Mep MK BR Pup CLC 0001

This document is the property of MEP, and must not be passed on to any third person or firm not authorised
by us, nor be copied/made use of in full or part by such person or firm without our
30.01.2017 A0 Issued for Approval VM NKS BS

DATE REV. NO. DESCRIPTION Prepared Checked Approved
REVISIONS
CONTRACTOR :
CLIENT : AUTHORITY'S ENGINEER :
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
DESIGN CONSULTANT :
prior permission writing.
SAI CONSULTING ENGINEERS PVT. LTD.
DETAILED DESIGN FOR 4-LANING OF MAHUVA-KAGVADAR SECTION OF NH-51 FROM 100/100 TO KM 139/915
PROJECT :
(DESIGN CHAINAGE FROM KM 100+450 TO KM 140+470) (PACKAGE-III) IN THE STATE OF GUJARAT
JOB No. TAD216024
TOTAL NO. OF PAGES 29 TITLE :
NAME SIGN DATE
Prepared VM 30.01.2017
Typical Design of Box Type PUP (1x7000x4650) at Schedule Design Chainage
Checked NKS 30.01.2017 108+875 and 117+622
Approved BS 30.01.2017
CODE REV.
DOC. No. M E P - M K - B R - P U P - C L C - 0 0 0 1
IRC A0
RELEASED FOR PRELIMINARY TENDER INFORMATION P APPROVAL CONSTRUCTION

PROJECT: Detailed Design for 4-Laning of Mahuva-Kagvadar DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Section of NH-51 from 100/100 to Km 139/915
(Design Chainage from Km 100+450 to Km MEP-MK-BR-PUP-CLC-0001 30.01.2017
140+470) (Package-III) in the State of Gujarat
TITLE: Typical Design of Box Type PUP (1x7000x4650) at DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET 1
Schedule Design Chainage 108+875 and 117+622 VM NKS
CHANGE RECORD PAGE
Revision Description of Revision Date
A0 Issued for Approval 30.01.2017

PROJECT: Detailed Design for 4-Laning of Mahuva-Kagvadar DOCUMENT NO. DATE
Section of NH-51 from 100/100 to Km 139/915
(Design Chainage from Km 100+450 to Km MEP-MK-BR-PUP-CLC-0001 30.01.2017
140+470) (Package-III) in the State of Gujarat
TITLE: Typical Design of Box Type PUP (1x7000x4650) at DESIGNED CHECKED SHEET 2
Schedule Design Chainage 108+875 and 117+622
VM NKS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 Typical Design of Box Type PUP (1x7000x4650) at Schedule Design
Chainage 108+875 and 117+622
 Introduction 3
 Codes & References 3
 Design Concept / Approach 3
 Basic Design Data 4
 Load Calulation 5
 Dead Load (Self Weight of bridge) 5
 Superimposed dead load (SIDL) 5
 Live Load 5
 Breaking force 11
 Soil Pressure From Side Wall ( When soil is dry ) 11
 Live Load Surcharge (When soil is dry) 12
 Differential Temperature Effect 12
 Footpath Live Load 13
 Load Combination As Per IRC: 6 2014 13
 Limit State of Structural Strength 13
 Limit State of Servisibility 14
 Rare Combination 14
 Frequent Combination 14
 Quasi Permenant Combination 14
 Load combination for Base Pressure 15
 Spring Constant Calculation 15
 Check for SBC 15
 Design of RCC Box 16
 Ultimate Limit State Of Structural Strength 17
 Main Reinforcement Calculation for All Components 17
 Distribution Reinforcement for all Components 19
 Check for Shear 19
 Limit State of Serveciability 22
 Check for Crack/Uncracked Section 23
 Check for Deflection 24
 Check for Stresses 24
 Check for Crack Width 25
 Calculations for SBC at Schedule Design Chainage 108+875 27
 Calculations for SBC at Schedule Design Chainage 117+622 28-29
 Reference Drawings
 G.A.Drawing for Box type PUP at Design Ch. 108+875 TAD216024-C-RP-PU-GA-0001
 Reinf. Details of Box type PUP at Design Ch. 108+875 TAD216024-C-RP-PU-NU-0001
 G.A.Drawing for Box type PUP at Design Ch. 117+622 TAD216024-C-RP-PU-GA-0002
 Reinf. Details of Box type PUP at Design Ch. 117+622 TAD216024-C-RP-PU-NU-0002
DOCUMENT NO.
MEP-MK-BR-PUP-CLC-0001
SHEET 3
1.0 Introduction
This is a Design of Box Type PUP at Schedule Design Ch. 108+875 and 117+622. The internal size of box is 7000 X
4650 having Single cell. The invert level of box is proposed to match with the cross road level. This design
pertains to the design of box type PUP with average cushion 310 mm.
2.0 Codes & References
IRC:6-2014 - Standard specifications and code of practice for road bridges Section II-Loads and Stresses.
IRC:112-2011 - Code of practice for Concrete Road Bridges
IRC:78-2014 - Standard specifications and code of practice for road bridges.
IRC:SP-13 - Guidelines for the design of small bridges and culverts.
3.0 Design Concept / Approach
The box is proposed to be Castinsitu. The RCC box is designed for various live load combinations as per IRC:6
2014.
The dead load of the box is computed. The earth pressure on outer side wall is computed with soil parameters of
C = 0 t/m2, Ф = 30°. Live Load Intensity is worked out as per IRC:112, by placing Live Loads at various locations
giving maximum moment & forces. The resulting load has been applied into the STAAD 2D model of per metre
width along with all possible loads like dead load, SIDL and soil pressure from side walls with various
combinations.The project area is located in seismic zone III and span is less than 15m , hence there is no need to
check for seismic force.
Detailed Design for 4-Laning of Mahuva-Kagvadar Section of NH-51 from 100/100 to Km 139/915
(Design Chainage from Km 100+450 to Km 140+470) (Package-III) in the State of Gujarat
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 4
Input Data
b
f a g
BASIC DESIGN DATA :
Type of Box Underpass

No. of cell = 1
Inner width of cell a = 7.0 m
Vertical height b = 4.650 m
Projection of bottom slab c = 0.0 m
Thickness of top slab d = 0.525 m
Thickness of bottom slab e = 0.625 m
Thickness of Outer Side Wall f = 0.525 m
Thickness of Inner Side Wall g = 0.525 m
Actual length of structure = 8.1 m
Vent way width = 7.0 m
Average Earth Cushion excluding wearing coat = 0.000 m
Live Load surcharge on backfill = 1.2 m
Safe Bearing Capacity available = 15.430 t/m2
Zone of earthquake region = III
Grade of concrete = 30 N/mm2
Grade of main steel = 500 N/mm2
Grade of distribution steel = 500 N/mm2
Width of top slab = 12.50 m
Q = 4.01
Wearing coat thickness = 0.539 m
Clear cover to Top Slab = 40 mm
Clear cover to Bottom Slab = 75 mm
Clear cover to wall = 75 mm
Provision for future overlay of wearing coat = 0 m
Width of bottom slab = 12.50 m
Area of Crash Barrier = 0.400 m2
Area of Footpath = 0 m2
Top of bottom slab below ground = 0.3 m
Fillet Size = 150 mm x 150 mm
Angle of repose of soil for backfill soil f = 30 degrees
Dry Density of Soil for backfill soil g = 2 t/m3
Cohesion of backfill soil C = 0
Submerged Density of Soil for backfill soil g = 1 t/m3
Density of Wearing Coat = 2.5 t/m3
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 5
LOAD CALULATION :
1. Dead Load (Self Weight of bridge) :

