MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: MA. TERESA A. ECLEO Name of Rater: EDITHA B. MONTENEGRO

Position: TEACHER I Position: HEAD TEACHER III
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPED/ SAN FRANCISCO 1/ QUEZON/ LOAWAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Date of Review: FEBRUARY 10, 2023
Rating Period: AUGUST 2022 TO JANUARY 2023

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
ce Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 7% Classroom observation Quality 3 0.675

Educati Knowledge knowledge of tool (COT) rating sheet
on and content within and/or
Service Pedagogy and across inter-observer agreement
s curriculum form done through
teaching areas onsite/face-to-face/in-
(PPST 1.1.2) person classroom
observation

If onsite/face-to-face/in
person classroom
observation are not Efficiency 2 0.45
implemented,
• Through observation
of
synchronous/asynch
ronous teaching and
other modalities; or
• Through observation
of a demonstration
teaching *via LAC
session

Timeliness
 MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
ce Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Basic 2. Used a Classroom observation Quality 3 0.675

Educati range of tool (COT) rating sheet
on teaching and/or
Service strategies that inter-observer agreement
s enhance form done through
learner onsite/face-to-face/in-
achievement person classroom
in literacy and observation
numeracy
skills. (PPST If onsite/face-to-face/in
1.4.2) person classroom
observation are not
implemented
• Through observation of Efficiency 2 0.45
synchronous/asynchrono
us teaching and other
modalities; or
• Through observation of
a demonstration teaching
*via LAC session

Timeliness

Basic 3. Applied a Classroom observation Quality 2 0.45

Educati range of tool (COT) rating sheet
on teaching and/or
Service strategies to inter-observer agreement
s develop critical form done through
and creative onsite/face-to-face/in-
thinking, as person classroom
well as other observation
higher order
thinking If onsite/face-to-face/in
skills. (PPST person classroom
1.5.2) observation are not
 implemented,
• Through observation of
synchronous/asynchr
on
ous teaching and other

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
modalities; or Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
• Through observation of ce Target
a demonstration Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
teaching *via LAC
session Efficiency 3 0.675

Timeliness

Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 7% Classroom observation Quality 2 0.45

Educati Environme classroom tool (COT) rating sheet
on nt and structure to and/or
Service Diversity engage inter-observer agreement
s of Learners learners, form done through
individually or onsite/face-to-face/in-
in groups, in person classroom
meaningful observation Efficiency 2 0.45
 exploration, Timeliness
discovery and If onsite/face-to-face/in
hands-on person classroom
activities within observation are not
a range of implemented,
physical • Through observation of
learning synchronous/asynchr
environments. on
(PPST 2.3.2) ous teaching and other
modalities; or
• Through observation of
a demonstration
teaching *via LAC
session

Basic 5. Managed Classroom observation Quality 3 0.675

Educati learner tool (COT) rating sheet
on behavior and/or
Service constructively 7% inter-observer agreement
s by applying form done through
positive and onsite/face-to-face/in-
non-violent person classroom
discipline to observation
ensure learning

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
focused If onsite/face-to-face/in Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
environments person classroom ce Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
 (PSST 2.6.2) observation are not Efficiency 3 0.675
implemented,
• Through observation of
synchronous/asynchr
on
ous teaching and other
modalities; or
• Through observation of
a demonstration
teaching *via LAC
session

Timeliness
7%
Basic 6. Used Classroom observation Quality 2 0.45
Educati differentiated, tool (COT) rating sheet
on developmenta and/or
Service lly inter-observer agreement
s appropriate form done through
learning onsite/face-to-face/in-
experiences to person classroom
address observation
learners’
gender, needs, If onsite/face-to-face/in
strengths, person classroom Efficiency 2 0.45
interests and observation are not
experiences. implemented,
(PPST 3.1.2) • Through observation of
synchronous/asynchr
on
ous teaching and other
modalities; or
• Through observation of
a demonstration
teaching *via LAC
session

Timeliness
 MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
ce Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Basic 3. 7. Planned, 7% Classroom observation Quality 2 0.45

Educati Curriculum managed and tool (COT) rating sheet
on and implemented and/or
Service Planning developmenta inter-observer agreement
s lly sequenced form done through
teaching and onsite/face-to-face/in-
learning person classroom
processes to observation
meet
curriculum If onsite/face-to-face/in
requirements person classroom
and varied observation are not Efficiency 2 0.45
teaching implemented,
contexts. • Through observation of
(PPST 4.1.2) synchronous/asynchr
on
ous teaching and other
modalities; or
• Through observation of
a demonstration
teaching *via LAC
session

