or Thought-boundary as a boundary term. This
boundary term offers specific characteristics we can now
describe with more precise information (see 21).
Superdomain structures are contained within the T-boundary.
As arrangements, they are layer-like configurations of thought-
substance – plasmoid photonic medium with extremely dense
information bandwidth. Each of the layer-like thought-substance
made up of plasmoid matter configured as high density
information media also act as condensed energy matter-fields
that are also extremely dense information media. This is what is
defined as a Form-design Continuum in the shape of a pattern-
plan model, wherein lies from outer- to inner-positioning a
concentric series of plasmoid-to-condensed media.
The integration of the structure is complete (all objects and
sets exist within it, (all objects and sets exist within it, nothing is
needed it cannot create itself), whole (the objects are
amalgamations of mergers, mixtures, resonances and harmonics),
and share-distributable (all objects in all sets and all products of
all merger and mixtures and all bijections of all harmonics and
all resonances [mathematically speaking] are continuous and
wholly interconnected); it is a continuum, from T-boundary to
any surface of local space/time in the known universe.

31
A. R. BORDON

Figure 1 – A 2-dimensional representation of 10-dimensional Unum


as Form-design Continuum

Although its integration is complete, whole and share-


distributable, its functional design is based on a regional design
demarcated by a unisonic harmonic zone, in which media
appeared to be mergers and mixtures of electromagnetic, sound,
and gravity-like energy. We have made a valiant attempt at
capturing on a 2-dimensional surface the essential Unum as how
it looks to a neurosensor from close to the T-boundary. In other
essays, we have described it as a fairly ordered, neatly organized
structure, with all superdomains clearly demarcated in the
sequence and with the names with which we baptized each of
them. However, the way it looked to those of us who have
participated in detection, decoding, and deciphering of cumuli
(magna sets of information) about it is much closer to the artistic
renditions used as Figures 1, 2a and 2b. From early on, we seven
neurosensors agreed we were sensing a magnum structure of
energetic media. It was obvious from the beginning that two
regions were fairly well established, delineated and defined. The
structure was egg-shaped on occasion, and onion-like at others.
Regardless, the structure often appeared semi-transparent and
riddled with large eddies, most of them bigger than the universe
as we know it. The two regions were also evident (see Fig. 1),
distinguishing one from the other by a narrow frame of fuzzy

32
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

boundary, beyond which toward the inward direction, the color


and appearance changed from a semi-transparent blue-green with
occasional patches of ochre to a reddish-orange and brown,
which encompassed what we called the logomorphic rings
(actually, they form a toroidal field that envelops our universe),
the quantum-vacuum (also now referred to as subquantum) and
the universe as we know it, or space/time.
Whether in thought-substance or in condensate region,
space/time and time/space regions are always 2-dimensional, but
the media in which these ratios exist can be in 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 8-,
10-or 11-dimensional configurations. The higher the dimensional
configuration of the medium, the higher the symmetry, the
ordered entropy (with no positive entropy manifest in both
regions, as well as in the unisonic belt), and energetics. Space in
s/t ratios is always 2-dimensional, with no time or t = 0 because
in nonparticulate media, the medium itself is 2-dimensional
surfaces stacked from the infinite future to the infinite past in an
infinite dimensional construction or structure. But how the
medium functions in both regions is where the symmetric and
entropic arrangement calls for dimensional configurations higher
than the 2-dimensions of the surfaces.

1.3. The Unum: Ultimate Cause

Robert A. Herrmann, retired professor of mathematics at the


U.S. Naval Academy, writes, “A direct logical proof for the
existence of an ultimate cause has as its last line a statement such
as Therefore, an ultimate cause exists. But, what type of logic is
used to deduce this last line?” ([5] p. 1). To answer this question,
we have used propositional, modal, predicate and ultralogic. In
text form, we have been presenting axioms in this and other
essays and monographs (7), (8), (9), (10), (11), (12), (13), (14),
(15), and (16). A reread of the text in 1.1 and 1.2 will yield
axiomatic statements that are found codified in essays (8), (10),
(11) written to examine the specific mathematical logics needed
to choose mathematics useful to the purposes of developing and
establishing a direct logical proof for the existence of the T-
boundary as the ultimate cause.

33
A. R. BORDON

We are not attempting to establish the T-boundary as God


and thereby a proof for the existence of God. Instead, we are
attempting to establish the T-boundary as idiomaterial ultimate
cause. We regard a creator-ultimate cause as also having

Fig. 2a – The Inner Unum as particulate Form-Design Continuum

established the idiomaterial causal chains, such that the Unum is


creation and creator, but not the ultimate creator of all. In other
words, creation begins at the T-boundary and the creator lies
beyond it.
In cosmogony and cosmology, processes of the universe are
conceptualized as a series of states caused by the preceding one;
this, then, prescribes the mode and manner in which a dynamical
law is establish on the causal relationship in question. The 2008
Templeton Prize winner, Michael Heller, wrote, “there is always
a dynamical law prescribing how one state should generate
another state. But dynamical laws are expressed in the form of
mathematic-al equations, and if we ask about a cause of the
universe we should ask about a cause of the mathematical laws”
[(17) p. 834].
In the case of the T-boundary, we begin with its signature.
Herrmann says it is possible to use the painting techniques used

34
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

by a master as his or her signature, and that the idea of the this
kind of authorship of a work of art as the literal cause is the same
as the work of art being signed by the master. This, he contends,
is applicable with full force of logic to the idea of a higher-

Fig. 2b – The Particulate Universe surrounded by the Vacuum


Subquantum

intelligence signature as universe generating ultimate cause, and


that the General Grand Unification (GGU) model’s General
Intelligent Design’s interpretation has demonstrated it is rational
to accept the existence of such a universe generating ultimate
cause (6).
The resulting model is analogue at the start. We are
continuing to labor ahead on a Working Model that so far is a
quilt of analogue and mathematical models which use classical
and ultralogics to predict the existence of an ultimate cause that
behaves in a specifically describable manner. Moreover, indirect
physical evidence establishes the existence of such an ultimate
cause, denoted by *Tb . It, too, is a very specific ultimate cause.
Furthermore, the author has, in 2004, establish that that certain
Earth human biological entities within the *Tb constructed
universe, have attributes that, in restriction, rationally correspond
to *Tb attributes. However, these *Tb attributes are stronger than

35
A. R. BORDON

any comparable attributes displayed by any other biological


entity within the *Tb universe (or known universe). Indirect
evidence for the existence of such *Tb attributes comes from the
fact that certain human complex oscillating biological entities
from Earth display such attributes in a restricted form. The
acceptance by a science-community outside the idiomaterial
physics group at LPG-C of such indirect evidence for attributes
depends on the community’s scientific method. In the modeling
quilt, classical logic, ultralogic, and * (or hyper-) mathematical
reasoning are used. We are aware that not all mathematical
reasoning may be expressed and classified in standard language
of a natural language on Earth. Thus, we have developed two
additional languaging systems that serve as additional methods
of addressing and handling the expression and classification of
mathematical objects and strategies used in mathematical
reasoning, and in the distinction of the meaning of meaning, as
well as meaning itself.5 One is topological thinking or topothink
(18) and the other is Neurolinguistic Registry.6
In another monograph, the author and colleagues make the
case for the integrated system structure of the Unum (12).
In it, we explored ways of “doing science in the Unum as one
symmetric monoidal physical object as category. To do so, we
need to see if the Unum is amenable to being portrayed as a
model and described as a theory” (p. 31). They proceed to show
it is possible to do so, but the strangeness of the Unum does not
stop. “The Unum behaved as a onion-like ovoid globular form
having its initiation at a boundary range we called the T-
boundary. Its metaorganization indicated that it arranges itself by
means of resonance and by harmonics of the initiator or 0 object
in the category C*. There are seven harmonics in total, the
second of which (or what we dubbed the Prime-causal
superdomain) displayed a function of being a superlibrary, in
which objects were “stored” in digital, trigital, quintigital and
hexagital formats. We yet don’t understand the reason for this
multiple formatting. But we do know that formatting and the
storage medium were “translatable” into each other and a
“handshake” procedure was common to both – much like a new
software added to an operating system relies on a “handshake”

36
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

signature to connect and integrate itself into the whole. Even


stranger was that entries into this superlibrary behaved with us as
though everything was digital. So, to understand the workings of
it all, we could treat each “entry” as a finite, binary product with
initiant and terminal objects – which all did! This then behaved
as a full-fledged Cartesian category, which also allowed for the
duplication and deletion of information in any product – in other
words, a modification with a new morphism to boot!
And then there were braided objects that were systems
wrapped around each other that, topologically speaking, switch
each other around in a tangle that describes the process of
switching two points. If we referred to this category Cb (and an
object in a Cartesian set C) as a braided monoidal category, then
a natural isophormism known as the braiding assigns to every
pair, quad or hex of objects an isomorphism bx,y:X ⊗ Y → Y ⊗ X,
such that hexagon equations are possible. Phenomena in the
Prime-causal behaved very much like symmetric monoidal
categories, were real and very weird. Baez and Stay [20] say that
a symmetric monoidal category is a braided category where the
braiding satisfies bX;Y = b Y,X –1 Any Cartesian category
automatically becomes a symmetric monoidal category, so Set is
quite symmetric” (p. 33).
Finally, there is much to be said for what is experimental
work in idiomaterial physics, and what is quasiexperimental
work in subquantal information physics. The subquantum, which
is the UNUM closest to spacetime, is accessible directly by
interventions which we report in (22), (23), (24), (25), and (26)
in health applications using a modified Priore method, and a field
exploration of the induction of a controllable micro-singularity in
an electrically charge natural environment with the purpose of
inciting a macrobleed of vacuum-plenum virtual electromagnetic
activity as wraithlike network of visible bioluminescent
filaments.
These we found detectable and measurable in real time by
instrumented means.
They were also coordinate with a spacelike gnosive access
study by gnosive neurosensors nearly 1,000 miles away. We
have also looked at the effect of sounds on the generation and

37
A. R. BORDON

sustenance of measures of positive health in field environments


(homes of participant) in which specific sound protocols were
made available as low power, low decibel level sound walls
spanning specific frequencies over 2+ years. This is part of an
ongoing, long term study of small n groups focusing on specific
aspects of biological longevitality (see [27] for a book-length
exploration of longevitality). And we have put the ACIO’s
reported use of so-called LERM (light-encoding of reality
matrix) objects as a specific subset of what our Working Model
predicts as manifest production observership (MPO) effects by
way of person-reality interaction.
In the first, we discovered that something out of no-thing is
not only possible but, under the right circumstances, inevitable.

We also attempted to take Rabbi Jesus Cunobeline and his


fishes and loaves to task, and did one better, as he predicted it
would be possible about now, quite successfully not once but
several times. One better, meaning that both inert and biological
objects are amenable to LEOM (light-encoding object matrix)
matter synchronization.
In this Briefing Book, I intend to share with you the scientific
bases of LEOM and the algorithmic nature of the act itself.

38
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

3
INFORMATION AND
SONOBIOELECTRONIC ENERGY
FROM A SONOBIOELECTROGRAVITIC SOURCE

ONE OF THE MOST SURPRISING findings for us


neurosensors was the witnessing of the multiple phases of matter
templaically organized as objects. Matter, it would seem, does
not exist in a single phase, as in the so-called “local” frame of
reference. Instead, it exists in multiple layers or phases, each
forming an aspect of the entire object perceivable to a human
observer through interoceptive modalities of the human
perceptual apparatus. Thus, matter (as well as material processes
of all kinds) can become synchronized (created) or
desynchronized (dismantled and/or destroyed). In this
phenomenal framework, both the experience and the action are
interpretation of results of processes that are already patterned by
Nature. It is us who are just discovering them. In this case, we
have a guide and pointer to the phenomenon and the experience;
we are referring to a man, long ago, who fed a multitude with
few fish and loaves of kosher bread, and quenched their thirst
with wine from water. Everyone knows His name.
He also let it be known that at about this time in our
evolution, we would be starting to do him one better.
Interestingly enough, it seems he knew something we are only
discovering now: it is inscribed in all of us this ability to light-
encode – as we shall see in this monograph. The human ability
concerning this phenomenon is not theoretical; it is quite
practical. Both authors can and have synchronized matter on
demand.
In our index frame of reference (actually, anywhere on the
surface of Planet Earth), matter synchro-desynchronization
continually occurs, some instanced by observership of biological
entities (complex and not) that live on Earth, while some
occurring by other processes. What is new to us now is that

39
A. R. BORDON

matter synchronization, much like so-called cold fusion, is


possible at room temperature and by biological means. If this is
known in official circles (and we have powerful reasons to
believe it is known), it would then be one of the most secret
knowledge sets held by any government. Imagine the worldwide
economy if 3 percent or more members of the human race learn
to synchronize foodstuff and other objects out of thin air! But,
simply because one learns to synchronize matter does not mean
one is free of wants, and can have anything one desires. It
doesn’t work that way. It will take several generations for us to
get to that point, as the pattern is yet quite unstable in the human
genome, and more people need to learn to manifest it to get the
human race to the level necessary to prompt an entrainment
process that affects the rest of humankind. The main purpose of
this monograph is to assist in this process of genomic change.

3.1. The Unum as Matter Synchronization Medium

Material synchronization and desynchronization occurs in


time but manifests as space perturbation in the form of matter.
We now know and understand it comes through and from
subquantum energy as time energetics, and how. There is
desynchronization and synchronization of matter by
technological means, and also by biological causal induction. We
focus on the latter; it is what in the popular mind today is known
as LERM, or more technically, LEOM (light-encoding of object
matrices) and VEEOM. More on this later. In this monograph,
we will also refer to it as matter synchronization.
The rest of this monograph is devoted to our presentation of
the physics and biophysics of matter synchronization in the
Unum, and more specifically in the Form-Design Continuum of
the particulate/condensate region of the Unum – in which the
universe as we know it is located – by a human being. In other
words, we are proposing that a human COBE (complex
oscillating biological entity) is capable of performing a feat of
matter synchronization at room temperature and by biologic
causal induction.

40
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

Let’s begin with destruction to know and understand how


creation works.

3.1.1. Matter Desynchronization/synchronization

a. Desynchronization
Temporal matter desynchronization is a phenomenon that
often goes unnoticed because it occurs when light in a material
medium travels through it in a curved pathway, when the speed
of light varies from the speed value in the vacuum. This effect
ordinarily goes unnoticed. Large increases in the refractive index
by electrical means produce large desynchronizations in inert
matter. The rate of time passage inside the inert matter medium
is retarded with respect to the rate of time passage outside the
medium. In biological tissue, matter desynchronization is at the
heart of the Priore effect. See other essays and monographs done
by LPG-C members, part of the Idiomaterial Unum-Universe
Series.
Inert matter desynchronized relative to the index medium
could pass through matter in phase with the local reference
frame, since the local reference matter is not crossed by the
desynchronized matter at the same rate of time passage. A key
factor in desynchronization is the presence of iron in
desynchronizing matter. In experiments done by others known to
us, iron plates were the metal of choice due to their magnetic
properties. Larry Adams’ ideas on matter desynchronization
were tested, quite successfully. In an earlier experiment, a hollow
sample of large dimensions was used as suggested. The shell,
separating inside from outside, was relatively thick. The index of
refraction in metals can indeed be expressed as a function of the
plasma frequency, Wp, and the applied frequency, W,

n^2 = 1 - (Wp / W )^2 (4)


In the experimental framework, N was a key measure, where
the number of electrons was the electron density in the metal at
crucial moments. N is directly proportional to the mass density.
For constant mass, a decrease in density requires an increase in

41
A. R. BORDON

volume. A large increase in volume would significantly lower


the plasma frequency, greatly increasing the transparency of the
metal. The physical properties of a metal crystal are a function of
the crystal structure itself. When an acoustic wave heats the
crystal by compressing it, at certain temperatures, the crystalline
structure of certain substances, including metals like iron, may
change in lattice arrangement, and a sudden change of volume
will occurs at constant temperature, making the coefficient of
expansion momentarily infinity. If the volume were infinite, the
iron would become transparent to all electromagnetic
frequencies.
In an attempt in the summer of 2009 in Montana at
replicating earlier work with iron, we saw iron become
transparent to all EM frequencies, as predicted by Adams. For
the iron to be transparent to frequencies from radar to optical
ones the volume would be finite. Since the volume change is at
the level of the crystal lattice, no macrophysical change in
volume is expected, and none was measured. The main
acoustooptic effect is the change of the optical index of
refraction of the material under the influence of strain caused by
the acoustic wave. As the pressure on a material changes, so does
its density and therefore its index of refraction.
As previous work found, nonlinear equations of motion for
the interacting spins are important for the large amplitude
precessions induced by the intense microwave fields. We also
saw these large amplitude precessions break up into acoustic
vibrations, manifesting a magneto-acoustic resonance. This
suggests the likelihood that ferromagnetic resonance, by way of
an acoustical pathway, renders metallic iron transparent to
frequencies of light in the radar to optical range. This conductor
has seemingly become an insulator, since the conductivity also
depends on the number—density.

b. Some phenomena of interest


One of the phenomena seen in the Montana testing was the
appearance of homopolar generation in the presence of electric
fields that produce large susceptibility; that is to say, special
generators that produce a voltage in neighboring conductors,

42
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

which produce no magnetic flux, yet produce a voltage and no


back e.m.f. The homopolar generator develops a motive electric
field. The electric field is produced either by the rotation of a
medium whose plane is perpendicular to the lines of a static B
field, or the medium is stationary and the lines of the B field
rotate through the medium. The purpose of a homopolar
generator is to obtain an electric field sufficient to produce a
large relative permittivity and thus attain an index of refraction
great enough to yield a significant temporal desynchronization –
something we use in inducing cells to form Bearden vacuum
engines in establishing parameter for sonobioelectrogravitic
interface.

c. Synchronization
In physical chemistry and certain physics quarters, the rich
collective behavior, including mutual entrainment and self-
synchronization, seen in systems of coupled oscillators has been
a stimulus for the long-standing interest in these systems. With
us in LPG-C, it was the mention of possibilities that biologic
matter causal induction of matter desynchronization-
synchronization was the case. Recently, attention turned to the
study of coupled chaotic oscillators and, in particular, to the
phenomenon of phase synchronization. Provided that the phase
can be defined (28) (29), two coupled nonidentical chaotic
oscillators are said to be phase synchronized if their frequencies
are locked (30) (31). This appears to be a general phenomenon
observed in such diverse systems as electrically coupled neurons,
biomedical systems, chemical systems, and spatially extended
ecological systems.
Much of the theoretical analyses of phase synchronization
have been carried out on systems consisting of two locally
coupled oscillators (31) or many globally coupled oscillators
(32). Large one-dimensional chains of locally coupled chaotic
oscillators have been investigated very recently (33), (34), (35).
Jorn Davidsen and Raymond Kapral (36) address the question
whether phase synchronization can persist in higher spatial
dimensions where topological defects can play a central role.
They also show that the existence of topological defects can lead

43
A. R. BORDON

to a breakdown of global phase synchronization in two-


dimensional arrays of nonidentical chaotic oscillators, with
interesting effects.The significance to us of the work done by the
Toronto investigators is that the existence of topological defects
can lead to a breakdown of global phase synchronization in two-
dimensional arrays of nonidentical chaotic oscillators. While
most of the medium may remain phase synchronized, oscillators
close to moving topological defects have a different frequency.
Despite this fact, the phase coherence of the system is higher
than in systems without topological defects. Davidsen and
Kapral performed a simulation of transition to phase
synchronization in 1-dimensional space, and this produced phase
clustering, but when the same was attempted in 2-dimensional
space, the transition involved point defects and was not
complete, but rather only partial.

Fig. 3 – Phase fields, all for the same realization of ω(r), in three
conditions: without topological defects, with two defects and multiple
defects (2-dimensional)

False color image False color image False color image

a. homogeneous vacuum, b. two topological c. multiple phase


topological defects defects locking of
` oscillators,
no defects
evident

A topological defect corresponds to a point in the medium


where the local amplitude is zero and the phase is not defined.5
For periodic boundary conditions, the net topological charge of
the medium is zero.6 A topological defect corresponds to a point
in the medium where the local amplitude is zero and the phase is
not defined. For periodic boundary conditions, the net
topological charge of the medium is zero. For identical chaotic
oscillators, spatially coherent spiral dynamics can still exist
implying a phase locking of the oscillations (37). If topological

44
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

defects are present, global phase synchronization is no longer


guaranteed. Since a topological defect corresponds to a point in
the system where a phase variable cannot be defined, this implies
that the concept of phase synchronization can only be applied to
parts of the system which exclude topological defects. For
discrete lattices of oscillators considered here, this does not pose
any problems because the defect is located almost surely
between lattice sites. Thus, the presence of topological defects
does not exclude global phase synchronization a priori. We
indeed observe phase synchronization for quasi-stationary
topological defects which explains the occurrence of phase
synchronization in the presence of topological defects described
by Zhou and Kurtz (38). However, the motion of topological
defects destroys phase synchronization locally.

d. Synchronization in 3-dimensional space regimes


It is now clear to us that the vacuum is source to all matter.
Essential to us is observership - the presence of observers and the
process of observation (or perspective of perceptual interface and
interaction with a process, an object, a hypersurface, or any other
element included in the statevector). What is observership
includes six classes of process, three classes of objects, and two
classes of observer design configuration. Process classes include
biosimplex unit interface, biosimplex overfunction interface,
biocomplex unit interface, biocomplex overfunction interface,
complex unit ontoenergetic interface, and complex overfunction
ontoenergetic interface. The object classes include form-based
ontobioenergetic entities, form-based ontocyborenergetic
entities, and formless ontoenergetic entities. And the two classes
of observer design configuration are mass-form design
configuration and massless design configuration. Human beings
are but one subclass of biocomplex unit interface capable
ontobioenergetic entity with a mass-form design configuration.
So what is reality for these observers? What reality do they
observe? Is the reality observed by one of one class the same as
that observed by another from the same class and from another
class? Is the reality of these observers shared, participatory and
unitive? How is reality formed? Is reality the statevector itself?

45
A. R. BORDON

Does observation = experience = interface = manifest production


observership (MPO) of a hologram-like reality?7 In other words,
how is matter synchronized in 4-spacetime reality in the presence
of observership in a given locality? And what is a human
observer’s interaction frame with the subquantum to be able to
synchronize matter at will?

The empirical evidence, in our two labs and by people we


have known who know how to achieve matter synchronization
on demand, is overwhelming: it is not only possible, it is
inevitable. In the next decade, we should be seeing replications
made of it in other labs around the world. In this monograph,
between here and the last part, we are going to have a closer look
at the physics and biophysics of sonobioelectronic and
sonobioelectrogravitic nature of living tissue matter on Earth,
and at the biogeosystemics of vacuum-plenum information
subquantum bio-information dynamics. And then, in the last part
of this monograph, we are going to discuss the algorithmic
nature of the process that makes matter synchronization on
demand (MSOD) possible, how a human being makes it happen,
and a model of how it could happen – even though there is still
much we don’t yet fully understand.

46
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

4
STRUCTURE & FUNCTION: THE PHYSICS AND
BIOPHYSICS OF THE SONOBIOELECTRONIC
AND SONOBIOELECTROGRAVITIC
NATURE OF LIVING TISSUE
AND MATTER ON EARTH

WE SAID IT BEFORE and repeat it here: the integration of


the structure that is the Unum is complete (all objects and sets
exist within it, nothing is needed it cannot create itself), whole
(the objects are amalgamations of mergers, mixtures, resonances
and harmonics), and share-distributable (all objects in all sets and
all products of all merger and mixtures and all bijections of all
harmonics and all resonances [mathematically speaking] are
continuous and wholly interconnected); it is a continuum, from
T-boundary to any surface of local space/time in the known
universe. Therein everywhere and everywhen lies the physics
and biophysics of the sonobioelectronic and
sonobioelectrogravitic nature of living tissue and matter on
Earth. In this part, we will explore how these the
sonobioelectronics of the human body and its
sonobioelectrogravitic nature lend a framework and vehicles for
the human ability we have come to technically refer to as matter
synchronization on demand, more popularly known as light
encoding of object matrices. In the rest of the monograph, we
are going to use both labels interchangeably, which is to say
synonymously.

4.1. The Unum as regimens of Space/time and Time/space


ratios

In the Unum, whether in thought-substance or in condensate


region, space/time and time/space regions are always 2-
dimensional brane-like objects, but the media in which these
ratios host can be in 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 8-, 10- or 11-dimensional
configurations. The higher the dimensional configuration of the

47
A. R. BORDON

medium, the higher the symmetry, the ordered entropy (with no


positive entropy manifest in both regions, as well as in the
unisonic belt), and energetics.
Space in s/t ratios is always 2-dimensional, with no time or t
= 0 because in nonparticulate media, the medium itself is 2-
dimensional surfaces stacked from the infinite future to the

FIG. 4
infinite past in an infinite dimensional construction or structure.
But how the medium functions in both regions is where the
symmetric and entropic arrangement calls for dimensional
configurations higher than the 2-dimensions of the surfaces.
The word surface is used because the proto-condensate as a
fluid medium of myriad surfaces is 2-dimensional. Some
physicists think of them as little fuzzy balls with a fuzzy surface
(therein the term). But actually, these flatland surfaces are two
dimensional surfaces, and are always extended to the far future
and the far past, such that their energy is also infinite. However,
there are protoparticulate fragmental glimmers (PFGs) that act
like subparticles in these media. They are grasped (i.e., sensed)
in both regions and in the unisonic.8 These PFGs, we came to
realize over the last ten years, are the locus of origin of
subparticles in the subquantum and in regular space/time. In a
recent, newer stage of understanding, we have also come to
realize that this locus of origin is akin to what Thomas Bearden

48
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

referred to as scalar or vacuum engines, perhaps by the geometry


of the structures themselves, which resemble hexagonal holes on
an otherwise seemingly surface.
Compact surfaces behave as fluid walls of PGFs which move
as though they were liquid. The vacuum as a medium is said to
consist of particles of opposite polarity, positive and negative,
that are strongly attracted to each other (39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44,
45, 46, 147, 48, 49). It is, and they are. These form a medium
that can be both homogeneous and inhomogeneous. When
homogenous and in the absence of perturbation (or a excited
state), these particles form as represented in Figure 4 above, a
seeming solid wall of condensate dipoles and quadrapoles one
could feel and catch a glimpse of their sudden luminescence, but
strangely enough, the wall was transparent to at least four of
seven neurosensors.

We now have extensive gnosive data on the particulate


region of the Unum, specifically on the quantum-vacuum, or
what is now often referred to as the subquantum vacuum-plenum
(27). We also have exact measurements of quantum contacts
which have helped us verify what we already knew gnosively:
the vacuum is made of physically detectable particles but from
non-material vacuum units that are really rotating magnetic
fields. We also now know that the precise value of these vacuum

49
A. R. BORDON

units equal to Coulomb’s constant x 16π2. By the same toke, we


also know the subquantum vacuum-plenum to be non-material
from the gravitational constant, the speed of light, the
permittivity constant, Coulomb’s constant, and the permeability
constant. We have also derived a vacuum constant (conductance)
that relates to the electromagnetism of what highlanders in Nepal
and certain Tibetan monks and cognoscenti in the Norman,
Oklahoma, USA area refer to as onta or ontah. We will honor
that name here, and use them interchangeably.
Space and time are united in ways near inseparable, with
matter manipulating the vacuum, but the vacuum giving form to
matter. This is an amazing process to witness. The blending of
time to space is in matter as frequencies of a time regime, such
that both are indivisible as
one – perhaps a deduction
arrived at by Einstein on a
purely intuitive basis. His
intuition, it that what it was,
was correct: there were two –
one which went to the far
future, the other to the far
past, both infinities in their
own right. What is most
amazing about these two
frequencies is that, although
orthogonal to each other,
together they produce what FIGURE 6
we also refer to as a unit of
resonance in the vacuum and in all domains of the Unum, in
which it expresses a quality of space resonance, unlike
space/time as a ratio in spacetime.
The vacuum, as well as condensate region particulates and
thought-substance proto-particulates, have dimensions of
reciprocal mass and reciprocal charge. Interestingly enough, the
vacuum functions much like a quantum hole (we believe this is
what Bearden referred to as his scalar engines or quantum
engines). Subparticles are there, and they as onta get their
geometry from these media, these quantum holes, as well as their

50
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

spin. These quantum engines have a kind of toroidal structure


that is quite flexible but maintains a toroidal form in the shape of
a representational double loxodrome (see Fig. 5). An electron
and a proton have ½ spin and are referred to by us as half-spin
ontah. They have the geometric constant of 8π, and the
subparticle moves around a single spherical pathway, or half a
loxodrome around both spheres. See Fig. 6 above.
The geometry above, in the images of Fig 6, are merely
representational. They represent possible paths for the angular
momentum as it spins in the vacuum units we mentioned above.
The surface area of each half-spin loxodrome is always equal to
the Compton wavelength squared. Using gravitational,
Coulomb’s, and the strong force equations, all forces are
precisely unified and well explained. The vacuum as a 2 spin
rotating magnetic field is flexible. It is thus a field where
subatomic particles can exist, because in it, it is possible to use
geometry that it is possible to discretely model electrons,
photons, protons, and neutrons and their interactions.
The angular momentum of the vacuum particulate unit is
both wave and particulate matter without being either at any one
point. All interaction of matter and light can thus be explained by
this angular momentum. The strong force is related to elementary
charge, but has a different geometry, spin and magnitude. The
weak interaction is the proportion of the elementary charge to the
strong charge. The weak interaction is equal to 8π times the fine
structure of the particle as onta.
How strong is the strong charge? Try 1.21 x 1044 newtons (or
121 million, billion, billion, billion, billion newtons). It is a huge
force in itself, and it drives the angular momentum and charge of
each onta and vacuum particulate unit. Basically, the angular
momentum of a vacuum particulate unit and the strong force or
charge describe the same onta, but from two perspective that are
at right angles from each other. And it is this force that underlies
the existence of the universe as we know it, such as it creates,
binds, and keeps it, thus also quantifying and relating to
electromagnetic, gravitational and electrostatic forces in
spacetime. So the vacuum is part of a unified Unum that
manifests as a specific kind of space, oscillating between forward

51
A. R. BORDON

and backward time and moving in quantum distance measures


(one quantum distance = Compton wavelength) in its vector
direction. In this medium, the speed of light is one quantum
distance measure multiplied by the quantum frequency. And, as
in many models of this kind, quantum measurements are
expressed not in measures of time but rather in dimensions of
frequency. So, in each quantum moment, every vacuum
particulate unit oscillates (moves) between future and past
directions, oscillating then a full cycle at the quantum frequency.
But for purposes and reasons associated with spacetime being the
innermost domain of the Unum and still expanding, spacetime
onta (electrons, proton, neutron, etc.) only move in the future
direction. Backward time is not experienced by any object made
of ontah, so living things and inert objects (no matter whether
planet-size or bigger) only experience the forward regimen of
time. It is because of the absence of experience of the backward
time regimen that onta appear to have properties called ½ spin
and forward time. So, time is directly related to the spin nature of
onta. It doesn’t stop there.
The vacuum gravitational force acts on mass as length
squared per mass squared to produce the Newtonian gravitational
constant, and the amazingly exact symmetry of Coulomb’s
constant and Newton’s gravitational constant is nothing short of
astonishing. Both seem to be based on the same quantum length
and vacuum gravitational force. This force not only exists in the
Coulomb electrostatic constant and Newton gravitational
constant, but it also constitutes a third, a “vacuum constant,” that
has been proposed by Thomson and Bourassa (50) to operate the
strong force, giving substantial evidence in favor of a much
higher Unum order.

52
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

5
MPO – BIOGEOSYSTEMICS OF VACUUM-
PLENUM INFORMATION SUBQUANTUM
BIO-INFORMATION DYNAMICS

WHEN WE FIRST PROPOSED the bitemplaic nature of


matter at a meeting of corporate and academic scientists (2001)
we thought would be receptive to new ideas, there were
physicists in the audience that did everything short of catcalls.
Much to our surprise, we also became aware of the complete
absence of in depth knowledge on their part about the
subquantum, even though there were phenomena that impinged
upon measurements they made every day. Much to our dismay,
all of them were contemptuous of the very idea of a subquantum
that regimented both form and information in 4-spacetime. At
this meeting in our lab, the senior author stated on the occasion
of a presentation about the gnosive research we had started,
“don’t think of the vacuum as absence of energy; think instead of
the vacuum as a plenum of energy and information, but
information so diffused across all quantum units that make each
of them intelligent like you and I.” The reaction among
physicists was near enough to that to a kick in the stomach.
Convulsion, we thought, was near enough, given the reaction
to the next set of statements. “Time sets a rhythm to the speed of
the frames that become reality to us, which means literally that I
am seeing all of you as rapid frames of a quantum movie in
which we all participate as actors and creators. There are several
ways to explain the next phenomenon at hand – the bitemplaic
nature of matter in our universe.” This is when several physicists
seemed ready to go into convulsion. But much to their credit,
their visceral responses to the intellectual challenge became
again contained by a stoic, poker-player controlled, air of
insouciance. “Let me remind you that the vacuum as plenum is
literally, once again, a dynamic continuum of space resonance of
each independent vacuum units. These can be manipulated as if

53
A. R. BORDON

they were gaseous matter. In fact, we have seen them behave as


perfect fluids, gas and solid all at the same time! Imagine that
every subparticle actually manipulates physical space resonance
in some ways and to some level. How?