For the calculation of self-weight of bridge density of concrete is considered as 2.5 t/m3.
DL of railing, wearing coat and crash barrier is considered on top slab, while load of 0.000 m
depth of soil is considered on bottom slab.
Weight of Earth cushion on top slab = 0.000 t/m

Weight of Crash Barrier = 1.000 t/m
Weight of Footpath = 0.000 t/m
Weight of soil (dry) on bottom slab = 0.000 t/m
2. Superimposed dead load (SIDL) :
Weight of wearing coat / overlay = 1.600 t/m

Weight of wearing coat / overlay on bottom slab = 0.400 t/m
3. Live Load :
The bridge is designed for the 70R Wheeled and 70R tracked loading as per IRC: 6-2014 with
corresponding impact factor.
(a) Class 70 R Wheeled Vehicles (40 ton Boggie Axle), at centre in longitudinal direction
(i) LL starting from edge of box, i.e. cg of live load 0.74 m from outer wall
Dispersion of live load as per IRC: 6 -2014, Annex A Cl. 201.2
Tyre contact area over road surface = Actual max tyre load = (5 x 1000) = 948.23 cm2
Max tyre pressure 5.273
Now as per IRC: 6 -2014, Annex A Cl. 201.2 Note-3
Tyre width perpendicular to span = 410-50 = 360 mm
Width of dispersion along the span

tp = te + 2 x (tw + ts + cushion)
where te = Width of tyre contact area parallel to span
= (948.23 x 100 / 360.00) = 263.40 mm
tw = thickness of wearing coat / Overlay = 539 mm
ts = overall depth of slab = 525 mm
tp = 263.40 + 2 x (538.5 + 525 + 0 ) = 2390.40 mm > 1220 mm
= 2.39 m 1.22 m
20T 1.22 m 20T
0m + 0.5385m
45
0.525 m
1.274
7.525 m
Dispersion of Live load along longitudinal direction (IRC-112, Annexure B-3, Cl. B-3.3)
Along longitudinal direction v

= 263.40/2000+1.22+2.39*0.5
= 2547 mm < 7525 mm
Therefore, v = 2.547 m
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 6
Now the effective width of slab may be calculated as per IRC-112, Annexure B-3, Cl. B-3.2
bef = α x a x (1-a / lo) + b1
where lo = effective span = 7.525 m
a = distance of centre of gravity of the concentrated load from the nearer support
= 0.74 m
b1 = breath of concentrated area of the load
= 0.86 + 2 x (0.5385 + 0) = 1.937 m
b = width of the slab = 12.5 m
α = constant depanding upon the ratio b / lo = 2.54
Therefore, bef = 3.64 m
0.45 m
10T 10T
1.93 m
1.20 m
0.86 m
45
1.82 m
12.5 m
Dispersion of Live load along transverse direction (IRC-112, Annexure B-3, Cl. B-3.3)
Along transerve direction, u = 1.82 + 1.82 + 3.64 - 1.708

= 5.57 m
Here, Width of box = 12.50 m > 5.57 m also 12.50 m > 1.93 m
Therefore, u = 5.568 m
if Dispersion along L-dir is <1.22 m then 1 else 2<Entered Choice is > 2
Total live load = 40 T
As per IRC: 6-2014, Cl. 208.3(a)(ii) and CL. 208.6

Impact factor for reinforced concrete bridges = 0.25*1 = 0.25
Live load intensity = 40.00 x 1.25 = 3.526 t/m2

2.55 x 5.57
Live load intensity per m width = 3.526 t/m
(ii) LL centrally placed on span, i.e. cg of live load 3.763 m from outer wall
where te = Width of tyre contact area parallel to span
= (948.23 x 100 / 360.00) = 263.40 mm
tp = 263.40 + 2 x (538.5 + 525 + 0 ) = 2390.40 mm > 1220 mm
2.3904 1.22
20 T 20 T
1.22 m
0.86 0.86 0m + 0.5385m

45
0.525 m
7.525 m
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 7
Along longitudinal direction, v = 2.3904 + 1.22 = 3.61 m < 7.525 m

Now the effective width of slab may be calculated as
bef = α x a x (1-a / lo) + b1
= 3.76 m
= 0.86 + 2 x (0.5385 + 0) = 1.937 m

Also along transverse direction, u = 2.08 + 3.362 + 6.72 - 4.79
= 7.372 m
if Dispersion along L-dir is <1.22 m then 1 else 2<Entered Choice is > 2
Total live load = 40 T

3.61 x 7.37
(b) Class 70 R Tracked Vehicles ,
70T
0m + 0.5385m
45
0.525 m
4.57 m 1.064 m
7.525 m
Along longitudinal direction v = 4.57 + 1.064 = 5.634 m
bef = α x a x (1-a / lo) + b1
= 2.29 m
= 0.84 + 2 x (0.5385 + 0) = 1.917 m
0.45 m
35T 35T
2.06 m
1.20 m
0.84 m
45
2.98 m
12.5 m
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 8
Along transerve direction u = 2.07 + 2.983 + 5.97 - 3.91

= 7.11 m
As per IRC: 6-2014, Cl. 208.3(a)(ii) and CL. 208.6

Impact factor for reinforced concrete bridges = (0.179)*1 = 0.174
Live load intensity = 70 x 1.17 = 2.05 t/m2

5.63 x 7.11
(ii) LL centrally placed on span, i.e. cg of live load at 3.763 m from outer wall
70T
0m + 0.5385m
45
0.525 m
1.064 m 4.57 m 1.064 m
7.525 m
Along longitudinal direction v = 1.064 + 4.57 + 1.0635

= 6.697 m
bef = α x a x (1-a / lo) + b1
= 3.76 m
= 0.84 + 2 x (0.5385 + 0) = 1.917 m

= 7.48 m
Live load intensity = 70 x 1.17375 = 1.64 t/m2

6.70 x 7.48
(c) One lane of Class 70 R Tracked vehicle for every two lane + One lane of Class A Wheeled vehicles on
remaining third lane
Intensity of live load for overlap portion will govern in design of slab and it will be sum of individual intensity mentioned
for 70R track and Class A wheeled vehicle
Intensity of live load for Class 70R Track will be same as given in case (b), for Class A wheel the intensity
is calculated as follows:
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 9
0.45 m 12.50 m
0.84 m
1.20m 0.5 m
0.15 m #
2.06 m
5.7 T 5.7 T
4.57 m 1.2 m 7.525 m
35 T 35 T
0.25m
5.7 T 5.7 T
1.8 m #
70R Track Class A wheel

7.25 m
Position of Live load in Plan

( Table-2, Clause 204.3, IRC: 6 -2014)
0.45 m 7.25 m
35T 35T 11.4T 11.4T
1.20 m 2.06 m 1.80 m
0.84 m
45
12.50 m
Intensity of live load for overlap portion will govern in design of slab and it will be sum of individual intensity mentioned
in Part 1 & Part 2.
Intensity of live load for Part 1 will be same as given in case (b), for Part 2 the intensity is calculated as follows:
Part 2 Class A Wheeled vehicles on remaining third lane ,

Impact factor for reinforced concrete bridges = 0.333 (From cl.208.2(i) and cl.208.6, IRC: 6 -2014)
0.333

where te = Width of tyre contact area parallel to span = 250 mm
tp = 250 + 2 x (538.5 + 525 + 0 ) = 2377.00 mm > 1200 mm
Along longitudinal direction, v = 125+1200+1188.5= 2514 mm < 7525 mm

