Efficient
Insert thedesign
title of process as
yourEurocode
per presentation
3 & here
BC 1 : 2012

Chris Dev
Kapil JungBansal
Civil Engineer 
MIDAS IT

October 14, 2014

Hotel Intercontinental
Novotel, Singapore ~~~~~
 

Efficient design process as per

Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012

01 Overview
02  Analysis Requirements
03 Design Specifications
04 Design

2
 

Building Design Workflow

Architectural concept design

Integrated Design
Material Member Type
• In the same model file
Steel • RC Frame
• Concrete • RC Slab
• Raft Footing
Structural solution Material • Steel Frame
• Steel
• Concrete
Apply loads
Member Type
• RC Frame
• RC Slab
Structural analysis • Raft Footing
• Steel Frame

Combinations of actions

Design structural elements

Project documentation

3
Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012
 

Interface with Revit Structures

 R 
Functions Revit <> Gen  e
 v 
Structural Column <>
 i  
 t  
Beam <>
   s
   r    t
 S 
   a    n
   e    e
Brace <>  t  
 r 
   n
   i    m
   e
   L    l Curved Beam >  u
   E
 c 
Beam System >  t  
 u
>
Truss
 r 
 e
Foundation Slab <>
  m
Structural Floor <>
   s
   r    t
   a    n
 i  
 d 
Structural Wall <>
   n    e
   a    m  a
    l    e
   P    l
   E
Wall Opening & Window >  s 
Door >  G 
Vertical or Shaft Opening >  e
Offset >
 n
Rigid Link >
Cross-Section Rotation >
   y
   r End Release >
   a
    d
   n
   u
   o
Isolated Foundation Support > Section Mapping Dialog Box
   B Point Boundary Condition >
Line Boundary Condition >
Wall Foundation >
Area Boundary Condition >
Load Nature >
Load Case >
    d
   a
Load Combination >
   o
   L Hosted Point Load >
Hosted Line Load >
Hosted Area Load >
   s
   r
   e Material <>
    h
   t
   O Level >

4
Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012
 

Soil Structure Interaction

Point Spring Support  Surface Spring Supports

• Linear • Nodal Spring

• Comp.-only • Distributed Spring
• Tens.-only
• Multi-linear type

Nonlinear characteristics of springs

over the pile height are calculated
automatically.

The spring supports can be activated

/deactivated during the construction
stages

[Pile Spring Support] [Surface Spring Support]

5
Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012
 

Efficient design process as per

Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012

01 Overview
02  Analysis Requirements
03 Design Specifications
04 Design

6
 

Material Properties

The Design Parameters, py and f y,

corresponding to different Steel Grades
Material properties
BC1:2012 in BC1:2012
in midas Gen
as per BC1:2012

Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012

 

Imperfections
Imperfections

Member Imperfections Global Imperfections

 Adopt correct buckling curves in  Apply Notional Loads
member design

Don’t Consider Sway

Consider Sway
Hi ≥ 0.15 VEd
Hi ≤ 0.15 Ved
Calculate Notional Loads using Hi = Φ NEd
NEd should be considered with Dead Load
and Live Load

Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012

 

Notional Load
Φ
Calculation of Notional Load

Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012

 

Method of Analysis
Method of Analysis

Determine the sensitivity due to sway, αcr 

Perform Buckling Analysis Fcr /Fcd

Perform rigorous calculations (HEd/VEd)*(h/δHE,d)

Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012


Analysis Types
Construction Stage Analysis
Post-tensioning girder analysis
Material Nonlinear Analysis
Floor Vibration Analysis
 Linear Static Analysis
 Buckling Analysis
• Linear Buckling Analysis using Eigen value analysis
• Non Linear Buckling Analysis
 Geometric Nonlinear Analysis
• P-Delta Analysis
• Large Displacement Analysis
 Material Nonlinear Analysis
• Plastic Analysis
• Structural Masonry Analysis
 Construction Stage Analysis
• Time Dependent Material
• Column Shortening Analysis (Elastic/Inelastic)
 Floor Vibration Analysis
Seismic Analysis
 Dynamic Analysis
• Free Vibration Analysis
• Response Spectrum Analysis
 Pushover Analysis
• FEMA, Eurocode, Multi-Linear Hinge Properties
• RC, Steel, SRC, Masonry material types
 Time History Analysis
• Boundary Non Linear (Damper, Isolator, Gap, Hook)
• Inelastic Time History Analysis
Specialized Analysis
 Other Analysis
• Pre Stress Analysis
• Moving Load Analysis
 Heat of Hydration Analysis
• Thermo-elastic Analysis
• Maturity, Creep, Shrinkage, Pipe Cooling
Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012
 

Buckling Analysis
Linear Buckling Non-Linear Buckling Analysis
Theoretical buckling strength using eigenvalue  Applied loading incrementally increases until a small
analysis of structure which is idealized as elastic change in load level causes a large displacement.

   r
   o
   t
   c
   a
   F
 
    d
   a
   o
   L

Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012

 

Method of Analysis
Method of Analysis

Determine the sensitivity due to sway, αcr 

Perform Buckling Analysis Fcr /Fcd

Perform rigorous calculations (HEd/VEd)*(h/δHE,d)

αcr  ≥ 10 ≤ 10
αcr 

First Order Moments Second Order Moments

Magnify 1st order moments if  Second Order Analysis

• Single Story P-δ, P- Δ Analysis is required
• Multi-story if similar vertical, horizontal,
stiffness
Magnify moments due to:
• Horizontal loads
• Notional loads
Magnify by factor:
1/(1-1/αcr )

Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012

 

Geometry Non-Linear Analysis

Second Order Analysis Large Displacement effect
P-δ effect Deformed configuration is considered when
P-small-delta, is associated with local deformation assembling the equilibrium equations.
relative to the element chord between end nodes.