The vacuum particulate unit folds into itself, or unfolds as


needed. Though purely representational, the loxodromes (see
Fig. 6 on page 50 and Fig. 7 above) are polar aligned both
electrostatically and electromagnetically; the negative pole is
attracted to the positive and vice versa. This, we learned from
both observation and gnosive decipherment, result in the weak
interaction from these polarities working collectively. Physical
space is toroidal in form. However, the effect of physical space,
which is orthogonally (at right angles) connected to time and
frequency, then appears to exist as a cube when plotted in
spherical coordinates.” We displayed the images (Fig 6 & 7) to a
silent audience.
Electrostatic charge polarity, dependent as it is upon the
direction of spin, makes onta most stable or least stable. Thus, it
looks like the electron and proton, most stable ontah, depend on
a specific spin direction of space-resonance. This then makes
electrostatic charge, spin, and time interrelated. The preferred

54
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

direction of spin is clockwise, or left-to-right. This brings us to


time as energy, an issue raised by the work of Nikolai Kozyrev
and other Russian scientists.
We have looked at time gnosively by looking at the extension
of frequency dimension to the far future and the far past
simultaneously. It is an energetic extension of every particulate
unit in the vacuum, and in every
other domain in both particulate
and thought-substance regions
of the Unum, including the
unisonic harmonic domain.
When we looked at time as
frequency dimension in forward
time, we realized plainly that
this is an observer artifact – a
phenomenon inevitable by the
very fact that a human observer,
as we have already stated, is
made up of the same particulate
matter as the rest of the Fig. 8 – Double cardoid field
of the heart
universe. Time became an
energetic pulse that entrained
all matter because it was an all-encompassing resonance that
pulsed in every ontah and in all underlying vacuum particulate
units. The curvature of space in spacetime was also present in the
geometry of the vacuum: the vacuum-plenum was also evidently
curved to simple gnosive observation. Our grasping of time and
space in terms of curvature implied to us that curved geometry is
inherent to the vacuum. In our model, the curved geometry of the
vacuum-plenum is a function of frequency squared. Interestingly
enough, frequency squared resolves into a sphere with a surface
constant of 4π. The rotating magnetic field is not just a single
magnetic field spinning in one direction. It is a bidirectional spin
composed of two toroidal shaped electromagnetic charges
spinning adjacent to each other, but in opposite directions.
In the two-spin version of rotating magnetic field, it is also
oscillating between forward and backward time. There are two
conformation of the rotating magnetic field. There is the two-

55
A. R. BORDON

spin manifestation, which is the complete vacuum particulate


unit and has the geometrical constant of 16π2. Then there is the
one-spin manifestation of rotating magnetic field, which applies
when two ontah bind together. One-spin rotating magnetic field
has a geometrical constant equal to the toroidal onta (4π2) times
2, because there are two oppositely spinning onta in a binding.
The bi-directional spinning toroids component of the equation
are equal to the quantum measurement unit of a double cardioid.
Consider the image of the heart field offered as Fig.8. The mass
to strong charge ratio of the ontah is the literal source of electro-
magnetism. The rotating field unit is therefore described as an
electromagnetic double cardioidal spin, or rotating magnetic
field.

5.1. Old and New Units for Redefined Phenomena

Then come photons and electrons – ontah which define the


vacuum particulate unit, as we shall see. Let’s take this forward
(looking at an electron from the vacuum to spacetime): the
photon and the electron have something in common – a discrete
relationship in the activity of electrons and the production of
photons. In plain English, the photon is literally equal to the
angular momentum (h) of the electron multiplied by the speed of
light (c). This newly defined quantity is polar, and it is a source
of magnetism. And this magnetism is a rotating magnetic field,
instead of mere energy.
Most anything electromagnetic – the strong nuclear force, the
Casimir force, Vander Waals forces, even electromagnetism – is
the work of the strong charge on the vacuum particulate units,
which is itself the magnetic field and is distributed. In this sense,
magnetic moments are cause by the physical interaction of the
electrostatic and electromagnetic charges inside each individual
onn (or stable subparticle). This also leads to the conclusion that
electrons play an important role in causing magnetic momenta of
individual ontah. Light, as physical and as vacuum phenomenon,
is the same in both – photon x frequency of production – a unit
that is also distributed. Put a different way, the photon is the

56
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

angular momentum of an electron that goes out of orbit at the


speed of light. Others equally distributed are the units of
magnetic flux, current potential and resistance. Others can be
equally reexamined accordingly.
And then there is one we developed in 2001, in
reexamination of magnetic flux: the unit of the current of an
eddy in the magnetic vacuum flow. The unit turns out to be the
redefined magnetic flux unit squared. So an eddy unit is equal to
mflx2. In the same process we also realized that the reciprocal of
magnetic flux is conductance (and not resistance, as classical
mechanics would have it). The symmetry of quantum
measurements is dazzling, and their precision amazing. There is
no doubt of their reality and accuracy and, by implication, of the
Unum’s units and structures. All functions in the particulate
region of the Unum are precisely modeled, geometrically clear
and correct, and mathematically impeccable.
Permeability is a quality of vacuum particulate unit that
refers to the degree it can be penetrated or permeated.
Permeability is a vacuum quality that hooks onto strong charge,
much like water permeates or penetrates a piece of thick cotton
cloth. The water can pass through cotton, but not without a
certain amount of drag imposed on the movement of the water.
This is the self-same effect vacuum permeability has on strong
charge. A photon is an electron’s angular momentum that burst
outward at light speed. Mass and electromagnetism are
reciprocal to each other and yet mass is linear in the
gravitational constant, but curled in the Coulomb electrostatic
constant and vacuum electromagnetic constant. Thus, we can say
that electromagnetism and gravity are two aspects of the same
thing because all mass is directly proportional to the vacuum
strong charge. And the Fine Structure constant is then a
proportion of the spherical electrostatic charge to the equivalent
spherical electromagnetic charge.
At the end of our presentation to the august group, we knew
they would not return for a visit. But, individually, they were
curious enough to call for “updates” and “progress reports.”

57
A. R. BORDON

5.2. Impact on Extension Neurosensing

As we reexamined old measures in different ways, we also


came to realize that there are alternatives to the way we could
manipulate the speed of light in extension neurosensing.
The speed of light is not the speed it takes to get from one
vacuum particulate unit to another; it is the shortest distance that
the highest frequency can encompass in a unit of forward time
(in our frame of reference). There is another scenario that could
give faster than light speed. What if we bypassed the onn-form
(subatomic structure of our bodies) altogether and modulated the
vacuum particulate unit instead? Is that possible? It is. And we
humans have been doing it for millennia. The time differential
between masses would then generate an asynchrony between the
masses, such that one can then pass right through the other. This
is precisely what happens with experienced neurosensors and the
asynchronous matter which makes up the substance of the avatar
used by a neurosensor in any extension work.
A just exploration of this phenomenon is beyond the scope of
this book.

5.3. The Vacuum and Matter in Spacetime

We have said before, in other essays to the Life Physics


Group – California membership, that life exist on Earth in an
ocean of energy. What we did not say then, that we say here, is
that this ocean is the myriad angular momentum of the countless
VPUs (vacuum particulate units). The vacuum medium is where
subparticles coexist comfortably with VPUs. The spacetime
universe is not made of atoms; it is made of VPUs, into which
angular momentum is rooted, embedded and absorbed. What we
refer to as VPUs in the Working Model is actually product of a
much more embedded unisonic process that, according to the
Working Model, takes place in the unisonic harmonic band (see
Fig. 1), between the two regions of the Unum (the thought-
substance and the condensate regions). It is this the key reason
for our referring to the inner Unum (including our spacetime

58
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

universe) as a Form-Design Continuum, where templates form


and matter is derived from VPUs.
Imagine a surface (see next page) such as this:

Then imagine that this surface has holes in the form of globes
– each globe with four possible positions that subparticles can
spin inside of each. We can imagine vacuum particulate units to
be like holes on the surface of the Form-design Continuum
having four different positions for subatomic particles to spin in,
and angular momentum is what fills the holes. These extremely
dynamic vacuum units have a specifiable measure of angular
momentum that depends on the spin position filled.
We describe vacuum unit angular momentum as a circle of
mass moving at a velocity, scanning an area. This 2-dimensional
circle of mass moves through the vacuum unit at the speed of
light. As vacuum angular momentum spins within the VPU,
vacuum conductance produces strong charge. Also, as vacuum
angular momentum spins within the vacuum itself, it picks up +/-
elementary charge from it. These three characteristics – vacuum
angular momentum, elementary charge, and strong charge give
structure to the particulate elementary particle or subparticle. In
both our Working Model and relativity theory, the neutron is a
composite of a proton and electron.
In our Working Model, a neutron’s composition involves two
separate vacuum particulate units, folded over onto each other. In
one vacuum unit, an electron occupies the electron spin position
and in the other unit, a proton assumes the proton spin position.
However, when the proton captures an electron, extra angular
momentum is also captured along with the electron. This
additional angular momentum may come from photons or it may

59
A. R. BORDON

come from neutrinos between vacuum units. Protons that capture


electron and anti-neutrino angular momentum manifest as
neutrons and, interestingly enough, so long as a neutron remains
part of a nucleus through strong charge bind, the neutron will
also not decay as it normally would. A neutrino folds into
vacuum units because it is trapped angular momentum.
Again, the ocean of angular momentum also coexists with
vacuum particulate units in a more primary space-time type of
domain. The angular momentum that draws into the vacuum by
way of the Casimir effect becomes electrons, protons, and
photons. The angular momentum that does not make it into the
vacuum, and is trapped between vacuum particulate unit folds
get to be called neutrinos. In our Model, the photon is an electron
in process of magnetic expansion. For any specific atom, angular
momentum arrives from all directions at different rates and is
captured.
The valence electron stores the angular momentum in the
positron spin position of the vacuum unit. As the quantity of
angular momentum in the valence electron increases, it
eventually reaches a point where the positron spin position is full
and angular momentum stored in the vacuum unit becomes equal
to twice the angular momentum of one electron.
Standard physics says the graviton is the quantum of the
gravitational field. It is a different language from what we use
concerning the quantum of gravity, but the graviton closely
resembles vacuum unit. Witness: both units (the vacuum
particulate unit and the graviton) have a 2-spin and zero physical
mass. But unlike the Standard Model, the vacuum particulate
unit is not only the quantum of the gravitational field; it is the
quantum of all the fields. Finally, in our Working Model, the
VPU is the only quantum capable of a field of any kind, as it also
is the genesis of space resonance.

5.4. Energy, Information and Life in the UNUM

The appearance of life as physical information we know now


begins as thought-substance information at its point of inception
– in the thought-substance region of the Unum. We have a model

60
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

of life information formation (for life processes in the thought-


substance region of the Unum) and a model of life conformation
(for life processes in the Form-design Continuum of the
condensate region of the inner Unum) to tell us how life
information begins and ultimately gets matched to a form in a
space/time ratio. The subquantum vacuum-plenum plays a
substantial role in the latter – in the conformation of life
information to a biological life form that exists in space/time.
To describe our model, we are going to use gnosive
information, on which we base the physical model of life
conformation. Life information sets (LISs), or what we refer to
as life clouds or information clouds, appear as sets of plasmoidal
flows of photons (or electron angular momentum multiplied by
the speed of light) forming a magnetic flux, the unit of which is a
unit of the magnetic vacuum flow equal to mflx2. Our
calculations tell us that electron rest energy at the moment of
superposition upon the form is in the order of 0.5 to 1.0 MeV,
with a wave frequency between 1017 and 1033 Hz, extremely high
frequencies indeed. However, as photon, the frequency of the
onn is much higher – conceivably as much as 100 times higher.5
Thus, the model requires the photon to “slow down” to half its
magnetic vacuum flux value to become an electron in space/time
as part of an information cloud.
When we reexamined our model of magnetic flux and found
that the unit of the current of an eddy in the magnetic vacuum
flow equals to mflx2, we also noted something quite interesting:
thought-enlivening of chaotic matter (as vivified matter appears
to be in 4-space/time) is a two-aspect superposition of phase-
specific high flux matter condensate (or vacuum particulate
units) onto an already self-regulating, chaotic, non-dissipating,
sexually or asexually procreating biological entity (regardless of
complexity).
The first aspect is what we came to call the “handshake,” a
quantum-level event that involves a “matching of marching
patterns.” The “patterns” refer to the “slowing down” of quantum
high energy/high frequency photons (units) of a life information
set (LIS) by transformation of unit angular momentum into
electron magnetic expansion and a lower spin number. However,

61
A. R. BORDON

this slowing down is not in reference to speed of the moving


particle, but rather the release of angular momentum as light to
continue as electron, while still remaining a vacuum particulate
unit (VPU) itself. In other words, this is the first-level interaction
of the quantum onta information cloud with the chaotic
biological entity’s atomic make up. The electrons manifest from
the release of angular momentum into electron particle in 4-
space/time then go back and forth in an elegant dance between
the vacuum unit and the biological entity’s matter. Once this
handshake is complete, and all VPUs in the information cloud at
the quantum level have conformed, the new entity is in process
of becoming a being (or as the Greek referred to as the Logos).
This transformation involved information. We will deal with
information as we use the term here in the next section.
An information cloud as defined by our Working Model is a
complex set of algorithmic, transactional, and exchange
procedures embedded in specific VPUs that congregate in a
combinatory and pairing fashion in the vacuum-plenum. Early in
our gnosive research, we referred to them as templates, but on
closer examination, we found them to be more flux in a plasmoid
fashion, such that they were distinct and distinguishable from the
environment made up of VPUs. This is where charge comes in,
and where energy as information carrier becomes available to the
developing fetus or other biological entity in development.
The second aspect then kicks in. Our Working Model sees all
stable quantum matter (onta) as essential vacuum angular
momentum. As it passes through the vacuum, this angular
momentum produces charge effects of two kinds - the
electrostatic charge, and the strong charge. An extremely precise
proportion between the spherical electrostatic charge and the
toroidal strong charge is formed and exists as the “weak
interaction,” or “charge proportion” of the onn. The electrostatic
charge is the carrier to the electrostatic force and the strong
charge is carrier to the electromagnetic or strong force. The
strong charge is also directly proportional to the mass of the onn
(by way of its angular momentum) and provides the link between
the gravitational force and strong force. In all of this, the
information carrier lies in the folds of the electrostatic force.

62
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

What is interesting is that the second aspect is a conformation of


electrostatic charge-borne information that becomes handed over
as strong charge information into the strong force of electrons,
protons, and neutrons of the atoms of a developing being. But
looking at the phenomenon at this level is, of course, not enough.
The conformation is quite extensive, and quite
comprehensive in that it is summative On the one hand, the life
fields that Burr and Gurwitsch studied conform nicely to the
information that the strong force as information carrier delivers
well as a field that sets up a resonance of all information in the
cloud as harmonic in the life fields of the developing biological
entity. On the other, the information delivered by the strong force
binds more than just electrons to nuclei in the atoms of the
developing body; it also splashes across all cells bits as
summative data that appears to generate and instills in the
developing being an ontos that we suspect provides a kind of
sense of the Logos life is.

5.5 Information Release as Second Handshake

How does it work?


Space overlaps (or fold onto itself) when two onta in the
vacuum unite due to the strong force making space fold.
Think of one being a template-like holder of the other: we
know that when two VPUs without angular momentum passing
through the ocean of surrounding VPUs don’t overlap each other
due to the fact their charges would repeal each other; but when
two onta get close to one another, their strong charges will attract
one to the other and drag the VPUs they are in to fold one on top
of the other (see Fig. 7) – much like magnets getting too close,
which make both gain energy, align their poles and finally draw
onto each other until there is contact.

At this juncture, we have gnosive reasons to suspect that the


information cloud itself is a coherent photon plasmoid with a
magnitude of information density (a la Shannon) in the order of
1018 more q-bits per Compton distance cubed than in “normal”

63
A. R. BORDON

VPU environment. Light, as we have already said above, is


essentially accelerating angular momentum. When light strikes
an atom, angular momentum from the light is absorbed and
transferred to the valence electron. The absorption is a process of
decelerating angular momentum. Herein, we now believe, lies
the second handshake that completes the superposition of
information and space/time regimes upon the entity which, to us,
now becomes a new being. Information absorbed by the forming
entity in process of becoming a new being is, we theorize now, a
matter of a relatively narrow frequency range. It is within this
range that information is transposed and reordered from a
superposition to a complete conformation. Here is how we
suspect this conformation occurs.
In one quantum moment, light arrives on the surface of the
developing biological entity, and there are a given number of
photon fronts arriving at an atom on the entity’s body. The
photon front has a certain amount of angular momentum
available to transfer to the atom, as well as information that is 6-
dimensional (3-dimensions of space, and 3-dimensions of time –
far past, present, and far future). From this arrangement of
time/space order of q-bits that the reordering and transposition
referred to above occurs. In order for that angular momentum to
be absorbed, the frequency of the arriving light must match time
frequency and space resonance of the atom or molecule receiving
the light. If this does not occur, the light (and information) will
reflect the surface.
If the frequency of the atom or molecule is a frequency of the
arriving light (even a harmonic frequency), the light will
instantly decelerate and release the angular momentum, thus be
absorbed into the atom or molecule, and assigning its vacuum
plasmoid information cloud an electromagnetic field frequency
identical to that of the receiving atom or molecule. As angular
momentum is absorbed, it is stored with the valence electron.
The atom’s storage capability exists because the valence electron
has an empty positron spin position adjacent to it in the VPU (as
all electrons do). The positron spin position and electron spin
position have opposite direction of spin and charge, but they both
hold the same quantity of angular momentum. The angular

64
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

momentum will continue accumulating and to be stored in the


positron position until the positron position is full. Here, the
reader must keep in mind that as this happens in space/time, the
VPUs superpose and uphold the resulting onn. And since the two
positions spin couple, the resulting onn is an electron twice the
size than it would be otherwise. The electron-positron coupling
occurs at their poles, which have opposite spins, so they adjoin
within the VPU, thus folding space into which we now know
information is stored and used as field bits project out
orthogonally as biophotons from the surfaces of the new entity’s
body becoming a new being.
In more ways than one, the above electron-positron pairing
shifts out of its valence orbit into a higher shell, most probably
due to the absence of negative charge in the pair and its absence
of attraction to the proton; additionally, it also describes a
Compton Effect wherein pair production happens when the
frequency of photons reaching an absorber is very high, such as
in the bombardment with nonionizing gamma rays of the
surfaces of the developing entity. Instead of a double-sized onn
jumping orbit to produce a photon, the entire double-sized onn
springs out of the atom or molecule. The like magnetic poles of
the electron and positron then repel each other into opposite
directions. And since the mass of the electron and positron are
matter and anti-matter, they also experience a gravitational
repulsion. Does this describe biologic photonic production?
The mechanics of this kind of pair production does not, in
our opinion, differ much from the Standard Model mechanics of
pair production, except that photons are viewed as the transfer of
angular momentum instead of the transfer of energy. In our
Working Model, we have said that the VPU mediates the strong
force by acting on the strong charge. In cases where the strong
charges keep a small distance apart, the VPU’s Rotating
Magnetic Field mediates the force manifesting between the
strong charges.
As ontah bind to each other, vacuum folds. The proton and
neutron have slightly different angular momenta, which tends to
get protons to join only with protons through folded VPUs, and
neutrons to join only with neutrons in like manner. Moreover, a

65
A. R. BORDON

proton and neutron can bind via electromagnetic charge (strong


force) by adjoining their magnetic orientations, with the neutron
having a neutralized electrostatic charge assisting in the process
of adjoining.
In our Working Model, we have said that photons are ontah
with an intrinsic velocity. Photons can convert to electrons
through the photoelectric effect, so that if a device is properly
constructed to produce photons via the Casimir effect, and a
circuit that converts photons to electrons is incorporated, then a
steady flow of electric current can be put into motion without the
need for a battery or dynamo. Is biological tissue one such
device?
As a direct result of strong charges continually coming in
proximity to each other in atoms and molecules, and photons
manifest between strong charges, there is a constant stream of
new primary angular momentum introduced into the visible, 4-
space/time universe. Atoms continually absorb these new
photons, converting them to electrons, positrons, and photons via
the photoelectric effect, Compton Effect, and pair production.
The same process happens between protons and neutrons to
produce ionizing and nonionizing gamma rays. Essentially, all
corona effects are photons generated by the Casimir effect. Does
that mean we have a Casimir-type effect in the production of
coronal activity when photographing a Kirlian effect off a living
being’s biological tissue mass? By what manner of mathematics
do we describe these phenomena?

5.6. Information in Subquantum VPUs and in 4-space/ time:


Connectivity and interconnectivity

Here we are using a fundamentally new mathematical


approach to physics that owes much to Claude Shannon’s
fundamentally new mathematical approach to information. Both
have taken a familiar static concept and reinterpreted it as a
dynamical concept, i.e. as being not about what is but about what
happens. Common sense tells us that information is something
contained in books, magazines, libraries, software, and other

66
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

containers of this ephemeral quantifiable quality. Shannon,


however, had a rather different take. Instead of asking for a
definition of information itself, he asked what it means to gain or
lose information. His simple but profound answer is that gaining
means narrowing the range of what is possible, and losing means
widening that range.
One might object that to know how something is gained or
lost doesn’t necessarily tell us what that something is. Shannon
would say that we can only know what information is by
knowing how it acts when it is lost and gained, just as we can
only know what wealth is by knowing how it acts when it is
accumulated and used. Both items are dynamical entities. When
modern mathematical methods were applied to this way of
looking at information, an important new science of information
emerged.
It has been well-known since Shannon’s work in the 1940s
(and those before him) that a message transmitted with optimal
efficiency over a channel of limited bandwidth is
indistinguishable from random noise to a receiver who is
unfamiliar with the language in which the message is written.
The same is equivalent for electromagnetic conformations.
We show that when electromagnetic radiation is used as the
transmission medium, the most information-efficient format for a
given message is indistinguishable from black-body radiation to
a receiver that is unfamiliar with that format. The characteristic
temperature of the radiation is set by the amount of energy used
to make the transmission and by the requirements of the
receiving medium. In this sense, the bandwidth of information
bathing should be sufficiently broad to encompass the entire
cellular-biological mass of the developing entity. Thus, we
gnosively acquire that to conform, the information cloud turns
VPUs in its hyperdense information configuration into vector
radiation whose timing, energy, polarization, longitudinal and
transverse momentum of photons and particles encoded with
information in efficient formats of 1-dimensional (black-body)
spectrum to 3-dimensional broadband nonionizing gamma ray
(and higher) level radiation. Then there is the specific collocation
of information in 3-dimensions of space, or what is referred to as

67
A. R. BORDON

spatial regimes. These, we have found, involve the use of


holographic, hologramic, and holodynamic processes involving
photonic radiant connectivity between radiant surfaces; they also
involve harmonic resonance. We speculate that phenomena
similar to those described here may apply to connectivity using
other radiative media as well.
The means to illustrate the events is to describe them through
the use of a physics developed by Tom Etter and Richard Shoup
(of the now defunct Boundary Institute in Los Altos, CA). They
call it link physics. It is based on a new dynamical concept that is
closely related to Shannon’s information, but whose subject
matter is connectivity.
How do you define connectivity? One can talk about
connectivity as being the product of the action of something that
brings and/or keeps two or more things together. There are also
abstract kinds of connections, e.g., between the past and future,
between poverty and crime, or between algebra and geometry.
How many ways are there in which we can say that A is
connected to B? So the question becomes, is there really a single
well-defined concept at all?
Connectivity. The answers to these question is that
they are framed in an unanswerable way, at least to the
satisfaction of a physicist. But, as Etter and Shoup indicate,
rather than searching for the elusive general meaning of the word
connection, they take a hint from Shannon and ask what it means
to make or break a connection. As in the case of information, this
turns out to be a much easier question. But then the reality of the
phenomenon sets in once again, and we have to deal with what
is, rather than what the mathematical method will allow us to do.
So we have to fit the math to the requirements set by the
phenomenon. In this case, as a sidebar to the requirements, we
also propose using a new paradigm for information theory which
is a synthesis of Barwise-Seligman's qualitative theory and
Shannon's quantitative theory, developed by Allwein (51). More
on this below. But back to connectivity for the moment.
One broad feature of connectivity is that when we increase
connectivity, when we add connections, then things lose some
part of their independence. Conversely, when we break

68
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

connection, things become more independent. This observation


is the starting point for our formal definition of a connection.
What, then, makes an instance of connectivity qualify as a single
connection? With an electrical device, the making of a
connection means connecting a
CONNECTIVITY RULES
wire between electrical points A AND DEFINITIONS IN
and B on which there are variable LINK PHYSICS
voltages x and y.
This reduces the range of RULE 1: Making the
connection between x and
connected possibilities for x and y. Narrowing the range of
y to just that subset for which x = joint possibilities for x and y
y. We make an electrical to that subset for which x =
connection when we force a pair y.
of variable voltages to always RULE 2: Breaking the
connection between x and
have the same value. Breaking a y. Widening the range of
connection allows the voltages on joint possibilities for x and y
x and y to vary independently. So by adding new joint
how do we describe the rules for possibilities in which x ≠ y.
this connection? Link: a dynamical pair
consisting of the make and
The sidebar to the right gives the break of a connection
the two rules of connectivity in between x and y.
Etter and Shoup’s Link physics. We’ll refer to the broken
Clearly there are degrees of being connection of a link as its
broken, ranging up to that of a open state and the made
connection as its closed
complete break that makes x and state.
y completely independent, i.e. Open link system: a
that allows every joint value of x collection of links for which
and y. These definitions are to be we are given the joint
understood as idealized possibilities for all variables.
abstractions, like points and lines.
Etter’s key definition, which closely resembles Shannon’s
definition of an item of information, and which is the basic idea
underlying all of link theory and link physics, is the definition of
a link (see sidebar).
The closed state of a link is of course determined by its open
state, since we can produce the closed state from the open state
by simply removing its unequal joint possibilities. This means
that a link, even though it involves the widening and the

69
A. R. BORDON

narrowing of a range of possibilities, is not really an item of


information, since no new information in the ordinary sense of
the word is needed to close it. Link theory is about sets of links
in which some are open and some are closed. Such a set will be
called a link system. Since an open link always determines the
structure of its closure, the basic objects of link theory, then, are
open link systems. Link physics begins by identifying a certain
sub-class of our d-matrices with von Neumann’s so-called
density matrices, which he used to represent quantum states.
Here, Allweins’s new paradigm is best viewed as a meta-
theory for Shannon information theories and allows different
probability theories, and subsequently, new Shannon information
theories, to work within a common framework. The resulting
Shannon theories conform to a qualitative structure and decorate
it with measures of information. This approach is useful for
analyzing assurance issues in interconnectivity problems where
there the analysis must contend with incomplete and even
contradictory information, or protocol is less than universal. In
particular, the mathematical constructs of the theory allow one to
use just about any logic which admits a companion measure
theory. Yet, link physics is part of the companion measure grid.
Link physics begins by identifying a certain sub-class of our
d-matrices with von Neumann’s so-called density matrices,
which he used to represent quantum states. The defining feature
of a density matrix is that it is unchanged by reversing rows and
columns. Actually, this is not quite the whole story, since one
more step is needed to make our d-matrices fully up to their job.
When we close a link, we remove some of its cases. But what if
we should remove more cases than the link has? We would then
to end up with a negative number of cases. Sounds absurd? But
when you spend more dollars than you have, don’t you end up
with a negative number of dollars? Far from being absurd, this is
the all too common condition called debt. To get link physics we
need negative numbers in our d-matrices. To get these we
generalize the notion of a link system by bringing in the idea that
such a system can go into case debt, which will be formalized by
allowing both positive and negative cases in our bookkeeping.

70
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

Once we have taken this step, the core of quantum


mechanics, which includes the Born probability rule and von
Neumann’s general dynamical rule, drops out of our formalism
in a few simple steps. The condition that defines links as
quantum and thus leads to these results is simply that they are
symmetrical in x and y. But what about other kinds of links? It
turns out that if links have a certain simple form of asymmetry,
the very same algebraic rules that characterize the quantum core
now become the core laws of ordinary “classical” statistical
processes. This includes Markov chains and diffusion processes,
complete with time’s arrow and the non-decrease of entropy.
And then, there is interconnectivity – a condition also seen in
much of the phenomena of the Unum.
Interconnectivity. Our current approach to the
phenomenon of interconnectivity is framed in terms of the work
by Bennett and Wiesner on one- and two-particle operators on
Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states, and the work of Leung, Hayden,
and Winter on superdense coding of quantum states. We view
the phenomenon of interconnectivity in terms of superdense
coding of quantum states shared by two or more source-recipient
pairs, expressed as three states in an interconnectivity spectrum:
interface (maximally entangled state between source-recipient
pairs, with superdense coding of quantum states), interaction
(optimally entangled state between source-recipient pairs, with
superdense coding of quantum states), and intercommunication
(optimally entangled state between one or more individualized
source-recipient pairs, with superdense coding of quantum states
between them, in which the interconnectivity is initiated by a
source and joined by the recipient).
At the most individualized source-recipient pair condition, a
source's means to communicate with a receiver is frequently
enhanced if the two parties share entanglement. The most well-
known example of this phenomenon is perhaps superdense
coding (52), the communication of two classical bits of
information by the transmission of one quantum bit and
consumption of one ebit. If the sender knows the identity of the
state to be sent, superdense coding of quantum states also
becomes possible, with the result that, asymptotically, two qubits

71
A. R. BORDON

can be communicated by physically transmitting one qubit and


consuming one bit of entanglement (53, 54). Furthermore, in (53)
it was shown that a source can asymptotically share a two-qubit
entangled state with a receiver at the same qubit and ebit rate,
along with the consumption of some shared randomness. That
result, however, failed to exploit one of the most basic
observations about superdense coding: highly entangled states
are much easier to prepare than non-entangled states. Indeed,
maximally entangled states can be prepared with no
communication from the sender at all – which is precisely what
we saw gnosively in interface, interaction, and communication
between information clouds and living biological tissue at
conformation.
Quantum information theory, it has been said, can be
described as the effort to identify and quantify the basic
resources required to communicate or, more generally, process
information in a quantum mechanical setting (55). The dual goals
of identifying new protocols and demonstrating their optimality
have, respectively, helped to expose the surprising range of
information processing tasks facilitated by quantum mechanics
and highlighted the subtle ways in which physics dictates
limitations on the transmission and processing of information.
The Unum, however, presents new challenges, and represents
completely new requirements in conceptualizing theory/model
on how, for instance, information clouds superpose and conform
with the biological tissue of partnering biological entities.
Part of the appeal of the information theoretic paradigm is
that it emphasizes the notions of interconvertibility and
simulation. Identifying basic resources and evaluating their
interconvertibility provides a general strategy for systematically
charting the capabilities of quantum mechanical systems. The
last ten years have seen major advances in the area, including,
among many other discoveries, the determination of the classical
capacity of a quantum channel (56, 57), the capacities of
entanglement-assisted channels (58, 59), the quantum capacity of
a quantum channel (60, 61, 62), and the best ways to use noisy
entanglement to extract pure entanglement (63) or send classical
information (64).

72
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

Without getting into the mathematics required to explore and


explain how maximally entagled states can be prepared with no
communication with source, we can look at how could Nature
construct protocols that take advantage of this effect, finding that
even partial entanglement in the state to be shared translates
directly into a reduction in the amount of communication,
interaction or interface required. Every bipartite pure state can be
written mathematically. Since Schmidt coefficients are the only
local invariants, they determine the entirety of the nonlocal
features of the state. In the case of one-shot superdense coding,
we find that it is the largest Schmidt coefficient that plays a
crucial role. More specifically, we need to describe how source
can share with recipient any pure state that has reduction on the
recipient system of dimension dS and maximum Schmidt
coefficient by transmitting amounts of qubits and consuming
certain other amounts of ebits. We also need these rates to be
essentially optimal. Are there protocols that meet our needs?
Yes, there are.
In 2006, Anura Abeyesinghe, a young Ph.D. graduate from
Cal Tech came up with suitable ones. In Chapter 1 of his
dissertation (55), he writes a pure state, based on the work of
Nielsen and Cheung (65). Abeyesinghe showed us how source
and recipient share pure states, has reduction on recipient’s
system of dimension dS and maximum Schmidt coefficient √λmax
by transmitting roughly 1/2 log dS + 1/2 log λmax qubits and
consuming 1/2 log dS - 1/2 log λmax e-bits, also showing that the
rates were essentially optimal. Referring to it as the “father of the
noiseless, visible state communication protocol,” he composed it
with teleportation and inspiration from Harrow’s work (66), such
that the first generates an optimal remote state preparation
protocol, and the second provides strong evidence that the
protocol Abeyesinghe presents us should exist in Nature.
In the rest of the chapter, the Abeyesinghe presents the
universal protocol for superdense coding of entangled states and
then prove its optimality, along with that of the associated
remote state preparation protocol. The next section contains an
easy application of typical subspace techniques to the task of
developing an optimal protocol for preparing states generated by

73
A. R. BORDON

a memoryless source. The following one provides another


application of the protocol, this time to the theory of
identification. Specifically, the author shows that the quantum
identification capacity of an ebit is two qubits, and then goes on
to present the universal protocol for superdense coding of
entangled states and then prove its optimality, along with that of
the associated remote state preparation protocol. Finally, the
author then presents a couple of applications of interest to us: an
easy application of typical subspace techniques to the task of
developing an optimal protocol for preparing states generated by
a memory-less source (which also led us to one for dense
coding/dense memory vacuum source), and another application
of the protocol, this time to the theory of identification,
specifically showing that quantum identification capacity of an
ebit is two qubits.
Questions remain concerning efficient constructions of
protocols, even though we may yet not have the means to “read”
Nature’s mind, we may have a way of deciphering her ways of
doing things in polynomial time. Stronger success criteria are
also needed, specifically regarding the possibility of superdense
rates of exchange between two sources that act as both source
and receiver simultaneously (a commonplace event in our
gnosive reception of data in bitemplaic intercommunication
conditions).
Specifically, we are interested in universal remote state
preparation protocols developed by Bennett et al (67), which
produce an exact copy of the desired state when the protocol
succeeds, not just a high fidelity copy. We don’t ask the same
question that Abeyesinghe asked in his dissertation (Is such a
probabilistic-exact protocol possible in the superdense coding
setting?) because we know and have seen in bitemplaic
intercommunication events that such superdense
coding/superdense memory that protocols which are probabilistic
must behave as exact, given the results witnessed. Same applies
to superdense setting/superdense memory coding, remote state
preparation, and quantum identification capacity in both blind-
and nonblind-scenario conditions. Abeyesinghe claimed that it is
possible to achieve ID rate of two qubits per ebit in the case

74
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

when the identity of the encoded qubits is know, but it is not


clear whether this rate is possible when the identity of the qubits
is unknown. We know it is; gnosive evidence is compelling.
What we don’t yet know is whether or not superdense
coding/superdense memory settings in the vacuum and biological
tissue intercommunicate, interact, or interface – or all three
processes according to parameters and needs we yet to decipher
and thus don’t fully understand.