Hence take, v = 2.514 m
11.4 T 11.4 T
1.2 m
0 m
45
0.525 m
7.525 m
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 10
Calculation of effective width


bef = α x a x (1-a / lo) + b1
= 0.73 m
= 0.5 + 2 x (0.5385 + 0) = 1.577 m
0.45 m 7.25 m
11.4T 11.4T
1.8 m
45
12.50 m 1.62 m

= 5.04 m

2.51 x 5.04
(ii) LL centrally placed on span, i.e. cg of live load 3.76 m from outer wall
Along longitudinal direction, v = 2377+1200 3577

v = 4

bef = α x a x (1-a / lo) + b1
= 3.76 m
= 0.5 + 2 x (0.5385 + 0) = 1.577 m

= 8.16 m

3.58 x 8.16
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 11
Summary of all live loads cases
Dispersion v Total Load Dispersion u

Loading Intensity of Load (t/m2) (m) (t/m) (m)
Class 70 R Wheeled (Two lane Loading)
LL starting from edge of box 3.53 2.55 8.98 5.57
LL centrally placed on span 1.88 3.61 6.78 7.37
Class 70 R Tracked (Two lane Loading)
LL starting from edge of box 2.05 5.63 11.55 7.11
LL centrally placed on span 1.64 6.70 10.98 7.48
Class 70 R Wheeled+Class A (Three Lane Loading)
LL starting from edge of box (70RWh) 3.53 2.55 5.57
15.00
LL starting from edge of box (Class-A) 2.40 2.51 5.04
LL centrally placed on span (70RWh) 1.88 3.61 7.37
9.40
LL centrally placed on span (Class-A) 1.04 2.51 8.16
Class 70 R Tracked+Class A (Three Lane Loading)
LL starting from edge of box (70RTr) 2.05 5.63 7.11
17.58
LL starting from edge of box (Class-A) 2.40 2.51 5.04
LL centrally placed on span (70RTr) 1.64 6.70 7.48
13.60
LL centrally placed on span (Class-A) 1.04 2.51 8.16
Multi lane Class- A
LL starting from edge of box (Class-A) 4.793 2.51 12.05 5.04
LL centrally placed on span (Class-A) 2.081 2.51 5.23 8.16
Therefore, Class 70 R Tracked+Class A (Three Lane Loading) with LL starting from edge of box will govern
As from above, live load itensity for overlapped portion is governing, which is away from crash barrier, and this govening 1
m wide strip is analysed and designed, hence intensity of weight for crash barrier will be zero where live load is overlapping.
4. Breaking force :-
As per cl. 211.2, IRC 6-2014 Breaking force is considered 20% of first two lanes plus 5% of loads on the lanes
in excess of two.
Therefore, breaking force = (2.05*5.63*7.11 x 0.2 ) + (2.05*5.63*7.11 x 0.05 ) + ( 2.40*2.51*5.04 x 0.05 )
= 16.4 + 4.10813 + 1.519
= 22.06 x 0.8 (20% reduction as per cl. 205, IRC 6-2014)
= 17.65 t
Per meter width of = 17.65 = 1.41 t/m
box breaking force 12.5
Moment due to application of breaking force at 1.2m above roadway as per Cl. 211.3 of IRC:6-2014.
= 1.41 x (1.2 +0.5385 + 0 + 0.525/2 )
= 2.825 tm/m
5. Soil Pressure From Side Wall: - ( When soil is dry )
As per Cl.214.1.1.1 of Amendment-2 to IRC:6-2014, Coulomb's equation

Ka = (cos^2(f-a)) / (cos^2a*cos(d+a))*[1/1+{(sin(f+d)*sin(f-i))/(cos(a-i)*cos(d+a))}^0.5]^2
Ka(hor) = Ka*Cosd
Considering, property of backfill behind sidewall

g t/m3 c t/m2 Ф d a i
2 0    
For earth pressure , Ka hor. = 0.279 and K0 at rest = 1 - sin(Ф ) = 0.5
Ka(hor) = 0.5
As per Cl.214.1.4 of Ame.-2 to IRC:6-2014 bell's eq. for, Active Earth Pressure = (Ka x g x h) - ( 2 x c x Ka ^ 0.5)
Lateral pressure at top due to ( i ) Live load surcharge of 1.2 m & ( ii ) Earth Cushion of 0 m height
= ((0.500x2.0x(0.00+0.26))-(2x0.0x0.50^0.5))
= 0.2625 > 0
Also Active earth pressure at center of topwall = 0.263
Lateral pressure at bottom due to ( i ) Live load surcharge of 1.2 m, ( ii ) Earth Cushion of 0 m height
and ( iii ) Back fill of soil
= ((0.500x2.0x(0.00+0.53 + 4.65 + 0.31))-(2x0.0x0.50^0.5))
= 5.4875 t / m 2
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 12
6. Live Load Surcharge: - ( When soil is dry )
According to Bell, Active earth pressure = (Ka x g x h) - ( 2 x c x Ka ^ 0.5)

Lateral pressure at top due to ( i ) Live load surcharge of 1.2 m & ( ii ) Earth Cushion of 0 m height
= ((0.500x2.0x1.2)-(2x0.0x0.50^0.5) ))
= 1.2 > 0
7. Differential Temperature Effect : -

As per Clause 215.3, IRC: 6 -2014
Positive Temperature Difference :-
1000 mm T1
h1
h2
525 mm T2
h3 T3
Total Depth of Top Slab = h = 0.525

h1 = Min of 0.3h or 0.15 m = 0.150
h2 = Min of (max ( 0.3 h , 0.10 m ) , 0.25 m ) 0.158
h3 = Min of 0.3h or 0.15 m = 0.150
0
T1 = 17.8 C
0
T2 = 4 C As per Fig 10 (a) of IRC: 6 -2014
0
T3 = 2.1 C
Force = F = a * a * t *E
a= Area of Section
a = Coff. Of thermal expansion = 120 x 10 -7 /C Clause 215.4 As per IRC: 6 -2014
E= Modulus of Elasticity = 5000 fck =
5000 30 = 27386.13 Mpa
Temperature Force Calculation Force C.G from Mome
Sr. N.A nt
Area of Slab Coff. Average Mod of
NO OfThermal Temperature Elasticity T m T-m
Expansion
1 150.0 x 1000 x 0.0000120 17.8 + 4.0 x 0.50x 27386.13 53.73 0.213 11.42
2 157.5 x 1000 x 0.0000120 4.0 + 0.0 x 0.50x 27386.13 10.35 0.060 0.621
3 150.0 x 1000 x 0.0000120 2.1 + 0.0 x 0.50x 27386.13 5.176 -0.213 -1.1
Total 69.26 10.94
Reverse Temperature Difference :-
1000 mm T1
h1
h2
T2
525 mm
h3
h4 T3
T4
Total Depth of Top Slab = h = 0.525
h1 = h4 Min of 0.2h or 0.25 m = 0.105
h2 = Min of 0.25h or 0.25 m = 0.131
h3 = h2 = 0.131
0
T1 = 10.6 C
0
T2 = 0.7 C As per Fig 10 (a) of IRC: 6 -2014
0
T3 = 0.8 C
0
T4 = 6.6 C
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 13
Force = F = a * a * t *E
a= Area of Section
a = Coff. Of thermal expansion = 120 x 10 -7 /C Clause 215.4 As per IRC: 6 -2014
E= Modulus of Elasticity = 5000 fck =
5000 30 = 27386.13 Mpa
Temperature Force Calculation Force C.G from Mome
Sr.
Area of Slab Coff. Average Mod of N.A nt
NO
OfThermal Temperature Elasticity T m T-m
1 105.0 x 1000 x 0.0000120 10.6 + 0.7 x 0.50x 27386.13 19.5 0.228 4.44
2 131.3 x 1000 x 0.0000120 0.7 + 0.0 x 0.50x 27386.13 1.51 0.114 0.17
3 131.3 x 1000 x 0.0000120 0.8 + 0.0 x 0.50x 27386.13 1.725 -0.114 -0.20
4 105.0 x 1000 x 0.0000120 6.6 + 0.8 x 0.50x 27386.13 12.77 -0.228 -2.90
Total 35.5 1.51
Maximum Force = 69.26 T Maximum Moment = 10.9 Tm

