DEVELOPMENT AND

ACCEPTABILITY OF
ORGANIC SOAP FROM
PANSIT-PANSITAN
(PEPEROMIA
PELLUCIDA)
RESEARCH II FRANCESCA YSABELA C. PAZ
 INTRODUCTION
Due to harmful sourcing practices, manufacturing processes, and poor waste management the impact of skincare on
biodiversity in the Philippines have depleted natural resources, polluted and disrupted organic ecosystems and
contributions to carbon emissions and environmental degradation. (Mirasol, 2022).

Recent studies have shed light on the potential skincare benefits of this plant. One study conducted by Maramba et
al. (2021) investigated the anti-inflammatory properties of Peperomia Pellucida. The researchers found that extracts
from the plant exhibited significant anti-inflammatory activity, which could be beneficial for individuals with skin
conditions characterized by inflammation, such as acne or eczema. The anti-inflammatory effect of Peperomia
Pellucida can potentially help in reducing redness, swelling, and irritation on the skin.

Peperomia Pellucida has also been reported to possess antioxidant properties (Nera, 2023). Antioxidants play a
crucial role in protecting the skin against oxidative stress caused by free radicals, which can lead to premature aging
and other skin damage. The presence of antioxidants in Peperomia Pellucida suggests its potential in promoting
healthy and youthful-looking skin. Moreover, the plant has been investigated for its anti-hyperuricemic properties
(Sanchez, 2020).
 THE PROBLEMS
1. What are the procedures involved in developing organic soap from Pansit-
pansitan?
2. What is the level of acceptability of the organic soap in terms of appearance, texture,
odor, quality, and firmness?
3. Which treatment option for the development of Pansit-pansitan soap is considered
the most acceptable?
4. What is the Return on Investment (ROI) associated with the development of Pansit-
pansitan soap?
 OBJECTIVES 01
Assess procedures in developing organic soap
from pansit-pansitan.

OBJECTIVES 02
Evaluate the acceptability of organic soap that is
composed of Pansit-pansitan (Peperomia

OBJECTIVES
Pellucida) terms of: Texture, Appearance, Odor,
Quality, and Hardness.
 OBJECTIVES 03
Evaluate the most acceptable treatment for the
development of Pansit-pansitan soap.

OBJECTIVES 04
Assess the Return on Investment(ROI) in the
development of the experimental soap.

OBJECTIVES
 LITERARY REVIEW
Skincare plays a crucial role in maintaining the
health and appearance of the skin. It involves
various practices, products, and treatments aimed
at cleansing, moisturizing, protecting, and
enhancing the skin's overall condition. The history
of skincare can be traced back to ancient
civilizations, where different cultures developed
their own beauty rituals and skincare techniques.
According to Begoun (2003).
excerpts of related literature
The Greeks believed in the importance of maintaining
healthy and youthful skin. They used olive oil and honey as
natural moisturizers, and they developed various cleansing
techniques, including the use of clay and herbal infusions
(Carrasquillo et al., 2019). Similarly, ancient Chinese
civilization had a rich tradition of skincare. The Chinese
developed herbal remedies and medicinal treatments for
skin conditions. They recognized the importance of
maintaining a healthy complexion and developed skin care
practices based on traditional medicine principles (Jin et
al., 2015).
 LITERARY REVIEW
Ulasimang Bato has antioxidant properties and is
rich in antioxidants, which help protect the body
from damage caused by free radicals. It also has
hypoglycemic(helps with low blood sugar levels),
diuretic(helps with excess fluid i.e. urine), and
antibacterial properties. It’s an analgesic, which
helps reduce pain and discomfort. Ulasimang Bato
is also anti-hyperuricemia which reduces the risk
of gout. (Nera. 2023).
excerpts of related literature
Ulimasang bato contains high levels of calcium,
magnesium, iron, and other trace minerals that are
beneficial for the skin. These minerals can help to
nourish and hydrate the skin, improve its texture,
and reduce the appearance of fine lines and
wrinkles. Additionally, ulasimang bato has a unique
texture that is said to be helpful in exfoliating the
skin. It can help to remove dead skin cells, unclog
pores, and improve skin tone and clarity. (Sanchez,
2020) .
 LITERARY REVIEW
One of the key advantages of handmade soap is its
potential soothing properties for the skin.
Commercial soaps often contain harsh chemicals
and synthetic additives that can strip the skin of
its natural oils and cause dryness or irritation. In
contrast, handmade soap is often made with
nourishing oils, such as olive oil, coconut oil, and
shea butter, which can help moisturize and soothe
the skin (Kalambe et al., 2022).
excerpts of related literature
Handmade soap is often made in small batches,
which means there is less waste and fewer resources
used in the manufacturing process. The production
of soap by hand is both cost efficient and
environmentally friendly. Since homemade soap
can utilize used cooking oil as its raw material, it is a
terrific way to reduce waste. Handmade soaps often
contain high levels of glycerin, which is a natural
humectant that can help to draw moisture to the
skin and keep it hydrated.
HYPOTHESIS
If the calculated p-value from the statistical analysis is less
than 0.05, it indicates that the difference in acceptability
between Pansit-pansitan soap and the control treatment
soap is statistically significant. On the other hand, if the
calculated p-value is greater than or equal to 0.05, it suggests
that there is insufficient evidence to reject the null
hypothesis, meaning that the acceptability of Pansit-
pansitan soap is not significantly different from the control
treatment soap.
METHODOLOGY
1. Material Gathering
2. Preparation of Materials
3. Saponification
4. Data Gathering