75
A. R. BORDON

6
VACUUM-ENERGETIC ENCODING OF MATTER
MATRICES – THE PHYSICS & BIOPHYSICS
OF THING OUT OF NO-THING ON
PURPOSE

IN THE SUBQUANTUM PERSPECTIVE, the critically


coherent COBE is seen as an implicated bitemplaic polycausal
holonomic projection of informational essence into space by way
of a body-mind. The time and gravielectric components of this
highly complex structure are under common subquantum (SQ)
origination and control as a combinatorial metastructure of
hyperdimensional consistency. The idiomaterial Universe view is
inherent to our defining the infinitesimal SQ entity, which, in the
SQ model, extends into pure information fields encompassing an
infinity of manifestation potentials. This results in an asymmetric
monistic determinism of enfolded informational configurations
upon the energetics involved in conventional causality, turning
them into chains of time-bound sequences that are perceived by
the COBE observer, which itself is seen as embedded in the
hyper dimensional implication whole, by resonances occurring at
a holographic interaction level. The phenomenology of
perception is best described in terms of this resonant tuning
between self-conscious observer (the core function of the COBE)
and the events that are ceaselessly reconfiguring enfolded layers
of a kaleidoscopic, dynamic and interconnected background at
different levels of implication.
The self's perception modalities extend both upon upward
sensory-derived signal matrices integrating it into its
environment, and downward, direct, extra sensorial,
representational inputs. Running in SQ regime, these convergent
Information channels synchronously affect quantum events seen
as their confluent expression in the domain of space-time-defined
energy - which is their observable manifestation range in the

76
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

Euclidian projection of the extended, projective informational


space.
The intertemplaic connection (or the "handshake") reflects
our asymmetrical determinacy upon observable features and
behavior patterns of the COBE as a range of complexity, with
polyvalent integration in the infinite array of implicate domains.
It's quite reasonable to describe bitemplaic junction resolutions
forming at interaction sites between proximity distributions of
these implication domains. The biosystem itself is such an
intertemplaic junction effect, hence our ability to identify at its
resolution level the interplay between its overlapping entelechial
components. From a perspective (read that to mean, a position of
observership) in spacetime, we say that anything beyond this
smallness and the length of the diameter of the hole that connects
or separates this other space from that which is our space must be
the quantum. It was further assumed at the beginning of our
awareness of the quantum that nothing could be smaller than a
quantum. So from such an unsupported assumption, theorists
reached the view that the Planck length must represent the lower
limit of smallness in our Reality.
Many, however, have gone further to suggest that there are
fluctuations and activity beyond this limit, and that they must be
caused by particles smaller than the Planck limit. We have thus
seen the rise of a subquantum level of recognized manifestation –
because it is now possible to see beyond the Planck length with
subquantum microscopes, and a subquantum picture of the world
has been repeatedly proposed by many serious researchers in the
past. Such second-order physical events - if true - seem to imply
that there can be entities smaller than the quantum, that quanta
can be subdivided, and that there may exist somewhat
"counterintuitive" charge values, smaller than the so-called
"elementary" charge.
The physical vacuum is a space/time sequence contending
both aggregative and non-aggregative, nascent information
sources, where such information is stored and carried by
superluminal aether fluxes leading to n-degree entanglement
states at the level of the matter/energy domain. These

77
A. R. BORDON

subquantum fluxes result in the Quantum Potential, and the


quantum information field, of standard Quantum theory.

6.1. Information from the Infinite to the Infinitesimal

The vacuum has many physical properties which imply a


substantive medium. For example, the vacuum has:

A modulus of elasticity
A stress tensor
A sheer tensor
Magnetic permeability coefficient
Magnetic susceptibility
A bulk modulus
A modulus of conductance
A modulus of compulsive enforcement
A characteristic E/M wave impedance of 377 Ohms

The vacuum has many other known and measurable physical


properties which are not found in the above list. All these
measurements, and others, strongly imply the existence of a
substance. Indeed, were one given the parameters of the
substantive vacuum without being informed as to what was being
measured, it would be easy to think that some sort of material
was being described, rather than a "vacuum." It has been
experimentally demonstrated that the so-called "vacuum" has a
memory. This discovery was made possible by the extremely
sensitive micro-field measurement abilities of the Malvern laser
electromagnetic measurement system out of the UK (68; 204).
Many similar observations have brought forth the questions, "
How can a supposed nothing have any sort of memory?", and,
"What is it that is holding the information we are observing, if
there is nothing there to hold it?". Since that time, many
additional unexpected experimental results, and instrumented
observations, have demonstrated the active role which eidetic
information has at all levels of physical existence.
Local information-guided measurements were produced over
decades of astrophysical and laboratory observations, by

78
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

Kozyrev, Mishin, and others, beginning in the 1960s, which


demonstrate a vast variety of mechanisms which will act to
measurably liberate some sort of entities which are
interpenetrating with, and clinging to, normal matter. Kozyrev
observed that the following processes acted to liberate something
which had been previously unaccounted for, something internal
to matter, with direct and physically observable instrumentable
consequences under the following circumstances:

* the deformation of any physical object


* the encounter of an air or water jet, with an obstacle
* the operation of an hourglass filled with sand
* the absorption or emission of light
* friction
* burning
* the physical actions of an observer, such as a movement
of the head
* the heating or cooling of an object
* phase transitions in substances (evaporation, solid to liquid,
liquid to vapor, etc.)
* dissolving and mixing rates of chemical substances
* the "fading" death of plants
* "non-light radiation" from astronomical objects
* changes in human emotional states and states human
consciousness.

All these events are liberating some sort of entities from their
clinging existence, as normally found in the vicinity of various
objects. Apparently, these behaviors can arise because the mass
of the liberated entities is so small, it is very easy to move them.
Even an act of will can liberate these entities into motion. The
resulting release of entities, under these circumstances, registers
directly on various forms of instrumentation. All the items in the
above list were proved experimentally by Kozyrev, under very
stringent and rigorous conditions (39).
People at the time, had no reason to accept Kozyrev's
brilliant results, until now, when they are seen as integral to the
subquantum paradigm, and represent the earliest such

79
A. R. BORDON

experimental evidences. Kozyrev attempted in several other


ways, to bring public attention to these entities and their
properties, such as his published and verified astronomical
observations of "mass density waves", which are exactly waves
propagating in an interstellar media composed of very small
entities. Remote non-local information-guided activities,
including remote non-local information coupled variations in
weight, pH, and so on, have been recently discovered to be
fundamental to the functioning of the universe at all scales, at all
levels, in all regards, at all times.
Normal electromagnetic waves ride on the subquantum,
where infinitesimal SQ entities with fractional charge and
fractional masses are supplying the physical environment which
the "elementary" particles and forces are operating in, according
to subquantum canon of collective behavior principles (as
described for example, by the Fermi-Pasta-Ulam lattice model)
(27). Such sub-Planck behaviors are not presently detectable by
standard instrumentation, but they are still affecting, in a
deterministic way, all our presently accessible observables, such
observable events attesting to the event-controlling information-
based potentials which are ubiquitously present in the SQ
background, which comprises the actual substance of the
physical vacuum. In fact, all the physically measurable properties
of the "vacuum" are the direct result of the physical behaviors
and properties of various SQ entities that inhabit "free space",
which when averaged produce the accustomed measured
physical values associated with the "physical vacuum, such as
the permittivity and permeability values of the media, which in
turn determine such things as the speed of light at the given time
and place.
Let’s begin here on the infinity side of things, and state
outright that we are living in a universe that exhibits accelerating
expansion in (approximately) four space-time dimensions, with a
de Sitter spacetime metric with cosmological constant Λ = 1.29 ×
10−52[m−2] (69, 70, 71, 72, 73).
A small cosmological constant is equivalent to a small
vacuum energy density (dark energy density with equation of
state w = −1) given by

80
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

(6)
In quantum field theory, the cosmological constant counts the
degrees of freedom of the vacuum. Heuristically, we may sum
the zero-point energies of harmonic oscillators and write:

(7)
The sum is manifestly conflictive at best. The natural
maximum cutoff to impose on a quantum theory of gravity is the
Planck frequency, leading to the Planck energy density of the
vacuum:

ρP = EP /l3P = c7_ = 4.6×10113[J/m3] (8)


2
G h

This prescription yields an ultraviolet enumeration of the


zero-point energy that is 122 orders of magnitude above the
measured value, Eq.(6). This is the well-known cosmological
constant problem.

6.2. A Natural Scale for Vacuum Energy in Living


Super-conductivity

What is the domain of physics and phenomenology that


provides a natural scale for dark energy? In fact, the observed
dark energy scale from the vacuum-plenum is very similar to
typical energy scales that occur in solid state physics in the
physics of superconductors, except that the superconductors are
solgel phases of living, crystalline superconductors. The
principal idea discussed in recent papers (74, 75, 76) is that this
is not a random coincidence, but that there is a deep physical
reason for this coming from a similar structure of the theory of
superconductors and that of dark energy. A possible model in
this direction is the Ginzburg-Landau theory of dark energy as
developed in (75). In that model vacuum fluctuations exhibit a

81
A. R. BORDON

phase transition from a gravitationally active to a gravitationally


inactive state at a critical frequency, similar to the
superconductive phase transition at a critical temperature. On the
experimental side, there is an interesting possibility arising out of
this approach, namely that super-conductors could be used as
suitable detectors for quantum fluctuations underlying vacuum
energy (74, 75). Moreover, there are also indications that living
superconductors could also be suitable detectors of such quantum
fluctuations and are suitable means of drawing on underlying
vacuum energy (27, 74, 75, 76).
We took Beck and de Matos to task: If one begins from an
Einstein-Hilbert action that leads to an inverse cosmological
constant problem, we found, as they did, that the cosmological
constant comes out too small by 120 orders of magnitude! So we
too regarded the observed dark energy density of the universe as
the geometric mean of two values of vacuum energy, one 120
orders of magnitude too large and the other 120 orders of
magnitude too small – in the same fashion as Beck and de Matos
did in 2008, with one difference: we were not looking at dark
energy values in cosmological terms; we were looking at living
superconductors becoming suitable detectors, extractors and
users of vacuum-plenum energy for health maintenance, MPO
(manifest production observership) effects, VEEOM (vacuum
energetic encoding of object matrices), and other purposes. The
corresponding mean energy scale is the Planck-Einstein scale,
corresponding to lengths of about 0.037mm, a natural scale both
for dark energy in cosmological terms and vacuum-plenum
energy in a biological framework, and living superconductive
materials.
Very interesting things happen out of the fact that the
relevant length scale for quantum fluctuations is the Planck-
Einstein scale in superconductive materials.
Basically, the Beck and de Matos model for quantum
fluctuations in the superconductor is like a model of quantum
gravity where the Planck mass mP = (ħc/G)1/2 is replaced by a
much smaller value, the Planck-Einstein mass mPE =
(ħ3Λ/cG)1/4. Formally replacing the Planck mass by much
smaller values has also been discussed in the context of extra

82
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

dimensions (77). The approach here does not require extra


dimensions but just a superconducting environment.
We also observed under gnosive conditions the formation of
ember-like clusters of particle-like superconductive sparks,
similar to the so-called Tao balls (78, 79, 80) in this context, a
phenomenon that is so far unexplained in the usual theory of
superconductors, but which can be understood using the Beck/de
Matos approach.

FIGURE 10
The Planck-Einstein scale corresponds to the geometric
mean value between the Planck scale, lP , which determines the
highest possible energy density in the universe, and the
cosmological length scale, or Einstein scale, lE = Λ−1/2, which
determines the lowest possible energy in the universe. The
Planck-Einstein energy density is the geometric mean ρPE =
√pρP ρE between the two energy densities, and the Planck-
Einstein length lPE = √lP lE is the geometric mean of the two
length scales in the universe (81, 72, 73).
We noticed that the values of Planck-Einstein quantities
correspond to typical time, length or energy scales in
superconductor physics, as well as to typical energy scales for
dark energy. In previous papers by Beck and de Matos (73, 74,

83
A. R. BORDON

75) they showed there could be a deeper reason for this


coincidence: It was possible to construct theories of dark/vacuum
energy that bear striking similarities with the physics of
superconductors. In these theories, the Planck-Einstein scale
replaced the Planck scale as a suitable cutoff for vacuum
fluctuations.
Beck and de Matos proceeded on the basis of the hypothesis
that when proceeding from a normal to a superconducting
environment it makes sense to consider a scale transformation
from the Planck length to the Planck-Einstein length, which
keeps many features of the quantum physics invariant. Quantum
gravity phenomena that normally happen at the Planck scale lP
only could possibly induce related phenomena at the Planck-
Einstein scale in a superconducting environment. Due to our
scale transformation, the gravitational constant G = ħc/m2ρ
formally becomes much stronger in a superconductor if mP is
replaced by the much smaller value mPE. Similarly, frame
dragging effects and gravitomagnetic fields could become much
stronger as well, in line with recent experimental observations
(74, 75, 76). The vacuum energy density of vacuum fluctuations
would become much smaller as well (of the order of dark energy
density).
Re-interpreted in terms of the scale transformation, this
means that for superconductors the Planck scale mP as a cutoff
for vacuum fluctuations is formally replaced by something of the
order of the Planck-Einstein scale, since the critical temperature
Tc = 1...140K of normal and high-Tc superconductors is of the
same order of magnitude as the Planck-Einstein temperature TPE
= 60.7K. Therefore, our use of the scale transformation
hypothesis makes sense for vacuum fluctuations and vacuum
energy as observed in a living superconductor superconducting
environment. The relevant scale factor is of the order lPE/lρ ~1030.

6.3 Is the Vacuum Homogeneous?: What Is and What


Isn’t

It was almost preposterous, but the caller was quite adamant.

84
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

What Is: Digital Evidence

There were lights that would glow at night, reddish, greenish


balls of light skating near the ground at the entrance to the
property. You could see them sometime even during the day,
when the sun was covered by clouds. Then the pictures began to
arrive, and some video
samples as well. In
some pictures, the
energetics were quite
evident, from string-
like to arm size, in
every conceivable
shape and form, bright,
colorful, eerie.
The year was 1995
and the caller was from
north Texas.
The subject of the
call and the pictures Fig 11a - Northt Texas – Night time
was what we had, at
least in house, come to call subquantum bleeds – manifestations
of ostensibly subquantum energetics that was evident and
detectable, even by human senses, in the immediate environment
under varying conditions. The pictures began to arrive not just
from Texas, but soon thereafter from Wisconsin and Montana
and Oregon and Washington and Vermont – in these United
States. Then from Chile, Argentina, Bolivia and Peru. Then from
other places as well. The photos speak for themselves, and these
are only a few of the many sent to us.

What Is: The physical properties of vacuum domains

It was soon obvious to us we were dealing with physical


phenomena that was, at least in the frame of reference of our
local spacetime, anomalous. We had, since 1995, learned that
subquantum vacuum domains, which are local formations of a
non-homogeneous physical vacuum, are transformers of

85
A. R. BORDON

gravitational energy into electromagnetic energy and the reverse


and of both these types of energy into mechanical and thermal
energy. This grasp and understanding facilitated a host of
interrelated phenomena product-
ion, some with quite dramatic
effects, while others were
curiosities appearing as seeming
coincidences. More specifically,
we refer to MPO (manifest
production observership) effects,
and human-precipitated VEEOM
(vacuum energetic encoding of
North Texas – In the shade,
object matrices) phenomena on daytime
demand.
Vacuum domains have
volume and a corresponding
boundary surface. The equations
of the non-homogeneous
physical vacuum model together
with the equations of the
electronic theory of matter and
continuum mechanics, as well as
the conditions on the surfaces of
the vacuum domains and at Fig. 11b - Wisconsin
infinity, make it possible to
formulate typical boundary-value problems of mathematical
physics. The solution of such problems can help us obtain
theoretical physical properties of the vacuum domains in any
media and fields, such as those of the Earth (82). Vyacheslav
Vyatlov, Scientific Fellow at the S. L. Sobolev Institute of
Mathematics of the Russian Academy of Sciences Siberian
Division, offers the following properties of physical vacuum
domains:

1. Penetration into matter or passage through matter in any


of its phase states: plasma, gas, liquid and solid.

86
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

2. Self-luminescence, emission of electromagnetic waves in


a broad frequency spectrum, and absorption of electromagnetic
waves.
3. The presence of their own electrical, magnetic and gravity
fields inside and outside the vacuum domains.
4. Intense rotation of the gas inside the vacuum domains
with a change in the magnetic and spin fields of the Earth.
5. Two types of explosions with the preservation of the
vacuum domains: explosions as a result of an electrical discharge
inside the vacuum domains, and contact explosions as the
vacuum domains penetrate from the gas of the atmosphere into
the electrically conductive rock of the Earth, as well as in
passage through the Earth’s ionosphere (82, p. 12).

Our digital photographic and video evidence bear out these


properties. Shipov (83) expresses the current physical ideas
about the nature of the physical vacuum: “At the beginning of
the twentieth century, with the development of Maxwell-Dirac
quantum electrodynamics, on the one hand, and Einstein’s theory
of gravitation, on the other, a new level of reality – the physical
vacuum – had already appeared in theoretical physics as an
object for research; in the process, theories differing in nature
were producing different ideas about it. While the vacuum is
considered as empty four-dimensional space-time produced by
Riemann’s geometry in Einstein’s theory, the vacuum (globally
neutral) in Maxwell-Dirac electrodynamics is a kind of “boiling
soup” made up of virtual electron particles and positron
antiparticles. Further development of quantum field theory
demonstrated that the ground state of all quantum fields – the
physical vacuum – is formed not only by virtual electrons and
positrons but also by all the other known particles and
antiparticles in a virtual state. In order to unify these two
different ideas about the vacuum, Einstein put forward a program
that came to be called the Unified Field Theory Program.” On
page 74, Shipov further tells us, “it is becoming clear now that
the unified field theory program has grown and overflowed into
physical vacuum theory, which is called upon to explain not only
the phenomena of objective physics but also psychophysical

87
A. R. BORDON

phenomena.” Does this mean observership (the phenomenon


defined by our Working Model as participatory interaction
between matter and observer as complex oscillating system in a
specifiable level of manifestation) has a role in vacuum theory?
We are not quite there yet, but are now heading in that general
direction.
In October 1974, international teams of scientists in the
United States and Switzerland discovered a new particle – J/Ψ .
It proved very heavy (some three nucleon masses) and long-
lived. They were called quarks. A characteristic feature of these
particles is the fact that no one ever saw them in pure form –
only in combination with other particles. Quantum
chromodynamics is then created. In this theory, quarks
correspond to electrons, and gluons (particles with zero mass and
a spin of 1, which effect the interaction between quarks)
correspond to photons, but carry a new charge that is referred to
a now as “color.” Quarks has three varieties of “color,” and
gluons have eight. The open particle J/Ψ was composed of a
quark and an antiquark of a new type called charm, or c-quark.
Then it turned out, after numerous observations and calculations,
that neither quarks nor gluons (i.e., the entire color world inside
us and in the surrounding matter) ever escape into outside space:
they are locked inside hadron particles. This phenomenon was
called confinement (or capture).
In quantum chromodynamics, the physical vacuum is
considered as a lattice, at the nodes of which are located pairs
made up of a c-quark and a c-antiquark connected by a "string";
i.e., these quarks at spaced some distance apart and are dipoles.
Such a structure means that the physical vacuum is formed from
dipoles and in macroscopic terms is a polarization medium.
Thus, we now have the physical nature of the physical vacuum as
an electrical and a magnetic medium at the same time; and, the
physical vacuum can be represented as a polarization medium
using Maxwell and Heaviside vacuum equations for this purpose,
with inductions seen as polarizations of the physical vacuum.
This, according to Shipov (86), is the absolute physical vacuum
(or APV, for short).
And now things begin to get interesting.

88
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

A Physical Vacuum That Is NOT Homogeneous

APV is a mathematical construction described by four vector


fields - electrical, magnetic, gravitational, and spin, plus four
vector polarizations – inductions of the same type. These
physical polarizations make for the possibility of finding
magnetic and spin polarizations, and electrical and gravitational
polarizations occurring as natural phenomena in Nature. If we
look at these as possible relationships, then the physical vacuum
is an interesting medium: “the majority of elementary particles
simultaneously possess electrical charges and masses, and
magnetic moments and spins, and the physical vacuum can be
represented as a medium populated by such elementary particles,
even if they are quarks, but in the form of dipoles” (84) (p. 22).
So we can think of many of the physical polarization phenomena
in matter and in the physical vacuum as being of the same kind
and nature. This is quite significant to us, from the viewpoint of
MPO and human-precipitated VEEOM on demand.
The sense of physical vacuum we now have requires that
gravitational dipoles have to be represented as linked pairs of
elementary positive and negative masses. Negative mass is a
requirement of Shipov’s polarization model of the physical
vacuum. In 1893, in a prestigious publication of the Royal
Society, Oliver Heaviside publishes "On the Forces, Stresses,
and Fluxes of Energy in the Electromagnetic Field,"
(Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society - London)
183A, 423-480, 1893. In it, he discusses the Faraday-Maxwell
ether medium, outlines his vector algebra for analysis of vectors
without quaternions, discusses magnetism, gives the EM
equations in a moving medium, and gives the EM flux of energy
in a stationary medium. Heaviside’s equations describe gravity in
an infinite universe, for which then negative mass is necessary,
which brings up the issue of infinite potential of any gravitational
object (or gravity paradox).
In accepting negative mass, one must therefore accept the
quadrigue (group of four) of particles of Terletskiy (86), which is
neatly buttressed by Dirac’s quadrupling of states in his quantum

89
A. R. BORDON

theory. It is also a remarkable turn of events in the modeling of


the physical vacuum as a polarizing medium. Terletskiy’s
quadrigue is actually four particles (or, actually, four electrical
charges, masses, magnetic moments and spin moments), the sum
of which equal zero – from which, interestingly enough, one can
derive any two pairs of particles in which their electrical charges,
masses, magnetic and spin moments equal zero! This allows
theorists to build a basic model of cella (or distinguishable
compartments) of the physical vacuum as a whole-cloth neutral
polarizing medium, from which then three kinds of physical
vacuums can manifest: (a) an absolute physical vacuum,
represented by the quadrigues; (b) a physical vacuum of matter,
which is made up of particles, one of which is an ordinary one;
and (c) a physical vacuum of antimatter, which is made up of
particle pairs, one of which is an antiparticle. What is most
remarkable is that the absolute physical vacuum is described
quite well by Maxwell and Heaviside equations, and thus in the
absolute physical vacuum, the polarization model breaks down
into two independent models: the Maxwell theory of
electromagnetism, and the Heaviside theory of gravitational spin.
But in physical reality, the relationships of electrical and
gravitational polarizations and of magnetic and spin polarization
in the absolute- as well as in the physical matter vacuums come
out as quite a unified system of equations that become the basis
of a combined electrogravitodynamic model of matter
electrogravitogeneration (via electrical charges and magnetic
polarizations) and continuum dynamics (via masses and
moments of the quantity of movement set by way of the
Heaviside equations).
In the model discussed here, the physical vacuum is a
heterogenous medium, an aspect of which is a homogenous,
isotropic polarization medium (which is regarded as the absolute
physical vacuum). This vacuum is found in all material
conformations. Matter is that which possesses positive mass and
is located in the same space as the absolute physical vacuum. At
the same time, there is also another aspect of the heterogeneous
medium present in the same space: distributed negative mass as
well as the vacuum domains of physical vacuums of matter and

90
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

antimatter, which are polarization media. These two latter


physical vacuums interact with the absolute physical vacuum,
which weaken the electrical and gravitational relationships
within the vacuum domains. This nonhomogenous vacuum then
becomes a physical vacuum of multiple types. But even
hydrodynamic models of the ether, however, fail to make
possible a deep and convincing explanation for the effects in
question. A considerably more substantial model of the physical
vacuum, possibly based on the idea of the existence of diffuse
vacuum domains, is necessary for this purpose. It is this then that
we pursue with what we have termed Working Model. As the
subtitle of this essay aimed to indicate, pilot-wave theories,
subquantum mechanics and subquantum information are not
enough. The concept of the basic object of the non-homogeneous
physical vacuum – makes it possible to define in explicit and
concrete form one of the fundamental and extremely timely
problems of physics now and in the future: the perception of the
physical vacuum as a polarization medium possessing a very
wide, very rich spectrum of states and manifestations of those
states.
Akimov’s schematic conception of the polarization states of
the physical vacuum (87) is of great importance to the
development of macroscopic models of it. Akimov represented it
as a structured medium, the elementary cell of which – the fiton
– contains a particle-antiparticle pair. The fact that particles-
antiparticles simultaneously possess electrical charges and
masses, and magnetic moments and moments of the quantity of
motion – spins – drew our attention. This indicated that the
physical vacuum could appear simultaneously as electrical,
magnetic, gravitational and spin polarization media. What was
significant about Akimov’s theory was that it takes modeling
back to the idea of the physical vacuum as an ether medium – a
polarization ether medium. Its significance to science and to us is
that it has relationships to both electrodynamics and
gravitodynamics, and offer polarizations as measurable variables
– something that can happen only in a macroscopic model of the
physical vacuum. So we took Dyatlov’s lead (82) and put
Akimov’s fiton together with Terletskiy’s quadrigues to get a

91
A. R. BORDON

unified symmetrical system of electrical, gravitational, magnetic


and spin polarization. On the basis that the particle-antiparticle
pairs simultaneously possess positive and negative charges and
masses, as well as magnetic moments and spins, one can then
expect connections of the electrical and gravitational polarization
and the magnetic and spin polarizations.
In dielectric and magnetic polarization media, polarizations
characterize the state of matter itself, while the fields are factors
of the change in these states. The polarization values in
dielectrics and magnetics are actually related to the
configurations of the electrical dipoles and magnetic moments,
while the fields are related to the forces that cause variations in
these configurations. Hence the fields prove to be the cause,
while the polarization is the effect of this cause.

FIGURE 12 - Circulation of matter in the universe


(Adapted from Dyatlov 1998)

92
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

One can then say in this connection that the polarization-


field idea has been confirmed in the polarization matter theories
as a combination of representations of the interactions of various
fields with dielectrics and magnetics.
Our work with MPO and human-precipitated VEEOM on
demand has shown us that polarizations of matter do not differ
from polarizations of physical vacuum. The approach to one or
the other remains the same: thus, it is quite elegant to find out a
total similarity of the polarization-field conception in
electrodynamics, and, consequently, in electrogravidynamics as
well, and the conception of generalized coordinates and
generalized forces in mechanics.
This, in our point of view, helps in the understanding of how
MPO and VEEOM on demand work: obviously the generalized
coordinates correspond to polarizations, while the generalized
forces correspond to fields. And this took us to further
realizations: that applications of vector-intention by a human
COBE with an appropriate increase in self-induced cellular
electrical capacitance and the application of specific sound
sequences upon the thought of an object can and does produce
that object eventually; that this effect can be produced by a
human operator or by a carefully modulated apparatus; and that
this same approach is useful in the reconfiguration of diseased
tissue of a human COBE.
Figure 12 is a representation of the mathematical model of
our Texas 2-step, or the particle-antiparticle pair in the matter
physical vacuum, the particle-antiparticle pair in the antimatter
physical vacuum, both of which are generated from the absolute
physical vacuum. This model, however, does not take into
consideration the electrodynamic and electrogravitodynamic
problems that arise when the vacuum bleeds into regular
spacetime in a variety of forms – or what Dyatlov and others
refer to as the VD. The general equation of electrogravito-
dynamics - or when the absolute physical vacuum or the matter-
or antimatter physical vacuum and matter are considered, the
vacuum-matter equations of combined electrogravidynamics

93
A. R. BORDON

with a non-homogeneous physical vacuum – are beyond the


scope of this book.

6.4. Vacuum-fed encoding of object matrices

Elsewhere, a definition of biogeosystemics was offered as a


stimulation to further thinking (90) that is worth repeating here.
The term biogeosystemics is the recognition and approach to the
study and consideration of energetics and processes involved in
the sustenance of the planet as host of life and of living forms on
its life belt as process beneficiaries and benefactors in a syntropy
that runs the gamut from simple energetic exchanges to a
profound autotrophism which benefits sufficiently evolved
specific life forms on the surface and in the oceans. Entropic
evolvement of living forms as well as the life of a living
oscillating biological entity is affected by dissipative structures
that affect their integrity and sustenance (91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96)
on Earth.

It is now known that weak, nonionizing and non-thermal


electromagnetic (EM) fields produce a wide variety of biological
effects at all levels of biological complexity – clinical, cellular
and biomolecular. Recent wide attention has also been given to
the role of endogenous or internal EM fields in self-integration
(89, 90, 91, 92, 94, 95, 97), or their role in the body’s remarkable
self-healing capabilities (90, 93, 95, 96, 97). Since the early
1990s (90), we have seen these local electromagnetic fields as
part of more fundamental and global bioenergetic fields inside
the body and emanating from the body at 90 degrees
perpendicular to all of its surfaces (Meissner field). Today,
energy medicine, an emerging field of study, these endogenous
fields are beginning to be recognized as regulators of
biochemical processes; moreover, it is also being recognized and
seriously considered that changes in the bioenergetic field comes
before any physical or chemical changes manifesting as disease.
Energy medicine then postulates that the early diagnosis and
treatment of disease defined in this manner can then be treated

94
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

by the normalization of a bioenergetic imbalance of a


bioenergetic field.
In 1975 (98) obtained preliminary evidence that certain
biomolecules behaved as superconductors, and bioenergetic
fields had a major function at a quantum level. There were others
who followed Cope. Frohlich, Popp and Smith in the decade of
the 80s and early 90s confirmed the results of (98), who
demonstrated that EM fields emanating from the body are
coherent in nature. Smith further demonstrated that the EM fields
in the body are quantized by demonstrating that biological
systems are sensitive to single magnetic flux quanta (99). This
finding was consistent with the superconductive properties of
biomolecules and indicated that biological systems are capable of
functioning at the quantum level as well as at the classical level.
In (90), we have established quite clearly that the body is a
quantum system that responds not only to potential fields even in
the absence of classical EM force fields, but to the action of
potential fields that does take place through quantum fields.
Potential fields are associated with magnetic vector
potentials (A) and electrostatic scalar potentials (φ). Classical
electromagnetic fields are derived from these potentials, so we
considered them as more fundamental. Quantum potential fields,
on the other hand, are avenues to subquantum energetics which
we now know lie at the basis of all energy and information.
Others (97) consider them to be merely a bridge between the
“higher order” quantum fields and the more familiar classical
EM fields.
Information in spacetime is said to be physical (100), (101),
as well as the object of a hypothesis postulated as a potential
“law” which basically states that if the total information of the
universe is conserved, black holes may well be ‘logic gates’
recomputing the ’lost information’ from incoming ‘signals’ from
outside their event horizons into outgoing ‘signals’ representing
evaporative or radiative decay ’products’ of the reconfiguration
process of the black hole quantum logic ‘gate’ (102). Apparently
any local imbalances in the information flow can be corrected by
including the effects of the coupling of the vacuum ’reservoir’ of
information as part of the total information involved in any

95
A. R. BORDON

evolutionary process. In this way perhaps the ’vacuum’


computes the future of the observable universe. But that’s not
where the influence of the vacuum as information source stops.
The vacuum can also provide energy and information to a
human COBE with full-scale observership capacities. A full-
scale observership human COBE is a person with a relatively
intact enteric nervous system and an average cellular capacitance
between 0.250 and 1.0 volt from multiple sites on the body –
upper and lower extremities, thoracic large muscle groups and
neck. It is this that has become the basis for what we have
baptized as the practice of sonobioelectrogravitic medicine, by
way of interventions and applications designed to extract, tap and
connect with vacuum infoenergetics for the purpose of restoring
functionality and optimal performance of the physical and
infoenergetic functions of a human COBE. In an earlier essay,
written in collaboration with others in the LPG-C labs teams, we
briefly reported on the treatment-application of a noninvasive
intervention via the internet with a patient of two of the authors.
The application is referred to as biogeosystemic
sonobioelectrogravitic restoration (BSR). The practice was also
popularly baptized as “cell talk healing template.”
The explanation of the nature of a mutual attraction of
physical bodies, in our opinion is one of the most important
results of the non-empty ether concept. The proposed concept of
the ethereal medium structure explains the nature of inertial
forces, and the reason for identical acceleration of bodies of
different mass in a gravitation field. Each physical body at rest
occupies certain space in the ethereal medium, displacing a part
of the netlike ether and distorting its structure. Without the
influence of gravitation masses, the vacuum-ether-plenum
medium will exert an equilateral pressure on this physical body.
If a physical body moves uniformly, the vacuum-ether-plenum
medium will flow around it. In the direction of the body's
motion, some mass of the ethereal medium will warp in front of
it. Behind the body, the same mass, with the same velocity as in
front of the body, will close. The momentum of masses will be
equal along the line of motion in front of the body and behind it.
As the medium has no ability to absorb or disperse energy,

96
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

uniform motion of such a physical body can continue forward


along its line of motion just about indefinitely.
During acceleration of a physical body motion, the
momentum of the mass in the ether medium in front and behind
it will differ. According to the second Newton law, to cause the
acceleration of a physical body it is necessary to apply force to it.
To cause the acceleration of a heavier body, it is necessary to
disconnect a much greater number of particles of the vacuum-
ether-plenum medium proportional to the mass of the physical
body along its line of motion. Thus, the acceleration of a body,
whether light or heavy, will be identical in the gravitation field of
the Earth. The absence of a vacuum-ether-plenum medium,
actively interacting with an accelerating mass, contravene
Newton's third law (action and reaction).
And here is something of eminent interest, however
historical the information may be. It is regarding the interaction
of an accelerating charge with the vacuum-ether-plenum
medium; this interaction enabled J. J. Larmor (102) to propose
the following hypothesis: since atoms consist of electron
systems, it may be proved that the inertia of ordinary heavy
matter could be explained by the excitation of self-inductance
currents during acceleration of the heavy body. Every electron,
as it accelerates together with the body, excites convection self-
inductance currents around itself. In this case, according to the
energy conservation law, some work should be done to produce
these currents (local magnetic field of self-inductance) and to set
the electron in motion (103). But this hypothesis was not
supported by the physicist of that time. In our opinion, the idea
of J. J. Larmor is fruitful and we should return to its development
and further testing. A physical body moving uniformly in the
ether medium does not meet resistance. As already stated earlier,
the ether medium resembles an ideal liquid by its properties, but
at the same time it has some distinctions of a specific solid body.
Now, our 4th gnosive finding allowed us to state that
manifestations which make vacuum-ether-plenum and space
display harmonic consonance in respect to each other as
templates of one to the other at a macro level relative to a human
observer are: electric charges; a matter conformation spectrum

97
A. R. BORDON

(from condensate/proto-matter to matter, both living and


nonliving or inert), within which there is also a mass formation
spectrum; a medium of manifest expression spectrum consisting
of wholly interconnected vacuum-ether-plenum to space, in a
container-inclusion relationship of former to latter expression;
and time as motion, the energetics of which are also the same
medium of manifest expression spectrum for electrical/magnetic
charges and fields. But what is time, and how does it manifest in
our local space?