Hence Governing Force & Moment for Positive Temperature is considere in design
8. Footpath Live Load : -
Pedestrian load on bottom slab is considered 500 kg/m² as per Clause 216.1, IRC: 6 -2014
LOAD COMBINATION AS PER AMENDMENT-2 OF IRC: 6 2014
Limit State of Structural Strength
Load Combination 1: 1.35*DL+1.75*SIDL+1.5*Soil Pressure(Dry)+1.5*Backfill Weight
Load Combination 2: 1.35*DL+1.75*SIDL+1.5*Soil Pressure(Dry)+1.5*Backfill Weight+1.5

Thermal
Load Combination 3: 1.35*DL+1.75*SIDL+1.5*Soil Pressure(Dry)+1.5*Backfill
Weight+1.15*LL1+1.2*Live load surcharge
Weight++1.15*LLBS+1.2*Live load surcharge
Weight+1.5*LLBS+1.2*Live load surcharge
Weight+1.5*LL1+1.2*Live load surcharge+1.5*Thermal
Weight+1.5*LLBS+1.2*Live load surcharge+1.5*Thermal
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 14
Limit State of Servisibility
Rare Combination
Load Combination 2: 1.0*DL+1.2*SIDL+1.0*Soil Pressure(Dry)+1.0*Backfill Weight+1*Thermal

Weight+1*LL1+0.8*Live Load Surcharge
Weight+1*LL2+0.8*Live Load Surcharge
Weight+1*LLBS+0.8*Live Load Surcharge
Weight+1*LL1+0.8*Live Load Surcharge+0.6*Thermal
Weight+1*LL2+0.8*Live Load Surcharge+0.6*Thermal
Weight+1*LLBS+0.8*Live Load Surcharge+0.6*Thermal
Weight+0.75*LL1+0.8*Live Load Surcharge+1.0*Thermal
Weight+0.75*LL2+0.8*Live Load Surcharge+1.0*Thermal
Weight+0.75*LLBS+0.8*Live Load Surcharge+1.0*Thermal
Frequent Combination

Weight+0.75*Thermal
Load Combination 3: 1.0*DL+1.2*SIDL+1.0*Soil Pressure(Dry)+1.0*Backfill Weight+0.75*LL1
Load Combination 4: 1.0*DL+1.2*SIDL+1.0*Soil Pressure(Dry)+1.0*Backfill Weight+0.75*LL2
Load Combination 5: 1.0*DL+1.2*SIDL+1.0*Soil Pressure(Dry)+1.0*Backfill Weight+0.75*LLBS

Weight+0.2*LL1+0.6*Thermal
Weight+0.2*LLBS+0.6*Thermal
Weight+0.75*LLBS+0.5*Thermal
Quasi Permenant Combination

Weight+0.5*Thermal
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 15
Load combination for Base Pressure
Load Combination 1: DL+SIDL+Soil Pressure(Dry)+Backfill Weight

Load Combination 2: DL+SIDL+Soil Pressure(Dry)+Backfill Weight+Thermal
Load Combination 3: DL+SIDL+Soil Pressure(Dry)+Backfill Weight+LL1+Live load surcharge
Load Combination 4: DL+SIDL+Soil Pressure(Dry)+Backfill Weight+LL2+Live load surcharge
Load Combination 5: DL+SIDL+Soil Pressure(Dry)+Backfill Weight+LLBS+Live load surcharge
Load Combination 6: DL+SIDL+Soil Pressure(Dry)+Backfill Weight+LL1+Live load

surcharge+Thermal
Load Combination 7: DL+SIDL+Soil Pressure(Dry)+Backfill Weight+LL2+Live load
surcharge+Thermal
Load Combination 8: DL+SIDL+Soil Pressure(Dry)+Backfill Weight+LLBS+Live load
surcharge+Thermal
Spring Constant Calculation
10 11 12 13 14
11 12 13 14 15 16
19 24
20 24
18 23
19 23
17 22
18 22
16 21
17 21
15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
As per J.E.Bowles page no. 503, eqn no. 9-9, Subgrade Modulus is calculated as
k = 40 x F.O.S x qa
where FOS = Factor Of Safety = 2.5
qa = Allowable bearing pressure = 15.43 t/m²
Therefore k = 40 x 2.5 x 15.43
k = 1543 t/m²
Node Nos. 1 and 10 2 and 9 3 and 8 4, 5, 6 and 7
Distance (m) 0.469 0.406 0.790 1.180
Spring Constant 1543x0.46875x1 1543x0.40625x1 1543x0.79x1 1543x1.18x1
(t/m) 723.28 626.84 1218.97 1820.74
Check for SBC
Summary of support reactions
Load Case No. Total Vertical Reaction(T)
501 50.383 3.37+2.82+5.30+7.10+6.60+6.60+7.10+5.30+2.83+3.37
502 50.383 3.30+2.79+5.26+7.15+6.70+6.70+7.15+5.26+2.79+3.30
503 72.939 6.34+5.17+9.44+11.57+9.73+8.82+8.76+6.15+3.21+3.75
504 66.556 4.98+4.11+7.60+9.74+8.68+8.41+8.88+6.55+3.47+4.12
505 54.144 3.52+2.97+5.63+7.70+7.25+7.25+7.70+5.63+2.98+3.52
506 72.939 6.27+5.13+9.40+11.62+9.83+8.92+8.81+6.11+3.18+3.68
507 66.556 4.91+4.08+7.56+9.79+8.78+8.51+8.93+6.51+3.44+4.05
508 54.144 3.45+2.94+5.59+7.75+7.35+7.35+7.75+5.59+2.94+3.45
Maximum Vertical Reaction = 72.94 T
Maximum Base pressure = 9.061 T/m2
Available SBC = 15.43 T/m2
Therefore Safe
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 16
Design of RCC Box
Results from staad analysis

Component Section Design Moments Design Shear Axial Force
Ultimate Limit Rare Frequent Quasi- Ultimate Limit Ultimate Limit
State Combination Combination Permenant State State
Combination
KN.m KN.m KN.m KN.m kN kN
span 365.442 244.269 217.634 113.471
support (start
Top Slab 315.549 205.236 171.840 96.443 305.621 110.638
of haunch)
support (end
262.495 173.955 140.560 80.210
of haunch)
span 413.160 277.508 254.772 155.079
support (start
Bot. Slab 211.693 168.992 126.677 95.352 335.334 202.029
of haunch)
support (end
162.913 137.171 95.101 71.666
of haunch)
span (Inner) 33.631 58.229 0.000 0.000
Outer wall span (Outer) 176.437 107.735 108.849 21.596 136.429 362.170
support 282.408 194.156 169.081 91.405
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 17
ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE OF STRUCTURAL STRENGTH

