MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: NONITO S. SOLSONA Name of Rater: ALFREDO L. VITTO

Position: TEACHER III Position: MASTER TEACHER I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: PAMBISAN NHS/SDO-ORIENTAL MINDORO Date of Review: July 17, 2023
Rating Period: Year-round

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year

Weight
Timeli Perform Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives per Means of Verification
ne ance Results
KRA Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Target
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied Year- Classroom Observation Tool
Education Knowledg
Services
knowledge of round (COT) rating sheet or inter-
e and content within and observer agreement form
Pedagogy across curriculum from
teaching areas. 1. an observation of
synchronous teaching
(limited face-to-face
5.0% teaching, online teaching, Quality 4 On process
or two-way radio
instruction)
2. if option 1 is not possible,
an observation of a
recorded video lesson or
audio lesson that is SLM-
based or MELC-aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation of
a demonstration teaching*
via LAC
Basic 2. Used research- One (1) lesson plan with
Education
Services
based knowledge annotations identifying the
and principles of research-based knowledge
teaching and and/or principles of teaching
learning to and learning used as basis for
enhance 5.0% planning / designing the lesson Quality 5 On process
professional
practice
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Timeli
MFOs KRAs Objectives per Means of Verification Perform Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
ne
KRA ance Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 3. Displayed Classroom Observation Tool Target
Education
Services
proficient use of (COT) rating sheet or inter-
Mother Tongue, observer agreement form
Filipino and from
English to facilitate 1. an observation of
teaching and synchronous teaching
learning (limited face-to-face
teaching, online teaching,
5.0% or two-way radio Quality 4 On process
instruction)
2. if option 1 is not possible,
an observation of a
recorded video lesson or
audio lesson that is SLM-
based or MELC-aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation of
a demonstration teaching*
via LAC
Basic 4. Used effective Classroom Observation Tool
Education
Services
verbal and non- (COT) rating sheet or inter-
verbal classroom observer agreement form
communication from
strategies to 1. an observation of
support learner synchronous teaching
understanding, (limited face-to-face
participation, teaching, online teaching,
engagement and or two-way radio
achievement 5.0% instruction) Quality 5 On process
2. if option 1 is not possible,
an observation of a
recorded video lesson or
audio lesson that is SLM-
based or MELC-aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation of
a demonstration teaching*
via LAC
Basic 2. 5. Established safe Classroom Observation Tool
Education
Services
Learning and secure (COT) rating sheet or inter-
Environ learning observer agreement form
ment environments to from
enhance learning 1. an observation of
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Timeli
MFOs KRAs Objectives per Means of Verification Perform Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
ne
KRA ance Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
through the synchronous teaching Target
consistent (limited face-to-face
implementation of teaching, online teaching,
policies, 5.0% or two-way radio Quality 5 On process
guidelines and instruction)
procedures 2. if option 1 is not possible,
an observation of a
recorded video lesson or
audio lesson that is SLM-
based or MELC-aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation of
a demonstration teaching*
via LAC
Basic 6. Maintained Classroom Observation Tool
Education
Services
learning (COT) rating sheet or inter-
environments that observer agreement form
promote fairness, from
respect and care 1. an observation of
to encourage synchronous teaching
learning 5.0% (limited face-to-face Quality 5 On process
teaching, online teaching,
or two-way radio
instruction)
2. if option 1 is not possible,
an observation of a
recorded video lesson or
audio lesson that is SLM-
based or MELC-aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation of
a demonstration teaching*
via LAC
Basic 7. Maintained SET B
Education
Services
learning Classroom Observation Tool
environments that (COT) rating sheet or inter-
nurture and inspire 5.0% observer agreement form Quality 5 On process
learners to from
participate, 1. an observation of
cooperate and synchronous teaching
collaborate in (limited face-to-face
continued learning teaching, online teaching,
or two-way radio
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Timeli
MFOs KRAs Objectives per Means of Verification Perform Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
ne
KRA ance Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
instruction) Target
2. if option 1 is not possible,
an observation of a
recorded video lesson or
audio lesson that is SLM-
based or MELC-aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation of
a demonstration teaching*
via LAC
8. Applied a range of SET B
successful Classroom Observation Tool
strategies that (COT) rating sheet or inter-
maintain learning observer agreement form
environments that from
motivate learners 1. an observation of
to work synchronous teaching
productively by 5.0% (limited face-to-face Quality 5 Existing
assuming teaching, online teaching,
responsibility for or two-way radio
their own learning instruction)
2. if option 1 is not possible,
an observation of a
recorded video lesson or
audio lesson that is SLM-
based or MELC-aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation of
a demonstration teaching*
via LAC
Basic 3. Diversity 9. Designed, SET B
Education of Learners,
Services
adapted and Teacher Reflection Form (TRF)
Curriculum implemented on designing, adapting, and/or
and
teaching implementing teaching
Planning, &
Assessment strategies that are 5.0% strategies that are responsive to Quality 4 Existing
and responsive to learners with disabilities,
Reporting learners with giftedness and talents and a
disabilities, certification from the school
giftedness and head that the ratee’s
talents classes have no identified
learner/s with disabilities,
giftedness and/or talents
Basic 10. Adapted and SET B
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Timeli
MFOs KRAs Objectives per Means of Verification Perform Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
ne
KRA ance Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Education used culturally Teacher Reflection Form Target
Services
appropriate (TRF) on adapting and using