6.5. Kozyrev’s Time as Subquantum Source of Energy


in Biological Systems Vacuum-fed Encoding of Object
Matrices

It won’t hurt to revisit Kozyrev's Time Theory to grasp and


understand the next issue in our discussion here. In his
discussion of structural analysis of his Time Theory, Kozyrev’s
idea of time as a revolving top that revolves around an axis is a
useful metaphor to understand certain processes seen by our
neurosensors. The revolution is said to be clockwise in cause and
counter-clockwise in effect. But this is an abstraction that is
better understood when examining the actual gnosive data from
physical events interfaced. Instead of cause and effect, let’s
substitute them with reduction and near-restoration of space in
the immediate medium in which time is affected. When a causal
agency or vector causes a reduction or seeming shrinking of
space immediately around the site upon which the cause acts,
space-time seems to roll up or shrink and unroll or expand back
to seeming previous size. The causal process is one of
absorption-expansion or release, all of which involves a decrease
of time density in the site and a subsequent expansion or
restoration of time density to near previous level. There is
motion involved, as stated above: clockwise in absorption and
counter-clockwise in expansion or restoration. But, in biological
systems, what is it that rotates?
To answer this question, the five neurosensors were tasked
with a single heuristic in late 2004. The results were quite
unexpected. Neurosensing data indicated that what revolves is

98
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

the protoplasm of cells as they change from gelatinous to soluble.


As protons flow across interstitial space between cells, creating
an inhomogeneous gravitic medium (not an electromagnetic
one), the rotation of internal cellular structures would become
vortex-like. Speed appeared correlated to level of relaxation.
Only much later we would learn that there were thresholds also
correlated to cell performance. There were two. One upon
completion of cells shifting phase completely to liquid state and
protoplasmic cellular capacitance increasing to what we referred
to first stage threshold, muscular relaxation levels of large
muscles and autonomic striate muscles would enter what we
defined as resonance capacitance stage.

Figure 13
Organismically, cells at start of resonance capacitance stage
would increase Meissner effect and therefore photonic activity in
what we call Meissner field. But, counterintuitively, as resonance
capacitance increased, instead of peaking outwardly, the
photonic field density would become compact and we would see
what could well be the antiMeissner field effect of the Meissner
field resonated away from the body. Interestingly, this is the
same exact process we have seen in the case of neurosensors
“powering up” to achieve merge with an avatar and a visual
point-of-view (POV). However, only one of those observed (five
subjects performing their own relaxation-cool down procedures)
reached Meissner-antiMeissner (MAM) resonance (or third

99
A. R. BORDON

stage), and only one other achieved resonance capacitance stage.


The one who did reach MAM resonance did so for less than five
seconds. As to cellular bioelectrogravitic behavior, a fairly
discernible pattern emerged as well. Table 1 below presents the
processes encountered in some detail.

TABLE 1 – Meissner effect, Meissner photonic field, stages of cellular


capacitance, and energetic effects by phase and stage.
______________________________________________________________
Stages Phase Events Cellular Field Time Causal
Behavior Manifestation Process

1. Baseline Normal Normal-stable Normal-chaotic plus ÅÆ minus


2. Enabling Relaxation Stable-to Meissner torsion plus↔minus
first stage field outward acceleration
capacitance beyond chaotic
3. Meissner Theta-Delta Second stage Meissner torsion +/- to low max
to MAM readi-
ness threshold
maximum
4. Meissner Delta stabilized MAM threshold Meissner field +/- to high IR
compact collapse to signal hand-
compact shake. Bearden
vacuum engine
formation.
5. Meissner Delta stable MAM stabilized Meissner field +/- bursts in
& solgel cell compact IR cone per each
revolution to cell – Bearden
threshold vacuum engine
______________________________________________________________

Energetic torsion fields appear off the human COBE bioform


at or around Stage 3 in Table 3. To a neurosensor, these fields
appear as one coherent one, spreading out from the mid-dorsal
section of the bioform. As neurosensors approach the body
surface, multiple red points appear on its surface. On or about the
Planck limit, neurosensors find miniversions of the single degree
of freedom field emanating from the human form.9 These
miniversions, on passing beyond the Planck limit, are cone
connectors of each cell to the vacuum-plenum! Now, we know
that torsion fields are generated by the classical spin or by the
spin angular momentum density at the macroscopic level of any
object – but the object has to be spinning to set up polarization in

100
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

two spatial cones, corresponding to a left torsion field and a right


torsion field. At an atomic and particle level, nuclear spin as well
as full atomic movements may well be the source of torsion
fields as well, which indicates that all objects in nature, whether
live or inert, produce their individual torsion fields.
What happens within these torsion fields at which levels?
What happens can be described and theorized depending
upon where the observer (a neurosensor) is located during the
event.
From below the Planck limit, it is possible to view what we
called the handshake between the cellular centriole’s infrared
signaling system and the vacuum response with either a positive
or negative stream of what we believe to be charged Bose-
Einstein condensates. From above the Planck limit, things got
very interesting. What follows is a sequence of events in the
form of a model of what we interpret to be the phenomenon we
(neurosensors) all saw.
When the handshake phenomenon is looked at closer from a
supra-Planck position, the first observation is that the cellular IR
handshake is not merely luminescent, but sonoluminescent
(sound frequency yet unknown). The solgel protoplasmic
medium is in seismic-like revolution, generating a mild torsion
field, creating a precesion-like phenomenon of the luminous field
emanation but with an interesting twist: the faster the revolution,
the more laser-like the centriolic light field. In the revolving
medium, changing from soluble to gelatinous in keeping with the
rhythmic sonoluminescent precesion, there were some interesting
chemical processes going on. At this time, we can only describe
a model of how things happened and a theory of what happened.
Here, let us refer you to (89), specifically to pages 50 through 53.
Once said, let us continue.
Imagine now a two dimensional quantum oscillator vibrating
near the zero point as Planck limit, as a result of Cooper pairing.
There is indeed an increase in electrostatic charge at the cellular
level, due mostly to the amplification of force set up by the
cytoprotoplasmic revolutions of each of the cell’s protoplasm.
This phenomenon seems to generate a distortion of normally
isotropic space, the amount of distortion being represented by the

101
A. R. BORDON

reflected internally constrained forces explicitly developed by


the protoplasmic rotation. Experimental results may not always
involve a gravity gradient, indicating discrete field phenomena.
But they may exploit time as subquantum energy.
There is also a strange possibility: as there are monoatomic
stable BEC (Bose-Einstein condensate) state of elements,
specifically 47-silver (and also quite possibly gold), there may
also be a detectable weight loss phenomenon similar to that
reported in homopolar inertial field phenomena reported by
Faraday, Pokletnov, DePalma, and others. It is also possible –
and something we are now looking at more closely – that the
presence of monoatomic stable BEC of such elements may
explain the reason for these BECs flip-flop between element
state and BEC state, as well as why the electrons rotate in a plane
perpendicular to the spin axis (much like in homopolar inertial
field phenomena). Thus, we hypothesize that the relative vector
force of electron flow may also follow the left hand rule,
allowing us to discern the direction of the flow, its ability to
burst flow, and to change polarities. Thus, we now have
powerful reasons to suspect that the electrostatic forces are being
driven by the friction between the nucleus and the boson quantal
field that is vibrating near the zero point and tapping the
time/subquantum to bring the cellular structure and its energy
capacitance into a kind of overunity condition that these m-state
elements represent and thus steady and/or burst pumping energy
into the system.10 Our feeling is that once the electron Cooper
pairs all achieve a more or less identical energy state, they tend
to congregate close to the nucleus with distance regulated by spin
rate inertial field changes. Double nuclei in the odd proton
transition element BEC's have a bigger nucleus, but perhaps not
a greater radius of quantal field potential by the addition of the
second set of bosons. As massless as photons are, they very well
might be under different constraints than the remaining nucleus
particles and no longer follow predicted solid matter behavior.
It has been hypothesized that electrons lose energy, but
restore the loss by slipping into the zero point to tap the
time/subquantum (23) (24). BEC's are mostly in space-time with
their converted electrons as bosons. The velocity of the radial

102
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

quantal disk theorized as rotating around the spinning nucleus


may play a part in the generating of the gravity excluding
Meissner field we see in solgel superconductors and a possible
mechanism in its generation. A possible, mild gravitational
attenuation in living systems along the spin axis may additionally
be involved in the quasi-bonding of the sodium atom rings
mentioned above.
The tuning of an atom to the Planck constant during Cooper
pairing forces it to vibrate near the zero point energy of the
time/subquantum, E0 = hf x ½, or the spectral energy density 'p'
of the zero point fluctuation as a function of that frequency, 'w',
such that p(w) = kw3 . Therefore, it would seem as though, under
certain conditions, human COBEs on Earth behave like
overunity systems.

6.6 An introduction to Torsion Fields, Organismic


Synchronization And The Process of Vacuum-fed
Encoding of Object Matrices by Biological Systems

In Figure 8, a human being surrounded by a double cardoid


field – two toroidal ones nested inside the other – faces forward
as the fields envelop him and an approximate 5 feet to either side
of the figure. A double cardoid field is the stuff of which the
Institute of HearthMath, in Boulder Creek, California, is known
for: the field produced by the human heart. Akimov describes
them out as three types of fields: E-fields (or
electric/electrostatic), S-fields (or spin), and G-fields (or gravity)
(87). These are so-called “subtle energy” fields, more properly
referred to as low-powered, low intensity ELF fields. It is known
now and understood that torsion fields are separate and distinct
from classical electric, magnetic, and gravity fields. Torsion field
generators can be shielded against electromagnetic fields and
torsion fields still manifest through such shielding (90). Torsion
fields can be generated, detected, switched on and off (such as
for communication purposes) and are presently used in various
versions of “bioelectronic telepathy,” and are a distinct type of
energy field heretofore not included in today's classical physics.
Torsion field emanations can travel at velocities at least as high

103
A. R. BORDON

as 120 times the speed of light (90) (104), by our estimates. But
that’s now where torsion field applications stop: they interact
with laser beams by changing its frequency or the laser’s
frequency; they can be made to affect biological processes; they
are generated by melting or solidifying certain types of materials;
they affect quartz crystals; we have made them affect some
electronic components; they have been reported can favorably
change some beverages (105); and they have been noted to affect
gravity (25) (93).
Akimov contends that torsion fields coupled to standard
electric, magnetic, and gravity fields should provide means for a
unified field theory that will extend the realm of science to
include the effects of consciousness (87), (88), (89), (96). It is
also interesting and highly suggestive that Akimov was director
of a KGB-financed research institution, the Center for
Nontraditional Technologies, a top secret research institute with
a healthy financial backing from both the Politburo and the then
Soviet Academy of Science. From discoveries by Semyon
Davidovich Kirlian and colleagues that the biophysical fields of
the body had potential weaponized applications, studies of these
biophysical fields led the Soviets then to its mapping and to their
use in a biophysical form of remote viewing – what we today
refer to as extension neurosensing (with additional and
substantial modifications in both technology, theory, and
application modeling).
Kirlian’s photographic discovery was a fortuitous accident,
in that it was a by-product of a project with a much different aim.
Krasnodar, in 1939, was a sleepy science town where new
energetics were being discovered. With hard evidence from
Kirlian photography and a wide variety of other electronic
scanners designed to study the body's biophysical field, including
biomagnetic, bioelectric and bioplasmic components, Soviet
physicists, biophysicists, medical personnel, and allied
researchers scattered in well over 50 research institutions by the
1950s, were given experimental data needed for a new physics of
what today is the subquantum. The results would not receive
modeling and theoretical sustenance until the implications of
Kozyrev’s time control theory were deciphered and understood.

104
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

However, this did not mean that the post-Kirlian applications


were orphaned and discarded because there was no theory
underlying them. Quite to the contrary, this merely compelled
more focused work.
The 75-200 khz electric fields used in Kirlian photography
provided important clues to the response of biophysical response
of human and other living tissue, describing and giving scientists
a handle on what to and how to generate sustainable Meissner
fields with antiMeissner field harmonics. But they did not go that
far, instead staying within the Meissner range of applications.
This, however, is not to say that off-the-book departments of the
KGB in secret labs in Siberia did not pursue MAM (Meissner-
antiMeissner) biophysical technologies, with surprising but
limited success. The limitations came from the level of available
technologies to generate and sustain avatar formation, viable
avatar-extension observer conjugations, and matter
synchronization of extension POVs. The alternatives were too
inhumane, although there is indicia that one information
compartment managed to achieve a most problematic results.
Not much information is available concerning it.
Meanwhile, Akimov and others (during and after
perestroika) began leaking out information about the existence of
“physical fields and particles” that had “profound effects” on the
human body. They had also elucidated the effect they exerted on
living and non-living organisms and inanimate objects. New
labels, like spinor, torsionic, and microleptonic, were used to
describe and define these new classes of physical fields. Western
scientists, who had limited appreciation and understanding of
these remarkable advances made by the Soviets called them
"scalar," fields. This was evident, in retrospect, by the take on
these development generated by key members of exotechnology
Soviet developments in the DIA, one of them in particular – then
Lt. Colonel Thomas E. Bearden. We are digressing obviously,
yet all of the preceding is important background to grasp the
importance and place of torsion fields in organismic
synchronization of matter on demand, and in the process of on-
demand vacuum-fed encoding of object matrices by human
complex oscillating biological entities. One of the areas

105
A. R. BORDON

seemingly left relatively untouched by Soviet Russian energetics,


bioenergetics, and psychoenergetics research was we now refer
to as LERM/VEEOM. We know from reports from a research
fellow in our northern California lab that the informant and
others like him performed biological VEEOM with human tissue
under field conditions. There was no information available on
results or rate of success
All organic and inorganic objects acquire spin fields: the
fields of rotation. As these fields are very weak in nature, they
are usually neglected in the analysis of physical systems.
However, it is possible to reinforce spin fields, by distorting the
plane geometry of a physical vacuum with a certain form. In this
case, spin fields can be registered with physical, chemical, and
biological indicators. Spin fields resemble gravitational fields in
their properties. For example, spin fields, cannot be screened
practically. They can expand on substantial distances with a
phenomenally small level of decay. It is considered that
generators based on these fields can affect biological systems on
the cellular-molecular level.

6.7 Do all roads lead inevitably to Rome? – Further


pieces of the puzzle.

Aleister Crowley’s Tarot Cards were said to be designed as


tools for reality manipulation. In the hands of a good practitioner,
magick, with a “k” at the end, was predicted to happen. What
appears to be little known and understood was that Crowley had
anchored much of his so-called magick on what here is being
referred to as vacuum-fed encoding of object- and reality-
matrices. Paul Hughes-Barlow, one of the most authoritative
scholar on Aleister Crowley’s Thoth Tarot Deck, in a July 2002
lecture at the Occulture Festival in England, described the
influences Crowley received from physicists and
mathematicians. The short list included Albert Einstein,
Bernhard Riemann, George Cantor, Bertrand Russell, George
Adams, and Rudolf Steiner. Riemann of course developed non-
euclidean geometry, which is at the heart of theoretical physics
and M-Theory. Riemannian geometry was used by Einstein in

106
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

his space-time ideas. Rudolf Steiner was a Theosophist who


founded Anthroposophy, and he developed his own non-
euclidean geometry - Projective Synthetic Geometry (PSG). A
most important proponent of PSG was George Adams, who was
a student of Bertrand Russell. Interestingly, Bertrand Russell
maintained relationships with both Crowley and Albert Einstein.
Georg Cantor, who was inspired by Kabbalistic texts, developed
Set Theory. Bertrand Russell famously solved a paradox
contained within Set Theory. The reader may be surprised to
know that Riemannian geometry is related to Cantor’s Set
Theory through the use of infinities. It also incorporates
Projective Synthetic Geometry into the Thoth tarot, it is clear
that Crowley saw the collection of 78 tarot cards in terms of Set
Theory
We knew Crowly’s real agenda was to the development a
kind of theory of consciousness on the basis of mathematical
topology. Through this avenue, he approached VEEOM by
stipulating that Tarot cards, each connected to another by a
projective synthetic geometry by building metashapes (or
templates), which Crowley considered to be the determining,
influential and decisive shaping of consciousness. In string
theory it is postulated that a superstring is actually two vibrating
ring of counter-rotating aspects, one clockwise-spinning in of 15
dimensions, another of 11 dimensions ‘spinning’ anticlockwise.
Interestingly, these add up to 26 dimensions.
To this we add Akimov’s and Russian findings on torsion
fields and torsionic solitons.12 The 26 dimensional superstring in
counter-rotating structuring, projects down a stream of torsionic
solitons shaped like a spiral with a ground state wavefront in
triplicate. This gives us 78 dimensional aspects in the torsionic
soliton stream of manifestation. And there are 78 tarot cards.
Isn’t that interesting? Now, the cards are reversible in direction,
which gives us the 78 reverse modes where the spiral ascends or
descends. Here, we have aware vectored intention (or AVI) enter
the picture. Or what is commonly referred to as consciousness.
Now, we have consciousness modality of dimensions of our
26 dimensional superstring conjugated to generate torsion fields
as they rotates. Superstring theory can be extended into the five

107
A. R. BORDON

theories (and the 11 dimensions of supergravity) that constitute


M-Theory. Akimov’s contention is that the four dimensions of
reality are constructed from five dimensional Riemann manifolds
by use of torsionic solitons, it is then not entirely surprising that
the five superstring theories link to the five dimensional plenum
of hyperspace into manifesting 4-space, and object matrices in 4-
space/time.
The only things missing from this picture are (1) the
enabling synchronization of hemispheric functions into
producing a sustainable visual point-of-view with which to
generate projective synthetic geometry metashapes in triplicate.
To this we couple our other missing piece: (2) the use of specific
sound sequences to provide an acoustic assembling final
template to achieve the matter-product. They will all be
conceptually assembled next.

108
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

7
VACUUM-ENERGETIC ENCODING OF
MATTER MATRICES –THING
OUT OF NO-THING ON
PURPOSE

IT IS WORTHY to repeat here that the biomind does not


cause an idiomaterial object to become synchronized into a
space-time ratio in which its manifest production observership
co-creates. At best, MSOD requires the biomind does act as
orchestrator of deterministic, subquantum variables, by the
dynamics of its ontobioenergetic interface with them that lead to
the product-moment of a thing becoming manifest from as no-
thing. This is then the single-degree of freedom sink that,
together, facilitate a sonobioelectrogravitic migration effect. And
viola! – the object of one’s desire.
For the remainder of this document, we will take a closer
look at the human side of matter synchronization on demand;
that is, we will go over what is necessary for a human COBE to
induce VEEOM on purpose. We popularly refer to as LEOM, or
light-encoding of object matrices.

7.1. From gonads to cranium: Symphonic ontobioener-


getic orchestra

We know and understand now that the energy referred to in


Hindu tantric traditions as Kundalini Shakti, the pure spiritual
energy that flows through a central nerve fiber or energy channel
within the spinal column, is a circuit of sonobioelectrogravitic
energy organismically drawn from the Earth and from the local
space-time vacuum-plenum of the body. The human body is said
to be networked by numerous such fibers, constituting a system
of “meridians” or nadis. These meridians interconnect the body
in ways that the central and autonomic nervous systems do not,
though all systems are integrated in their functioning (1). We
have strong gnosive and theoretical reasons to suspect that the

109
A. R. BORDON

informational and energetic interconnectivity buttressed by this


meridian network and the energy it conducts has a key role to
play in human-induced MSOD.
Kundalini is said to lie dormant in proximity to the coccygeal
gland (2). When awakened, it rises like a coiling double helix up
the spinal column up to the level of the forehead or above the
crown. The achievement of supernormal powers are attributed to
this awakening or rising of kundalini. Biophysically speaking,
the flow of sonobioelectrogravitic energy from the gonad region
to the cranium and back down creates an interesting field in the
thoracic region of the human COBE. This field is really a whole-
energetic plenum, or what Dyatlov's inhomogeneous vacuum
model would call a vacuum domain.
The human body organically expels a coherent, plasmoid-like
field of biophotonic light which produces a Meissner effect
occurring at perpendicular angles from any tissue surface. This
energy field is toroidal in form. A vacuum domain is also a torus
energy field, in the sense that it has a “hole” in its center as its
axis of rotation. Energy flows in a rotating spiral motion up this
pole, out the northern pole and back down to the southern pole.
We find interesting correlations between the bioelectrogravitic
toroid just described and the Kundalini energy of Hindu
Tantrism. The central polar axis is the spinal column, particularly
the so-called sushumna, pingala and ida nadis.
At a peak threshold moment, when the flow of SBEG energy
into the body as positive electromagnetic feed reaches overunity,
what becomes engaged is an energetic complex from roughly the
pelvis to the forehead. Specifically, we are speaking about the
cranial brain complex, the pituitary gland, the heart, the solar
plexi, and the gonads.
As humans native to the Gaian environment since our
appearance on Earth, we have become accustomed to its
rythmicities as both inner and ambient rhythms. It has been
reported that there are actually several other interlocking
resonating systems in the body activated by a steady 7 to 8 Hz
activity during low levels of activity, such as meditation (153).
The upper part of the body has a resonant frequency of about 7
Hz under normal conditions; additional resonance effects

110
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

resulting from this “phase interlock phenomenon” are not


unlikely. Biological systems have been shown to be
piezoelectric, semiconductive, and ferromagnetic in nature. It has
been reasonable to say that the existence of some intermediate
level between the internal and external environments in living
systems, which somehow processes and transmits signals, is in
fact real. It is the system and its environment being intimately
related, through charge and field effects and induced internal and
extra-4-space/time processes (which is what we here refer to as
sonobioelectrogravity), which is the real basis for the control
system sensitivities as its bioelectronics receive surrounding
signals – electromagnetic, sonoluminescent, and sonobioelectro-
gravitic. The need for creating a new area of science to study and
explain these phenomena has been most clearly recognized in
our little group, and we have pursued it.

7.2 What we now know and what we don’t yet fully


understand but grasp significance

In an idiomaterial universe, the concept of what a living


system is reaches beyond the confines of 4-space/time. In 4-
space/time, a living entity is capable of resonance and oscillation
because of water and counterions in the connective tissue
cytoskeletal system, and bioplasma (157). Progress in cell
biology has allowed scientists to see inside the cell, and their
structural and functional continuum. The cell, as we see it as
well, is the bioelectronic center of gravity of the living system's
living matrix. In the cell itself is the cytoskeletal system, attached
at the inner wall of the cell membrane to glycoproteins, which
extend through to the cell surface. The glycoproteins attach, in
turn, to elements of the extracellular ground substance matrix.
The ground substance matrix exists within the intervals of the
connective tissue fibers. These contiguous elements form the
building blocks for larger structures, including larger groups of
connective tissues. What a perfect conformation for
sonobioelectrogravitic (SBEG) migration!
The presence of fascia, i.e, connective tissue, is almost
universal throughout the body. It surrounds muscles, bones,

111
A. R. BORDON

organs, and nerve fibers. Soft tissues, in particular those


containing a great deal of collagen, elastin, or actin, are
bioviscoelastic solids, with some very interesting elastic
properties. To this we add semiconductivity, and the biomind's
ability to influence progress and timing of SBEG is complete.
We know this now, but we do not yet fully and clearly
understand the mechanics of migration, between the quantum-
potential and the biogenetic (or electromagnetic) templaic field
that supplies conformation to the living matrix (or 4D matrix) of
any living (or non-living) thing in 4-space/time.
More specifically:
(1) The success of a SBEG migration may have a great deal
to do with the organism's ability to oscillate and resonate with
the environment, including ambient EM emissions, as well as the
body-mind's ability to promote and guide the migration
consciously. How does this happen?
(2) Cell membranes and the cell itself maintain a high
electrical field potential and also high electrical capacitance
when fully functional and optimally functioning; cells can move
around and have “eyes” (as centrioles) that stir them toward
sources of infrared signals; cell intelligence is a factor in how the
bioelectronic subsystems of the inductor's living matrix
participates in generating SBEG energetics. How this
participation occurs is yet unclear; that it does, there is no doubt.
Do centrioles also have a role in signaling the subquantum? Are
centrioles part of the handshake?
(3) SBEG energetics is burst energetics; in other words, it
becomes available suddenly and its release is as if the energy is
pent up and the sudden burst appears intense. Here is where Ford
and Roman's quantum interest plays a key role. The positive
pulse that necessarily follows an initial negative pulse must do
more than compensate for the negative pulse; it must
overcompensate. The amount of overcompensation increases
with the time interval between the pulses. Therefore, the negative
and positive pulses can never be made to exactly cancel each
other. The positive energy must always dominate – an effect
known as quantum interest (45). If negative energy is thought of
as an energy loan, the loan must be repaid with interest. The

112
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

longer the loan period or the larger the loan amount, the greater
is the interest. Furthermore, the larger the loan, the smaller is the
maximum allowed loan period. Nature is a shrewd banker and
always calls in its debts (127). How does this work in LEOM?
(4) When dealing with radiant energy from discrete sources,
we can in general speak distinctly about an electromagnetic
effect, but in more detailed examination, its coupling with
gravitation (electrogravitional coupling or EGC) must be taken
into account. Gravitational process effects in discrete mass
systems, even in living ones, are a distinct category as well,
though EGC is always present in the effect. It is here, then, that
we must deal with Bearden's precursor engines (or what we call
cohorts) and the templates postulated by our Working Model.
EGC is then the Texas two-step referred to in (45), (14), (16) and
(17). How do they work as a whole?
(5) We also strongly suspect that infrared light plays a key
role in the cell's detection, decoding, transfer, and burst control
of SBEG energetics. And we also have reasons to believe that
each cell is its own collector, such then that the entire human
body-mind is actually riddled by collector points and collector
cones through which burst energetics may be phased into the
body as both negative and positive energies from the vacuum.
What are then the actual mechanics for all of this to happen?
(6) SBEG energetics may involve manipulation by the
inductor, consciously or unconsciously, of the bioelectronic
subsystems of his/her living matrix. The inductor is the source of
vector-intention in the system. We now have a much clearer idea
of the inductor’s role, but still there is work to do. And,
(7) SBEG energy bursting appears to be a special case and a
seemingly learnable capacity. It is now obvious to those of us
working with human-induced SBEG that it is a set of skills,
which can be learned, though it requires a knowledge set about
its physiology and biophysics. This, at least as of this writing, is
well understood and performed on demand.

113
A. R. BORDON

7.3 The emerging process model

Now, let me put together our conceptual model, so you may


see the logic and such a knowledge set as just mentioned, and
where the questions fit.
The workbench consists of fourteen elements.
1. Rheological Effects
Traditionally, the living cell is pictured as a membranous bag
containing liquid water with proteins and small cations in free
solution. Microscopically it does not resemble a bag of fluid, but
should be regarded as an organized semi-solid (a biorheological
structure) consisting of a matrix of water with embedded
macromolecules made complex with sodium and potassium ions.
This view of the cell was explained in detail by Hazlewood and
later verified through experimental research (160). We consider
the cell to resemble and act as somewhat of a solid, so that
cellular ion transport phenomena may be analyzed by the
methods of solid state, or perhaps, liquid crystal physics (162).
Transport processes are anisotropic in liquid crystals.
Perturbation of a transport process through a liquid crystalline
membrane was outlined in (161).
Therefore, we believe biorheological effects play a
substantial role in the cell acceptance of SBEG burst emission on
a cell-by-cell basis, though tissue appears to act with one degree
of freedom. Cells and intracellular elements are capable of
vibrating in a dynamic manner with complex harmonics, which
can be analyzed with Fourier analysis. Cellular events occur
within spatial and temporal harmonics and have potential
regulatory importance. Vibrational information can be
transferred through the cell. The connective tissue system acts as
a coupled harmonic oscillator, operating as a signal transducing
system from the cell periphery to the nucleus and ultimately to
the DNA. Does it? Do they? And how is it that these effects
participate in cell acceptance of SBEG burst emissions?
2. Bioviscoelasticity
The body is composed of bioviscoelastic fluids and solids.
The thermodynamics of elastic deformation of these components

114
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

have been addressed by Fung (163). In studies of inorganic


materials, some electromagneto-rheological devices (like braking
systems) have unique gel-to-sol-to-gel reactions when they are
acted on by an external force; we have reasons to believe that an
analogous situation exists in the living protein matrix comprising
the connective tissue matrix when affected by biological SBEG
emissions. The connective tissue part of the body's living matrix
appears to be the on-off switch. Is it?
3. Photon-Phonon Interconnectivity
Photons that are generated in layers of proteins can activate
chemical processes. Taken together with the drift of charges,
ions, radicals, etc. this photon emission forms the basis for
“bioplasma,” a central idea in a bioelectronic model of living
systems. In the bioelectronic body-mind of a human being, the
charge activated in a structural protein creates opportunities for
photon emission through several methods: fluorescence, electron
acceleration in an electrical field, temporary emergence of
paramagnetic centers and emissions as a result of spin relaxation.
What functions exactly are played out by photon and phonon
activity in the body-mind? And how does photon-phonon
interconnectivity play out in the mix leading to
sonobioelectrogravitic migration?
4. Biodynamic Interactions
Perhaps Sedlak said it best (203): biodynamic interactions
resulting in biological control should have the following
characteristics: “a) it should be instantaneous and generalized; it
cannot be a “diffusion” of information through the system, as
that would work too slowly; b) capable of receiving every type of
information from the environment (electromagnetic, acoustic,
thermal, chemical, mechanical, gravitational); c) able to receive
selectively the same information over different biological orders
of magnitude; d) it must incorporate parts of the organism and
the whole at the same time; e) an excess of information must
trigger a “switch-off” in the organism; f) it must experience
minimal loss and distortion, and therefore insure maximum
fidelity of transmission.” How do any of them promote or hinder

115
A. R. BORDON

sonobioelectrogravitic migration? Can the human operator


positively affect or change the obstacles to migration?
5. Wave Dynamics
Wave motion, in order to be effectively distributed throughout
the body, must also be “directed.” A surface level electron
concentration appears at various levels of plant and animal
organization, forming a directing “layer.” Surface potentials exist
not only in microorganisms but also in individual cells of tissue
systems. Seldak referred to this phenomenon as electrostasis,
parallel to a kind of electrical homeostasis. The transfer of
information can occur as direct transfer of frequency-specific
energy through harmonic wave motions. Wave propagation
along a tensor can pass information through the amplitude,
frequency, and phase of the wave propagating along it. The
amount of information that a tensor system can pass is equal to
the width of the frequency of the waves of information and the
total time they are available for interpretation. The human body
is able, due to electrostasis, to separate each component of this
radiation according to the body's anatomic makeup and need, and
absorb the bands in the spectrum specific to that wavelength or
frequency. Thus, wave dynamics can and, in our opinion, plays a
role in the propagation of information along the tensor system
such that tissue in need of SBEG energetic burst emission may
coordinate need with the critical function of the human operator
(provided the operator is sufficiently sophisticated and aware of
his/her body and of its maintenance requirements). Through
frequency-specific tissue needs messaged throughout the
organism, the human biomind as operator can then be able to
coordinate and direct the needed SBEG burst emission as
necessary.
6. Helical Structures
Another phenomenon is the formation and existence of
helical waves. If bioplasma exists, it is quite possible that
“pinch” phenomena occurred which caused a helical geometry to
manifest – in the same way that “pinch” affects superheated
gases magnetohydronamically. In addition, nucleic acids and
their protein complexes are systems of strongly coupled spins.