MAIN REINFORCEMENT
d req. = (365.442*10^6/(4.01*1000))^0.5
= 301.882 < 475 O.K
Mu/bd2 = 365.442*10^6/(1000*475^2)
= 1.62
Pt = 50*((1-(1-(4.6*1.62/30))^0.5)*30/500)
= 0.399
Ast. req (outer support) = 0.399*1000*475/100
= 1895.25
For Top & Bottom Slab
As min. = 0.26*fctm*bt*d/fyk but not less than 0.0013*bt*d (cl. 16.6.1.1, IRC 112-2011)
For Outer & Inner Wall
As min. = 0.0012*Ac but not less than 12mm Φ & 200mm spacing (cl. 16.3.1, IRC 112-2011)
Also, minimum reinforcement for crack control (cl. 12.3.3, IRC 112-2011)
As.min.ss=kc.k.fct,eff.Act
For top slab,
where, kc = coefficient which takes account of stress distribution within section just prior to cracking and
of the change of the lever arm
= 0.4(1-(sc / k1*(h/h*)*fct.eff)) <= 1 (Eq. 12.2, IRC 112-2011)
sc = NEd/bh (Eq. 12.4, IRC 112-2011)
Ned = 110.638 kN
b = 1000 mm
h = 525 mm
Therefore,sc= 0.211 N/mm2
k1 = coefficient considering the effects of axial forces and stress distribution
= 1.5
Now, h*= h for h< 1.0 m
fct.eff = mean value of tensile strength of the concrete effective at the time when the cracks may first be expected
to occur fct.eff = fctm or lower, fctm(t)
fctm(t) = (bcc(t))a.fctm (Cl. 6.4.2.3(5), IRC 112-2011)
bcc(t) = exp(S(1-(28/t/t1)^0.5)) (Cl. 6.4.2.2(1), IRC 112-2011)
S = 0.25
t = age of concrete in days = 28 days
t1 = 1 day
bcc(t) = 1.00
a = 0.7 for t<28 days
fctm(t) = (bcc(t))a.fctm = 2.5
fct.eff = 2.9 or 2.5 whichever is greater (Cl. 12.3.3, Page 124, IRC 112-2011)
fct.eff = 2.9
kc = 0.38 <= 1
k = 1.00 for h < 300 mm
k = 0.65 for h > 300 mm
k = 0.84 for h = 525 mm
Act = 434620 mm2
Therefore, Asmin= 808.353 mm2 For Crack Control
fctm (Top) = 2.688 fctm (Bottom) = 2.5 fctm (Wall) = 2.688
fyk = 500
bt = 1000
d = 475
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 18
Comp Section Overall Effec. Design Effective Xu,max Type of

onent Depth Depth Moment Depth Section
(D) (Pro.) Mu (Req.)
dpro. dreq.
mm mm KN.m (mm) mm
Under
span 525 475 365.442 301.88 OK 218.5
Reinf.
support Under
Top (start of 575 527 315.549 280.52 OK 242.42 Reinf.
Slab haunch)
support Under
(end of 525 477 262.495 255.85 OK 219.42 Reinf.
haunch)
Under
span 625 542 413.16 320.99 OK 249.32 Reinf.
support Under
Bot.
(start of 675 592 204.45 225.8 OK 272.32 Reinf.
Slab
haunch)
support Under
(end of 625 542 162.913 201.56 OK 249.32 Reinf.
haunch)
Under
span
525 444 33.631 91.58 OK 204.24 Reinf.
(Inner)
Under
Outer span
525 442 176.437 209.76 OK 203.32 Reinf.
wall (Outer)
Under
support 525 442 282.408 265.38 OK 203.32 Reinf.
Comp Section Mu/ Pt Ast req sc Ast (min) Ast req Dia of Spacing Ast pro.
onent bd2 reqd. Bar
(%) mm2 N/mm2 mm2 mm2 mm mm mm2
20 175
span 1.62 0.399 1895.25 0.211 808.35 1895.25 + + 2244.00 OK
10 175
support 10 150
Top
(start of 1.136 0.274 1443.98 0.211 929.81 1443.98 + + 1864.02 OK
Slab
haunch) 16 150
support 10 150
(end of 1.154 0.278 1326.06 0.211 836.81 1326.06 + + 1864.02 OK
haunch) 16 150
16 145
span 1.406 0.343 1859.06 0.323 892.11 1859.06 + + 2166.62 OK
12 145
support 10 150
Bot.
(start of 0.583 0.137 811.04 0.323 995.28 995.28 + + 1864.02 OK
Slab
haunch) 16 150
support 10 150
(end of 0.555 0.13 704.6 0.323 912.33 912.33 + + 1864.02 OK
haunch) 16 150
12 160
span
0.171 0.039 173.16 0.690 630.00 630.00 + + 706.86 OK
(Inner)
0 165
16 150
Outer span
0.903 0.215 950.3 0.690 630.00 950.30 + + 1340.42 OK
wall (Outer)
0 150
16 150
support 1.446 0.353 1560.26 0.690 630.00 1560.26 + + 1864.02 OK
10 150
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 19
DISTRIBUTION REINFORCEMENT
For Top & Bottom Slab (cl. 16.6.1.1, IRC 112-2011)
As Req. = 0.20*Ast prov
For Outer & Inner Wall (cl. 16.3.2, IRC 112-2011)

As Req. = max 0.001*Ac, 0.25* Total Ast vert
but not less than 8mm Φ with 300mm spacing
Comp Section Overall Effec. Ast req Dia of Spacing Ast pro.
onent Depth Depth Bar
(D) (Pro.)
dpro.
mm mm mm2 mm mm mm2
10 160
span 525 460 448.80 + + 490.88 OK
0 175
support 10 175
Top
(start of 575 514 372.80 + + 448.80 OK
Slab
haunch) 0 175
support 10 175
(end of 525 464 372.80 + + 448.80 OK
haunch) 0 175
10 160
span 625 529 433.32 + + 490.88 OK
0 175
support 10 175
Bot.
(start of 675 579 372.80 + + 448.80 OK
Slab
haunch) 0 175
support 10 175
(end of 625 529 372.80 + + 448.80 OK
haunch) 0 175
10 135
span
525 433 525.00 + + 581.78 OK
(Inner)
Outer 0 135
wall 10 135
support 525 429 525.00 + + 581.78 OK
0 135
For top & bottom slab Shear is checked without live load as dispersion is calculated as per Annexure B-3, Clasue
B-3.2 of IRC 112
Check for Shear (Clause 10.3.2 and 10.3.3 Of IRC 112)
Top Slab
VEd = 91.776 KN
NEd = 69.155 KN
VRd.c = (0.12*K*(80*r1*fck)^0.33+0.15*scp)*bw.d
Subject to minimum
vRd.c = (vmin+0.15*scp)*bw.d
K = 1+(200/d)^0.5 or 2 mm whichever is less
= 1.648 or 2 mm whichever is less

= 1.648 mm
scp = NEd/Ac or 0.2*fcd whichever is less
= acc*fck/gm
fcd
= 13.4
Ac = 525000
scp = 69155/525000 or 0.2*13.4
= 0.132 N/mm2
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 20
r1 = Asl/bw.d or 0.02 whichever is less