 METHODOLOGY
The appliances prepared for the research experiment conducted for the
development of pansit-pansitan (peperomia pellucida) organic soap:

Blender Spoon
Measuring Cup Soap Mold
Rubber gloves 2 Plastic Pitchers w/ lids
Safety goggles Large pot

METHODOLOGY
Ingredients T0 T1 T₂ T₃

Tomato Extract 225g 0g 0g 0g

Pansit-Pansitan Extract 0g 170g 225g 280g

Lye 55g 55g 55g 55g

Coconut Oil 280g 280g 280g 280g

Olive Oil 140g 140g 140g 140g

Water 225g 225g 225g 225g

100° 100° 100° 100°

Temperature
F F F F

Ingredients that were used in conducting the

research.
 METHODOLOGY
Hedonic scale used in determining
the level of acceptability the
experimental soap garnered.
Scale Description
1 Dislike Extremely
2 Dislike Very Much 
3 Dislike Moderately 
4 Dislike Slightly
5 Neither Like nor Dislike
6 Like Slightly 
7 Like Moderately 
8 Like Very Much 
9 Like Extremely
 RESULTS
T1 T2 T3

1. Preparing ingredients.
2. Measuring different proportions of treatments.
3. Blending Pansit-Pansitan, filtering out solids with cheesecloth.
4. Mixing lye with water.
5. Boil lye mixture to 100°F to add extract and oils.
6. Mix until it’s a homogenous mixture.
7. Let it cool for 36 hours, cut, cure for 2 weeks to let Saponification occur.

Procedures in the making of Pansit-Pansitan soap.

APPEARANCE
RESULTS
Treatments Mean Interpretation

Treatment 0 8.7a Like Very Much

Treatment 1 7.8a Like Moderately

Treatment 2 8.5a Like Very Much

Treatment 3 8.7a Like Very Much

ANOVA
RESULT                   f -value       3.59 p-value        0.0228ns
               

C.V. (%) 5.07

LSD Value n/a

TEXTURE
RESULTS
Treatments Mean Interpretation

Treatment 0 8.1a Like Very Much

Treatment 1 7.8a Like Moderately

Treatment 2 8.6a Like Very Much

Treatment 3 8.9a Like Very Much

ANOVA RESULT                           f-value           4.92       p-value      0.0586ns

C.V. (%) 5.70

LSD Value n/a

ODOR
RESULTS
Treatments Mean Interpretation

Treatment 0 8.3ab Like Very Much

Treatment 1 7.6b Like Moderately

Treatment 2 8.6a Like Very Much

Treatment 3 8.6a Like Very Much

ANOVA RESULT                         f-value           5.24     p-value         0.0042*

C.V. (%) 5.70

LSD Value 0.7

QUALITY
RESULTS
Treatments Mean Interpretation

Treatment 0 8.2a Like Very Much

Treatment 1 7.7a Like Moderately

Treatment 2 8.4a Like Very Much

Treatment 3 8.6a Like Very Much

ANOVA RESULT                         f-value     2.19      p-value     0.1059ns

C.V. (%) 4.69

LSD Value n/a

FIRMNESS
RESULTS
Treatments Mean Interpretation

Treatment 0 8.4a Like Very Much

Treatment 1 8a Like Very Much

Treatment 2 8.3a Like Very Much

Treatment 3 8.8a Like Very Much

ANOVA RESULT                       f-value          1.78        p-value     0.1687ns