116
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

7. Redox Processes
If one accepts the idea of the temporary increase of
paramagnetic centers in a diamagnetic medium, what may exist
in a biological system is a magnetic analogy with an electronic
state which can be described by an oxidative-reductive (redox)
potential or magnetic “donor – acceptor” state. In such a
description, diamagnetic to paramagnetic transitions can be
expressed as magnetic redox reactions. The analogy with redox
processes may be further substantiated by the existence of charge
transport between paramagnetic centers and diamagnetic
molecules. Equally important is the subsistence of a level of
diamagnetism (i.e. spin = 0 state) as a general background for
“dia-par” processes. Most likely, the enzymatic decay of organic
compounds serves a similar purpose in that the decay products
are always diamagnetic.
8. Magnetohydrodynamic Biological Control
The action of magnetic fields affects the magnetic states of
organic molecules, conditioned by quantum-electronic processes.
There presumably exists some fundamental magnetic state of a
living organism which is disrupted by the action of external
factors. Semiconducting organic matter constitutes a diamagnetic
“solvent” for paramagnetic components. These may thus form a
paramagnetic “colloid” within a diamagnetic medium. Such a
“colloidal” state is an essential condition. The activated particles
must form an actual or colloidal solution, while preserving their
paramagnetic properties. The medium consists of diamagnetic
water, as well as saccharides, lipids and protein. A biological
system may be in general understood as a diamagnetic medium
with distributed paramagnetic centers. It may prove useful to
treat biological electronic states as a physical plasma.
Enrichment with a paramagnetic component was in the interest
of the plasma processes of life. Anisotropic biological structures
form a kind of guideway for plasmic processes. In some
situations, such as in nucleic acids, they may direct electronic
processes towards cyclotron motion – along helical trajectories.
Helical waves in plasma produce a strong axial magnetic field.
This is all the more true in the case of DNA, as one finds within

117
A. R. BORDON

the structure ferromagnetic iron atoms – which may serve the


purpose of amplifying this field; also stressed is the possibility of
ferromagnetic to anti-ferromagnetic transitions. DNA molecules
may constitute paramagnetic media of variable magnetic
susceptibility. What therefore exists in a biological system is a
magnetic situation which displays an analogy with an electronic
state described by an oxido-reductive potential. One may speak
of “donor” or “acceptor” states of a magnetic field. Plasma
indeed repels magnetic field lines (or is itself repelled by them),
or “freezes” field lines within itself. Within such a description,
diamagnetic and paramagnetic transitions are reminiscent of
“magnetically” expressed redox reactions. Is
sonobioelectrogravitic burst emission a redox reaction? Does the
cell set up an acceptor state using a magnetic field generated at
the DNA level, such that the helical waves in cyclotron motion
may be the ones responsible for producing the magnetic field?
9. Bioresonance
The bases for oscillation and bioresonance is biophysical.
The bioelectro-dynamics of the connective tissue cytoskeleton
matrix and the related hydrogen bonds in surrounding water, as
well as the electro-mechanical physical properties of the proteins
themselves we now know results in whole-body collective
oscillations. These, in turn, may be derived from the energy of
higher frequency Frohlich oscillations.
Such oscillations may directly involve hydrogen bonds.
Bistolfi reports (164) that the frequency of the oscillating
phenomenon related to biological hydrogen bonds appears to
remain limited to the infrared frequency band, from near inrared
(10-6 wavelength, 1014 Hz) to far infrared almost to in the
microwave region (10-4 wavelength, 1011 Hz). He maintains that
one can consider DNA and protein hydrogen bonds as centers of
EM radiation emission in the range going from the millimeter
waves to the far infrared. Low frequency harmonic pulsations
may be the result of the interaction of the Schumann resonances
with such signals, the resulting waves in turn generating a
stronger oscillation within the connective tissues of the body.
The result of this activity may be measurable as a biofield, and

118
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

may represent a form of biomagnetic emission consisting of


relatively stable, coherent, measurable vibrations. We have now
strong reasons to believe that DNA and protein bonds have
significant roles in establishing connection with what we believe
to be naturally occurring “feeder cones,” through which burst
emission are funneled to a cell. How this occurs is still a minor
mystery.
10. Dia- & Paramagnetism
It is known that biomembranes maintain fields on the order
of 105 V/cm, a field in which ordinary materials would break
down electrically unless special care were taken. Molecules
subjected to such fields will, in general, exhibit non-linear
reactions such as change of structure.
Bentov pointed out that charged particles produced by the
sun residing in the Van Allen belts oscillate back and forth along
the magnetic lines of the earth between the north and south poles.
Much of this vibration is in the frequency range of 1 to 40 Hz,
well within physiological frequencies (153). These oscillations
are coupled with the changes in the earth's magnetic field. The
spectrum of the earth ionosphere cavity resonance, the Schumann
resonance, covers the 1 Hz to 30 Hz region with an average value
of about 7.8 Hz. This coincides with the brain's alpha rhythm
typically about 8 Hz. Also, numerous reports have demonstrated
the extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields, or
radiofrequency field amplitude modulated at ELF, can alter the
efflux of calcium ions from CNS-derived samples. Three
research groups have shown that a range of frequency between 6
and 20 Hz was effective, while frequencies below and above that
range were ineffective (154). Not only brain waves, but other
systems also are affected by the Schumann resonance. As quoted
in Smith (152), in 1987 Erwin Ludwig measured and compared a
large number of the ELF rhythms in human subjects with
resonant frequencies in homeopathic remedies using spectrum
analyzer.
Bentov reported that Schumann calculated the earth-
ionosphere cavity resonance frequencies at 10.6, 18.3, and 25.9
Hz, and he reported more recently values calculated by Toomey

119
A. R. BORDON

and Polk at 7.8, 1.1, 20.3, 26.4, and 32.5 Hzs. Ludwid found a
number of frequencies have been found to be common to all the
subjects and to relate to the specific physiological functions. For
example, the frequency 0.1 Hz relates to the circulatory system,
7.8 Hz relates to the hippocampus, 10 Hz to the circadian
rhythms, 33 Hz to the lymphatic system, etc.
Extraordinary dielectric properties arise from the high
electric fields maintained in membranes. When taken in
conjunction with the biomembrane's sensitivity to very low weak
electric fields, these properties play an important role in
resonance interactions between molecules. For example, amino
acids, proteins and nucleic acids, porphyrins such as chlorophyll
and carotenoids are semiconductive. A quantum of light entering
a semiconductive protein structure results in photoexcitation
causing charge transfer or excitation “hopping,” and sometimes,
emission of photons. The charge activated in a structural protein
creates opportunities for photon emission through several
methods: fluorescence, electron acceleration in an electrical field,
temporary emergence of paramagnetic centers and emission as a
result of spin relaxation. Electromagnetic waves can be guided
and simultaneously slowed down by appropriate semiconducting
and dielectric structures. The nature of the interaction of
electrons with the electrical component of the electromagnetic
wave is very important, especially in electric fields having a high
frequency wave. Structures which slow EM waves are known as
“decelerating systems.” Dia- and paramagnetism are also
connected to bioplasma. Its exceptional selectivity and
responsiveness, through alteration of its own state, make plasma
the ideal carrier system of information within living organisms.
This sort of plasma is basically diamagnetic; there are however
many factors which may locally produce paramagnetism.
Experimental attempts to prove the reality of bioplasma have
been underway in Russian since 1968. Magnetic fluctuation and
the concomitant emission of weak radiation are only different
pictures of the same plasma discontinuity. Paramagnetic centers
are quantum-mechanically “mobile,” and vary according to the
general magnetic state of the system and radiation. As a result
there would be both plasma pulsations between paramagnetic

120
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

and diamagnetic components, and spin pulsations within organic


diamagnetics and paramagnetics (otherwise known as spin
waves).
11. Semiconductivity
The presence of fascia, a form of connective tissue, is almost
universal throughout the body. It surrounds muscles, bones,
organs and nerve fibers. Soft tissues, in particular those
containing a great deal of collagen, elastin, or actin, are
considered bioviscoelastic solids, with some very interesting
elastic properties. Also, many of these proteins are
semiconductive. The entire organism should be considered as
one structure with respect to its capacity for wave and oscillatory
phenomena, although it is obviously not homogenous. Coupled
to wave dynamics, semiconductive proteins constitute the
primary means by which the body-mind gains information about
its status and state. Without it, SBEG burst emission needs would
not be possible to establish and to communicate them to the
critical functions of the human operator.
12. Proteinaceous Oscillators
Let me repeat here what I have already said elsewhere in this
book and elsewhere: the ground substancfe surrounding a cell
forms a basic matrix in multicellular organisms, called the
extracellular matrix. This matrix has a significant effect on a
cells ability to express its genetic constituency and maintain a
healthy quality. The interactive nature of the extracellular matrix
with the connective and supporting tissues and blood is
extremely important. Nerves and vessels do not come into direct
contact with the functioning cells at any point in the body; the
connective tissue via the extracellular matrix is really the
mediating member. It transports nerve and nutrition flow and
reciprocal effects from the nerves pass through it everywhere.
The condition of this medium (such as its degree of hydration
and toxicity) may have a bearing on the ability of the whole body
to structure to oscillate. It is easy to conceive of such an aqueous
proteinaceous environment as a type of forward-biased p-n
semiconductor, transmitting signals in a regulated fashion to
surrounding cells, influencing the metabolic pathways. Each cell

121
A. R. BORDON

has a very thin layer of ordered water extended over at least 3


nanometers from the billions of square nanometers of solid state
surfaces. This water can be coupled to the coherent dynamics of
the protein solid state, enabling the protein filaments to carry
signals. The compound molecules that are electrically neutral,
but carry charges of opposite sign at their ends – these are
dipoles. The connective tissue system is functionally continuous;
thus, large scale information pathways may use such filaments as
signal transmitters. Now, having said all of that, let me put
proteinaceous oscillators in the perspective needed to understand
their role in any future model. Proteinaceous oscillators lined by
water are perfect channels for multilevel biocommunication,
including the disposition of positive energetics following a
negative energy burst.
13. Bioelectronic Processes
The connective tissue system matrix is a quasi-crystalline
structure consisting of semiconductive piezoelectric proteins and
associated biochemical metabolic pathways. Evolution may have
determined the course of embryogenesis (i.e., the development of
the nervous system, circulatory system, etc.) and outlined this
course within the connective tissues of the body along
predetermined lines of force caused by exposure to electric
and/or magnetic fields. The field lines act as a blueprint and are
determined by long-term evolutionary exposure of this matrix to
EM radiation in the environment. Specific molecular channels
could exist within the structure of the matrix to conduct
bioelectromagnetic signals. If the biomind's body structure's
living matrix was not quasi-crystalline semiconductive
piezoelectric proteins, it is our considered view that SBEG
energetics would not be possible in the human COBE's physical
body.
14. Sonoluminescence
Sonoluminescence is the emission of light by bubbles in a
liquid excited by sound. It was first discovered by scientists at
the University of Cologne in 1934, but was not considered very
interesting at the time. In recent years, a number of researchers
have sought to understand this phenomenon in more detail. A

122
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

major breakthrough occurred when Gaitan et al. Were able to


produce single-bubble sonoluminescence, in which a single
bubble, trapped in a standing acoustic wave, emits light with
each pulsation. Before this development, research was hampered
by the instability and short lifetime of the phenomenon. The
mystery of how a low-energy-density sound wave can
concentrate enough energy in a small enough volume to cause
the emission of light is still unsolved in the physics community.
It requires a concentration of energy by about a factor of one
trillion. To make matters more complicated, the wavelength of
the emitted light is very short – the spectrum extends well into
the ultraviolet. Shorter wavelength light has higher energy, and
the observed spectrum of emitted light seems to indicate a
temperature in the bubble of at least 10,000 degrees Celsius, and
possible a temperature in excess of one million degrees Celsius.
Such a high temperature makes the study of sonoluminescence
especially interesting for the possibility that it might be a means
to achieve thermonuclear fusion. If the bubble is hot enough, and
the pressures in it high enough, fusion reactions like those that
occur in the Sun could be produced within these tiny bubbles
(178) (179).
The light flashes from the bubbles are extremely short – less
than 12 picoseconds (trillionths of a second) long (180). The
bubbles are very small when they emit the light – about 1
micrometer (thousands of a millimeter) in diameter. Single-
bubble sonoluminescence pulses can have very stable periods
and positions. In fact, the frequency of light flashes can be more
stable than the rated frequency stability of the oscillator making
the sound waves driving them. For unknown reasons, the
addition of a small amount of noble gas (such as helium, argon,
or xenon) to the gas in the bubble increases the intensity of the
emitted light dramatically (181).
A proposed explanation, made earlier (1999) by physicist
Claudia Eberlein of the University of Cambridge, involves an
excursion into quantum mechanics. It states that empty space is
not empty at all, but is made up of fluctuating fields that pop in
and out of existence. These fleeting fields can be considered
“virtual particles,” short lived particles that are not ordinarily

123
A. R. BORDON

detected. But adding a tremendous amount of energy can drag


these virtual particles into the observable world. Drawing upon
ideas proposed by the late physicist Julian Schwinger, Eberlein
theorized that a bubble – or more precisely the boundary layer
between the bubble and the surrounding water – moving through
a space of atomic dimension in trillionths of a second can
provide the extreme conditions necessary to make the virtual
light into the real light which is observed as sonoluminescence.
We considered this theory highly speculative early on, but after
some skunk work theorizing, drawing from several disciplines,
we came around to Eberlein's point of view. I'll explain as we
move forward.
The two main possible theories behind sonoluminescence are
proposed by Claudia Eberlein and Andrea Properetti. Eberlein's
theory is a kind of sonic blackhole and Hawking radiation theory
or Unruh effect. However, people dismiss this theory because the
light emission should only depend on the properties of the
vacuum and the interface movement, but addition of inert gases
changes the properties of the light. Properetti believes that the
light is generated as a jet of liquid shoots from one side of the
bubble to the other at very high speed (around 6,000 km/h).
Properetti believes that an introduction of noble gases changes
the way the water molecules align themselves, creating flaws in
the crystal-like structure that enhance the fracturing effect. Enter
Bose-Einstein condensates or BECs.
In quantum mechanics, an individual particle is represented
by a wave that has both amplitude and phase. The most
remarkable consequence of Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC)
of a vast number of particles is that macroscopic properties
become dependent on a single wavefunction, promoting quantum
physics to classical time-and-length scales. A BEC is a highly
ordered state in which the wavefunction phase is coherent over
distances much longer than the separation between individual
particles. Long-range quantum phase coherence has many
dramatic physical consequences, of which the most spectacular is
superfluidity, that is, the ability of matter to flow around
obstacles with extremely weak, often immeasurable, dissipation.

124
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

All knowns BECs are formed by particles that are actually


composite bosons made up of an even number of fermions.
Helium-4 atoms, for example, contain two protons, two neutrons
and two electrons, and Bose condense to form a superfluid at just
a few degrees above absolute zero. Today there is intense interest
in BECs in rarefied atomic vapors. But the story changes with
superconductive liquid matrices that behave as they do in human
COBE biominds.
In superconductors electrons form pairs at low temperatures.
These Cooper pairs are again composite bosons. In this case, the
formation of pairs and their collective Bose condensation usually
occur at the same low temperature; the transition temperature is
controlled by the underlying fermionic physics, not purely by
bosonic quantum mechanics. Correspondingly, the average
separate between electrons in a given Cooper pair usually greatly
exceeds the mean distance between pairs.
An exciton in a semiconductor consists of an electron bound
to a hole. In most cases the electron is in the conduction band of
the semiconductor, and the hole, which is nothing more than an
unfilled electronic state masquerading as a positively charged
object, is in the valence band. Excitons are usually created by
shining light on the semiconductor, which creates electrons and
holes in equal numbers. Optically generated excitons like these
are ephemeral objects, decaying quickly via the emission of light.
An exciton is then the particle-like entity that forms when an
electron is bound to a positively charged “hole.” An ordered
electronic state in which excitons condense into a single qunatum
state was proposed as a theoretical possibility many years ago.
Studies of semiconductor bilayer systems (182) (183) provide
clear evidence for this phenomenon and explain why exciton
condensation in the quantum Hall regime, where these
experiments were performed, is as likely to occur in electron-
electron bilayers as in electron-hole bilayers. In current quantum
Hall excitonic condensates, disorder induces mobile vortices that
flow in response to a supercurrent and limit the extremely large
bilayer counterflow conductivity (184) (185) (186).
Although all of these studies concern sonoluminescence in
inorganic systems, this is precisely what neurosensors in our

125
A. R. BORDON

group see happening in our n = 1 experiments with organic,


human biominds: the hole, in this case, is not an unfilled
electronic state but rather one end of a feeder cone that
illuminates its way with infrared light to connect with a cell
which responds to its signal. The interesting thing we've been
seeing is that when the operator/study participant uses a cool
down technique to induce the needed psychophysiology, it
generates a photonic field that superposes the biological mass
from which it comes (in the 1100nm range, or intense white
light). It is light then that shines on the semiconducting tissue,
which then creates electrons and a hole from which excitons
come and become Cooper pairs – in other words, positive
energy. If the operator's vector-intention is to bathe-illuminate
tissue in light for a specific area of the body, this will be done as
if by some magic mandate.
The sonic range was Ra-translated (i.e., sound frequencies
expressed in Ra frequencies; see previous chapter) and a
bonephone sound delivery system was using to deliver sound
directly into the tissue by bone conduction resonance.

7.4 Internal stereoscopic visual point-of-view as a


holographic information matrix

VEEOM is similar in dynamics to the way laser holography


works. To produce a three-dimensional hologram, coherent light
is refracted off the desired object and recorded upon a
holographic plate, with another source of coherent light
illumining the plate without refracting off an object. This record
is an interference pattern produced by the light's reflection.
Lastly, a third coherent light beam shines upon the plate, and the
3D image of the object, such as an apple, manifests behind it as if
by magic.
One of the lessons that idiomateriality has forced us to learn
and accept is that physicality and even shared reality is a
hologramic experience concocted by our senses. A concrete wall
is not “solid” in the way I experience its solidity based upon
what my sense of touch hologramically renders for me; nor do
any of the objects I visually perceive really look as I experience

126
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

them to visually appear as based upon what my sense of vision


hologramically renders. The index ratio of 4-space/time upon
Earth that we appear to live in is a world that is manifest to us
through its interface with our senses; thus, our experience of it is
represented, not direct.

7.5. Importance of high-fidelity self-same visual-


sensorial reproduction

Objects as idiophysical processes are records of interference


between time, as subquantum energy inflow, and unisonic
bitemplaic resonance. The object's 4-space/time template is
electromagnetic and one side of the templaic coin, with the other
being the object's scalar or vacuum electromagnetic template
extant beyond the Planck boundary. The Texas 2-step mentioned
earlier is much like a quantum dance between these two
bandwidths, and the rate of this dance defines the flow of time as
space-perturbing energy.
By visual point of view, we are referring to an extremely
high-fidelity visual perception of the object desired, beheld in the
mind's eye within a projective, three dimensional space. To be
clear, the induced visual perception of the object must not simply
be photographic, but actually holographic. The operator
intending to produce the object must have a clear and
unwavering vision of the object as if physically beholding it with
his/her physical eyes, though they are closed. All of this must be
done with no conscious effort involved.
The vision beheld in the operator's eye provides the
hologramic information of the desired target to the vacuum and
to time – that is, time as the manifestation of subquantum
energies perturbing space. Allow me to take another moment in
review of Dr. Kozyrev's work with causal mechanics. He
postulated that time had more active properties beyond the mere
characteristic of duration, and discovered, among other things,
that asymmetrical processes occurring over time upon material
systems (such as the steady increase of entropy in a closed
system) have resonant effects upon other nearby asymmetrical
processes and, thereby, upon nearby material systems. This

127
A. R. BORDON

resonant transfer appeared to take place through a medium not


observable by instrumentation. We now know this medium to be
the so-called vacuum or ether, and the resonant effects to be a
result of constructive and de-constructive gravitational-inertial
interference.
Human-induced matter synchronization is a manifestation of
the human COBE's gravitational-inertial interference capacity.
The biomind's biomass structures the infolded electromagnetism
inside potentials and fields. As biomind cytocapacitance (or
cellular capacitance) and vacuum superconductivity increases,
the local space/time surrounding the body becomes unstable and
begins to curve, violating the Lorentz invariance of the vacuum
and causing gravitational-inertial resonance effects upon all
manifest electromagnetism in the presence of a growing weak
field (or vacuum domain) in which scalar-to-pseudoscalar field
translation becomes translation between that which is virtual and
that which is observable already. In other words, matter (or
material-process) synchronization.
Simply put, the more accurate the “recall” of the object to be
synchronized, the more accurate the synchronized object will be
in 4-space/time. The holographic reproduction of the desired
product within the mind's eye prompts the biomind to
“recognize” what it wants, and this is a resonant harmonic event
that is much like an informatic handshake or entanglement
between the target's quantum potential template, which is the
really the “memory” of the object that the vacuum stores, and the
operator's integrated cortico-enteroneuromyofascial network.
The vision beheld in the mental space, therefore, provides the
templaic wave-guide as the form-architecture for the
sonobioelectrogravitic “kundalini” burst to which to conform.

7.6. Duality out the door: a necessary psycho-


physiological configuration

Another way of saying that a dualistic state of mind is


anathema to LEOM on demand is to say that the opposite is true
and necessary: the psychophysiology of the human operator has
to be single degree of freedom across all time-space and space-

128
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

time regimes of all his or her cells. We had, since 1995, learned
that subquantum vacuum domains, which are local formations of
a non-homogeneous physical vacuum, are transformers of
gravitational energy into electromagnetic energy and the reverse
and of both these types of energy into mechanical and thermal
energy. This grasp and understanding facilitated a host of
interrelated phenomena production, some with quite dramatic
effects, while others were curiosities appearing as seeming
coincidences. More specifically, we refer to MPO (manifest
production observership) effects, and human-precipitated
VEEOM (vacuum energetic encoding of object matrices)
phenomena on demand.
Information in spacetime is said to be physical. The vacuum
can also provide energy and information to a human COBE with
full-scale observership capacities. A full-scale observership
human COBE is a person with a relatively intact enteric nervous
system, an average cellular capacitance between 0.250 and 1.8
volt from multiple sites on the body – upper and lower
extremities, thoracic large muscle groups and neck, and a
working myofascial complex (i.e., a network of supportive, and
highly conductive tissue that covers and is networked to the rest
of the body). Observership is a critical function of all living
biological entities. Thus, the body and mind, working together as
what here we have chosen to refer to as the biomind, function in
a critical mode every second of every minute of every hour of
every day of every year, from birth to death. This critical mode
involves two specific functions we have here lumped together for
the sake of explication, but which in life and living are very
specific to the biomind’s overall performance. One is interaction
(with all living entities on the planet and with the living
environment); the other is interface (purposeful connectivity by
specific choice, with other humans as well as other COBE life
forms on Earth and in the universe).

7.7. The requisite of internal holonomic peace

Internal holonomic peace is a relative misnomer, since there


is mental activity during the period involving alignment of

129
A. R. BORDON

processes performed mentally by the human operator. However,


mental performance of these processes should not hinder and
prevent the maintenance of a specific brain activity pattern,
described in (118) as alpha (frontally), delta (parietally), and
theta (occipitally). As described in (118), the operator’s internal
holonomy (experience of the internal environment as mental
equivalents of physical objects and processes) requires that
he/she perform several mental processes additively, one followed
by another and another until all processes are inserted into the
requisite resulting psychophysiologic environment. It is the
overall mark of this environment which we refer to here as
internal holonomic peace.

7.8. Biomind as bicausative vector: upward meets


downward

We have often been asked if this is a case of “as above, so


below.” It is not, and it is not intended to come across as such.
What it does mean is that a biomind in the world is a causal
vector and an agent of causation. A relative relationship then
exists between a causal agent, such as a human COBE biomind
on Earth and the T-boundary: this relationship is known to us as
tautologic refractivity – the T-boundary’s ability to experience
(i.e., receive and process information from each and every single
LRIS or living relatively independent subtotality) in the form of
overfunctions of nodal memberships. An overfunction would be
the sum total of members of a COBE biokind. A nodal member
would be the single or individual constituent of an overfunction.
This overfunction is also known as a hub.
The Working Model that continues to emerge from the
gnosive work done by LPG-C tells a unique story in the form of
a theory in which causality is bilateral – that is, there is upward
as well as downward causal chains initiated and promoted by two
general classes of causal agencies; one is the T-boundary (or
Though-boundary), the energetic source from which thought-
essences as protomatter matrices and protomatter as prephotonic
angular momenta constitute a veritable infinite ocean of
idiomaterial energetics. The other is an observership agency

130
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

represented by entropic influence of Life (as life forms) in the 4-


spacetime universe as we know it. The latter involves mega-
actions initiated by life forms, anything from galactic
engineering to planetary match-ensemble of life belts suitable for
planets incapable of sustaining life at a given time-progression in
the star system’s time production/consumption. What is now
referred to as terra-forming is but an early, albeit relatively
primitive intervention for making lifeless planets livable for any
kind of simple and complex oscillating biological life.

Interestingly, the Working Model requires that all living


forms have a hub, as it indicates that each form ‘manages’ its
own biology as well as intersects with the environment in a such
a way that its reality is conformed according to its sensorial
apparata, local conditions, and life requirements. Sensorial
apparata change as well according to need, in a predictable
progression we (human COBEs) can understand. This applies
from unicellular entities all the way to mammals.

131
A. R. BORDON

7.9. Assemblage – Thought and vacuum condensates by an


act of will and the sound of creation

Assembling activities leading to assemblage by thought and


sound is now at the level of a biomind – a mind in a human body
coupled and conjugate to act in a single degree of freedom. To
do so requires that the human COBE (complex oscillating
biological entity) possess the necessary knowledge and
algorithmic patterns internally (in biomind) to engage mind and
body cells to produce the final sequence of assemblage. To
understand how things work, we need to take a broader look at
things.
Let’s begin with the central nervous system (CNS) and the
hemispheric working frequency ranges that are associated with
gnosive experiences, and biophysical effects from enhanced
cellular capacitance.

The CNS and enabling psychophysiologies

Dr. Rodolfo Llinas, New York University School of


Medicine, postulates that
consciousness has to do
with timing, and the
thalamus - rather than
being a mere relay station -
also functions as the brain's
clock. Using an instrument
called a magneto-
encephalograph, or MEG-
a technology Llinas helped
develop - he has been
studying the brain's electro-
magnetic waves. What he has found in broad paraphrase is that
the thalamus is in constant dialogue with the brain's higher
processing centers: An electromagnetic loop sends pulses from
the thalamus to the cortex, but the different sensory centers of the
brain also message the thalamus in return. Consciousness exists
when these oscillations are in sync-pulsing at the same rate--so

132
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

smells, sounds, and so forth assemble in a kind of


electromagnetic symphony. It is a model that provides a number
of useful applications for us – one that also couples very well to
the use of electromagnetic energy to produce effects in the brain
– some beneficial and others quite manipulative and not in the
interest of a human being.13
Dr. Llinas’ work in thalamocortical dysrhythmia (TCD) is a
theory that is currently used to explain the positive and negative
symptoms induced by neurological disorders (Parkinson's
Disease, neurogenic pain, Tinnitus, Epilepsy) as well as
neuropsychiatric disorders (depression). In TCD the intricate
dynamics between thalamus and cerebral cortex are disrupted by
changes in the behaviour of neurons in the thalamus. At the base
of the theory lies diminished excitatory or increased inhibitory
input at the thalamic level. This leads to a switch of the
thalamocortical neurons from tonic to burst firing and
subsequently entrains thalamic and cortical areas with
pathological oscillations at around 5Hz. TCF evidence comes
from Magnetoencephalography or MEG, and
Electroencephalography (EEG) recordings on the scalp as well as
local field potential (LFP) recordings in the patients' thalamus
during surgery. Analyzing the power spectra reveals increased
coherence as well as increased bicoherence in the power spectra
in the theta band compared to healthy controls. This indicates a
close coupling of cortex and thalamus in the generation of the
pathological theta rhythmicity. A noninvasive therapy used in
conjunction with Parkinson’s disease is a neurotechnique we
have adopted for use in extension neuro-sensing, as well as in the
production of VEEOM. Neurofeedback, where the brain is
trained to emphasize and de-emphasize brain wave frequencies,
amplitudes and coherence is an effective training device for
stimulating enabling psychophysiologies on demand.
The brain, as part of the central nervous system, plays a
significant role in VEEOM. It is interesting to us that brain stress
must be managed in VEEOM, Russian style remote viewing and
American style remote viewing, in very similar ways. Waking
states in a human brain in real time involve electrical activity in
largely three of the four frequency ranges associated with brain

133
A. R. BORDON

activity: beta, alpha, and theta. Delta is reserved for deep sleep,
and rarely seen in a waking state human being. To perform
VEEOM on demand means good command of enabling
psychophysiologies performed on demand by an individual
knowledgeable and masterful of the process. This literally means
going from high beta (Band 2 – 38 Hz to 20 Hz, through Band 1
– 19 Hz to 15 Hz and Sensorimotor rhythm 14 Hz to 12 Hz),
bypassing alpha band (8 Hz to 11 Hz), directly into theta band
(3Hz to 7.9 Hz). When the brain is stimulated by a human being
(or by external, often technological means) to produce specific
brainwaves bands, we are induced to experience a large variety
types of mental and emotional states, with reactions consonant
with experiences in meditation, excitation, motivation, anxiety,
irritation, sexual excitement, relaxation, spiritualism and many
more. So the brain is a key element in the on demand
performance and production of VEEOM. What can it do for a
human being intent on performing VEEOM?

The first key is to know how to manage stress by reducing it


upon demand and quickly. What makes alpha and theta bands not
exactly easy to enter into on demand? Absence of knowledge,
absence of psychophysiologic know-how, and stress producing

134
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

related processes that become habitual, which make the alpha


and theta relaxed states so difficult to achieve. The cortical brain,
or neocortex, is actually the last stage of cortical evolution,
sitting atop two others: the old reptilian and the old mammalian
brains. Reptilian structures, brain-stem, have evolved in such a
way that they are now enclosed by the limbic system and the
surrounding neocortex . These three major brain structures are
connected intimately to each other. Their interaction controls the
state of stress in a human being.
The old reptilian brain is activated by pleasant views of the
ocean and a beautiful sunset, the family dog coming into the
family room with the newspaper in his mouth, one’s sense of
order and the ritual of daily events that make up one’s daily life.
All of these keep the reptilian brain from activating the stress
system. How? The locus ceruleus in the reptilian brain stem
sends signals (chemical and neuroelectric) to the hypothalamus
which is part of the limbic system. Emotional drives and urges
are centered in the limbic system which is the prime decision-
making area of the brain. The hippocampus operates memory
and is intimately connected with data retrieval and storage. It is
also centered in the limbic system, as is the thalamus which is the
organ of attention.
Stress degrades and ability to remember and concentrate on
complex subjects. Thus, anxiety and the level of activity of the
brain stress system have an immense effect on the mechanisms,
dynamics and psychophysiologies of producing VEEOM as well
as doing remote viewing. There is a negative feedback process in
the brain stress system whereby high levels of cortisol in the
blood stream act on the pituitary gland and hypo-thalamus,
causing these areas to switch off or lower the activity of the brain
stress system. Unfortunately, the locus ceruleus is not in this
feedback loop. This also has important ramifications for people
performing VEEOM. However, neurofeedback loops can help an
individual change bands almost instantaneously. One of the
things not understood by people who attempt VEEOM is that
relaxation is not enough. In Part 6, we are going to go into
exquisite detail about the requirements and the algorithmic

135
A. R. BORDON

practice that assist a human being in performing and producing


VEEOM on demand.
Therefore, it is strongly suggested that readers use the figures
of the human brain on this and the previous page to visualize the
location in the brain mentioned above. We also suggest that the
reader use any other brain images presented in this part to attain
familiarity.

Biophysical and probable biogenetic bases of sonobio-


electrogravitic vacuum-energetic encoding of matter
matrices

The physical body is surrounded by a photonic field. Human


eyes pick up this low-power emission of photons at 90 degrees
from every square inch of the body. But in people under stress,

nearly all perception (90 per cent) is filtered out in the thalamus
area of the brain, the part that deals with attention. The thalamus
is controlled by the brain’s limbic system, which looks after our
emotions, decision-making and memory. In other words, the
information that gets through this mental filter is fitted into a
visual mental model which we see as reality. Normally, people

136
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

function in high beta state of consciousness, which pushes EEG


measured brain-wave frequency above the 20Hz threshold, will
not have contact with calcium efflux events. These events we
now know to intimately affect brain function by influencing
neuronal connections are an integral part of all operations, people
operating above the 20 Hz threshold will not be affected or
exhibit talents in performing VEEOM to any marked degree.
Since people in general operate in beta, normal consciousness
acts as a barrier. But this is not an impediment. People can learn
to do VEEOM.
Operating in alpha band, encouraging work in the 7-14Hz
range, is seen to open up natural extension (or what others call
psi) abilities. If neuronal calcium efflux events are crucial to
natural extension, we appreciate the need and reason why simple
alpha training and biofeedback can bring on paranormal
functioning in humans. We know now and knew then that
military remote viewers operated in the theta band, and that this
brain-wave frequency range of 4-7Hz, located in the lower
frequencies in the 6-20Hz band, is quite more enabling of
extension activity. Since the energy of the electromagnetic wave
is related to frequency, if we lower the frequency of the brain
waves, we can think with less energy, and more energy is
available for remote viewing, which is therefore more efficient.
So theta consciousness can be viewed as a viable doorway to
extension, remote viewing and certainly VEEOM, as we shall
see.
In the former Soviet Union, the KGB and other organs of the
state were engaged in substantial biogenetic research to identify
the genetics of extension, that is to say, the genes that coded for
enzymes which facilitated what they defined as bioenergetics and
psychoenergetics, and the West knew as psi. In the last two
decades, a theory of primary and secondary psi genes has been
proposed in certain circles. However, in the case of VEEOM, a
sonobioelectrogravitic migration model of cellular energetic feed
has gained favor with us, as it appears to explain most of the
requirements of cellular energetic migration, including the
dynamics of cellular reconstitution and reconfiguration by means
vacuum/plenum “engines” (108). However, the biogenetic

137
A. R. BORDON

substratum is an active harbinger of phenomena under current


study by a small group in LPG-C, with yet no significant models
or theory.
What is significant is that it may well not be the biogenetic
substratum of genes that directly matters in
sonobioelectrogravitic migration or in the causation of VEEOM;
rather, biological genes are collectively merely an aspect, a part
of the phenomenon, in that the biogenetics of a human being and
the hologramic genome (or information substratum of the
phenomenon) are two sides of the same coin. In (27), biological
life is discussed as “bundles of electrodynamic phenomena, all of
which are photon-dependent” (p. 44). In other words, Euler +
Gibbs = abstract + visceral = topology + biochemistry =
energized or energetic reality (p. 46).
Peter Gariaev (110), (111), (112), (113), (114) , however,
proposed a far more extended solution to the infoenergetic aspect
of the hologramic genome. In these papers, Gariaev and others
proposed three axioms worth repeating here. The postulates state:
1. DNA molecules, included in chromosomes, possess a
substance--wave duality similar to the dualism of elementary
particles. In accordance with it, DNA codes an organism in two
ways, both with the assistance of DNA matter and by DNA sign
wave functions, including coding at its own laser radiation level
(61). This also includes what many researchers argue quite well:
that the genome emits light and radio-waves, whose delocalized
interference patterns create calibration fields (blueprints) for a
system's space-time organization. This holographic type of
information is being constantly and simultaneously read in
billions of cells, accounting for the quick coordinated response
typical of living systems. Gariaev and his team suggest that the
genome operates like a "complex multi-wave laser with
adjustable frequencies" (111), able to produce light and radio
waves which regulate the biosystem's space and time
organization. This complex background is the basis for the
correct expression of genetic material (peptide codes) during
embryogenesis and adult life, accounting for the elusive self-
regulation and specificity of DNA function in various tissues and
under various conditions. Various solitons (optical, acoustic,

138
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

conformational, rotation-oscillating, etc.) excited in


polynucleotide areas, and transmitted over large distances
significantly exceeding the hydrogen bond length, "become the
apparatus for continual (non-local) reading of context RNA
sequences on a whole" (111) (112) (115).
2. The genetic apparatus can be non-local at the molecular
level (holographic memory of a chromosome continuum) and at
the same time quantum mechanically non-local in compliance
with the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen effect, see (116). The latter
means that the genome genetic and other regulatory wave
information is recorded at the polarization level of its photons
and is non-locally (everywhere and in no time) transferred (plays
out) throughout the entire space of a biosystem by the
polarization code parameter. This helps to set a quick-response
information contact among the billions of cells constituting an
organism. This also sets up an interesting phenomenon in itself:
the now fact (at least to us) of accepting system and transmitting
donor.
3. The genome as a whole and the individual nucleus of cells
can generate and recognize text-associative regulatory structures
with the application of a background principle, holography and
quantum non-locality.
We agree with Sidorov, Chen and Gariaev that this is a
strong indication that noncoding areas are the basis for one or
more biological languages and represent "a strategic
informational content of chromosomes." Here we extend the
strategic informational content of chromosomes to also include
the an organizational role in providing the mental-informational
templaic form which is the form the VEEOM target must have in
space/time. The cells do not, of course, cause the object to take
form and shape into matter, but they appear to be the key means
for sonobioelectrogravitic migration, i.e., the passage of vacuum
energy from the vacuum to the target as object formed in
spacetime. So what is the cause for the object to take form in the
world? The human operator or causal agent who, like Jesus some
two-thousand years ago, can take the perception of an object and
transform it into an object is prime cause. This then brings us to
the last two pieces of the puzzle in this part: how a human being

139
A. R. BORDON

could take the perception of an object in mind (not necessarily


perception through the senses), and how to use sound in making
the object come into being.