Asl = 1864.02
bw = 1000.00
d = 477.00
r1 = 0.0039 or 0.020 whichever is less
= 0.0039
VRd.c = 206.75 KN
vmin = 0.031*k^1.5*fck^0.5
vmin = 0.36
vRd.c = 181.145 KN
VRd.c = 181.145 > 91.776 KN
Shear Reinforcement is not required
Bottom Slab
VEd = 156.711 KN
NEd = 178.530 KN
Subject to minimum

= 1.607 mm
fcd
= acc*fck/gm
= 13.4
Ac = 625000
scp = 178530/625000 or 0.2*13.4
= 0.286 N/mm2
Asl = 1864.02
bw = 1000.00
d = 542.00
= 0.0034
VRd.c = 232.18 KN
vmin = 0.031*k^1.5*fck^0.5
vmin = 0.35
vRd.c = 212.923 KN
VRd.c = 212.923 > 156.711 KN
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 21
WALL
VEd = 136.429 KN
NEd = 362.170 KN
Subject to minimum

= 1.673 mm
fcd
= acc*fck/gm
= 13.4
Ac = 525000
scp = 362170/525000 or 0.2*13.4
= 0.6898476 N/mm2
Asl = 1864.02
bw = 1000.00
d = 442.00
= 0.0042
VRd.c = 235.95 KN
vmin = 0.031*k^1.5*fck^0.5
vmin = 0.37
vRd.c = 209.277 KN
VRd.c = 209.277 > 136.429 KN
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 22
Limit State of Serveciability
Short term Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete, Ecm = 22(fcm/12.5)^0.3 = 31187 N/mm2

(Sr no 88, Errata to
IRC:112-2011)
In general, the effects of long term loading (due to creep) shall be obtained seperately and added to those obtained
from short term analysis. The value of Ecm can be modified by a factor (1/1+ f) accounting for long term creep effects.
(Cl. 6.4.2.5 (4) (iii), IRC : 112-2011)
For long term creep effects at age of 70 years,
Notional size ho, 2Ac/u (Table 6.9, IRC-112 : 2011)
Ac = Cross sectional area = 14185000 mm2
u = Perimeter in contact with atmosphere = 23300 mm
Therefore, Notional size, 2Ac/u = 1217.60 mm
Final creep coefficient of concrete for 70 yrs at 28 days age of loading = 2.200
(Table 6.9, IRC-112 : 2011)
The development of creep with time
where (Eq. 6.16, IRC-112 : 2011)
(Eq. 6.17, IRC-112 : 2011)

where
t is the age of concrete in days at the time considered t = 36500 days ( 100 years)
t0 is the age of concrete in days at time of loading t0 = 28 days
(t-t0) is the actual duration of loading in days (t-t0) = 36472 days
for fcm <= 45 (Eq. 6.18, IRC-112 : 2011)
where
RH = Relative Dry expressed as percent = 50 %
RH0 = 100 (i.e. 100 percent) = 100 %
h0 = notional member size = 1218 mm
Therefore, βH = 2076.580 ≤ 1500
Therefore, βH = 1500.000
b(36500,28) = 0.984
f(36500,28) = b(36500,28) x
= 0.984 x 2.200
= 2.164
Therefore, modification factor = (1/1+f)*SQRT(45/(fck+10))) = 0.33525 (Amendment-02 for
IRC-112 : 2011, Table 6.9)
Limit State of Serveciability
Therefore, long term Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete Ecm = 10455
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel Es = 195000
Modular Ratio (Es/Ec) = 195000/10,455 = 18.65
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 23
Depth of N.A for Top Slab (Midspan Section)
Width of Section(b) = 1000

Depth of Section(D) = 525
Effective Depth of Section(d) = 460
Moment of Inertia (I) = 12058593750.000
Xu = 0.87*Fy*Ast/(0.36*Fck*b)
= 90.38 mm
Cracked moment of Inertia Icr = b*Xu^3/3 + (m*As*(d-Xu)^2)
= 476381900.5 mm4
fctm = 2.5
fctm.fl (Top Slab) = MAX(1.6-0.525)*2.5 or 2.5 = 2.688
fctm.fl (Bottom Slab) = MAX(1.6-0.625)*2.5 or 2.5 = 2.5
fctm.fl (Wall) = MAX(1.6-0.525)*2.5 or 2.5 = 2.688
Actual Max. Tensile stress in concrete = M*(D-Xu)/I
= 13.17 > 2.6875 Crack Section
Comp Section Overall Effec. Moment of Inertia Ast pro. Depth of Cracked Moment of Actual
onent Depth Depth (I) N.A Inertia (Icr) Max.
(D) (Pro.) (Xu) Tensile
dpro. Stress
mm mm mm4 mm2 mm mm4
Crack
span 525 460 12058593750 2244.00 90.38 5963868715 13.17
Section
support
Top Crack
(start of 575 514 15842447917 1864.02 75.08 6838607483 9.96
Slab Section
haunch)
support
Crack
(end of 525 464 12058593750 1864.02 75.08 5399608563 9.79
Section
haunch)
Crack
span 625 529 20345052083 2166.62 87.27 8106339089 10.92
Section
support
Bot. Crack
(start of 675 579 25628906250 1864.02 75.08 8969175543 4.96
Slab Section
haunch)
support
Crack
(end of 625 529 20345052083 1864.02 75.08 7304203176 4.4
Section
haunch)
span Uncrack
525 433 12058593750 706.86 28.47 2165080556 1.38
(Inner) Section
Outer
wall
Crack
support 525 429 12058593750 1864.02 75.08 4495735629 10.54
Section
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 24
Check for Deflection (Clause 12.4.1 of IRC 112)

Permissible deflection = L/800 or Max 20 mm under vehicular loading
Actual Deflection = M*L^2/(48*Ec*Icr)

Comp Span Permissible Moment Cracked Vehicle
onent (L) deflection due to Moment of Load
Vehicle Inertia
Load (Icr)
mm KN.m mm4 mm
Top
7.525 9.40625 138.884 5963868715 2.63 OK
Slab
Bot.
7.525 9.40625 132.924 8106339089 1.85 OK
Slab
Outer
5.225 6.53125 103.685 2165080556 2.61 OK
wall
Check for Stresses (Clause 12.2.1 and 12.2.2 of IRC 112)
Permissible Max. compressive stress in concrete for rare combination = 0.48*fck

= 14.4 N/mm2
Permissible Max. compressive stress in concrete for Quasi permanent comb. = 0.36*fck
= 10.8 N/mm2
Permissible Max. tensile stress in steel for rare combination = Min(0.8*fy,300)

= 300 N/mm2
Top Slab midspan Section
Xu = 90.38
Moment of Inertia of Cracked Section Icr = 5963868715 mm4
Load combination 2 (Rare Combination) = 244.269
Load combination 4 (Quasi Permenant Combination) = 113.471
Actual Max. compressive stress in concrete for Rare combination = M*Xu/Icr
= 3.700 < 14.4 O.K
Actual Max. compressive stress in concrete for Quasi permenant comb. = M*Xu/Icr
= 1.72 < 10.8 O.K
Actual Max. tensile stress in steel for Rare combination = m*M*(d-Xu)/Icr
= 282.35 < 300 O.K
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 25
Comp Design Moments Rare Combination Quasi permenent Rare Combination

onent Combination
Rare Quasi- Actual Permissi Actual Permissi Actual Permissi
Combina Permena Max. ble Max. ble Max. ble
tion nt Comp. Comp. Comp. Comp. Tensile. Tensile.
Combina stress stress stress stress stress stress
tion
KN.m KN.m
span 244.269 113.471 3.7 14.4 O.K 1.72 10.8 O.K 282.35 300 O.K
support
Top
(start of 205.236 96.443 2.25 14.4 O.K 1.06 10.8 O.K 245.68 300 O.K
Slab
haunch)
support
(end of 173.955 80.21 2.42 14.4 O.K 1.12 10.8 O.K 233.68 300 O.K
haunch)
span 277.508 155.079 2.99 14.4 O.K 1.67 10.8 O.K 282.03 300 O.K
support
Bot. (start of 168.992 95.352 1.41 14.4 O.K 0.8 10.8 O.K 177.08 300 O.K
Slab haunch)
support
(end of 137.171 71.666 1.41 14.4 O.K 0.74 10.8 O.K 158.99 300 O.K
haunch)
span
58.229 0 0.77 14.4 O.K 0 10.8 O.K 202.91 300 O.K
(Inner)
Outer
wall
support 194.156 91.405 3.24 14.4 O.K 1.53 10.8 O.K 285.07 300 O.K
Check for Cracking (Clause 12.3.4 of IRC 112)