Timeliness
7%
8. Participated 1. Proof/s of Quality 3 0.675
in collegial attendance in LAC
discussions Sessions/FGDs/meeting
that use s/other collegial
teacher and discussions
learner
feedback
 MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
to enrich 2. Minutes of LAC Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
teaching Sessions/FGDs/meeting ce Target
practice. (PPST s/ and other collegial Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
4.4.2) discussions on the use
of teacher and learner Efficiency 2 0.45
feedback to enrich
teaching practice.
3. Reflection notes of
teachers on their
demonstration of
teaching practices
following participations Timeliness
from LAC
sessions/FGDs/meeting
s/other collegial
discussions that use
teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice with
proof/s of attendance
4. Any equivalent ALS
Form/document that
highlights the objective
7%

Basic 9. Selected, Classroom observation Quality 3 0.675

Educati developed, tool (COT) rating sheet
on organized and and/or
Service used inter-observer agreement
s appropriate form done through
teaching and onsite/face-to-face/in-
learning person classroom
resources, observation
 MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
including ICT, If onsite/face-to-face/in Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
to address person classroom ce Target
learning observation are not Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
goals. implemented,
(PPST 4.5.2) • Through observation of Efficiency 3 0.675
synchronous/asynchr
on
ous teaching and other
modalities; or
• Through observation of
a demonstration
teaching *via LAC
session

Timeliness

Basic 4. 10. Designed, 7% Classroom observation Quality 3 0.675

Educati Assessme selected, tool (COT) rating sheet
on nt and organized and and/or
Service Reporting used inter-observer agreement
s diagnostic, form done through
formative and onsite/face-to-face/in-
summative person classroom
assessment observation
strategies
consistent with If onsite/face-to-face/in
curriculum person classroom
requirements. observation are not
(PPST 5.1.2) implemented,
• Through observation of
synchronous/asynchr
on
ous teaching and other
modalities; or
• Through observation of
a demonstration
teaching *via LAC
session
 MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
ce Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Efficiency 3 0.675

7%

Timeliness

Basic 11. Monitored Any one of the Quality 2 0.45

Educati and evaluated following: • Individual
on learner Learning
Service progress and Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
s achievement • Peer Assessment Data •
using learner Sample of Learner’s output
attainment with reflection/self Efficiency 2 0.45
data. (PPST assessment
5.2.2) • Progress Charts/Anecdotal
Records
• Class/e-class
 records/grading sheets Timeliness 2 0.45
• Lesson Plan showing index
of mastery
• Frequency of errors with
identified least
mastered
skills
• Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective
(e.g. Individual Learning
Achievement (ILA), ALS
Assessment Form 2)
• Others (Please specify and

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
provide annotations) Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
ce Target
7% Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Basic 12.Communicat Any one (1) of the Quality 2 0.45

ed promptly
and
clearly the
learners’
needs,
progress and
Educati achievement to following: Efficiency 2 0.45
on key • A sample of corrected
Service stakeholders, test paper of learner in
s including a
parents/
guardians learning area with
(PPST 5.4.2) parents’ or guardian’s
signature and date of
receipt
• Minutes of meeting with
key stakeholders (e.g.
PTC, SGC, SPT, CPC) Timeliness 2 0.45
with proof of attendance
• Report card with
parent’s or guardian’s
signature in all quarters
supported by minutes of
the meeting
• Communication with
stakeholders (e.g.
parents/guardians, co
teacher, LGU) using
various modalities
• Anecdotal record
showing entries per
quarter
• Any equivalent ALS
Form/document that
highlights the objective
• Others (Please specify
and provide
annotations)

13. Applied a 7% A reflection/journal Quality

personal entry that highlights
philosophy of the application of a Timeliness
teaching that is learner-centered
 MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
learner teaching philosophy in Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
centered. the lesson plan or ce Target
(PPST 7.1.2) community work. Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

14. Set 7% 1. Certification form the ICT Quality

professional Coordinator/School Head/
development Focal Person in-charge of e-
goals based SAT 2. IPCRF-DP Efficiency
on the 3. Mid-year Review Form
Philippine (MRF) 4. Updated IPCRF-DP
Professional from Phase II
Timeliness
Standards for
Teachers
(PPST 7.5.2)

Basic 5. Plus Factor 15. Performed 2% Any one (1) proof of: Quality 3 0.3
Educati various related • Committee involvement
on works/activities • Involvement as
Service that contribute module/learning
s to the material writer/validator
teaching • Involvement as a
learning resource
process. person/speaker/learning
 facilitator in the Efficiency 2 0.2
RO/SDO/School
initiated TV/Radio
based instruction
• Book or journal
authorship/co
authorship/contributor
ship
• Advisorship/coordinator
ship/chairpersonship
• Participation in Timeliness
demonstration teaching
• Participation as
research presenter in a
forum or conference
• Mentoring or pre
service/in-service
teachers
• Conducted research

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
within the rating period Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
• Others please specify ce Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
with annotation on how it
contributed to the
teaching learning
process.

EDITHA B. MONTENEGRO Rater

MARK ANTHONY G. DISPO Ratee
MA. BELEN A. TINIO, EDL Approving Authority