7.10. Brain entrainment through binaural brain beats


by dichotic sound frequencies in the ears – Holosynch
and Hemi-Synch

Gerald Oster, of Mt. Sinai Medical Center, in the October


1973 issue of Scientific American, ushered in a new era in our
ability to learn, be creative, remember, control our moods, reduce
stress, resolve unwanted behavior patterns, and a host of other
desirable ends, with the appearance of his remarkable paper.
Oster’s paper, entitled "Auditory Beats in the Brain," described
how pulsations called binaural beats occurred in the brain when
tones of different frequencies were presented separately to each
ear. As a result, the entire brain became entrained to a frequency
equal to the difference between the two tones and began to
resonate to that frequency. This is what is now known as brain
entrainment. Different frequencies presented to each ear through
stereo headphones create a difference tone (or binaural beat) as
the brain puts together the two tones it actually hears.
But Oster was not the only one looking into binaural beats; so
was Robert Monroe, of the of the Monroe Institute of Applied
Sciences. In thousands of experiments, using an EEG machine to
monitor subjects’ electrical brain wave patterns, Monroe also
concluded that he could entrain brain wave patterns using
binaural beats. In addition, he noted that the response did not
happen only in the area of the brain responsible for hearing, or
only in one hemisphere or the other, but rather, the entire brain
resonated. The waveforms of both hemispheres exhibited
identical frequencies, amplitude, phase, and coherence. It was
Monroe who would ultimately gain fame, recognition and
relative fortune for his method of brain entrainment – Hemi-
Synch.
When the brain puts together the two tones into one, this is
detected through EEG monitoring of the difference tone,
identified by a change in the electrical pattern produced in the

140
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

brain. For example, frequencies of 200 Hz and 210 Hz produce a


binaural beat frequency of 10 Hz. Monitoring of the brain’s
electricity (EEG) shows that the brain produces increased 10 Hz
activity with equal frequency and amplitude of the wave form in
both hemispheres. Through this means, it is possible to use an
engineered sound source (a tape or a CD) wherein the sounds on
the tape were designed to slow the brain wave patterns from a
normal waking beta brain wave pattern to a slower alpha pattern,
then to a still slower theta pattern (the brain wave pattern of
dreaming sleep), and finally to a delta pattern, the slowest of all,
the brainwave pattern of dreamless sleep. F. Holmes (Skip)
Atwater of the Monroe Institute describes the neurophysiology of
the binaural beat brain entrainment as a process…
within the sound processing centers of the brain [that] pulse
stimulation provides relevant information to the higher centers of
the brain. In the case of a wave form phase difference the
electron pulse rate in one part of a sound-processing center is
greater than in another. The differences in electron pulse
stimulation within the sound processing centers of the brain are
an anomaly. This anomaly (the difference in electron pulse
stimulation) comes and goes as the two different frequency wave
forms mesh in and out of phase. As a result of these constantly
increasing and decreasing differences in electron pulse
stimulation, an amplitude modulated standing wave (the binaural
beat) is generated within the sound processing centers of the
brain itself. It is this standing wave which acts to entrain brain
waves (117).
The Monroe Institute’s Focus 12 Series is the one we put to
the test, as the means to teach research fellows how to produce a
visual point of view, with significant success. However, it did
not work for everyone. So we started producing our own binaural
beat sound sources, going up 1 Hz difference at a time. We found
that people marginally nonresponsive to 12 Hz binaural beat
difference were responsive to 13 Hz through 17 Hz difference.
Today, we test prospective operators on Monroe standard Focus
10 and Focus 12, and on each of the additional frequencies we
developed, until one of them generates a sustainable visual POV
in the user. Why a visual POV? It is a necessity. The visual POV

141
A. R. BORDON

is the frame within which the operator visualizes clearly the


object to be generated.

7.11. The sound of creation

And when the operator has the object to be generated in


spacetime in his or her visual POV, then comes the sound of
creation and the adrenorgasmic burst. Almost poetic with a tinge
of epicurean Eros, isn’t it?
Poetry aside, the sound of creation is another scaffolding in
the process of going from no-thing to thing, and the tinge of
epicurean Eros is not a sexual pleasure involved in the creation,
but rather a Kundalini-like burst-drawing of energetics through
the cells so that angular momenta of photons could find
themselves manifest as subparticles, each combining as needed
according to the electromagnetic template of the object(s) held in
mind as visual, 3-dimensional object in a projective space, into
atoms arranged according to the requirements of like objects in
spacetime. The metaorganization of the object is literally its
information cloud, or subquantum/spacetime form template.
What makes the manifestation so compelling? The deterministic
nature of the subquantum and its information physics, we now
know and understand, predetermines the existence of the object,
which when held in mind as objectifying form, becomes
inevitably the object itself. In this last piece of the puzzle, we are
going to briefly explore and explain what this sound is, and why
this sound and not others. To understand the system of
mathematics used in the design of the system of sounds (or
music), we need to explore the work of Wesley Bateman and
Alan Howarth as Ra Mathematics and Ra Music.

Howarth, Bateman and the Ra System

As part of the Bateman-Howarth Ra System, let’s have a


closer look here at the mathematical measurements produced by
Howard Bateman of the Great Pyramid on the Giza Plains just
southwest of Cairo, Egypt. When looking at Ra mathematics, we
will see through Bateman’s eyes; when addressing the music

142
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

produced by the Ra mathematics, we will metaphorically hear


through Howarth’s ears. In the next part, we provide the reader a
website to which one can take any piece of music to transform it
from standard music into Ra music. The difference is audibly
noticeable. We use the Ra version of the sounds we use in our
VEEOM protocols, for reasons beyond the scope of this
monograph.

Ra Measurements and Mathematics

Here we will simply focus on the measures of significance to


their application to musical scales. Bateman spent 30-plus years
deciphering the “natural measures” of our planet. He spent some
31 years studying the Great Pyramid in Egypt, and it is from
knowledge accumulated through this study that what he called
“natural system of mathematics” was derived, while the units of
measure that were derived from the system were named the
“Rods of Amon Ra.” It is due to the role played by the Great
Pyramid played in helping them gain knowledge that the body of
knowledge and measures was named the “Ra System,” after the
ancient Egyptian sun god Amon Ra. Bateman also used the Ra
system to measure distances and ratios in England, other sites in
Egypt, and in Central America.
Bateman discovered that El Camino de los Muertos (The
Way of the Dead) in Teotihuacan, between the Pyramid of the
Sun and the Pyramid of the Moon, if seen at from the air
appeared to look like a guitar’s neck and the Pyramid of the
Moon the body of the guitar. The person who first noticed this
similarly calculated that of a guitar string that had a length of
.763 meters (which is proportion of the distance between the
moon pyramid and the central axis point of the sun pyramid, or
763 standard meters) was plucked, it would vibrate at 100 cycles
(or Hz) per second. Interesting enough, the base of the Great
Pyramid in Giza was 763.407 red Ra feet (see the Pi measuring
wheel used for calculating Ra musical notes, next page). So were
the base of the Pyramid of the Sun at Teotihuacan and the length
of the platform in the Mayan city of Palenque in the Yucatan
peninsula of Mexico. Using his Ra system, he was then to

143
A. R. BORDON

determine that a guitar string that was 763.407 Ra meters (red


rams) long and would actually vibrate at 106.02875 cycles per
natural second of time (NST) – not the 100 Hz (cycles per
second) when using standard measures.

Ra Scale Ratios and Musical Scales

Two-thirds of a guitar string is said to be .509 of a standard


meter in length. In Ra meters, it is 509.116882663 Ra meters in
length. This figure is 100 times the product of Ra phi (1.62) and
Green Pi (3.142696807). The number 5.09116882663 is called
green ankh. The red Ra value for ankh is: 5.08938 (red pi x phi).
In Ra measures, 10.602875 cycles per NST is the average alpha
wave that is generated by a meditating human being and the most
frequently occurring extremely low frequency wave produced by
lightning. Moreover, in Ra Music, 10 times the average alpha
wave or 106.02875 cycles/NST represents the second octave of
“A” of the “red musical scale.
How then is a Ra musical scale established? We take 10
times the value of the average alpha wave above (106.02875
cycles/NST) and Bateman was able to establish a number of Ra
musical scales. He was able to determine that there are actually
420 possible musical scales. And found it interesting that Johann
Sebastian Bach used ratios in his well-tempered clavichord to
establish notes quite close to those in a Ra musical scale. It is
obvious Bach intuitively used ratios close to or actual Ra values
without being fully aware.
Ra musical tone frequencies are based on the natural second
of time (NST). The length of the natural second of time is
presently reserved as intellectual property. It was found by
Howarth that Ra musical tones of the red and blue formats or
red, green, and blue formats are the most sympathetic to alpha
brain wave frequencies produced by a meditating human being,
as well as theta band brain waves. As the reader can see on the
wheel (previous page), Ra formats have been assigned names.
Numbers that were mentioned above as green pi and green ankh
because they are values that are found in the green format. There
are different pi and ankh values for every one of the 420 known

144
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

Ra formats. And it is this that makes things interesting. However,


Only one of the Ra musical scales is depicted in the wheel
illustration below.

(Used with permission, from Bateman’s Ra Music Write-up.


http://www.alanhowarth.com/bio.shtml, undated)

The reader is invited to carefully study the wheel on the next


page, because from the data given above, the reader should get

145
A. R. BORDON

an inkling of how the wheel works: it rolled 121.5 degrees (most


intense spectral line of hydrogen) which produces the frequency
of the average alpha brain wave produced by a meditating human
being, or the most frequently generated elf wave produced by
lightning. This appears to not be a coincidence. LPG-C is
continuing to investigate each of the 420 musical scales, with
assistance from outside resources. And the author use Ra sound
in all di-, tri-, and tetragrammata originally used in connection
with our research in VEEOM effects.14 Since Ra Music is
proprietary, we are going to respect its status and here simply
refer you to Alan’s website for any sound conversion from man-
made to Ra system. The website is located on the net at
http://www.alanhowarth.com.
We will disclose here, however, that the tetragrammaton
most used by us in connection to VEEOM research as described
here is a sequence of 554.322 Hz — 417.441 to 432.615 Hz –
392.119 to 396.542 Hz – 417.441 to 432.615 Hz. This is the
standard file, which is also converted into Ra frequencies. Both
are available from the authors, see Note 14.
One final comment concerning our use of the Ra system of
sounds. The author and colleagues have and continue to use them
in studies concerning longevitality and the initialization of
induction for what is known as the Priore effect – the
revitalization of cells directly from the subquantum vacuum, in
combination with natural language messaging done to open and
entrain response of nuclear and mitochondrial chromosomal
strands through naturally occurring hologramic-based
communication.

7.12. Bringing it all together

The bundling of all activities is both in parallel and in series;


that is, there is an active architecture to the sequence. The
bundling of all activities is now recognized as an active
algorithm that, as an individual application, becomes a
personalized protocol which, repeated, leads to the self-same
result. Bringing it all together then requires us to individually
know the elements, the mode and style of intent deployment

146
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

(including knowing the information set of the desired object),


how to open to the vacuum, the production of a visual POV,
visually locking onto the target by internally producing a visual
POV, attending to the “song of creation” (either by hearing it or
humming it), and finally by willing energy as light into matter
within the spacetime template of the desired object by an
adrenorgasmic burst. Think of all of these activities as elements
of an algorithm
The elements of the algorithm are (1) choice, (2) vectoring of
intention, (3) information set of the desired object matrix, (4)
access, (5) vision, (6) sound, and (7) action. Each of these
involve specific activities of an enabling psychophysiology.
Everything begins with knowing what you want, that is, the
nature, quality, size, characteristics, and number of the object(s)
desired. Once this is known, the remaining elements of the
algorithm may be used to fruition.

An algorithmic architecture for producing LEOM

Image-based rendering is a powerful and promising approach


for 3D object representation in computation (119), and it is the
basis for producing LEOM. This approach considers a world-3D
target object (or a scene) as a collection of 3-D images called key
frames taken from the reference viewpoints (the human operator)
and leads the human operator to generate arbitrary views of the
object using these key frames. All of this result in a 3-
dimensional mental view of the target object collocated in a
chosen space surface or held in mind as that chosen space
surface. In this book, we described an object-based encoding
approach for the multi-view sequences of a 3D target-object and
a view-production algorithm for predicting new view-products
using an image-based rendering approach that results in a
material object. For a clear presentation and discussion of the
algorithm and its use by a human operator, see (118), or simply
go on to the next chapter.

147
A. R. BORDON

8
DOING THE DEED – THE PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC
LEOM ALGORITH

THERE IS A “FORMULA” that leads our single degree of


freedom overunity sink biomind awareness, using
psychophysiologies to produce a “thing” (or 4-spacetime object)
out of no-thing (or its subquantum templaic conformation). This
formula is an algorithm or, as we described elsewhere (128), “a
certain sort of formal process that can be counted on-logically-to
yield a certain sort of result whenever it is ‘run’ or instantiated.”
Also see Daniel C. Dennett (“Darwin’s Dangerous Idea”, Simon
& Schuster, 1995, pp. 50-51) (129). We also said (a) an
algorithm has substrate neutrality, (b) an underlying
mindlessness, and (c) guaranteed results.
The substrate or basic neutrality of an algorithm allows you
to use the underlying procedure on anything it can be applied to,
using any logical system you want. The power of the procedure
is due to its logical structure, not just the causal powers of the
materials used in the instantiation, just so long as those causal
powers permit the prescribed steps to be followed exactly
The mindlessness of the prescribed steps is what makes the
algorithm logical, because the logic of the steps and their
sequencing are simple. An algorithm worked out by you for you
will not necessarily work for me or for your mate, or for Jaime,
or for anyone else. The KEY here is that algorithms are as
personal as the imprints on your iris or the patterns on your
fingerprints. What is presented here is a process you need to
translate to your body and biomind, and the unexpected
experience will be (albeit new to you) exhilarating to your
biomind, for it gets to awaken or “express” a function already
inscribed in your DNA, and this your biomind knows deeply.
There is a general process which a user then must devise as an
internal, repeatable procedure. Your biomind already know and
knows it well. In a manner of speaking, it knows better than the
ego-personality you think is you. There is one key thought to be

148
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

understood from the outset, and it is simply this: you are a


biomind, where the mind sets the course and the body follows.
The “sequence” presented and described here will be given in as
generic a language set as possible, for your interpretation of what
is written is THE most crucial aspect of this endeavor. As first
impressions are lasting, so are first imprints (or interpretations
given by the mind for processes and procedures it wishes the
body to comply and perform). It is here that we can help with, for
in writing this chapter, we had to revisit our first times and the
“newbie” moments of others who have already performed MPO-
LEOM feats.

8.1 Replication

Can you imagine now a real Star Trek-type replicator capable


of replicating a nice fish dish, or a delicious apple pie, or a turkey
and cheese sandwich on rye bread? We are sure you can, but are
we asking the right question on this matter? Perhaps not. If a
replicator is possible, what does it mean in terms of creating
objects out of thin air? Is the object replicated a duplication,
imitation, copy, or reproduction? Is the object you wish to light-
encode its matrix as product a replication, duplication, imitation
of another, copy, or reproduction?
First, let’s state the obvious, and then explore the quantum
meaning of things. It means that an object in spacetime has a
quantum potential template or subquantum regimens, and both
the object and the quantum template are information sets that can
be grasped, captured, and stored in a suitable medium. This also
means the replicator must have quantum computing capabilities
and the ability to read and recognize the quantum numbers of any
macro-quantum object. What, really, are these quantum numbers
denoting and describing? What aspect of the object – a cell
phone, an apple, money – are described by the quantum
numbers? They are denoting and describing the macro-quantum
object itself. We will explain that further below. Human beings,
in their Meissner fields and living matrices, already have
quantum computing capabilities inscribed and mostly latent.

149
A. R. BORDON

In the case of us human complex oscillating biological


entities (or COBEs), we have Meissner-antiMeissner nonionizing
fields surrounding our bodies at 90 degrees perpendicular and
away from the surfaces of the body, and these fields within fields
function as our memory and information processing capacities
well beyond our cortical awareness. Animals and plants also
have Meissner-antiMeissner fields but do not appear to have the
capacity to extend antiMeissner harmonics.* Non ionizing fields
emitted by the living matrices of any living system on Earth
would qualify as Meissner range fields, as their electromagnetic
range lies within the extremely low frequencies (ELF) of 1 Hz
and 1560 Hz, though mostly from 1 Hz to 120 Hz.
When we say “Meissner” we mean the fundamental or
physical body’s Meissner field; and when we say “antiMeissner”
we are talking about the fundamental Meissner field’s first,
second, third harmonic, and so on. Since this Meissner-
antiMeissner field complex of ours is on 24/7/365, it also has
interactive, interfacing, read-and-compute, read-and-compose,
and read-and-extend, among other “extended human functions.”
The human Meissner field was first detected and measured by us
in 1994, in verification of work by Mae Wan Ho (UK), Karl
Popp (Germany), and Herbert Frohlich (Germany), and was
named after Alexander Meissner – an Austrian engineer who had
developed antennas which were able to detect long waves while
working for Telefunken in Berlin, in 1907.

150
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

However, simply because the human Meissner field


expressions are low-powered cellular maxima of approximately
1.2 volts per cell, the total possible output of a human being as
overunity sink is about one quadrillion volts, taking into
consideration the total cellular capacitance of the body. And this
capacitance level is sufficient to MPO one’s reality or LEOM
most anything we want.
Each target is also a quantum macro-object, with a geometric
form in 4-spacetime and a fuzzy form (with a geometry of its
own) in the subquantum. As you LEOM an MPOed object, the
visualization of the target object is of the actual, physical object.
However, the overunity sink (i.e., the enteric brain complex in
the ventral area and the thoracic cavity of the human body) is
aimed at the subquantum potential templaic conformation of the
4-dimensional object. The moment visual vector-intention is
locked on the target object in 4-spacetime (an actual physical
object to be replicated or an internal visual target), the
subquantum potential templaic lock occurs automatically. You
don’t have to do anything consciously for this to happen; one’s
enteric complex, indeed, one’s entire cellular make up, performs
that function for you beyond normal awareness. Replication, in
this instance, and by the use of this procedure as algorithmic
arrangement, is light-encoding by the “mirror-action” of one

151
A. R. BORDON

template (subquantum potential) so that the other (4-spacetime)


template can manifest as macro-quantum object. Let’s examine
an example, and this may help you understand this seeming
“dance” of one template with the other in a kind of Texas two-
step.
Take a look at the picture on this page. above. This is a
graphic representation of a fuzzy boundary geometrized
subquantum potential-template of an orange. A way of
understanding this graphic representation (which is not identical
or isomorphic to what neurosensors “see” when they look at the
quantum-potential templaic conformation of a 4-dimensional
orange) is to think of the templaic conformation as having
infinite “dimensions” –dimensions of space and time in the
angular momenta of all potential subparticles that are not matter
yet, in a ratio of space/time that makes possible and easy the
light-encoding of this conformation and manifesting it as the fruit
we know as orange. So when you think hologramically about the
orange you visualize in your mind as 4-dimensional, do you have
to worry about the quantum-potential templaic conformation of
the orange? No, you don’t.
But you need to obey one
rule of all holomovement
in the Unum: the Texas
two-step has to be danced
backward; that is, you start
out allowing your MPO to
light-encode the reality-
orange at its thought-
matrix from its physical (or
4-dimensional) center
outward. Every LEOM moment filmed shows this unique pattern
of manifestation. It doesn’t matter where in the world you are,
the same thing happens – from the inside to the outside. This is
an important piece of information. Remember it.

152
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

The Quantum Numbers

Name Symbol Values

Principal
any integer from 1 to
Quantum n
infinity
Number

Azimuthal
any integer from 0 to
Quantum L
n-1
Number

Magnetic
any integer from -L
Quantum mL
to +L
Number

Spin
Quantum ms +/- ½
Number

8.2. How we do magic: Quantum numbers and light-


encoding
How is this encoding done? Above, we mentioned quantum
numbers of any macro-quantum object. There are four of them:

Amazingly, the information processing “handshake” function


between one’s mental thought of the target (which is itself the
template of the target already) and the subquantum information
template of the target performs all necessary calculations to
know precisely where in spacetime to begin light-encoded
manifestation by following the “framework” provided by the
“mirror dance” of the two templates (4-spacetime and

153
A. R. BORDON

subquantum-potential) mentioned above. How we “know” how


to do such things is at this time still beyond our complete
understanding so the model is that we humans have it inscribed
in our DNA. That, however, is merely an hypothesis that has not
been really looked at as yet. We know, though, that the
materialization of ANY object lies within the process of material
coherence facilitated by these four numbers and how their values
are manipulated to accommodate transmuted light into
elementary particles (electrons, specifically) and atoms from
these. All of what follows here is a mere reminder of what you
already know “in your gut” (no pun intended).
Quantum Numbers. The enteric and Meissner
information processing function calculates the n and L values
automatically, determining the kinds of atom, the number of
orbits each will need to have, and the atoms’ azimuthal quantum
number or value of quantum angular momentum. In the
chemistry of the LEOMed object, this quantum number is very
important, since it specifies the shape of its atomic orbitals and
strongly influences chemical bonds and bond angles. These two
numbers then produce the sequence of orbitals or wavefunction
for all atoms of each kind required to collocate in the matter of
which the object is made. It also tells you how much and what
strength of energy to use to encode what is needed, where it is
needed. The magnetic quantum number tells you the quantum
state of an electron and denotes the energy level within a subshell
in the electron cloud of circling electrons. The spin quantum
number gives the value of the spin of a particle. When the
spectral lines of the hydrogen spectrum are examined at very
high resolution, they are found to be closely-spaced doublets.
This splitting is called fine structure and was one of the first
experimental evidences for electron spin. The direct observation
of the electron’s intrinsic angular momentum was achieved in the
Stern-Gerlach experiment. When the idea of electron spin was
first introduced in 1925, even Wolfgang Pauli had trouble
accepting Ralph Kronigs model. The problem was not that a
rotating charged particle would have given rise to a magnetic
field, but that the electron was so small that the equatorial speed

154
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

of the electron would have to be greater than the speed of light


for the magnetic moment to be of the observed strength.
Throughout the LEOMing process, the encoding of light
energy is very much as if an invisible quantum computer were
“writing” the object into existence. We say “invisible” because
so far we don’t quite understand how the computing capacities of
the human biomind enteric complex works. We know it does,
and does very well. Moreover, this invisible quantum computer
is the subquantum negative of the positive image in your mind or
of the object desired. And the computer is very much like a glove
of the object superposed upon the object at a “relative distance”
of some 720 degrees away from the spacetime occupied by the
object itself or the “spacetime address” you wish to put the
LEOMed object in.
Quantum numbers describe the electron energies in the atoms
of an object. The question of how many quantum numbers are
needed to describe any given object has no consistent and
universal answer, because for each target object our
enteromyofascial/Meissner field complex as “quantum
biocomputer” must find the answer for a full analysis of the
object’s system. So, in 1930, French mathematician Paul Dirac
developed a new version of the Schrödinger Wave Equation
which was relativistically invariant, and predicted the magnetic
moment correctly, and at the same time treated the electron as a
point particle. In the Dirac equation all four quantum numbers
including the additional quantum number s arose naturally during
its solution. And all of these calculations are performed by the
biomind for every atom to be collocated as light-encoded atomic
matter in the object’s quantum-potential/4-spacetime mirror-
matrices!

8.3 . More magic: Biogenetic basis of LEOM-MPO or the


Biomind minding the body

Interesting also that DNA plays an important, some would


say crucial, role in the LEOM of an object or the MPO of a
personal reality. This is not just human DNA affecting cells of
one’s body, but also language affecting DNA itself. Moreover,

155
A. R. BORDON

our decipherment of DNA/environment interaction from what is


predicted by the Working Model (see Foundation Reports in
Life Physics, Vol 1, No. 1 essays) indicates that information
bandwidths (electromagnetic ionizing, EM nonionizing, sound,
electroluminescent) play a role in DNA expression,
modifications, and retrofitting. Imagine this: take the information
bandwidth of the fertilized gamete of a rat and transmit that to
the fertilized gamete of a gerbil and what do you get as a result?
A rat born to a gerbil. This has been done in our labs and also
done in Russia a few years ago. We also found that just about
everything has a ”languaging system” unique to itself: DNA
responds to sound and to EM (ionizing and nonionizing) and
scalar (or beyond the EM) energetics. You can literally talk to
your cells and change their DNA. You can also talk to the cells
of another person and change them, too. It is all in the frequency
ranges you use to communicate not just meaning, but also sound.
Do your cells understand words themselves and the sound you
use in uttering them? Better than you and in all of their
denotations and connotations.
The important biogenetic basis of LEOM-MPO from the
biomind minding the body is what the cytogenetic
(cellular/genetic) aspect of the biomind’s living matrix literally
creates around the body-form: a nonionizing high energetic
domain that, when measured with certain instruments, tells us
this (Meissner) field is really a vacuum or plasma-like domain.
Can we extend ourselves onto a rock or a mountain and “exist”
there for a while in a kind of extension-visit while keyed to our
physical body? Yes. And this is the basis of extension
neurosensing. How far can we “go” on these extension “tours”?
By our calculations, it seems we are capable of extending some
30 billion light years without breaking a sweat. This, by the way,
gives new meaning to the saying, “the universe in a grain of
sand, and the whole of creation in a thought.” But that’s not all;
what is said is only in our known universe. Actually, we can now
go to the T-boundary – the source of everything itself.
See the LPG-C website for more information and ongoing
updates, at www.lifephysicsgroup.org/index.html.

156
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

8.4. Algorithmic arrangement: The formulation of


LEOM

The reader may now feel that having asked what time is it
does not require to know how the clock works. Or does it? With
LEOM and MPO, it does. The essence of the idea is simply that
with the power to do LEOM and MPO personal realities, there is
personal responsibility consonant to the use of the power.
The entire algorithmic sequence that follows has grammar
rules (or rules of manifestation), syntactic rules (or how to put
things together to get the result desired), and semantic rules (or
what words/meanings to use to activate the necessary aspect of
the DNA in our living matrix). And the entire sequence is
predicated on three single basic logic statements that form a
LEOM syllogism:

EVERYTHING THOUGHT IS REAL


I AM CAUSE BECAUSE I AM THOUGHT.
THEREFORE, MY THOUGHTS ARE
REAL

GRAMMAR

1. Manifest production observership (MPO) of any object’s


reality matrix by light encoding depends upon your complete
acceptance and ownership of the logic of the syllogism above.
Failure to do so (in the form of suspension of the belief
engendered in the logical statements) will result in no result at
all.

2. Thought is real and the cause of coherence of matter by the


design of an existing template.

3. Biomind (mind+body in unison) is cause by use of creational


algorithm applied to specific product/moment. All results of such
application(s) are declared to be product-condensates in a
horizontal time-moment.

157
A. R. BORDON

GRAMMAR

1. Manifest production observership (MPO) of any object’s


reality matrix by light encoding depends upon your complete
acceptance and ownership of the logic of the syllogism above.
Failure to do so (in the form of suspension of the belief
engendered in the logical statements) will result in no result at
all.
2. Thought is real and the cause of coherence of matter by the
design of an existing template.
3. Biomind (mind+body in unison) is cause by use of creational
algorithm applied to specific product/moment. All results of such
application(s) are declared to be product-condensates in a
horizontal time-moment.
4. Biomind operation of light-encoding is from alpha-point (in
4-spacetime) to the edge of the object’s 4-spacetime template;
coherence encoding obeys the Planck limit between 4-spacetime
and quantum-potential templates using it as a threading-like
back-and-forth dance.
5. Biomind operation of the fixing mechanism for alpha-point in
spacetime is the physical pair of eyes of the operator, and the
dish mechanism is one of the hands cupped in the general
direction of the alpha-point.
6. Biomind operationalization of the sequence is the following
of a set of discrete sequenced mental and physical actions
adjusted to individual differences and personal idiosyncrasies,
and directed at the biomind-caused materialization of a target
object.
7. The biomind possesses a threshold knowledge base of the
object whose 4-spacetime matrix is being light-encoded; on the
basis of this direct and implied knowledge base about the target
object will its templates (4-spacetime and subquantum) will the
object supply a lack in material 4-dimensional reality fit to the
world-demand characteristics necessary for the object to be
consumed or used by the creator or the intended recipient.

158
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

SYNTAX & SEMANTIC HANDLES

The syntax of MPO-LERM is internal, wordless and silent.


No exceptions.
The psychophysiologies make the operator become single
degree of freedom (body functioning as a single whole), behave
as an overunity sink (above threshold kundalini energetics at the
cellular level), become focused (hemispheric synchronization
that allows clear internal stereoscopic visualization), make/use/
hear the “sounds of creation,” and experience an adrenorgasmic
burst that results in the coherence of the desired object. All of
these need to be done internally as silent, wordless
psychophysiologies that will be remembered by the body upon
command. This is, without any doubts, the crucial, most
important realization to make LEOM happen.

1. Single degree of freedom. The psychophysiology for


this syntactic requirement is a REQUISITE level of relaxation.
The level of relaxation must be keyed to a trigger wordless
experience or thought that will elicit the desired
psychophysiological state by its mere occurrence in mind. This is
the very process used by the 40-year old baseball pitcher, main
character of the film For The Love of the Game (played by Kevin
Costner) to quiet down the noise level in the stadium just before

159
A. R. BORDON

a pitch – “Clear the mechanism.” He used it as both utterance


and thought. Here, however, the formula requires that the
elicitation be wordless and silent.

The formula is designed as a child-like elicitation of a known


fact, either as an image, a feeling, or as movement that involves
the body itself. Communication with cells must be in physical
present tense as their time regime is only present-tense. The
meaning-experiential content of the formula is actually an
induction protocol for getting the cells prepped to engage in
overunity energetics, or cellular capacitance beyond threshold
(i.e., 1.2 volt per cell) by way of a kundalini procedure. The last
thought in the sequence needs to be set up as cue to the
development of overunity sink. At this moment, the operator
must use the cue to bring the visual field of the target object to
mind’s eye. And eyes may be opened or closed. If the physical
eyes are opened, it is best to keep focus diffused, as attention is
kept on the mind’s eye visual field containing the target object.
2. Overunity Sink. The collection of overunity (or
suprathreshold) energetics per cell is source to the single degree
of freedom overunity, which becomes sink upon engaging
visualization of target. Overunity is a descriptive term that refers
to how much energy do the cells retain as electrostatic, Poynting,
and bioelectromagnetic energies in the gamma range at the
cellular level. This must be done by using a kundalini-style

160
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

drawing of energy up the spine, or by using an


sonobioelectrogravitic (SBEG) drawing through every cell in the
body directly from the vacuum/plenum. All of this needs to be
done without any effort in the least. In fact, the need is to relax
sufficiently to allow the central nervous system and the cortical
brain to systemically function with a predominance of alpha,
theta and delta brainwaves occipitally, parietally and frontally.
3. Hemispheric-synchronized Visualization of Target
Information Set. Another skill set necessary is the ability to
visualize the target in a clear and concise manner, based on all
available information about the target matrix conformation and
characteristics Of course, different targets will have different
information set requirements. A perfect, ripe sweet orange will
have an information set quite different from that of a roll of
WHITE cotton yarn or a digital photographic camera (your
favorite brand). But how would one synchronize one’s cortical
brain hemisphere in such a way that they produce much needed
effects and psychophysiol- Frontal Occipital
ogical states? The two effects
as psychophysiological states
we seek in this case are:
profound relaxation at the
alpha, theta and delta ranges in
bilateral hemispheric brain
functioning, and the ability to
visualize readily and without
effort. A technology associated
with the efforts of Robert
Monroe to facilitate precisely P i l
such neurobehavioral results was the use of sound to adjust both
hemisphere into synchronized functioning. Hemispheric
Synchronization® was thus born. Here is how it works.
Hemi-Sync, as the sound technology came to be known, is
able to balance the right and left brain hemispheres of users in
approximately three minutes. It achieves brain hemispheric
synchronization through vibration entrainment that utilizes the
frequency-following response of the brain’s reticular-activating
system. The most desirable balanced brain-wave frequencies—

161
A. R. BORDON

Delta, Theta, Alpha, and Beta—are all below 32 Hz, but the
human ear cannot hear frequencies below 60 Hz. Therefore, the
brain cannot entrain to the desirable frequencies simply by
listening to sound waves at those frequencies. However, Hemi-
Sync uses a binaural beat and other sound technologies, playing
slightly different frequencies into each ear in a way that causes
the brain to “hear” the difference; for example, playing 100 Hz
into one ear and 104 Hz into the other ear causes the brain to
“hear” 4 Hz and drop to Delta.
In actual practice, what we look for is the ability of an
experienced meditator in less than three minutes. In other words,
the cortical activity of an adept meditator who had been regularly
practicing and/or teaching TM for some time. If our operator was
hooked up to an EEG machine, his/her EEG activity during
baseline would show an asynchronous state throughout the
cortex. The primary cortical activity would be that of high-
frequency Alpha activity combined with some Theta and Beta
waves especially concentrated in the left temporal lobe. Once a
stable baseline is achieved, we want our operator’s cortical
activity to begin to slow down and show signs of phasic-bilateral
synchrony. Within a matter of minutes then, the operator’s
primary cortical activity should show low frequency Alpha
across the cortex.
Is all of this possible?
Oh, yes! Upon use of Hemi-Synch audio CDs (Introduction
to Focus 10 and/or Focus 12) for a period of some thirty to
forty-five minutes as training for the results we described above,
our operator in training can expect to show a basal experience of
asynchronous alpha, theta and beta activity across the board,
with beta prevalent on the frontal lobe. Once this basal
experience stabilizes, the operator’s primary brain activity should
begin to move toward synchronized theta, with secondary
activity as synchronized alpha activity. Once LEOM is
achieved, the operator’s bilateral hemispheric activity should
resemble the basal experience of asynchronous alpha and theta,
with beta in the frontal lobe completely nonexistent. One
interesting phenomenon we noted was that the more exposure
(i.e., training time) the operator logged in use of Hemi-Synch,

162
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

the faster he/she would achieve bilateral synchronization and


thereby whole-brain integration. With such continuing
psychophysiological education of internal processes, we can then
say that the operator will reach a level best described as cortical
normalization – the ability to drop to the desired state in 180
seconds or less. It is in this state that an ability to visualize on
demand appears as if by magic. It is then the operator’s task to
gain control of this ability, not by force of practice, but by
learning to make the phenomenon responsive to his/her vector
intention. It is here that something akin to the movie character’s
strategy (equivalent to speaking, “clear the mechanism”) has
been known to come in quite handy –not as a verbalization, but
some other modality of expressing one’s vector intention without
words. Is it then possible to reenter the desired state of
consciousness after a period of practical mastery of the sound
technology’s induction of the desired state? Yes, it is. The body
does not forget what the mind instructs and shows, and it then
can induce the desired state without any external cue or
technology.
Please note that the Monroe Institute has a useful tool that,
although not absolutely necessary, it does assist in the internal
education of receiving and using internal cues via external
nonverbal guidance. Look for Mind Food.® Also, for a more
extensive treatment of these elements, see (3).
The key importance of this element is to produce the desired
state without external cues and on demand.