C.V. (%) 3.94

LSD Value n/a

SUMMARY
Among the sensory attributes which were evaluated with the use of a 9-point
hedonic scale were appearance, texture, odor, quality, firmness. The treatments
the study utilized are as follows: Treatment 0 (T0) with 225 grams of Tomato
Extract, 55 grams of lye, 280 grams of coconut oil, 140 grams of olive oil, 225
grams of water and the soap solution is mixed at 100°F. Treatment 1 (T1) with
170 grams of Pansit-Pansitan Extract,55 grams of lye, 280 grams of coconut oil,
140 grams of olive oil, 225 grams of water and the soap solution is mixed at
100°F. Treatment 2 (T₂) with 225 grams of Pansit-Pansitan Extract, 55 grams of
lye, 280 grams of coconut oil, 140 grams of olive oil, 225 grams of water and the
soap solution is mixed at 100°F. Treatment 3 (T₃) with 280 grams of Pansit-
Pansitan Extract, 55 grams of lye, 280 grams of coconut oil, 140 grams of olive
oil, 225 grams of water and the soap solution is mixed at 100°F.
ISABELA STATE
UNIVERSITY
SUMMARY
Characteristic Treatment 0  Treatment 1 Treatment 2 Treatment 3
Mean Description Mean Description Mean Description Mean Description
Appearance 8.7 LVM 7.8 LM 8.5 LVM 8.7 LVM
Texture 8.1 LVM 7.8 LM 8.6 LVM 8.9 LVM
Odor 8.3 LVM 7.6 LM 8.6 LVM 8.6 LVM
Quality 8.2 LVM 7.7 LM 8.4 LVM 8.6 LVM
Firmness 8.4 LVM 8 LVM 8.3 LVM 8.8 LVM
Grand Mean 8.34 LVM 7.78 LM 8.48 LVM 8.72 LVM
note : LVM : Liked Very Much; LM : Liked Moderately
ISABELA STATE
UNIVERSITY
SUMMARY
Characteristic T0 T1 T2 T3 F-value P-Value

Mean Mean Mean Mean

Appearance 8.7 7.8 8.5 8.7 3.59 0.0228ns

Texture 8.1 7.8 8.6 8.9 4.92  0.0058ns

Odor 8.3ab 7.6b 8.6a 8.6a 5.24 0.0042*

Quality 8.2 7.7 8.4 8.6 2.19   0.1059ns

Firmness 8.4 8 8.3 8.8 1.78   0.1687ns

ISABELA STATE
UNIVERSITY
SUMMARY
T0 T1 T2 T3

Total Production Cost (PHP) 79.30 79.30 79.30 79.30

Unit cost = Total

19.83 19.83 19.83 19.83
ProductionNo. of Soap

Selling price= Unit cost x 50%

29.75 29.75 29.75 29.75
unit cost + unit cost

Net income =Total sale - total 50.02 50.02 50.02 50.02

production % % % %
SUMMARY
For the summary of cost and analysis of pansit-
pansitan organic soap, the total of PHP 79.30
was computed from four different treatments.
In regards to the Return on Investment (ROI),
it was computed to be 50.02%.

| Claudia Alves |
CONCLUSION
Based on the results of the study, the following conclusions are derived:
1. Pansit-Pansitan (Peperomia Pellucida) Organic soap Treatment 3
possessed the highest mean in terms of acceptability regarding
appearance, firmness, odor, quality, and texture with a grand mean
interpretation of liked very much.
2. The product which went through Treatment 1 is the least acceptable
with a grand mean interpretation of liked moderately.
3. There is no significant difference in regards to odor with Treatment
0, Treatment 2 and Treatment 3, but Treatment 2 and Treatment 3
indicated a significant difference with Treatment 1, contrarily,
Treatment 0 did not exhibit a significant difference with Treatment
1.
CONCLUSION
4. There is no significant difference in terms of
appearance, firmness, quality and texture between
Treatment 0, Treatment 1, Treatment 2 and
Treatment 3.
5. Regardless of difference in treatments, it yields
the same profit for business ventures. Pansit-
pansitan soap yields 50.02% Return on Investment
(ROI).
 RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS 01
Pansit-Pansitan Extract further explored in its use in soap making.

RECOMMENDATIONS 02

Agar Diffusion Assay.

| Claudia Alves |
 RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS 03
Moisture Content Analysis.

RECOMMENDATIONS 04
Find Optimal Moisture Range.

| Claudia Alves |
 RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS 05
Find the diameter of the zone of inhibition for S. aureus, P. aeruginosa and C. albicans at different
concentrations of herbal soap

RECOMMENDATIONS 06
Determining Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

| Claudia Alves |
THANK YOU!
RESEARCH II FRANCESCA YSABELA C. PAZ