Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • In The High Court of Judicature at Bombay Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Writ Petition No. 78 of 2020

    Uploaded by

    tanmaystar
    10 views2 pages
    1) The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a criminal complaint filed against them. 2) The complainant (respondent no. 2) has now filed an affidavit stating that the parties have settled the dispute amicably. 3) Based on the affidavit, the court quashes the criminal complaint and disposes of the writ petition.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    230800000782020_3

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a criminal complaint filed against them. 2) The complainant (respondent no. 2) has now filed an affidavit stating that the parties have settled the dispute amicably. 3) Based on the affidavit, the court quashes the criminal complaint and disposes of the writ petition.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    10 views2 pages

    In The High Court of Judicature at Bombay Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Writ Petition No. 78 of 2020

    Uploaded by

    tanmaystar
    1) The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a criminal complaint filed against them. 2) The complainant (respondent no. 2) has now filed an affidavit stating that the parties have settled the dispute amicably. 3) Based on the affidavit, the court quashes the criminal complaint and disposes of the writ petition.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Rane 1/2 WP-78-2020(SR.

    8)
    October 29,2021.

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

    CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

    WRIT PETITION NO. 78 OF 2020

    Aroon Purie .....Petitioner

    V/s.

    The State of Maharashtra


    and anr. .....Respondents

    ****
    Mr. Pratik M. Thakkar i/by. DSK Legal, Advocate for the
    petitioner.

    Smt. S.V. Sonawane, APP for State-respondent no.1.

    Ms. Ashwini Bhagat, Advocate for respondent no.2.

    Coram : Sandeep K. Shinde, J.

    Friday, 29th October, 2021.

    P.C. :
    1. Heard.

    2. Pending petition, complainant (respondent no.2) in

    S.C.C. No.922/2019, pending in the Court of Judicial

    Magistrate First Class at Panvel, has filed an Affidavit sworn

    on 21st October, 2021 stating that parties have amicably

    settled and resolved the dispute. Copy of the affidavit is

    taken on record and marked “X-1” for identification. Thus,


    Rane 2/2 WP-78-2020(SR.8)
    October 29,2021.

    in view of the Affidavit, complaint SCC No.922/2019

    pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class,

    Panvel, District-Raigad filed by respondent no.2 is quashed.

    The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

    Digitally
    signed by
    NEETA
    NEETA SHAILESH
    SHAILESH SAWANT
    SAWANT Date:
    2021.10.29
    17:19:53
    +0530

    (Sandeep K. Shinde, J.)

    You might also like