teaching 5.0% culturally appropriate teaching Quality 5 Existing
strategies to strategies to address the
address the needs of learners from
needs of learners indigenous groups and a
from indigenous certification from the school
groups head that the ratee’s classes
have no identified learner/s
from indigenous groups
Basic 11. Adapted and 1. Proof of evaluation* on the
Education
Services
implemented implementation of the
learning adapted / contextualized
programs that learning program
ensure relevance 2. Progress report on the
and implementation of the
responsiveness adapted / contextualized
to the needs of learning program
all learners 5.0% 3. Accomplishment / Quality 3 Existing
completion / technical report
on the implementation of an
adapted / contextualized
learning program
4. Action plan / activity
proposal / activity matrix that
shows an adapted /
contextualized learning
program
Basic 12. Utilized A list of identified least /
Education
Services
assessment data most mastered skills based
to inform the on the frequency of errors /
modification of correct responses with any
teaching and of the following supporting
learning practices MOV
and programs 1. accomplishment report for
remedial / enhancement
activities (e.g., remedial
sessions, Summer Reading
Camp, Phil-IRIbased reading
program)
5.0% 2. intervention material used for Quality 4 On process
remediation / reinforcement /
enhancement
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Timeli
MFOs KRAs Objectives per Means of Verification Perform Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
ne
KRA ance Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
3. lesson plan/activity log for Target
remediation / enhancement
utilizing of assessment data
to modify teaching and
learning practices or
programs
4. 13. Maintained 1. Accomplishment report of a
Community learning program / project / activity
Linkages environments that that maintains a learning
and are responsive to environment
Professional community 2. Program / Project / Activity
Engagemen contexts plan on maintaining a learning
t & Personal environment
Growth and
5.0% 3. Minutes of a consultative Quality 5 On process
Professional
meeting / community
Developme
nt
stakeholders meeting about a
program / project / activity
that maintains a learning
environment with proof of
attendance
4. Communication letter about a
program / project / activity
that maintains a learning
environment
14. Reviewed 1.Annotated video / audio
regularly personal recording of one’s teaching
teaching practice that shows impact of regularly
using existing laws reviewing one’s teaching
and regulations practice/s\
that apply to the 2.Annotated teaching material
teaching 5.0% that shows impact of regularly Quality 5 On process
profession and the reviewing one’s teaching
responsibilities practice/s
specified in the ● lesson plan
Code of Ethics for ● activity sheet
Professional ● assessment
Teachers materials
● others (please
specify)
3.Personal reflection notes as
outputs from participation in
review of personal teaching
practices in four (4) quarters
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Timeli
MFOs KRAs Objectives per Means of Verification Perform Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
ne
KRA ance Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
4.Proof of attendance Target
(with date) in LAC or
coaching and
mentoring sessions for
review of personal
teaching practices
15. Complied with 1.Proof of participation /
and implemented involvement in a school-
school policies community partnership for the
and procedures implementation of a school
consistently to 5.0% policy / procedure (e.g., Quality 5 Existing
foster harmonious certificate as committee
relationships with member, narrative report)
learners, parents, 2.Minutes of parent-teacher
and other conference / stakeholders’
stakeholders meeting about an
implemented school policy /
procedure with proof of
attendance
3.Communication letter about
an implemented school
policy / procedure sent to
parent / guardian
16. Applied a One (1) lesson plan with
personal annotations explaining the
philosophy of application of a learner-
teaching that is 5.0% centered teaching philosophy Quality 5 Existing
learner-centered (e.g., constructivism,
existentialism) used as basis for
planning / designing the lesson
17. Adopted 1. Documented feedback from
practices that superiors, colleagues,
uphold the dignity learners, parents / guardian,
of teaching as a or other stakeholders directly
profession by reflecting the ratee’s good
exhibiting qualities practices that uphold the
such as caring dignity of teaching as a
attitude, respect 5.0% profession Quality 5 On process
and integrity 2. Annotated evidence of
practice indirectly linking to
the upholding of the dignity of
teaching as a profession by
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Timeli
MFOs KRAs Objectives per Means of Verification Perform Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
ne
KRA ance Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
exhibiting qualities such as Target
caring attitude, respect and
integrity
● Screenshot of text
message / chat / email /
any form of communication
with parents / guardian or
learners (name or any
identifier removed)
● Remarks from mentor /
master teacher / school
head about one’s qualities
(e.g., entries in
Performance Monitoring
and Coaching Form
[PMCF] or in Mid-Year
Review Form)
● Recognition from the
school / school community
about one’s qualities
● Others (please specify)
18. Set professional 1. Updated IPCRF-DP from
development Phase II
goals based on 2. Mid-year Review Form (MRF)
the Philippine 5.0% 3. IPCRF-DP Quality 5 On process
Professional 4. Certification from the ICT
Standards for Coordinator / School Head /
Teachers Focal Person in charge of
eSAT

5: Plus 19. Performed Any proof of:

Factor various related
works / activities
that contribute to
the teaching-
learning process
● committee involvement
● advisorship of cocurricular
activities
10.0% ● book or journal authorship / Quality 4 Existing
contributorship
● coordinatorship /
chairpersonship
● coaching and mentoring
learners in competitions
● serving as reliever of
classes in the absence of
teachers
 Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Timeli
MFOs KRAs Objectives per Means of Verification Perform Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
ne
KRA ance Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
● mentoring pre-service Target
teachers
● participation in
demonstration
teaching
● participation as technical
working group member
● others (please
specify and provide
annotations)

NONITO S. SOLSONA ALFREDO L. VITTO ANA FLORENCE M. DAVID

Ratee Rater Approving Authority

Date: __________________ Date: __________________ Date: __________________