Crack width Wk = Sr,max (esm-ecm)
(esm-ecm) = ssc-(kt*fct,eff*(1+ae*rpeff)/rpeff)/Es Or 0.6*ssc/Es whichever is more
ssc = 157.61 N/mm2

ae = Es/Ecm
Es = 195000
Ecm = 10455
ae = 18.651
rpeff = As/Ac,eff
hc,eff = 2.5*(h-d) or (h-Xu/3) or h/2 whichever is smaller
h = 625
d = 529
Xu = 87.27
hc,eff = 240 or 595.91 or 312.5 whichever is smaller
Ac,eff = 240000 mm 2
rpeff = 0.009
fct,eff (Top) = 2.6875 fct,eff (Bottom) = 2.5 fct,eff (Wall) = 2.688
kt = 0.5
(esm-ecm) = -2E-05 or 0.0005
(esm-ecm) = 0.00048
5*(c+f/2) = 240
Average Dia of Main Steel = 14.29 mm
Spacinfg of Bar = 72.5 mm
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 26
As spacing of bar is less than 5*(c+dia of bar/2) Sr max = 3.4*c+0.17*dia of bar/rpeff
Sr,max = 3.4*c+0.17*f/rpeff Sr no 56, Errata to IRC:112-2011

= 524.841
Wk = 0.25192 mm < 0.3 mm O.K
Spaci
Comp Crack
onent
Section ssc Ac,eff As rpeff (esm-ecm) ng of Sr,max
width Wk
Bar
N/mm2 mm2 mm2 mm mm
span 131.16 162500 2244 0.014 0.0004 87.5 338.381 0.13535 0.3 O.K
support
Top
(centre of 115.45 152500 1864.02 0.012 0.00036 75 329.974 0.11879 0.3 O.K
Slab
wall)
support
(end of 107.75 152500 1864.02 0.012 0.00033 75 329.974 0.10889 0.3 O.K
haunch)
span 157.61 240000 2166.62 0.009 0.00048 72.5 524.841 0.25192 0.3 O.K
support
Bot.
(centre of 99.92 240000 1864.02 0.008 0.00031 75 545.962 0.16925 0.3 O.K
Slab
wall)
support
(end of 83.06 240000 1864.02 0.008 0.00026 75 545.962 0.14195 0.3 O.K
haunch)
span
0.00 230000 706.86 0.003 0 81.25 935.000 0.00000 0.3 O.K
(Inner)
Outer
wall
support 134.20 240000 1864.02 0.008 0.00041 75 545.962 0.22384 0.3 O.K
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 27
Calculation for net S.B.C. of Rock
Calculation for Safe Bearing Pressure (as per IRC 78-2014) based on Core Strength
Chainage 108+875 Structure PUP BH 1
Calculation for Permissible Bearing Pressure of Rock
Bore RL 12.127 m
Founding RL 11.318 m
Depth of foundation below GL 0.775 m
As per IS 8764:1998
Corelation between UCS and point load index = 22x Point load index
2
Point load index = 39.82 kg/cm at depth 1.5 m
2
= 836.22 kg/cm
As per clause 706.3.1.1.2 of IRC 78-2014 the value of factor of safety
based on unconfined compressive strength of the parent rock may be taken as 6 to 8.
The allowable bearing pressure, thus obtained is to be further restricted to not over 3MPa.
Permissible Bearing Pressure (qa) = UCS in kg/cm2

8
Where UCS = Unconfined Compressive Strength in kg/cm2
= 836.22 UCS result is at depth 6 m
F.O.S = 8
Considering the above values,
2
qa = 104.5275 kg/cm
2
qa = 1045.275 T/m
qa = 10.2437 Mpa
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 28
Calculation of Safe Bearing Capacity of soil

Location: Ch. 117+622
Structure: PUP
Bore Hole No : 1 Dry density at depth 0.75 m γd = 1.830 t/m3
Size of Footing Correction for water table W' = 0.500
Type of footing = Rectangle Specific gravity G = 2.170
Width of Footing B = 8.050 m Void ratio e = ((G x γw)/γd) - 1 0.186
Length of Footing L = 28.500 m Void ratio <= 0.550 GSF a= 1.000
Depth of Footing Df = 0.775 m Void ration between 0.550 to 0.750 MSF a= interpolaton
Depth of water table = 3.050 m Void ratio > 0.750 LSF a= 0.500
Density of water γw = 1.000 t/m3 Type of failure occure GSF a = 1.000
Moisture Content(at 0.75m depth)= 24.100 %
Bearing capecity factors As per IS: 6403 - 1981,
Angle of Internal Fricion at depth (m) 0.75 m Ø 8.000 deg

Nq 2.110
Ng 0.912
Nc 7.606
Bulk Density of Soil (g bulk) γ bulk 2.271 t/m3
Inclination to vertical = α 0.000 deg
Cohesion of soil at depth= 0.75 m C 3.800 t/m2
Factor of Safety = F 2.500
 
In case of General shear failure Ultimate Net Bearing Capacity is given by,
q c.Ncsc.dc.ic qNq 1.sq.dq.iq 0.5.B. .N .s .d .i .W'

bulk
Where,
F = Factor of Safety
q = Effective Surcharge
Nc,Nq,Ny= Bearing capacity factors
sc,sq,sg = Shape factors
dc,dq,dg = Depth factors
ic,iq,ig = Inclination factors
sc = 1 + 0.2 x (B/L) = 1.056
sq = 1 + 0.2 x (B/L) = 1.056
sg = 1 - 0.4 x (B/L) = 0.887
dc = 1 + 0.2 x (Df/B) x tan(45+f/2) = 1.022
dq = dg = 1 + 0.1 x (Df/B) x tan(45+f/2) = 1.011
Assuming No Eccentricity,
ic=(1-a/90)2 = 1.000
iq=(1-a/90)2 = 1.000
ig=(1-a/f)2 = 1.000
Substituting above in the following equation,
Net Safe Bearing Capacity = Ultimate Net Bearing Capacity ÷ Factor of Safety (F)
qs 
1
F