8.5. Repertoires: LEOM of affinity matrices and self-chosen


MPOs

As most newbies, the reader most probably tends to think of


self-sufficiency in terms of an ability to acquire necessities of life
by purchasing power – that is, by having the money to buy and
consume what you and your family need. LEOM on demand and
self-guided MPO throws this usual and customary way of
thinking and traditional behavior into disarray. To LEOM and
self-guide one’s MPO means being able to meet your needs
without necessarily relying on acquisitive power by means of

163
A. R. BORDON

money. To LEOM and self-guide MPO also requires one to


develop a repertoire of types of things you for which you have
affinity (by desire, belief, need, preference, proclivity and
continuous use), and these things then become your LEOM
repertoire as part of your self-guided MPO. Thus, in a manner of
speaking, you can develop two kinds of repertoires on the basis
of desire, belief, need, preference, proclivity, and continuous use.

Do you believe you can LEOM a nonliving MPO target?

Do you believe you can LEOM a living MPO target?

This is where the information set about a target begins.

MPO, Information Sets, and the Probability of Possibilities

The options for answering the question above are three, and
only three. All other replies are variations of these three: YES,
DON’T KNOW, and NO. Herein are then the probability of
possibilities.
If YES, you get to move to the DO stage, and get on with the
LEOM of your desire without further ado.
If NO, is this belief a barrier to your formulation of your
LEOM, since a manifest production observership is supposed to
be based on the belief that this process is possible and will result
in a LEOM of the object you desire, need, prefer, like and/or use.
Wait a sec! Let’s not mix apples and pear, no pun intended!
MPO is the reality you construct as your world, and THIS is
based upon what one believes possible, desirable, and obtainable.
LEOM, on the other hand, has NOTHING to do with belief, as it
is an algorithmic procedure that, should a monkey be able to do it
without using a single word, the monkey could conceivably get
what he wants when he wants it. So beware of what you wish! It
can be highly beneficial, but it also can create a lot of problems
without intending. To say NO simply requires a suspension of
belief and a desire to give the algorithm a try, without judgment
or distraction. Being aware of one’s wish has more to do with
knowledge about the information set of the object targeted than

164
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

an impediment to perform LEOM based on the belief that one


can’t do it. We will discuss information sets below.
And then, there is DON’T KNOW, which is not to
necessarily mean MAYBE.
At this juncture, it is necessary for the reader to know that the
intend-message MAYBE sent to one’s cells and enteric brain
concerning the LEOMing of a target object is that of a split mind
– that is, to getting the object’s matrix light-encoded as
materialized object in 4-spacetime. MAYBE splits one’s vector-
intention into a YES and a NO, and confuses the enteric brain
into inaction. The worst thing to have is a neurotic enteric brain,
trained into inaction by double messages and double entendres
(meanings) (though, not necessarily of a risqué or sensual
nature). Again, the most viable way to look past the possibility of
no-result by split mind is to suspend the belief set of one of the
“minds” in favor of using the mindless algorithm for what it is: a
means to a desired end. If nothing comes of it, the NO would
have it; but if nothing ventured, nothing gained is the position
adopted, then gain is possible. What is then ventured is the
suppression of the NO element in the belief-approach to the
phenomenon, and let the chips fall where they may. Then is gain
possible, and the achievement of LEOM probable.
Most newbies either begin with a NO or a DON’T KNOW
internal stance.
Strangely enough, a NO is easier to reverse than a DON’T
KNOW, but it is also the most fragile to negative results on first
try.
NO is a clear vector-intention supported by world-based
belief and experience. It is also the most susceptible to change by
information and mental representation supportive of the fact of
LEOM. It is also the most susceptible to the logic of everyday
LEOMing of one’s reality. NO is belief response dubiously
supported by imagination and fear. When imagination can be
stolen away from NO support of the question, do you believe you
can LEOM a living or nonliving object from your self-guided
MPO? In the world, belief is an engine that action may use to an
end, and one then has the means to guide the vector-intention
away from a negative and toward an imagination-borne

165
A. R. BORDON

possibility of how it can be done that can lead to a YES. As YES


arrived at in this manner, it is a conditional YES, provided the
process works the first time around, so it requires a posited proof,
a speculative vision of the possibility . When it does result in a
positive proof, it is a triumph of ego-belief and personality-
vector-intention. Nothing is wrong with this outcome. It is when
it doesn’t that a NO-turned-YES stance can lead to internal
dissonance and self-castigation. The ones who wish to pull
themselves up and move on to a new trial, do so and most, if not
all, produce one eventually.
What is not realized by newbies who reply in the negative or
with a DON’T KNOW to the belief question is that each of them
already perform LEOM on all MPOs in their lives, including but
not limited to their “individual reality.”
A DON’T KNOW stance on the belief question is initially
most susceptible to demonstration by information set and
knowledge instigation. These are the people who depend highly
on their imagination to wrap their minds around an event deemed
possible, or probable, by their manifest vector-intentions. It has
been our experience that people who DON’T KNOW and who
have inquiring minds are the best combination for LERM event
acquisition.
We strongly suggest that you treat all targets as Qualified
information sets. When moving onward on an information set to
LEOM its matrix, call on the matrix to complete the set with
accurate information (though this is often not always necessary,
as the templates will not only initialize the process but also fill in
the gap[s] once a target subjected from one’s MPO reality is
acted upon by LEOM. Nevertheless, to know an information set
of a desired object is a plus in favor of the probability expression
of what one thinks is possible to LEOM. Let me illustrate the
point.
Not What You Think IS, But What IS. In past LEOM
training sessions back in 2001, conducted for research fellows
participating in some of our projects, a young man then in his
mid-20s wanted to LEOM a car – in itself, quite an ambitious
and adventurous undertaking. Curious as both instructors
conducting the sessions were, I being one of them, we let it pass

166
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

and let it be. When he announced he wished to have a car during


one of the training sessions, we simply said “OK, go ahead, see
what happens.” Some months later, he announced triumphantly
that he had LEOMed “a car.” But neither the other instructor nor
I could understand the despondency in the voice of the young
man when he called us to tell of the news. This minor mystery
would play itself out upon his arrival with “the car” in tow. He
said he had wanted a “red, 1965 Ford Mustang hard top, with all
the trimmings and loaded to the hilt.” When he came into the lab,
we both expected to be invited outside to see “the car.” He did
invite us out to the parking lot, but there was no “red, 1965 Ford
Mustang hard top, with all the trimmings and loaded to the hilt”
sitting there. Instead, his old vehicle was there. Without
preambles and a word in as explanation, he rushed to the trunk of
his car, motioning us over for a look at something. He said he
needed “help with the thing.”
Inside the trunk, a cardboard box cut open to hold an object
contained a beautiful “red, 1965 Ford Mustang hard top, with all
the trimmings and loaded to the hilt” model car. We helped him
carry the not exactly light-weight model inside. Sheepishly, the
young man turned to us to admit that he asked for “a car,” but did
not specify the information set of a “full size Mustang.” Instead,
he used the “model car” of a Mustang he had at home as “the
target” for what he wanted as full size vehicle. He used a
“thought” model of what he wanted, without specifying that the
thought represented the actual full size car of his heart’s desire.
In other words, his target’s information set was quite accurate,
except that it was the wrong target he asked for, and created.
This is now known among our research fellows as “the E-Rule.”
Ask not what you think it is, but what it really is. The E in the
name of the rule is to recognize the young man’s contribution by
using his name’s first letter as the rule’s denotation.
This is what today we know as Qualified Information Sets,
or QIS.
If it is a car you wish, make sure you “know” it right down to
the color, feel and make of the interior. One does not have to be a
mechanic to get it, but it does help to know and distinguish the
class of object of one’s desire. The difference will always be

167
A. R. BORDON

crucial – and the difference between a model car and a real world
car. A QIS is what one qualifies as the nature and class of object
one desires. And it is to a QIS one must add information, or
access information from available “templates,” with which to
make the QIS be exactly what is desired.
The E-Rule is at the heart of QIS. It applies to man-made
objects, “natural” objects, representational objects (like money),
or any other class of world objects. World objects, as we teach
our research fellows and others, is the composite of matter based
on templates of the object present in spacetime and also
expressed in the subquantum, as subquantum information for and
of that object. In other words, one does not have to be an fruit
orchard farmer to LEOM a red, juicy apple or any other fruit,
anymore than one would have be hold graduate degrees in
electrical or other kinds of engineering to LEOM an appliance.
But one does have to consider the viability rule of LEOMing an
object: to make an object LEOMed viable (i.e., useful and usable
in your world), it has to fit in the scheme of accounting and
control for the class of object you create. Imagine having the
desire to LEOM money, an expensive watch, diamonds, a bar of
gold, a car, or any other thing that is “tracked” by control
systems which assign a “recognition” imprint or imprimatur to
the set membership of any batch manufactured the old fashioned
way.
Will the result(s) of what is done be viable objects? In other
words, will they be of any use to you? To be able to use
LEOMed $ 100 bills, there is information to be included in the
information set such that it would make the outcome bills viable
for you to use, and even then, in large quantities, it is definitely
NOT advisable. Same with diamonds – any large amount of cut
or uncut diamonds do attract a lot of attention. Accounting of
ownership can render LEOMed diamonds less than viable and
even create problems for the “owner.” Thus, when taking into
consideration the two rules mentioned here, it is smart to
consider that the QIS of a target plays a crucial role in making
any object of LEOM outcome be something viable for the
operator. Then, it pays to QIS everything.

168
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

8.6 How to use attention

Attention deployment will also be a crucial element in how


one uses the algorithmic set. There are four functional attention
modalities: broad internal, narrow internal, broad external, and
narrow external. Let me explain further.
Broad internal – locating the site of a headache with
sympathetic pains all over the head, getting a feel for a bloated
sensation, determining why you are unhappy. A deployment of
attention to event or phenomenon inside that does not focus on
any specific aspect but rather encompasses all or most of the
event or phenomenon in its scope of perception.
Narrow internal – focusing on a mantram during a
Transcendental Meditation session, focusing on the precise site
of pain anywhere in the body, focusing on your breathing or
heartbeat. A deployment of attention to event or phenomenon
that draws focus specifically on the event or phenomenon or on
any specific aspect of it as its scope of perception.
Broad external – looking at a valley from a lookout point
high up a hill, looking down from an airplane window to the
ground, looking out at the ocean from a beach. A deployment of
attention to an event or phenomenon that focuses on a broad
swath of space without stopping to focus on any one aspect as its
scope of perception.
Broad internal – looking at a cut on someone else’s arm,
touching or petting a dog or cat, looking for a familiar face on a
photograph. A deployment of attention to an event or
phenomenon that draws focus specifically on an aspect of it as its
scope of perception
In the course of using the algorithmic arrangement of
activities on page 12, anyone who attempts to LEOM a target
object will be using most, if not all, of the attention deployment
modalities mentioned above.

169
A. R. BORDON

The practical aspects of the algorithm are a series of acts that


engender, lead to, and generate the needed psychophysiologies.
Before getting into the details, let’s clearly establish that the
activities are parallel to one another, in a sequence from 1 to 7.
The fact of their parallel collocation in the arrangement is due to
the need to have the operator use a broad internal attention
capable of encompassing each in sequence, without losing
awareness of the previous one. In other words, awareness needs
to encompass them all, additively in sequence. It is in this
mental environment that the psychophysiological states add up
and lead to the desired burst-moment.

The practice of the algorithm is as follows:


1
See the above image as a representation of your span of
attention: broad internal and broadly inclusive in parallel on what
needs to be done. The first order of business is To intend, which
is the action verb of to desire. Our operator has already chosen
the object, so there is a target and it has been subjected to QIS. If
not, he/she needs to QIS it before proceeding any further.
When to intend is the first order to be carried out in the
algorithmic sequence-arrangement, the operator knows
EXACTLY what is desired, the information set of the item
desired is known and fully understood (and if there is
information not available to the operator at this instant in the
timeline of the algorithmic arrangement, the operator knows
enough and the information set has been sufficiently qualified
such that the E-Rule will be avoided altogether). The desire is
clear and mind/body is of one vector-intention regarding the
object desired. When clear and unobstructed by anything, move
on to include the next action into broad internal attention:

170
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

2
The object of intent is not set aside or forgotten. It remains in
the foreground but it does not receive any further focused
attention. Instead, focused attention is drawn to the opening to
the vacuum, which is the first positive action toward achieving
the light encoding of one’s targeted object matrix. To open to the
vacuum means to drop into theta and delta on demand and most
immediately. In this action, the training done with the Gateway
material from the Monroe Institute will come in most handy. In
this action, mentally “initialize” (make a mental pass through
ALL of the cells on the surface of your body to about two inches
deep). Some choose to “initialize” their bodies by, prior to this
action-moment, training him/herself to make a pass throughout
the entire body – surface and depth, to one’s very biological core.
The repetition of the action by training makes it possible for the
operator to achieve this initialization to completion in a matter of
30 seconds or less.
This behavioral act makes each of the cells in our operator’s
body become the source of the energetics for energetic encoding
of the desired object’s matrix. The energy is not yet drawn onto
the body; instead, all cells open to the vacuum/plenum by way of
infrared signaling system from the cell to the subquantum
domain. If the reader does not believe in the reality of this
possibility, he/she is invited to approach a Qi master and ask this
person to lightly hit the unbeliever’s upper arm and see how far
he/she flies away by this mere “light” touch. This is NOT
Hollywood trickery. Instead, it is the master’s ability to, relaxed
and focused, draw energy from the vacuum/plenum and transfer
in the touch the cumulus of the energy drawn onto the body of
the unbeliever, who blithely flies away at the touch.
This is then the energy which will momentarily be used in
encoding the target object. But the transfer of energy won’t
necessarily be done by storing it in the body and then transferring
it to the object’s matrix. The operator’s body will not do so, as it
needs to follow instructions to be able to generate sufficient
adrenorgasmic vector-intentional burst toward the end of the
process. But we are getting ahead of ourselves here.

171
A. R. BORDON

3
The necessary energy to power the body for the instant of
adrenorgasmic burst of the vector-intention directed at the
manifestation of a fully encoded matrix must come from the
Earth. To do so, we use a Kundalini technique to draw Earth
energy from the ground up through the dantien, up through the
spinal column, up the neck, up the occipital part of the brain,
over the crown, down the forehead and the face, down the front
part of the neck and depositing energy in the ventral cavities of
the body – the enteric and thoracic cavities – as if they were
empty containers thirsting for energy. This is done to satiation;
that is, it is done until the hands, arms, thoracic and ventral
cavities crawl with energy – all the while REMAINING and
staying relaxed in one’s broad internal range of attention, body,
and mind.
If the reader is unacquainted with traditional or contemporary
Chinese medicine and does not know what or where is the
dantien in the human body, let me suggest several useful internet
websites:
http://www.edithchanacupuncture.com/
http://www.dan-tien.com/
http://www.cn939.com/en/tcm-article-read.php?id=1434
Briefly, the dantien is “in Qi Gong terms, having energy in
the center of the body. The center is called Dan Tian, which
means “elixir field” and a place to store energy. Think of the Dan
Tian as a reservoir and a place of inner strength. The Dan Tian,
located in the lower abdomen between the navel and the pubic
bone, corresponds to the physical functions of digestion,
elimination, and reproduction… it functions by giving us a sense
of stability and balance. It is also a source of power for physical
energy, sexual vitality, and inner power“ (Lee Holden,
www.acufinder.com/
Acupuncture+Information/Detail/Dan+Tian+Breathing+Connecti
ng+to+the+ Center).
I hope this helps.

172
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

4
At this juncture, we add the generation of a visual POV to the
internal mix. In the second activity (opening the cells to the
vacuum), the relaxation regime already made alpha, theta and
delta regimes prevalent in just about every section of the cortical
hemispheres. The operator’s self-training in hemispheric
synchronization comes in handy now, making possible for
him/her to procure a visual POV by vector intention. While in
theta-delta range occipitally (in back of the head) and frontally
(forehead), the regime is quite conducive and sensitive to one’s
vector-intention. But the trick is to not push it by inserting any
sort of effort into the mix. Effort of any kind means tension,
stress, and an instantaneous change in bioelectric cortico-
hemispheric regimes. Therefore, it is quite necessary to train
one’s nervous system to perform this transition by simultaneous
gentle vector-intention prodding and surrender to previous
training with Hemi-Synch binaural sounds. In ALL cases with
the groups of research fellows mentioned earlier, this
combination produced the needed and much sought-after
transition to visual point-of-view-manifest effortlessly.
The manifestation of a visual POV is the initialization of the
process of bringing the image of the targeted object before the
operator’s mind’s eye. To learn to transition in this stage from
an inability to generate a visual POV when needed to a state that
makes the resulting visual POV, we highly recommend the
Monroe Institute’s MIND FOOD CDs as means to acquiring
psychophysiologies that make possible the ability to strategically
generate a visual POV without ever using a verbal cue.
Generating a visual POV is just the initialization; the object of
doing so is to now place the image of the targeted object in the
midst of this visual point of view. This, too, will require some
internal learning, not difficult at all, but something that requires
concerted intention and practical application of the 1 => 2
strategy to (1) generate a visual POV, and (2) learn to visualize
and place the target object’s image in the POV.
Once the target’s image in the POV, we now can extend
awareness to the next act in the series.

173
A. R. BORDON

5
Activities 4 and 5 go hand-in-glove. Once the visualization of
the target’s image is at hand and the image is placed in the
location envisaged by the operator before starting, the operator
can then “lock on target.” In other words, the operator examines
every visual inch of the object and then stills the image as if he
were making a 3-D photo of the object. And now, he/she keeps
visual attention centered on the object’s image and deploys
kinesthetic attention (combination of body-sense and internal
sounds) to the waveguide, the “ride” needed, for the
sonobioelectrogravitic migration of energy from the vacuum-
plenum into spacetime. The “carrier” is, of course, sound.
Without the presence of sound, matter would not be able to form.
The operator’s shift to the body is to alert and engage all cells
to start their infrared signaling to establish an open cone to the
vacuum/plenum and open to the plenum all the information now
within him/her, such that the vacuum can “know’ the templaic
conformation of the object it must provide encoding energetics
when the demand instant is expressed. In other words, then the
operator expresses the energy from the vacuum through his/her
cells into the object’s matrix. But to accomplish it, the ‘sound of
creation” must play.

6
The “sounds of creation” may be generated in various,
ingenious ways, besides simply humming them. The most direct
way of getting this important element into the mix is, of course,
by humming the sounds. For those who are tone deaf, it would
then become necessary to generate and delivery the sound set
internally by electronic means. The one that has worked best for
the people in the groups with tone difficulties was bone
conduction means; in other words, we instructed them on how to
make their own “bonephones” instead of “earphones.” I am sure
that this would not represent an insurmountable problem for any
determined reader. Materials are available in electronic stores

174
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

and through specialty electronics websites for purchase, that can


be used as sound delivery means coupled to a sound player,
audiocassette or audio CD. The tricks are to assemble it all
together in a portable configuration, such that the audio delivery
part can be worn under one’s clothes, over the collar bone or
some other large bone of the body without difficulties or
distraction. The sound player element could, of course, be hand
carried, worn on the belt, or carried in an inside jacket pocket.
The key is to have a delivery system that is portable and useful
under most conditions.
What sound then will the operator be either humming or
playing on this portable bone-conduction sound delivery system?
The most common and one of the most effective “creation
sounds” is the tetragrammaton Y.H.W.H. converted into a string
of sounds, much like the catchy coda used in the film Close
Encounters composed of five sounds. In this case, the
tetragrammaton we suggest is a sequence of four sounds pegged
to the sound equivalents of the four Hebrew letters Yod (Y), H
(Heh), Yod (Y), Vav (W) in sequence. Be aware that some of
these letter actually represent a range of sounds; that is, they are
not single frequency sound, but rather a frequency range,
technically speaking. In each of the letter that is a frequency
range, ALL of the frequencies must be included in the composite
sound. The best thing to do is to take the frequencies and make
an audio sequence of the four sounds repeated in the self-same
cadence used by the Close Encounters coda, because it is not
anyone of the four sounds that is responsible for the expected
effect: instead is the four of them played in a continuous,
engaging, soulful and inspiring sequence of no less than 5
minutes in length. Use a sound synthesizer to make it. Or have
someone who is musically trained and familiar with a synthesizer
make it for you. But insist that all frequencies in each of the
ranges be present and included in the sound array for that
letter/sound. In this element, detail matter more than most people
realize. Just as most occultist don’t realize how much on key
their notion of alchemical formulas of transmutation are
concerning these letters converted into sound. Please use the
values listed below.

175
A. R. BORDON

Letter Y H W H
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hebrew Yo Heh Vav Heh
Range 554 Hz 417 to 392 to 417 to
432 Hz 396 Hz 432 Hz

7
And whether the sound is hummed or played on a synthesizer
matters little if the operator loses track of the internal kingdom
composed of the Kundalini energy stored in his/her thoracic and
ventral cavities, the visualized image of the target object, and the
catchy sound of the tetragrammaton all at the same time,
simultaneously and unabated. But if he or she maintained the
faith and kept the mind on all the balls up in the air, the moment
of reward nears. And the moment is the moment we chose to call
the adrenorgasmic burst.
The adrenorgasmic burst necessary is quasi-orgasmic In that
it begins at the Dantien between the hip bones and the pubic
bone and travels up the spine, over the head and when it reaches
the belly, the burst emanates from the forehead, the heart area,
and the belly simultaneously, making the energy stored become
the waveguide for the cells to transfer plenum energetics to the
spacetime location visualized in the operator’s POV – whether it
be the table in front, across the street, in the next room, or in
his/her hands matters not. The force of the burst needs to be at
the power level experienced in a great sexual orgasm and then
multiplied by a million.
To achieve this level of power, it is necessary to train the
body to acquire, store and sustain energetics that can be burst-
extruded on voiceless, wordless command. To train our research
fellows, we used a specialized Kundalini experience devised to
allow the group members to bend spoons and through biokinetic
entanglement move pieces of paper on a table, just to gain the

176
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

confidence that their energetics were at the level necessary to


meet the adrenorgasmic burst extrusion force requirement.

θθθ

So here it is. This is the simple algorithm used to produce


LEOM. It will seem complicated at the start, because there are
elements that require prior psychophysiologic proficiency. But
all the pieces are here, and they are in the right order and
requisite performance levels. What the reader does with the
information is very much a personal, intimate choice. May it
serve you well.

8.7. Practicum
Achievement of the first LEOM instant is actually more a
matter of practice and perseverance than luck or self-castigation.
As stated at the outset, belief does not enter anywhere in the
performance of the algorithm, unless one simply cannot handle
the cognitive consequences of actually performing LEOM. These
are the key reasons for the next piece in the puzzle: a practicum
wherein the operator learns to live with the idea, the performance
levels by approximation and the final achievement of the goal.
A practicum is a practice period of time at a chosen place. It
is a conscious activity brought under the control of one’s vector-
intention. It is a choice and the consequence of its performance
as chosen as well as of the product(s) derived from it. It also
means you perform a practicum, and the performance of the
practicum is the medium of the object of the practicum – much
like as if the practicum were the carrier wave of another (the

177
A. R. BORDON

performance of the LEOM of an MPO) piggybacking on it.


Establishing PRACTICUM as a LEOM ritual trains your
biomind and organism to respond to the demand of performing
LEOM of a chosen object need anywhere, anytime. It is strongly
suggested to you that you adopt PRACTICUM as your private,
intimate ritual to LEOM a chosen target that fits your MPO –
your reality.

8.8. Finally
We come to the end of our part in your process. The
information is now in your hands. What are you going to do with
it? And what ethical and legal questions will you be facing in
your choice of targets and desires can only be faced by the
choices you make. And, as you may have already surmised,
much of what you have already read here have other applications
as well, just as LEOM is not just an on-demand phenomenon but
actually the basis of our creation of our individual and collective
reality.
LEOM, as an on-demand phenomenon, is as ancient as the
time when the perfect DNA appeared in 4-spacetime, and began
the panspermia of the universe. Human science at the start of the
21st century of the Common Era is at a threshold beyond its own
conception. We are as gifted as any other life form in the known
universe, more than some and less than others according to our
stage of biomind evolvement at this juncture of our common
history. We are also coming into our own, and the means to do
so are at hand. TIA, LERM, MPO and other technologies that
combine internal and external requisites and requirement assists
are part of an ancient patrimony that is not even native to this
galaxy. Yet we have it and we are beginning to sample its gifts
and goodies.

178
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

9
ABOUT LEARNING TO DO LEOM

IN THIS FINAL PART of the briefing book, I am going to


make a case for learning LEOM responsibly, (1) whether you
learn it with a responsible trainer/guide or (2) by yourself.

9.1. Training with a Trainer/guide

I am sure that, once this book makes it into the public


domain, there will be “experts” springing up all over the world,
with various and sundry claims of success at doing LEOM by
using a psychophysiology prompted by the algorithm presented
here. This does not a trainer make. There is much, much more
to LEOM than meets the eye. It is indeed a fine aspect of
creation itself, and can well be regarded as the shadow of God, as
has been referred to elsewhere and elsewhen. Short of complete
disclosure, the only available framework in which to understand
LEOM/LERM/MPO is life physics.
Above and beyond that, there is the responsibility of he or
she who trains another to realize that these are skills to be needed
in the next seven score (70 years) and beyond. Those who take
up LEOM to use in daily life must also come to grips with the
responsibilities of using the skill and understanding its potential
and real consequences, when used without common sense and
with sheer arrogance. Being able to “do it” does not mean one
may “do it” for show, for the fun of it, for boasting or impressing
others, etc. As one trainee recently expressed its actual and real
usefulness in life, LEOM is and will become in his life a quality
of life skill to be used quietly, without fanfare, a means of
generating a good job, resources with which to pay the bills and
put food on the table, actually manifesting natural food items
without noxious contents (e.g., heavy metals, petroleum
byproducts and pesticides), learning to live skillfully when
making use of LEOM as a quality of life method of meeting
needs (personal and familial), etc.

179
A. R. BORDON

One of the anticipated responses to the public availability of


LEOM is greed. Yet, LEOM is the last advisable means of
configuring and synchronizing the manifestation of money of
any kind of currency. It is not impossible to do, but it is highly
unadvisable. There are many measures taken by central banks
around the world to make extremely difficult, if not impossible,
the replication of their currencies. The same applies to the dollar
in the United States. LEOM is, therefore, not a get rich quick
means, least of all a method, and certainly not a viable pathway.
What makes it near impossible is the availability of information
from which to make an information set possible. The same
applies to human inventions as products which are tied to
tracking and accountability methods, e.g., cars and VINs, money
and serial numbers and magnetic strips, and lottery tickets sold at
lottery outlets and convenience stores.
There are many other examples of such items, and it would
be sheer stupidity to tangle with a constituted tracking and
accountability system. Herein is the value of the statement made
in the previous chapter – QIS everything, and abide by the
viability rule.
Learning to LEOM is actually a feedback-intensive process:
internally as well as from a qualified trainer/guide external to
you, the learner. If this was the times of the Third Divine
Dynasty in Egypt and your were an initiate in the Major and
Minor mysteries in the school for priests serving Lord
Ningishzidda, second divine pharaoh, you would learn from one
of his high priests and the feedback would be intensive. The
Major Mysteries would also include much of what we pass onto
our Research Fellows as physics, biophysics, life physics,
biochemistry, biogenetics, astronomy, astrophysics, bioelectric-
bioenergetic medicine, and exobiology. But these are modern
times. Yet the approach we take is very much the same as we
would use in teaching anyone else how to LEOM: developing
and educating the CNS/enteric brain-mind to learn about and
together learn to grasp phenomena described, such that the
learning would be highly integrated into the learner’s biomind.
We do somewhat of the same thing with people we train to use

180
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

LEOM for applications in specific research contexts: they learn


to LEOM in the context of life physics.
We don’t separate or segregate sciences one from another.
Instead, the learning is integrated, but sufficiently specific to
grasp and understand and internalize information into the
biomind. To us, LEOMing involves not just knowledge about,
but also participation of all parts of the nervous system, the
enteromyofascial complex and ALL the cells, the energetic
anatomy of the human body (i.e., what Chinese medicine teaches
as the meridians of the body), and an integration of mind, body
and environment (planetary, star system, even galactic) in the
utilization of energy for matter synchronization. So beware of
someone who claims to have the pattern down pat, and the claim
to have LEOMed objects.

9.2. Training with yourself

Learning to LEOM by oneself may take a long time. I have


no way of even estimating how long, as it would literally be a
trial and error process. Not everyone is enough of a scientist-
observer to adopt a posture and procedures that, with patience,
could conceivably lead to eventual results. Teaching oneself to
LEOM is neither a trial and error process nor one in which one
proceeds by approximation through elimination of what not to
do. It is not a linear process and does not involve an equally
linear procedure, as the discussion in the previous chapter on
using the algorithm would indicate.
Then there is the need for feedback and correction in process
and procedures used internally. Reading the last chapter’s
description of the algorithm is one thing; it is quite another to
implement by operationalizing internally what one reads in it.
Therein lies the problems – in the practical details. It is thus little
wonder that no one has heard of spontaneous LEOMing of
objects, except in the Bible and on discussions and interviews
with Jamisson Neruda, former member of the Labyrinth group.
Yet, I suspect that the greatest number of people interested in
LEOM and LERM will opt for learning by their own means,
their own initiative and from personal interpretation of materials

181
A. R. BORDON

presented in this Briefing Book. This is a briefing book, not a


guidebook or a how-to book.
Therefore, I cannot warrant and assure you that you will
produce LEOM from reading the pages of this book. However,
knowing what you have read on these pages will bring you closer
to the goal – of that I am sure. Going at it alone is quite daunting,
and yet, Thomas Edison failed 2,999 times in producing a viable
light bulb. On the 3000th time, he succeeded, Edison had a plan,
went about testing his process and changing procedures
accordingly, until he succeeded. Is it possible to LEOM on one’s
own initiative, using the information garnered through these
pages. Nothing says it is impossible. But I will repeat the
warning: it is a most daunting task.
As a quality of life set of skills, there are ethical, logistic, and
practical considerations to take into account when using LEOM.
These were not examined in this Briefing Book, as they are
beyond the scope of the briefing itself. Some of them have been
hinted at on the previous chapter. However, it is neither
sufficient nor comprehensive enough to get a clear idea of the
problems, limitations and ethical dilemmas encountered by
people who now have mastered the skills to make LEOM
happen. These issues are projected to become an essay,
monograph or short book to be written in the future. Written it
must be, as there are going to be people who will proceed
onward alone and by one’s own bootstraps.
To one and all, therefore, we wish you the best and the ability
to discern when to, how to, and when not to use what you learn
here.

182
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

10
NOTES

The author, along with several other members of the


development team, were able to reproduce and amplify the
Russian results in April, 2001, using two synchronized SQUIDs,
one in northern California and the other in the outskirts of
Atlanta, Georgia. Two men who did not know each other were
placed inside the modified SQUIDs and were asked to undergo a
series of interface (distance biophysical contact) procedures over
a period of two hours. One of them, a neurosensor from our
team, able to remote influence, was able to put the man in
Atlanta in a mild trance and performed simple parlor procedures
with him. We were gratified at the results in that the Russian data
could be reproduced without much difficulty, and at the same
time disturbed at the ease with which distance influence could be
performed under tech-assist conditions. What means of
protection could the world and its inhabitants have from
unrestrained use of such invasive means of control? We, and
others as well, have developed means of preventing such
invasive interventions.

1. Levichev’s first article is dedicated mostly to the conformal


compactification M0 of the Minkowski world M0 and its
universal coverings; in it he goes into the general definitions
specifying space-times and causality. In the second, he sings
praises to Segal’s accomplishments in terms of special relativity.

2. The well-known result by A. D. Alexandrov, later


rediscovered in a weaker version by E. C. Zeeman, originated the
method of deriving the geometry from the causal structure. The
usage of P instead of the standard 10-dimensional P0 is
motivated by this very method when applied to M0. It is worth
noting that matters are quite different with the symmetry group
of the Newtonian world: there are many transformations of N

183
A. R. BORDON

which preserve the causal structure even though they do not


belong to S.

3. In the performance of gnosive work with nature of a cognitive-


associative and emotive characteristics, the need for language
becomes often superfluous and at worst, insufficient. We have to
invent other means of tangenting (here is a noun that now is
required that we convert it into a verb and adverbial form
because of the concept it embodies which we need to turn into
active descriptor of action taken by an observer) an event or
phenomenon by observership (the class designation of a specific
noun changed to its highest level of abstraction). These two
words showcase the phenomenon we encountered wherein the
need for new terminology arose as a means of capturing meaning
and the meaning of these new meanings. We share, Dominic and
I, Umberto Eco’s fascination with the work of C. K. Ogden and
I. A. Richards in the study of the influence of language on
though and the science of symbolism (specifically, see [19]).
“Throughout almost all of our lives,” write Ogden and Richards,
pages 50 and 51, “we are treating things as signs. All experience,
using the word in the widest possible sense, is either enjoyed or
interpreted (i.e., treated as a sign) or both, and very little of it
escapes some degree of interpretation. An account of the process
of interpretation is thus the key to the understanding of the Sign-
situation, and therefore the beginning of wisdom. It is
astonishing that although the need for such an account has long
been a commonplace in psychology, those concerned with the
criticism and organization of our knowledge have with few
exceptions entirely ignored the consequences of its neglect.”
Ogden and Richards write with a kind of fervor Eco calls
“therapeutic fallacy.” He derives this from a series of correct and
inevitable consideration, including, (a) that we often use words
with confused and ambiguous meanings, and from this ambiguity
some accidents can and do result; (b) many of these could be
avoided if we fixed with some absoluteness the precision of the
span of meaning given to a term used. This is a requirement in
mathematics that physicists often pay heed with a superior
benevolence but ignore in practice, especially now that

184
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

subquantum physics is mushrooming out of its riverbed.