P- Δ effect
P-big-delta, is associated with displacements
relative to member ends.

Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012

 

Efficient design process as per

Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012

01 Overview
02  Analysis Requirements
03 Design Specifications
04 Design

15
 

Load Combination Generation

Editing auto generated

Orthogonal loadCombinations
Effect in Load combinations

Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012

 

Definition of Frame
 Auto calculation of effective length factor 

Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012

 

Definition of Frame
Member Assignment Example 1
2

 Automatic Member Definition

Unbraced Length

Ly

Lz
K y
Ly K z

Lz

Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012

 

Laterally Unraced Length

The laterally unbraced length is the unbraced length for lateral buckling about the element’s local x-
axis when the members are under the axial loads. The laterally unbraced length is required to
calculate the design flexural strength considering lateral buckling.

a b

a b

Laterally unbraced length = a + b

Lateral Torsional Buckling Laterally unbraced length

Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012

 

Efficient design process as per

Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012

01 Overview
02  Analysis Requirements
03 Design Specifications
04 Design

20
 

Applicable Sections for ULS

LIMIT STATES
Section Shape Flexural Shear Buckling
Yielding LTB
Buckling Strong axis Weak axis
Doubly Symmetric   √ √ √ N/A   √
I section
Singly Symmetric   √ √ √ N/A N/A

Box   √ √ √ √ (2) N/A

Angle   √ √ N/A N/A N/A

Channel   √ √ √ N/A N/A

Tee   √ √ N/A N/A N/A

Double Angle   √ √ N/A N/A N/A

Double Channel   √ √ √ N/A N/A

Pipe   √ √ N/A N/A N/A

Solid Rectangle   √ √ N/A N/A N/A

Solid Round   √ √ N/A N/A N/A

U-Rib N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012

 

Star-battened Section
• New section database for star-battened section is implemented. Same DB sections as angle type are used.
• Steel design as per EN1993-1-1:2005 are implemented for compression verification.
• Compression yielding checks and buckling checks are provided.

2-Angel Section Data Steel Code Checking

Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012

 

Classification of Sections

Section Classification Classification Criteria

 Axial Resistance

Shear Resistance

Bending Resistance

Lateral Torsional Buckling

Forces Interaction

Design Report

Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012

 

ULS - Axial Resistance

Section Classification  Axial Buckling

Yielding Resistance
• Design compression resistance
• Slenderness of member 
 Axial Resistance For class
Class 1,2 &3 3 cross sections
1, 2 and Class 4

Shear Resistance
• Limiting Slenderness Ratio
For class 4 cross sections

Bending Resistance

• Design buckling strength

Lateral Torsional Buckling

• Design tension resistance

Forces Interaction

Design Report

Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012

 

ULS - Shear Resistance

Section Classification Buckling

Shear Yielding
Resistance of members in shear 

 Axial Resistance

Shear Resistance

Bending Resistance

Lateral Torsional Buckling

Forces Interaction

Design Report

Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012

 

ULS - Bending Resistance

Section Classification Design bending resistance

• For class 1 & 2 cross sections

 Axial Resistance

• For class 3 cross sections

Shear Resistance

Bending Resistance • For class 4 cross sections

Lateral Torsional Buckling

Forces Interaction

Design Report

Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012

 

ULS – Lateral Torsional Buckling Resistance

• Slenderness of member 
Section Classification

 Axial Resistance Factors for calculating critical moment

Shear Resistance • Limiting Slenderness Ratio

Bending Resistance • Design buckling resistance

Lateral Torsional Buckling

Forces Interaction

Design Report

Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012

 

ULS – Force Interaction

Section Classification Membersinincombined

Members Combined bendingaxial
combinedbending,
Bending & axial
and & shear 
Shear 
The effect of shear force on moment resistance is considered
Where the shear force is less than half the plastic shear resistance,
its effect on the moment resistance is neglected
 Axial Resistance
VEd ≥ 0.5Vpl,Rd

Shear Resistance

Bending Resistance

Lateral Torsional Buckling

Forces Interaction

Design Report

Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012

 

Steel Checking – Design Report

Section Classification Graphical

Tabular Results
Results
Detailed Report
Graphic Report
 Axial Resistance

Shear Resistance

Change a steel section

Bending Resistance

Lateral Torsional Buckling

Forces Interaction

Design Report

Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012

 

Steel Optimal Design

User Control on Member Selection
• Built Up section can be optimized by providing available plate thickness.
• Sections can be optimized within provided section database.
• Section shapes can be changed during optimization.
• Sections can be optimized within user provided limits (User can restrict Depth, Width or Thickness)

 All the sections within ± 5% of the

entered dimensions are examined for
strength verification.
If the entry is "0", all dimensions are
searched.

Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012

 

Building Design Procedure: Summary

Actions and Combinati General considerations

Slab Design Column Design Documentation
ons and Analysis

•Flexure •Slenderness • Design parameters

•Exposure class
•Exposure class
•Shear / Punching •Axial + Bending • Results:
•Fire resistance
graphs,
•Permanent action •Deflection •Detailing
•Imperfections tables,
•Detailing charts
•Variable actions •Ductile failure
• Design:
•Wind load •Panel zone effect critical elements,
design checks,
•Non-linear analysis (g
•Seismic load calculations
eometric or material)
• Project report
•Response Spectrum Beam Design Wall Design
•Dynamic load
• Drawings
•Time History Analysis
•Load combinations •Flexure • As columns *(Dshop)*
•Capacity Design
•Shear • Fire resistance*

•Deflection • Bending about wea

k axis
•Detailing
• Detailing*

Efficient design process as per Eurocode 3 & BC 1 : 2012

 

Thank You