c.Nc .sc .dc .ic  qNq 1.sq .dq .iq  0.5.B.
bulk
.N .s .d .i .W' 
=3.800*7.606*1.056*1.022*1.000+2.271*0.775*(2.110-1)*1.056*1.011*"1.000
+0.5x8.05x2.27103x 0.912x0.887x1.011x1.000 x 0.500) /2.500
= (31.193+2.087+3.738)/2.500
= (37.018)/2.500
14.81 t/m2 Net Safe Bearing Capacity
DOCUMENT NO.
SHEET 29
Calculation for Settlement of Foundation as Per IS : 8009 (Part 1 ) - 1976 (Reaffirmed 1998)
Structure: PUP
Location: BH-1
Chainage: 117+622
1 Width of Foundation (B)= 8.050 m = 805.00 cm
2 Length of Foundation (L)= 28.500 m = 2850.00 cm
3 Depth of Foundation below ground level (Df)= 0.775 m = 77.50 cm
4 Dry Density (at 0.75 m depth) (γd)= 1.830 gm/cc
5 Moisture Content (at 0.75 m depth) = 24.100 %
6 Bulk Density (γbulk)= 2.271 gm/cc = 0.00227 kg/cm2
7 Specific Gravity (G)= 2.170
8 Coeff. of Consolidation (Cc) = 0.098 = 0.0980
9 Height of Compr. Layer (Ht) = 1.50 m = 150.00 cm
10 Void Ratio (eo) 0.186 = 0.186
2
11 Foundation pressure (p)= 0.906 kg/cm = 9.061 t/m2
(Which is defined as Net Soil Pressure as per Cl. 6.1 (b) , IS: 6403- 1981)
po = (Df+H/2) γbulk 0.258 kg/cm2
Dp = 0.856 kg/cm2
As per Cl. 9.2.2.2 of IS: 8009 (Part 1) - 1976,
Ht  p  p 
Consolidation Settlement = S f  S oed  C c log 10  0 
1  e0  p0 
Soed = 7.869 cm
Depth Correction = 0.980 (Fig. 12 of IS: 8009 (Part 1) - 1976)

{(Df/(LB)^0.5)= 0.051 & (L/B)= 3.54}
Rigidity Correction = 0.80 (Cl. 9.5 of IS: 8009 (Part 1) - 1976)
Pore Pressure Correction = 0.80 (For Normally consolidated clays as per IS:8009(part 1)-1976)
Corrected Consolidation Settlement Soed = Soed x Depth correction x Rigidity correction x Pore pressure correction
Corrected Consolidation Settlement Soed = 4.94 cm <= 7.5 cm (As per IS : 1904-1986 Table 1)

Mep MK BR Pup CLC 0001

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mep MK BR Pup CLC 0001

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

This document is the property of MEP, and must not be passed on to any third person or firm not authorised

30.01.2017 A0 Issued for Approval VM NKS BS

CLIENT : AUTHORITY'S ENGINEER :

NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA

SAI CONSULTING ENGINEERS PVT. LTD.

RELEASED FOR PRELIMINARY TENDER INFORMATION P APPROVAL CONSTRUCTION

Revision Description of Revision Date

A0 Issued for Approval 30.01.2017

2.0 Codes & References

3.0 Design Concept / Approach

BASIC DESIGN DATA :

Type of Box Underpass

1. Dead Load (Self Weight of bridge) :

Weight of Earth cushion on top slab = 0.000 t/m

2. Superimposed dead load (SIDL) :

Weight of wearing coat / overlay = 1.600 t/m

Width of dispersion along the span

20T 1.22 m 20T

Along longitudinal direction v

Therefore, bef = 3.64 m

Along transerve direction, u = 1.82 + 1.82 + 3.64 - 1.708

As per IRC: 6-2014, Cl. 208.3(a)(ii) and CL. 208.6

Live load intensity = 40.00 x 1.25 = 3.526 t/m2

0.86 0.86 0m + 0.5385m

Along longitudinal direction, v = 2.3904 + 1.22 = 3.61 m < 7.525 m

Therefore, bef = 6.72 m

Live load intensity = 40.00 x 1.25 = 1.879 t/m2

Along transerve direction u = 2.07 + 2.983 + 5.97 - 3.91

As per IRC: 6-2014, Cl. 208.3(a)(ii) and CL. 208.6

Live load intensity = 70 x 1.17 = 2.05 t/m2

Along longitudinal direction v = 1.064 + 4.57 + 1.0635

Therefore, bef = 6.70 m

Also along transverse direction, u = 2.07 + 3.352 + 6.70 - 4.64

Live load intensity = 70 x 1.17375 = 1.64 t/m2

70R Track Class A wheel

Position of Live load in Plan

Part 2 Class A Wheeled vehicles on remaining third lane ,

Width of dispersion along the span

Along longitudinal direction, v = 125+1200+1188.5= 2514 mm < 7525 mm

Calculation of effective width

Now the effective width of slab may be calculated as

Therefore, bef = 3.24 m

Also along transverse direction, u = 1.622 + 1.622 + 3.24 - 1.44

Live load intensity = 22.8 x 1.33 = 2.397 t/m2

Along longitudinal direction, v = 2377+1200 3577

Now the effective width of slab may be calculated as

Therefore, bef = 6.36 m

Also along transverse direction, u = 3.182 + 3.182 + 6.36 - 4.56

Live load intensity = 22.8 x 1.33 = 1.04 t/m2

Summary of all live loads cases

Dispersion v Total Load Dispersion u

As per Cl.214.1.1.1 of Amendment-2 to IRC:6-2014, Coulomb's equation

Considering, property of backfill behind sidewall

Also Active earth pressure at center of topwall = 0.263

6. Live Load Surcharge: - ( When soil is dry )

According to Bell, Active earth pressure = (Ka x g x h) - ( 2 x c x Ka ^ 0.5)

7. Differential Temperature Effect : -

Total Depth of Top Slab = h = 0.525

Maximum Force = 69.26 T Maximum Moment = 10.9 Tm

8. Footpath Live Load : -

LOAD COMBINATION AS PER AMENDMENT-2 OF IRC: 6 2014

Limit State of Structural Strength

Load Combination 1: 1.35DL+1.75SIDL+1.5Soil Pressure(Dry)+1.5Backfill Weight

Load Combination 2: 1.35DL+1.75SIDL+1.5Soil Pressure(Dry)+1.5Backfill Weight+1.5

Load Combination 1: 1.0DL+1.2SIDL+1.0Soil Pressure(Dry)+1.0Backfill Weight

Load Combination 2: 1.0DL+1.2SIDL+1.0Soil Pressure(Dry)+1.0Backfill Weight+1*Thermal

Load Combination 3: 1.0DL+1.2SIDL+1.0Soil Pressure(Dry)+1.0Backfill

Load Combination 1: 1.0DL+1.2SIDL+1.0Soil Pressure(Dry)+1.0Backfill Weight

Load Combination 2: 1.0DL+1.2SIDL+1.0Soil Pressure(Dry)+1.0Backfill

Load Combination 4: 1.0DL+1.2SIDL+1.0Soil Pressure(Dry)+1.0Backfill Weight+0.75*LL2

Load Combination 5: 1.0DL+1.2SIDL+1.0Soil Pressure(Dry)+1.0Backfill Weight+0.75*LLBS

Load Combination 6: 1.0DL+1.2SIDL+1.0Soil Pressure(Dry)+1.0Backfill

Load Combination 1: 1.0DL+1.2SIDL+1.0Soil Pressure(Dry)+1.0Backfill Weight

Load Combination 3: 1.0DL+1.2SIDL+1.0Soil Pressure(Dry)+1.0Backfill

Cracked moment of Inertia Icr = bXu^3/3 + (mAs*(d-Xu)^2)

Actual Deflection = ML^2/(48Ec*Icr)

Actual Max. tensile stress in steel for Rare combination = mM(d-Xu)/Icr