Everyone is attempting to say the same things in fifteen different
language registers, even when alluding to mathematical objects
which themselves are being stretched out of causeway as well
(see the works of retired professor from the Naval Academy,
Robert A. Herrmann, who had taught higher math at Annapolis) (
www.serve.com/herrmann/main.html). Thus, this is showing us
that idiomaterial physicists and biophysicists need, per force, be
linguists first, and linguists of a very high caliber. Much depends
on that.

4. These are internal methods of mental activity based on


specific psychophysiologies a user must learn and acquire before
implementing its use internally. The basis of TopoThink is a
combination of free-standing (or soft-, non-technology assisted)
neurosensing strategy coupled to fluid topological thinking
strategy. When a TopoThink user approaches an information set,
s/he is out to sketch out a “picture” or “conceptual framework”
dense with meaning. To approach an information set using
TopoThink, the user has to use what is known as topological
thinking. In other words, the user makes contact with a very
fluid, formless, often nonhierarchical information set from which
s/he must derive sensorial information from which then can be
extracted concrete information that can be abstracted as direct
knowledge of elements within the set. The information in the set
has its own topology (or elastic interconnection between what is
in it that the user or percipient interfaces with). Information sets
are always dynamic; that is, they are dense with meaning, which
is what the user-percipient is out to extract. However, as dynamic
as they are, they can also either be self-contained (i.e., they have
perceivable, identifiable boundaries, as in a human being as the
target) or they may be fluid situations (i.e., they may actually be
a flow of constantly changing information in the stream itself, as
in a conversation or constantly changing condition of the
information stream).
Neurolinguistic Registry, NLR, on the other hand, is a
nonverbal strategy that relies on the perception, decoding,
deciphering, and registering of biological, biomagnetic,

185
A. R. BORDON

bioelectro-magnetic, magnetic, electromagnetic, sonoelectro-


gravitic, and sonobioelectrogravitic signatures associated with
objects in nature that are the focus of a heuristic investigation on
the part of a technology-assisted neurosensor or soft-neurosensor
(non-technology assisted). The mastery of NLR allows a
practitioner to recognize (detect), decode (nonverbally analyze,
study, and store), decipher (recall and remember) the signature of
viruses, bacteria, molds, microscopic processes, subquantum
processes, and other energetic phenomena with recognizable
signatures.

5. The motion of chaotic oscillators cannot be uniquely


parametrized by the phase in contrast to classical oscillators;
however, the phase variable suffices for the determination of the
location and charge of a topological defect in the spatially-
distributed medium.

6. Point topological defects in two-dimensional homogeneous


oscillatory media are associated with the appearance of spiral
waves. The phase field φ(r, t) of a medium with a spiral wave
contains a point topological phase defect in the spiral core.

7. Interestingly enough, there isn’t anything in the gnosive


evidence that indicates a human observer (or any other biological
entity on Earth) is an event- cause wherein light-encoding of
matter arranged hologrammatically. Instead, all of our gnosive
data strongly suggests a human COBE’s observership is a
systematic co-participation in the event-causation by way of its
biological interface with time-energy as space- and time-regimes
that use subquantum energy as source of sustenance. An
emerging model of the phenomenon indicates that all observers,
complex and less than complex, participate in an energetic
voluminization of matter as space-dimensional objects in a
continually voluminizing branes of space fed by a ubiquitous
source – the energy of time as subquantum energy. At least, this
is what the gnosive evidence suggests. We are not yet sure these
are the mechanisms by which the dynamics describe manifest. So

186
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

we are treating all of it as heuristics for further, continuing


gnosive examination.

8. However, in the unisonic, the flatland fragmental glimmer


surfaces vibrate not just as electromagnetic waves, but also the
medium is different. It allows for the vibrational energy to
manifest in a medium much more fluid than that of either region
media, such that its vibratory rate is not only sensed as EM
energy of extremely high frequency (unlike anything on Earth),
but also as a manifestation we interpreted as sound.

9. Neurosensors have been able to detect this phenomenon


expressed as such under both field conditions (e.g., when a target
individual is being examined gnosively while undergoing single
degree of freedom compact Meissner at MAM effect moment).
10. Just how does this happen, we have yet to discern patterns by
gnosive observation in real time.

11. Research Fellow J.W. Barber (his work name) reported to the
senior author in 1999 that he had known and befriended a
Russian informant from the Moscow region, a former Russian
Spetsnaz with Afghanistan experience, who had been trained as a
remote influence officer at a site in Kazakhstan, and who had
also been taught to LERM/VEEOM, as well as use VEEOM for
tissue recovery, recuperation, and reconstitution purposes. These
applications were said by the informant to aimed exclusively at
field interventions designed to reconstitute tissue in wounded
personnel in the least amount of time possible.

12. Lopatin, V. and V. Cygankov, in 1999, published a most


descriptive book, Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of
Russia. (SINTEG, Moscow, Russian Federation). In Chapter 3
(biophysical principles of psychotronic weapons), they wrote:
"Unexcited physical vacuum represents a quasi-crystal composed
of firmly packed spherical particles - fitons, having two
compensated spins directed in the opposite direction and for that
matter absolutely neutral in the outside space. Birth or
materialization (according to Yuzvishin) of electric, gravitational

187
A. R. BORDON

or spin-torsion fields and particles - this is charging (E), spin-


longitudinal or gravitational (G) and spin transverse torsion (S),
SL-left or SR-right, polarization of physical vacuum, or
modulation (excitation) of neutral state of fitons. Three modes
of fields take birth: E-field, electric field and charge q, G-field,
gravitational field and gravitation or inert mass m and S-field,
spin-torsion field with two, SL and SR, varieties. From here
takes its title the EGS of A. E. Akimov (p. 44).
In the neurocomputer "EMBRION" there are three basic, cyclic,
rotating electronic processes which may act as generators of
torsion fields. "We will suppose that the events in
neurocomputers (NC) take place in the space of events of the
physical vacuum and that the geometry of the absolute
parallelism corresponds to them (geometry A4). Theoretical
works appeared, confirming the reality of PSI-phenomena, the
existence of so called torsion component in the right part of of
the gravitational equation by Albert Einstein, and the
construction of technical models of the torsion fields radiation
generators is reported in some works

13. The history of mind control at a distance, remote mind


control technology (RMCT) begins in America with the research
of Dr Ross Adey and his colleagues in the late '60's, working on
the CIA-funded Pandora Project. Adey found that ELF
(extremely low frequency) signals on the region of 1-20 Hz (with
0.1 increments having different effects), had bioactive and
psychoactive effects. The research was important to the
intelligence agencies, since for they wished to find frequencies
which could mind control humans from a distance (RMCT).
Pandora researchers discovered that the 6-16 Hz region had
drastic effects on brain and on nervous and endocrinal systems.
This could enable major dysfunction in the target victim if
research on cats and monkeys could be duplicated - the research
on human victims still remains classified.

14. Any reader can contact either one of us to obtain a copy of


the standard tetragrammaton and the Ra system tetragrammaton
for personal use in connection with the reader’s personal

188
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

research of the information presented in this monograph. Please


send requests to either arbordon@lifephysicsgroup.org, or to
dhhasler@lifephysicsgroup.org. There is no charge for the files.
15. We have also used a complex pattern of motor functions,
sensory, affective and cognitive-hermeneutic symptoms called
the Kundalini Syndrome to achieve results. This psychosomatic
arousal and excitation occurs in connection with momentary but
intensive contemplative practice (such as short burst relaxation to
theta and delta levels, along with visualization of the desired
object), which does constitute an intense life experience for any
operator/practitioner. We have now established some common
criteria in order to describe this condition, of which the most
prominent feature is a feeling of energy travelling along the
spine, or progressing upwards in the body. Motor symptoms are
said to include tremors, other spontaneous or involuntary body
movements and changes in respiratory function.

189
A. R. BORDON

11
REFERENCES

1. Bordon, A. R. Biophysical-bioenergetic basis for vector-


intentional interface biocommunication in 4-spacetime: BEAM
(bioelectronic applied mental) functioning as a Meissner field
capable of a polychromatic quantum-resonant-like mobile point-
of-view. Foundation Reports in Life Physics 1, 1, 22-36,
2004(a).
2. Levichev, A. V. On mathematical foundations and
physical applications of chronometry. In Hofmann, Lawson, and
Vinberg, eds., Semigroups in Algebra, Geometry and Analysis.
Walter de Gruyter and Co, 1995, 77-103.
3. Levichev, A. V. Chronometric theory by I.Segal is the
accomplishment of special relativity, Izvestia VUZov. Fizika 36
(1993), 84{89.
4. Pearle, P. Collapse models. arXiv:quant-ph/9901077 v1 29
Jan 1999, page 1. Also published in Open Systems and
Measurement in Relativistic Quantum Theory, F. Petruccione
and H.P. Breuer eds. (Springer Verlag, 1999).
5. Bordon, A. R. and Wienz, E. M. The Unum as a natural
system. Idiomaterial Unum-Universe Series, LPG-C Technical
essays and Monographs, 2006.
6. Herrmann, R. A. The existence of ultimate concepts. 20 July
2008.
7. Bordon, A. R., D. H. Hasler, J. A. Sanchez, F. M. Maye, and
R. B. Solingen (2009). Biogeo-systemics: I. The
Sonobioelectronic and Sonobioelectrogravitic Nature of Life on
Earth And Why Pilot-wave Subquantum Mechanics and
Information Is Not Enough. LPG-C Technical Essays &
Mongraphs, 2009. (Idiomaterial Unum-Universe Series).
8. A. R. Bordon, R. B. Solingen, E. M. Wienz, & J. T. Traveler.
Beyond the Priore Effect: An exploration of issues toward a
model of human longevity in a subquantum, bioelectromagnetic
and sonobioelectrogravitic theoretical framework for the

190
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

maintenance of long-term organismic integrity. Life Physics


Group – California, LPG-C-08/NRG1054, October 2008.
9. Bordon, A. R. (2009a) Biogeosystemics: II. Life on Earth by
interspecies biocommunicative interaction and COBEs’ interface
as an aspect of the Over-Function/Tautologic Refractivity
phenomenon. LPG-C Technical Essays & Monographs, 2009.
(Idiomaterial Unum-Universe Series, April 2009).
10. Bordon, A. R. (2009b) Idiomaterial Universe 1: The UNUM
as Monoidal Category of Objects and Morphisms as Continuum
Multileveled Manifold – A Work in Progress of the Needed
Mathematics and Problems Ahead. LPG-C Technical Essays &
Monographs, 2009. (Idiomaterial Unum-Universe Series, 2nd
edition May 2004, reedited July 2009).
11. Bordon, A. R. & Wienz, E. M. (2006) The UNUM as a
natural system. LPG-C Technical Essays & Monographs, 2009.
(Idiomaterial Unum-Universe Series, July 2006).
12. Bordon, A. R., J. A. Sanchez, F. M. Maye, E. M. Wienz, J. J.
Jones, R. B. Solingen and J. T. Traveler (2009). Idiomaterial
Universe 2: The UNUM as Form-Design Continuum in the Inner
UNUM’s Condensate Region. – A Monograph. LPG-C
Technical Essays & Monographs, 2009. (Idiomaterial Unum-
Universe Series, August 2009).
13. Bordon, A. R. & Wienz, E. M. (2009). How the Life Physics
Group – California Came About. LPG-C Technical Essays &
Monographs, 2009. (Idiomaterial Unum-Universe Series,
September 2009).
14. Bordon, A. R. Life physics of ultimate causation: A research
program using bioelectronic applied mental interfacing in 4-
spacetime by an integrated human biomind/biotuner. Foundation
Reports in Life Physics 1, 1, 2004(a).
15. Bordon, A. R. PQR (polychromatic quantum resonant-like)
Meissner fields and the plenum engineering of coherent and
mobile virtual dense forms in orthogonal spacetimes.
Foundation Reports in Life Physics 1, 2004(c).
16. Bordon, A. R. Ultimate causation (T-boundary) as causal
sui-genesis of all superdomains, including 4-spacetime.
Foundation Reports in Life Physics 1, 60-108, 2004(d).

191
A. R. BORDON

17. Notices of the American Mathematical Society. 2008.


55(7)(August):833-834.
18. Bordon, A. R. TopoThink: How to combine extension
neurosensing and topological thinking to access any local and
nonlocal/nonlinear information set. LPG-C/COIAST, January
2008.
19. Ogden, C. K. and I. A. Richards. The meaning of meaning,
a study of the influence of language upon thought and of the
science of symbolism. San Diego, CA, Harvest/Harcourt Brace
Jovanovich, 1923.
20. Baez, J. C. & Stay, M. Physics, Topology, Logic and
Computation: A Rosetta Stone. March 15, 2008.
21. Bordon, A. R., D. H. Hasler, J. A. Sanchez, F. M. Maye, and
R. B. Solingen (2009). Biogeo-systemics: I. The
Sonobioelectronic and Sonobioelectrogravitic Nature of Life on
Earth And Why Pilot-wave Subquantum Mechanics and
Information Is Not Enough. LPG-C Technical Essays &
Monographs, 2009. (Idiomaterial Unum-Universe Series),
March 2009.
22. A. R. Bordon, R. B. Solingen, E. M. Wienz, & J. T. Traveler.
Beyond the Priore Effect: An exploration of issues toward a
model of human longevity in a subquantum, bioelectromagnetic
and sonobioelectrogravitic theoretical framework for the
maintenance of long-term organismic integrity. Life Physics
Group – California, LPG-C-08/NRG1054, October 2008.
23. A. R. Bordon, E. M. Wienz, and R. B. Solingen. An
examination of the Priore effect in the induction of broad
backaction cascades across all time-space regimes in living
tissue: The use of low-powered non-ionizing and ionizing
energetics (light, sound and EM) for the promotion of human
tissue complete pristine reconforming recovery. Life Physics
Group – California, LPG-C-05/NRG1022, January 2005.
24. Sanchez, J.A., Bordon, A. R., Solingen, R. B. and Wienz, E.
M. Induction of a micro-singularity in an electrically charged
environment to incite macrobleed of vacuum-plenum virtual
electromagnetic activity as wraithlike network of visible bio-
luminescent filaments, detectable and measurable in real time by
instrumentable means and gnosive neurosensors. LPG-C, 2009.

192
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

25. Bordon, A.R., Solingen, R.B., Traveler, J.T. & J.A. Sanchez.
Sonobioelectronic interventions based upon Ra and standard
sound systems: Comparisons of instrumental manifest production
observership of health conditions in healthy and nonhealthy
small N groups. LPG-C, 2003.
26. Bordon, A. R. PQR (polychromatic quantum resonant-like)
Meissner fields and the plenum engineering of coherent and
mobile virtual dense forms in orthogonal spacetimes.
Foundation Reports in Life Physics 1, 2004(c).
27. Bordon, A. R., R. N. Boyd, and A. Klein. The Coming
Longevitality Of The EARTH Human COBE Biomind.
Foundation Books Online, 2009.
28. Pikovsky, A. S., M. G. Rosenblum, G. V. Osipov, and J.
Kurths, Physica D 104, 219 (1997).
29. Josi´c, K. and D. J. Mar, Phys. Rev. E 64, 056234 (2001).
29. A. S. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths.
Synchronization: A universal concept in nonlinear science
(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2001).
30. Rosenblum, M., A. S. Pikovsky, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev.
Lett. 76, 1804 (1996).
31. Pikovsky, A. S., M. G. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, Europhys.
Lett. 34, 165 (1996).
32. Liu, Z., Y.-C. Lai, and F. Hoppensteadt, Phys. Rev. E 63,
055201 (2001).
33. Zhang, Y., G. Hu, and H. A. Cerdeira, Phys. Rev. E 64,
037203 (2001).
34. Valladares, D. L., S. Boccaletti, F. Feudel, and J. Kurths,
Phys. Rev. E 65, 055208 (2002)..
35. Z. Zheng, G. Hu, and B. Hu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5318
(1998).
36. Davidsen, J. and R. Kapral. Phase synchronization and
topological defects in inhomogeneous media. arXiv:cond-
mat/0207619v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 25 Jul 2002.
37. Goryachev, A., R. Kapral, and H. Chat´e, Int. J. Bif. Chaos
10, 1537 (2000).
38. Zhou, C. and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. E 65, 040101 (2002).

193
A. R. BORDON

39. Kozyrev, N. A. Possibility of experimental study of


properties of time. Unpublished paper. Pulkovo, former U.S.S.R.,
September 1967. Original paper in Russian, translated by LPG-C
members.
40. Calvet, C. The Background Field Theory. Journal of
Theoretics 1, 5, Dec 1999/Jan 2000a.
41. Calvet, C. Effects and Evidence of the Background Field.
Journal of Theoretics 2,.4, Aug 2000b.
42. Calvet, C. Detection and Origin of the Background Field.
Journal of Theoretics 2, 4, Aug 2000c.
43. Calvet, C. Evidence for the Existence of 5 Real Spatial
Dimensions in Quantum Vacuum - Scale of Quantum
Temperatures Below Zero Kelvin. Journal of Theoretics 3,.1, Feb.
2001.
44. Calvet, C. Gravitation and inertia as a consequence of
Quantum Vacuum Energy. Journal of Theoretics 4, 2, April
2002a.
45. Calvet, C. About the quantum vacuum lepton/photon ratio.
Journal of Theoretics 4, 2, April 2002b.
46. Puthoff, H. E. The Energetic Vacuum: Implications For
Energy Research. Speculations in Science and Technology 13,
4, 247-257 (1990).
47. Dyatlov, V. L. Polarization model of the inhomogeneous
physical vacuum. Institute of Mathematics Publishing House,
Novosibirsk, Siberia, 1998.
48. Shipov, G. I. Theory of Physical Vacuum. Moscow: NT-
Tsentr, 1993.
49. Prange, Richard E. and Peter Strance. The Semiconducting
Vacuum. Am. J. Phys. 52(1), 19-21, Jan. 1984.
50. Thomson, D. W. & Bourassa, J. D. Secrets of the ether.
http://www.16pi2.com/.
51. Allwein, G. A qualitative framework for Shannon
information theories. Proceedings of the 2004 workshop on New
security paradigms, Nova Scotia, Canada, 2004, 23 – 31.
52. C. H. Bennett and S. Wiesner. Communication via one- and
two-particle operators
on Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen states. Phys. Rev. Lett.,
69(20):2881-2884, 1992.

194
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

53. Hayden, P., D. Leung, and A. Winter. Aspects of generic


entanglement. arXiv:quant-ph/0407049.
54. Harrow, A., P. Hayden, and D. Leung. Superdense coding of
quantum states. arXiv quant-ph/0307221, 2003.
55. Abeyesinghe, A. Unification of quantum information theory.
Doctoral dissertation, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, California, 2004.
56. Holevo, A. S. The capacity of the quantum channel with
general signal states. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 44:269, 273,
1998.
57. Schumacher, B. and M. D. Westmoreland. Sending classical
information via noisy quantum channels. Phys. Rev. A,
56:131{138, 1997.
58. Bennett, C. H., P. W. Shor, J. A. Smolin, and A. V.
Thapliyal. Entanglement-assisted classical capacity of noisy
quantum channels. Phys. Rev. Lett., 83:3081, 1999.
arXiv.org:quant-ph/9904023.
59. Bennett, C. H., P. W. Shor, J. A. Smolin, and A. V.
Thapliyal. Entanglement-assisted capacity of a quantum channel
and the reverse Shannon theorem. IEEE Trans. Inf. Th.,
48(10):2637, 2002. arXiv.org:quant-ph/0106052.
60. Lloyd, S. Capacity of the noisy quantum channel. Phys. Rev.
A, 55:1613, 1996.
61. Shor, P. W. The quantum channel capacity and coherent
information. Lecture notes, MSRI workshop on quantum
computation, 2002. Available at
http://www.msri.org/publications/ln/msri/2002/quantumcrypto/sh
or/1/.
62. Devetak, I. The private classical capacity and quantum
capacity of a quantum channel. IEEE Trans. Inf. Th., 51(1):44,
2005. arXiv.org/0304127.
63. Devetak, I. and A. Winter. Distillation of secret key and
entanglement from quantum states. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A,
461:207-237, 2005. arXiv.org:quant-ph/0306078.
64. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, R. Horodecki, D. W. Leung,
and B. M. Terhal. Classical

195
A. R. BORDON

capacity of a noiseless quantum channel assisted by noisy


entanglement. Quant. Inf. Comp., 1:70-78, 2001.
arXiv.org:quant-ph/0106080.
65. Nielsen, M. A. and I. L. Chuang. Quantum computation
and quantum information.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
66. Harrow, A. W. Coherent communication of classical
messages. Phys. Rev. Lett., 92:097902, 2004. arXiv.org:quant-
ph/0307091.
67. Bennett, C. H., P. Hayden, D. Leung, P. W. Shor, and A.
Winter. Remote preparation of quantum states. arXiv quant-
ph/0307100, 2003.
68. Padmanabhan, T. Phys. Rep. 380, 235 (2005).
69. D. N. Spergel et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. 148, 175 (2003)
70. P. J. E. Peebles, B. Ratra, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 559 (2003)
71. E.J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa, Int. J. Mod.
Phys. D 15, 1753 (2006)
72. T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rep. 380, 235 (2005).
73. C. Beck, C.J. de Matos, The Dark Energy Scale in
Superconductors: Innovative Theoretical and Experimental
Concepts. arXiv:0709.2373v2 [gr-qc] 24 Apr 2008.
74. C. Beck, M. C. Mackey, Physica A 379, 101 (2007)
75. C. Beck, M. C. Mackey, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 17, 71 (2008)
[astro-ph/0703364]
76. C. J. de Matos, C. Beck, ”Possible measurable effects of dark
energy in rotating superconductors”, arXiv: 0707.1797.
77. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulis, G.R. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B
436, 257 (1998)
78. R. Tao, X. Zhang, X. Tang, P.W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. Lett.
83, 5575 (1999)
79. R. Tao, X. Xu, Y.C. Lan, Y. Shiroyanagi, Physica C 377, 357
(2002)
80. R. Tao, X. Xu, E. Amr, Physica C 398, 78 (2003).
81. Calvet, C. The Background Field Theory. Journal of
Theoretics 1, 5, Dec 1999/Jan 2000.
82. Dyatlov, V. L. Polarization model of the inhomogeneous
physical vacuum. Institute of Mathematics Publishing House,
Novosibirsk, Siberia, 1998.

196
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

83. Shipov, G. I. Psychophysical phenomena and the theory of


the physical vacuum. Collected Materials of the Scientific and
Practical Conference “Consciousness and the Physical World.”
Moscow, November 1996, 69-75.
84. Shipov, G. I. Theory of Physical Vacuum. Moscow: NT-
Tsentr, 1993.
85. Prange, Richard E. and Peter Strance. The Semiconducting
Vacuum. Am. J. Phys. 52(1), 19-21, Jan. 1984.
86. Terletskiy, Y. P. Paradoxes of the Theory of Relativity.
Moscow: Nauka, 1966.
87. Akimov, A. Ye., and V. Ya. Tarasenko. Models of
polarization states of the physical vacuum and torsion fields. Izd.
vuzov. Fizika 3, 13-23, 1992; A. Akimov, G. Shipov, "Torsion
Fields and Their Experimental Manifestations," Proc. Internat.
Conf. on New Ideas in Natural Sciences, St. Petersburg, June
1996, p. 221, see also: J. New Energy, vol 2, no 2, Summer 1997,
pp 67-84.
88. Bordon, A. R. Biogeosystemics: II. Life on Earth by
interspecies biocommunicative interaction and COBEs’ interface
as an aspect of the Over-Function/Tautologic Refractivity
phenomenon. LPG-C Technical Essays & Monographs, 2009.
(Idiomaterial Unum-Universe Series), March 2009.
89. Bordon, A. R., D. H. Hasler, J. A. Sanchez, F. M. Maye, and
R. B. Solingen (2009). Biogeo-systemics: I. The
Sonobioelectronic and Sonobioelectrogravitic Nature of Life on
Earth And Why Pilot-wave Subquantum Mechanics and
Information Is Not Enough. LPG-C Technical Essays &
Monographs, 2009. (Idiomaterial Unum-Universe Series, March
2009).
90. Bordon, A. R., E. M. Wien, and R. B. Solingen.
Biogeosystemics: Ten years of theory and measurements of the
energetics and processes that impinge upon life on Earth. LPG-
California, 2006.
91. Oschman, J. L. Energy medicine: The scientific basis.
Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 2000.
92. He., H. Z. et al. A “Stress Meter” assessment of the degree of
relaxation in Qigong vs. nonQigong meditation. Frontier

197
A. R. BORDON

Perspectives. The Center for Frontier Sciences at Temple


University. 8(1), 37-42, 1999.
93. Zhang, C. L. Standing wave, meridians and collaterals,
coherent electromagnetic field and holistic thinking in
Traditional Chinese Medicine. Journal of Yunnan College of
Traditional Medicine (I) 19(1), 27-30; (II) 19(2), 35-40, 1996.
(In Chinese, translated by LPG-C members.)
94. Zhang, C. L. et al (eds). Current developments in biophysics.
Hangzhou, Hangzhou University Press, 1996. (In English)
95. Zhang, C. L. et al. Statistics of body conductivity as index of
physiological state. Symposium of International Conference of
Non-Equilibrium and Coherent Systems in Biophysics, Biology
and Biotechnology, Bioinform Services 433-438, 1996. (In
English)
96. Zhang, C. L. Invisible rainbow and inaudible music: The
dissipative structure of electromagnetic fields in living systems.
Hangzhou, Hangzhou University Press, 2002. (In English)
97. Rein, G. Biological Effects of Quantum Fields and Their
Role in the Natural Healing Process. Frontier Perspectives 7, 16-
23, 1998.
98. Cope F.W. A review of the applications of solid state
physics concepts to biological systems. J Bio. Phys 3, 1, 1975.
99. DelGiudice E, S.Doglia, et al, Magnetic Flux Quantization
and Josephson Behavior in Living Systems. Physica Scripta 40,
786, 1989.
100. Hitchcock, S. M. Time and information. arXiv:quant-
ph/0012017v2, 4 Feb 2001.
101. Hitchcock, S. M. Is there a “Conservation of Information”
law for the universe? arXiv:gr-qc/0108010v2, 7 Aug 2001.
102. Larmor, J. J. Aether and matter. Cambridge, UK., 1900,
pp.162-193.
103. Gorbatsevich, F. F. The ether and the universe. St
Petersburg, Izdatel'stvo ALFA-SHTAMP, 2004.
104. Jackson, J.J., A. R. Bordon, and C. J. Colossimo-Jaime.
Applications in bending light around the Unum-universe. LPG-C
Technical Essays & Monographs, 2008.
105. Boyd, R. N. Personal communication, 2009.

198
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

106. Lopatin, V. and V. Cygankov. Psychotronic Weapon and


the Security of Russia. SINTEG, Moscow, Russian Federation,
1999.
107. Ross W Adey: Neurophysiologic Effects of Radiofrequency
and Microwave Radiation, Bulletin of the New York Academy
of Medicine, Vo1.55 No 1 1, Dec 1979; The Influences of
Impressed Electrical Fields at EEG Frequencies on Brain and
Behaviour, in Behaviour and Brain Electrical Activity, Burch, N
and Altshuler, H.I., eds, Plenum press, 1975; Effects of
Modulated Very High Frequency Fields on Specific Brain
Rhythms in Cats, Brain Research, Vol 58, 1973; Spectral
Analysis of Low Frequency Components in the Electrical
Activity of the Hippocampus During Learning,
Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol 23,
1967.
108. T. E. Bearden, Energy from the Vacuum: Concepts and
Principles, Cheniere Press, Santa Barbara, CA, 2002
109. Gariaev, P., Tertishny, G. and Leonova, K. The Wave:
Probabilistic and Linguistic
Representation of Cancer and HIV. Journal of Non-Locality and
Remote Mental Interactions (JNLRMI), 1,. 2, May 2002.
110. Gariaev P. et al. Wave based genome.
http://selfmanaging.net/genetica/engl.htm, 2002.
111. Gariaev P.et al. Holographic and quantum nonlocality of
genome. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on
Theoretical and Clinical Aspects of Using Bioresonance and
Multiresonance Therapy, Part II, "IMEDES", Moscow, pp 256-
272, 1999.
112. Gariaev P.P., Wave genetic code. M. Izdatcenter, 1997.
113. Agaltsov A.M., Gariaev P.P., Gorelik V.S., Rakhmatullayev
I.A., Tcheglov V.A. Double photon-induced luminescent lighting
in genetic structures. Quantum Electronics.23, N2. p.181-184,
1996.
114. Gariaev P.P. Wave genome. M. Obtch. Polza Press. 1994.
115. Sidorov, L and Chen, K. Biophysical mechanisms of genetic
regulation: is there a link to mind-body healing? Journal of
NonLocality and Remote Mental Interactions 4, 1, 2006.

199
A. R. BORDON

116. Einstein A., Podolsky B., Rosen N. Can quantum-


mechanical description of physical reality be considered
complete? Phys. Rev. 47, 777-780, 1935.
117. Atwater, F. The Monroe Institute’s Hemi-Sync Process, A
Theoretical Perspective. The Monroe Institute of Applied
Sciences, 1988. p. 4.
118. Bordon, A. R. Psychophysiologic LEOM algorithm. Life
Physics Group, 2010. Also see
http://www.lifephysicsgroup.org/index, and follow instructions
on the website to obtain a copy of the essay.
119. JongWon Yi, KwangYeon Rhee and SeongDae Kim.
Object-based encoding for multi-view sequences of 3D object.
Signal Processing: Image Communication 17, 3, 2002, 293-
304.
120. Bordon, A. R., Wienz, E. M., and Sanchez, J.A.
Biointerface of natural energetic systems and digital computation
energetics. IDEA Technical Reports, 2004.
121. Bordon, A. R., Sanchez, J. A., and Veeneman, S. Parametric
system integrity of operating networks: detection, maintenance
and restoration of discontinuity of operation by BIR application
to unauthorized access and network disruption. IDEA Technical
Reports, 1999.
122. Bordon, A. R., Wienz, E. M., and Sanchez, J.A.
Biointerface of natural energetic systems and digital computation
energetics. IDEA Technical Reports, 2004.
123. Bordon, A. R., Sanchez, J. A., and Veeneman, S. Parametric
system integrity of operating networks: detection, maintenance
and restoration of discontinuity of operation by BIR application
to unauthorized access and network disruption. IDEA Technical
Reports, 1999.
124. Visotskii, V. I., Kornilova, A. A., Samyolenko, I. I. and
Zykov, G. A. Observation and mass-spectroscopy study of
controlled transmutation of intermediate mass isotopes in
growing biological cultures. Infinite Energy 36, 64-68, 2001.
125. Visotskii, V. I., Kornilova, A. A and Samyolenko, I. I.
Experimental discovery and investigation of the phenomenon of
nuclear transmutation of isotopes in growing biological cultures.
Infinite Energy 2, 63, 1996.

200
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

126. Bordon, A. R. Ultimate causation (T-boundary) as causal


sui-genesis of all superdomains, including 4-spacetime.
Foundation Reports in Life Physics 1, 1, 60-108, 2004.
127. Ho, M. W. Bioenergetics and biocommunication. In
Computation in cellular and molecular biological systems. R.
Cuthbertson, M. Holcombe, and R. Paton (eds.), 251-264,
Singapore, World Scientific, 1996.
128. Nordenström, B. Exploring BCEC Systems (Biologically
Closed Electric Circuits. Nordic Medical Publications/Ursus
Medical AB, Stockholm, Sweden, 1998.
129. Bordon, A. R., Wienz, E. M., Colossimo-Jaime, C. J., and
Sanchez, J. A. The internal psychophysiologic algorithm for the
manifest production observership of the light encoding of a
reality matrix. Life Physics Group – California, 2001.
130. Dennett, D. C. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. New York,
Simon & Schuster, 1995, pp. 50-51.
131. Bordon, A. R. and D. H. Hasler. Thing out of nothing: Light
encoding of object matrices and manifest production
observership in the Idiomaterial UNUM – A technical
monograph. Idiomaterial UNUM-Universe Series, LPG-C
Technical Monographs and Essays 1, October, 2009.

201
A. R. BORDON

12
ADDITIONAL REFERENCES

BOOKS
Bordon, A. R. Ultimate Thought: Life in a Bicausal
Information Universe. Foundation Books Online, 2009.
Bordon, A. R., R. N. Boyd, and A. Klein. The Coming
Longevitality Of The EARTH Human COBE Biomind.
Foundation Books Online, 2009.

THEORETICAL
Bordon, A. R. (2009b) Idiomaterial Universe 1: The UNUM as
Monoidal Category of Objects and Morphisms as Continuum
Multileveled Manifold – A Work in Progress of the Needed
Mathematics and Problems Ahead. LPG-C Technical Essays &
Monographs, 2009. (Idiomaterial Unum-Universe Series, 2nd
edition May 2004, reedited July 2009).
Bordon, A. R. & Wienz, E. M. (2006) The UNUM as a natural
system. LPG-C Technical Essays & Monographs, 2009.
(Idiomaterial Unum-Universe Series, July 2006).
A. R. Bordon, J. A. Sanchez, F. M. Maye, E. M. Wienz, J. J.
Jones, R. B. Solingen and J. T. Traveler (2009). Idiomaterial
Universe 2: The UNUM as Form-Design Continuum in
the Inner UNUM’s Condensate Region. – A Monograph. LPG-C
Technical Essays & Monographs, 2009. (Idiomaterial Unum-
Universe Series, August 2009).
Bordon, A. R., E. M. Wien, and R. B. Solingen.
Biogeosystemics: Ten years of theory and measurements of the
energetics and processes that impinge upon life on Earth. LPG-
California, 2006.
A. R. Bordon, E. M. Wienz, and R. B. Solingen. An examination
of the Priore effect in the induction of broad backaction cascades
across all time-space regimes in living tissue: The use of low-
powered non-ionizing and ionizing energetics (light, sound and
EM) for the promotion of human tissue complete pristine

202
SOMETHING FROM NO THING

reconforming recovery. Life Physics Group – California, LPG-


C-05/NRG1022, January 2005.

GENERAL & HISTORICAL


Bordon, A. R. & Wienz, E. M. (2009). How the Life Physics
Group – California Came About. LPG-C Technical Essays &
Monographs, 2009. (Idiomaterial Unum-Universe Series,
September 2009).

203
A. R. BORDON

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

A.R. Bordon is a biophysicist cofounder of the Life Physics


Group-California and a fiction and screenwriter who resides in
California, Tennessee, Costa Rica, Paraguay, and Brazil (not at
the same time). His publications are displayed at www. lulu.com.
Go to http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/ARBORDON.

204

You might also like